Submit manuscript...
Journal of
eISSN: 2373-4426

Pediatrics & Neonatal Care

Research Article Volume 10 Issue 3

Breast self examination by female students of the universite officielle de ruwenzori, butembo city, democratic republic of Congo

Kambale Mastaki J,1 Kalondero J,2 Munzombo T,2 Mutume Kabila T,2 Ngwala Ngwala B2

1Departments of Public Health, University of Goma UNIGOM (Goma city) and Official University of Ruwenzori UOR, Democratic Republic of Congo
2Department of Public Health, Official University of Ruwenzori UOR (Butembo city), Democratic Republic of Congo

Correspondence: Kambale Mastaki J, Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine of the “Université Officielle de Ruwenzori” (UOR) Butembo (DR Congo), Tel +243 975681731/ +39 3803645249

Received: May 13, 2020 | Published: May 29, 2020

Citation: Mastaki KJ, Kalondero J, Munzombo T, et al. Breast self examination by female students of the universite officielle de ruwenzori, butembo city, democratic republic of Congo. J Pediatr Neonatal Care. 2020;10(3):71-77. DOI: 10.15406/jpnc.2020.10.00415

Download PDF

Abstract

Introduction

Breast self-examination is one of the most effective measures strongly recommended for the prevention of breast cancers by means of early detection.

Material and method

An institution and self-administered questionnaire based cross-sectional survey was conducted among female students of the Université Officielle de Ruwenzori (UOR), Butembo city, in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) during the academic period 2018 to 2019.

Results

215 female students out of 358 were included (response rate: 60.00%). Age mean and median were 22.74 years (95%CI: 22.25-23.24) and 22.00 years respectively. Most of them belonged to Nande/Yira tribe (81.55%; 95%CI: 75.61%-86.31%), the Faculty of Medicine (56.34%; 95%CI: 49.55%-62.90%) and catholic religion (53.49%; 95%CI: 46.75%-60.11%). The absolute majority of them had a basic knowledge about breast self-examination (BSE) (79.44%; 95%CI: 73.45%-84.37%) while only a slight majority has performed BSE at least once (55.71%; 95%CI: 48.88%-62.34%). Only the course of study (Medicine), residence (Butembo city), having basic knowledge about breast cancers and BSE impacted significantly on practice of BSE (Pearson chi2 p-values of 0.028, 0.037, 0.003 and 0.000 respectively). Finally, logistic regressions showed that only basic knowledge about BSE was associated with its practice. The relationship was strong (OR: 6.641; 95%CI: 2.823-15.620).

Conclusion

The large majority of UOR’s female students have basic knowledge about breast cancers and BSE. However, this fact is not automatically translated in a good appropriate health behavior meaning BSE. More effective sensitization has to be done in order to fix this health problem.

Keywords: breast cancer, breast self-examination, female students, butembo, Democratic Republic of Congo

Introduction

Human cancer is a major public health problem worldwide despite that important historical evidence shows that it is avoidable.1,2 The worldwide burden of cancer is no longer confined predominantly to the industrialized, wealthy countries but is spreading and will soon shift to low- and medium-resource countries.3 Breast cancer is a malignant proliferation of epithelial cells lining the ducts or lobules of the breast. It is a hormone-dependent disease.4 Women without functioning ovaries who never receive estrogen-replacement therapy do not develop breast cancer. It occurs mostly in women, but men can also be affected.5 The female-male ratio is about 150:1.6 It is one of the most commonly diagnosed cancers worldwide, which accounted for 1.7 million (11.9%) in 2012, and there were 6.3 million women alive who had been diagnosed with breast cancer in the past 5 years.5 Despite an increased global effort to reduce the incidence, it continues to be the most common cancer and the second leading cause of cancer deaths in women in the United States of America (USA).5,7 Recent evidence suggests that its incidence has begun to decline in the USA.8 Breast and cervical cancers are among the leading female cancers in Sub Saharan Africa.9‒11 Breast cancer incidence rate in that region was estimated to be around 25.5 per 100,000 and the mortality rate 19.3 per 100,000; for the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) the incidence rate was 23.5 per 100,000 during year 2012.12 In odds with USA trend, the incidence of breast cancer rates is rapidly increasing in Africa.10,13‒16

Early detection in order to improve breast cancer outcome and survival remains the cornerstone of breast cancer control.17 Breast self-examination (BSE), an important component of the prevention, has been showed to empower women, taking responsibility for their own health.18 BSE is a “procedure in which a woman inspects and examines her breasts and their accessory structures for evidence of change that could indicate an abnormal process”. It is one of the three tests the American Cancer Society (ACS) recommends in order to help detect breast cancer in its earliest stages.5,6 It is a simple, very low-cost, non-invasive early detection method and the easiest and cost-effective way of early detection of breast cancer that should be done for all women older than 20 years.19‒22 Women should be strongly encouraged to examine their breasts monthly.6 The recommended screening methods for early detection of breast cancer include a monthly BSE (10). Mortality from breast cancer could be reduced through early detection. Unfortunately, many studies show that only 20% to 25% of women routinely examine their breasts.23,24 Despite the increasing incidence of breast cancer in sub-Sahara Africa,9,16, 25 little is known about BSE patterns in the continent.10,25,26 Available publications on the subject include institutions-based such as hospitals and colleges.9‒11,19,25 This study aims to assess the levels of knowledge and practice of BSE among female students of the “Université Officielle de Ruwenzori” (UOR) a public college located at Butembo city, East of DRC. Potentially associated factors will be investigated.

Materials and methods

Setting

Butembo: a city of around one million people located in the East part of the DRC.

UOR: a public college with 1034 students during the academic period 2018 to 2019, a population distributed by sex as following: males (674; 61.18%), females (358; 34.62%). Eight faculties or schools are organized at the institution: Medicine, law, economics, engineering/applied sciences, sciences, social sciences, communications and information sciences and psychology.

Design of the study

A period cross-sectional and university-based survey was adopted and conducted during the academic year 2018 to 2019. The tool adopted was a self-administered structured questionnaire with closed responses.

Target and study populations

Target population: female students of the UOR.

Study population: Female students, aged 18 to 45 years, registered at UOR during the academic year 2018 to 2029 and physically present at Butembo city during the study period.

Sampling and sample size

All eligible female students as defined above had to be included (universal sampling). At completion of the study 215 out of 358 were included (response rate: 60.00%).

Data management and statistical analysis

Variables consisted of selected socio demographics (age, ethnicity/tribe, residence, marital status, Faculty attended, academic levels and religion) and health-related factors (knowledge about breast cancers and BSE, value of BSE, technique of BSE, recommended frequency of BSE etc.). Data of interest were manually extracted from questionnaires. They then were transferred in a Microsoft Office Excel 2016 spreadsheet and finally in the statistical package Stata 15/IC. Data quality assessment was performed by a systematic check of possible abnormalities (missing values, outliers, impossible values, inconsistent values) fixed when present. Several variables were transformed in binary’s ones. Analysis began by descriptive statistics including Shapiro-Wilk test for normality assessment of age. Then followed Pearson chi-squared test (binay variables). We finally performed multiple logistic regressions. Models building was based on the “backwise stepwise selection” technique while the post logistic Hosmer-Lemeshow test and ROC curve were used for model goodness-of-fit assessment. A p-value of <0.05 was considered significant. All the analyses were carried out by means of the statistical package STATA 15/IC.27

Results

215 female students were included out of 358 eligible (response rate: 215/358=60.00%). The distribution of age’s sample was not Gaussian (Shapiro-Wilk: p<000). Age mean and median were 22.74 years (95%CI: 22.25-23.24) and 22.00 years respectively. Most of them belong to Nande/Yira tribe (81.55%; 95%CI: 75.61%-86.31%), were attending the Faculty of Medicine (56.34%; 95%CI: 49.55%-62.90%) and are related to Catholic religion (53.49%; 95%CI: 46.75%-60.11%). Regarding health-related factors, the absolute majority of them showed to have some basic knowledge about breast cancer (96.74%; 95%CI: 93.29%-98.45% ), BSE (79.44%; 95%CI: 73.45%-84.37%), the value of BSE for early detection of breast cancer (64.49%; 95%CI: 57,79%-70,66%) while only a slight majority reported having performed BSE at least once (55.71%; 95%CI: 48.88%-62.34%). Finally, the minority of them reported a family’s history of breast cancer (18.22%; 95%CI: 13.57%-24.02%) and knew how to perform BSE (39.72%; 95%CI: 33.33%-46.48%). Bivariate analyses showed that factors associated to BSE were attendance of the Faculty of Medicine (Pearson chi2: p=0.028) and being resident at Butembo city (Pearson chi2: p=0.037) while in logistic regression only having basic knowledge about BSE significantly impacted BSE practice. Detailed results are presented in tables and figures below (Figures 1&2) (Tables 1-6).

Figure 1 Age Distribution. var2=Age  UOR= Université Officielle de Ruwenzori DRC=Democratic Republic of Congo.

Figure 2 Post logistic regression ROC curve. ROC: Receiver operating curve.

Observ.

Pr (Skewness)

Min

Max

Q1

Q2

(median)

Q3

IQR

Mean

95%CI

(mean)

196

0.000

18

40

21

22

23.5

2.5

22.74

22.25

23.24

Table 1 Age (years) characteristics
Observ, observations Pr, p-value Min, minimum Max, maximum Q, quartile IQR, interquartile range CI, confidence interval %, percentage

Variables

Number of observations

Categories

Proportion

95% CI

Ethnicity

 

Nande/Yira

81.55%

75.61%

86.31%

 

N=206

Other tribes

17.96%

13.27%

23.86%

 

 

No determined

0.49%

0.07%

3.42%

 

Faculty

 

 

Medicine

 

56.34%

 

49.55%

 

62.90%

 

 

Applied Sciences

 

3.76%

 

1.88%

 

7.37%

 

 

N=213

Law

11.27%

7.64%

16.31%

 

 

Economics

14.55%

10.40%

20.00%

 

 

Psychology

8.92%

5.74%

13.61%

 

 

Sciences

5.16%

2.87%

9.12%

 

Academic level

 

 

« Graduat » 1

 

30.05%

 

24.23%

 

36.59%

 

« Graduat » 2

31.92%

25.97%

38.54%

 

N=213

« Graduat » 3

16.43%

12.01%

22.08%

 

 

« Licence » 1

17.84%

13.23%

23.62%

 

 

« Licence » 2

3.76%

1.88%

7.37%

 

Residence

 

N=213

 

Butembo city

 

95.77%

 

92.04%

 

97.80%

 

 

Other locations

2.35%

0.97%

5.55%

 

 

No determined

1.88%

0.70%

4.93%

 

Marital status

 

 

Singles

 

88.79%

 

83.77%

 

92.39%

 

Married                    or similars

 

 

 

 

 

 

N=214

9.81%

6.46%

14.63%

 

 

Widower

0.47%

0.06%

3.29%

Table 2 Other socio demographics
N, number of observations; %, percentage; CI, confidence interval

Variables

Number observations

Categories

Proportion   

95% CI

 

Basic

 

OUI

96.74%

93.29%   

98.45%

knowledge breast cancer

N=215

NON

3.26%

1.55%

6.71%

 

 

Je ne sais pas/ Je ne me rappelle pas

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic knowledge BSE

 

OUI

79.44%

73.45%

84.37%

 

N=215

NON

16.82%

12.35%

22.49%

 

 

Je ne sais pas/Je ne rappelle pas

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3.74%

1.87%

7.33%

 

 

 

 

 

 

Family’s history of breast cancer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yes

18.22%

13.57%

24.02%

 

N=214

No

57.48%

50.70%

63.98%

 

 

Don’t know/ Don’t

 

 

 

 

 

remember

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

BSE useful breast cancer early detection?

N=214

Yes

64.49%

57.79%

70.66%

 

 

No

18.69%

13.98%

24.53%

 

 

Don’t know/ Don’t

 

 

 

 

 

remember

 

 

 

 

 

 

16.82%

12.35%

22.49%

 

 

 

 

 

 

Do you know how to perform BSE?

N=214

Yes

39.72%

33.33%

46.48%

 

 

No

51.40%

44.67%

58.09%

 

 

Don’t know/ Don’t

 

 

 

 

 

remember

8.88%

5.71%

13.54%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

From birth

3.85%

1.92%

7.54%

 

 

From puberty

57.69%

50.82%

64.28%

 

 

>=20 years

6.73%

4.01%

11.09%

 

 

>=30 years

0.48%

0.07%

3.38%

Recommended age initiation BSE

N=215

After menopause

30.77%

24.83%

37.42%

 

 

Don’t know/ Don’t

 

 

 

 

 

remember

0.48%

0.07%

3.38%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Daily

36.67%

30.37%

43.45%

 

 

Weekly

15.71%

11.36%

21.33%

 

 

Monthly

12.86%

8.94%

18.15%

Frequency recommended BSE

N=215

Yearly/annual

0.95%

0.24%

3.77%

 

 

Don’t know/ Don’t

 

 

 

 

 

remember

33.81%

27.69%

40.53%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

During menstruations

21.36%

16.25%

27.54%

Appropriate moment BSE

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A week before menstruations

15.53%

11.17%

21.20%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

During pregnancy

 

 

 

 

N=215

 

0.97%

0.24%

3.84%

 

 

During breastfeeding

 

 

 

 

 

 

6.80%

4.05%

11.19%

 

 

Don’t know/ Don’t remember

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

55.34%

48.44%

62.04%

 

 

 

 

 

 

BSE

 

Yes (n=117)

55.71%

48.88%

62.34%

performed at least once

N=215

No

40.00%

33.54%

46.83%

 

 

Don’t know/ Don’t remember

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4.29%

2.23%

8.07%

Table 3 Health related factors
N, number of observations; %, percentage; CI, confidence interval; BSE, breast self-examination

Factor

Categories

BSE n (%)

Pearson chi2

Ethnicity

Yira/Nande

89 (52.98%)

Pr=0.511

 

Others

28 (58.33%)

 

 

School/Department

 

Faculty of Medicine

 

73 (60.83%)

 

Pr=0.028

 

Other Faculties

44 (45.83%)

 

 

Academic level

 

“Licence”

 

23 (46.94%)

 

Pr=0.248

 

“Graduat”

94 (56.29%)

 

 

Residence

 

Butembo city

 

114 (55.88%)

 

Pr=0.037

 

Others locations

3 (25.00%)

 

 

Religion

 

Catholics

 

60 (56.44%)

 

Pr=0.531

 

Others religions

57 (56.44%)

 

Table 4 Association selected socio demographic factors and breast self-examination (bivariate analysis)
N, number of observations; %, Percentage; CI, confidence interval; BSE, breast self-examination;Pr, p-value

Factor

Categories

BSE n (%)

Pearson chi2

Basic knowledege breast cancer

Yes

117 (56.25%)

Pr = 0.003

No

0 (0.00%)

 

 

Family’s history of breast cancer

 

Yes

 

23 (58.97%)

 

Pr = 0.506

 

No

94 (53.11%)

 

 

Basic knowledge BSE

 

Yes

 

109 (64.12%)

 

Pr = 0.000

No

8 (17.39%)

 

Table 5 Association selected health-related factors and breast self-examination (bi variate analysis)
N, number of observations; %, percentage; CI, confidence interval; BSE, breast self-examination;Pr, p-value

BSE

Odds Ratio

Std. Err.

z

P>z

[95% Confidence Interval]

Faculty (reference=Medicine)

1.247

0.386

0.71

0.477

0.678

2.289

Residence (Reference=Butembo)

3.396

2.461

1.69

0.092

0.820

14.058

Entendu parler BSE

6.641

2.898

4.34

0.000

2.823

15.620

_cons

0.075

0.060

-3.23

0.001

0.015

0.360

Table 6 Association selected factors and breast self-examination (Logistic regression)
BSE, breast self-examination logistic regression; Number of observations, 208 LR chi2(3)=29.64
Prob > chi2=0.0000 Log likelihood = -127.72519, Pseudo R2=0.1040 Logistic model for BSE, goodness-of-fit test, Number of observations = 208 Number of groups =4 Hosmer- Lemeshow chi2(2) =3.40 Prob > chi2 =0.1828

Discussion

BSE is one of the most important screening modalities for early detection of breast tumors especially in resource-poor settings.10,25,26 Although it has not been shown to reduce breast cancer mortality, it is a part of general body awareness in which women are familiar with the appearance of their breasts so that any irregular changes could be recognized and reported early.18 Its importance cannot be overemphasized, especially when practiced adequately and effectively, in developing countries of Africa where there is limited access to preventive services. Female students of UOR seem to be well informed about breast cancer and BSE (96.74% and 79.44% respectively), a finding consistent with results from other studies in Africa.28 However surprisingly only a slight majority (55.71%) of them reported having performed BSE at least once, a frequent human irrational behavior.25 It is a worrying fact even because most of the interested female students are medical students therefore are assumed or expected to be not only better informed but also more aware about the value of BSE in the particular context of increasing breast cancer incidence.11 However comparable pictures have been documented by studies elsewhere worldwide.19,29‒31

This study shows no relationship between BSE practice and some potentially relevant factors: ethnicity, academic level, marital status, religion and family’s history of breast cancer. The absence of association between BSE practice and a family’s history of breast cancer is another interesting finding of our study consistent with several others worldwide.11,32‒34 Nonetheless, it is in odds with a comparable study from Ethiopia (19) another Sub Saharan country. In fact, one would expect from subjects having had the traumatic family’s experience of cancer (breast cancer!) to be more aware about all possible means of prevention (early detection!) including BSE practice. Another finding from this study is a strong association between BSE practice and basic knowledge about BSE, a result consistent with those of studies by other authors.35 The absence of relationship between BSE practice and a family’s history of breast cancer contrasts by all odds with its strong association with the fact that one had basic knowledge about BSE (OR=6.64; 95%CI: 2.82-15.62). It paradoxically seems that episodes of a so serious life-threatening disease are less impressive among that study population than simple information about BSE. Information biases can’t be completely discarded or ruled out.

Conclusion

Our study shows that despite that the majority of female students from that Congolese public college have basic knowledge about breast cancers and BSE this is not translated in the expected appropriate health behavior meaning BSE practice. Adequate strategies of sensitization should be identified and implemented in order to fix this serious health problem.

Acknowledgments

None.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare there are no conflicts of interest.

Funding

None.

References

  1. Doll R. Epidemiological evidence of the effects of behavior and the environment on the risk of human cancer. Recent Results Cancer Res. 1998;154:3‒21.
  2. Doll R, Peto R. The causes of cancer: quantitative estimates of avoidable risks of cancer in the United States today. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1981;66:1191.
  3. Mackay J, Jemal A, Lee NC. The Cancer Atlas. Atlanta: American Cancer Society; 2006.
  4. Rowan T Chlebowski, Susan L Hendrix, Robert D Langer, et al. Influence of estrogen plus progestin on breast cancer and mammography in healthy postmenopausal women: The Women’s Health Initiative Randomized Trial. JAMA. 2003;289:3243–3253.
  5. American Cancer Society. Cancer in Africa. International Agency for Research Cancer. 2008.
  6. Anon. Breast cancer. In: Longo, Fauci, Kasper, Hauser, Jameson and Localzo, editors. Harrison’s Principles of Internal Medicine. 18th ed. New York, USA: The McGraw-Hill Companies; 2012. p. 1816‒1837.
  7. World Health Organization. Latest World Cancer Statistics. France: International Agency for Research Cancer. 2013.
  8. Pamela Hallquist Viale. Guidelines on Screening for Breast Cancer: What’s New? J Adv Pract Oncol. 2015;6:508–510.
  9. Birhane K, Alemayehu M, Anawte B, et al. Practices of breast self-examination and associated factors among female Debre Behran University students. International Journal of Breast Cancer. 2017;8026297.
  10. Olaogun JG, Eyitayo EM, Dada SA, et al. The prevalence of practicing breast self-examination and knowledge of breast cancer disease among women attending secondary health facility. Int Surg J. 2017;4(10):3211‒3217.
  11. Agbonifoh JA. Breast Self-Examination Practice among Female Students of Tertiary Institutions. Journal of Education and Practice. 2016;7:12.
  12. GLOBOCAN. Estimated Cancer Incidence, Mortality and Prevalence Worldwide in 2012. 2012.
  13. Parkin DM, Nambooze S, Wabwire-Mangen F. Changing cancer incidence in Kampala, Uganda, 1991–2006. Int J Cancer. 2010;126(5):1187–1195.
  14. Uganda Breast Cancer Working Group. Breast cancer guidelines for Uganda. Afr Health Sci. 2003;3:46–50.
  15. Sylla BS, Wild CP. A million Africans a year dying from cancer by 2030: What can cancer research and control offer to the continent?. Int J Cancer. 2012;130(2):245–250.
  16. Mvila JL, Postema S, Marchal G, et al. From the set-up of a screening program of breast cancer patients to the identification of the first BRCA mutation in the DR Congo. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:759.
  17. Anderson BO. Guideline implementation for breast healthcare in low-income and middle- income countries: overview of the Breast Health Global initiative summit 2007. Cancer. 2007;113:2221‒2243.
  18. WHO. 2019.
  19. Getu MA, Kassaw MW, Tlaye KG, et al. Breast Cancer-Targets and Therapy. 2019;11:21–28.
  20. Ayed A, Eqtait FA. Breast self-examination in terms of knowledge, attitude and practice among nursing students of Arab American university/Jenin. Journal of Education and Practice. 2015;6:4.
  21. Somkin CP. Improving the effectiveness of breast self-examination in the early detection of breast cancer. A selective review of literature. Nurse Practitioner Forum.1993;4(2):76‒84.
  22. Burke KM, LeMone P, Mohn Brown EL. Medical-Surgical Nursing Care. 2nd ed. Prentice Hall: Pearson; 2007.
  23. Millar MG, Millar KU. Feelings and beliefs about breast cancer and breast self- examination among women in three age groups. Family and Community Health. 1992; 15(3):30–37.
  24. American Cancer Society. Breast cancer overview. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society. American Cancer Society. Cancer statistics. CA: Am Cancer J Clin. 2002;52:10‒11.
  25. Sama CB, Dzekem B, Kehbila J, et al. Awareness of breast cancer and breast self-examination among female undergraduate students in a higher teachers training college in Cameroon. Pan African Medical Journal. 2017;28:91.
  26. Azemfac K, Christie SA, Carvalho MM, et al. A community-based assessment of knowledge and practice of breast self-examination and prevalence of breast disease in Southwest Cameroon. Journal of Cancer Epidemiology. 2019.
  27. www.stata.com
  28. Bassey R, Irurhe N, Olowoyeye M, et al. Knowledge, attitude and practice of breast self-examination among nursing students in Lagos University Teaching Hospital, Nigeria. Educational Research. 2011;2(6):1232‒1236.
  29. Gwarzo U, Sabitu K, Idris S. Knowledge and practice of breast self-examination among female undergraduate students of Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria. Annal of African Medicine. 2009;8(1):55‒58.
  30. Agboola AO, Deji-Agboola AM, Oritogun, KS, et al. Knowledge, attitude and practice of breast self-examination in female health workers in Olabisi Onabunjo University Teaching Hospital, Sagamu. Medical Journal. 2009;8(1):9.
  31. Ayesha A, Zahid I, Zoya FRL, et al. Breast self‑examination awareness and practices in young women in developing countries: A survey of female students in Karachi, Pakistan. Journal of Education and Health Promotion. 2018;7:8.
  32. Fidelis MC, Manalo MD. Breast self-examination (BSE) practice among female patients in an outpatient clinic in the Philippines. 2013.
  33. Parsa P, Kandiah M, Parsa N. Factors associated with breast self-examination among Malaysian women teachers. Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal. 2011;17(6):509‒16.
  34. Secginli S, Nahcivan NO. Factors associated with breast cancer screening behaviours in a sample of Turkish women: a questionnaire survey. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2006;43:161‒171.
  35. Ashing-Giwa N. The recruitment of breast cancer survivors into cancer control studies: A focus on African American women. Journal of National Medical Association. 1999;91:255‒260.
Creative Commons Attribution License

©2020 Mastaki, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.