Submit manuscript...
Journal of
eISSN: 2473-0831

Analytical & Pharmaceutical Research

Research Article Volume 8 Issue 2

Formulation development and in vitro evaluation of oral disintegrating tablets for newer anticonvulsant agent

Raghavendra Kumar Gunda,1 Prasada Rao Manchineni,2 Chaikam Gopi Reddy,1 Kurapati Divya,1 Duddu Alekhya,1 Ekula Jyoshna1

1Department of Pharmaceutics, M.A.M College of Pharmacy, India
2Department of Pharmaceutical Analysis, M.A.M College of Pharmacy, India

Correspondence: Raghavendra Kumar Gunda, Assistant Professor, Department of Pharmaceutics, M.A.M college of Pharmacy, Kesanupalli (V), Narasaraopet, Guntur(D.t), A.P. India-522601

Received: March 31, 2019 | Published: April 26, 2019

Citation: Gunda RK, Manchineni PR, Reddy CG, et al. Formulation development and in vitro evaluation of oral disintegrating tablets for newer anticonvulsant agent. J Anal Pharm Res. 2019;8(2):85?89. DOI: 10.15406/japlr.2019.08.00318

Download PDF

Abstract

Objective: The main objective of current research work is to formulate the Levetiracetam oral disintegrating tablets. Levetiracetam, a newer anti convulsant and used to treat epilepsy and chronic seizures.

Methods: The oral disintegrating tablets of Levetiracetam were prepared employing various proportions of Crospovidone and Croscarmellose sodium as a Superdisintegrants by Direct Compression technique. 9 formulations were developed and are evaluated for various finished product quality assurance methods.

Results: Results reveals that all the formulation was found to be within the Pharmacopoeial limits and the In-vitro dissolution profiles of all formulations were fitted in to different Kinetic models, the statistical parameters were determined.

Conclusion: Formulation (F5) containing 37.5mg of Crospovidone and 37.5mg of Croscarmellose, is ideal formulation (similarity factor f2= 82.676, dissimilarity factor f1=2.049 & No significant difference, t=0.0456) to marketed product (SPRITAM-250). Formulation (F5) follows First order, Higuchi’s kinetics, mechanism of drug release was found to be Non-Fickian Diffusion (n=0.666).

Keywords: levetiracetam, 32factorial design, superdisintegrants, crospovidone, croscarmellose sodium, wetting time, disintegration time, non-fickian diffusion

Abbreviations

ODT, oral disintegrating tablet; RPM, revolutions per minute; Kg, kilo gram; CP, crospovidone; CCS, croscaramellose sodium; mg, milligram; mL, milliliter; %CDR, percentage cumulative drug release; BCS, biopharmaceutical classification; UR, un released; Min, minute; ºC, degree centigrade; mm, millimeter; t1/2, half life; t10%, time taken to release 10% drug from dosage form; t50%, time taken to release 50% drug from dosage form; t75%, time taken to release 75% drug from dosage form, t90%, time taken to release 90% drug from dosage form; WT, wetting time; DT, disintegration time

Introduction

Dysphasia is a common problem of all age groups, especially geriatrics and pediatrics. Oral disintegrating tablets creates new trend in the pharmaceutical market. Fast dissolving tablets are suitable many kinds of patients. Oro dispersible tablets, rapimelts, mouth-dissolving tablets, Fast dissolving tablets, quick dissolving, melt-in mouth tablets, porous tablets were also frequently used for ODT. Many drugs candidates are suitable to formulate as ODT.1               

They quickly disintegrate/dissolve in oral cavity within <1 min.2-4 FDTs are prepared by various techniques, formed ODTs may vary in sensual characteristics such as, mouth feel, taste, swallowability, mechanical strength of tablet, drug release, bioavailability and stability. Various processes employed in formulating ODTs include Lyophilization, mass extrusion, cotton candy process, molding, spray drying, and compaction (wet granulation, dry granulation, direct compression), Durasolv® technology.5-7

Levetiracetam is an anticonvulsant agent, used to treat epilepsy. The main aim of this study is to formulate Oral Fast Disintegrating Tablets of Levetiracetam to achieve rapid dissolution, absorption. Oral disintegrating Tablets of Levetiracetam were designed with a view to enhance the patient compliance (pediatric) and provide a quick onset of action.8-14

In the current research investigation the direct compression method was utilized to formulate tablets, due numerous advantages such as simplest and cost effective tablet production method.15

Materials and methods

Levetiracetam was a gift sample procured from Aurobindo Pharma Ltd, Hyderabad, India. Mannitol, Crospovidone, Croscarmellose sodium were procured from DME Pvt Ltd, Mumbai. Other excipients were procured from LobaChemie. Ltd., Mumbai. 

Preparation of levetiracetam fast dissolving tablets

Levetiracetam Tablets were prepared by direct compression method. The formulae was presented as Table 1. All ingredients were subjected screening with the help sieve #40. All the above ingredients were subjected to uniform mixing. Lubricants were screened vis sieve #80, mix them with above powder blend. The powder blend was subjected to compression using minipress (RIMEK 8 station) using 10mm circular punches. Formed tablets were evaluated for In-process quality assurance tests. Tablets were packaged in well closed light resistance and moisture proof containers. 

Name of Ingredients

Quantity of Ingredients per each Tablet (mg)

F1

F2

F3

F4

F5

F6

F7

F8

F9

Levetiracetam

250

250

250

250

250

250

250

250

250

Mannitol

42

54.5

67

54.5

67

79.5

67

79.5

92

Crospovidone

50

50

50

37.5

37.5

37.5

25

25

25

Croscarmellose sodium

50

37.5

25

50

37.5

25

50

37.5

25

Magnesium Stearate

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

Talc

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

Total Weight

400

400

400

400

400

400

400

400

400

Table 1 Formulae for the Preparation of Levetiracetam Fast Dissolving Tablets

Evaluation of levetiracetam fast dissolving tablets

Hardness: The hardness test was performed using Monsanto Tablet Hardness Tester.16 

Friability: The friability of the tablets was determined with the help of Roche Friabilator. Weight of 20 Tablets noted as Initial weight (W0 ) are dedusted in a drum for 4 min with a rotation rate of 25rpm and weight was noted as Final weight (W). Percentage friability was determined from following equation. The weight loss should not be more than 1%.16 

Friability ( % )  = (W 0 -W) /W 0 x 100 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqk0=Mr0xXdbba91rFfpec8Eeeu0xXdbba9frFj0=OqFf ea0dXdd9vqaq=JfrVkFHe9pgea0dXdar=Jb9hs0dXdbPYxe9vr0=vr 0=vqpWqaaeaabaGaciaacaqabeaadaqaaqaaaOqaaKqzGeaeaaaaaa aaa8qacaqGgbGaaeOCaiaabMgacaqGHbGaaeOyaiaabMgacaqGSbGa aeyAaiaabshacaqG5bGaaeiiaOWdamaabmaabaqcLbsapeGaaeyjaa GcpaGaayjkaiaawMcaaKqzGeWdbiaabccacaqG9aGaaeiia8aacaqG OaWdbiaabEfak8aadaWgaaWcbaqcLbmapeGaaeimaaWcpaqabaqcLb sapeGaaeylaiaabEfapaGaaeyka8qacaqGGaGaae4laiaabEfak8aa daWgaaWcbaqcLbmapeGaaeimaaWcpaqabaqcLbsapeGaaeiEaiaabc cacaqGXaGaaeimaiaabcdaaaa@5712@

Content uniformity: 20 tablets were randomly selected and the percent drug content was determined, the tablets contained not less than 92.5% or not more than 107.5% (100±7.5%) of the labeled drug content can be considered as the test was passed.17 

Assay: Select fixed number of sample on the random basis (20), comminute them to a obtain powder. The powder equivalent to 100mg Levetiracetam was weighed and dissolved in 10ml of Distilled water in volumetric flask, the volume was adjusted to 100ml with Phosphate buffer pH 6.8 and the solution was filtered. An aliquot of 1.0ml of solution were diluted to 10ml Phosphate buffer pH 6.8 in separate volumetric flask. The drug content in was determined spectrophotometrically at 215nm.15 

Thickness: Thickness was determined with the help vernier calipers.18 

Wetting time: To measure Wetting time of the Tablet, a piece of Tissue paper folded twice was placed in a small petri dish (Internal Diameter is=6.5cm) containing 5ml of Distilled water. A Tablet placed on the paper, and the time for complete wetting of the tablet was measured in sec.19,20 

In-vitro dissolution study: Levetiracetam oral disintegrating tablets subjected to dissolution test with the help of USP XXIII type-II tablet dissolution test apparatus using 900ml of Phosphate buffer pH 6.8 operated under standard set of conditions. Withdraw samples at fixed intervals with the aid of syringe with a pre-filter, and maintain the sink condition. Absorbance’s for samples were noted at 215nm using UV Visible spectrophotometer (after suitable dilutions if necessary). The determinations were performed in triplicate (n=3).15 

Disintegration test: Disintegration of oral disintegrating tablets is achieved in the oral cavity owing to the impact of saliva, salivary volume is limited hence there is no proper In vitro In vivo correlation (IVIVC) was found in USP and IP. A modified method was used to determine to perform the disintegration test. A cylindrical vessel with 10 # was placed in such way that only 2ml of medium would be placed below the sieve. 6ml of medium was placed inside the vessel in such way that 4ml of the media was below the sieve and 2ml above the sieve. Tablet was placed on the sieve and the whole assembly was then placed on the top of agitator. Disintegration time was recorded. Six tablets were chosen randomly from the composite samples and the average value was determined.18

Kinetic modeling of drug release: The dissolution profile of all the formulations was subjected to kinetic modeling.21–25

Results and discussion

9 Levetiracetam Oral Disintegrating Tablet formulations were prepared by direct compression method using various proportions of super disintegrants combination as per the formulae presented in Table 1. All the formulations containing 250mg of Levetiracetam prepared tablets prepared and evaluated for various pharmacopoeial limits such as, drug content, mean hardness, friability, mean thickness, Weight variation as per official methods. The Thickness values were found in the range from 3.45±0.7mm to 3.74±0.1mm. Uniformity in the values indicates that formulations were compressed without sticking to the dies and punches. Hardness was maintained to be within 3.11±0.12Kg/cm2 to 3.55±0.1Kg/cm2. The hardness of all batches were almost uniform and possess good mechanical strength. The study results for friability were found well within the approved range (<1%) in all the formulation. Results revealed that the tablets possess good mechanical strength.

All the tablets passed weight variation test as the % weight variation was within the pharmacopoeial limits of ±5%. Average weight for all formulations was found to be in the range of 399.68±0.3-401.48±2.0mg. This is due to good flow property and compressibility of all the formulations.

From the results of wetting time and Disintegration time, it reveals that as the concentration of superdisinterants increases the wetting time decreases (Concentration of superdisintegrants inversely proportional to wetting time).Wetting time for all the formulations varied from 12.17±1.3 to 88.03±1.2 sec. The Disintegration Time of tablets was in the range of 9.12±0.5-53.21±2.4 sec.

Results for all Post-compression parameters were tabulated or shown in Table 2-4 and plots for wetting time and disintegration were presented in Figure 1 & Figure 2. The cumulative percentage drug released by each tablet in the In Vitro Release studies were based on the mean content of the drug present in the respective tablet.

S. no

Formulation Code

Hardness (kg/cm2)

Thickness
(mm)
    

Friability (%)

Average Weight (mg)

Drug
Content (%)

Wetting Time ( sec)

Disintegration Time (sec)

1

F1

3.11±0.12      

3.4±0.8

0.58±0.2

400.69±0.9

99.49±1.1

12.17±1.3

9.12±0.6

2

F2

3.20±0.15

3.45±0.7

0.64±0.3

401.46±1.9

99.28±0.7

14.09±1.3

9.32±0.6

3

F3

3.21±0.11

3.6±0.5

0.62±0.1

400.67±1.1

99.41±0.5

18.10±1.7

10.30±0.7

4

F4

3.2±0.14

3.5±0.6

0.62±0.19

400.55±2.2        

99.53±0.4           

38.23±1.5        

12.5±0.9

5

F5

3.15±0.16

3.55±0.4      

0.52±0.30      

401.48±1.1

99.39±0.6

42.38±1.2

12.81±0.9

6

F6

3.55±.10

3.7±.2

0.65±0.04

401.04±2.0

99.92±0.4

48.2±1.2

13.21±0.7

7

F7

3.3±0.15

3.55±0.6     

0.61±0.3

400.48±1.4

99.23±1.0

51.16±1.5

28.18±1.2

8

F8

3.31±0.12

3.6±0.4

0.57±0.4

399.68±0.3

99.51±0.8

78.11±1.9

42.39±0.5

9

F9

3.21±0.13

3.74±0.1

0.62±0.4

400.45±0.9

99.49±0.9

88.03±1.2

53.21±2.4

Table 2 Post-Compression Parameters

S. no

Formulation

Code

Kinetic parameters

Zero order

First order

Higuchi

Korsmeyer-peppas

a

b

r

a

b

r

a

b

r

a

b

r

1

F1

49.51

1.150

0.689

1.678

0.031

0.948

24.919

12.157

0.874

0.730

0.830

0.746

2

F2

46.954   

1.178

0.710

1.678

0.027

0.912

22.494

12.282

0.889

0.701

0.847

0.755

3

F3

44.34

1.212   

0.733

1.730   

0.026   

0.934

20.077   

12.420   

0.903      

0.671   

0.861   

0.764

4

F4

48.066

1.173

0.696

1.630

0.028

0.880      

23.282

12.334

0.879

0.705

0.847

0.749

5

F5

45.180

1.242

0.730      

1.777

0.033

0.969

20.310

12.735

0.904

0.666

0.873

0.761

6

F6

42.480

1.261

0.749

1.762

0.028

0.941

17.915

12.765

0.913

0.638

0.886

0.770

7

F7

46.381

1.178

0.710

1.682

0.025

0.914

21.993

12.266

0.888

0.694

0.849

0.753

8

F8

43.238

1.233

0.739

1.737

0.025

0.931

18.836

12.570

0.905

0.648

0.876

0.766

9

F9

42.401

1.217

0.739

1.725

0.022

0.906

18.324

12.406

0.904

0.644

0.874

0.766

10

MP

44.978

1.22

0.730

1.76

0.031

0.952

20.44

12.532

0.899

0.676

0.861

0.765

Table 3 Statistical parameters

S.NO

Formulation

code

Kinetic parameters

t10% (Min)

t50% (Min)

t75% (Min)

t90%(Min)

1

F1

1.463

9.630

19.260

32.001

2

F2

1.724

11.344

22.687

37.695

3

F3

1.784

11.739

23.479

39.010

4

F4

1.652

10.870

21.740

36.121

5

F5

1.320

8.670

17.345

28.821

6

F6

1.648

10.841

21.682

36.024

7

F7

1.832

12.051

24.101

40.044

8

F8

1.805

11.872

23.744

39.451

9

F9

2.092

13.762

27.525

45.732

10

MP

1.526

10.042

20.084

33.370

Table 4 Dissolution/ kinetic parameters

Figure 1 Wetting Time Chart for Formulation F1-F9.

Figure 2 Disintegration Time Chart for Formulation F1-F9.

Cumulative % Drug release for F1-F9 at 60min were found to be in the range of 95.35-99.25%. Dissolution profiles of Levetiractam oral disintegrating formulations was subjected to goodness of fit test by linear regression analysis according to kinetic modeling to ascertain the drug release mechanism. The statistical parameters for kinetic models were determined and data present as Table 3 and plots represented as fig.3-6. From the results it was clearly understood that data well for First order kinetics with R2 values in the range of 0.880-0.969. The values of r for formulations regarding Higuchi’s kinetics within a range of 0.874-0.913, Kinetic data also treated for Peppas equation, the slope (n) values ranges from 0.638-0.730 that shows Non-Fickian diffusion mechanism. Formulation F5 containing 37.5mg of Crospovidone, 37.5mg of Croscarmellose sodium exerted promising dissolution parameter (Wetting time=42.38±1.2sec, Disintegrating time=12.81±0.89 sec, t50%=8.670min, t90%= 28.821min) (Figure 3-6). Results for Kinetic parameters were presented in Table 4. The final best Formulation F5 is compared with Marketed product SPRITAM-250 tablets and Comparative Dissolution profiles shown in Figure 7. Which shows similarity (f2=82.676, f1=2.049).

Figure 3 Comparative Zero order plots for Formulation F1-F9.

Figure 4 Comparative First order plots for Formulation F1-F9.

Figure 5 Comparative Higuchi plots for Formulation F1-F9.

Figure 6 Comparative Korsmeyer-Peppas plots for Formulation F1-F9.

Figure 7 Comparative In-vitro Dissolution Profiles of F5, SPRITAM.

Conclusion

The current research investigation focuses about influence of utilization of superdisinterants such as Crospovidone and Croscarmellose sodium in the formulation development of oral disintegrating tablet formulations of Levetiracetam. Results reveals that quantities of Superdisintegrant shows good impact on release of drug from formulation (directly proportional) The optimized formulation followed Higuchi’s kinetics while the drug release mechanism was found to be Non-Fickian Diffusion, first order release type. On the basis of evaluation parameters, the optimized formulation F5 may be used for the effective management of Epilepsy, convulsions. This may improve the patient compliance by showing rapid action via disintegration without difficult in swallowing and side effects which will ultimately improve the therapeutic outcome. We could be able to minimize the per oral cost of the Formulation.

Acknowledgements

None.

Conflicts of interest

The author declares that there is no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. K Kavitha, Kumutha Subramaniam, Boey Jia Hui, et al. Potential Drug Candidates for Fast Dissolving Drug Delivery – A Review. Res J Pharm Bio Chem Sci. 2013;4(4):1510–1526.
  2. Sehgal P, Gupta R, Umesh Kumar S, et al. Fast Dissolving Tablets: A New Venture in Drug Delivery. Amer J Pharm Tech Res. 2012;2(4):252–279.
  3. Md Nehal, Garima G, Pramod KS. Fast Dissolving Tablets: Preparation, Characterization and Evaluation: An Overview. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences Review and Research. 2010;4(2):87–96.
  4. David E, Armen H. T, Ethrin JA, et al. Principles of pharmacology. 2ndedition, The pathophysiologic basis of drug therapy. Wolters Kluwer: India; 2008:815.
  5. Rajeev soni, Galividyasagar. Design and development of quick dissolving tablet Containing loratadine by direct compression method. Int J Pharm Chem Bio Sci. 2013;3(3):771–800.
  6. Gupta A, Mishra AK, Gupta V, et al. Recent Trends of Fast Dissolving Tablet – An Overviewof Formulation Technology. Int J Pharm Bio Arch. 2010;1(1):1–10.
  7. Manivannan R, Oral Disintegrating Tablets: A Future Compaction. Int J Pharm Res Dev. 2009;1(1):1–10.
  8. Farooq MU, Bhatt A, Majid A, et al. Levetiracetam for managing neurologic and psychiatric disorders. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2009;66(6):541–561.
  9. Gambardella A, Labate A, Colosimo E, et al. Monotherapy for partial epilepsy: focus on levetiracetam. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2008;4(1):33–38.
  10. Himanshu Paliwal, Sachin Goyal, Kamal Singh Rathore, et al. Formulation and Evaluation of Levetiracetam Extended Release Tablets. Int J Pharm Sci Rev Res. 2016;41(1):260–266.
  11. Amish Ashvinkumar Dangi, Ganure Ashok L, Jain Divya. Formulation and Evaluation of Colon Targeted Drug Delivery System of Levetiracetam using Pectin as Polymeric Carrier. J App Pharm Sci. 2013;3(1):78–87.
  12. Airaj Mahajabeen, E.Hari Krishna, Ramya Sri Sura. Formulation and evaluation of levetiracetam extended release tablets. World J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2015;4(4):1446–1460.
  13. Sudarshan singh, Shankar Bhavesh, Nayak SanjayKumar, et al. Formulation and evaluation of levetiracetam extended release tablets. Int J pharm sci nanotech. 2013;6(1):1958–1965.
  14. Y Ganesh Kumar, P Goverdhan Reddy, V Kiran Kumar. Formulation design and development of Orodispersible tablets of Levetiracetam. J Pharm Res. 2017;11(6):775–779.
  15. Raghavendra Kumar Gunda, JN Suresh Kumar, S Jayakumari, et al. Formulation Development and Evaluation of Risperidone Fast Dissolving Tablets. J Pharm Res. 2016;10(9):579–588.
  16. Gunda Raghavendra Kumar, JN Suresh Kumar, V Satyanarayana, et al. Formulation Development and Evaluation of Clopidogrel Fast Dissolving Tablets. Iran J Pharm Sci. 2016:12(2):61–74.
  17. Raghavendra Kumar Gunda, Jujjuru Naga Suresh Kumar. Formulation Development and Evaluation of Moxifloxacin. Hcl Fast Dissolving Tablets. Pharm Meth. 2017;8(2):160–167.
  18. Raghavendra Kumar Gunda, JN Suresh Kumar, V Satyanarayana, et al. Formulation Development and Evaluation of Carbamazepine Fast Dissolving Tablets. J Pharm Res.2016;10(5):216–225.
  19. NG RaghavendraRao, Upendra Kulkarni. Development of Carbamazepine Fast Dissolving Tablets: Effect of Functionality of Hydrophillic Carriers on Solid Dispersion Technique. Asian J Pharm Clin Res. 2010;3(2):114–117.
  20. Shiv Shankar Hardenia, GN Darwhekar, Shailesh Sharma, Anu Hardenia. Designing and Pharmaceutical Evaluation of Fast Dissolving Tablet of Fexofenadine Using Coprocessed Superdisintegrants. Int Journal of Pharm Sci Res. 2014;5(7):3018–3030.
  21. Raghavendra Kumar Gunda. Formulation development and evaluation of rosiglitazone maleate sustained release tablets using 32 factorial design. Int J of Pharm Tech Res. 2015;8(4):713–724.
  22. Notari RE. Biopharmaceutics and clinical pharmacokinetics. 4th ed. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc; 1987:6–21.
  23. Higuchi T, Mechanism of sustained–action medication. Theoretical analysis of rate of release of solid drugs dispersed in solid matrices. J Pharm Sci. 1963;51:1145–1149.
  24. Raghavendra Kumar Gunda, Jujjuru Naga Suresh Kumar. Formulation Development and Evaluation of Amisulpride Fast Dissolving Tablets. FABAD J Pharm Sci. 2018;43(2):1105–1015.
  25. Peppas NA. Analysis of fickian and non–fickian drug release from polymers. Pharm Acta Helv. 1985;60:110–111.
Creative Commons Attribution License

©2019 Gunda, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.