Submit manuscript...
Journal of
eISSN: 2373-4310

Nutritional Health & Food Engineering

Research Article Volume 8 Issue 4

Acute oral intake of beta-hydroxybutyrate in a pilot study transiently increased its capillary levels in healthy volunteers

Annalouise O Connor, Jyh Lurn Chang, Milene Brownlow, Nikhat Contractor

Metagenics Inc, USA

Correspondence: Annalouise O’Connor, Metagenics Inc. 44th Ave. NW, Gig Harbor, WA, 98332, USA, Tel +253-853-7208, Fax 253-851-3923

Received: July 16, 2018 | Published: August 31, 2018

Citation: O’Connor A, Chang JL, Brownlow M, et al. Acute oral intake of beta-hydroxybutyrate in a pilot study transiently increased its capillary levels in healthy volunteers. J Nutr Health Food Eng. 2018;8(4):324-328. DOI: 10.15406/jnhfe.2018.08.00289

Download PDF

Abstract

The popularity of ketogenic diets has led to an increased interest in alternative approaches to inducing and sustaining ketosis. However, published information on the impact of exogenous ketone products in human subjects is lacking. This study aimed to characterize the circulating β-hydroxybutyrate (βHB) response in healthy men and women (n=10) following acute consumption of βHB salts. In a randomized, cross-over design, participants consumed placebo control or a combination of sodium and calcium βHB salts providing either 11.7g (full dose) or 5.85g (half dose) of βHB, with a wash-out period between intakes. Blood levels of βHB and glucose were measured and vital signs and adverse events were monitored over the following 4hours. Consumption of 11.7g βHB led to a significant increase in circulating βHB levels above 1 mmol/L within 15minutes compared with the placebo. Intake of the 5.85g of βHB led to increases in βHB levels between the full dose and the placebo. The rise in βHB was comparable to that seen in physiological ketogenic situations such as when following a ketogenic diet or periods of fasting, and did not approach the range seen with pathological conditions such as diabetic ketoacidosis. Blood glucose or blood pressure was not adversely impacted during the treatment period. Pulse was seen to modestly but significantly decrease with consumption of the full dose βHB. In conclusion, consumption of 11.7g βHB can lead to transient increases in capillary βHB in line with thresholds seen in nutritional ketosis conditions.

Keywords: ketogenic diet, nutritional ketosis, β-hydroxybutyrate, exogenous ketone, cross-over trial

Introduction

A ketogenic diet refers to a dietary approach that promotes nutritional ketosis by restricting carbohydrates (usually to less than 50g per day) and increasing the intake of fat with adequate consumption of protein. With a shortage of available glucose, fat from dietary source or stored adipose deposits is metabolized into ketone bodies [acetoacetate, β-hydroxybutyrate (βHB) and acetone] that can be utilized by the cells for energy.1 Systematic reviews and meta-analyses have reported the effectiveness of ketogenic diets in treating intractable epilepsy in adults and children,2,3 preventing an increase in appetite on reduced calorie diets,4 and achieving long-term bodyweight reduction.5 Emerging studies have shown that ketogenic diets may help diabetes management and improve exercise performance.6,7 However, compliance with a ketogenic diet can be difficult, as many have perceived the diet to be rigid or experienced adverse effects such as gastrointestinal disturbances.8,9 It has also been reported anecdotally as well as in the literature10 that, when following ketogenic diets or very-low-calorie diets (VLCD), there is a short lag time in the increase in circulating ketone bodies in conditions of reduced glucose intake, during which individuals report symptoms described as ‘keto flu’, including light headedness, irritability, fatigue and hunger. Hence, there has been increased interest in utilizing additional methods to enhance compliance and to facilitate the induction and maintenance of ketosis.

There has been a surge of commercially available products supplying exogenous ketones such as βHB salts. However, the oral response to such βHB salt formulations has been characterized in very few human studies. This report was intended as a proof-of-concept study to determine the circulating βHB concentration in response to acute, oral βHB supplementation. A lower dose was also investigated alongside a no-active placebo control.

Methods and materials

Study subjects

Participants were healthy adults aged 21-65y/o with normal body weight, with fasting glucose <5.55mmol/L (< 100mg/dL) and fasting ketones <1mmol/L at screening. Key exclusion criteria included: currently following a ketogenic diet (<50g carbohydrate per day) or on a weight loss program; use of medications or nutritional supplements which may influence study results; known allergy or hypersensitivity to study products; significant abnormalities in medical history or physical examination; current diagnosis of serious medical conditions; history of drug or alcohol abuse. Study procedures were in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and were approved by the Quorum Independent Review Board (Seattle, WA). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants before enrollment.

Study design

This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled cross-over trial in which βHB concentrations in capillary blood were evaluated following consumption of 2 different doses of βHB salts and a placebo. Each treatment took place on a different study day separated by a wash-out period of at least 48hours and not more than 1week. Participants attended the Functional Medicine Research Center (Gig Harbor, WA) following a 10hour overnight fast. Participants were advised on composition of evening meal prior to the study days, and were requested to avoid alcohol and physical activity the day before each study visit (Figure 1). The βHB salts or placebo were mixed with 12 oz water and consumed within 5 minutes. Blood was collected immediately prior to consumption, and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2 and 4hours post consumption via finger-stick for glucose and βHB assessments (Figure 1). During the 4hours post consumption period, all subjects were fasted and were permitted to consume plain water only throughout this time. Body weight was measured at each study visit, and vital signs (pulse, blood pressure, temperature, heart rate) were measured before product consumption and at 4hours post-consumption. AEs and tolerance information was recorded at the end of each study arm. Circulating glucose and ketone levels were determined using the commercially available monitoring system Precision Xtra™ (Abbott Diabetes Care Inc., Alameda, CA). The area-under-the-curve (AUC) for βHB was determined using the trapezoidal rule.

Figure 1 (A) Study design flow chart and (B) protocol at each clinic visit.

Study products

The full-dose and half-dose study products provided, respectively, 11.7g/serving and 5.85g/serving of βHB from calcium and sodium βHB in addition to flavors and excipients to improve product taste tolerability. The placebo control matched flavors and excipients to the full-dose βHB product. βHB was supplied by NNB Nutrition (Frisco, TX).

Statistical analyses

For normally distributed data, differences between treatment arms were assessed by repeated measures analysis of variance (RM-ANOVA) with post-hoc testing if significance was identified. Paired t-tests were used to assess within group differences between two time-points. Non-normally distributed data was transformed via log or square root transformation, and normal distribution re-examined. If normality could not be coaxed, Friedman test was used to assess differences between the three treatment groups, and Dunnett’s test for multiple comparisons used for post-hoc testing if a significant between-group difference was seen.

Results

All 10 participants (8 women and 2 men; all Caucasians) recruited for this study completed the study. Their mean age (mean±SD) was 31.4±12.0 y/o and mean BMI was 23.7±1.3. Baseline fasting βHB and glucose were 0.17±0.08mmol/L and 5.09±0.45mmol/L, respectively. Complete blood count and lab parameters were all within normal range (data not shown). The full-dose product (βHB-full) rapidly increased capillary βHB concentrations during the first 60 min reaching peak levels of 1.04±1.63mmol/L at 15min, and returned towards baseline values 2hours following intake (Table 1). The half-dose product (βHB-half) also resulted in an increase in βHB within the same timeframe, although the overall magnitude of the increase was less pronounced, and the βHB concentrations were not significantly different from placebo.

 

βHB-full

Placebo

βHB-half

P value
(main effect)

 

 

mmol/L

 

 

Baseline

0.15 (0.02)

0.19 (0.03)

0.17 (0.02)

0.252

1 min

1.04 (0.52)ac

0.17 (0.02)b

0.53 (0.11)bc

0.006

30min

0.69 (0.09)a

0.16 (0.02)b

0.48 (0.06)ab

<0.001

60min

0.57 (0.04)a

0.2 (0.02)b

0.3 (0.04)b

<0.001

120min

0.28 (0.03)

0.2 (0.02)

0.31 (0.08)

0.240

180min

0.22 (0.01)

0.27 (0.04)

0.21 (0.02)

0.239

240min

0.2 (0.03)

0.27 (0.05)

0.25 (0.02)

0.218

Table 1 Circulating βHB concentrations (mean±SE) from baseline to 4 hours post study treatment consumption

Differences between groups assessed with Friedman test, with Dunnett’s test for multiple comparisons used if overall group differences identified (p<0.05). Between-treatment differences denoted as a,b,c with treatments not sharing a letter considered significantly different (p<0.05).

Differences between groups assessed with Friedman test, with Dunnett’s test for multiple comparisons used if overall group differences identified (p<0.05). Between-treatment differences denoted asa,b,c with treatments not sharing a letter considered significantly different (p<0.05). Friedman test revealed a significant between-group difference in βHB AUC (Figure 2). Dunnett’s post-hoc tests identified a significant difference between βHB-full and placebo (p<0.001) but not between βHB-full and βHB-half (p=0.35). Mean βHB AUC for placebo was lower than βHB-half but the between-group difference did not reach statistical significance (p=0.08). No difference in blood glucose occurred in any of the treatment groups at any of the time points as assessed by RM-ANOVA (Figure 3). Paired t-tests did not identify any differences between baseline and 4hours for βHB-full, βHB-half, or for placebo.

Figure 2 βHB area-under-the-curve (AUC; mmol x h). Differences between groups assessed with Friedman test, with Dunnett’s test for multiple comparisons used if overall group differences identified. Between-treatment differences denoted asa,b with treatments not sharing a letter considered significantly different (p<0.05). Data expressed as mean±SEM.

Figure 3 Glucose response from baseline to 4 hours post consumption of βHB-full, placebo and βHB-half. Data expressed as mean±SEM.

There were no significant differences in any of the vital sign related variables at baseline between the 3 groups as assessed by RM-ANOVA (Table 2). The small but statistically significant increase in temperature (by a mean of 0.3oF) indicated potential influence of the study environment. There was a statistically significant reduction in pulse with βHB-full consumption. One individual reported mild loose stool after taking βHB-full and one reported moderate migraine after taking βHB-half although the individual had a history of migraine. Data displayed as mean (SE). Significant within-treatment arm differences between baseline and 4-hours are denoted bya,b. Time-points not sharing a letter are considered significantly different (p<0.05) as assessed by paired t-tests.

Product

 

Systolic BP (mmHg)

Diastolic BP (mmHg)

Pulse

(bpm)

Temperature

(◦F)

Weight

(lb)

βHB-full

Pre

112.6 (3.7)

67.8 (3.1)

63.6 (4.7)a

97.7 (0.1)a

153.7 (4.3)

Post

113.7 (3.9)

67.2 (3.8)

56.8 (4.0)b

98.0 (0.1)b

153.4 (4.3)

Placebo

Pre

114.8 (3.0)

71.4 (3.5)

59.8 (3.4)

97.7 (0.1)a

152.9 (4.4)

Post

112.5 (3.7)

69.7 (3.3)

58.8 (4.0)

98.0 (0.1)b

152.2 (4.4)

βHB-half

Pre

113.3 (3.7)

69.8 (2.3)

62.7 (2.8)

97.8 (0.1)a

154.2 (4.7)

Post

116.5 (3.6)

71.2 (4.4)

60.0 (3.6)

98.1 (0.1)b

153.8 (4.7)

Table 2 Vital signs and body weight pre-and-post study product consumption

Data displayed as mean (SE). Significant within-treatment arm differences between baseline and 4-hours are denoted by a,b. Time-points not sharing a letter are considered significantly different (p<0.05) as assessed by paired t-tests.

Discussion

In this study, consumption of 11.7g of βHB led to a significant increase in capillary βHB levels during the first hour compared to control. Increases in βHB with 5.85g of βHB (half dose) led to increases in βHB between full dose and placebo control. The magnitude of the rise in βHB was comparable to that seen in physiological ketogenic situations such as when following a ketogenic diet or periods of fasting,11 and did not approach the range seen with pathological conditions such as diabetic ketoacidosis. No severe gastrointestinal distress was observed.

When analyzing capillary specimens for βHB levels, we noticed data points from one subject (Subject 101) that might be potential outliers. For this subject, the circulating βHB measured 15min after the βHB-full and βHB-half intake was 5.2mmol/L and 1.3mmol/L, respectively, compared with 0.2-0.8mmol/L for the other 9 subjects. The circulating βHB measured 4h after the placebo intake for was 0.7mmol/L for this subject as opposed to 0.2-0.3mmol/L for the rest of the group (Supplementary Figure 1). The same statistical analysis excluding this subject revealed that the capillary βHB originally peaked at 15min after βHB-full intake was reduced to 0.58±0.23mmol/L - and the between-group difference did not reach statistical significance. Instead, it peaked at 30min at 0.62±0.08mmol/L. The rest of the results including AUC data remained similar (Supplementary Table 1 & Supplementary Figure 2). Whether the cause of the unusual βHB levels seen in this subject was due to hydration status, difference in ketone body metabolism, or measurement error remains to be explored.

 

βHB-full

Placebo

βHB-half

P value
(main effect)

 

 

mmol/L

 

 

Baseline

0.13 (0.02)

0.17 (0.02)

0.17 (0.02)

0.282

15 min

0.58 (0.23)a

0.17 (0.02)b

0.44 (0.23)ab

0.136

30 min

0.62 (0.08)a

0.16 (0.02)b

0.46 (0.06)a

<0.001

60 min

0.54 (0.04)a

0.19 (0.01)b

0.28 (0.04)b

<0.001

120 min

0.29 (0.03)

0.19 (0.02)

0.32 (0.09)

0.234

180 min

0.21 (0.01)

0.24 (0.03)

0.20 (0.02)

0.369

240 min

0.19 (0.03)

0.22 (0.01)

0.26 (0.03)

0.172

Supplementary Table 1 Circulating βHB concentrations (mmol/L) at baseline and 4 hours post study treatment consumption (n=9)

Differences between groups assessed with Friedman test, with Dunnett’s test for multiple comparisons used if overall group differences identified. Between-group differences denoted as a,b,c with treatments not sharing a letter considered significantly different (p<0.05).

Statistical analysis omitting βHB data from Subject 101

βHB-full resulted in a rapid increase in capillary βHB concentrations within 60minutes, with return towards baseline values thereafter. βHB-half also resulted in an increase in βHB within the same time-frame, although the overall magnitude of the increase was less pronounced (Supplementary Table 1).

Supplementary Figure 1 Circulating βHB concentrations from Subject 101 vs. group average (n=10; mean + SD).

Identification of potential outliers

Subject 101’s βHB level measured 15 min after the βHB-full and βHB-half intake was 5.2mmol/L and 1.3mmol/L, respectively. The circulating βHB measured 4 h after the placebo intake for was 0.7mmol/L for this subject as opposed to 0.2-0.3mmol/L for the rest of the group (Supplementary Figure 1).

Supplementary Figure 2 βHB area-under-the-curve (AUC; mmol x h). Between-treatment differences denoted as a, b with treatments not sharing a letter considered significantly different (p<0.05). Data expressed as mean±SEM.

βHB AUC data omitting Subject 101

Friedman test revealed a significant between-group difference in βHB AUC (Supplementary Figure 2). Dunnett’s post-hoc tests identified a significant difference between βHB-full and placebo control (p<0.001), with no significantly difference between βHB-full and βHB-half (p=0.095) or between βHB-half and control (p=0.06).

During our manuscript preparation, two human studies that included an objective similar to ours were published.12,13 In one of the experiments published by Stubbs et al.,12 15 participants ingested a dose of a combination of sodium and potassium βHB providing ~12g βHB, similar to our full dose, and the circulating βHB levels reached 1.0±0.1mmol/L (mean±SE) during the first hour. Although in our study the peak concentration occurred sooner; at 15minutes (or at 30minutes excluding data from the potential outlier), our AUC data were similar to theirs, and the βHB levels returned to baseline after 2hours in both studies. In the second publication,13 6 healthy adults ingested one dose of a combination of sodium and calcium βHB salts providing 30-57.5g depending on their bodyweight, but one subject immediately dropped out due to severe vomiting. The circulating βHB levels increased slowly and peaked at 2.5 hour post-consumption at 0.598±0.300 mmol/L (mean±SD), suggesting a different absorption rate. Glucose levels were not affected. However, multiple subjects experienced mild-to-moderate gastrointestinal discomfort after ingestion, indicating a dose level unsuitable for long-term application.

In our study, blood glucose or blood pressure were not adversely impacted by the βHB product, which is a relevant outcome considering that the subjects consumed the product while fasted and had fasting glucose levels within normal range (<5.55 mmol/L). This lack of acute ketone-inducing hypoglycemia is corroborated in the study by Stubbs et al.12 Another study by Stubbs et al.14 demonstrated that acute intake of exogenous ketone ester reduced plasma ghrelin levels and suppressed appetite in healthy individuals. Regarding concerns that exogenous ketone products may potentially increase mineral intakes, Stubbs et al. found that a high dose keto salt (~24g) significantly decreased blood potassium (below reference range for 1hour) and increased sodium but it remained within reference range.12 In comparison, the doses of keto salt in our study were much lower, although we used a sodium/calcium mixture instead of potassium/sodium mixture. Whether the mineral content in the exogenous ketone product results in any long-term health impact requires further investigation.

Conclusion

Our study provides evidence of acute-dose efficacy and safety of an exogenous βHB salt product. Exogenous ketone drinks may help support a ketogenic lifestyle—without the need for strict dietary changes—by facilitating the keto-adaptation process and by increasing βHB concentration to therapeutic levels in individuals already following a ketogenic diet. However, research on the safety and efficacy of exogenous ketones in humans is still scarce. It is of particular interest to better understand nutritional interventions that can support and facilitate the adoption of a ketogenic lifestyle, in addition to considering whether exogenous ketosis can elicit similar benefits observed with nutritional or endogenous ketosis.

Funding

The study was funded by Metagenics, Inc.

Acknowledgement

We thank Kimberly Koch for technical and clinical assistance.

Conflict of interest

All authors are employees of Metagenics, Inc.

References

  1. Fukao T, Lopaschuk GD, Mitchell GA. Pathways and control of ketone body metabolism: on the fringe of lipid biochemistry. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids. 2004;70(3):243–
  2. Ye F, Li XJ, Jiang WL, et al. Efficacy of and patient compliance with a ketogenic diet in adults with intractable epilepsy: a meta-analysis. J Clin Neurol. 2015;11(1):26–31.
  3. Rezaei S, Abdurahman AA, Saghazadeh A, et al. Short-term and long-term efficacy of classical ketogenic diet and modified Atkins diet in children and adolescents with epilepsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutr Neurosci. 2017:1–18.
  4. Gibson AA, Seimon RV, Lee CM, et al. Do ketogenic diets really suppress appetite? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2015;16(1):64–76.
  5. Bueno NB, de Melo IS, de Oliveira SL, et al. Very-low-carbohydrate ketogenic diet v. low-fat diet for long-term weight loss: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Br J Nutr. 2013;110(7):1178–1187.
  6. Feinman RD, Pogozelski WK, Astrup A, et al. Dietary carbohydrate restriction as the first approach in diabetes management: critical review and evidence base. Nutrition. 2015;31(1):1–13.
  7. Volek JS, Noakes T, Phinney SD. Rethinking fat as a fuel for endurance exercise. Eur J Sport Sci. 2015;15(1):13–20.
  8. Wheless JW. The ketogenic diet: an effective medical therapy with side effects. J Child Neurol. 2001;16(9):633–635.
  9. Cai QY, Zhou ZJ, Luo R, et al. Safety and tolerability of the ketogenic diet used for the treatment of refractory childhood epilepsy: a systematic review of published prospective studies. World J Pediatr. 2017;13(6):528–536.
  10. Krotkiewski M. Value of VLCD supplementation with medium chain triglycerides. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2001;25(9):1393–1400.
  11. Cahill GF. Fuel Metabolism in Starvation. Annu Rev Nutr. 2006;26(1):1–22.
  12. Stubbs BJ, Cox PJ, Evans RD, et al. On the Metabolism of Exogenous Ketones in Humans. Front Physiol. 2017;8(848).
  13. Fischer T, Och U, Klawon I, et al. Effect of a sodium and calcium DL-beta-hydroxybutyrate salt in healthy adults. Journal of Nutrition and Metabolism. 2018;2018:8.
  14. Stubbs BJ, Cox PJ, Evans RD, et al. A Ketone Ester Drink Lowers Human Ghrelin and Appetite. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2018;26(2):269–273.
Creative Commons Attribution License

©2018 O’Connor, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.