Research Article Volume 6 Issue 4
1School of Nursing Mkar, Gboko, Nigeria
2Department of Nursing Science, University of Maiduguri, Nigeria
3School of Midwifery Mkar, Gboko, Nigeria
Correspondence: Emmanuel O Chukwu, School of Nursing Mkar, P.M.B.19 Gboko, Benue State, Nigeria, Tel +2348065909485
Received: May 04, 2017 | Published: May 12, 2017
Citation: Chukwu EO, Fiase TM, Haruna H, et al. Predisposing factors to protein energy malnutrition among children (0-5years) in umuogele umuariam community in obowo local government area of Imo state, Nigeria. J Nutr Health Food Eng. 2017;6(4):108-115. DOI: 10.15406/jnhfe.2017.06.00206
This non-experimental, cross-sectional descriptive study assessed the “predisposing factors to protein energy malnutrition among children in Umuogele Umuariam Community, in Obowo Local Government Area of Imo State.” The target population comprised all the mothers in Umuogele Umuariam Community, in Obowo Local Government Area who has children (0-5years). The sample size consisted of 150 respondents who were selected using the convenient sampling technique after stratified sampling method. Data was collected from the mothers through self-structured and validated questionnaires. Data collected were presented in frequency and percentage. Mean scores were used to analyze the data. 2.50 was chosen as the bench mark (≥2.5 as criteria of acceptance). Inferential statistics (chi-square) (x2) was used to test the hypothesis at 0.05 level of significance. Findings revealed that the mothers do not have very good knowledge of protein-energy malnutrition, that ignorance on food nutrition, non-practice of exclusive breastfeeding and poor weaning methods were the major factors that predispose children to protein energy malnutrition. Result also shows that proper nutrition, exclusive breastfeeding and proper weaning can be an effective tool in reducing PEM among under five children. Based on the results, the researchers recommended that enhancement in both knowledge and practice is greatly required on the following areas of exclusive breast milk, initiation of breast milk, continuous feeding of breast milk and good dietary practices.
Keywords: predisposing, factors, protein-energy malnutrition, children
Nutrition is one of the cornerstones of maintaining health and preventing illness. According to Basavanthappa (2011), nutrition is the sum of all the interactions between an organism and the food it consumes. In other words, nutrition is what a person eats and how the body uses it. Nutrition is an essential principle which must be applied throughout the life cycle. Periods of nutrition emphases include during pregnancy, infancy, childhood, adolescence, adulthood and the “older” adult. The relationship between diet and health is strong. Protein energy malnutrition (PEM) is the term given to a group of clinical conditions which occur due to inadequate protein and calorie intake, especially in children. Protein energy malnutrition is a grave problem in developing countries as pregnant mothers do not eat enough nutrition and healthy food, which puts the baby at a disadvantage even before he/she is born. PEM has been classified in many ways, two important types are; Kwashiorkor and, Marasmus.
Kwashiorkor
Is a form of malnutrition most often found in children. It is caused by not eating enough protein, despite a reasonable intake of calories. It is common in areas of drought and famine. Symptoms may include irritability and fatigue followed by slowed growth, weight loss and muscle wasting, generalized swelling, skin change, enlargement of liver and abdomen and weakening of the immune system, leading to frequent infection.1 Children are affected by kwashiorkor more frequently than adults. It typically starts after the child has been weaned and breast milk has been replaced with a diet low in protein, although it can occur in infant if the mother is protein deprive.2 Kwashiorkor can also occur due to parasite and infections that can interfere with nutritional status. Left untreated, kwashiorkor can cause life threatening shock and coma. Treatment of kwashiorkor depends upon its severity. Fluid and electrolyte imbalances may need to be corrected with intravenous fluids, and infections may require treatment with antibiotics.
Marasmus
Is a severe form of malnutrition that consists of the chronic wasting away of fat, muscle, and other tissues in the body. Marasmus symptoms will vary depending on the severity and whether associated infections or other conditions are present. General symptoms of marasmus include chronic diarrhea, dizziness, fatigue and rapid weight loss. Marasmus is caused by inadequate amount of both protein and calories that are consumed, resulting in an energy deficit in the body. Treatment is based on nutritious, well balanced diet with lots of fresh fruits and vegetables, grains and protein.3,4
The primary type of PEM is purely due to dietary deficiency. This begins at the fetal stage and continues into infancy and childhood. Nearly 25% of the pediatric hospital beds in India are occupied by children suffering from malnutrition and around 80% of hospitalized children are malnourished to some extent, hence this contributes to the infant mortality ratio in a big way.5 Secondary malnutrition arises due to a serious illness like tuberculosis, cancer or inability of the body to absorb nutrients. For example in bowed disease like ulcerative colitis, metabolic syndromes and long standing gastro-enteritis. Dietary factors contributing to PEM are inadequate breast feeding by the mother due to inability of mother’s body to make milk due to inadequate nutrition, ignorance of weaning and weaning foods, inverted or cracked nipples in mother causing difficulty in breast feeding.6,7
The incidence of protein energy malnutrition in children have been the subject of extensive research for several decades, and studies shows that protein energy malnutrition affects the growth and development of children especially (0-5years). A well nourish child is one with access to adequate food supply, care and health, such a child will have weight and height measurements that compare very well with the standard normal distribution of height (H) and weight (W) of healthy children of the same age and sex. The best way to evaluate the nutritional status and overall health of a child is to compare the child’s growth indices with the set cult off points in the standard normal distribution of well-nourished children that are associated with adequate growth and development.8‒10
A healthy diet provides an adequate supply of all the nutrients that is necessary for best functioning of body cells;
Throughout the world, approximately 9% of children from below fiveyears of age are suffering from wasting, stunting and are at risk of several impairment in growth, psychological development and health.12 In Nigeria, incidence of PEM records stunting among children below fiveyears is 41%, wasting among children below fiveyears 14%, underweight approximately 23% severe underweight cases -32.6% stunting rate.13 World Health Organization (WHO) estimated that by the year 2014, the prevalence of protein energy malnutrition will have decreased to 17.6% globally. The prevalence of protein energy malnutrition rate has continued to rise in Africa and have risen from 24% to 26% and 47.3% to 45% respectively, since 1990-2010 with the worst increase occurring in the region of Africa.14
Design of Study
Cross-sectional descriptive survey method was used for this study to determine the incidence and treatment outcome of protein energy malnutrition among children in Umuogele Umuariam community in Obowo local government area of Imo state.
Target population
The target population consists of mothers in Umuariam Community in Obowo L.G.A of Imo State. Umuariam communities have about 260 estimated mothers having children 0-5.
Determination of Sample Size
Using the formula
Where n = sample size sought
N = population size
e = Level of significance chosen
1 = Constant
Level of significance chosen is 5% (0.05)
Therefore,
Therefore, the sample size=158
Sample/sampling technique
The researcher selected 31 mothers from each of the 5 villages in Umuariam community to make a total of 158 sample size using simple random sampling method. In order to pick respondents for the research, the mothers in each village were gathered in the village square and the ballot method without replacement was used. Here, “Yes” and “No” were written on papers and the papers were folded, then every member of the sample unit (mothers) was given equal opportunity to pick from the papers. Then, only those who picked the ones with “Yes” and obliged to participate in the study were selected as sample whereas those that picked the ones with “No” and those who picked “yes” but were not obliged to participate in the study were not selected as sample.
Instrument for data collection
A self-designed, structured questionnaire was used for data collection. The questionnaire was designed in line with the objective of the study. It has sections, with each section eliciting information on the research question.
The questionnaire has first introductory part, where the researcher introduces himself to his respondents, instructing them on what is expected of them and how to answer the questions. Section “A” of the questionnaire has to do with the socio-demographic data of the respondents. Section “B” was designed to initiate information on the research questions number one and correspondingly Section “C” and “D” taking care of research question 2 and 3.
Method for data collection
158 questionnaires was distributed by the researchers to all the mothers who were selected from the five villages in Umuariam community using simple random sampling method, making use of ballot paper method as described under sample and sampling techniques above. The questionnaires were given to the respondents at the village square and respondents who could not fill theirs immediately took it home and were given opportunity to return it to a predetermined office where the researchers went to retrieve them on the second day.
Method of data analysis
The demographic data obtained from the distributed questionnaires were analyzed and presented using frequency distribution table while mean scores were used to analyze the remaining data and interpreted as from which >2.50 as positive and ˂2.50 as negative. Chi-square (X2) was used to test the hypotheses at 0.05 level of significance.
The questionnaire distributed was 158 while 156 was returned out of which 150 was completely filled. The results are hereby presented in frequency distribution table according to research questions.
Marital status
The above table data reveals that out of 150 respondents, 20 (13%) were single, 90 (60%) were married, 10 (7%) were divorced, while 30 (20%) were widowed. This implies that majority of the respondents were married women.
Occupation
Data in the table above reveals that out of 150 respondents, 70 (47%) were civil servants, 30 (20%) were traders, 20 (13%) were house wife, while 30 (20%) were farmers.
Religion: Table 1 information above reveals that out of 150 respondents, 140 (93%) were Christians, 10 (7%) were Islam, whereas none of the respondents were Moslem and other this implies that 90% of respondents were Christians.
Marital Status |
Frequency |
Percentage (%) |
Single |
20 |
13 |
Married |
90 |
60 |
Divorced |
10 |
7 |
Widowed |
30 |
20 |
Total |
150 |
100 |
Educational Qualification |
Frequency |
Percentage (%) |
Primary |
20 |
13 |
Secondary |
40 |
27 |
Tertiary |
60 |
40 |
No formal education |
30 |
20 |
Total |
150 |
100 |
Occupation |
Frequency |
Percentage (%) |
Civil Servant |
70 |
47 |
Trading |
30 |
20 |
House Wife |
20 |
13 |
Farming |
30 |
20 |
Total |
150 |
100 |
Religion |
Frequency |
Percentage (%) |
Christianity |
140 |
93 |
Islam |
10 |
7 |
Pagan |
- |
- |
Others |
- |
- |
Total |
150 |
100 |
Number of Children |
Frequency |
Percentage (%) |
1-3 Children |
90 |
60 |
3-6 Children |
30 |
20 |
7 and Above |
30 |
20 |
Total |
150 |
100 |
Table 1 Demographic data of respondents N=150
Educational status
Data in Table 1 above reveals that out of 150 respondents, 20 (13%) completed primary school, 40 (27%) secondary school, 60 (40%) tertiary school, while 30(20%) did not have formal education, this implies that the highest educational attainment of majority of respondents was tertiary school.
Number of children
The Table 1 above shows that 90 (60%) of the respondents have Children ranging from 1-3 Children, 30 (20%) of them have 3-6 Children, while 30 (20%) have 7 Children and above.
Note :< 2.50 means negative, >2.50 means positive
From Table 2 above, some of the items in the table have mean scores above 2.50 and some below. The cluster mean of 2.50 shows that the mothers do not have very good knowledge of protein-energy malnutrition.
S.No |
Items |
SA |
A |
D |
SD |
Mean |
Remark |
1 |
MOTHER have heard about protein energy malnutrition |
27 |
33 |
44 |
46 |
2.27 |
|
2 |
Mothers have seen children suffered from PEM |
38 |
59 |
27 |
26 |
2.73 |
|
3 |
Mother have not experienced their children been sick |
14 |
27 |
53 |
56 |
1.99 |
|
4 |
Your children have been recommended to eat vegetable and beans |
47 |
69 |
26 |
9 |
3.02 |
|
Cluster Mean |
2.5 |
Table 2 Level of knowledge of the mothers on PEM N=150
Note :< 2.50 means negative, >2.50 means positive
From Table 3 above, all the items in the table have mean scores above 2.50. The cluster mean of 3.55 shows that ignorance on food nutrition, non-practice of exclusive breastfeeding and poor weaning methods were the major factors that predispose children to protein energy malnutrition.
S.No |
Items |
SA |
A |
D |
SD |
Mean |
Remark |
1 |
The most available food crop in your are is rich and yam |
63 |
57 |
17 |
13 |
3.13 |
|
2 |
There is vegetable in your area |
6 |
11 |
96 |
33 |
1.5 |
|
3 |
You give children eggs to eat |
9 |
15 |
39 |
87 |
1.64 |
|
4 |
Food taboo forbid eggs and other meat in your area |
43 |
81 |
22 |
4 |
3.09 |
|
5 |
You know protein given food items |
3 |
9 |
107 |
31 |
1.89 |
|
6 |
You practice exclusive breast feeding |
26 |
39 |
67 |
18 |
2.49 |
|
7 |
Pap is the most common food to introduce to children after breast feeding |
87 |
32 |
27 |
4 |
3.15 |
|
Cluster Mean |
2.47 |
Table 3 Predisposing factors to PEM N=150
Note :< 2.50 means negative, >2.50 means positive
From Table 4 above, all the items in the table have mean scores above 2.50. The cluster mean of 3.24 shows that the respondents agreed that preventive factors to PEM are multifactorial which borders mainly on education of mothers on food nutrition.
S.No |
Items |
SA |
A |
D |
SD |
Mean |
Remark |
1 |
Nursing mothers need lectures on child malnutrition |
68 |
74 |
5 |
3 |
3.38 |
|
2 |
Nursing mother need knowledge on food contents of food items |
67 |
78 |
4 |
1 |
3.48 |
|
3 |
Mothers need knowledge on the kinds of food to be given to children at each age and stage of development |
68 |
78 |
4 |
0 |
3.43 |
|
4 |
You are aware of food items and their respective classes (content) |
4 |
8 |
103 |
30 |
1.91 |
|
5 |
You are aware that a child can be malnourished |
98 |
47 |
5 |
0 |
3.62 |
|
6 |
lack of knowledge on food items with their contents can result to malnutrition |
64 |
69 |
17 |
0 |
3.31 |
|
7 |
Poverty contribute to malnutrition |
73 |
57 |
20 |
0 |
3.35 |
|
8 |
Women would like knowledge on balanced diet |
73 |
61 |
12 |
4 |
3.35 |
|
9 |
Women would like to cultivate crops that will make them have a balanced diet |
75 |
62 |
11 |
2 |
3.4 |
|
Cluster Mean |
3.24 |
Table 4 Preventive measures of PEM N=150
Hypothesis 1: Mothers have no knowledge on protein energy malnutrition
The calculated X2=1471.67
The tabulated X2 = 16.92
Since the Chi-square (X2) test (calculated) =1471.67 is greater than the tabulated value =16.92 There is therefore no statistical evidence to accept the null hypothesis (Ho). This means that the mothers have some degree of knowledge on PEM.
Hypothesis 2: There are no predisposing factors to protein energy malnutrition
The calculated X2=14483.08
The tabulated X2 = 28.87
Since the Chi-square (X2) test (calculated)=14483.08 is greater than the tabulated value =28.87. There is therefore no statistical evidence to accept the null hypothesis (Ho). This means that there are factors predisposing to PEM.
Hypothesis 3: There are no possible preventive measures to protein energy malnutrition
The calculated X2=2664.9
The tabulated X2 = 36.42
Since the Chi-square (X2) test (calculated) =2664.9 is greater than the tabulated value =36.42 There is therefore no statistical evidence to accept the null hypothesis (Ho). This means that there are preventive measures to PEM. (Table 5), (Table 6), (Table 7).
O |
E |
(E-O) |
(E-O)2 |
(E-O)2/E = X2 |
27 |
31.5 |
-4.5 |
20.25 |
0.64 |
33 |
8.3 |
24.7 |
610.09 |
73.5 |
44 |
11 |
33 |
1089 |
99 |
46 |
11.5 |
34.5 |
1190.25 |
103.5 |
38 |
31.5 |
6.5 |
42.25 |
1.23 |
59 |
8.3 |
50.7 |
2570.49 |
309.7 |
27 |
11 |
16 |
256 |
23.27 |
26 |
11.5 |
14,5 |
210.25 |
18.28 |
14 |
31.5 |
-17.5 |
306.25 |
9.72 |
27 |
8.3 |
18.7 |
349.69 |
42.13 |
53 |
11 |
42 |
1764 |
160.36 |
56 |
11.5 |
44.5 |
1980.25 |
172.2 |
47 |
31.5 |
15.5 |
240.25 |
7.63 |
68 |
8.3 |
59.7 |
3564.09 |
429.41 |
26 |
11 |
15 |
225 |
20.45 |
9 |
11.5 |
-2.5 |
6.25 |
0.55 |
Total |
1471.67 |
Table 5 Chi-square (X2) test on level of knowledge of mothers on PEM
O |
E |
(E-O) |
(E-O)2 |
(E-O)2/E = X2 |
63 |
9 |
54 |
2916 |
324 |
57 |
8.1 |
48.9 |
2391.21 |
295.21 |
17 |
2.4 |
14.6 |
213.16 |
88.82 |
13 |
1.9 |
11.1 |
123.21 |
64.85 |
10 |
9 |
1 |
1 |
0.11 |
96 |
2.4 |
93.6 |
8760.96 |
3650.4 |
33 |
1.9 |
31.1 |
967.31 |
509.06 |
9 |
9 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
15 |
8.1 |
6.9 |
47.61 |
5.88 |
39 |
2.4 |
36.6 |
1339.56 |
558.15 |
87 |
1.9 |
85.1 |
7142.01 |
3811.58 |
43 |
9 |
34 |
1156 |
128.44 |
81 |
8.1 |
72.9 |
5314.41 |
656.1 |
22 |
2.4 |
199.6 |
384.16 |
160.07 |
4 |
1.9 |
2.1 |
4.41 |
2.32 |
3 |
9 |
-6 |
36 |
4 |
9 |
8.1 |
0.9 |
0.81 |
0.1 |
107 |
2.4 |
104.6 |
10941.16 |
4558.82 |
31 |
1.9 |
29.1 |
846.81 |
445.69 |
26 |
9 |
17 |
289 |
32.11 |
39 |
8.1 |
30.9 |
954.81 |
117.88 |
67 |
2.4 |
64.6 |
4173.16 |
1738.82 |
18 |
1.9 |
16.1 |
259.21 |
136.43 |
87 |
9 |
78 |
6084 |
676 |
32 |
8.1 |
23.9 |
571.21 |
70.52 |
27 |
2.4 |
24.6 |
605.16 |
252.15 |
4 |
1.9 |
2.1 |
4.41 |
2.32 |
Total |
14483.08 |
Table 6 Chi-square (X2) test on predisposing factors to PEM
O |
E |
(E-O) |
(E-O)2 |
(E-O)2/E = X2 |
68 |
63.1 |
4.9 |
24.01 |
0.3 |
74 |
58.1 |
15.9 |
252.81 |
4.35 |
5 |
8.4 |
-3.4 |
11.56 |
1.38 |
3 |
4.9 |
-1.9 |
3.61 |
0.74 |
67 |
63.1 |
3.9 |
15.21 |
0.24 |
78 |
58.1 |
19.9 |
396.01 |
6.81 |
4 |
8.4 |
-4.4 |
19.36 |
2.3 |
1 |
4.9 |
-3.9 |
15.21 |
3.1 |
68 |
63.1 |
4.9 |
24.01 |
0.38 |
78 |
58.1 |
19.9 |
396.01 |
6.82 |
4 |
8.4 |
-4.4 |
19.36 |
2.3 |
0 |
4.9 |
-1.9 |
24.01 |
4.9 |
4 |
63.1 |
-59.1 |
2492.81 |
55.35 |
8 |
58.1 |
150.1 |
2510.01 |
43.21 |
108 |
8.4 |
99.6 |
9920.16 |
1180.97 |
30 |
4.9 |
25.1 |
6300.1 |
1285.73 |
98 |
63.1 |
34.9 |
1218.01 |
19.3 |
47 |
58.1 |
-11.1 |
123.21 |
2.12 |
5 |
8.4 |
-3.8 |
11.56 |
1.38 |
0 |
4.9 |
-4.9 |
24.01 |
4.9 |
64 |
63.1 |
0.9 |
0.81 |
0.01 |
69 |
58.1 |
10.1 |
118.81 |
2.04 |
17 |
8.4 |
8.6 |
73.96 |
8.8 |
0 |
4.9 |
-4.9 |
24.01 |
4.9 |
73 |
63.1 |
9.9 |
98.01 |
1.55 |
57 |
58.1 |
-1.1 |
1.21 |
0.02 |
20 |
8.4 |
11.6 |
134.56 |
16.02 |
0 |
4.9 |
-4.9 |
24.01 |
4.9 |
Total |
2664.9 |
Table 7 Chi-square (X2) test on preventive measures of PEM
Level of knowledge of mothers in umuariam community on protein energy malnutrition
From Table 2 above, some of the items in the table have mean scores above 2.50 and some below. The cluster mean of 2.50 shows that the mothers do not have very good knowledge of protein-energy malnutrition. This finding is in agreement with6 whose study on “Assessment of Knowledge of Mothers of Under five Children on Nutritional Problems: A Rural Community Based Study” showed that of the mothers surveyed, knowledge about under five nutritional problems and its prevention was reported to be nearly half of the mothers 27 (54%) had poor knowledge, around 19 (38%) had average knowledge, and only 4 (8%) had good knowledge regarding the common nutritional problems and its prevention. Mothers had poor knowledge on under five nutritional problems and its prevention. None of the mothers had very good knowledge. A significant number of mothers were unaware of the prevention and management of under five nutritional problems. The finding of the study is also supported by13 whose study showed that 42% of mothers been surveyed had an average level of knowledge about Protein Energy Malnutrition (PEM), 37% and 10% of them had poor and very poor level of knowledge and 11% of the mothers had good knowledge regarding PEM. The finding is also in agreement with14,15 who stated that ignorance of mothers about protein energy malnutrition is one of the causes of PEM among children of 0-5years especially in developing countries. The implication of this finding is that frequent health education campaigns should be conducted in the field of child nutrition among the mothers.
Predisposing factors to protein energy malnutrition in Umuariam community in Obowo L.G.A of Imo State
From Table 3 above, all the items in the table have mean scores above 2.50. The cluster mean of 3.55 shows that ignorance on food nutrition, non-practice of exclusive breastfeeding and poor weaning methods were the major factors that predispose children to protein energy malnutrition. This findings agrees with [11] whose study showed that PEM was more common among children from the lower social class (69.4%) and those predominantly breast fed for three months or less (48.6%) compared to exclusively breast fed children (18.9%). The reason for this may not be unconnected to the fact that poor families have low purchasing power for adequate nutritious foods for their families. Illiteracy on the other hand, may influence feeding practices. This finding also agrees with16,17 which holds that lack of breastfeeding can lead to protein energy malnutrition in infant and children. Possible reasons for this in the developing world may be that the average family thinks that bottle feeding is better.18 Also holds that mothers abandon breastfeeding because they do not know how to get their baby position properly or to suffer pain and discomfort during breastfeeding. The above finding also agrees with the finding of11 which showed that poor weaning of children is one of the predisposing factors to protein energy malnutrition. The implication of this finding is that enhancement in both knowledge and practice is greatly required on the following areas of exclusive breast milk, initiation of breast milk, continuous feeding of breast milk and good dietary practices.
Possible preventive measures of protein energy malnutrition among under fiveyears children in Obowo L.G.A of Imo State
From Table 4 above, all the items in the table have mean scores above 2.50. The cluster mean of 3.24 shows that the respondents agreed that preventive factors to PEM are multifactorial which borders mainly on education of mothers on food nutrition.
This means that exclusive breastfeeding and the combination of all the six classes of food are the preventive measures of occurrence of protein energy malnutrition in under five children. The above finding agrees with the finding of,19 which states that exclusive breastfeeding for at least six months is considered the best way to prevent early childhood protein energy malnutrition. This finding also agrees with20 which holds that lack of breastfeeding can lead to protein energy malnutrition in infant and children. Study by Nahar B et al.,21 also showed that proper nutrition can be an important way of reducing PEM among under five children. This means that exclusive breastfeeding can be an effective tool in reducing PEM among young children.
The nursing implication to this article is to improve health and quantity of life through prevention of protein energy malnutrition in their children (0-5years). This can be implemental by health educating the community, especially mothers on the importance of exclusive breastfeeding and proper weaning, to discourage the community against food taboos and also educate mothers on how to prepare readily available food resources.
The purpose of this research work is to determine the predisposing factors to protein energy malnutrition among children (0-5) in Umuariam Community in Obowo L.G.A of Imo State.
The objectives of the study are: To determine the level of knowledge of mothers in Obowo community on Protein Energy malnutrition, to identify the predisposing factors to protein energy malnutrition in the community, to determine the preventive measure of protein energy malnutrition in the community. Literature review was carried out in chapter two to review different opinions of other authors about protein energy malnutrition. Research method used was systematic and simple random sampling technique and data was collected using questionnaires. The data were analyzed using the following statistical tools: figure (bar chart and histograms) and tables. The results were then discussed. The findings revealed that ignorance, food taboo, non-practice of exclusive breastfeeding and poor weaning by mothers constitutes are major factors that predispose children to suffer protein energy malnutrition in the community.
It was revealed during the study that ignorance, food taboo & poor weaning of children by the mothers predispose their children to suffer protein energy malnutrition in Umuariam Community.
It is a statement of fact that the successful prevention of protein energy malnutrition among children will go a long way to promote healthy development. Based on the finding of this research, the researcher makes the following recommendations;
None.
Author declares that there is no conflict of interest
©2017 Chukwu, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.