Submit manuscript...
MOJ
eISSN: 2374-6912

Cell Science & Report

Review Article Volume 5 Issue 3

Osteoblast proliferation and apoptosis in platelet-derived growth factor incubated allograft and bioceramic bone grafts in human osteoblast cell culture

Nese Kahraman,1 Neslihan Abaci,2 SemaSirma Ekmekci,2 Cagri Akcay,1 Aris Cakiris,2 Banu Gurkan Koseoglu1

1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Istanbul University, Turkey
2Department of Genetics, Istanbul University, Turke

Correspondence: Banu Gurkan Koseoglu, Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Istanbul University, Istanbul Universitesi Agiz Dis Cene Cerrahisi Kat: 0Sehremini/Istanbul Turkey

Received: December 12, 2018 | Published: December 28, 2018

Citation: Kahraman N, Abaci N, Ekmekci SS, et al. Osteoblast proliferation and apoptosis in platelet-derived growth factor incubated allograft and bioceramic bone grafts in human osteoblast cell culture. MOJ Cell Sci Rep. 2018;5(3):83-87. DOI: 10.15406/mojcsr.2018.05.00121

Download PDF

Abstract

Background: Several methods exist for tissue regeneration following bone loss in oral cavity. Bioceramic graft materials and allografts are often preferred given their biocompability and ease of use in clinical settings. Increasing osteoblastic activity by adding different substances to bone graft materials is a commonly studied topic in medicine. Growth factors play an important role in bone regeneration. The purpose of this study was to investigate osteoblast proliferation and apoptosis in platelet-derived growth factor incubated allograft and tricalcium phosphate bone grafts. We examined the effect of growth factors on human cells in vitro at 24, 48 and 72hours. We analyzed 6 main groups and 18 subgroups using MTT and ALP tests. Our results show higher osteoblast proliferation in the control group compared with all other groups. PDGF increased proliferation of osteoblasts in the first 24 h, with no effect after 24h. Tricalcium phosphate graft material increased proliferation in the early period, but reduced proliferation after 24 hours due to phosphate ion release. Our results suggest PDGF, in combination with allograft, is more effective for osteoblast proliferation compared with other materials. Therefore, a carrier material should be used with rhPDGF for most effective treatment outcomes.

Keywords: PDGF, allograft, bioceramic, osteoblast, cell culture

Introduction

Bone defects resulting from tumors, diseases, infections, trauma, biochemical disorders, and abnormal skeletal development pose a significant health problem.1,2 Allografts are derived from same species with different genotypes. They are found in many forms, including dust, cortical and cancellous chips, gel, collagen sponge, cancellous and cortical blocks, and demineralized bone matrix.3,4 Allografts generally have osteoconductive properties.5 Tricalcium phosphates (TP) is a natural component of hard tissue and constitutes 60-70% of bone.6 Given that TP has a more porous structure than hydroxyapatite, it undergoes biological degradation 10-20 times more rapidly.7 Growth and differentiation factors are partially, or completely, inactivate precursor molecules that are activated by a proteolytic mechanism. Growth factors affect cell growth and/or differentiation with local or systemic routes. They play a critical role in tissue repair during embryonic development. Growth factors in bone development include platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), transforming growth factor (TGF), insulin growth factor (IGF) and bone morphogenetic protein (BMP).8,9

PDGF plays a mitogen role for mesenchymal cells by stimulating DNA and protein synthesis in the bone.10,11 PDGF is a powerful chemotactic factor for osteoblasts, fibroblasts, macrophages, leukocytes and mesenchymal progenitor cells.12,13 According to experimental research, PDGF plays a role in wound healing and stimulates the formation of new blood vessels.11 Growth factors within demineralized freeze-dried bone allografts (DFDBA) are extracted during the demineralization process, rendering the allograft incapable of spontaneous osteogenesis. However, adding exogenous growth factors to DFDBA enhances the osteogenic capacity of native osteoblasts.1

The purpose of this study was to analyze osteoblast proliferation and apoptosis in platelet-derived growth factor incubated allograft and tricalcium phosphate bone grafts.

Methods

This research was conducted in collaboration with Istanbul University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Istanbul University, Institute of Experimental Medicine Research, Department of Genetics. In vitro human origin cell cultures were examined at 24, 48, and 72h. Six main groups and 18 subgroups were analyzed with MTT and ALP tests. Friedman test was used for repeat measurements of multiple group comparisons. Kruskal-Wallis test was used for inter-group comparisons. Post Hoc Dunn’s multiple comparison test was used for subgroup comparisons. MinerOss (USA)(Size: 0.60-1.25 mm)(1.0 cc) was used as allograft material and CompactBone S (Germany)(Size: 0.50-1.0 mm)(1.0 cc) as tricalcium phosphate graft material. rhPDGF-AA (5μg) was obtained from NovaTeinBio Company. rhPDGF-AA was dissolved in 1 ml sterile distilled water before use according to manufacturers instructions. Sustained human-induced osteoblast cell cultures (hFOB 1.19) were obtained from American Type Culture Collection Company(ATCC) (Rockville, MD, USA).

The production of continuous cell culture

Osteoblast culture conditions were prepared according to the manufacturer's protocol. Osteoblast cells in 2ml tubes were removed from liquid nitrogen and placed in 37°C water bath. Cells were cultured in DMEM and F12 medium (1: 1 mixture of the medium)(Lonza, Belgium) (10% fetal bovine serum, 2.5 mM L-glutamine, 0.3 mg/ml G418) and seeded onto tissue culture flasks (25 cm2) placed in 5% CO2 and 95% normal air in a 37°C saturated steam CO2 incubator (Therma Form Direct Heat Incubator, USA). Cells were divided into 6 main groups, with 18 sub-groups, organized according to 24h, 48h, and 72h in vitro examinations.

  1. Group: Control group
  2. Group: rhPDGF-AA group (only growth factor was applied)
  3. Group: Allograft group (only allograft was applied)
  4. Group: Bioceramic group (only tricalcium phosphates was applied)
  5. Group: rhPDGF-AA incubated allograft group
  6. Group: rhPDGF-AA incubated tricalcium phosphates group

Osteoblast cells

Developmental stage completed culture flasks were removed from incubation and washed with PBS. The cells were separated from the surface with Trypsin-EDTA solution mixed with 20ml medium, centrifuged at 1500rpm for 3 minutes. One ml of this solution was used for cell viability assay and counted with a Vi-Cell device (Vi-Cell XR, Beckman Coulter, USA). After 2 weeks of passages, cell count was measured at 13.6 x106. The survival rate was 96.7%.

Osteoblast cell culture

5 x 104 cells were added to each well of a 96 well cell culture plate (TPP, Switzerland) in a volume of 200μl. Allograft and tricalcium phosphates grafts were incubated separately in a CO2 incubator at 37°C for 3hours. Graft materials were incubated with 2ng/ml in concentrated rhPDGF-AA. According to the specified groups, 3mg grafts were placed in each well. The graft materials were measured with a sensitive electronic scale and added to wells with a sterile surgical curette. Each experiment was repeated with 5 samples.

MTT Test

100μl of media was extracted from from 96 well osteoblast cell culture using mini-pipettes. 10μl of MTT reagent was added, gently mixed in an orbital shaker for 1 minute and incubated for 3-4hours in a CO2 incubator at 37°C. Remainder of medium was discarded and 100μl Cristal Dissolving Solution was added to the wells. The wells were measured in ELISA microplate reader (ELX800 Universal Microplate Reader, BIO-TEK Instruments, USA) at 570nm. MTT kit (Cell Proliferation Assay Kit, Cayman, USA).

ALP Assay

When cell density reached 1x105 cells in each well, cells were washed with PBS and homogenized in Assay Buffer. Samples were taken from each 96 well and transferred to 0.2mL eppendorf tubes. Cells were centrifuged for 3min at 13,000g, supernatant discarded and assay buffer added above for a total of 80μl. 50μl of 5mMpNPP solution was added to each well and incubated 60min at 25°C in dark conditions. 20ml of Stop Solution was added to stop reactions The plate was placed in an orbital shaker for 1minute. Samples were measured on ELISA microplate reader at 405nm. ALP kit (Biovision, USA).

Statistical methods

Friedman test was used for multiple group comparisons, Kruskal-Wallis test was used for inter-group comparisons and Post Hoc Dunn's multiple comparison tests were used for sub-group comparisons.

Results

MTT Assay

The MTT assay measures cell viability. We found the average cell viability in the 24.h control group was significantly higher compared with bioceramic and bioceramic + rhPDGF-AA groups (p=0,016, p=0,009).The 48h control group was significantly higher than all other groups. The 48 h bioceramic+rhPDGF-AA group was significantly lower compared with rhPDGF-AA and Allograft + rhPDGF-AA groups (p=0.009, p=0.047). The 72h rhPDGF-AA group was significantly lower than all other groups (p=0.009, p=0.028) (Table 1). The 24h rhPDGF-AA group was significantly lower than allograft +rhPDGF-AA group (p=0,028), and higher than bioceramic +rhPDGF-AA group (p=0,028). The 72h bioceramic+ rhPDGF-AA group was significantly higher than bioceramic +rhPDGF-AA group (p=0,047). Our results show the 72h bioceramic+rhPDGF-AA group was significantly lower than rhPDGF-AA and Allograft + rhPDGF-AA groups (p=0.009, p=0.047). The 72h rhPDGF-AA group was significantly lower than all other groups (p=0.009, p=0.028). These results show PDGF is least toxic to cells.

Post HocDunn’s multiple comparison test

24.hours

48.hours

72.hours

control group/rhPDGF-AAgroup

0,175

0,016

0,016

control group/Allograft group

0,076

0,009

0,917

control group/Bioceramicgroup

0,016

0,009

0,465

control group/Allograft +rhPDGF-AAgroup

0,602

0,009

0,754

control group/Bioceramic + rhPDGF-AAgroup

0,009

0,009

0,175

rhPDGF-AAgroup/Allograft group

0,917

0,076

0,009

rhPDGF-AAgroup/Bioceramicgroup

0,175

0,076

0,028

rhPDGF-AAgroup/Allograft +rhPDGF-AAgroup

0,028

0,602

0,009

rhPDGF-AAgroup/Bioceramic

0,028

0,009

0,028

Allograft group/Bioceramicgroup

0,917

0,754

0,175

Allograft group/Allograft +rhPDGF-AAgroup

0,117

0,251

0,754

Allograft group/Bioceramic + rhPDGF-AAgroup

0,347

0,347

0,076

Bioceramicgroup/Allograft +rhPDGF-AAgroup

0,009

0,251

0,175

Bioceramicgroup/Bioceramic + rhPDGF-AAgroup

0,076

0,465

0,917

Allograft +rhPDGF-AAgroup/Bioceramic + rhPDGF-AAgroup

0,009

0,047

0,047

Table 1 MTT assay findings according to Post HocDunn’smultiple comparison test for each experimental group

ALP Assay

We found the 24h allograft +rhPDGF-AA group was significantly lower compared with control and rhPDGF-AA and Bioceramic +rhPDGF-AA groups (p=0.016, p=0.028). Results show the 24h rhPDGF-AA group was significantly higher compared with allograft group (p=0.016). We found no significant differences among other groups (p> 0.05)(Table 2). We found the 48h control group was significantly higher than Allograft, Bioceramic, Allograft + rhPDGF-AA groups (p=0.048, p=0.009). And, the 48h rhPDGF-AA group was significantly higher compared with both allograft and allograft + rhPDGF-AA groups (p=0.009, p=0.028) (Figure 1). The 48h allograft group was significantly lower than bioceramic and bioceramic + rhPDGF-AA groups (p=0,009). The 72h control group was significantly higher compared with all other groups (p=0,047, p=0,009). The 72h rhPDGF-AA group was significantly higher than allograft and allograft + rhPDGF-AA groups (p=0,009). The 72h allograft group was significantly lower than bioceramic and bioceramic + rhPDGF-AA groups (p=0,009). The 72h allograft + rhPDGF-AA group was significantly lower than bioceramic and bioceramic + rhPDGF-AA groups (p=0,009).

Post HocDunn’s multiple comparison test

24.hours

48.hours

72.hours

control group/rhPDGF-AAgroup

0,465

0,173

0,016

control group/Allograft group

0,117

0,009

0,009

control group/Bioceramicgroup

0,117

0,047

0,047

control group/Allograft +rhPDGF-AAgroup

0,028

0,009

0,016

control group/Bioceramic + rhPDGF-AAgroup

0,251

0,293

0,028

rhPDGF-AAgroup/Allograft group

0,016

0,028

0,009

rhPDGF-AAgroup/Bioceramicgroup

0,117

0,465

0,754

rhPDGF-AA group/Allograft +rhPDGF-AAgroup

0,028

0,009

0,009

rhPDGF-AAgroup/Bioceramic + rhPDGF-AAgroup

0,465

0,754

0,834

Allograft group/Bioceramicgroup

0,754

0,117

0,009

Allograft group/Allograft +rhPDGF-AAgroup

0,347

0,009

0,602

Allograft group/Bioceramic + rhPDGF-AAgroup

0,175

0,047

0,009

Bioceramicgroup/Allograft +rhPDGF-AAgroup

0,076

0,009

0,009

Bioceramicgroup/Bioceramic + rhPDGF-AAgroup

0,251

0,602

0,754

Allograft +rhPDGF-AAgroup/Bioceramic + rhPDGF-AAgroup

0,028

0,009

0,009

Table 2 ALP assay findings according to Post HocDunn’smultiple comparison test for each experimental group

Figure 1 ALP Findings.

Discussion

Many methods are used for tissue regeneration following bone loss in the oral cavity. Bioceramic graft materials and allografts are often preferred given their biocompatibility and ease of use in clinical settings. Increasing osteoblastic activity by adding substances in bone graft materials is commonly studied in various fields in medicine and biology. Growth factors play an effective role in bone regeneration. Bone tissue regenerates itself. However, in conditions of excessive tissue loss such as traumatic, degenerative, inflammatory, infectious, cystic and neoplastic conditions, the regeneration ability is not sufficient for optimal recovery. Primary cells mimic in vivo conditions. However, limited life span, slow growth and genetic differences create problems in the use of primary cells.14 In this study, we used human-induced permanent osteoblast cell cultures (ATCC, American Type Culture Collection, Rockville, MD, USA- hFoB 1.19). They have the advantage of having similar metabolic potential to original cells, reproducing very quickly with no genetic differences.

A key component of successful in vitro cell culture is cell-material contact. Cell-material contact can be created by solution, direct or indirect methods. Shaini et al.15 reported that direct contact of cells with the material is a more advantageous strategy of reflecting in vivo conditions. Thus, we used the direct contact method in our study to assess the biocompatibility of experimental models with target cells. PDGF is stored in the bone matrix1,2 and released upon activation of osteoblasts, resulting in new bone formation.16,17 In vitro studies have demonstrated that PDGF initially stimulates bone resorption and stimulates the proliferation and chemotaxis of osteoblasts.18,19 PDGF is found in high concentrations in the early phase of wound healing and increases the synthesis and release of other supporting growth factors such as IGF. Recombinant PDGF increases resistance to tensile forces on surgery wounds and accelerates healing of chronic wounds.10,20

The clinical effectiveness of rhBMP-2 and PDGF vary according to the time of application and duration of release. In the initial hours after wounds, the demolition phase, conditions are hypoxic and acidic. Our results demonstrate that PDGF destruction suffered in the early days. Uchida et al.21 showed the porosity and grain size of graft materials affects proliferation of osteoblast cells. Pioletti et al.22 have shown that Calcium phosphate bone graft particles, smaller than 100μ, reduced osteoblast proliferation and alkaline phosphatase activity. In addition, the small particles have a negative impact on the viability of osteoblasts. In our study, Compact Bone S with 500-1000μ particle size and Mineross® with 600-1250μ particle size were used. Bloemers et al.23 studied the use of calcium phosphate grafts in bone defects from trauma. They reported calcium phosphate is the most preferred graft group because of higher bioavailability and successful osteogenesis. Tricalcium phosphate’s porous structure mimicks cancellous bone trabecular structures. The small pores in this material structure allow shape bone cells, nutrients, growth factors, capillary vessels and phagocytic cells to interact.

Knabe et al.24 studied cell proliferation in two separate studies by generating primary rat bone marrow cells over calcium phosphate graft materials in different compositions for 14days. At the end of the study they found a high rate of phosphate release from all calcium phosphate bone grafts. Tricalcium phosphate graft material induced bone formation. Previous reports show the control group has maximum cell coated surface. Our results are consistent with their findings. In our MTT study, we found the control group had significantly higher viability compared with other groups (p=0.016, p=0.009). Sun et al.25 evaluated the biocompatibility of HA and β-TKF in myoblasts and fibroblasts cell cultures. According to ALP assays, the number of cells increased in the first 3days, then decreased. As a result, β-TKF and HA showed inhibitory effects on cell proliferation. They explained the cause of this inhibition in the cells with high rate secretion of Prostoglandin E2. In our study, the ALP average of bioceramic group was significantly higher in the first 3days compared with the allograft group. Zambonin et al.26 reported tricalcium phosphate, in combination with hydroxyapatite grafts, had phosphate ion oscillation, which inhibited osteoblast proliferation. In our study, osteoblast cell proliferation in bioceramic groups were significantly lower compared with allograft groups.

Conclusion

  1. Higher osteoblast proliferation in the control group compared with other groups. In the early period the proliferation of osteoblast cells that don’t have contact with graft material and growth factors was higher.
  2. PDGF increased the proliferation of osteoblasts in the first 24h. After 24h due to the absence of carrier material it is subjected to degradation without any contribution to proliferation.
  3. Tricalcium phosphate graft material increased proliferation in the early period. However, it played a negative role in proliferation due to phosphate release after 24hours.
  4. rhPDGF-AA in combination with allograft was more effective and successful in osteoblast proliferation compared with other materials. As a result, carrier material should be used with rhPDGF-AA for optimal effectiveness.

Funding details

No funding.

Acknowledgements

No acknowledgements.

Conflict of interest

Authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

References

  1. Mellonig JT, Bowers GM, Bright RW, et al. Clinical evaluation of freeze-dried bone allografts in periodontal osseous defects. J Periodontol. 1976;47(3):125–131.
  2. Urist MR. Bone formation by autoinduction. Science, 1965;150(3698):893–899.
  3. Eppley BL, Pietrzak WS, Blanton MW. Allograft and alloplastic bone substitutes: a review of science and technology for the craniomaxillofacial surgeon. J Craniofac Surg. 2005;16(6):981–989.
  4. Nandi SK, Roy S, Mukherjee P, et al. Orthopaedic applications of bone graft & graft substitutes: a review. Indian J Med Res. 2010;132:15–30.
  5. Urist MR, Huo YK, Brownell AG, et al. Purification of bovine bone morphogenetic protein by hydroxyapatite chromatography. Proc Natl AcadSci U S A. 1984;81(2):371–375.
  6. Swart JGN, Redjo BV, de Groot K. Porous calcium phosphates as alveolar bone implant. J Dent Res. 1979;58: 2267.
  7. Chew KK, Low KL, Sharif Zein SH, et al. Reinforcement of calcium phosphate cement with multi-walled carbon nanotubes and bovine serum albumin for injectable bone substitute applications. J MechBehav Biomed Mater. 2011;4(3):331–339.
  8. Ripamonti U, Reddi A. Tissue engineering, morphogenesis and regeneration of the periodontal tissues by bone morphogenetic proteins. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 1997;8(2):154–163.
  9. Shimono M, Ishikawa T, Ishikawa H, et al. Regulatory mechanisms of periodontal regeneration. Microsc Res Tech. 2003;60(5):491–502.
  10. Giannobile WV, Hernandez RA, Finkelman RD, et al. Comparative effects of platelet-derived growth factor-BB and insulin-like growth factor-I, individually and in combination, on periodontal regeneration in Macacafascicularis. J Periodontal Res. 1996;31(5):301–312.
  11. Centrella M, McCarthy TL, Kusmik WF, et al. Relative binding and biochemical effects of heterodimeric and homodimeric isoforms of platelet-derived growth factor in osteoblast- enriched cultures from fetal rat bone. J Cell Physiol.1991;147(3):420–426.
  12. Bouletreau PJ, Warren SM, Spector JA, et al. Factors in the fracture microenvironment induce primary osteoblast angiogenic cytokine production. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;1:139–148.
  13. Missbach M, Jeschke M, Feyen J, et al. A novel inhibitor of the tyrosine kinase Src suppresses phosphorylation of its major cellular substrates and reduces bone resorption in vitro and in rodent models in vivo. Bone. 1999;24(5):437–449.
  14. Thonemann B, Schmalz G, Hiller KA, et al. Responses of L929 mouse fibroblasts, primary and immortalized bovine dental papilla-derived cell lines to dental resin components. Dent Mater. 2002;18(4):318–323.
  15. Shaini FJ, Shelton RM, Marquis PM, et al. In vitro evaluation of the effect of freshly mixed amalgam and gallium- based alloy on the viability of primary periosteal and osteoblast cell cultures. Biomaterials. 2000;21(2):113–119.
  16. Schwartz Z, Mellonig J, Carnes D, et al. Ability of commercial demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft to induce new bone formation. J Periodontol. 1996;67(9):918–926.
  17. Shteyter A, Kaban L, Kao R. Effects of demineralized bone power on osteoblast-like cells in culture. A potential rapid quality control assay. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1990;19:370–373.
  18. Pfeilschiftler J, Oeeschsner M, Naumann A, et al. Stimulation of bone matrix apposition in vitro by local growth factors. A comparison between insulin- like growth factor-I, platelet-derived growth factor and transforming growth factor. Endocrinology.1990; 127(1):69–75.
  19. Schwartz Z, Somers A, Mellon- ig J, et al. Ability of commercial demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft to induce new bone formation is dependent on donor age but not gender. J Periodontol. 1998;69(4):470–478.
  20. Hsu C, Chang J. Clinical implications of growth factors in flexor tendon wound healing. J Hand Surg Am. 2004;29(4):551–563.
  21. Uchida A, Nade S, McCartney E, et al. Growth of bone marrow cells on porous ceramics in vitro. J Biomed Mater Res. 1987;21(1):1–10.
  22. Pioletti DP, Takei H, Lin T, et al. The effects of calcium phosphate cement particles on osteoblast functions. Biomaterials. 2000;21(11):1103–1114.
  23. Bloemers FW, Pakta P, Bakker HJ, et al. The use of calcium phosphates as a bone substitute material in trauma surgery. Osteosynthesis Trauma Care. 2002;10(1):33–37.
  24. Knabe C, Gildenhaar R, Berger G, et al. Morphological evaluation of osteoblasts cultured on different calcium phosphate ceramics. Biomaterials. 1997;18(20):1339–1347.
  25. Sun JS, Tsuang YH, Yao CH, et al. Effects of calcium phosphate bioceramics on skeletal muscle cells. J Biomed Mater Res.1997;34(2):227–233.
  26. Zambonin G, Grano M. Biomaterials in orthopaedic surgery: effects of different hydroxyapatites and demineralized bone matrix on proliferation rate and bone matrix synthesis by human osteoblasts. Biomaterials. 1995;16(5):397–402.
Creative Commons Attribution License

©2018 Kahraman, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.