Submit manuscript...
MOJ
eISSN: 2379-6383

Public Health

Research Article Volume 6 Issue 6

The use of maternal health services in Nigeria: does ethnicity and religious beliefs matter?

Abubakar Sadiq Umar

School of Public Health, Walden University, USA

Correspondence: Abubakar Sadiq Umar, School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Walden University, 100 Washington Avenue, South, Minneapolis, MN 55401, USA, Tel +263-785467172

Received: November 16, 2017 | Published: December 11, 2017

Citation: Umar AS. The use of maternal health services in Nigeria: does ethnicity and religious beliefs matter? MOJ Public Health . 2017;6(6):442-447. DOI: 10.15406/mojph.2017.06.00190

Download PDF

Abstract

The social environment is known to influence our attitudes and behavior in all spheres of life including the utilization of maternal health services (MHS). This study was aimed to determine whether Nigerian women’s cultural profile measured by ethnicity and religious beliefs is significantly associated with the use of antenatal care (ANC) and delivery services. A secondary data analysis of the Nigerian Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) was used to explore whether the ethnicity and religious affiliations of women influence the use of ANC and delivery services. A total of 33,385 women (15-49 years) were randomly selected using a stratified two stage cluster sampling from 286 and 602 urban and rural clusters respectively from the 36 states and the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) proportionate to population size of each cluster. Christians have higher proportion of women that had 4 or more ANC visits (28.2%) compared to women belonging to Islamic faith (21.6%). A woman’s religious beliefs was found to be statistically associated with the number of ANC visits (χ2 = 189.956df = 2; p < .001). Christian women are more likely to have 4 or more ANC visits than their Muslim counterparts (AOR = 1.172; CI 1.158 -1.983; p < .001). Christian women are mores 5 times more likely to deliver in a health facility than their Muslim counterparts (UOR = 5.181; CI 4.844 - 5.542). However, after adjusting for confounding, this association was no longer statistically significant (AOR = 1.308; CI 0.987-1.733; p > .05). The odds of a Yoruba woman (South west) giving birth in a health facility is 35 folds compared to a Hausa woman (UOR = 34.817; CI 30.233-40.097), followed by Igala in the North central (UOR = 29.723; CI 21.509-41.076) and Igbo in the south east (UOR = 26.562; CI 23.035-30.63) This association remained statistically significant even after controlling for confounding. This study ethnicity and religious beliefs to a lesser extent have influenced the use of ANC and delivery services in Nigeria. Policy makers should consider systematic and deliberate involvement of tribal and religious leaders when formulating strategies to reach ethnic nationalities.

Keywords: Ethnicity; Religious beliefs; Utilization; Antenatal; Delivery services

Introduction

Although there has been significant reduction in the total number of maternal deaths worldwide, however, many developing countries like Nigeria have not been able to achieve MDG 5 by the end of 2015 [1]. This is buttressed by the fact that Nigeria and India recorded 58,000 (19%) and 45,000 (15%) maternal deaths respectively accounting for 34% of the total global maternal deaths [1]. Moreover, 59% of maternal deaths occurred in six Africa Countries (Democratic Republic of Congo, Ethiopia, Kenya, Nigeria, Tanzania and Uganda) and four Asian countries (Bangladesh, India, Indonesia, and Pakistan) [2].

The high number of maternal deaths in Nigeria may partially be due to low use of MHS [3]. Nearly half of the estimated 8.3 million pregnant women in 2010 had no antenatal care. Moreover, among those that had reported to have had antenatal care (ANC), only 55% of them had made four or more ANC visits before delivery [3]. Fewer proportions (38%) of deliveries were attended by skilled health workers in Nigeria [3]. The Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) estimated a maternal mortality ratio of 545 per 100,000 live births, with the true values likely ranging from 475 deaths in the south-western zones to 615 deaths in the north-eastern zone per 100,000 live births [4]. This is an underestimation compared with the reported 630 per 100,000 live births [3] and might be due to low sensitivity of maternal death surveillance [5] and poor record keeping of vital events such as births and deaths [6]. Women living in the Northern regions of Nigeria have the highest risk of dying from pregnancy and delivery complications compared with women residing in other regions of the country [4]. These national level performances does not reflect the significant disparities that exist between the various geopolitical zones that have predominant ethnic group and in most instances such ethnic groups are adherents of Christian or Islamic faiths.

Various studies from all parts of the world have reported that cultural factors such as ethnicity and religious beliefs influence the use of maternal health services and need to be taken into consideration for any effective intervention [7-13]. This approach has been will covered in some parts of south America [10]. Furthermore, WHO considers the inclusion of approaches that address ethno-religious barriers as good practices that will facilitate the optimal utilization of ANC, natal and post natal maternal health services [12,13]. Hence, among possible ways to improve pregnancy outcome is by understanding the underlying causes of disparities within a given country or geopolitical region. Religion and ethnicity are part of the fabrics of culture of defined population and has been reported as a pointer to low utilization rate of maternal health services and poor pregnancy outcomes even in developed [14-16] and developing countries [17-19]. In general, poor pregnancy outcome has been reported to be common among pregnant women with low use of ANC and delivery services [20,21]. In Nigeria, the low rate of ANC and delivery was partly due to cultural factors such as ethnicity and religious beliefs [22,23] and low level of female autonomy which is driven by religion and ethnic beliefs [24-26]. The role of ANC in averting pregnancy related deaths and other forms of poor pregnancy outcomes such as vesico-vaginal fistula was further underscored by WHO in late 2016 that the recommended number of ANC visits should now be at least 8 instead of 4 for optimal pregnancy outcomes [27]. The implementation of the new recommendation requires an understanding of the cultural setting of a given area in order to develop ethno-religious appropriate communication strategies in order to sensitize communities on the new number of ANC visits expected during pregnancy. The approach further requires the systematic engagement for proactive involvement and participation of the leaders (tribal, religious, traditional, political, etc) [27]. Hence, this work intend to understand whether Nigerian women’s cultural profile measured by ethnicity and religious beliefs is significantly associated with the frequency of the utilization of ANC and delivery services.

Methods

Nigeria has an estimated population of 143 million. Women 15-49 years and annual number of pregnancies were estimated to be 31.4 million and 8.3 million respectively [4]. The country has 36 states and a federal capital territory (FCT). The 36 states and FCT were grouped into six geopolitical zones: South-south zone is mainly inhabited by Kalbiri, Ijaw, Ikoi, Itsekiri, and Ibibio; Yoruba in the South west zone as the principal ethnic group; North Central zone consist of Nupe, Ebira, Idoma, Tivs, Igala, Gwari, and Angas; the major tribal groups in the North East are Kanuri, Fulani, Marghi, Babur, Mumuye, and Jukun; the Igbos are the dominant tribe in the South East; while the North west zone are mostly belonging to Hausa and Fulani tribal groups. Islam and Christianity are the dominant religions having followership of about 99% of Nigerians in the Northern and Southern geopolitical zones respectively. This study is secondary data analysis using the raw data of the Nigerian Demographic and Health Survey (DHS). A two stage stratified cluster design was applied to select and interview 33,385 female participants in the reproductive age group (15-49 years) from 286 and 602 for urban and rural areas respectively [4]. However, only the data of 31,815 (95.3%) were found to be complete and therefore, used in the analysis of this study. Details on sampling, training of interviewers, instruments of data collection and data storage were available online in the Demographic and Health report (DHS) [4].

Religious beliefs of women was coded as 1 for Muslims, code 2 for Christians and Traditional religion as code 3. Muslim women were compared to women of other religion. Ethnicity of women was coded as 1 for Hausa, 2 for Yoruba, 3 for Igbos, 4 for Fulani, 5 for Ijaw/Izom, 6 for Ibibio, 7 for Tiv, 8 for Kanuri/Baribari, 9 for Ekot, 10 for Igala and 11 for others which comprises of the remaining 364 ethnic groups [4]. Those belonging to the Hausa ethnic group were compared to other ethnic groups. The research question of this study is: are Nigerian women’s cultural profile measured by ethnicity and religious beliefs are significantly associated with the frequency of the antenatal care visits (ANC) and choice of place of delivery? The outcome variables are dichotomous categorical (had four ANC visits/had < four ANC visits; and delivered at home/delivered in hospital). Bivariate Pearson Chi-square statistic and Multivariate logistic regression were conducted at 95% confidence interval to test the following null hypothesis:

  1. H02A: There is no significant statistical association between the religious beliefs of women and their use of MHS as measured by the number of antenatal visits and place of delivery.
  2. Ha2A: There is a significant statistical association between the religious beliefs of women and their use of MHS as measured by the number of antenatal visits and place of delivery.
  3. H02B: There is no significant statistical association between the ethic affiliation of women and their use of MHS as measured by the number of antenatal visits and place of delivery.
  4. Ha2B: There is a significant statistical association between the ethnic affiliation women and their use of MHS as measured by the number of antenatal visits and place of delivery.

Similar analytical approach using DHS data to determine the variables that influence the use of maternity and child services in Nigeria were conducted [28,29]. The theoretical framework for the study was the Anderson health behaviour model [30,31], which consisted of construct on individual characteristics such as ethnicity/tribe and religion that explains differences in the utilization of health services. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Walden University, Minneapolis, USA through a communication dated 24th January, 2015 with approval reference number 01-23-15-0338613. Permission to use the DHS raw data was granted by ORC Macro and ICF International, Calverton Maryland, USA.

Results

Cultural characteristics of respondents

The ethnic distribution showed that, out of the 31,985 of women, the Hausas (21.3%), Igbo’s (14.4%), Yoruba’s (13.3%) and Fulani’s (7.6%) accounted for 56.6% of the whole sample. Yoruba women from south west zone of Nigeria have the highest use rate for ANC (36.8%), while the Kanuri/Beriberi women of North east zone had the lowest of 14.6% (Table 1). Islam and Christianity are the dominant religions accounting for 46.8% and 51.6% respectively (Figure 1). Moreover, Christians have higher proportion of women that had 4 or more ANC visits (28.2%) compared to women belonging to Islamic faith (21.6%). A woman’s religious beliefs was found to be statistically associated with the number of ANC visits (χ2 = 189.956df = 2; p < .001). Christian women are more likely to have 4 or more ANC visits than their Muslim counterparts (AOR = 1.172; CI 1.158-1.983; p < .001) (Table 2). Religion has significant statistical association with the place of delivery (χ2 = 2542.37df = 2; p < .001) (Table 3). Christian women are mores 5 times more likely to deliver in a health facility than their Muslim counterparts (UOR = 5.181; CI 4.844-5.542). However, after adjusting for confounding, this association was no longer statistically significant (AOR = 1.308; CI 0.987-1.733; p > .05) (Table 3).

Figure 1: Proportion of ANC visits made by religious beliefs of women.

Independent Variable

Proportion of Samples (%)

Number of ANC Visits

< 4

4

Ethnicity

Hausa

21.3

83.4

16.6

Yoruba

14.4

63.2

36.8

Igbo

13.3

73.1

26.9

Fulani

7.6

85.3

14.7

Ijaw/Izom

3.6

80.4

19.6

Ibibio

2.1

72.7

27.3

TIV

2.8

81

19

Kanuri/baribari

2.6

85.4

14.6

Ekot

1.8

68.5

31.5

Igala

1.6

70.8

29.2

Others

29.1

71.6

28.4

Table 1: The frequency of antenatal care visits by respondent’s ethnic affiliation.

 

 ANC Visits

 

Bivariate Analysis

Multivariate Logistic Regression Analysis

 

 

 

 

< 4 Visits

4 Visits

Pearson’s Chi-square

UOR

95% CI for AOR

AOR

P Values

95% CI for AOR

Religion

 

 

 

 

Lower limit

Upper limit

 

 

Lower Limit

Upper Limit

Islam

11680

3218

0.001*

1.000

 

 

1.000

 

 

 

Christianity

11776

4628

 

1.426

1.354

1.502

1.172

0.001*

1.158

1.983

Traditional

412

101

 

0.89

0.713

1.11

1.202

0.231

0.889

1.624

Table 2: Association between woman’s religious beliefs and the number of antenatal visits.

*p is significant at the 0.05 level.

Note: Variables adjusted in the model: income, parity, education, age and distance

 

Place of Delivery

Bivariate Analysis

Multivariate Logistic Regression Analysis

Home

Facility

Pearson’s Chi-square

UOR

95% CI for UOR

AOR

P value

95% CI for AOR

Religion

Lower Limit

Upper Limit

Lower Limit

Upper Limit

Islam

8002

1909

0.001*

1.000

1.000

Christianity

3397

4199

5.181

4.844

5.542

1.308

0.611

0.987

1.733

Tradition

296

43

0.609

0.441

0.842

0.492

0.932

0.198

1.219

Table 3: Association between women’s religious beliefs and the place of delivery.

*p is significant at the 0.05 level.

Note: Variables adjusted in the model: income, parity, education, age, availability of skilled health worker and distance.

Ethnicity

ANC Visits

Bivariate Analysis

Multivariate Logistic Regression Analysis

<4visits

>4visits

Pearson Chi-square

UOR

95% CI for UOR

AOR

P values

95% CI for AOR

Lower Limit

Upper Limit

Lower Limit

Upper Limit

Hausa

5670

1130

0.001*

1.000

1.000

Yoruba

2908

1694

2.923

2.678

3.19

1.272

0.015*

1.048

1.143

Igbo

3119

1147

1.845

1.681

2.005

0.889

0.346

0.696

1.135

Fulani

2061

355

0.864

0.759

0.984

0.727

0.121

0.62

1.853

Ijaw/

913

223

1.226

1.045

1.438

0.54

0.011*

0.417

0.699

Ibibio

481

181

1.888

1.573

2.266

0.964

0.808

0.717

1.296

TIV

723

170

1.18

0.987

1.411

0.685

0.441

0.532

1.884

Kanuri/Beriberi

707

121

0.859

0.701

1.062

0.545

0.211

0.429

1.692

Ekot

391

180

2.31

1.915

2.787

1.079

0.626

0.794

1.467

Igala

367

151

2.065

1.69

2.521

1.186

0.25

0.887

1.586

Others

6657

2636

1.987

1.837

2.148

1.191

0.011*

1.041

1.163

Table 4: Association between the tribal/ethnic affiliation of women and the number of antenatal visits.

*p is significant at the 0.05 level.

Note: Variables adjusted in the model: education, income, autonomy, religion, geopolitical zone of residence, and place of domicile.

Ethnicity

Place of Delivery

Bivariate Analysis

Multivariate Logistic Regression Analysis

Home

Facility

Pearson’s Chi-square

UOR

95% CI for UOR

AOR

P values

95% CI for AOR

Lower Limit

Upper Limit

Lower Limit

Upper Limit

Hausa

4377

464

0.001*

1.000

1.000

Yoruba

453

1672

34.817

30.233

40.097

2.318

0.002*

1.36

3.954

Igbo

467

1315

26.562

23.035

30.63

2.13

0.037*

1.046

4.339

Fulani

1573

135

0.81

0.663

0.989

1.473

0.197

0.818

2.654

Ijaw/Izom

416

129

2.925

2.349

3.643

0.326

0.088

0.155

0.686

Ibibio

146

135

8.722

6.774

11.232

0.703

0.37

0.325

1.521

TIV

270

218

7.616

6.22

9.326

2.595

0.031*

1.092

6.17

Kanuri/Beriberi

501

47

0.885

0.647

1.211

0.977

0.956

0.425

2.245

Ekot

246

145

5.56

4.434

6.973

0.49

0.053

0.238

1.008

Igala

53

167

29.723

21.509

41.076

9.902

0.001*

3.913

25.062

Others

3273

1747

5.035

4.502

5.631

1.082

0.72

0.703

1.665

Table 5: Association between the tribal/ethnic affiliation of women and the place of delivery.

*p is significant at the 0.05 level.

Note: Variables adjusted in the model: education, income, religion, geopolitical zone of residence, availability of skilled health worker and place of domicile.

Ethnicity showed a statistically significant variation (χ2 = 900.570; df = 10; p < .001) within and between the geopolitical zones of northern and southern Nigeria (Table 4). For instance, the highest proportion of women who had four or more ANC visits in order of magnitude were the Yoruba’s (South west), Ekot (South-south), Igala (North central), Ibibio (South-south) and Igbos (South east). The lowest belonged to Kanuri/Baribari (north east), Hausa (North west) and Tiv (North central). The Fulani’s of the North east and North west zones had higher proportion of women who have made four or more ANC visits compared to ethnic groups of the south such as Ijaw/Izom (South-south) and approximate what is observed among the Igbo’s of the south east zone (Table 4). Compared to the Hausa’s (North West), the odds for a Yoruba woman have adequate number of ANC is three fold (UOR = 2.923; CI 2.678-3.19), followed by Ekot (UOR = 2.31; CI 1.915-2.787), Igala (OR = 2.065; CI 1.69-2.521) and Ibibio (UOR = 1.88; CI 1.573-2.266) (Table 4). Women belonging to the Hausa ethnic group (Northern Nigeria) were 1.2 times less likely to achieve the 4 recommended number of ANC visits compared to Yoruba women (Southern Nigeria) even when covariates were controlled (AOR = 1.272; CI 1.048-1.543; p < .05) (Table 4). There appeared to be an association between ethnicity and place of delivery (χ2 = 5329.865; df = 10; p < 0.001) (Table 5). The highest proportion (≥70%) of women who delivered in a health facility in order of magnitude were the Yoruba’s in the South west (78.7%), Igala in the North central (75.9%), and Igbos in the South east (73.8%). The lowest belonged to Fulani in the north east (7.9%), Kanuri/Beriberi, north east (8.6%), and Hausa in the North West (9.6%). The odds of a Yoruba woman (South west) giving birth in a health facility is 35 folds compared to a Hausa woman (UOR = 34.817; CI 30.233-40.097), followed by Igala in the North central (UOR = 29.723; CI 21.509-41.076) and Igbo in the south east (UOR = 26.562; CI 23.035-30.63) (Table 5). This association remained statistically significant even after controlling for confounding.

Discussions on Findings

In this study, ethnicity and to a lesser extent religion were found to influence the use of MHS with women belonging to Hausa-Fulani and kanuri/Bari-Bari ethnic groups and Muslims less likely to achieve the recommended number of ANC visits and deliver in a health facility. Plausible explanations include lower levels of female literacy [4-33], empowerment [34], and autonomy [23] among the Hausa-Fulani and kanuri/Bari-Bari women compared to even women in belonging to other ethnic groups of northern Nigeria such as Igala and the Tivs. This finding was consistent with other studies where it has been documented that ethno-religious belief influenced the use of MHS [32-36]. Female autonomy was further reported to be low among the Hausa-Fulani and kanuri/Bari-Bari ethic groups of Northern Nigeria due to adherence to aged long stereotyping as to what is an ideal woman that was based on ethnic and religious norms, beliefs, traditions and practices which was reported to result in low use of MHS and higher incidence of poor pregnancy outcomes in developing [29-39] and developed countries [15-40]. However, it should be noted that failure to attain the recommended number of ANC visits and to deliver in a health facility will invariably defeat the basic objective of Maternal health Services such as promoting the health of women through health education, counseling, vaccination, family planning, chemo-prophylaxis against malaria, minerals, vitamins and nutritional supplements (iron, and folic acid, screening and early detection of high-risk pregnancies. The low utilization of ANC and delivery services among the Muslim Hausa-Fulani and kanuri/Bari-Bari women as observed in this study is consistent with other reports that indicated that the odds for a Muslim woman to achieve the recommended number of ANC visits and or deliver in modern health facility is very low compared to their Christian counterparts residing in the same geographical area and belong to same socio-economic level [37].

However, previous reports noted that the effect of ethnicity and religious beliefs on the use of MHS was inconsistently after controlling for educational attainment and the level of income. For instance, although in this study, the Yoruba ethnic group was found to have the highest proportion of women who had the recommended number of ANC visit and delivery in a health facility. However, Adelaja [41] reported that about 70% of Christian Yoruba’s had delivered at home despite the fact that majority of them are literate, employed and have higher autonomy compared to the Muslim Hausa-Fulani and kanuri/Bari-Bari ethnic groups [4-34]. Religious and ethnic beliefs and practices may affect the rate of utilization of MHS as exemplifies by a study among the Hausa Fulani of North western Nigeria that women preferred to deliver in homes because they consider the lithotomy position and being supervised by not a close relative as embarrassing [42]. Similar findings were reported from some countries in Southern Africa [43], West Africa [44], and South East Asia [45,46]. Hence, the observed ethno-religious influence on the use of MHS underscored the need for systematic and consistent pro-active involvement and participation of community, religious and tribal leaders in the planning, implementation, and monitoring of population based MHS in order to enhance ownership, commitment and oversight functions.

Conclusion and Recommendations

The findings of my study have demonstrated that:

  1. Ethnicity and to a lesser extent religion were found to influence the use of MHS with women belonging to Hausa-Fulani and kanuri/Bari-Bari ethnic groups have the lowest proportion of women who had achieved the recommended number of ANC visits and or delivered in a health facility;
  2. Women belonging to Islamic faith were less likely to make the recommended number of ANC visits and or deliver in health facility;
  3. The lower utilization rate for ANC and delivery services was lower among Hausa-Fulani and kanuri/Bari-Bari ethnic groups even after controlling for confounders such as education, income, place of domicile, availability of skilled health workers, and distance;
  4. These findings have underscored the need for systematic and consistent pro-active involvement and participation of community, religious and tribal leaders in the planning, implementation, and monitoring of population based MHS in order to enhance ownership, commitment and oversight functions.

Strengths and Weaknesses of this Study

The large sample size (33,385) and the recruitment of participants across various strata using stratified two stage cluster sampling had strengthened the external validity and generalizability of the findings of this study [47]. However, the DHS being a cross-sectional study design does only demonstrate an existing association (not causality) between ethnicity and religious beliefs and the use of ANC and delivery services.

Acknowledgement

The author extends his sincere thanks to Dr. Chinaro Kennedy; Dr. Hebatullah Tawfik and Dr. Daniel Okenu all of Walden University, USA, for their immense contribution in all aspect of this work. I would also like to thank and acknowledge ORC Macro and ICF International Calverton Maryland, USA for granting me the permission to use the DHS dataset.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

  1. (2017) World Health Statistics 2017. World Health Organization, Switzerland, pp. 1-116.
  2. (2017) Trends in Maternal Mortality: 1990 to 2015, Estimates by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group and the United Nations Population Division. World Health Organization, Switzerland, p. 1-92.
  3. (2013) World Health Statistics 2013. World Health Organization, Switzerland, pp. 1-172.
  4. National Population Commission (Nigeria), ICF Macro (2009) Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey 2008. USA, pp. 1-661.
  5. (2013) Maternal death surveillance and response: Technical guidance, Information for action to prevent maternal death. World Health Organization, Switzerland, pp. 1-128.
  6. (2007) Primary Health Care in Nigeria: 30 years after Alma-Ata, The Nigerian Health Review, Health Reform Foundation of Nigeria, Mmm-nat Educational Window Consultant Ltd, Nigeria.
  7. Camacho AV, Castro MD, Kaufman R (2006) Cultural aspects related to the health of Andean women in Latin America: A key issue for progress toward the attainment of the Millennium Development Goals. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 94(3): 357-363.  
  8. Mackian S, Bedri N, Lovel H (2004) Up the garden path and over the edge: where might health-seeking behaviour take us?. Health Policy Plan 19(3): 137-146.
  9. Miller T (1995) Shifting boundaries: Exploring the influence of cultural traditions and religious beliefs of Bangladeshi women on prenatal interactions. Women's Studies International Forum 18(3): 299-309.
  10. Simwaka BN, Theobald S, Amekudzi YP, Tolhurst R (2005) Meeting millennium development goals 3 and 5. BMJ 331(7519): 708-709.
  11. (2003) Working with individuals, families and communities to improve maternal and neonatal Health. World Health Organization, Switzerland, p. 1-63.
  12. (2005) World Health Report 2005-make every mother and child count. World Health Organization, Switzerland.  
  13. (2007) Maternal mortality in 2005: Estimates developed by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, and the World Bank. World Health Organization, Switzerland, p. 1-48.  
  14. Jomeen J, Redshaw M (2013) Ethnic minority women's experience of maternity services in England. Ethn Health 18(3): 280-296.  
  15. Lyons SM, O’Keeffe FM, Clarke AT, Staines A (2008) Cultural diversity in the Dublin maternity services: the experiences of maternity service providers when caring for ethnic minority women. Ethn Health 13(3): 261-276.
  16. Phillimore J (2015) Delivering maternity services in an era of super diversity: the challenges of novelty and newness. Journal of Ethnic and Racial Studies 38(4): 568-582.
  17.  Evans EC (2013) A review of cultural influence on maternal mortality in the developing world. Midwifery 29(5): 490-496.
  18. Mselle LT, Moland KM, Mvungi A, Evjen OB, Kohi TW (2013) Why give birth in health facility? Users’ and providers’ accounts of poor quality of birth care in Tanzania. BMC Health Serv Res 13: 174.
  19. Owais A, Faruque AG, Das SK, Ahmed S, Rahman S, et al. (2013) Maternal and Antenatal Risk Factors for Stillbirths and Neonatal Mortality in Rural Bangladesh: A Case-Control Study. PLoS One 2013 8(11): e80164.
  20. (2015) Maternal health, World Health Organization, Switzerland.
  21. World Health Organization, UNICEF, UNFPA, The World Bank (2010) Trends in Maternal Mortality: 1990 to 2008. Switzerland, p. 1-52.
  22.  Coast E, Jones E, Portela A, Lattof SR (2014) Maternity Care Services and Culture: A Systematic Global Mapping of Interventions. PLoS One 9(9): e108130.
  23. Titaley CR, Hunter CL, Dibley MJ, Heywood P (2010) Why do some women still prefer traditional birth attendants and home delivery?: A qualitative study on delivery care services in West Java Province, Indonesia. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 10: 43.
  24. Umar AS (2017) Women Autonomy and the use of Antenatal and Delivery Services in Nigeria. MOJ Public Health 6(2): 00161.  
  25. Adamu YM, Salihu HM (2002) Barriers to the use of antenatal and obstetric care services in rural Kano, Nigeria. J Obstet Gynaecol 22(6):600-603.
  26. Idris SH, Gwarzo UMD, Shebu AU (2006) Determinants of place of delivery among women in semi urban settlement in Zaria, Northern Nigeria. Annals of African Medicine, 5(2): 68-72.
  27. (2016) WHO recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience, World Health Organization, Switzerland, pp. 1-172.
  28. Antai D (2009) Faith and child survival: the role of religion in childhood immunization in Nigeria. J Biosoc Sci 41(1): 57-76.
  29. Fapohunda B, Orobaron N (2014) Factors influencing the selection of delivery with no one present in Northern Nigeria: implications for policy and programs. Int J Women’s Health6: 171-183.
  30. Andersen RM (1995) Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: does it matter? J Health Soc Behav 36(1): 1-10.
  31. Andersen RM, Newman JF (2005) Societal and individual determinants of medical care utilization in the United States. Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc 51(1): 95-124.
  32. Akinbi JO, Akinbi YA (2015) Gender Disparity in Enrolment into Basic Formal Education in Nigeria: Implications for National Development. Afr Res Rev 9(3): 11-23.
  33. Umar AS (2017) Does Female Education explain the disparity in the use of Antenatal and Natal Services in Nigeria? Evidence from Demographic and Health Survey Data. Afr Health Sci 17(2): 391-399.
  34. Umar AS (2017) Female Economic Empowerment as a Significant Factor of Social Exclusion on the use of Antenatal and Natal Services in Nigeria. MOJ Women’s’ Health 5(2): 00118.
  35. Nmadu G, Avidime S, Oguntunde O, Dashe V, Abdulkarim B, et al. (2010) Girl Child Education: Rising to the challenge. Afr J Reprod Health 14(3): 107-112.
  36. Okafor VE, Arinze FO (2012) Gender accessibility and equality in education: The implication to manpower in Nigeria. Afr Res Rev 6(3): 284-290.
  37.  Babalola S, Fatusi A (2009) Determinants of use of maternal health services in Nigeria-looking beyond individual and household factors. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth9: 43.
  38.  Doctor HV, Bairagi R, Findley SE, Helleringer S, Dahiru T (2011) Northern Nigeria, Maternal, Newborn, and Child Health Program: Selected analysis from population based baseline study. The Open Demography Journal 4: 11-21.
  39. Fawole AO, Shah A, Fabanwo AO, Adegbola O, Adewunmi AA, et al. (2012) Predictors of maternal mortality in institutional deliveries in Nigeria. Afr Health Sci 12(1): 32-40.
  40.  Handerson J, Gao H, Redshaw M (2013) Experiencing maternity care: the care received and perceptions of women from different ethnic groups. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 13: 196.
  41. Adelaja LM (2011) A survey of home delivery and newborn care practices among women in suburban area of South western Nigeria. ISRN Obstet Gynecol 2011: 983542.
  42.  Ityavyar DA (1984) A traditional midwife practice in Sokoto state, Nigeria. Soc Sci Med18(6): 497-501.
  43.  Wabiri N, Chersich M, Zuma K, Blaauw, D, Goudge J, et al. (2013) Equity in maternal health in South Africa: Analysis of health service Access and health Status in a National Household Survey. PLoS One 8(9): e73864.
  44. Ganle JK, Parker M, Fitzpatrick R, Otupiri E (2014) Inequities in accessibility to and utilisation of maternal health services in Ghana after user-fee exemption: a descriptive study. Int J Equity Health 13: 89.
  45. Anwar I, Nababan HY, Mostari S, Rahman A, Khan JAM (2015) Trends and Inequities in Use of Maternal Health Care Services in Bangladesh 1991- 2011. PLoS One 10(3): e0120309.
  46. Saxena D, Vangani R, Mavalankar DV, Thomsen S (2013) Inequity in maternal health care service utilization in Gujarat: analyses of district level health survey data. Glob Health Action 6: 1-9.  
  47. Szklo M, Nieto FJ (2014) Understanding a Lack of Validity: Bias in Epidemiology: Beyond the basics. (3rd edn), Jones and Bartlett, UK.
Creative Commons Attribution License

©2017 Umar. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.