Submit manuscript...
MOJ
eISSN: 2381-182X

Food Processing & Technology

Research Article Volume 6 Issue 1

Dahi (Curd) preparation from milk with different levels of carrot (Dacus carota) juice

Md Touhiduzzaman Sarker,1 Adhita Sri Prabakusuma,2 Md Shahidul Islam3

1Department of Dairy Science, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Bangladesh
2Department of Food Technology, Universitas Ahmad Dahlan, Indonesia
3Department of Plant Pathology, Yunnan Agricultural University, China

Correspondence: Md Touhiduzzaman Sarker, Department of Dairy Science, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Bangladesh, Tel 8801722786986

Received: January 22, 2018 | Published: January 22, 2018

Citation: Sarker MT Prabakusuma AS, Islam MS. Dahi (Curd) preparation from milk with different levels of carrot (Dacus carota) juice. MOJ Food Process Technol. 2018;6(1):66-71. DOI: 10.15406/mojfpt.2018.06.00146

Download PDF

Abstract

The main purpose of the study was to measure the feasibility of incorporation of carrot juice in the manufacture of Dahi (curd). Four different types of Dahi were manufactured incorporating 0, 5, 10, and 15 percent carrot juice with whole milk. The prepared Dahi samples were tested through physical, chemical and microbiological analysis to evaluate their qualities. Data on different parameters were recorded and analyzed. It was found that the physical qualities of the Dahi improved by the addition of carrot juice with milk. The addition 5% of carrot juice shown better smell and taste. It also revealed that 15% carrot juice addition shown superior results for consistency as well as color and texture. Addition of carrot juice decreased the Fat content and pH Value but increased the protein content, total solids content, ash content and acidity (p<0.05). Dahi containing 5% carrot juice showed little better performance with respect to chemical qualities than the control (p<0.05). It further revealed that carrot juice increased the number of bacteria than the control Dahi. The study suggested that Dahi could be successfully manufactured incorporating 15% carrot juice. Production of greater volume of Dahi from reduced volume of whole milk incorporating a cheap additive like carrot juice might make Dahi product business more profitable and popular.

Keywords: curd, yogurt, carrot, juice, marketing, value chain, microbiological effect

Abbreviations

TS, total solids; CRD, completely randomized design; ANOVA, analysis of variance test; LSD, least significant difference

Introduction

Dahi is one of the oldest fermented milk products and is the most popular one in the Indian subcontinent. This product is known by different names in different countries of the world. In European countries, it is known as yogurt in the Middle Eastern countries the product has different names such as 'leben' in Egypt, 'Albany' in Syria and ‘Dahi’ in the Indian subcontinent. About 7% of the total milk production in India and 4% of the total production of Pakistan and Bangladesh is converted to Dahi for consumption.1 Many people of Bangladesh lead their livelihood by rearing cattle.2 Milking cow is an important asset for farmers for earning money by selling milk and milk products which helps to reduce their poverty.3–5 The dairy farmers of riverine island (char) areas are dependent on their milking cows.6,7 In the developing countries of Asia and Africa, yogurt is more likely to be produced as naturally soured milk and to be consumed by the adult more than fresh whole milk. It is generally considered as a safer product and its unique flavor carrot to so many that considerations are being given by nutritionists to incorporate inexpensive sources of nutrients. Different types of Dahi such as sweet Dahi, sour Dahi and flavored Dahi are found in the market. Sweet Dahi is generally prepared from a mixed culture of S. lactis, S. thermaphilus and S. citrophilus and sugar is usually added@8-12% volume of milk. The fermented products have therapeutic properties and high nutritive value. Flavoured Dahi is made by the addition of synthetic flavor or natural fruit juice (Table 1).

Components

Natural yogurt

Full fat

Low fat

Protein (%)

3.9

5

Fat (%)

3.4

1

Carbohydrate (%)

3.9

6.5

Table 1 Composition of natural yogurt

Mechanism of curd formation during dahi making

Fermentation in milk consist essentially the gradual conversion of lactose into lactic acids by lactose fermenting organisms. The lactose molecule is broken down by the enzyme lactase to glucose and galactose on its path way (glycolytic pathway) towards lactic acid. Each of the simpler sugars is further acted upon by several routes of lactic acid, and there can be several forms of acid end products.8 However, a portion of the acid combines with the calcium of casein to form calcium lactate, thus setting free the casein and coagulating it when its iso-electric point (pH 4.6) is reached. The calcium combine as CaHPO4 in milk goes completely into solution more rapidly than calcium combined as caseinate during souring.

C 12 H 22 O 11 + H 2 O Lactase Lacticacidbacteria C 6 H 12 O 6 + C 6 H 12 O 6 Lactose                                                         Glucose        Galactose    MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVCI8FfYJH8YrFfeuY=Hhbbf9v8qqaqFr0xc9pk0xbb a9q8WqFfeaY=biLkVcLq=JHqpepeea0=as0Fb9pgeaYRXxe9vr0=vr 0=vqpWqaaeaabiGaciaacaqabeaadaqaaqaaaOabaeqabaqcLbsaca WGdbWcdaWgaaqcfasaaKqzadGaaGymaiaaikdaaKqbGeqaaKqzGeGa amisaKqbaoaaBaaajuaibaqcLbmacaaIYaGaaGOmaaqcfayabaqcLb sacaWGpbWcdaWgaaqcfasaaKqzadGaaGymaiaaigdaaKqbGeqaaKqz GeGaey4kaSIaamisaSWaaSbaaKqbGeaajugWaiaaikdaaKqbGeqaaK qzGeGaam4taKqbaoaaoWcaleaajugibiaadYeacaWGHbGaam4yaiaa dshacaWGPbGaam4yaiaadggacaWGJbGaamyAaiaadsgacaWGIbGaam yyaiaadogacaWG0bGaamyzaiaadkhacaWGPbGaamyyaaWcbaqcLbsa caWGmbGaamyyaiaadogacaWG0bGaamyyaiaadohacaWGLbaakiaawk ziaKqzGeGaam4qaKqbaoaaBaaajuaibaqcLbmacaaI2aaajuaGbeaa jugibiaadIeajuaGdaWgaaqcfasaaKqzadGaaGymaiaaikdaaKqbag qaaKqzGeGaam4taKqbaoaaBaaajuaibaqcLbmacaaI2aaajuaGbeaa jugibiabgUcaRiaadoealmaaBaaajuaibaqcLbmacaaI2aaajuaibe aajugibiaadIealmaaBaaajuaibaqcLbmacaaIXaGaaGOmaaqcfasa baqcLbsacaWGpbqcfa4aaSbaaKqbGeaajugWaiaaiAdaaKqbagqaaa GcbaqcLbsaqaaaaaaaaaWdbiaadYeacaWGHbGaam4yaiaadshacaWG VbGaam4CaiaadwgacaGGGcGaaiiOaiaacckacaGGGcGaaiiOaiaacc kacaGGGcGaaiiOaiaacckacaGGGcGaaiiOaiaacckacaGGGcGaaiiO aiaacckacaGGGcGaaiiOaiaacckacaGGGcGaaiiOaiaacckacaGGGc GaaiiOaiaacckacaGGGcGaaiiOaiaacckacaGGGcGaaiiOaiaaccka caGGGcGaaiiOaiaacckacaGGGcGaaiiOaiaacckacaGGGcGaaiiOai aacckacaGGGcGaaiiOaiaacckacaGGGcGaaiiOaiaacckacaGGGcGa aiiOaiaacckacaGGGcGaaiiOaiaacckacaGGGcGaaiiOaiaacckaca GGGcGaaiiOaiaacckacaWGhbGaamiBaiaadwhacaWGJbGaam4Baiaa dohacaWGLbGaaiiOaiaacckacaGGGcGaaiiOaiaacckacaGGGcGaai iOaiaacckacaWGhbGaamyyaiaadYgacaWGHbGaam4yaiaadshacaWG VbGaam4CaiaadwgacaGGGcGaaiiOaOGaaiiOaaaaaa@E4F3@

C 6 H 12 O 6 Glycolyticpathway 4 C 3 H 6 O 3 Glucose                                Lacticacid MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVCI8FfYJH8YrFfeuY=Hhbbf9v8qqaqFr0xc9pk0xbb a9q8WqFfeaY=biLkVcLq=JHqpepeea0=as0Fb9pgeaYRXxe9vr0=vr 0=vqpWqaaeaabiGaciaacaqabeaadaqaaqaaaOabaeqabaqcLbsaca WGdbqcfa4aaSbaaKqbGeaajugWaiaaiAdaaKqbagqaaKqzGeGaamis aKqbaoaaBaaajuaibaqcLbmacaaIXaGaaGOmaaqcfayabaqcLbsaca WGpbqcfa4aaSbaaKqbGeaajugWaiaaiAdaaKqbagqaamaaFyaabaGa am4raiaadYgacaWG5bGaam4yaiaad+gacaWGSbGaamyEaiaadshaca WGPbGaam4yaiaadchacaWGHbGaamiDaiaadIgacaWG3bGaamyyaiaa dMhaaiaawEniaiaaisdajugibiaadoeajuaGdaWgaaqcfasaaiaaio daaKqbagqaaKqzGeGaamisaKqbaoaaBaaajuaibaGaaGOnaaqcfaya baqcLbsacaWGpbqcfa4aaSbaaKqbGeaacaaIZaaajuaGbeaaaOqaaK qzGeaeaaaaaaaaa8qacaWGhbGaamiBaiaadwhacaWGJbGaam4Baiaa dohacaWGLbGaaiiOaiaacckacaGGGcGaaiiOaiaacckacaGGGcGaai iOaiaacckacaGGGcGaaiiOaiaacckacaGGGcGaaiiOaiaacckacaGG GcGaaiiOaiaacckacaGGGcGaaiiOaiaacckacaGGGcGaaiiOaiaacc kacaGGGcGaaiiOaiaacckacaGGGcGaaiiOaiaacckacaGGGcGaaiiO aiaacckacaGGmbGaaiyyaiaacogacaGG0bGaaiyAaiaacogacaGGHb Gaai4yaiaacMgacaGGKbaaaaa@967E@

Cacaseinate+Lactic acidCalactate=casein( curd form ) MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVCI8FfYJH8YrFfeuY=Hhbbf9v8qqaqFr0xc9pk0xbb a9q8WqFfeaY=biLkVcLq=JHqpepeea0=as0Fb9pgeaYRXxe9vr0=vr 0=vqpWqaaeaabiGaciaacaqabeaadaqaaqaaaOqaaKqzGeaeaaaaaa aaa8qacaWGdbGaamyyaiabgkHiTiaadogacaWGHbGaam4Caiaadwga caWGPbGaamOBaiaadggacaWG0bGaamyzaiabgUcaRiaadYeacaWGHb Gaam4yaiaadshacaWGPbGaam4yaiaabccacaWGHbGaam4yaiaadMga caWGKbGaeyOKH4Qaam4qaiaadggacqGHsislcaWGSbGaamyyaiaado gacaWG0bGaamyyaiaadshacaWGLbGaeyypa0Jaam4yaiaadggacaWG ZbGaamyzaiaadMgacaWGUbqcfa4damaabmaakeaajugib8qacaWGJb GaamyDaiaadkhacaWGKbGaaeiiaiaadAgacaWGVbGaamOCaiaad2ga aOWdaiaawIcacaGLPaaaaaa@68DC@

Nutritive and therapeutic value of the carrot juice incorporated Dahi

Lactose intolerance: Numerous studies have shown that yogurt with live, active cultures is a well-tolerated alternative to milk for lactose malidigesters, even though it does not contain significantly less lactose than milk. Although 20 to 30% of the lactose in milk is hydrolyzed to glucose and galactose during yogurt fermentation, the total lactose content is often not lower than that of milk because of the non-fat milk solids added to many yogurts. The most likely explanation for this tolerance of yogurt which is supported by various studies is the presence of microbial beta-galactosidase the enzyme which breaks lactose down to its constituent’s glucose and galactose. Being intracellular, this bacterial enzyme survives gastric digestion and comes into play once in the intestine. As it is sensitive to freezing, though the enzymes offer or no activity in frozen yogurts.9

Protection against cancer: Studies relating yogurt intake to cancer form a melting pot of contradictory results. Whilst an inverse association was found between yogurt consumption and breast cancer, yogurt intake was positively linked ovarian cancer in another study. Findings from animal studies indicate do yogurt and its constituent microflora, lactobacilli, and bifido bacteria inhibit the growth or cause regression of transplantable or chemically induced tumors, but unfortunately, there is no concrete evidence of a similar benefit to humans.9

Protection against gastrointestinal infections: Consumption of yogurt containing live lactic bacteria may well interfere with the colonization and proliferation of food-borne pathogens, preventing gastrointestinal disturbance such as diarrhea, Scientists currently investigated the protective effect of Streptococcus thertwphilus.10 Lactobacillus bulgaricus and Lactobacillus acidophilus against these upsets and cite the following central characteristic abilities:

    1. Lowering intestinal pH, flavoring lactic acid bacteria.
    2. Competing with pathogens for essential nutrients
    3. producing antibacterial substances (bacteriocins)
    4. Neutralizing toxins.

Bifidobacterium spp has been pushed into the spotlight recently for its potential benefits in intestinal disorders. Although relatively little is known about it, the predominant organism in the intestine of breastfed infants has been shown to fight off a number of pathogens. It may also correct large bowel flora imbalance caused by antibiotics or conditions such as cancer, liver or kidney disease and impaired gastrointestinal function in the elderly.11

Protection against coronary heart disease and improves Immunity: The yogurt may reduce blood cholesterol and save from disease. Specific and non-specific immune mechanisms can be enhanced by in taking of live active bacteria which protect from pathogens, and viruses. The fermented milk products is increasing gradually so that farmers can easily find alternate uses of milk and maintain their livelihood, food and nutritional security.6,12 Dahi is one of the popular fermented milk products and a much-demanded item of diet for a human.10 The preparation of Dahi has been investigated by a number of research workers in different parts of the world.12–14 However, in Bangladesh limited number of works has been done in the preparation of fruit Dahi and no works has yet been done for prepared of Dahi incorporating of carrot juice with milk.

Carrot and its nutritive value: Carrots are grown around the year and popularly known as the vegetable. It is easy to grow, tasty and highly nutritious for children and adults. There are more than 100species of carrots ranging from not only in colors but also its size from as small as two inches to three feet. Carrots are the second most popular type of vegetable after potatoes which provide much nutrition for body. It bears vitamin B1, vitamin B2, vitamin B6, vitamin K, biotin, fiber, potassium, and thiamine (Table 2).

Components

In 100g

Water

87-88

Total Solid (TS)

13-Dec

Fat

0.19

Carbohydrate (CHO)

14-Oct

Protein

1

Calcium (Ca) mg

27

Phosphorus (P) mg

44

Energy (Kcal)

43

Vit C (mg)

9.3

Vit A (I.U)

2800

Folic acid

14

Table 2 Nutritional value of carrot

Dahi is one of the most important pleasant and charming foods in every country. It is extensively used chiefly along with other foods due to its good flavor and high food value. The preparation of Dahi has been investigated by a number of researchers in different parts of the world. But very few works have been done in Bangladesh in the preparation of fruit Dahi. The specific objectives of the study were (a) to study the feasibility of making Dahi by incorporating different levels of carrot juice with whole milk and (b) to recommend an appropriate technology and the level of carrot juice to be used for the preparation of a kind of fruit-flavored Dahi from whole milk.

Materials and methods

The present study was conducted at Dairy Science Laboratory of Bangladesh Agricultural University (BAU) during the period from March 1 to June 25, 2012. Chemical analysis was also done at Dairy Science Laboratory of Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, Bangladesh.

Preparation of carrot juice

The carrot was purchased from KR market of BAU campus Mymensingh, Bangladesh and brought to the laboratory for collecting juice. It was washed with distilled water. Then the carrot was cut into small parts with the help of knife then pieces of carrot were blended. After blending the juice was filtered by a clean cloth (hot water washed).

Preparation of plain Dahi (control) and carrot Juice dahi

Whole milk was collected from the vendors and local market of Mymensingh Town. Milk was boiled for sometimes to reduce about 20percent of original volume. Sugar was added to the milk at the rate of 8 percent during boiling. During heating, milk was stirred thoroughly with the help of a stirrer. After desired heating milk pan was taken out from the heater and allowed to reduce Temperature. When the temperature became about 40°C, then the milk was divided into four equal portions and different types of Dahi were prepared from each portion by using the different proportions of carrot juice (Table 3) discussed below:

Indicator

Percentage of carrot

1. Carrot juice

0% (Plain)

2. Carrot juice

5

3. Carrot juice

10

4. Carrot juice

15

Table 3 Indicators and percentage of carrot

The carrot juice was incorporated into yogurt at 5, 10 and 15% level in a different cup except for control. Juice was added before incubation with culture as suggested by Gandhi et al.14 and Singh.15 Heated milk was cooled to 40°C and inoculated with the desirable proportion of culture (2%) which was collected from Dairy farm, BAU. The plastic cups were pre-washed with boiled water before use. The samples were incubated at 37°C until the complete coagulation of Dahi samples. After complete coagulation (8-12hrs) the Dahi samples were stored at about 5°C under refrigeration until use.

Evaluation of prepared Dahi samples

Organoleptic test: The experiment was conducted three times and each time quality of prepared Dahi samples was evaluated with the help of physical, chemical and microbial tests. The parameter used to monitor the physical quality of Dahi samples were smell and taste, body and consistency and color and texture.

Chemical tests: After the organoleptic evaluations all Dahi samples were chemically analyzed in the laboratory for composition. The parameters were Total solids (TS) content (g/kg), Fat content (g/kg), Protein content (g/kg), Ash content (g/kg), Acidity content (%) and pH.11,17 Total solids and ash content of the different type of Dahi samples were determined by Oven drying method according to Association of Official Agricultural Chemists.16 Fat percent was determined by Babcock method using the procedure described by Aggarwala et al.16 Acidity was determined by titrating with N/10 sodium hydroxide solution using the procedure of Aggarwala et al.16 Crude protein was determined by Kjeldahl procedure and pH was measured with the help of a pH meter-215.17

Microbiological test: Standard Plate Count (cfu/g) and Coliform count (cfu/g) microbiological tests were done to determine the microbiological quality of different types of Dahi sample. Analysis of variance test (ANOVA) was done to find out the statistical difference between the means. In this experiment, all experimental materials were completely homogenous and for this reason, data were analyzed by using one-way analysis of variance test in Completely Randomized Design (CRD)18 using the MSTAT statistical program. Least significant difference (LSD) was determined for ranking the products.17,19

Results and discussion

The findings of the present study are presented in Tables 4-6. For ease of description, the results have been discussed under following four headings.

Physical parameters

Different types of Dahi samples

LSD value

Level of significance

A

B

C

D

Smell and Taste (50)

47.67c ±1.15

44.67c±0.58

43.67b ±0.58

47.33a ±0.58

0.65

**

Body and Consistency (30)

27.33a ±0.58

23.33c±0.58

26.33a ±0.58

23.67c ±1.15

0.65

**

Colour and Texture (20)

17.67ab ±0.58

16.67b±0.58

18.00a ±0.00

16.33b ±0.58

0.058

**

Total Score (100)

89b±0.68

83c±0.58

87b±0.58

90a±0.65

0.58

**

Table 4 Comparison of organoleptic parameters of plain Dahi carrot juice fortified Dahi

Different letters in the same row indicate a significant difference
**=Significant at p<0.05.
A=whole milk+0% carrot juice Dahi, B= whole milk+5% carrot juice Dahi, C= whole milk+10% carrot juice Dahi.

Parameters

Different types of Dahi

LSD value

Level of significant

A

B

C

D

Fat (g/kg)

37.7±0.42

36.9±0.58

35.2±0.35

33.8±0.33

0.38

NS

Protein (g/kg)

35.7a±0.10

31.4c±0.10

32.9b±0.10

34.7ab±0.10

0.1

**

Carbohydrate

141.8d±0.12

153.5c±0.12

162.5b±0.10

172.3a±0.10

0.11

**

(g/kg)

Ash (g/kg)

06.3c±0.01

06.9b±0.010

07.5ab±0.010

08.1a±0.006

0.03

**

TS(Total Solid) (g/kg)

222.8c±0.30

225.6c±0.49

238.1b±0.50

255.0a±0.53

0.42

**

PH

4.40a±0.10

4.23b±0.06

4.03c±0.06

3.90d±0.10

0.04

**

Acidity (%)

0.70d±0.02

0.83c±0.03

0.88b±0.03

0.93a±0.03

0.03

**

Table 5 Chemical composition of different type of Dahi

D= whole milk +15% carrot juice Dahi, Different letters in the same row indicate a significant difference
**=Significant at p<0.05.
Note: NS=Not significant; A=whole milk +0% carrot juice Dahi; B= whole milk +5% carrot juice Dahi; C= whole milk +10% carrot juice Dahi; D= whole milk +15% carrot juice Dahi.

Parameter

Types of Dahi

LSD value

Level of significant

A

B

C

D

Standard plate Count (cfu/g)

53.67c±5.69

63.67bc±5.13

73.33b±15.28

95.00a±22.91

15.13

**

Coliform count (cfu/g)

10.00±0.00

13.33±5.77

13.33±5.77

20.00±6.00

3.88

NS

Table 6 Microbiological parameters of different type of Dahi Samples

Different letters in the same row indicate a significant difference
**=Significant at p<0.05; NS, not significant.
Note: A=whole milk+0% carrot juice Dahi, B= whole milk+5% carrot juice Dahi, C= whole milk+10% carrot juice Dahi, D=whole milk+15% carrot juice Dahi.

Organoleptic parameters

Smell and taste: Smell and taste score of Dahi sample containing and A, B, C and D carrot juice was 47.67±1.15, 44.67±0.58, 43.67±0.58 and 47.33±0.58 respectively. The values are presented in Table 4. Statistical analysis showed that there was (P>0.01) significant difference within the smell and taste score of different types of Dahi. Higher smell and taste score was recorded in case of A and D level of carrot juice Dahi. On the other hand, the lowest score was seen in case of C type Dahi. The result of this experiment agrees with the work of Zaman et al.19 who found that addition of fruit juice improved the smell and taste score of Dahi. Similar results were also reported by Najgebauer-Lejko et al.10 Islam et al.17 also found that smell and taste of Dahi or yogurt were improved due to the addition of fruit juice.

Body and consistency: Body and consistency score of Dahi samples containing A, B, C and D were 27.33±0.58, 23.33±0.58, 26.33±0.58 and 23.67±1.15 respectively. The values are presented in Table 4. Statistical analysis showed that there was a significant difference in the body and consistency scores of different types of Dahi. Highest body and consistency score was found in case of C. On the other hand, lowest score was seen in case of B and D type Dahi. The result of this experiment agreed with the findings of Najgebauer-Lejko et al.,20 and Islam et al.17 Both of them found that body and consistency of Dahi or yogurt improved due to the addition of fruit juice.

Color and texture: The color and texture of A, B, C and D type’s levels of Dahi were 17.67±0.58, 16.67±0.58, 18.00±0.00 and 16.33±0.58 respectively. The values are presented in Table 4. Statistical analysis showed that there was a significant difference between the color and texture scores of different Dahi samples. The highest score of color and texture was recorded in case of C type Dahi and the lowest score was recorded for D type. The result of our experiment supports the findings of Desai et al.,13 who observed the addition of fruit juice improved the color and texture score of Dahi. In this connection, Manus LJ21 reported that course texture in yogurt was probably due to an imbalance of the Streptococcus thermophilus and Lactobacillus bulgaricus, resulting in overproduction of acetaldehyde which was the characteristic aroma compound in yogurt. The incorporation of carrot juice improved the organoleptic qualities of Dahi.

Total Score: The Total score of A, B, C and D type’s levels of Dahi were 89b±0.68, 83c±0.58, 87b±0.58, and 90a±0.65respectively. The values are presented in Table 4. Statistical analysis showed that there was a significant difference between the total scores of different Dahi samples. The highest total score was recorded in case of D type Dahi and the lowest score were recorded for B type. The result of our experiment supports the findings of Desai et al.,13 who observed the addition of fruit juice improved the total score of Dahi.

Different letters in the same row indicate a significant difference

Chemical parameters

Total solids: The average Total solids content of A, B, C and D types of Dahi were 222.8±0.30, 225.6±0.49, 238.1±0.50 and 255.0±0.53g/kg respectively Table 5. The highest Total solids content was found in D and the lowest in A type Dahi. Statistical analysis showed that there was a significant difference among the Total solids content of A, B, C and D type Dahi. The result agrees with the work of Cliff et al.,22 who found that total solids contents increased significantly due to the addition of fruits in yogurt. Islam et al.17 also conducted an experiment with different types of fruit juice and found that addition of fruit juice significantly increased the total solids content of Dahi.23

Fat: The average values for the fat content of A, B, C and D types of Dahi were 37.7±0.42, 36.9±0.58, 35.2±0.35, 33.8±0.33g/kg respectively Table 5. Statistical analysis showed that there was no significant difference between the fat contents of A, C, B, and D type Dahi. The result does not agree with the work of Desai et al.13 who found that fruit yogurt contained lower amounts of fat than the plain yogurt. A similar type of results was also obtained by Mustafa.24 Fat percent of plain sweet Dahi was studied by Cliff et al.22 and the fat percent of plain Dahi of this experiment is nearly similar to the findings of them.17,25

Protein: The average values of the protein content of A, B, C, and D type Dahi were 35.7±0.10, 31.4±0.10, 32.9±0.10 and 34.7±0.10, respectively Table 5. The protein content was higher in plain Dahi and lower in B. Statistical analysis showed that there was a significant difference in the protein content of A, C, B and D Dahi samples. The result agreed with the work of Islam et al.17 who found that plain Dahi contained a higher amount of protein than fruit Dahi. A similar type of result was also obtained by Islam et al.17

Carbohydrate: The average values of Carbohydrate content of A, B, C, and D type Dahi were 141.8±0.12, 153.5±0.12, 162.5±0.10 and 172.3±0.10g/kg respectively Table 5. The carbohydrate content was higher in D Dahi and lower in A type. Statistical analysis showed that there was a significant difference between the Carbohydrate contents of A, C, B and D Dahi samples. This result agrees with Desai et al.,13 who found that carbohydrate contents increased significantly due to the addition of fruits in yogurt.26

Ash: The average ash content of A, B, C and D types of Dahi was 06.3±0.01, 06.9±0.010, 07.5±0.010 and 08.1±0.006g/kg respectively Table 5. The highest ash content was found in D and the lowest ash content was found in A sample. Statistical analysis showed that there was a significant difference (p<0.05) within the ash contents of A, B, C and D Dahi samples. The findings of this study agree with the work of Mustafa24 and Desai et al.13 Both researchers found that addition of fruit juice increased the ash percentage in Dahi.

pH: The average pH values were 4.40±0.10, 4.23±0.06, 4.03±0.06 and 3.90±0.10, for the A, B, C and D types respectively Table 5. Addition of fruit slightly decreased the pH value of Dahi. It is well known that when pH value decreases then acidity increases.23 In this experiment acidity of carrot juice fortified Dahi increased which might be due to decreased pH values. The result of present findings agreed with the work of Islam et al.17 who found that pH of plain Dahi was 4.25. Kosikowski27 also reported that the pH of normal Dahi samples should be approximately 4.4.

Acidity: The average values of acidity percentage were 0.70d±0.02, 0.83c±0.03, 0.88b±0.03 and 0.93a±0.03 for A, B, C and D carrot juice made Dahi respectively (Table 5). Statistical analysis showed that the differences of acidity percentage among different treatments were significant. Acidity increased due to the addition of carrot juice.23 The results of acidity of Dahi samples agree with the findings of Desai et al.13 who found that the titratable acidity of fruit Dahi was significantly increased due to the addition of fruit juice/pulp. Mustafa24 prepared Dahi by using different types of seasonal juice and observed that acidity content of Dahi increased due to the addition of fruit juice in Dahi.

Microbiological

Total viable bacteria count (cfu/g): The total viable count per g of A, B C, and D types of Dahi were 53.67±5.69×104, 63.67b±5.13×104, 73.33±15.28×104 and 95.00±22.91×104per g respectively Table 6. Statistical analysis showed that there was significant difference p<0.05 among the different samples. This finding indicates that total viable count increase with the addition of carrot juice. The present investigation showed lower SPC values than those of Rahman28 who found that average total viable count was 2.80xl04/g in the jackfruit flavored Dahi.

Coliform count (cfu/g): The total coliform count per g of A, B C, and D types of Dahi were10.00±0.00, 13.33±5.77, 13.33±5.77 and 20.00±10.00cfu/g respectively Table 6. Statistical analysis showed that there was no significant difference among the different samples. This finding indicates that total coliform count almost similar to different sample which was an indication of hygienic production17,29,30 (Figure 1) .

Figure 1 Different types of Dahi prepared in the laboratory.

Conclusion

In this experiment, an attempt was made to prepare Dahi by adding different levels of carrot juice with whole milk. It was found that Dahi samples prepared by using 15% evaluation carrot juice scored highest for the total score (p<0.05) on organoleptic. Chemical analyses showed that the differences in fat percentage between plain and carrot juice made Dahi and among the different types of Dahi samples were insignificant. Differences of protein content in different Dahi samples was significant (p<0.05). It was reveal that by adding 15% carrot juice was shown better quality of the product better than other samples. Addition of carrot juice developed deep color in flavored of Dahi which was more attractive and nutritious, thus appreciated by a panel of judges. This study suggested to using 15% carrot juice with whole milk for preparing high quality fruit flavored Dahi. So, the manufacturers and the consumers might welcome to the incorporation of carrot juice in the manufacture of Dahi from whole milk.

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Shahjalal Animal Nutrition Field Laboratory of the Department of Animal Nutrition, Bangladesh Agricultural University (BAU), Bangladesh for giving an opportunity to this research.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this article.

References

  1. Behare P, Kumar H, Mandal S. Yogurt: yogurt based products. Encyclopedia of Food and Health. 2016. p. 625–631.
  2. Sarker MNI. Poverty of Island Char Dwellers in Bangladesh. Hamburg, Germany: Diplomica Publishing GmbH; 2016.
  3. Sarker MNI, Kashem MA, Rahman MZ. Poverty alleviation of rural people through chars livelihoods Programme. J Bangladesh Soc Agric Sci Technol. 2007;4(3-4):203–208
  4. Sarker MNI. Causes and possible solutions of seasonal food insecurity (Monga) perceived by char dwellers in Bangladesh. International Journal of Ecology and Development Research. 2016;1(1):002–009.
  5. Sarker MNI. Role of banks on agricultural development in Bangladesh. International Journal of Ecology and Development Research. 2016;1(1):010–015.
  6. Sarker MNI, Ali MA, Islam MS. Causes and possible solutions of poverty perceived by char dwellers in Bangladesh. International Journal of Natural and Social Sciences. 2015;2(1):37–41.
  7. Sarker MNI, Sultana A. An Investigation into the Status of riverbank (Char) women dwellers in Bangladesh. International Journal of Rural Development, Environment and Health Research (IJREH). 2017;1(1):86–92.
  8. Jenness R, Patton S. Principles of dairy chemistry. J Chem Educ. 1959;37(5):274
  9. Dairy Industries International. Claims about the healthy properties of live yogurt abound. Clare Penny reports on the latest investigations separating fact from fiction. 1991. p. 19–21.
  10. Najgebauer Lejko D, Grega T, Tabaszewska M. Yoghurts with addition of selected vegetables: Acidity, antioxidant properties and sensory quality. Acta Sci Pol Technol Aliment. 2014;13(1):35–42.
  11. Zaman MA, Ara A, Haque MN, et al. Chemical quality and economic status of Dahi available in Sylhet city. International Journal of Natural Sciences. 2016;6(2):75–78.
  12. Sarker MNI, Barman SC, Islam MM, et al. Role of lemon (Citrus limon) production on livelihoods of rural people in Bangladesh. Journal of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development. 2017;3(1):167–175.
  13. Desai SR, Toro VA, Joshi SV. Utilization of different fruits in the manufacture of yogurt. Indian Journal of Dairy Science. 1994;47(10):870–887.
  14. Gandhi DN, Madan L, Sachdeva M, et al. Publ. No. 156. National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal; 1977.
  15. Singh J. Physical and nutritional evaluation of yoghurt of tropical fruits low in calories. Indian J Dairy Sci. 1979;44(3):620–627.
  16. Aggarwala AC, Sharma SN. A laboratory manual of milk inspection. bombay, Calcutta, New Delhi, India. Official Methods of Analysis. 10th ed. Washington DC, USA: Association of Offrcial Agricultural Chemists (AOAC); 2003.
  17. Islam MN, Muzahid AAM, Habib R, et al. Preparation of Dahi from skim milk with different level of carrot juice. Bangladesh Journal of Animal Science. 2016;45(1):36–43.
  18. Steel RGD, Torrie JH. Principles and Procedures of statistics. New York, USA: Mc Grave-Hill Book Company. Inc; 1960.
  19. Islam M, Fakir MAH, Rahman MA, et al. Comparative assessment of Dahi (yogurt) collected from different areas of Bangladesh. International Journal of Natural and Social Sciences. 2017;4(3):17–25
  20. Najgebauer Lejko D, Grega T, et al. The effect of addition of selected vegetables on the microbiological, textural and flavour profile properties of yoghurts. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum, Technologia Alimentaria. 2015;14(1):45–53.
  21. Manus LJ. Factors influencing consistency and taste. Dairy and ice cream field. 1973;156:52–58.
  22. Cliff MA, Fan L, Sanford K, et al. Descriptive analysis and early-stage consumer acceptance of yogurts fermented with carrot juice. Journal of Dairy Science. 2013;96(7):4160–4172.
  23. Hussain SA, Patil GR, Yadav V, et al. Ingredient formulation effects on physico-chemical, sensory, textural properties and probiotic count of Aloe vera probiotic dahi. LWT-Food Science and Technology. 2016;65:371–380.
  24. Mustafa MD. A study on the preparation of fruit Dahi (yogurt). MS, Thesis, Dept. of Dairy Science, Mymensingh, Bangladesh: Bangladesh Agricultural University; 1997. p. 22–25.
  25. Yadav H, Jain S, Sinha PR. Production of free fatty acids and conjugated linoleic acid in probiotic dahi containing Lactobacillus acidophilus and Lactobacillus casei during fermentation and storage. International Dairy Journal. 2007;17(8):1006–1010.
  26. Raju PN, Pal D. Effect of bulking agents on the quality of artificially sweetened misti dahi (caramel colored sweetened yoghurt) prepared from reduced fat buffalo milk. LWT-Food Science and Technology. 2011;44(9):1835–1843
  27. Kosikowski F. Cheese and fermented milk products. New York, USA: Published by the author, Ithaca; 1996.
  28. Rahman SM. A study on the manufacture and shelf of jack fruit Dahi (yogurt).S. Thesis, Dept. of Dairy Sci. Mymensingh, Bangladesh: Bangladesh Agricultural University; 1998.
  29. Shaheen SMS, Uddin MJ, Islam MN, et al. Thermal effect on keeping quality of Yoghurt (Dahi). J Bangladesh Agril Univ. 2007;5(2):345–352.
  30. Suthar J, Jana A, Balakrishnan S. High protein milk ingredients - A Tool for value-addition to dairy and food products. Journal of Dairy, Veterinary & Animal Research. 2017;6(1):00171.
Creative Commons Attribution License

©2018 Sarker, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.