Submit manuscript...
MOJ
eISSN: 2381-182X

Food Processing & Technology

Review Article Volume 8 Issue 1

Nitrogen use efficiency of extra early maize varieties as affected by split nitrogen application in two agroecologies of Nigeria

Olaiya AO,1 Oyafajo AT,1 Atayese MO,1 Bodunde JG2

1Department of Crop Physiology and Crop Production, Federal University of Agriculture, Nigeria
2Department of Horticulture, Federal University of Agriculture, Nigeria

Correspondence: Olaiya A.O, Department of Crop Physiology and Crop Production, Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, Ogun State, Nigeria

Received: July 04, 2019 | Published: January 31, 2020

Citation: Olaiya AO, Oyafajo AT, Atayese MO, et al. Nitrogen use efficiency of extra early maize varieties as affected by split nitrogen application in two agroecologies of Nigeria. MOJ Food Process Technol. 2020;8(1):5-11. DOI: 10.15406/mojfpt.2020.08.00235

Download PDF

Abstract

Poor yield of maize has been attributed to low soil N since maize requires high Nitrogen for optimum productivity. Field experiments were conducted in the late season of 2014 at IITA, Research Farms, in Ibadan and Mokwa. The research was to evaluate the effects of split N fertilizer on nitrogen use efficiency of extra early maize varieties. Arrangement was 5 x 8 factorial fitted into Randomized Complete Block Design, with four replications. Extra early maturing maize varieties (2013 TZEE-W DT STR, TZEE-Y Pop STR C4, TZEE-W Pop STR C5, 2013 TZEE-Y DT STR, and 99 TZEE-Y STR QPM) with Nitrogen fertility rates ( 0 kg N ha-1 (Control), 30 kg N ha-1 single, 60 kg N ha-1 single, 60 kg N ha-1 split (30:30) applied at 2 and 4 weeks after sowing (WAS), 90 kg N ha-1 split 60:30 applied at 2 and 4 WAS, 90 kg N ha-1 split (30:30:30) applied at 2, 4 and 6 WAS, 120 kg N ha-1 split (60:60) applied at 2 and 4 WAS and 120 kg N ha-1 split (30:60:30) applied 2, 4 and 6 WAS). Data collected were subjected to Analysis of Variance procedure and significant means were separated using Duncan’s Multiple Range Test at p<0.05. Results showed that maize variety 2013 TZEE-W DT STR produce highest number of leaves, plant height, leaf area, cob yield (3.33, 3.15 t ha-1), grain yield (2.57, 2.38 t ha-1) and Nitrogen use efficiency (33.03, 28.95%) at Mokwa and Ibadan respectively. Split application of 90 kg N ha-1 as (60:30) at 2 and 4 WAS produce significantly (p<0.05) higher 1000 grain weight, cob yield (3.90, 3.73 t ha-1) and grain yield (2.99, 2.80 t ha-1) at Mokwa and Ibadan respectively. The control produced significantly reduced dried cob and grain yield by (85, 81%) and (84.4, 80.4%) in Mokwa and Ibadan respectively, compared to the best rate of 60:30 split N application. The N application of 30 kg N ha-1 as single dose had the highest Nitrogen use efficiency (51.3, 43.0 %) in both Mokwa and Ibadan, which was significantly different (p<0.05) from the rest treatments. Across the varieties used in both locations, Mokwa agro-ecology zone proved to be a favourable location for higher yield of extra early maize varieties. The study concluded that application of 30kgN/hectare at two weeks after sowing efficiently improved Extra early maize varieties and is thus recommended as low input package for resource poor farmers.

Introduction

Maize (Zea mays L.) is the most important cereal crop in Nigeria in terms of production and consumption.1 Maize accounts for 15-20% of the total daily calories in the diets of more than 20 developing countries found in Latin America and Africa.1,2

It is grown for energy-rich grains and its production is increasingly gaining wider acceptability over other traditional cereal crops in the savanna of West and Central Africa (WCA).3,4 It has high yield potential, wide adaptation, relative ease of cultivation, storage and transportation. These desirable attributes of maize have increased the potential of the crop for combating food security challenges posed by population increase in WCA. Average productivity of maize is 6.7 t ha-1 in developed countries and 2.4 t ha-1 in developing countries.5 Maize is usually considered to have a high soil fertility requirement to achieve optimal yields6 and thus large quantities of N is required. Poor soil fertility is one of the principal factors that limit maize productivity in maize in Nigeria and nitrogen being the most yield limiting nutrient, its stress reduces grain yield by delaying plant growth and development.7 According to Sowers et al,8 the application of high N rates may result in poor N uptake and low nitrogen use efficiency due to excessive N losses. Similarly N fertilization and management practices remain significant agronomic practices for maize to produce high yield9,10 Nitrogen use and demand is continuously increasing day by day.11 Since it is highly mobile, it is subject to greater losses from the soil-plant system.11 According to Sowers et al,8 the application of high N rates may result in poor N uptake and low nitrogen use efficiency due to excessive N losses. Ali and Raouf,12 reported positive effect of rate and timing of N application on nitrogen use efficiency while Amanullah,13 reported effect of source and application mode on NUE and harvest index. In view of the rapidly expanding population in Nigeria and the general acceptability of maize as a popular staple food among small scale farmers, there is the need to increase production through the use of appropriate nitrogen fertilizer rate to ensure optimal productivity. Therefore this has necessitated the need to evaluate the effect of split N application rates on growth and yield of extra early maize varieties at two Agro ecological zones of Nigeria.

Material and methods

The experiment was conducted during late season of 2014 planting season in Ibadan (forest-savanna transition) and Mokwa (southern guinea savanna) zones. Land preparation was done mechanically, first and second ploughs, harrowed and marked with mechanical marker of 0.75m inter-row spacing. A factorial experiment fitted into randomized complete block design was used for both locations. The treatment were 5 varieties x 8 fertilizer rates making 40 treatment combinations replicated four times; three row planting of 5m long with inter and intra-row spacing of 0.75m x 0.25m . The plot size was 5m x 2.25m with total experimental area of 90m x 27.5m (2475m2).

Basal application of P and K at rates equivalent to 30 kg P2O5 and K2O ha-1 respectively were made at time of first N application.

The following parameters were collected for, plant height, number of leaves, leaf area, stem girth, cob yield (t ha-1), 1000 seed weight (g) and grain yield (t ha-1). Growth parameters were taken at 4 and 8 weeks after sowing (WAS). 

Grain yield per heactare (t ha-1):

Grain yield was estimated using the formula:

Field Weight(kg/plot)X(100GMC)X80/100 85 X 10,000 0.25X0.75X21 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqkY=Mj0xXdbba91rFfpec8Eeeu0xXdbba9frFj0=OqFf ea0dXdd9vqaq=JfrVkFHe9pgea0dXdar=Jb9hs0dXdbPYxe9vr0=vr 0=vqpWqaaeaabiGaciaacaqabeaadaqaaqaaaOqaamaalaaabaGaam OraiaadMgacaWGLbGaamiBaiaadsgaqaaaaaaaaaWdbiaacckacaWG xbGaamyzaiaadMgacaWGNbGaamiAaiaadshacaGGOaGaam4AaiaadE gacaGGVaGaamiCaiaadYgacaWGVbGaamiDaiaacMcacaWGybGaaiik aiaaigdacaaIWaGaaGimaiabgkHiTiaadEeacaWGnbGaam4qaiaacM cacaWGybGaaGioaiaaicdacaGGVaGaaGymaiaaicdacaaIWaaapaqa aiaaiIdacaaI1aaaaiaadIfadaWcaaqaaiaaigdacaaIWaGaaiilai aaicdacaaIWaGaaGimaaqaaiaaicdacaGGUaGaaGOmaiaaiwdacaWG ybGaaGimaiaac6cacaaI3aGaaGynaiaadIfacaaIYaGaaGymaaaaaa a@66E7@

Where:14

Fw = field weight of ears at harvest

Gmc = grain moisture content (%)

0.8 = shelling coefficient of maize

(100-15)= 15% moisture in grain at dry state

10,000m2 = harvested area conversion into standard unit (ha)

Nitrogen use efficiency: Expressed as grain production per unit of Nitrogen applied

The agronomic nitrogen use efficiency (NUEA) was calculated using the formulae:13

NU E A = Grain yeild with NGrain yeild without N N rate MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqkY=Mj0xXdbba91rFfpec8Eeeu0xXdbba9frFj0=OqFf ea0dXdd9vqaq=JfrVkFHe9pgea0dXdar=Jb9hs0dXdbPYxe9vr0=vr 0=vqpWqaaeaabiGaciaacaqabeaadaqaaqaaaOqaaiaad6eacaWGvb GaamyramaaBaaaleaacaWGbbaabeaakiabg2da9maalaaabaGaam4r aiaadkhacaWGHbGaamyAaiaad6gaqaaaaaaaaaWdbiaacckapaGaam yEaiaadwgacaWGPbGaamiBaiaadsgapeGaaiiOa8aacaWG3bGaamyA aiaadshacaWGObWdbiaacckacaWGobGaeyOeI0YdaiaadEeacaWGYb GaamyyaiaadMgacaWGUbWdbiaacckapaGaamyEaiaadwgacaWGPbGa amiBaiaadsgapeGaaiiOa8aacaWG3bGaamyAaiaadshacaWGObGaam 4BaiaadwhacaWG0bWdbiaacckapaGaamOtaaqaaiaad6eapeGaaiiO aiaadkhacaWGHbGaamiDaiaadwgaaaaaaa@688E@

The planting materials used were five cultivated extra early maize varieties comprising of striga tolerant maize varieties obtained from maize breeding unit (DTMA), International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Ibadan, (IITA).

Data collected was subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) procedures according to the methods described by Steel et al. Treatment means were separated using the Duncan Multiple Range Test (DMRT) at 5% level of probability.

Results and discussions

Pre-cropping soil physiochemical properties analysis; the result showed that the field trials for both agro-ecology is sandy soil in texture, medium to slightly acidic soil, low in total Nitrogen (N), medium in available phosphorus (P). As result of its low essential macronutrients the soil can be regarded as a poor soil for maize production. The pH of 5.7 and 6.0 was moderate for maize production (Table 1). Very low in total Nitrogen (N of 0.09, 0.04kg-1 of soil is less than the critical level of 1.5kg-1 (Enwezor et al, 1998), while the available phosphorus (P) of 8.7, 10.3mgkg-1 exceeds the critical level of 8.10mgkg-1 (Agboola, 1982). The pH of 6.0 was moderate for maize production (Table 1). The data presented in Table 2 showed that maize varieties respond differently to Nitrogen fertilizer rates in both locations. Split N application greatly enhanced the performance of extra-early maize varieties in the various growth parameters measured. Application of nitrogen fertilizer produced significantly higher number of leaves, taller plants height, wider leaf area and thicker stem girth when compared with 0 kg N/ha. Application of 120kgN/ha split (60:60) applied at 2 and 4 WAS produced the highest number of leaves and widest leaf area when compared to other treatments in both locations. The tallest plant height and thickest stem girth was produced with the application rate of 90kgN/ha split (60:30) applied at 2 and 4 WAS. This result is an indication that higher levels of nitrogen fertilizer promote the vegetative growth in maize and its deficiency reduces the vegetative growth of maize. This agrees with15 who reported higher application rate of 120 kgN/ha to produced the highest number of leaves. Also,16,17 reported that higher nitrogen rate promotes vegetative growth in maize. Similar results that plant height increases with increasing levels of fertilizers were reported by Maqsood et al, 18 Ayub et al,19 and Sharar et al.20 But these results are contrary to those of21 who reported that time of application of N had no significant effect on maize plant characters. The least value for leaf area, number of leaves, plant height and stem girth was recorded in the control plot with 0kgN/ha. This result agrees with Tweneboah22 who earlier established that nitrogen deficiency retarded growth of maize and resulted into stunted growth and poor root development.

Soil properties

Ibadan  

Mokwa                                                         

Sand(%)

92

90

Silt(%)

3

5

Clay(%)

5

5

Textural class

sandy

sandy

pH

6.0

5.7

Ca(cmol kg-1)

21.4

13.4

O.C(%)

1.2

0.35

Mg(cmol kg-1)

1.9

0.8

Na(cmol kg -1)

0.4

0.3

K(cmol kg -1)

0.2

0.2

 AL + H(cmol kg -1)

0.1

0.1

ECEC(cmol kg -1)

30

20.1

 Base Sat(%)

99.7

99.5

Total N

0.09

0.04

Av.P(ppm)

8.7

10.3

Cu(ppm)

1.6

0.9

Mn(ppm)  

57.5

180

Fe(ppm)

136

59

Zn(ppm)  

4.7

9.5

Table 1 Pre-cropping soil physico-chemical properties for both locations, 2014

            NL        

           PH

          LA

          SG

Treatments

Mokwa

Ibadan

Mokwa

Ibadan

Mokwa

Ibadan

Mokwa

Ibadan

Varieties (V)
2013 TZEE-W DT STR

11.8a

13.4a

178.3a

184.8a

524.3a

550.5a

2.47

2.57a

2013 TZEE-Y DT STR

10.5c

12.1c

172.7b

178.7b

448.6c

471.1c

2.31

2.39b

TZEE-W Pop C5

11.0b

12.5b

170.7b

176.5b

463.6c

486.7b

2.40

2.47ab

TZEE-Y Pop C4

11.1b

12.7b

173.3b

179.3b

463.2b

486.3b

2.42

2.52a

99 TZEE-Y STR QPR

10.9bc

12.5b

165.6c

171.1c

460.3bc

483.3bc

2.45

2.53a

S.E (+)

0.12**

0.13**

1.68**

1.82**

4.24**

4.45**

NS

0.06*

Urea rate (R)

0kgN

6.8f

8.4f

115.3g

119.2g

361.7f

379.8f

1.69e

1.74e

30kgN

8.9e

10.5e

149.6f

156.0f

431.1e

452.7e

2.02d

2.10d

30:30kgN

11.8c

13.3c

179.6c

185.9c

490.4c

514.9c

2.67b

2.76b

60kgN

9.5d

11.0d

170.6d

176.7d

468d

491.4d

2.79b

2.89b

60:30kgN

13.0b

14.3b

217.5a

 223.7a

508.1b

533.5b

3.13a

3.24a

30:30:30kgN

12.0c

13.6c

176.7c

183.3c

470.3d

493.8d

2.66b

2.76b

60:60kgN

13.7a

15.3a

205.5b

211.6b

540.5a

567.5a

2.20c

2.28c

30:60:30kgN

12.9b

14.5b

162.2e

168.3e

505.9b

531.2b

2.13cd

2.21cd

S.E (+)

0.16**

0.17**

2.13**

2.30**

5.36**

5.62**

0.05**

0.07**

Varieties x Rate

S.E (+)

0.38*

0.38*

4.76*

5.15*

11.98*

12.58*

0.11*

0.11*

Table 2 Effect of split N application rate on growth parameters of maize
WAS = Weeks after sowing, *, ** = Significant at 0.05 and 0.01 level of probability, respectively Mean followed by the same letter(s) within the same column and treatments are not significantly different. NL, number of leaves; PH, plant height; LA, leaf area; SG, stem girth

For maize varieties, the highest plant height, widest leaf area and the thickest stem girth recorded for variety 2013 TZEE-W DT STR at 8 WAS could be attributed to their genetic make-up. It was also reported by Msarmo and Mhango23 that cultivars grown under the same conditions may have differences in their performance based on the genetic characteristics. Amendment of soil by nitrogen fertilizer, irrespective of rates or period of application produced significantly better yield than 0kgN/ha. The data presented in Table 3, showed higher number of cobs at 60kgN/ha single applied (55.20x103 and 51.60x103) in both Mokwa and Ibadan respectively, while the lowest number of cobs produced was in the control plot (28.13x103 and 29.2x103) for both locations respectively. This result indicate that increase in N application do not show increase in number of cobs produced and environment did not have any effect on number of cobs produced in both locations, though mokwa agroecology brought about higher number in cob produced. The higher number of cobs experienced with N fertilizer application over the control may be due to the availability of Nitrogen nutrients throughout the growing season which is essential for optimum maize growth. This finding agrees with the earlier report of Bangarwa et al,24 and Khan et al.25 that the number of cobs produced by maize did not increase with the increase in nitrogen rates. Maize cob yield was greatly enhanced by varietal differences and split N application rates. Variety 2013 TZEE-W DT STR produced the best cob yield (3.33, 3.15 t ha-1) for both mokwa and Ibadan.

 

Number of cobs
    x 103 ha-1

  Cob yield

     (t ha-1)

Treatments

Mokwa

Ibadan

Mokwa

Ibadan

Varieties (V)

48.25a

45.33a

3.33a

3.15a

2013 TZEE WDT STR 

2013 TZEE YDT STR

48.00a

44.58ab

2.96b

2.72b

TZEE W POP C5

47.83a

46.42a

2.95b

2.81b

TZEE Y POP C4

48.17a

46.33a

2.69b

2.56b

99 TZEE Y STR QPR 

43.42b

41.83ab

2.37c

2.30c

S.E (+

1.02*

0.99**

0.94**

0.88**

Urea rate(R)

0kgN

28.13c

29.2c

0.59d

0.71d

30kgN

52.80a

49.33a

2.59c

2.42c

30:30 kgN

52.67a

49.6a

3.31b

3.07b

60kgN

55.20a

51.6a

2.65c

2.55c

60:30kgN

52.40a

48.8a

3.91a

3.73a

30:30:30kgN

45.47b

44.13b

3.30b

3.13b

60:60kgN

45.33b

43.2b

3.39b

3.13b

30:60:30kgN

45.07b

43.33b

3.14b

2.95b

S.E (+)

1.29**

1.26**

0.119**

0.112**

Varieties x Rate

S.E (+)

NS

NS

0.266**

0.250**

Table 3 Effect of split N application rate on plant stand at harvest, cob number and cob yield of maize
WAS = weeks after sowing, *, ** = Significant at 0.05 and 0.01 level of probability, respectively, Mean followed by the same letter(s) within the same column and treatments are not significantly different.

Varieties had no significant (p>0.05) effect on grain moisture content among the maize varieties at both locations. TZEE-Y Pop C4 had the highest grain moisture of (13.99 %) while the least grain moisture content was produced in 2013 TZEE-Y DT STR. Split N application rates showed significant effect on maize grain moisture content at Mokwa. The 90 kg N/ha split (60:30) applied at 2 and 4 weeks after sowing produced the highest cob yield (3.91 and 3.73 t ha-1), grain yield (2.99 and 2.80 t ha-1) and 1000 grain weight (432.2 and 414.9 g) in both Mokwa and Ibadan respectively. The least cob yield, grain yield and 1000 grain weight was recorded in the control plot with 0 kg N/ha in both locations. Cob yield of extra early maize was increased linearly with increase in N rates up to 90 kg N/ha. Split N application rate enhanced grain yield produced by extra early maize. This result agrees with Sanjeev and Bangarwa24 that grain yield increased with increasing nitrogen rates. Similar, findings was reported by Samira et al,26 Torbert et al.27 that found that yield and yield component of maize were increase by increasing the rate of nitrogen application rates. Increase in maize grain yield with an increase in the rates of nitrogen was also reported by Luschinger, Sabir et al,28 and Younas et al.29 in their investigations on nitrogen levels and maize grain yield. For 1000 grain weight, the data in Table 3 reveals that the treatments were significantly different from one another. The different rates of nitrogen fertilizer and time of application influenced the size of maize seed produced. All the treatments where N was applied resulted in higher 1000 grain weight compared with the control (Table 4).

 

Grain moisture
(%)

Grain yield/ha

1000 grain weight
(g)

( t ha-1)

Treatments

Mokwa

Ibadan

Mokwa

Ibadan

Mokwa

Ibadan

Varieties (V)

13.76

15.56

2.57a

2.38a

358.21

341.2

2013 TZEE WDT STR

2013 TZEE YDT STR

12.69

14.44

2.31b

2.08b

338.85

321.7

TZEE W POP C5

13.92

15.72

2.27bc

2.12b

350.77

333.5

TZEE Y POP C4

13.99

15.94

2.07c

1.93b

351.44

334.3

99 TZEE Y STR QPR

13.75

15.75

1.83d

1.73c

354.98

337.8

S.E (+

NS

NS

0.73**

   0.67**

NS

NS

Urea rate(R)

0kgN

12.21

13.61b

0.47d

0.55d

274.11e

257.1e

30kgN

13.36

14.78ab

2.01c

1.84c

325.34d

307.7d

30:30 kgN

12.25

14.56ab

2.60b

2.35b

369.11c

351.3c

60kgN

14.14

16.58a

2.04c

1.91c

395.63b

378.0b

60:30kgN

14.7

16.29a

2.99a

2.80a

432.16a

414.9a

30:30:30kgN

14.35

15.41ab

2.53b

2.37b

372.29c

355.7c

60:60kgN

13.84

16.05a

2.62b

2.36b

322.52d

306.1d

30:60:30kgN

14.15

16.6a

2.42b

2.21b

315.64d

298.9d

S.E (+)

NS

0.72*

0.92**

0.85**

6.39**

6.51**

Varieties x rate

S.E (+)

NS

NS

0.206*

0.191**

NS

NS

Table 4 Effect of split N Application rate on grain moisture, grain yield and 1000 grain weight of Maize
WAS = Weeks After Sowing, * = Significant at 5% level of probability, Mean followed by the same letter(s) within the same column and treatments are not significantly different at 5

Varietal difference had no significant (p<0.05) effect on 1000 grain weight produced by the extra early maize materials. The 1000 grain weight produced was comparable for both agro-ecologies. 1000 grain weight were increased as N application rate increases up till 90 kg N/ha split (60:30) applied at 2 and 4 weeks after sowing and started decreased at 120 kgN/ha split (30:30:30) applied. Nitrogen Use Efficiency (NUE), expressed as grain production per unit of N applied, indicated that, there were significant differences among the maize varieties tested on Nitrogen Use Efficiency (Table 5).  

 

Nitrogen use efficiency
               (%)

Treatments

Mokwa

Ibadan

Varieties (V)

33.01a

28.95a

2013 TZEE WDT STR 

2013 TZEE YDT STR

29.52ab

24.07bc

TZEE W POP C5

29.32ab

25.23ab

TZEE Y POP C4

27.07bc

23.00bc

99 TZEE Y STR QPR

22.74c

19.86c

S.E (+)

 1.67**

1.52**

Urea rate(R)

30kgN

51.3a

42.96a

30:30 kgN

35.63b

29.96b

60kgN

26.19c

22.58c

60:30kgN

28.08c

24.98bc

30:30:30kgN

22.95cd

20.21c

60:60kgN

17.94de

15.06d

30:60:30kgN

16.24e

13.79d

S.E (+)

 1.97**

1.79**

Varieties x rate

S.E (+)

   4.42*

  4.02*

Table 5 Effect of split N application rate on Nitrogen Use Efficiency of extra early maize
WAS = weeks after sowing. *, **= Significant at 0.05 and 0.01 level of probability, Mean followed by the same letter (s) within the same column and treatments are not significantly different at 5% level of probability

The Nitrogen use efficiency was greatly affected by varietal differences and split N application rates. Variety 2013 TZEE-W DT STR gave the highest nitrogen use efficiency in both Mokwa and Ibadan (33.01 and 28.95 %) respectively. The 99 TZEE-Y STR QPR recorded the least nitrogen used efficiency at both Mokwa and Ibadan (22.74 and 19.86 %). The observed NUE difference among the five extra early maize varieties is an indication that genetic characteristics of the materials played a major role in Nitrogen use efficiency as it agreed with the reports of Ahrens et al,30 and Hatfield and Prueger,31 who reported that agronomic practices and genotypes variability can affect Nitrogen Use Efficiency. Rate 30 kg N/ha single applied at 2 weeks after sowing had better nitrogen use efficiency in both Mokwa and Ibadan with (51.3 and 42.96 %) respectively, followed by the 60 kg N split (30:30) applied at 2 and 4 weeks after sowing in both Mokwa and Ibadan (35.63 and 29.96 %) respectively.

The lowest N application rate for Nitrogen use efficiency was found in application rate 120 kg N split (30:60:30) applied at 2, 4 and 6 weeks after sowing in both Mokwa and Ibadan (16.24 and 13.79 %) respectively. The result indicated that NUE decreases with increasing N application rate, also the split application rates significantly enhanced nitrogen use efficiency of the extra early maize when compared with single application of the same N rate. These results agree with the findings of Ali and Raouf,12 Raun and Johnson,32 Pierce and Rice,33 who earlier reported that high rates of nitrogen application decrease NUE in cereal. Halverson and Wienhold34 also established that Nitrogen use efficiency may be affected by crop species, soil type, and application rate of N fertilizer.35–39

Conclusion and recommendations

The maize variety 2013 TZEE-WDT STR in both locations had higher number of leaves, plant height, cob dry yield, and grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency at Mokwa and Ibadan respectively. Though, split application of 90kgN/ha at 2 and 4 WAS produce significantly higher 1000 grain weight, cob yield and grain yield at Mokwa and Ibadan respectively, it was 30kgN that efficiently utilized the N applied.

 The control produced significantly reduced cob yield and grain yield in both locations compared to the rest treatments, therefore growing extra early maize without adding supplement of N fertilizer should be discouraged. The 2013 TZEE-WDT STR is the best variety in terms of growth and yield of maize at the two locations. The N application rate of 30kgN/ha had the best nitrogen use efficiency across the varieties used in both locations, therefore blanket application of 30kgN/ha is recommended as basic requirement for extra early maize cultivation in both ecological zones for effective grain production though 60/30 N kg/ha gave optimum biological yield. Mokwa (9o18’N, 5o4’E) representing Southern Guinea Savanna showed to be a favourable environment to produce higher yield of maize using extra early maize varieties.

Funding

None.

Acknowledgments

None.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that there was no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Adetiminrin VO, Vroh BI, Menkir A, et al. Diversity analysis of elite maize inbred lines adapted to West and Central Africa using SSR markers. Maydica. 2008;53:143–149.
  2. Fakorede MAB, Badu Apraku B, Kamara AY, et al. Maize revolution in West and Central Africa. In: Badu Apraku B, Fakorede MAB, Ouedraogo M, editors. Maize Revolution in West and Central Africa. Proceedings of a Regional Maize Workshop; 2001 May 14–18; Nigeria. 2001.
  3. Badu Apraku B.  Effects of recurrent selection for grain yield and Striga resistance in an extra early maize population. Crop Science. 2010;50(5):1735–1743.
  4. Badu Apraku B, Akinwale RO, et al. Selection of early maturing maize inbred lines for hybrid production using multiple traits under Strigainfested and Strigafree environments. Maydica. 2010;55:261–274.
  5. Khalily M, Moghaddam M, Kanouni H, et al. Disections of Drought Stress as a Grain Production Constraint of Maize in Iran. Asian Journal of Crop science. 2010;2(2):60–69.
  6. Uribelarrea M, Crafts Brandner SJ, Below FE. Physiological N response of field–grown maize hybrids (Zea mays L.) with divergent yield potential and grain protein concentration. Plant and Soil. 2009;316:151–160.
  7. Uhart SA, Andrade FH. Nitrogen deficiency in maize: I. Effects on crop growth, development, dry matter partitioning, and kernel set. Crop Science. 1995;35(5):1376–1383.
  8. Sowers KE, Pan WL, Miller BC, et al. Nitrogen use efficiency of split nitrogen applications in soft white winter wheat. Agronomy Journal. 1994;86(4):942–948.
  9. Graham RD. Breeding characteristics in cereals. In: Tinker PB, Luchli A, editors. Advances in Plant Nutrition. New York: Prager; 1984. p. 57–90.
  10. Sattelmacher B, Horst WJ, Becker HC. Factors that contribute to genetic variation for nutrient efficiency of crop plants. Jounal of Plant Nutrition and soil science. 1994;157(3):215–224.
  11. Abd El Lattief EA. Nitrogen management Effect on the Production of Two Sweet Sorghum Cultivars under Arid Regions Conditions. Asian journal of crop science. 2011;3(2):77–84.
  12. Ali RN, Raouf SS. Effects of rate and nitrogen application timing on yield, agronomic characteristics and nitrogen use efficiency in corn. International Journal of Agriculture and Crop Sciences. 2012.
  13. Amanullah K. Source and rate of nitrogen application influence agronomic N–use efficiency and harvest index in maize (Zea mays L) genotypes. Maydica. 2014.
  14. Carangal VR, Ali SM, Koble AF, et al. Comparison of S1 with test cross evaluation for recurring selection in maize. Crop Science. 1971;11(5):658–661.
  15. Onasanya RO, Aiyelari OP, Onansanya A, et al. Effect of Different Levels of Nitrogen and Phosphorus Fertilizers on the Growth and Yield of Maize (Zea mays L.) in Southwest Nigeria. International Journal Agricultural Resources. 2009;4(6):193–203.
  16. Roth GW, Fox RH. Soil nitrate accumulations following nitrogen fertilizer corn in Pennsylvania. Journal Environmental Quality. 1990;19(2):243–248.               
  17. Paradkar VK, Sharma RK. Effect of  nitrogen  fertilization  on  maize  (Zea  mays) varieties  under  rainfed  condition.  Indian Journal Agron. 1993;38(2):303–304.
  18. Maqsood M, Abid AM, Iqbal A, et al. Effect of variable rate of nitrogen and phosphorus on Growth and yield of maize (golden). Journal Biological Science. 2001;1(1):19–20.
  19. Ayub M, Nadeem MA, Sharar MS, et al.  Response  of  maize  (Zea mays  L.) fodder  to different  levels  of  nitrogen  and phosphorus. Asian Journal of Plant Science. 2002;1(4):352–354.
  20. Sharar MS, Ayub M, Nadeem MA, et at. Effect of different rates of nitrogen and phosphorus on growth and grain yield of maize. Asian Journal of Plant Science. 2003;2(3):347–349
  21. Jones MJ, Wild A. Soils of the West African savannah. The maintenance and improvement of their fertility. 1975.
  22. Tweneboah CK. Modern Agriculture in the Tropics. Ghana: Co –Wood Publishers; 2000. p. 2–123.
  23. Msarmo K, Mhango W. Yields of Maize as Affected by Fertiliser Application Practices. Bunda College of Agriculture. 2000.
  24. Sanjeev K, Bangarwa AS. Yield and yield components of winter maize (Zea mays l.) as influenced by plant density and nitrogen levels. Agricultural Science Digest (Karnal). 1997;17:181–184.
  25. Khan MA, Khan NU, Ahmad K, et al. Yield of maize hybrid –3335 as affected by NP levels. Pakistan Journal Biological Science. 1999;2(3):857–859
  26. Samira M, Hussein A, Haikeland MA, et al. Effect of some preceding crops, hill spacing and nitrogen fertilization on yield attributes and grain yield of maize under reclaimed sandy soil conditions in East Delta. Proccedings of 8th Conference Agron; 1998 Nov 28–29; Egypt: Suez Canal Univ; 1998. p. 174–181.
  27. Torbert HA, Potter KN, Morrison JE. Tillage system, fertilizer nitrogen rate and timing effect on corn yields in the Texas Blackland prairie. Agronomy Journal. 2001;93(5):1119–1124.
  28. Sabir MR, Ahmad I, Shahzad MA. Effect of nitrogen and phosphorus on yield and quality of two hybrids of maize (Zea mays L). Journal of Agricultural Research. 2000;38(4):339–346.
  29. Younas MH, Rehman, Hayder G. Magnitude of variability for yield and yield associated traits maize hybrids. Asian Journal of Plant Science. 2002;1(6):694–696.
  30. Ahrens TD, Lobell DB, Ortiz monasterio JI, et al. Narrowing the agronomic yield gap with improved nitrogen use efficiency: a modeling approach. Ecological Applications. 2010;20(1):91–100.
  31. Hatfield JL, Prueger JH. Nitrogen Over –use, Under use, and Efficiency. In: New directions for a diverse planet. Proceedings of the 4th International Crop Science Congress; 2004 Sep 26–Oct 1; Brisbane, Australia. 2004. p. 21–29.
  32. Raun WR, Johnson GV. Improving nitrogen use efficiency for cereal production. Agronomy Journal. 1999;91(3):357–363.
  33. Pierce FJ,   Rice CW. Crop rotation and its impact of efficiency of water and nitrogen use. In: Hargrove, editors. Cropping Strategies for Efficient Use of Water and Nitrogen. USA: ASA Special Publication No.15; 1988. p. 101–113.
  34. Halverson AD, Wienhold BJ, Alfred L Black. Tillage and nitrogen fertilization influence grain and soil nitrogen in an annual cropping system. Agronomy Journal. 2001;93(4):836–841.
  35. Duncan BB. Multiple Range Test and multiple F Test. Biometrics. 1955;11(1):1–42.
  36. Luchsinger LA, Opazo AJD, Netra VO. Response of sweet corn to nitrogen fertilization investigation Agricola. 1999;19(1/2):9–18.
  37. Menkir A, Akintunde AO. Evaluation of the performance of maize hybrids improved open pollinated and farmers local varieties under well–watered and drought stress conditions. Maydica. 2001;46:227–238.
  38. Paponov, I.A., P. Sambo, G.E. Schulte, T. Presterl, H.H. Geigerand C. Engels. 2005. Grain yield and kernel weight of two maize genotypes differing in nitrogen use efficiency at various levels of nitrogen and carbohydrate availability during flowering and grain filling. Plant Soil, 272: 111 –123.
  39. Rizwan M, Maqsood M, Rafiq M, et al. Maize (Zea mays L.) response to split application of nitrogen. International Journal of Agricultural Biology. 2003;5(1):19–21.
Creative Commons Attribution License

©2020 Olaiya, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.