Submit manuscript...
Journal of
eISSN: 2469 - 2786

Bacteriology & Mycology: Open Access

Research Article Volume 7 Issue 3

Investigation of antimicrobial resistance in urinary tract infection in children at the east party of democratic Republic of Congo

Mashako R Many,1 Mashako K Yves,2 Nsibu N Celestin,3 Bitwe M Richard4

1Pediatric Department, North-Kivu Provincial Hospital, Republic of Congo
2Pediatric Department, North-Kivu Provincial Hospital, Republic of Congo
3Pediatric Department, Kinshasa University, Republic of Congo
4Pediatric Department, Kinshasa University, Republic of Congo

Correspondence: Mashako R Many, Pediatric Department, North-Kivu Provincial Hospital, Republic of Congo

Received: May 04, 2019 | Published: May 21, 2019

Citation: Many MR, Yves Mk, Celestin NN, et al. Investigation of antimicrobial resistance in urinary tract infection in children at the east party of democratic Republic of Congo. J Bacteriol Mycol Open Access. 2019;7(3):50-53. DOI: 10.15406/jbmoa.2019.07.00242

Download PDF

Abstract

Urinary tract infection (UTI) is one of the most common pediatric pathology in childhood. Knowledge of local antimicrobial resistance is essential to guide empiric anti biotherapy ant biotherapy in treatment of UTI in children.

Aim: To determine anti bio resistance profile in the children urinary tract infection in our area study.

Methods: This is a retrospective study designed and conducted from January 1St to December 31, 2018 at North-Kivu Provincial Hospital. All children with urines cultures positives result were included in this study. Isolated bacteria and antimicrobial susceptibility tested were by using biochemical methods.

Results: Proteus Mirabilis were the main gram negative bacteria isolated in 41.2% and Enterobacteria spp 17.6% the most gram positive bacteria identified. All bacteria are resistant to ampicillin.

Conclusion: Antibiotic resistance in children urinary tract infection, must be regularly studied in order to choose rationally the best empiric antibiotic used.

Keywords: urinary infection, empiric antibiotic, antimicrobial resistance, children

Introduction

Urinary tract infection is one of the common diseases in childhood with worldwide with worldwide prevalence of 2-20%.1,2 This pathology represents an important source of using empiric or irrational antibiotic initially because of absence of specific symptom, signs and microbiological confirmation in most of cases.3–5 Urinary tract infection area important public health problem in children, if treatment is inadequate, this affection exposure children to high morbid-mortality, renal scarring, renal abscess formation, hypertension, septicemia, pyelonephritis and chronic renal failure,6,7 antimicrobial resistance8,9 and other complications.10 In developed countries initial choice of antimicrobial therapy is based on knowledge of the predominant pathogen in the patient’s age group, antibiotic sensitivity patterns in the practice area, clinical status of patient and the opportunity for close follow-up4,10 compared to several Sub-Saharan African countries, in which urinary tract infection are treated without microbiological result and studies beforehand because of people poverty. In Democratic Republic of Congo, few studies report on children urinary tract infection11 and in North-Kivu Province this children pathology is usually treated empirically because of lack standard therapeutic guideline and local susceptibility data. This’s how, in this study aims to report bacteria and antimicrobial resistance profile of children urinary tract infection in our area study.

Materials and methods

Type and study period

The present study is retrospective, non-randomised and convenient sampling. This study was conducted from January 1st, to December 31, 2018 and reviewed children aged from 0-15years with urine culture result.

Area study

The study was conducted at pediatric department of North-Kivu Provincial Hospital, which is the health reference center of North-Kivu Province. It has 205beds capacity for all Hospital. Pediatric department use one professor, four pediatrics specialists, five doctors and an important nursing staff. North-Kivu Provincial Hospital has an excellent microbiological laboratory of this party of Democratic Republic of Congo.

Population study

All children with urinary tract infection symptoms or signs such as in explained fever recurrent abdominal pain, malodorous urine, urinary frequency, cloudy urine, nocturnal enuresis,12,13,15 suboptimal weight gain, prolonged jaundice, irritability and vomiting in neonates14,16 constitute our population study.

Inclusion criteria

All children with urines cultures positives and susceptibility result were included in this study.

Exclusion criteria

We excluded in this study, children with negative urine culture and without susceptibility result. Also, catheterized children were excluded.

Urinary samples

Urinary samples were collected in sterile containers following standard biochemical test.11,4 Each specimen was freshly reviewed under microscopy, colored with gram, sowed on Cysteine Lactose Electrolytic Deficient, Incubated 24 hours, purity gram stain, identification bacterial and analysed susceptibility drugs. Isolated bacteria were tested by using the disk diffusion method on Muller Hinton Agar. Result were interpreted according European Standard.17 Following antibiotics were tested: Ampicillin(AMP), Amoxicillin(AMC), Gentamycin(GN), Nitrofurantoin(NIT), Ciprofloxacin(CIP), Ceftriaxone(CRO), Cloxacillin(CL), Oxacillin(OX) and Cefepime(CEP).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed by using the SPSS statistical package version 20.0, Microsoft Windows and Excel 2016. Differences in group proportions and categorical variables were assessed by using Chi-square test. A p-value<0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

Ethical approval

Approval was obtained by North-Kivu Provincial Hospital authority and anonymity sample was analysed in order to ensure confidentiality in this study.

Results

Table 1Table 4.

Characteristic

N=39

100%

Age

 

 

2month-2years

06

17.6

3-5yeras

13

38.2

>5year

15

44.1

Gender

 

 

Male

13

38.2

Female

21

61.8

Table 1 Characteristic of children
44.1% of children were over 5years old. Female was 61.8% with significant difference p<0.05. Sex ratio was 0.61.

Bacteria isolates

N= 39

100%

Gram negative

Proteus mirabilis

14

41.2

Pseudomonas aeroginosa

08

23.5

E. coli

05

12.8

Citrobacter

03

8.8

Yersinia enterocolitica

01

2.9

Gram positive

Enterobacter spp

06

17.6

Enterocoques fecalis

01

2.9

Staphylococcus spp

01

2.9

Table 2 Bacteria isolates in urinary tract infection in children
Mean gram negative bacteria were isolated in urinary tract infection especially: proteus mirabilis 41.2%, pseudomonas aeroginosa 23.5 %, E. coli 12.8%.

Ac

 

G- Bacteria

 

 

 

G+ Bacteria

Other

Proteus n=14

Pseudomonas n=8

E.coli n=5

Citobacter n=3

Yersinia n=1

Enterobacteria n=6

Bacteria n=2

AMP

14(100)

4(50)

5(100)

3(100)

1(100)

6(100)

2(100)

AMC

1(7.1)

2(25)

1(20)

0(0.0)

0(0.0)

0(0.0)

0(0.0)

GN

3(21.4)

2(25)

1(20)

3(100)

1(100)

2(33.3)

0(0.0)

NIT

3(21.3)

0(0.0)

0(0.0)

0(0.0)

1(100)

3(50)

0(0.0)

CIP

2(14.3)

0(0.0)

0(0.0)

1(33.3)

1(100)

0(0.0)

0(0.0)

CRO

1(7.1)

0(0.0)

0(0.0)

0(0.0)

0(0.0)

1(16.7)

0(0.0)

CL

0(0.0)

0(0.0)

0(0.0)

0(0.0)

0(0.0)

0(0.0)

2(100)

OX

0(0.0)

0(0.0)

0(0.0)

0(0.0)

0(0.0)

0(0.0)

2(100)

CEP

1(7.1)

0(0.0)

1(20)

0(0.0)

0(0.0)

0(0.0)

2(100)

Table 3 Antibiotic resistance tested (ART)
Resistance to Ampicillin was also 100%.

Drugs resistance

Proteus

Pseudomonas

E. coli

Citrobacter

Yersinia

n=14(100)

n=8(100)

n=5(100)

n=3(100)

n=1(100)

AMP

14(100)

4(50)

5(100)

5(100)

1(100)

AMP, AMC

1(7.14)

2(25)

1(20)

1(33.3)

0(0.0)

AMP, AMC, GN

1(7.14)

2(25)

1(20)

1(33.3)

0(0.0)

AMP, AMC, GN, NIT, CIP, CRO, CEP

2(14.3)

0(0.0)

0(0.0)

0(0.0)

0(0.0)

Table 4 Multidrug resistance pattern Gram negative bacteria
This table show that multidrug pattern Gram negative bacteria.

Discussion

A total of 97 urines samples were reviewed in this study. 39urines cultures were positives. 44.1% of children were over 5years old. Several authors reported similar results.4 This study revealed a higher incidence of urinary tract infection in female sex 61.8% than male with sex ratio of 0.61. Our result, in this regard was compared to that reported in Nigeria18 and Ethiopia.19 This higher prevalence of urinary tract infection could be explained by short urethra anatomy in female, proximity of reproductive and urinary organs with anus and inadequate perineal hygiene. The first attack occurring in girls by 5years, peaking during infancy life. While it’s common in boys during the first year of life especially among those who are uncircumcised.20,21 In girl, education ongoing perineal hygiene must began at this age. In our series, mean gram negative bacteria were isolated in urinary tract infection especially: protease mirabilis 41.2%, pseudomonas aeruginosa 23.5 %, E. coli 12.8 % and the common gram positive bacteria were Enterobacteria saprophytic 17.6%. Similar result was found by other authors in different proportion.8,11 In urinary tract infection, common causative organisms are from to the intestinal flora in children age.22‒24 Proteus mirabilis, is more common in boys than in girl’s urinary tract infection.25 This is not confirmed in our study and we did not find a serious explanation for this difference in all the revised literature. However, in boys per urethral colonization is an important favouring factor of urinary tract infection in this case. Also, preputial space is potential reservoir of bacterial pathogens for uncircumcised boys. Higher antibiotic resistance rate were noted against frequently with ampicillin (100%) in most cases, amoxicillin and gentamycin, which are more antibiotic used in the first empirical choice in our countries. This problem could rend Overall; prevalence of antimicrobial drug resistance was lower than recently reported study in neigh boring countries. For example, in Rwanda, recently author reported higher resistance rate for ampicillin, amoxicillin, norfloxacin and ciprofloxacin, higher to resistance rates reported in South-Kivu neighbouring province11 compared to our study.26,27

Multidrug-resistance to antibiotic in Gram-negative bacteria, especially with Enterobacteriaceae has become a serious problem in many regions of the world and require treatment with reserve drugs,28‒31 and some new drug which are inaccessible financially to the common people especially in Sub-Saharan African countries. Beta lactams resistance (Table 4) is a good proof marker for these situations. In our context, people have poor living condition, poverty which contributor low level education and barriers to health services. All these factors promote self-medication with antibiotic in particular beta lactams. This practice selects multi resistant organism and explains withdrawal of ampicillin oral form on the Congolese market by government our study has limitation because it was performed in a tertiary referral hospital for North-Kivu province. Patient who arrive at North-Kivu Provincial Hospital have several comorbidities initially treated with empiric antibiotic at secondary medical structure. This would influence the prevalence of antimicrobial resistance observed in our area study.32,33

Conclusion

Antimicrobial resistance rate change over time highlighting, the need for continued monitoring of the susceptibility patterns of urinary tract infection. This study shows a variable profile of bacteria and antimicrobial resistance that should guide the empiric choice of antibiotic locally for treatment of urinary tract infection in children.

Acknowledgements

None.

Conflict of interest

Author declares that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Shaikh N, Morone N, Bost J, et al. Pevalence of urinary tract infection in childhood a meta-analysis. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2008; 27(4):302‒308.
  2. Douning H, Thomas-James E, Gal M, et al. The diagnostic and prospective observational study to derive and validate a clinical algorithm for the diagnosis of urinary tract infaction in children presenting to primary care with an acute illness. BMC Infect Dis. 2012;2(6):158.
  3. Elder J. Urologic disorders in infants and children In: Behrman R, Kllegman R, editors. Nelson text book of pediatrics. 18th edn. Philadelphia,WB Sawders; 2010.
  4. Grunduz S, Altun H. Antibiotic resistance patterns of urinary tract pathogens in Turkish children. Global Health Research and Policy. 2018;3:10.
  5. DesaiD, Gilbert B, Bride C. Paediatric urinary tract infection, diagnosis and treatment. Aust From Physician. 2016;45(8):558‒563.
  6. Montini G, Tullus K, Hewit I. Febrile urinary tract infection in children. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(3):23(3):239‒250.
  7. Bahadur L, Boral R, Poudel P, et al. Etiological, clinical and antimicrobial susceptibility profile of pediatric urinary tract infections in a tertiary care hospital of Nepal. BMC Pediatric. 2019;19:36.
  8. Ibrahim G, Neslihan C, Sercin G, et al. Changes in bacterial resistance patterns of pediatric urinary tract infections and rationale for empirical antibiotic therapy. Balkan Med J. 2017;34:432‒435.
  9. Mirisoleymani S, Salimi M, Shareghi B, et al. Bacterial pathogens and antimicrobial resistance patterns in pediatric. Urinary tract infections a four-year surveillance study. Int J Pediatr. 2014;6‒24.
  10. Beetza R, Westenfelderb M. Antimicrobial therapy of urinary tract infections in children? Int J of Antimicrob Agents. 2011;38:42‒50.
  11. Irenge L, Kabego L, Vandulberg O, et al. Antimicrobial resistance in urinary isolates from inpatients and out patients at tertiary care Hospital in South- Kivu Province. BMC Research Notes. 2014;7:374.
  12. Simoes E, Oliviera E. Update on the approach of urinary tract infection in childhood. J Pediatr Rio J. 2015;916:S2-S10.
  13. Schlager T. Urinary tract infections and children. Microb Spectr J. 2016;4(5):22.
  14. Bell L, Matoot T. Update in childhood yrinary tract infection and vesicoureteral reflux. Semin Nephr. 2009;29(4):349‒349.
  15. Gauttier M, Gouin S, Phan V, et al. Association of maldorous urine with urinary tract infection in children aged 1 to 36months. Pediatrics. 2012;129(5):285‒290.
  16. Shaikh N, Moven S, Tej K, et al. Urinary tract infection in infants older than one month and young children. Clinical features and diagnosis. 2019.
  17. European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (ECAST). Breakpoint tables for interpretation of MICS and zone diameters. 2013.
  18. Aiyegoro O, Igbinosa O, Ogunmwonyi et al. Incidence of urinary tract infection among children and adolescents in Ile-Ife. Nigeria. Afr Journ Microb Research. 2007;13:19.
  19. Merya Y, Terfa K, Mamuye D, et al. Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of bacterial uropathogens isolated from pediatric patients at Yekati 12 hospital Medical college ; Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Inter J of Microb. 2018;8:35‒39.
  20. Ranjibar R, Haghi-Ashtiani T, Jonaidi N, et al. The prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of bacterial uropathogens isolated from pediatric patients. Iran Journal of Public Health. 2009;38(2):134–139.
  21. Ashok C, Kumar V. Study of the prevalence and clinical profile of urinary tract infection in febrile children aged 3- 6 years who attended pediatric out patients department in a tertiary care hospital. Intern Journ of Health Scienc and Res. 2013;3(2):1‒5.
  22. Morella W, La Scola C, Alberici I, et al. Acute pyelonephritis in children. Pediatr Nephr. 2016;3(8):1253‒1265.
  23. Garout W, Kurdi H, Shili A, et al. Urinary tract infection in children younger than 5 years : etiology and associated urological anomalies. Saudi Med J. 2015;67(3):546‒558.
  24. Doem C, Richardson S. Diagnosis of urinary tract infection in children. J Clin Microb. 2016;31(8):1253‒1265.
  25. Leung A, Wong A, Leung M, et al. Urinary tract infection in children. Res Patients on Inflam and All Drug Discovery. 2019;13 :1‒17.
  26. Ntirenganya C, Manj O, Mambo C, et al. High prevalence of antimicrobial resistance among common bacterial isolates in a tertiary health care facility in Rwanda. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2015;92(4):865‒870.
  27. Makeda C, Ranaihagari A, Musabeyezi E, et al. Five-year antimicrobial susceptibility trends among bacterial isolates from at Tertiary Health Care facility in Kigali, Rwanda. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2016;95(6):1277‒1283.
  28. Theuretzbacher U. Global efficace antimicrobial resistance in gram-negative pathogens and clinical need. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2017;39:106‒112.
  29. Doi Y, Bonana R, Hooper D, et al. Gram-negative Comittee of Antimicrobial resistance leadership group. Clin Inf Dis. 2017; 64(1):S30‒S35.
  30. Winfried V. Multiresistance bacterial-antibiotic prescription and antibiotic of last resort. Dtsch Med Wachensch. 2018;143(9): 643‒650.
  31. Sevindik M. Investigation of Antioxidant/Oxidant Status and Antimicrobial Activities of Lentinus tigrinus. Advances in Pharmacological Sciences. 2018.
  32. Drieux L, Brossier F, Sougakoff W, et al. Phenotypic detection of extended spectumbeta-lactamase production in enterobacteriaceae. Review and bench Guide. Clin Microb Inf. 2008;14(1):90‒103.
  33. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Twenty-fourth informational supplement. Wayne PA, USA; 2014.
Creative Commons Attribution License

©2019 Many, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.