Submit manuscript...
Journal of
eISSN: 2373-4310

Nutritional Health & Food Engineering

Research Article Volume 8 Issue 6

Changes in qualities of potato and potato-soy snacks during high temperature short time (HTST) air puffing

Nath A, Chattopadhyay PK

Post Harvest Technology, Division of Horticulture, ICAR Research Complex for NEH Region, India

Correspondence: Nath A, Sr. Scientist, Post Harvest Technology, Division of Agricultural Engineering, ICAR Research Complex for NEH Region, Umiam, Meghalaya, India, Tel +91-364-2570678, Fax +91-364-2570678

Received: December 21, 2017 | Published: November 28, 2018

Citation: Nath A, Chattopadhyay PK. Changes in qualities of potato and potato-soy snacks during high temperature short time (HTST) air puffing. J Nutr Health Food Eng. 2018;8(6):480-485. DOI: 10.15406/jnhfe.2018.08.00314

Download PDF

Abstract

Two different potato based ready-to-eat (RTE) snacks were prepared using high temperature short time (HTST) air puffing followed by oven toasting and evaluated for its nutritional changes that took place during high temperature short time air puffing and oven toasting process. The nutritional composition of initial samples before puffing and oven toasting and final products were measured in terms of moisture content (% db), protein (%), fat (%), ash (%), crude fiber (%), carbohydrates (%, by difference), ascorbic acid content (mg/100g), nitrogen solubility index (%), protein digestibility (%), trypsin inhibitor activity (%), calorific value (Kcal/100g) and protein energy ratio. Significant increase in protein (56.67%), ash (70.49%), crude fiber (27.2%) and protein energy ratio (63.20%) were recorded in RTE potato-soy snack as compared to RTE potato snack due to addition of soy flour (10.26%) in the product.

Keywords: ready-to-eat, potato, soy flour, nutrition, high temperature short time air puffing, oven toasting

Introduction

Consumers in the recent world are becoming increasingly aware of the relationship between diet and health. Thus, the demand for a balanced diet and nutrient composition of food products that address specific health benefits is growing steadily. Processing and cooking conditions cause changes in availability of different food nutrients. During production of ready-to-eat (RTE) foods, several changes in nutrient composition take place in processing steps and become very important for process formulation. The dehydration process, which is generally more widely applied to potatoes than to fruit and vegetables, can be very destructive to L-AA with losses of 75% being reported Mishkin et al.1 The effect of different combination of puffing temperature, puffing time, moisture content and air velocity on ascorbic acid content of ready-to eat dehydrated puffed potato cubes was reported by Mukherjee et al.2 It reported that the maximum ascorbic acid loss (14.48mg/100g dry matter) and minimum (3.12mg/100g dry matter) was observed at the process conditions of 175°C, 125 s, 45% (wb) and 3.6 m/s and150°C, 50 s, 35% (wb) and 3.0 m/s respectively. Haase et al.3 observed degradation of ascorbic acid during processing of French fries and potato chips. During processing total losses of ascorbic acid were about 52% for French fries and about 26% for potato chips respectively. Losses of vitamin C during processing depend on the degree of heating,4 leaching into the cooking medium, surface area exposed to oxygen and any other factors that facilitate oxidation.5

The effect of temperature in decreasing the activity of soy product trypsin inhibitors is well known and described in the literature.6 Thermal inactivation of trypsin inhibitors of soybean preparations added to meat was reported by Kozlowska et al.7 and they found heat treatments at 70 and 100°C for 5min reduced the trypsin inhibitor activity in the product by 40 and 70% respectively, in comparison with unheated samples. By extending the heating time upto 15min, further reduction of activity, by about 20 and 4% was caused at 70 and 100°C respectively while, Dublish et al.6 studied on nutritional quality of extruded rice, ragi and defatted soy flour blends and they observed extrusion cooking resulted in the inactivation of trypsin inhibitor activity and at 65 and 95±2°C the inactivation was 42.6-71.4 and 72.3-100%, respectively.

Nitrogen Solubility Index (NSI) is frequently used as indicators of protein functionality and potential end use.8 NSI is considered to be a good index of the potential use of a protein, providing information that is useful in snack foods processing and optimization. Several functional properties are directly related to this type of heat treatment.9 Heat treatment to the food materials leads to alterations in specific structure of the proteins. In many instances, increase in digestibility of the protein occurs, perhaps by opening of the complex structure which serves as the site for digestive enzyme.10 Bhole11 studied on the development of cereal-pulses based convenience food and it reported 14.72% and 5.54% increase in nitrogen solubility index and in vitro protein digestibility index respectively in the developed product. Quality evaluation of three canteen snacks: nutritative, fat and bacteriological was reported by Goyle et al.12 They observed that the energy contents of the snacks were in between 249 and 475 kcal/100g. There is no literature available on nutritional changes that took place during high temperature short time (HTST) air puffed potato and potato-soy snack production. Therefore, the present study was undertaken to evaluate the nutritional changes that took place during the production of RTE potato and potato-soy snacks.

Materials and methods

Preparation of potato flour

Potato flour was prepared from freshly harvested potatoes (Kufri chandramukhi) as per the method described by Nath et al.13 The potato flour obtained were packed in air-tight containers and kept in dry and cold place for future use.

Preparation of soy flour

Soy beans (Glycine max Cv. JS 335) were procured from local market and washed thoroughly with clean water. Immediately after washing and sorting, raw soybean seeds were blanched for 15min in hot water (100°C). Blanched soybeans were dehulled by manual rubbing. Splits obtained were steamed for 10 min. and then dried at 60°C for 5-6hours in hot air cabinet drier up to a final moisture content of 8-10%.14 The dried splits were ground in a domestic grinder (Sumeet Brand) for 15-20min and passed through the sieve (British Sieve Standards) to yield flour of 50 mesh size. The soy flour thus obtained was packed in air-tight containers for future use.

Sample preparation

RTE potato and potato-soy snack were prepared from potato flour dough with about 37% (wb) moisture content along with 2% NaCl and 10% soy flour added in total weight of potato flour respectively. Dolly pasta machine (LaMonferrina Make) was used to prepare a rectangular shape (15-20mm length, 10mm width and 1.5mm thickness) dimension chips from the dough. These chips were air puffed in a high temperature short time (HTST) fluidized bed air puffer specially designed and fabricated for the purpose Nath et al.15 These snacks were subjected to oven toasting13 for obtaining final RTE potato and potato-soy snack. The nutritional composition of initial samples before puffing and oven toasting and final products were measured in terms of moisture content, protein, fat, ash, crude fiber, carbohydrates (by difference), ascorbic acid content, nitrogen solubility index, protein digestibility, trypsin inhibitor activity, calorific value and protein energy ratio.

Moisture content

The moisture content of the samples at every stage of the process was determined by hot air oven method as described by Ranganna.16

Protein content

Protein Content was determined by AOAC17 method No. 2.049. Protein content was estimated as per equations given below:

nitrogen%=  [{Sample titre Blank titre} ×Normality of HCl × 4 × Volume made up of the digest × 100 Aliquot of the digest taken × Weight of the sample taken × 1000 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVCI8FfYJH8YrFfeuY=Hhbbf9v8qqaqFr0xc9pk0xbb a9q8WqFfeaY=biLkVcLq=JHqpepeea0=as0Fb9pgeaYRXxe9vr0=vr 0=vqpWqaaeaabiGaciaacaqabeaadaqaaqaaaOqaaKqzGeGaamOBai aadMgacaWG0bGaamOCaiaad+gacaWGNbGaamyzaiaad6gacaGGLaGa eyypa0deaaaaaaaaa8qacaGGGcqcfa4damaalaaabaqcLbsacaGGBb Gaai4EaiaadofacaWGHbGaamyBaiaadchacaWGSbGaamyza8qacaGG GcWdaiaadshacaWGPbGaamiDaiaadkhacaWGLbWdbiaacckacqGHsi slcaWGcbGaamiBaiaadggacaWGUbGaam4AaiaacckacaWG0bGaamyA aiaadshacaWGYbGaamyza8aacaGG9bWdbiaacckaiiaapaGae831aq RaamOtaiaad+gacaWGYbGaamyBaiaadggacaWGSbGaamyAaiaadsha caWG5bWdbiaacckacaWGVbGaamOzaiaacckacaWGibGaam4qaiaadY gacaGGGcWdaiab=Dna0+qacaGGGcGaaGinaiaacckapaGae831aq7d biaacckacaWGwbGaam4BaiaadYgacaWG1bGaamyBaiaadwgacaGGGc GaamyBaiaadggacaWGKbGaamyzaiaacckacaWG1bGaamiCaiaaccka caWGVbGaamOzaiaacckacaWG0bGaamiAaiaadwgacaGGGcGaamizai aadMgacaWGNbGaamyzaiaadohacaWG0bGaaiiOa8aacqWFxdaTpeGa aiiOaiaaigdacaaIWaGaaGimaaqcfa4daeaajugibiaadgeacaWGSb GaamyAaiaadghacaWG1bGaam4BaiaadshapeGaaiiOaiaad+gacaWG MbGaaiiOaiaadshacaWGObGaamyzaiaacckacaWGKbGaamyAaiaadE gacaWGLbGaam4CaiaadshacaGGGcGaamiDaiaadggacaWGRbGaamyz aiaad6gacaGGGcWdaiab=Dna0+qacaGGGcGaam4vaiaadwgacaWGPb Gaam4zaiaadIgacaWG0bGaaiiOaiaad+gacaWGMbGaaiiOaiaadsha caWGObGaamyzaiaacckacaWGZbGaamyyaiaad2gacaWGWbGaamiBai aadwgacaGGGcGaamiDaiaadggacaWGRbGaamyzaiaad6gacaGGGcWd aiab=Dna0+qacaGGGcGaaGymaiaaicdacaaIWaGaaGimaaaaaaa@DB68@  ...(1)

Protein = Nitrogen % × 6.25 …(2)

Crude fiber content

It was determined according to AOAC17 method No. 7.054. Crude fiber content was estimated as per Eq 3 and 4 shown below:

% crude fibre in ground sample = C = (lose in weight on ignition  loss in weight of asbestos bank) × 100 weight of the sample MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVCI8FfYJH8YrFfeuY=Hhbbf9v8qqaqFr0xc9pk0xbb a9q8WqFfeaY=biLkVcLq=JHqpepeea0=as0Fb9pgeaYRXxe9vr0=vr 0=vqpWqaaeaabiGaciaacaqabeaadaqaaqaaaOqaaKqzGeGaaiyjaa baaaaaaaaapeGaaiiOaiaadogacaWGYbGaamyDaiaadsgacaWGLbGa aiiOaiaadAgacaWGPbGaamOyaiaadkhacaWGLbGaaiiOaiaadMgaca WGUbGaaiiOaiaadEgacaWGYbGaam4BaiaadwhacaWGUbGaamizaiaa cckacaWGZbGaamyyaiaad2gacaWGWbGaamiBaiaadwgacaGGGcGaey ypa0JaaiiOaiaadoeacaGGGcGaeyypa0tcfa4aaSaaaeaajugibiaa cIcacaWGSbGaam4BaiaadohacaWGLbGaaiiOaiaadMgacaWGUbGaai iOaiaadEhacaWGLbGaamyAaiaadEgacaWGObGaamiDaiaacckacaWG VbGaamOBaiaacckacaWGPbGaam4zaiaad6gacaWGPbGaamiDaiaadM gacaWGVbGaamOBaiaacckacqGHsislcaGGGcGaamiBaiaad+gacaWG ZbGaam4CaiaacckacaWGPbGaamOBaiaacckacaWG3bGaamyzaiaadM gacaWGNbGaamiAaiaadshacaGGGcGaam4BaiaadAgacaGGGcGaamyy aiaadohacaWGIbGaamyzaiaadohacaWG0bGaam4BaiaadohacaGGGc GaamOyaiaadggacaWGUbGaam4AaiaacMcacaGGGcaccaWdaiab=Dna 0+qacaGGGcGaaGymaiaaicdacaaIWaaajuaGbaqcLbsacaWG3bGaam yzaiaadMgacaWGNbGaamiAaiaadshacaGGGcGaam4BaiaadAgacaGG GcGaamiDaiaadIgacaWGLbGaaiiOaiaadohacaWGHbGaamyBaiaadc hacaWGSbGaamyzaaaaaaa@B214@  ...(3)

% crude fibre on derived moisture basis = C × = (100  % moisture disived ( 100  % moisture in ground sample MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVCI8FfYJH8YrFfeuY=Hhbbf9v8qqaqFr0xc9pk0xbb a9q8WqFfeaY=biLkVcLq=JHqpepeea0=as0Fb9pgeaYRXxe9vr0=vr 0=vqpWqaaeaabiGaciaacaqabeaadaqaaqaaaOqaaKqzGeGaaiyjaa baaaaaaaaapeGaaiiOaiaadogacaWGYbGaamyDaiaadsgacaWGLbGa aiiOaiaadAgacaWGPbGaamOyaiaadkhacaWGLbGaaiiOaiaac+gaca GGUbGaaiiOaiaacsgacaGGLbGaaiOCaiaacMgacaGG2bGaaiyzaiaa csgacaGGGcGaaiyBaiaac+gacaGGPbGaai4CaiaacshacaGG1bGaai OCaiaacwgacaGGGcGaaiOyaiaacggacaGGZbGaaiyAaiaacohacaGG GcGaeyypa0JaaiiOaiaadoeacaGGGcaccaWdaiab=Dna0+qacaGGGc Gaeyypa0tcfa4aaSaaaeaajugibiaacIcacaaIXaGaaGimaiaaicda caGGGcGaeyOeI0IaaiiOaiaacwcacaGGGcGaamyBaiaad+gacaWGPb Gaam4CaiaadshacaWG1bGaamOCaiaadwgacaGGGcGaaiizaiaacMga caGGZbGaaiyAaiaacAhacaGGLbGaaiizaaqcfayaaKqzGeGaaiikai aacckacaaIXaGaaGimaiaaicdacaGGGcGaeyOeI0IaaiiOaiaacwca caGGGcGaamyBaiaad+gacaWGPbGaam4CaiaadshacaWG1bGaamOCai aadwgacaGGGcGaamyAaiaad6gacaGGGcGaam4zaiaadkhacaWGVbGa amyDaiaad6gacaWGKbGaaiiOaiaadohacaWGHbGaamyBaiaadchaca WGSbGaamyzaaaaaaa@A051@  ...(4)

  • Ash, fat and carbohydrate content

Ash content was determined according to AOAC.17 However, fat soluble material in snack food was extracted from an oven- dried sample using a Soxhlet extraction apparatus with solvent hexane. Fat content was estimated as per Eq 5 shown below:

% Fat content = Wt of fat-soluble material*100/Wt of sample ...(5)

The carbohydrate content was estimated by subtracting the values of moisture, protein, ash, crude fat and crude fiber from 100.

Ascorbic acid content

The ascorbic acid content of the samples was determined by visual titration method using 2, 6-dichlorophenol-indophenol (Ranganna, 1995).16 The ascorbic acid content of the sample was calculated by the formula:

Ascorbic acid content(mg/100g)= Titre×Dye factor×Volume made up×100 Aliquot of extract×Volume of sample MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVCI8FfYJH8YrFfeuY=Hhbbf9v8qqaqFr0xc9pk0xbb a9q8WqFfeaY=biLkVcLq=JHqpepeea0=as0Fb9pgeaYRXxe9vr0=vr 0=vqpWqaaeaabiGaciaacaqabeaadaqaaqaaaOqaaKqzGeGaaeyqai aabohacaqGJbGaae4BaiaabkhacaqGIbGaaeyAaiaabogacaqGGaGa aeyyaiaabogacaqGPbGaaeizaiaabccacaqGJbGaae4Baiaab6gaca qG0bGaaeyzaiaab6gacaqG0bGaaeikaiaab2gacaqGNbGaae4laiaa bgdacaqGWaGaaeimaiaabEgacaqGPaGaeyypa0tcfa4aaSaaaeaaju gibiaabsfacaqGPbGaaeiDaiaabkhacaqGLbGaae41aiaabseacaqG 5bGaaeyzaiaabccacaqGMbGaaeyyaiaabogacaqG0bGaae4Baiaabk hacaqGxdGaaeOvaiaab+gacaqGSbGaaeyDaiaab2gacaqGLbGaaeii aiaab2gacaqGHbGaaeizaiaabwgacaqGGaGaaeyDaiaabchacaqGxd GaaeymaiaabcdacaqGWaaajuaGbaqcLbsacaqGbbGaaeiBaiaabMga caqGXbGaaeyDaiaab+gacaqG0bGaaeiiaiaab+gacaqGMbGaaeiiai aabwgacaqG4bGaaeiDaiaabkhacaqGHbGaae4yaiaabshacaqGxdGa aeOvaiaab+gacaqGSbGaaeyDaiaab2gacaqGLbGaaeiiaiaab+gaca qGMbGaaeiiaiaabohacaqGHbGaaeyBaiaabchacaqGSbGaaeyzaaaa aaa@931C@ ...(6)

Protein digestibility index

In vitro protein digestibility was estimated by enzymatic method of Akeson et al.18 Digestibility was calculated using Eq 7 as shown below:

Protein digestibility (%)= N 2  in supernatant - N 2  in sample blank at zero hour N 2  in sample - N 2  in enzyme blank (in TCA) MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVCI8FfYJH8YrFfeuY=Hhbbf9v8qqaqFr0xc9pk0xbb a9q8WqFfeaY=biLkVcLq=JHqpepeea0=as0Fb9pgeaYRXxe9vr0=vr 0=vqpWqaaeaabiGaciaacaqabeaadaqaaqaaaOqaaKqzGeGaaeiuai aabkhacaqGVbGaaeiDaiaabwgacaqGPbGaaeOBaiaabccacaqGKbGa aeyAaiaabEgacaqGLbGaae4CaiaabshacaqGPbGaaeOyaiaabMgaca qGSbGaaeyAaiaabshacaqG5bGaaeiiaiaabIcacaqGLaGaaeykaiab g2da9KqbaoaalaaabaqcLbsacaqGobqcfa4aaSbaaeaajugWaiaabk daaKqbagqaaKqzGeGaaeiiaiaabMgacaqGUbGaaeiiaiaabohacaqG 1bGaaeiCaiaabwgacaqGYbGaaeOBaiaabggacaqG0bGaaeyyaiaab6 gacaqG0bGaaeiiaiaab2cacaqGGaGaaeOtaSWaaSbaaKqbagaajugW aiaabkdaaKqbagqaaKqzGeGaaeiiaiaabMgacaqGUbGaaeiiaiaabo hacaqGHbGaaeyBaiaabchacaqGSbGaaeyzaiaabccacaqGIbGaaeiB aiaabggacaqGUbGaae4AaiaabccacaqGHbGaaeiDaiaabccacaqG6b GaaeyzaiaabkhacaqGVbGaaeiiaiaabIgacaqGVbGaaeyDaiaabkha aKqbagaajugibiaab6eajuaGdaWgaaqaaKqzadGaaeOmaaqcfayaba qcLbsacaqGGaGaaeyAaiaab6gacaqGGaGaae4CaiaabggacaqGTbGa aeiCaiaabYgacaqGLbGaaeiiaiaab2cacaqGGaGaaeOtaKqbaoaaBa aabaqcLbmacaqGYaaajuaGbeaajugibiaabccacaqGPbGaaeOBaiaa bccacaqGLbGaaeOBaiaabQhacaqG5bGaaeyBaiaabwgacaqGGaGaae OyaiaabYgacaqGHbGaaeOBaiaabUgacaqGGaGaaeikaiaabMgacaqG UbGaaeiiaiaabsfacaqGdbGaaeyqaiaabMcaaaaaaa@A9F6@ ...( 7)

Nitrogen solubility index

It was determined according to BIS19 method No. 7837. The nitrogen solubility index of the sample was calculated by using Eq 8 and 9 as shown below:

Water soluble nitrogen, percent by mass= (V 1 V 2 )×N×0.014×100 M MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVCI8FfYJH8YrFfeuY=Hhbbf9v8qqaqFr0xc9pk0xbb a9q8WqFfeaY=biLkVcLq=JHqpepeea0=as0Fb9pgeaYRXxe9vr0=vr 0=vqpWqaaeaabiGaciaacaqabeaadaqaaqaaaOqaaKqzGeGaae4vai aabggacaqG0bGaaeyzaiaabkhacaqGGaGaae4Caiaab+gacaqGSbGa aeyDaiaabkgacaqGSbGaaeyzaiaabccacaqGUbGaaeyAaiaabshaca qGYbGaae4BaiaabEgacaqGLbGaaeOBaiaabYcacaqGGaGaaeiCaiaa bwgacaqGYbGaae4yaiaabwgacaqGUbGaaeiDaiaabccacaqGIbGaae yEaiaabccacaqGTbGaaeyyaiaabohacaqGZbGaeyypa0tcfa4aaSaa aeaajugibiaabIcacaqGwbWcdaWgaaqcfayaaKqzadGaaeymaaqcfa yabaqcLbsacqGHsislcaWGwbWcdaWgaaqcfayaaKqzadGaaGOmaaqc fayabaqcLbsacaGGPaaccaGae831aqRaamOtaiab=Dna0kab=bdaWi ab=5caUiab=bdaWiab=fdaXiab=rda0iab=Dna0kab=fdaXiab=bda Wiab=bdaWaqcfayaaKqzGeGaaeytaaaaaaa@76EA@ ...(8)

Nitrogen solubility index (NSI)= Water soluble nitrogen Total nitrogen ×100 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVCI8FfYJH8YrFfeuY=Hhbbf9v8qqaqFr0xc9pk0xbb a9q8WqFfeaY=biLkVcLq=JHqpepeea0=as0Fb9pgeaYRXxe9vr0=vr 0=vqpWqaaeaabiGaciaacaqabeaadaqaaqaaaOqaaKqzGeGaaeOtai aabMgacaqG0bGaaeOCaiaab+gacaqGNbGaaeyzaiaab6gacaqGGaGa ae4Caiaab+gacaqGSbGaaeyDaiaabkgacaqGPbGaaeiBaiaabMgaca qG0bGaaeyEaiaabccacaqGPbGaaeOBaiaabsgacaqGLbGaaeiEaiaa bccacaqGOaGaaeOtaiaabofacaqGjbGaaeykaiabg2da9Kqbaoaala aabaqcLbsacaqGxbGaaeyyaiaabshacaqGLbGaaeOCaiaabccacaqG ZbGaae4BaiaabYgacaqG1bGaaeOyaiaabYgacaqGLbGaaeiiaiaab6 gacaqGPbGaaeiDaiaabkhacaqGVbGaae4zaiaabwgacaqGUbaajuaG baqcLbsacaqGubGaae4BaiaabshacaqGHbGaaeiBaiaabccacaqGUb GaaeyAaiaabshacaqGYbGaae4BaiaabEgacaqGLbGaaeOBaaaaiiaa cqWFxdaTcaaIXaGaaGimaiaaicdaaaa@79CE@ ...( 9)

where, V1(volume in ml of alkali for back titration of blank); V2 (volume in ml of alkali for back titration of sample); N (normality of alkali) and M (mass of sample).

Trypsin inhibitor activity

Trypsin inhibitor activity was determined according to BIS19 method No. 7837.

Calorific value

Calorific values (kcal/100g) of both the raw materials and final products were calculated by summing up the multiplication of percent protein, fat and carbohydrate present in these materials by 4.04, 9.0 and 4.04 respectively.20

Protein energy ratio

The energy contributed by the protein to that of the total energy obtained from 100 g of the developed product was calculated by using Eq 10 as shown below:

Protein energy ratio= Total protein(%) Total energy (kcal/100g) MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVCI8FfYJH8YrFfeuY=Hhbbf9v8qqaqFr0xc9pk0xbb a9q8WqFfeaY=biLkVcLq=JHqpepeea0=as0Fb9pgeaYRXxe9vr0=vr 0=vqpWqaaeaabiGaciaacaqabeaadaqaaqaaaOqaaKqzGeGaaeiuai aabkhacaqGVbGaaeiDaiaabwgacaqGPbGaaeOBaiaabccacaqGLbGa aeOBaiaabwgacaqGYbGaae4zaiaabMhacaqGGaGaaeOCaiaabggaca qG0bGaaeyAaiaab+gacqGH9aqpjuaGdaWcaaqaaKqzGeGaaeivaiaa b+gacaqG0bGaaeyyaiaabYgacaqGGaGaaeiCaiaabkhacaqGVbGaae iDaiaabwgacaqGPbGaaeOBaiaabIcacaqGLaGaaeykaaqcfayaaKqz GeGaaeivaiaab+gacaqG0bGaaeyyaiaabYgacaqGGaGaaeyzaiaab6 gacaqGLbGaaeOCaiaabEgacaqG5bGaaeiiaiaabIcacaqGRbGaae4y aiaabggacaqGSbGaae4laiaabgdacaqGWaGaaeimaiaabEgacaqGPa aaaaaa@6DC4@ ...(10)

Statistical analysis

Paired samples T-test were conducted using the statistical software ‘SPSS, V-10’ to compare the mean values of RTE potato snack with RTE potato-soy snack. The null hypothesis was tested and level of significant difference was also recorded between the products.

Results and discussion

Preparation of potato flour and soybean flour

Potato slices were dried at a temperature of 60°C in a hot air cabinet drier for 4hours in a single layer and obtained flour of 100 mesh sizes with drying ratios of 5.68 and yield of 16.2% with moisture content of 9.45% (db). However, soybean flour of 50 mesh size was obtained from dried soybean (Glycine max Cv. JS 335) splits by grinding in a domestic grinder with final moisture content of 10.1% (db) and flour yield was recorded as 83.6%.

Proximate and nutritional compositions of raw materials

Potato flour, soy flour and defatted soy flour were analyzed for their proximate compositions and nutritional properties (Table 1). Potato flour was found to be rich in carbohydrate (75.52%) and ascorbic acid (41.76 mg/100g). It was observed that defatted soy flour was rich in protein (48.34%), ash (6.92%) and crude fiber (4.07%) as compared to full fat soy flour with protein (40.16%), ash (6.34%) and crude fiber (3.81%). Defatted soy flour was found 5.5 times higher in protein energy ratio as compared to potato flour. The proximate compositions of potato flour presented in Table 1 was found consistent with the results reported by Kulkarni et al.21–23 Jha24 reported 13-25% oil, 30-50% protein and 14-24% carbohydrate in soybean seed and these results are in agreement with the present findings. On the contrary, Akubor et al.25 reported higher values of carbohydrates (33%) and fat (18%) in soybean, which might be due to differences in agro-climatic conditions and varietal differences. Other nutritional compositions viz. nitrogen solubility index, protein digestibility index, energy value and protein energy ratio and were recorded as 65.70%, 83.44%, 342.05 kCal/100g and 0.024; 60.25%, 79.15%, 387.20 kCal/100g and 0.104; 62.25%, 81.37%, 365.90 kCal/100g and 0.132 respectively for potato flour, full fat and defatted soy flour (Table 1). However, trypsin inhibitor activity of full fat soy flour and defatted soy flour were recorded as 38.5% and 35.7% respectively which were much below the maximum prescribed limit of 55 units (BIS: 7836-1975 and 7837-1975).

Parameters

Potato flour

Soy flour

full fat

defatted

MC, %, db.

9.5

10.1

9.8

Fat, %, db.

0.46

12.4

1.3

Protein, %, db.

8.1

40.2

48.3

Ash, %, db

3.8

6.3

6.9

Crude fiber, %, db

1.6

3.8

4.1

Carbohydrates, %*

75.5

28.2

39.4

Ascorbic acid, mg/100g, db

41.8

0.00

0.00

Nitrogen solubility index, %

65.7

60.3

62.0

Protein digestibility index, %

83.4

79.2

81.4

Trypsin inhibitor activity, %

-

38.5

35.7

Energy, Kcal/100g

342.1

387.2

365.9

Protein Energy Ratio

0.02

0.10

0.13

Table 1 Proximate and Nutritional compositions of raw materials (potato flour and soy flour)

*By difference
MC, moisture content

Nutritional properties of RTE potato snack and RTE potato-soy snack during processing

The proximate composition and nutritional properties of RTE potato snacks and RTE potato-soy snacks (initial and final products) were analyzed and presented in Table 2. During processing the maximum loss of fat, protein, carbohydrates, ascorbic acid content and protein energy ratio were found to be 31.11%, 2.19%, 0.44%, 31.87% and 1.28% respectively for RTE potato snack and 27.69%, 2.25%, 0.53%, 30.12% and 1.05% respectively for RTE potato-soy snack while, the maximum loss of trypsin inhibitor activity was observed to be 63.66% for RTE potato-soy snack. Haase et al.3 also observed degradation of ascorbic acid during processing of French fries and potato chips. During processing total losses of AA were about 52% for French fries and about 26% for potato chips respectively. Losses of vitamin C during processing depend on the degree of heating, leaching into the cooking medium, surface area exposed to oxygen and any other factors that facilitate oxidation.5 The effect of temperature (i.e. processing) in decreasing the activity of soy product trypsin inhibitors is well known and described in the literature.26,6 Thermal inactivation of trypsin inhibitors of soybean preparations added to meat was reported by Kozlowska et al.7 and they found heat treatments at 70 and 100°C for 5min reduced the trypsin inhibitor activity in the product by 40 and 70% respectively, in comparison with unheated samples. By extending the heating time up to 15min, further reduction of activity, by about 20 and 4% was caused at 70 and 100°C respectively while, Dublish et al.6 studied on nutritional quality of extruded rice, ragi and defatted soy flour blends and they observed extrusion cooking resulted in the inactivation of trypsin inhibitor activity and at 65 and 95±2°C the inactivation was 42.6-71.4 and 72.3-100%, respectively. However, during processing the maximum increase of ash content, crude fiber, nitrogen solubility index and in vitro protein digestibility index were recorded to be 16.99%, 2.42%, 12.69% and 8.59% respectively for RTE potato snack and 11.15%, 5.39%, 11.52% and 8.84% respectively for RTE potato-soy snack. It is observed that due to processing Nitrogen Solubility Index (NSI) and Protein Digestibilty Index (PDI) values were also increased and this may due to the release of some protein fraction into the products during processing. NSI are frequently used as indicators of protein functionality and potential end use.8 NSI is considered to be a good index of the potential use of a protein, providing information that is useful in snack foods processing and optimization. Several functional properties are directly related to this type of heat treatment.9 Heat treatment to the food materials leads to alterations in specific structure of the proteins. In many instances, increase in digestibility of the protein occurs, perhaps by opening of the complex structure which serves as the site for digestive enzyme.10 Bhole11 studied on the development of cereal-pulses based convenience food and he reported 14.72% and 5.54% increase in nitrogen solubility index and in vitro protein digestibility index respectively in the developed product. Quality evaluation of three canteen snacks: nutritive value, fat and bacteriological was reported by Goyle et al.12 They observed that the energy contents of the snacks were in between 249 and 475 kcal/100g. These results are in agreement with the present findings.

Parameters

 

RTE potato
snack

Loss, %

Gain, %

RTE potato-soy
snack

Loss, %

Gain, %

Initial

 Final

Initial

Final

MC, %

35.6

3.3

90.7

 

35.6

3.4

90.6

 

Fat, %

0.45

0.31

31.1

 

0.65

0.47

27.7

 

Protein, %

8.2

8.0

2.2

 

12.9

12.6

2.3

 

Ash, %

3.7

4.3

 

16.9

6.6

7.3

 

11.2

Crude fiber, %

1.7

1.7

 

2.4

2.0

2.2

 

5.4

Carbohydrates, %*

77.5

77.2

0.44

 

69.4

68.9

0.53

 

Ascorbic acid, mg/100g

37.2

25.4

31.9

 

32.7

22.8

30.1

 

Nitrogen solubility index

66.4

74.9

 

12.7

62.3

69.5

 

11.5

Protein digestibility index

85.2

92.6

 

8.6

82.5

89.7

 

8.8

Trypsin inhibitor activity

-

-

 

 

3.6

1.3

63.7

 

Energy, Kcal/100g

350.4

347.00

0.96

 

338.1

333.8

1.3

 

Protein Energy Ratio

0.02

0.02

1.3

 

0.04

0.04

1.1

 

Table 2 Changes in nutritional properties of RTE potato and RTE potato-soy snacks during processing

* By difference
MC, moisture content; RTE, ready-to-eat

Comparison of nutritional properties of RTE potato snack with RTE potato-soy snack

The mean values of nutritional parameters for RTE potato snack and RTE potato-soy snack and their standard deviations are presented in Table 3. The null hypothesis was tested and there was highly significant difference recorded between the products. High significant difference (p ≤ 0.01) between RTE potato snack and RTE potato-soy snack were found except for moisture content in which it was non-significant (Table 3). Significant increase in protein (56.67%), ash (70.49%), crude fiber (27.2%) and protein energy ratio (63.20%) of RTE potato-soy snack as compared to RTE potato snack has been recorded due to addition of soy flour (10.26%) in the product. Laul et al.27 studied on the preparation of extruded finger shaped snack foods supplemented with defatted soybean to corn, broken rice and sorghum and they reported that addition of soy flour increased protein content in the finished product to 12% level. Soy flour incorporation in potato based foods like extruded and traditional type can, not only give better colored product, but will make more protein available for nutrition due to lesser formation of mailared product.28 These findings are in accordance with the present findings.

Parameters

Mean±SD

%
Variation

Standard error of
Mean

 Sig
(2-tailed)

RTE potato

RTE potato-soy

MC, %

3.3±0.047

3.4±0.049

0.90

0.03

0.441

Fat, %

0.31±0.023

0.47±0.016

51.6

0.02

0.000

Protein, %

8.0±0.093

12.6±0.053

56.7

0.04

0.000

Ash, %

4.3±0.041

7.3±0.098

70.5

0.05

0.000

Crude fiber, %

1.7±0.070

2.2±0.040

27.2

0.03

0.000

Carbohydrates, %*

77.2±0.684

68.9±0.336

-10.6

0.36

0.000

Ascorbic acid, mg/100g

25.4±0.186

22.8±0.186

-10.0

0.14

0.000

Nitrogen solubility index

74.9±0.380

69.5±0.509

-7.6

0.25

0.000

Protein digestibility index

92.6±0.207

89.7±0.449

-3.0

0.22

0.000

Trypsin inhibitor activity

0

1.3±0.100

 

0.04

0.000

Energy, Kcal/100g

347.0±15.313

333.8±1.625

-3.8

6.6

0.114

Protein Energy Ratio

0.02±0.000

0.04±0.000

63.2

0.00

0.000

Table 3 Comparison of nutritional properties of RTE potato snack with RTE potato-soy snack

 * By difference
MC, moisture content; SD, standard deviation; RTE, ready-to-eat

Conclusion

Significant changes in nutritional composition between RTE potato and RTE potato-soy snacks were observed during high temperature short time air puffing and oven toasting process. Addition of soy flour (10.26%) caused increase in protein (56.67%), ash (70.49%), crude fiber (27.2%) and protein energy ratio (63.20%). The maximum loss of trypsin inhibitor activity was observed to be 63.66% for RTE potato-soy snack.

Acknowledgements

This research was carried out and supported by the Indian Institute of Technology (IIT), Kharagpur, India

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicting financial or other interests.

References

  1. Mishkin M, Saguy I, Karel M. A dynamic test for kinetic models of chemical changes during processing: Ascorbic acid degradation in dehydrated potatoes. Journal of Food Science. 1984;49:1276–1274.
  2. Mukherjee S, Chattopadhyay PK. Whirling bed blanching of potato cubes and its effects on product quality. Journal of Food Engineering. 2007;78:52–60.
  3. Haase NU, Weber L. Ascorbic acid losses during processing of French fries and potato chips. Journal of Food Engineering. 2003;56(2):207–209.
  4. Alam MS, Amarjit S, Sawhney BK. Response surface optimization of osmotic dehydration process for aonla slices. J Food Sci Technol. 2010;47(1):47–54.
  5. Eitenmiller RR, Laden WO, Lin Ye. Ascorbic acid. In: Eitenmiller RR and Laden WO. Edn, Vitamin Analysis for the Health and Food Science. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1999;226–
  6. Dublish RK, Chauhan GS, Bains GS. Nutritional quality of extruded rice, ragi and defatted soy flour blends. Journal of Food Science and Technology. 1988;25(2):35–39.
  7. Kozlowska H, Elkowicz K, Rutkowski A. Thermal inactivation of trypsin inhibitors of soybean preparations added to meat. Meat Science. 1980;4:95-102.
  8. Hutton CW, Campbell AM. Functional properties of soy concentrate and soy isolate in simple systems-NSI and water absorption. Journal of Food Science. 1997;42(4):454–457.
  9. Mattil KF. The functional requirement of proteins in foods. Journal of American Oil and Chemical Society.1971;48:477–480.
  10. Phillips RD, Chhinnan MS, Mendosa LG. Effect of temperature and moisture content on kinetics of TIA, protein in vitro digestibility and nitrogen solubility of cowpea flour. Journal of Food Science. 48:1863.
  11. Bhole SN. Studies on the development of cereal-pulses based convenience food. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, PHTC, IIT, Kharagpur (W.B.), India. 1992.
  12. Goyle A, Dugar N. Quality evaluation of three canteen snacks: nutritive, fat and bacteriological. Indian Food Packer, 1994;1:53–
  13. Nath A, Chattopadhyay PK. Optimization of Oven Toasting for Improving Crispness and Other Quality Attributes of Ready to Eat Potato-Soy Snack Using Response Surface Methodology. Journal of Food Engineering. 2007;80(4):1282–1292.
  14. Khetarpaul N, Grewal RB, Goyal R, et al. Development of partially defatted soy flour and dhal. Food Chemistry. 2014;87:355–359.
  15. Nath A, Chattopadhyay PK, Majumder GC. High temperature short time air puffed ready-to-eat (RTE) potato snacks: process parameter optimization. Journal of Food Engineerin. 2007;80:770–780.
  16. Ranganna S. Handbook of Analysis and Quality Control for Fruits and Vegetable Products. 2nd Tata McGraw Hill Publishing Co. Ltd. New Delhi. 1995.
  17. Official methods of analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 14th ed, Washington, DC. 1984.
  18. Akeson WR, Stahmann MA. A pepsin-pancreatin digest index of protein quality. J Nutr. 1964;83(1):257–261.
  19. Specification for edible full-fat and low fat-soya flour. Optimum requirements, IS: 7836-1975 and 7837-1975. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi. 1975.
  20. Mudambi SR, Rajagopal MV. The nutrients. In: Fundamentals of Food and Nutrition. Wiley Eastern Ltd., New Delhi, 1983.
  21. Kulkarni KD, Kerure YE, Kulkarni DN. Evaluation of potato cultivars for flour production. Beverage and Food World. 1988;8: 214–221.
  22. Marwaha RS. Processing of potatoes: current status, need, future potential and suitability of Indian varieties - a critical appraisal. Journal of Food Science and Technology. 1997;34:457–471.
  23. Tripathi AK, Misra AK. Soybean- a consummate functional food: A review. Journal of Food Science and Technology. 2005;42(2):111–119.
  24. Murugkar DA, Jha K. Effect of sprouting on nutritional and functional characteristics of soybean. Journal of Food Science and Technology. 2009;46(3):240–243.
  25. Akubor PI, Ukwuru MU. Functional properties and biscuit making potential of soybean and cassava flour blends. Plant Food for Human 2003;55(1):1–12.
  26. Chauhan GS, Verma NS, Bains GS. Effect of extrusion cooking on nutritional quality of extruded rice-legume blends. Paper presented in 5th Indian Convention of Food Scientists and Technologists, 03-05 Apr, New Delhi, 1985.
  27. Laul MS, Bhalerao SD, Mulmuley GV. Studies on the preparation of extruded finger shaped snack foods with protein enrichment. Indian Food Packer. 1985;32:68–77.
  28. Kulkarni KD, Joshi KC. Potato starch soy-blends: Possible effects of starch properties on few aspects of end products. Indian Food Packer. 1992;66:38–
Creative Commons Attribution License

©2018 Nath, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.