Submit manuscript...
Journal of
eISSN: 2574-8114

Textile Engineering & Fashion Technology

Research Article Volume 2 Issue 2

Reinforcing pop sheets with textile fabrics

Ashwin Thakkar, Laxmi Chaudhary Mehra

Department of Textile Technology, LD College of Engineering, India

Correspondence: Ashwin Thakkar, Department of Textile Technology, LD College of Engineering, Ahmadabad, India, Tel 98 7923 3838

Received: February 19, 2017 | Published: July 10, 2017

Citation: Thakkar A, Mehra LC. Reinforcing pop sheets with textile fabrics. J Textile Eng Fashion Technol. 2017;2(2):337-341. DOI: 10.15406/jteft.2017.02.00054

Download PDF

Abstract

POP sheets used for making false ceiling for the purpose of decoration or for technical reason. In the current study an attempt has been made to investigate effect of different Textile Fabrics on commercial plaster of paris (PoP) in a view to investigate the mechanical behavior of resultant PoP Sheets. Addition of small closely spaced and uniformly distributed fabric structure makes bond with PoP & uniform structure can help to act as crack arresters. It also can improve its mechanical strength, durability & safety concerns. As a result of this sort of uniform fabric structure the resultant plaster becomes little flexible from inside along with high strength provided by the outer materials.

The ability of the Textile Reinforced PoP Sheets to retain strength at the onset of matrix cracking has been analyzed; the Bending Stress results of Textile Reinforced PoP were compared with Plain PoP. It shows that Textile Reinforced PoP sheets are better in mechanical behavior in comparison to Plain PoP Sheets.

Keywords: composites, fibres, gypsum, plaster of paris, mechanical properties, reinforcement

Introduction

Plaster of Paris or Gypsum powder is basically a sedimentary rock which settled through the evaporation of sea water trapped in lagoons. The Gypsum boards are used extensively for variety of reasons like false ceiling, decoration etc. When used as false ceiling they sometimes pose a serious threat as it is prone to cracking. Major factors for development of cracks are: pressure, temperature, moisture, chemical attacks and ageing.1 So there is need to reinforce the Gypsum boards with the help of flexible yet stronger textile material.

As it is known that with reinforcement of textile fibre in concrete materials, novel repair and/or retrofit can be developed which would lead to substantially higher strengths, seismic resistance, ductility, durability than conventional methods. Many studies have shown that glass fibre-reinforced concrete materials possess appreciable toughness values. Here in this work focus is on PoP False ceiling sheets reinforced with different textile fabrics that are woven structured form of textiles. It can be a promising solutions or new way of resolving cracking problems & improving mechanical properties with high performance textile fabric reinforcement.1

Depending upon the technique, temperature, etc. different types of Plaster of Paris can be produced. Three forms of the Plaster of Paris are identified, namely (i) Alpha, (ii) Beta & (iii) Phospho-Gypsum (PoP). Alpha Plaster is the best quality & is used in Medical applications where as Beta plaster is used in high grade ceramic industries.Alpha plaster has found superior strength.2 The Building boards generally used as partitioning, paneling, cladding and false ceiling are mainly made from industrial wastes such as Phospho-Gypsum (Plaster of Paris).2

Materials used for textile reinforced pop boards

Gypsum plaster powder:3 Building boards generally used as partitioning, paneling, cladding and false ceiling shall be made from industrial wastes such as phospho-gypsum.3

Water: Potable water is generally considered satisfactory for mixing plaster. (Water-plaster ratio of 0.5 to 0.6)

Oil and greases: The oil and greases used in the preparation of benches and moulds for casting shall be such that it will leave the plaster surface of the product clean and unstained.

Fabric specimens: The reinforcing fabric samples were procured from different suppliers with varied specifications. The detailed specifications & physical properties are as given in Table 1.

S.No

Pop Sheets with & Without Textile Reinforcement

Fibre Composition

Weight (g/m2)

Warp Count (tex)

Weft Count (tex)

Fabric Weave

Supplier

Ends per Inch

Pick per Inch

Max. Load (kgf)

Extension (mm)

#ISO 4602

#ISO 4602

#ASTM D5034

#ASTM D5034

1

PLAIN PoP Board (W/o Textile Material)

Nil

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

2

Synthetic Grid

85% E-Glass+15% PP

500

400

400

Plain

Mill 1

8

8

200

7.2

3

Glass 1200 Tex

100% E Glass

610

1200

1200

Plain

Mill 2

25

25.8

195.5

6.1

4

Glass 600 Tex

100% E Glass

402

600

600

Plain

Mill 2

35.4

31.5

151

4.6

5

Glass 300 Tex

100% E Glass

360

300

300

Plain

Mill 3

63

55.6

164

5.6

6

Glass 4 Layer

100% E Glass

614

300

300

4 Layer

Mill 3

1,2,3,4th Layer: 301, 3, 4, 301 (g/m2)

1,2,3,4th Layer: 301, 3, 4, 301 (g/m2)

6.5

50.3

7

Polypropylene Grid

100% PP

485

400

400

Plain

Mill 1

9

9

150

6.5

8

HDPE Agronet

100% HDPE

400

200

200

Plain

Mill 1

15

15

170

8

9

NYLON Net

100% Nylon

350

200

200

Plain

Mill 1

12

12

140

7.5

Table 1 Textile Specifications used for Reinforcement of PoP sheets

Method of preparation

The Gypsum is heated to remove about ¾ of water and the process is called calcinations. This results in calcium sulfate hemihydrates of popularly known as Plaster of Paris (PoP). It is cooled immediately and stored in the powder form. During use water is added to rehydrate the powder and sets in to the mould during drying.3
The Process steps of preparation of Textile Reinforced PoP Sheets are as follows:

  1. A wooden frame 1 mm thinner than the thickness of the board required was laid over plain casting table having smooth trowelled surface or polished stone surface.
  2. The table was coated with a thin layer of oil to prevent plaster board sticking to the surface.
  3. Gypsum plaster was gauged to an even consistency free from lumps. This was spread evenly to cover the entire surface of the casting table within the mould to an even thickness of 6 mm and allowed to set partially.
  4. The textile reinforcement fabric specimen was laid evenly over the surface.
  5. The requisite amount of body plaster was then poured over the fabric, and the fabric was pressed and rolled down until it was thoroughly incorporated in the body plaster.
  6. The fabric was turned into the board to strengthen the edges and the whole board shall then be ruled to an even thickness.
  7. When the sheet hardened sufficiently, it was lifted and placed in racks or at separate place to dry.
  8. This way all pop resultant sheets were prepared.

The size of the board prepared was kept as: Length×Width×Thickness = 450×300×12 mm

Details of the test parameters

Tests:

Visual inspection: All boards shall be sound, free from cracks, broken edges and such other imperfections that would render them unfit for use.

Transverse bending strength: The transverse bending strength when tested in accordance with IS 2542(Part II). The test was carried out on UTM (Tinius Olsen Model H10KS). Figure 1 shows the arrangement for 3-point bending test as per IS 2542 (Part II).4

Figure 1 Three Point-Bending strength Testing Arrangements.

Results and discussions

After drying for 4 days at room temperature, the smooth specimens of dimensions 450×300×12 mm were loaded for three point bending test at a crosshead displacement rate of 5 mm/min, on Tinius Olsen UTM testing machine equipped with a 10 kN load cell and tested as per IS 2542, as shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2 Load calculations.

Load (P) in N & Extension (E) in % were recorded at the point of first damage in terms of prominent crack. Maximum Moment (M) in N.mm & Section Modulus (Z) in mm was calculated as per equations given below:

M = P/2*150 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVCI8FfYJH8YrFfeuY=Hhbbf9v8qqaqFr0xc9pk0xbb a9q8WqFfeaY=biLkVcLq=JHqpepeea0=as0Fb9pgeaYRXxe9vr0=vr 0=vqpWqaaeaabiGaciaacaqabeaadaqaaqaaaOqaaKqzGeaeaaaaaa aaa8qacaWGnbGaaiiOaiabg2da9iaabccacaWGqbGaai4laiaaikda caGGQaGaaGymaiaaiwdacaaIWaaaaa@3F5F@  (1)

Z = ( b*d ) 2 /6 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVCI8FfYJH8YrFfeuY=Hhbbf9v8qqaqFr0xc9pk0xbb a9q8WqFfeaY=biLkVcLq=JHqpepeea0=as0Fb9pgeaYRXxe9vr0=vr 0=vqpWqaaeaabiGaciaacaqabeaadaqaaqaaaOqaaKqzGeaeaaaaaa aaa8qacaWGAbGaaiiOaiabg2da9Kqba+aadaqadaGcbaqcLbsapeGa amOyaiaacQcacaWGKbaak8aacaGLOaGaayzkaaWcdaahaaqabeaaju gWa8qacaaIYaaaaKqzGeGaai4laiaaiAdaaaa@4332@  (2)

Where    b= Width =300 mm & d= thickness =12 mm

Finally bending stress (f) in N. mm2 was calculated as per following equation:

f= M/Z MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVCI8FfYJH8YrFfeuY=Hhbbf9v8qqaqFr0xc9pk0xbb a9q8WqFfeaY=biLkVcLq=JHqpepeea0=as0Fb9pgeaYRXxe9vr0=vr 0=vqpWqaaeaabiGaciaacaqabeaadaqaaqaaaOqaaKqzGeaeaaaaaa aaa8qacaWGMbGaeyypa0Jaaeiiaiaad2eacaGGVaGaamOwaaaa@3B92@  (3)

Also difference observed in mode of cracking was noted. For each specimen the recorded Load & Extension values & obtained Bending Stress are mentioned in Table 2. Please note, if the specimen in the transverse strength test fails at its centre, the transverse strength is equal to the flexural strength.

S. No

Pop sheets with & Without Textile Reinforcement

Elongation E (%)

Load P(N)

Max. Moment (M)
(N.mm )

Section Modulus (mm)

Bending Stress (N/mm2)

Mode of Cracking

Result Status

Relative Bending Stress

1

Plain (without reinforcement)

1.19

302.34

22675.82

7200

3.15

2 Pieces-sharp cut

FAIL

1

2

Synthetic Grid

12.39

725.25

54394

7200

7.55

Minor hairline crack

PASS

2.4

3

Glass 1200 Tex

16.45

428.7

32152.28

7200

4.47

Minor hairline crack

PASS

1.4

4

Glass 600 Tex

15.46

504.63

37846.98

7200

5.26

Delaminated

FAIL

1.7

5

Glass 300 Tex

15.81

550.34

41275.58

7200

5.73

Delaminated

FAIL

1.8

6

Glass 4 Layer

16.41

426.54

31990.41

7200

4.44

Delaminated

FAIL

1.4

7

Polypropylene Grid

17.38

397.6

29819.95

7200

4.14

Minor hairline crack

PASS

1.3

8

HDPE Agronet

19.02

358.75

26906.38

7200

3.74

Minor hairline crack

PASS

1.2

9

NYLON Net

14.08

374.64

28098.29

7200

3.9

Minor hairline crack

PASS

1.2

Table 2 Average Bending Stress values of Plain & Textile Reinforced Pop

Please note that in case of Plain PoP Sheets, a sudden & very sharp crack observed upon loading as the critical point reached in Figure 3a.

Whereas all Textile Reinforced PoP sheets with Synthetic Grid, Glass 1200 Tex, PP Grid, HDPE Agronet & Nylon Net, could make good bonding with PoP & even at comparatively higher loading no breakage occurred and only minor hair line crack observed in Figure 3b. It was observed that the open structure of fabric helped in achieving good bonding. On the onset of the first damage within the composites, the load is transferred onto the fabrics in the plane of the crack, which will be elastically stretched. We can say that elasticity property of Textile fabric can help to absorb sudden jerks.

The other sheets reinforced with Glass 600 Tex, Glass 300 Tex, and Glass 4 Layer Failed. One possible reason for the same can be very dense construction of fabric which could not make good bonding with Plaster layers & Delaminated at loading. However sheets are not broken but failed as Delaminated in Figure 3c.

  • (a)                     (b)                            (c)

    Figure 3 Plain pop Sheets.

    Our understanding can be clearer from below graphs. Figures 4-7 explain that all Textile Reinforced PoP sheet could bare more load. Synthetic grid, Open structured net gave the best results, shown 2.4 times i.e. 140% Higher Bending stress in comparison to Plain PoP. However cost point of view PP Grid is economical & gives 30% higher Bending stress than Plain PoP. HDPE Agronet & Nylon net also shows 20% increase in Bending Stress values .

    Figure 4 Sheets under loading (Load in N).

    Figure 5 Sheets under loading (Load in kgf).

    Figure 6 Elongation %.

    Figure 7 Bending stress [N.mm2].

    Summary

    The cost of civil infrastructure constitutes a major portion of the national wealth. Its rapid deterioration has thus created an urgent need for the development of novel, long-lasting and safe methods for repair, retrofit and new construction.

    1. A promising new way of resolving this problem is to selectively use advanced composites, such as High-Performance Glass fabric Reinforced PoP for false ceiling. Synthetic Grid fabric with open structure achieved the best results during the experiment. It did not break but developed just minor hairline crack. Also there was no delamination observed.
    2. When tried with PP mesh, similar structure that too gave 1.3 times higher strength with minor hairline crack. PP is economical too. Thus the shear stress at tension cracking decreases.

    With Textile Reinforcement, PoP becomes flexible from inner side along with high strength provided by the outer materials. Thus addition of small closely spaced and uniformly distributed fabric which makes inner bond with PoP can act as crack arrester and can improve its strength, sustainability & safety values.

    Acknowledgements

    The authors sincerely thank Principal, LD College of Engineering, and Ahmadabad, India for providing permission to publish the paper. Also thanks are due to Prof. (Dr.) HS Patel, Professor of Applied Mechanics Department, LD College of Engineering for providing technical assistance regarding the testing procedures, method and calculations.

    Conflict of interest

    Authors have no conflict of interest in composing this manuscript.

    References

    Creative Commons Attribution License

    ©2017 Thakkar, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.