Submit manuscript...
Journal of
eISSN: 2373-633X

Cancer Prevention & Current Research

Mini Review Volume 10 Issue 3

Venous thromboembolism and pancreatic cancer

K Messoudi, N Acharfi, K Oualla, S Berrad, I El Ouadki, L Amaadour, Z Benbrahim, S Arifi, N Mellas

Medical Oncology Department, Hassan II University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy of Fez, Morocco

Correspondence: K Messoudi, Medical Oncology Department, Hassan II University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy of Fez, Morocco, Tel 00212653744778

Received: June 10, 2019 | Published: June 20, 2019

Citation: Messoudi K, Acharfi N, Oualla K, et al. Venous thromboembolism and pancreatic cancer. J Cancer Prev Curr Res. 2019;10(3):69. DOI: 10.15406/jcpcr.2019.10.00394

Download PDF

Abbreviations

DVT, deep vein thrombosis; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; IVC, inferior vena cava; IVT, intra-abdominal venous thromboembolism; PTE, pulmonary thromboembolism; SMV, superior mesenteric vein; VTE, venous thromboembolism

Introduction

Pancreatic cancer (PC), one of the most lethal malignancies, is known to be frequently associated with venous thromboembolism (VTE). Studies reported that VTE incidences are different according to cancer type, and they have a common result that PC is one of the malignancies, which is most highly associated with VTE incidence.1,2 In the most commonly used predictive model for chemotherapy-associated thrombosis, PC was categorized in “very high risk” group with gastric cancer.3 Furthermore, even asymptomatic incidental VTE was also associated with mortality in PC.4 These findings suggest that prophylactic anticoagulation should be an important part of treatment for patients with PC.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed all patients with pancreatic cancer treated in the Department of Medical Oncology at the Hassan II University Hospital. A total of 120 patients were detected between January 2013 to Juin 2017. This study were adressed to analyze the prevalence of VTE and to investigate risk factors associated with the development of VTE after PC diagnosis.

Results

Among 120 pancreatic adenocarcinoma, 18 (15%) patients had a venous thromboembolic disease.

The median age of overall patients was 59.2 with range between 54 and 77. ECOG performance status was 3 and 4 in 30% cases. More than half of patients (70%) had metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma and nearly half of them (27.1%) had multiple metastatic lesions. A total of 23 (18.7%) patients underwent major abdominal surgery with the aim of curative treatment and 72 (60%) received chemotherapy with adjuvant or palliative aims. 

Venous thromboembolisms were diagnosed with imaging modalities including Doppler ultrasonography, or computed tomography (CT), depending on the anatomical sites. The asymptomatic and incidental VTE were detected during the assessment scan. 5 (27.7%) patients had pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE) and 38.8% of patients in deep vein thrombosis (DVT). The rest VTE events (33.3%) occurred in the intra-abdominal vessels—portal vein, superior mesenteric vein (SMV), inferior vena cava (IVC), splenic vein, and others.

The diagnosis of DVT was synchronous with the progression of the disease in 16.6% of cases. 7 patients had VTE and PC simultaneously in the first imaging study. Two of them had previous CT imaging, and both had VTE before PC diagnosis. The potential risk factors associated with developing the VTE are: ischemic heart disease was presented in 10% cases. Advanced cancer stage at the time of diagnosis was the strongest risk factor (incidence of VTE was higher in metastatic cancer 55.5% compared a resectable PC 11.1%). Treatment was started on the same day of diagnosis and was based on low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs)+ /-  vitamin K antagonist. Relay to antivitamin K was established in 33% of cases. Thromboembolic disease was controlled in 16% of cases; 70% have been lost.

Conclusion

Cancer is a major risk factor for thromboembolic disease, especially for patients with poor general health and advanced cancer. Advanced metastatic stage was the strongest predictor of VTE. Scores carrying predictive value will support the indication of prophylactic anticoagulation for patients at low bleeding risk and high risk for venous thromboembolism. Recent and ongoing clinical trials have focused on VTE prophylaxis with low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) in high-risk cancer outpatients, particularly those with pancreatic cancer

Competing interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

Creative Commons Attribution License

©2019 Messoudi, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.