MOJ ISSN: 2374-6912 MOJCSR

Cell Science & Report
Case Report
Volume 4 Issue 5 - 2017
Female with 46x+ (Marker) Chromosome with Gonadal Dysgenesis: A Case Report
Shoba Rani*, Annie Q Hasan and Sunitha Mishra
Designation Geneticist, University Kamineni Institute of Medical Sciences, India
Received: October 21, 2017 | Published: December 18, 2017
*Corresponding author: Shoba Rani, Designation Geneticist, University Kamineni Institute of Medical Sciences, India, Tel: 9032763326; E-mail:
Citation: Rani S, Hasan AQ, Mishra S (2017) Female with 46x+ (Marker) Chromosome with Gonadal Dysgenesis: A Case Report. MOJ Cell Sci Rep 4(5): 00103. DOI: 10.15406/mojcsr.2017.04.00103


Congenital anomalies; Primary amenorrhea; Phytohaemagglutinin


The association of congenital anomalies, primary amenorrhea is often present in individuals with chromosome abnormalities. Chromosomal abnormalities are frequent events with global incidence 7.6 million and in India its prevalence is 66 per 1000 births. Among these congenital malformations are responsible for 15% of perinatal mortality in India. Primary amenorrhea associated with these abnormal karyo types are approx 3.3%.


PA: Primary Amenorrhea; CA: Congenital Anomaly

Aims and Objectives

The present study aimed to analyze the chromosomal changes in case referred to the Department of Genetics, KIMS, Narketpally.


The venous blood was collected from peripheral blood vessel, cultured for 72 hour using Roswell Park Memorial Institute Medium (RPMI) with phytohaemagglutinin (PHA). Chromosomes were analyzed after G banding followed by karyo typing [1-5].


The case referred to the department showed marker chromosome.


 A 17 year’s old unmarried female presented in gynecology out-patient department with complaints of not having attained menarche. There was no family history of congenital urogenital disorders. On examination, she was a hirsute female, with no secondary sexual characters. She had clitoromegaly with well developed labia major. Her ultrasound revealed absent uterus and ovaries. Her renal function tests were normal and her hormonal profile revealed normal estrogen, progesterone, luteinizing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone values. Chromosome analysis of the patient revealed 46X+ marker karyo type. Further molecular analysis is suggested for confirmation of marker chromosome (Figure 1) [5-10].

Figure 1: Cytogenetic analysis shows 46 X+ Marker karyo type.


Chromosomal aberrations represent a major etiologic factor in PA. The role of Genetics in terms of diagnosis risk assessment and genetic counselling is significant and identification of marker chromosomes is important for Genetic counselling. Molecular analysis should be done after cyto genetics for confirmation. After excluding the non genetic causes by clinicians cases should receive prompt referral for genetic study [11-15].


No acknowledgement.

Conflict of Interest

No conflict of interest.


  1. Laxmi KV, Babu SJ, Dayakar S, Mehrothra RN, Goud KI (2012) Cytogenetic investigation of patients with primary amenorrhea. Indian J Hum Genet 18(1): 112-116.
  2. Rajangam S, Nanjappa L (2007) Cytogenetic studies in amenorrhea. Saudi Med J 28(2): 187-192.
  3. Jyothy A, Kumar KS, Swarna M, Sekhar M Raja, Devi B Uma, et al. (2002) Cytogenetic investigations in 1843 referral cases of disordered sexual development from Andhra Pradesh, India. Int J Hum Genet 2(1): 55-59.
  4. Mueller RF, Young ID, editors (2001) Emery's elements of medical genetics. (11th edn), Edinburgh, pp. 1-384.
  5. Park YS, Kang KC (1999) Cytogenetic study of primary amenorrhea. Korean J Obstet Gynecol 42: 814-820.
  6. Speroff L, Glass RH, Kase NG (1999) In: Clinical Gynecologic Endocrinology and Infertility. (6th edn), USA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, pp. 421-476.
  7. Suri M, Kabra M, Jain U, Sanders V, Saxena R, et al. (1995) A clinical and cytogenetic study of Turner syndrome. Indian Pediatr 32(4): 433-442.
  8. Ten SK, Chin YM, Noor PJ, Hassan K (1990) Cytogenetic studies in women with primary amenorrhea. Singapore Med J 31(4): 355-359.
  9. Doody KM, Carr BR (1990) Amenorrhea. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 17(2): 361-387.
  10. 14th Annual report Geneva (1985) World Health Organization, Special Programme of Research Development and Research training in Human Reproduction, pp. 114-119.
  11. Anglani F, Baccichetti C, Artifoni L, Lenzini E, Tenconi R (1984) Frequency of abnormal karyo types in relation to the ascertained method in females referred for suspected sex chromosome abnormality. Clin Genet 25: 242-247.
  12. Opitz O, Zoll B, Hansmann I, Hinney B (1982) Cytogenetic investigation of 103 patients with primary or secondary amenorrhea. Hum Genet 65(1): 46-47.
  13. Wyss D, DeLozier CD, Daniell J, Engel E (1982) Structural anomalies of the X chromosome: personal observation and review of non-mosaic cases. Clin Genet 21(2): 145-159.
  14. Seabright M (1971) A rapid banding technique for human chromosome. Lancet 2(7731): 971-972.
  15. Moorhead PS, Nowell PC, Mellman WJ, Battips DM, Hungerford D (1960) Chromosome preparations of leucocytes cultured from human peripheral blood. Exp Cell Res 20: 613-616.
© 2014-2018 MedCrave Group, All rights reserved. No part of this content may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means as per the standard guidelines of fair use.
Creative Commons License Open Access by MedCrave Group is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at
Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version | Opera |Privacy Policy