The present article aims to indicate on the concept of evolution of the society from one stage to the other leading to the development or changes in the human world followed from the birth of Adam and Eve to the human world and ultimately to the AI which became very popular concept nowadays. Though AI has been dominating the Universe with its enormous capabilities, but should the AI be treated as the end of human world or would it be treated as the part of the mobility of the human world? Raising this unique question the researcher aimed to answer the queries before us, should AI be treated as the end in human mobility or is it a new world that compels the human world to be a part of the evolution in order to maintain its position in the society and vice versa i.e. to erase out.

Keywords: adam and eve, ai, human existence, mobility of human world

"Survival of the fittest”, a phrase originated from Darwinian ideas of evolution explained the mechanism of natural selection or natural human existence. The same concept was brought under the purview of reproductive success or even as "Survival of the form that will leave the most…¹ later on, conformed by Herbert Spencer in his 1852`Theory of Population". Being influenced by Charles Darwin's writing On the Origin of Species as the Principles of Biology of 1864, Spencer<sup>2</sup>  drew parallel thinking in economic theories and Darwin's biological evolution. Hence Darwin`s 'natural selection' was propagated in 1866 by Alfred Russell Wallace `natural “in selection "the evaluation of the society”.<sup>3</sup> H. Spencer had well expressed the same idea through his analysis of the Survival of the Fittest. Hence depending on Herbert Spence’s Survival of the Fittest` the researcher prefers to analyse the changes brought into being in the human from the beginning of the civilization to the 21st century newer development concept. Presently much controversy veered round the concept AI (alternative intelligence) which according to the modern scientist will result in the over howling effect on the society where the human existence will be in question because the technological advancement like AI will very soon replace the human world and will capture a superior position in the society. Considering this as a newer concept of 'natural selection’, the present research aims to look back to the present-day scenario by referring to the innovative society. However, every development brings some changes in the pattern of the society based on the human needs, that may be reflected as an indication to the development of the society to its next echelons but this will be disregarded after a little familiarity". The one who defended his analogy equivalent to language used in chemistry, and to astronomers depicting the "attraction of gravity as ruling the movements of the planets",⁴ or the way in which "agriculturists speak of man making domestic races by his power of selection".⁵ He had "often personified the word Nature; for I have found it difficult to avoid this ambiguity; but I mean by nature only the aggregate action and product of many natural laws,—and by- laws that ascertained sequence of events." but all these analysis veered round the concept evolution. The present research aims to narrate the twenty-first century evaluation from the concept of a changed ideology (AI). In the first four editions of On the Origin of Species, Darwin used the phrase "natural selection".[10] In Chapter 4 of the 5th edition of The Origin published in 1869, Darwin implies again the synonym: "Natural Selection, or the Survival of the Fittest". By "fittest" Darwin meant "better adapted for the immediate, local environment", not the common modern meaning of "in the best physical shape" (think of a puzzle piece, not an athlete If we look to the concept of natural changes in the society from the changed world, the term Natural Selection, will mark in conformity with the mPlanean’s power of selection.⁵ But the expression is focussed from the Herbert Spencer`s ideology of `the Survival of the Fittest` by focusing on the fast changing pattern of the modern world and also by showing how far it fits with the changing trend of the society and human being. By looking back to the three-stage development leading to Chandrayan 3,<sup>6</sup> the ideal example of three stage development. AI and the position of human survival in the reality scenario If merged with the Darwinian concept `The Survival of the fittest` and enjoins it with Herbert Spencer’s ‘The Man Versus the State’, to justify a plausible explanation of human existence in the context of societies and in the context of human survival, the researcher will be able to explain her own points of arguments against the concept AI. The researchers as the contemporary scientific analysts predicts that AI is the fastest way to influence the present day society that will invariably replace the human existence from the world and will be displaced by the Alternative Intelligence and this will dominate the universe as per their own way. The reason for the same as explained by the experts or the scientific analysts from their twofold concepts, the first group talk of increasing importance of artificial intelligence, that will make most people better off over the next decade, but many concerns that advances in AI will affect human existence. Hence, to be productive and to exercise free will, Code-driven systems have spread to more than half of the world’s inhabitant’s. The ambient information and connectivity, offering previously unimagined opportunities and unprecedented threats by living back the arguments that the emerging algorithm-driven artificial intelligence (AI) will continue to spread. Hence the questions remain incomplete unless we explain the cause of such convection under the dilemma of offering a better off position than they are today. However the researchers nullify the issue, and tries to analyse the issue from twofold concepts, i.e. 1) From the Darwinian concept of `Survival of the fittest` and also from the concept of dialectical materialism enunciated by Karl Marx. From the social science point of view, the analysis is expected to be based on the philosophy of ‘evolution’ as proposed by Darwin. Since the ideology of evolution is also promoted by Karl Marx through dialectical materialism based on thesis, anti-thesis and synthesis. The researcher preferred  to analysis the Concept from the human evolution point of view as propagated by Karl Marx but based on Darwinian and Herbert Spencer`s concept of evaluation and by referring to the ideas mentioned hereunder, the researcher prefers to analyse the issue of evaluation from her own point of view. Let us look back to the history of evolution of the society, the theory of evolution by natural selection was conceived independently by Charles Darwin and Alfred Russell Wallace in the mid-19th century as an explanation for why organisms are adapted to their physical and biological environments. The theory was first analysed in Darwin's book’ On the Origin of Species was later on analysed by Karl Marx through the scientific analysis of human existence. According to Karl Marx each generation is based on evaluation on the 21^st century socio-political concept. To take the advantages of previous generation's knowledge to change their society, the world, as well as the German Ideology. Marx highlighted how history is written and its importance revolved round in all our activities and also in our everyday society. Marx`s proposed ideology as expressed in his philosophical ideology as expressed in his concept is interesting. In his understanding, the philosopher must look beneath the common assumptions of society to understand the real truths of society. They must look at history because history contains warnings and assumptions for present day society. Marx uses German history as an example, and notes Germans must look to the past to see what mistakes in the past were carried into their present nation-state. Marx criticizes history and philosophy by arguing that instead of philosophers criticizing what really happened, they use assumptions to criticize what would have happened in an ideal history, resulting in further errors. Marx claims that philosophy must study the authentic history, and what happened in the actual world instead of using Hegel’s ideal world philosophy. (Marx 1843) Marx connects Germany’s use of a theoretical history with the existing German government, arguing the same things that blinded the German people about their past, blind them their present. Marx notes Germany is a “country which shares so naively all the illusions of constitutional statehood without sharing in its realities as so-called constitutional Germany”. (Marx 1843, 9) In his Critique of Hegel, Marx connects religion to history to philosophy to the present in order to argue that to change society for the better, as a whole society must cast off its illusions.

 The researcher while referring to the importance of the evolution. The human society prefers to refer to his own analysis like; ‘each generation builds on the generations before, and takes advantage of previous generation's knowledge to change their society and the world. In cases of AI also the previous generation`s Knowledge is expected to play and important role. Let us look to the beginning of the history of evolution of human world which is based on the upcoming of the two human being like Adam and Eve (said....) and thence forth the human world started increasing in its length and breadth and ultimately formed the whole civilization. The human history speaks of the clan moving from one place to the other for acquiring food for their survival, but in the form of vagabond they used to move from one place to the other for food as they were unable to produce food. In the words of Joseph Frankel, of food making was the outcome of the habit of settlement which men have learnt from the animal world. Hence with the tactics of food making, the concept of feeding and breeding ground was also adopted by the men from the animal world. Being claimed as the highly intelligent living being, men achieved varieties in food production and exchange (named Barter system as the beginning of economics in Human life.) and from then started the economics of Production, consumption and the like. The same theory of evolution as explained by Karl Mark became the land mark for the development of the society into Thesis, Antithesis and Synthesis ,the three stage development of the evolution that revolve in a cyclical way and the synthesis is again converted into thesis ,with the ripening of human intelligence. If this process evolution continues throughout the human history, it is obvious that the evolution of the society will result to the upward mobility of the society as a regular process of evaluation of human history. Under the normal system of evolution, one society is expected to replace the other. As such digitalized world is expected to be evolved and the changes in the society became inevitable. Let us look back to the history of evolution of human world. Form the day of development of human civilization we are always on the move and the mobility is always towards the upward direction making space to feudalism, colonialism and socialism to capitalism and the like. It is easier for us to understand the change or the /mobility from the economic concept. Say for example from the barter system we had adopted transaction and exchange through the involvement of cash .With the use of money value we had been dreaming of the production initially working under the manufacturing world. Hence there came a time where the manufacturing production is being produced but could not satisfy the human needs. It also increased with the ripening of economic tactics in the society. Hence the same production technique reached to its saturation point and the people also like the use of their innovative intervention by demanding the change in the production style from small scale to the large scale production, hence the zeal for more and more production compelled people to look for industrialization. It was in 1699, while the journey for industrialization began from the European world to India and its surroundings, the love for innovation, had compelled the people to continue their journey towards the development and adoption of the policy of Globalization in the economic world, resulting to an enriched system that developed into its saturation point. Hence, this has compelled us to precede towards a change i.e. the industrial world. This has brought into being the Industrial revolution towards a greater strategy which may be explained as journey towards mobility and change. The term revolution therefore indicates a change towards the betterment of the society. Thus we had switched off to industrial world, but the shift was temporary and ultimately we had shifted to globalization, where an overall shift in the society had been observed. The globalization on the one hand brought into being a uniform pattern of transaction associated with the replacement of money transaction to plastic leading to a uniform cash structure throughout the world. The era came to be known as digitalized era and the transaction followed in the system are uniform all over the world. So that money value of different countries had been brought under debit and credit card system as a shift accorded under the 20^th century. Under the 21^st century we started talking of crypto currency as a mode of transaction; likewise we speak of Artificial Intelligence as a digitalized mode of human interaction. This AI as is analysed by many scientists that AI will make human being incapable and will be of no use. Is it really so? If it is true then mobility and change is also true and Through AI we will change ourselves to cope up with the newer world. Those who are capable of doing so will thrive and those who cannot will perish. This is the rule of the world and we are the elements of evolution.

End note

(Read T. H. Huxley’s 1875 Britannica essay on evolution & biology.)In his book Social Statics and in his 1852 essay “A Theory of Population”, Spencer sketched out what that natural development of society would look like. Similar to Darwin, Spencer employed Malthus’s notion of population pressure in a way antithetical to the parson’s own dreary conclusions.

Darwin’s theory of natural selection

In one of the great coincidences of history, Wallace had independently discovered Darwin’s theory of natural selection. This theory became the heart and soul of modern evolution, the idea that had prompted Darwin to exclaim, “I had at last a theory by which to work” (Darwin [1958] 2005, p. 99).

sciencetheory.net › survival-of-the-fittest-19^th Survival of the fittest (19TH CENTURY) - HKT Consultant

Apr 1, 2020. He defended his analogy as similar to language used in chemistry, and to astronomers depicting the “attraction of gravity as ruling the movements of the planets”⁴, or the way in which “agriculturists speak of man making domestic races by his power of selection”⁵. He had “often personified the word Nature; for I have found it difficult ...

Aug 10, 2021 · The term "natural selection" is in some respects as bad one, as it seems to imply conscious choice; but this will be disregarded after a little familiarity". He defended his analogy as

bio.libretexts.org › Bookshelves › Introductory_and18.1B: Charles Darwin and Natural Selection - Biology Libre Texts Oct 31, 2023 · Charles Darwin and Alfred Wallace independently developed the theories of evolution and its main operating principle: natural selection. Wallace travelled to Brazil to collect and observe.

¹survival of the fittest, term made famous in the fifth edition (published in 1869) of Chandrayaan-3 (IPA: / ˌtʃʌndrəˈjɑːn /, ISO: Caṁdrayāna) is the third mission in the Chandrayaan programme, a series of lunar-exploration missions developed by the Indian Space Research are the most successful in surviving and reproducing. Darwin borrowed the term from English sociologist and philosopher Chandrayaan-3 (IPA: / ˌtʃʌndrəˈjɑːn /, ISO: Caṁdrayāna) is the third mission in the Chandrayaan programme, a series of lunar-exploratio n missions developed by the Indian Space Research, who first used it in his 1864 book Chandrayaan-3 (IPA: / ˌtʃʌndrəˈjɑːn /, ISO: Caṁdrayāna) is the third mission in the Chandrayaan programme, a series of lunar-exploration missions developed by the Indian Space Research Spencer came up with the phrase only after reading Darwin’s work.)

²Chandrayaan-3 is the third mission in the Chandrayaan programme, a series of lunar-exploration missions. Indian Space Research.

³https://www.bbc.co.uk/bitesize/guides/zt4f8mn/revision/7

⁴Darwin Charles. The variation of animals and plants under domestication. Internet Archive. 1883;1:

⁵Chandrayaan-3 is the third mission in the Chandrayaan programme, a series of lunar-exploration missions. Indian Space Research.

⁶James Bonnie. Evolution of Karl Marx. Cal State East Bay. 2023.

None.

The author declare that there are no conflicts of interest.