Research Article Volume 2 Issue 3
Textile Technology, Osmania University, India
Correspondence: Hayavadana J, Textile Technology, University College of Technology, Osmania University , Hyderabad, India
Received: February 11, 2017 | Published: July 20, 2017
Citation: Hayavadana J, Samatha K. Effect of copper sulphate on hydrogen peroxide bleaching with hydrolysis on p/c fabric mechanical properties. J Textile Eng Fashion Technol. 2017;2(3):387-392. DOI: 10.15406/jteft.2017.02.00060
Surface modification of polyester and Polyester/Cotton material is not a new concept to a processing man. Alkaline oxidation of P/C blends with copper sulphate, hydrogen peroxide and base hydrolysis has shown some interesting trends. The present work includes the investigation of effect of padding copper sulphate (3 levels) and bleaching with hydrogen peroxide followed by base hydrolysis (2% concentration) at 1:5 and 1:10 MLRs with treatment temperature selected at 110 and 120 degrees centigrade on fabric mechanical properties like tensile strength, bending length, crease recovery and compressibility. In general it is observed that following copper sulphate treatment the weight increases, and decreases after bleaching. Due to the action of caustic, substrate suffers from loss of weight due to removal of chains from surface by NaOH. With increase in bath ratio (w/v) and concentration of copper sulphate, an increase in weight after copper sulphate treatment is observed, followed by decrease in weight after bleaching and loss of weight following hydrolysis. The increase in weight with increase in copper sulphate concentration is mainly due to padding. The results clearly show a positive shift following alkaline oxidation and hydrolysis from gray level. Higher bath ratios with higher hydrolysis temperature have registered a positive shift by about 30%.Decrease in bending length following bleaching and base hydrolysis has indicated the softness of the substrate. At higher bath ratio and hydrolysis temperature, as copper sulphate concentration increases, nearly 20% positive shift is observed in stiffness values. Due to alkaline oxidation and base hydrolysis with higher copper sulphate concentration at higher bath ratio and temperature, nearly 20% negative shift increase recovery values have proved that fabric has become softer following finishing. An excellent compression behavior is observed in bleached, hydrolysed samples. With increase in copper sulphate concentration the compressibility has registered an increasing trend with hydrolysed samples.
The popularity of P/C blends at various levels in different fields is the main reason behind the surface modification of P/C blends. In the present day P/C blends are mainly used for dress materials. To modify the surface, oxidation deweighting process experiments were carried out on P/C blended fabric. The cotton fiber is accessible to damage and easy to degrade in certain conditions after being oxidized. The metal ions in the fabric may accelerate the decomposition of hydrogen peroxide and damage the cotton fiber. Among metal ions, copper ranks first in catalyzing such decomposition. On the other hand research studies have confirmed that iron ions may form brown rusty spots on the fabric. If the padded fabric is oxidized by hydrogen peroxide before finishing, the copper ions would drift away from the fabric to the hydrogen peroxide solution, causing effective decomposition of hydrogen peroxide which does not contact the fabric. In oxidation deweighting, the hydrogen peroxide should decompose on the fabric as much as possible and oxidize the cotton fiber. Therefore the fabric is padded with copper sulphate and dried before oxidizing.
Gao Ming & Dong Ying2 has studied alkaline oxidation of P/C blended poplin fabric. In their study the relation between deweighting ratio with copper sulphate and hydrogen peroxide is reported. Process parameters like bath ratio, treatment times and concentration of NaOH on deweighting ratio are also reported. Although a considerable work has been reported on the effect of alkaline oxidation on deweighting ratio of P/C blends, work on the effect of alkaline oxidation followed by base hydrolysis on fabric mechanical properties like tensile strength, bending length etc. is scanty in literature. Hence the thrust of the present investigation is to investigate the effect of alkaline oxidation followed by base hydrolysis for a suiting fabric on mechanical properties.
Materials
The geometrical parameters of 67/33 P/C suiting fabric are as follows Ends/inch=68, picks/inch=58, count of warp and weft=2/40s T/C×2/40s T/C. The fabric was woven on ruti-c loom with 59.5” reed space. The chemicals used were of laboratory grade and were not purified further.
Methods
Copper, sulphate padding with 10%, 20% and 30% was carried out in sealed beakers at room temperature using laboratory model HTHP beaker dyeing machine and dried in oven Zeronian.1 The pad-dried fabric samples were then bleached using hydrogen peroxide (30% volume) at 60-80 degrees temperature. The procedure followed was recommended by Gao Ming & Dong Ying.2 The bleached samples were then base hydrolysed using 2% NaOH with 1:5 and 1:10 bath ratios (w/v) at 110 and 120 degrees for 30 minutes. The purpose of using low liquor ration is on the concept of low liquor dyeing using HTHP machine. Table 1 shows the coding of fabric samples with roman II for bleached samples and roman I for hydrolysed samples, indicated throughout the experiment. The samples were washed with tap water to remove excess alkali, followed by neutralization with 0.5% acetic acid and finally washed in deionised water and dried in oven.
Code |
Copper Sulphate Concentration |
NaOH Concentration |
Liquor Ratio |
Temperature (for Hydrolysis) |
10 C1 |
10% |
2% |
1:05 |
110 Degrees |
20 C1 |
20% |
2% |
1:05 |
110 Degrees |
30C1 |
30% |
2% |
1:05 |
110 Degrees |
10C2 |
10% |
2% |
1:05 |
120 Degrees |
20C2 |
20% |
2% |
1:05 |
120 Degrees |
30C2 |
30% |
2% |
1:05 |
120 Degrees |
10C3 |
10% |
2% |
1:10 |
110 Degrees |
20C3 |
20% |
2% |
1:10 |
110 Degrees |
30C3 |
30% |
2% |
1:10 |
110 Degrees |
10C4 |
10% |
2% |
1:10 |
120 Degrees |
20C4 |
20% |
2% |
1:10 |
120 Degrees |
30C4 |
30% |
2% |
1:10 |
120 Degrees |
Table 1 Sample coding
Conditioning and testing
The finished samples were conditioned at standard atmospheric conditions RH 65+-2% and temperature 27+-2 degrees as per IS 6359-1971.
Determination of geometrical properties
Measurement of yarn linear density: Yarn count was determined as per IS1315 and an average of 10 measurements is reported.
Measurement of yarn crimp
The crimp of yarns unravelled from the test fabric was measured on Shirley crimp as per IS: 3442-1966. Measurements were taken in both warp and weft ways. The average was given in percentage using following formula.
(1)
Where L1=length of yarn in the fabric, L2= stretched length of the yarn.
Determination of fabric GSM
GSM of the fabric samples was measured as per IS: 1964-1970.Fabric GSM was determined and the value reported is an average of measurements.
Determination of fabric thickness (Compressibility)
Fabric thickness was measured using Shirley thickness gauge as per the standard test method IS: 7702-1975. The result shown is an average of at least 10 random measurements. EMC of control and treated fabric samples are was determined using in Table 2:
(2)
To =Thickness at 0.5 gf / cm2 Tm =Thickness at maximum load
Sample |
50 g |
100g |
150g |
200g |
250g |
300g |
Control |
4 |
6 |
8 |
11 |
12 |
14 |
10C1 II |
4.3 |
6.8 |
10.34 |
11.2 |
12.06 |
12.93 |
20C1 II |
3.27 |
4.9 |
8.19 |
9.8 |
10.65 |
11.47 |
30C1 II |
1.6 |
5.6 |
6.45 |
8.8 |
9.6 |
11.29 |
10C2 II |
3.38 |
5.08 |
9.32 |
10.16 |
11.86 |
12.71 |
20C2 II |
1.66 |
4.16 |
5.83 |
7.5 |
10.83 |
12.5 |
30C2 II |
1.61 |
4.83 |
7.25 |
8.87 |
11.29 |
12.9 |
10C3 II |
3.33 |
5.83 |
7.5 |
9.16 |
10.83 |
12.5 |
20C3 II |
2.27 |
4.54 |
6.63 |
8.18 |
9.09 |
10.9 |
30C3 II |
3.5 |
5.26 |
7.01 |
8.77 |
10.52 |
11.4 |
10C4 II |
4.16 |
5.8 |
8.3 |
10.83 |
15 |
16.66 |
20C4 II |
1.78 |
4.46 |
8.92 |
10.71 |
12.5 |
14.28 |
30C4 II |
3.33 |
5 |
6.66 |
8.33 |
9.16 |
12.5 |
Hydrolysed Samples |
3 |
4 |
7 |
9 |
12 |
13 |
10C1 I |
2.04 |
5.01 |
7.14 |
9.18 |
11.22 |
12.24 |
20C1 I |
1.74 |
4.31 |
6.03 |
7.75 |
9.48 |
12.06 |
30C1 I |
2.67 |
4.46 |
7.14 |
8.9 |
11.6 |
13.39 |
10C2 I |
1.78 |
7.14 |
9.82 |
8.95 |
14.28 |
16.07 |
20C2 I |
1.75 |
3.5 |
6.14 |
7.89 |
10.52 |
12.28 |
30C2 I |
2.7 |
4.6 |
6.48 |
9.25 |
11.11 |
12.96 |
10C3 I |
1.78 |
4.46 |
6.25 |
8.03 |
9.82 |
11.6 |
20C3 I |
1.85 |
3.7 |
6.48 |
8.33 |
11.11 |
12.03 |
30C3 I |
1.92 |
3.8 |
6.7 |
8.6 |
11.53 |
13.46 |
10C4 I |
1.96 |
3.9 |
5.8 |
7.8 |
9.8 |
10.78 |
20C4 I |
2.8 |
5.6 |
7.5 |
9.43 |
10.37 |
11.32 |
Table 2 Effect on Compressibility
Determination of fabric set
Fabric set of the samples was determined as per IS: 1963-1969. This parameter defined the average distance between two consecutive threads in a fabric. Ends per inch and picks per inch are measured using Densimeter. The average of 10 observations selected randomly is reported as the final value which is later converted to threads per inch and was expressed in inches.
Testing of mechanical properties
Measurement of fabric tensile strength: Tensile strength of control and finished samples were measured as per IS1969-1968 using universal testing machine. Table 3 shows the tensile strength of control, bleached and hydrolysed samples.
Sample |
Warp Way |
Weft Way |
||
Strength |
% Shift |
Strength |
% Shift |
|
Control |
45.75 |
- |
44 |
- |
10C1 II |
44 |
3.8 |
42 |
0.54 |
20C1 II |
43 |
6.01 |
41 |
6.81 |
30C1 II |
40 |
12.56 |
39 |
11.36 |
10C2 II |
43 |
6.01 |
42 |
4.54 |
20C2 II |
37 |
19.12 |
37.2 |
15.45 |
30C2 II |
44 |
3.8 |
43 |
2.27 |
10C3 II |
43 |
6.01 |
40 |
9.09 |
20C3 II |
42 |
8.19 |
41 |
6.81 |
30C3 II |
38 |
16.93 |
37 |
15.9 |
10C4 II |
41 |
10.38 |
38 |
13.63 |
20C4 II |
38 |
16.93 |
36 |
18.18 |
30C4 II |
40 |
12.56 |
37 |
|
Hydrolysed Samples |
||||
10C1 I |
41 |
10.38 |
40 |
9.09 |
20C1 I |
40 |
12.56 |
37 |
15.09 |
30C1 I |
36.4 |
20.43 |
40 |
9.09 |
10C2 I |
- |
- |
- |
- |
20C2 I |
- |
- |
- |
- |
30C2 I |
36 |
21.31 |
29.6 |
29.52 |
10C3 I |
35.4 |
22.62 |
35 |
16.66 |
20C3 I |
38 |
16.93 |
40 |
4.76 |
30C3 I |
- |
- |
- |
- |
10C4 I |
38 |
16.93 |
36 |
14.28 |
20C4 I |
36 |
21.31 |
34 |
19.04 |
Table 3 Effect on Tensile Strength
Measurement of bending length: Shirley stiffness tester working on cantilever principle was used and the average of 10 replications is reported in Table 4 for control, beached and hydrolysed samples warp and weft way. The procedure followed is as per IS6490-1971.
Sample |
Warp Way |
Weft Way |
||
Bending Length (cm) |
% Shift |
Bending Length (cm) |
% Shift |
|
Control |
1.7 |
- |
1.6 |
- |
10C1 II |
1.51 |
11.17 |
1.38 |
13.75 |
20C1 II |
1.61 |
5.29 |
1.55 |
3.12 |
30C1 II |
1.66 |
2.35 |
1.36 |
15 |
10C2 II |
1.5 |
11.76 |
1.53 |
4.37 |
20C2 II |
1.51 |
11.17 |
1.36 |
15 |
30C2 II |
1.61 |
5.29 |
1.36 |
15 |
10C3 II |
1.55 |
8.82 |
1.46 |
8.75 |
20C3 II |
1.5 |
11.76 |
1.36 |
15 |
30C3 II |
1.51 |
11.17 |
1.41 |
11.87 |
10C4 II |
1.61 |
5.29 |
1.48 |
7.5 |
20C4 II |
1.43 |
15.88 |
1.36 |
15 |
30C4 II |
1.52 |
10.58 |
1.45 |
9.3 |
Hydrolysed Samples |
||||
10C1 II |
1.3 |
23.52 |
1.26 |
21.25 |
20C1 II |
1.45 |
14.7 |
1.46 |
8.75 |
30C1 II |
1.5 |
11.76 |
1.36 |
15 |
10C2 II |
1.35 |
20.58 |
1.28 |
20 |
20C2 II |
1.38 |
18.82 |
1.3 |
18.75 |
30C2 II |
1.41 |
17.05 |
1.35 |
15.62 |
10C3 II |
1.35 |
20.58 |
1.28 |
20 |
20C3 II |
1.43 |
15.88 |
1.34 |
16.25 |
30C3 II |
1.46 |
14.11 |
1.36 |
15 |
10C4 II |
1.41 |
17.05 |
1.35 |
15.62 |
20C4 II |
1.41 |
17.05 |
1.3 |
18.75 |
Table 4 Effect on bending length
Measurement of crease recovery: Shirley crease recovery tester was used to measure crease recovery angle of control bleached and finished angles as per IS4681-1968. The results reported as the average of 5 observations are shown in Table 5.
Sample |
Warp Way |
Weft Way |
||
Crease Recovery (Angle) |
% Shift |
Crease Recovery (Angle) |
% Shift |
|
Control |
99.5 |
- |
115 |
- |
10C1 II |
109.5 |
10.05 |
126.5 |
12 |
20C1 II |
110 |
10.5 |
127 |
12.88 |
30C1 II |
113.5 |
14.07 |
128.5 |
13.77 |
10C2 II |
115.25 |
15.82 |
129.5 |
15.11 |
20C2 II |
117.5 |
18.09 |
131.75 |
17.11 |
30C2 II |
114.5 |
15.07 |
125 |
11.11 |
10C3 II |
112.5 |
13.06 |
124 |
10.22 |
20C3 II |
112 |
12.56 |
119.5 |
6.2 |
30C3 II |
111 |
11.55 |
122 |
8.4 |
10C4 II |
111.5 |
12.06 |
123 |
9.3 |
20C4 II |
119 |
19.59 |
126 |
12 |
30C4 II |
108 |
8.54 |
119 |
5.7 |
Hydrolysed Samples |
||||
10C1 II |
111.5 |
12.06 |
128 |
13.77 |
20C1 II |
113 |
13.56 |
129.5 |
15.11 |
30C1 II |
118 |
18.59 |
132 |
17.33 |
10C2 II |
116 |
16.58 |
129 |
14.66 |
20C2 II |
119.5 |
20.1 |
131.5 |
16.88 |
30C2 II |
122.5 |
23.11 |
133.5 |
18.66 |
10C3 II |
120.5 |
21.1 |
131.5 |
16.88 |
20C3 II |
124 |
24.62 |
134 |
19.11 |
30C3 II |
125 |
25.62 |
135.5 |
20 |
10C4 II |
121 |
21.6 |
132 |
17.33 |
20C4 II |
120 |
20.6 |
131 |
16.44 |
Table 5 Effect on Crease Recovery
Effect on weight following each chemical treatment
Table 6a shows the increase in weight after copper sulphate treatment and decrease in weight after bleaching and hydrolysis. It is clear that with the increase in copper sulphate concentration the increase in weight is due to padding. On the other hand the increase in weight loss after bleaching, as the copper sulphate concentration is increased, may be due to the removal impurities and the action of hydrogen peroxide on cotton. Similarly the weight loss after hydrolysis is due to the action of caustic on polyester. A height weight loss of 9% is observed with 30% copper sulphate concentration at 120 degrees temperature. Table 6b high lights the % shift in the weight following each chemical treatment at 1:5 and 1:10 bath ratios. The % shift (positive and negative) in weight increases with increase in copper sulphate concentration. Trend is similar for bleached and hydrolysed samples. This may be due to the facts as explained above. The results are in concomitant with several researcher investigations.
Sample |
% Increase in Weight After Copper Sulphate Treatment |
% Decrease in Weight After Bleaching |
% Decrease in Weight After Hydrolysis |
10C1 I |
5.4 |
5.4 |
6.2 |
10C1 II |
5.09 |
5.13 |
- |
20C1 I |
8.4 |
6.34 |
6.3 |
20C1 II |
6.2 |
5.01 |
- |
30C1 I |
8.6 |
6.66 |
5.52 |
30C1 II |
9.07 |
7.02 |
- |
10C2 I |
4.8 |
4.9 |
7.5 |
10C2 II |
4.6 |
3.9 |
- |
20C2 I |
5.7 |
4.8 |
7.1 |
20C2 II |
5.6 |
4.3 |
- |
30C2 I |
5.8 |
3.8 |
8.4 |
30C2 II |
5.4 |
3.66 |
- |
10C3 I |
6.2 |
6.2 |
5.64 |
10C3 II |
4.08 |
4.3 |
- |
20C3 I |
9.7 |
8.3 |
5.22 |
20C3 II |
9.7 |
8.7 |
- |
30C3 I |
11.07 |
9.1 |
6.57 |
30C3 II |
12.97 |
10.95 |
- |
10C4 I |
15.3 |
13.28 |
9.05 |
10C4 II |
7.1 |
5.8 |
- |
20C4 I |
12.8 |
7.6 |
9.93 |
20C4 II |
6.7 |
6.5 |
- |
30C4 I |
14.05 |
7.8 |
9.07 |
30C4 II |
14.36 |
7.5 |
- |
Table 6a Weight loss of samples after each chemical treatment
Copper Sulphate Concentration |
Average Increase in Weight After Copper Sulphate Treatment |
Average Decrease in Weight After Bleaching |
Average Decrease in Weight After Hydrolysis at Temperature |
|
110 Degrees |
120 Degrees |
|||
For 1:5 Bath Ratio: |
||||
10% |
4.89 |
4.83 |
6.2 |
7.5 |
20% |
6.47 |
5.11 |
5.52 |
8.4 |
30% |
7.21 |
5.28 |
5.52 |
8.4 |
For 1:10 Bath Ratio: |
||||
10% |
8.17 |
7.39 |
6.3 |
7.1 |
20% |
9.725 |
7.75 |
5.22 |
9.93 |
30% |
13.112 |
8.83 |
6.57 |
9.07 |
Table 6b Effect of Chemical treatment
Effect on tensile strength
From the literature scan, it is observed that following base hydrolysis the fabric loses 5-10% fabric strength. (Table 7a) (Table 7b) addresses the positive shift for bleached and hydrolysed samples at 1:5 and 1:10 bath ratios with 3 levels of copper sulphate concentration. It is clear from the table that % shift increases in all cases with increase in copper sulphate concentration. This is due to loss in tensile strength following bleaching and hydrolysis. Reduction in tensile strength of bleached and hydrolysed samples may be due to gradual removal of molecular chains from the structure. The results are in agreement with findings by Zeronian & Collin 1.
Copper Sulphate Concentration |
Warp Way Shift |
Weft Way Shift |
For 1:5 Bath Ratio: |
||
10% |
4.905 |
4.54 |
20% |
12.56 |
11.17 |
30% |
8.17 |
6.81 |
For 1:10 Bath Ratio: |
||
10% |
8.195 |
11.36 |
20% |
12.56 |
12.49 |
30% |
14.74 |
15.9 |
Table 7a Average % Shift for tensile strength of bleached samples
Copper Sulphate Concentration |
Warp Way Shift |
Weft Way Shift |
||
110 Degrees |
120 Degrees |
110 Degrees |
120 Degrees |
|
For 1:5 Bath Ratio: |
||||
10% |
10.38 |
- |
9.09 |
- |
20% |
12.56 |
- |
15.9 |
- |
30% |
20.43 |
21.31 |
9.09 |
29.52 |
For 1:10 Bath Ratio: |
||||
10% |
22.62 |
16.93 |
16.66 |
14.28 |
20% |
16.93 |
21.31 |
15.9 |
19.04 |
30% |
- |
21.31 |
- |
30 |
Table 7b Average % shift for tensile strength of hydrolysed samples-Effect of Temperature
Effect on warp and weft way bending length
The positive % shift in bending length values of warp weft at 1:5 and 1:10 bath ratios with increase in copper sulphate concentration for bleached and hydrolysed (110 and 120 degrees temperature) samples is reported in (Table 8a) (Table 8b). A general trend observed is that % shift reduces with increase in copper sulphate concentration for warp but follows an irregular pattern for weft. The shift in bending length may be due to loss of weight following base hydrolysis. The fall in bending length values has clearly shown that fabric has imparted soft feeling.
Copper Sulphate Concentration |
Warp Way Shift |
Weft Way Shift |
For 1:5 Bath Ratio: |
||
10% |
11.465 |
9.06 |
20% |
8.23 |
9.06 |
30% |
3.82 |
15 |
For 1:10 Bath Ratio: |
||
10% |
7.05 |
8.125 |
20% |
13.82 |
15 |
30% |
10.87 |
10.58 |
Table 8a Average % Shift for bending strength of bleached samples
Copper Sulphate Concentration |
Warp Way Shift |
Weft Way Shift |
||
110 Degrees |
120 Degrees |
110 Degrees |
120 Degrees |
|
For 1:5 Bath Ratio: |
||||
10% |
23.52 |
20.58 |
21.25 |
20 |
20% |
14.7 |
18.82 |
8.75 |
18.75 |
30% |
11.76 |
17.05 |
15 |
15.62 |
For 1:10 Bath Ratio: |
||||
10% |
20.58 |
17.05 |
20 |
15.62 |
20% |
15.88 |
17.05 |
16.25 |
18.75 |
30% |
14.11 |
11.76 |
15 |
21.87 |
Table 8b Average % shift for bending length of hydrolysed samples (Temperature)
Effect on crease recovery
(Table 9a) (Table 9b) shows the average % shift (negative) increase recovery angle for bleached and hydrolysed samples in different conditions. With the increase in copper sulphate concentration and treatment temperature, the hydrolysed samples have shown larger crease recovery angles. This may be due to the fact that following weight loss, the fabric has become soft.
Copper Sulphate Concentration |
Warp Way Shift |
Weft Way Shift |
For 1:5 Bath Ratio: |
||
10% |
12.935 |
13.55 |
20% |
14.29 |
14.99 |
30% |
14.57 |
12.44 |
For 1:10 Bath Ratio: |
||
10% |
12.56 |
9.77 |
20% |
16.075 |
9.11 |
30% |
10.045 |
7.1 |
Table 9a Average % Shift for crease recovery of bleached samples
Copper Sulphate Concentration |
Warp Way Shift |
Weft Way Shift |
||
110 Degrees |
120 Degrees |
110 Degrees |
120 Degrees |
|
For 1:5 Bath Ratio: |
||||
10% |
12.06 |
16.58 |
13.77 |
14.66 |
20% |
13.56 |
20.1 |
15.11 |
16.88 |
30% |
8.59 |
23.11 |
17.33 |
18.66 |
For 1:10 Bath Ratio: |
||||
10% |
21.1 |
21.6 |
16.88 |
17.33 |
20% |
24.62 |
20.6 |
19.11 |
16.44 |
30% |
25.62 |
25.62 |
20 |
19.11 |
Table 9b Average % shift for crease recovery of hydrolysed samples (Temperature)
Effect on compressibility
Table 2 reports the EMC values for bleached and hydrolysed samples. It is observed that with increase in copper sulphate concentration, compressibility decreases for bleached samples. A reverse trend is observed in the case of hydrolysed samples.
It is clear from the above discussions that P/C blended fabrics can be imparted a soft silk like feeling following weight reduction by alkaline oxidation and base hydrolysis and the fabric will exhibit the following features.
None.
Author declares there is no conflict of interest in publishing the article.
©2017 Hayavadana, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.