Research Article Volume 11 Issue 2
^{1}University of Carthage, Higher Institute of Fisheries and Aquaculture of Bizerte, Tunisia
^{2}Technical Center of Aquaculture, Tunisia
^{3}Directorate General of Fisheries and Aquaculture, Tunisia
Correspondence: Sami Mili University of Carthage, Higher Institute of Fisheries and Aquaculture of Bizerte, Tunisia
Received: November 30, 2021  Published: August 5, 2022
Citation: Mili S, Ennouri R, Fatnassi M, et al. Variability of Biological Features of a Mugilidae Chelon Ramada in Two Tunisian Reservoirs. J Aqauc Mar Biol. 2022;11(2):4148. DOI: 10.15406/jamb.2022.11.00335
Mullet is the most massively harvested species, representing the third of the total freshwater fish landing in Tunisia. To ensure freshwater fish farming durability and development in the country, reservoirs have been stocked with Mugilidae fry which was collected from coastal and estuaries areas after a short adaptation period. The objective of this paper is to compare and contrast Chelon ramada’’s age, growth, and mortality in two Tunisian freshwater reservoirs (Seliana and Kasseb). The sample species were caught with a multimesh gillnets and were classified into five age groups. The study of the age and growth demonstrated variability between Chelon ramada species’ features. The optimal size of the captured mullet (Lopt) was equal to 37.62 cm for M=0.48, L∞=57.05 and K=0.31 in Siliana Reservoir. Whereas, it measured 31.42cm in Kasseb Reservoir, for M=0.795, L∞=48.15 and K=0.31. It has also been found that the fishing mortality rate is very high at Siliana Reservoir when compared to Kasseb Reservoir. This work is a contribution to the identification of the biological features of Chelon ramada that lives in Siliana and Kasseb Reservoirs. It seeks to ensure a rational and sustainable exploitation of fishery resources in these Tunisian freshwater reservoirs and it recommends the development and preservation of mullet fisheries.
Keywords: Chelon ramada, age, growth, mortality, fishery management, Seliana reservoir, Kasseb reservoir, Tunisia
ISPAB, higher Institute of fisheries and aquaculture of Bizerte; TCA, technical centre of aquaculture; IRESA, institution of agricultural Research and higher education; Lopt, optimal capture size; F, fishing mortality; M, natural mortality; Z, total mortality; R, the scale radius (mm); a, the intercept; b, the slope; L∞: asymptotic length that the fish can reach; K, growth rate constant; t, age of the fish; t0, theoretical age of the fish when its length is zero; Φ', growth performance index; N(t), number of survivors at time t; N0, number of individuals at time 0; Z: constant; L∞: asymptotic length; L': length "cutoff length"; L mean: mean length; T, mean annual temperature; Lt, total length; Lst, standard length; Lf, fork length; Wt, total weight; Lr, the recruitment size; VPA, The Virtual Population Analysis
Man has been exploiting both inland and marine fish resources for years on end. These fisheries provide a major source of food for a lot of people and allow many others to earn a living. However, the strong pressure exerted on the marine environment, leading to the overexploitation of fish stocks and sometimes their depletion, is the main cause of the recent downward trend in world production.^{1,2}
Over the years, and following the socioeconomic scientific and technological development, Man has found other breeding and fishing forms of aquatic species. This activity can now be conducted in marine, fresh or geothermal waters alike, and even in environments that are not in contact with the sea, which created the concept of inland fish farming. In fact, the reservoirs which were initially built to respond to a need for water supply and irrigation, and then to the production of electricity, are now deployed for fish farming.
The first Tunisian experience of freshwater fish farming in reservoirs was initiated in the 1960s by the National Fisheries Office. This began with the experimental stocking of reservoirs with mullet captured from natural sites and acclimatized in Reservoirs.^{35} Actually, the Technical Center of Aquaculture (TCA) ensures the seeding of 9 million mullet fries per year in 25 large Tunisian reservoirs in order to contribute to the sustainability of Mugilidae stocks.^{6}
The family Mugilidae is very common in Tunisia and it encompasses six species: the bighead mullet (Mugil cephalus), the pig mullet (Chelon ramada), the golden mullet (Chelon aurata), the jumping mullet (Chelon saliens), the lippu mullet (Chelon labrosus) and the labéon mullet (Oedalichulis labeo).^{7 }The most commonly exploited ones are M. cephalus and C. ramada. Pig mullet has been identified as a potential species for aquaculture diversification in the Mediterranean region, as well as in other parts of the world.^{811} This type of Mugilidae has great tolerance to variations in salinity and temperature (euryhaline and eurythermal), strong forbearance to captivity, fast growth, omnivorous feeding habits, and high market price.^{12}
The aim of this study is to compare the variability in age, growth and mortality parameters estimated for Chelon ramada sampled from Siliana and Kasseb Reservoirs between April 2015 and May 2016. This comparison allowed to identify the site with optimal conditions for mugilids growth, which would eventually enhance the management of these resources. Due to lack of information related to this filed, this comparison was conducted using literature resources in combination with the studied parameters. The results of this study can serve in the development of a management plan and stock assessment.
Study areas: This study was conducted in two Tunisian reservoirs: Kasseb and Seliana (Figure 1). The selected reservoirs are both located in the northern part of the country, with different surface areas and bathymetries.
Figure 1 The map of Tunisia indicating the location of the two studied reservoirs: Kasseb and Seliana.
Kasseb Reservoir (36°45’32” N, 9°0’20” E) was built in 1968. It is situated at 20Km kilometers from the town of Beja, and it belongs to the north hydrological watershed of Madjerda. It covers an area of 430ha and contains 70Mm^{3}of water. It is mainly used as a drinking water supply by the city of Tunis at a rate of 40Mm^{3}/year.^{13}
Seliana Reservoir (36°09’26’’N, 9°20’55’’E) was built in 1978 and it has a surface area of 600ha. It is located near the City of Seliana and it belongs to the south hydrological watershed of Medjerda. Seliana Reservoir is used for irrigation at the perimeter of Gaafour/Laaroussia City with 23Mm^{3}/year.^{13}
For fish sampling in these reservoirs, a multimesh gillnet was deployed as per the methods recommended in the European Program prEN 14575 (CEN 2005). Sampling operations were carried out with a seasonal frequency between 2015 and 2016 (Table 1). A total of 530 fishes were captured: 320 individuals from Siliana Reservoir and 210 from Kasseb Reservoir.
Siliana Reservoir 
1718/05/2015 
78/09/2015 
12/12/2015 
0104/03/2016 
Kasseb Reservoir 
1819/05/2015 
78/09/2015 
12/12/2015 
0209/03/2016 
Table 1 Sampling periods in Siliana and Kasseb Reservoirs
A study of the growth of C. ramada in Kasseb and Seliana Reservoirs was conducted to find out which reservoir presents the best growth rates. The growth model of Von Bertalanffy was adopted using the agelength key. The ages of C. ramada were determined from scales measurements. The analyses of these parameters were carried out by means of the software "FISAT II".^{14} Estimation of fishing (M), natural (M) and total (Z) mortality related to body size and to the number of cohorts of the mullet populations in Seliana and Kasseb Reservoirs were made using FISAT II routines.
Age estimation
In this study, we used scale aging. The scales in the area between the dorsal fin and the head were carefully collected and kept in welllabeled pockets to be used later for age reading. The superimposition of several rings induces the formation of a dark zone which informs either about stunting or a slowdown of the growth. This state can be caused by a physiological condition such as reproduction, the variation of the physicochemical parameters of the environment (winter period), or food availability.
Approximate Age
The age valuation is done by reference to the number of the formed circuli. Several cases can be presented:
Group 0: Scale with 0 circulus
Group I: Scale with a circulus very close to the edge
Group I+: Scale with one circulus very far from the edge
Group II: Scale with two circuli where the second one is very close to the edge
Group II+ and III, III+...
The measurements of the radii of the different circuli in the scale were made with an ocular micrometer (Figure 2).
Growth study
The study of growth is a very delicate approach in fisheries. Therefore, to ensure the success of this process, it was crucial to find the most appropriate method that best fits the basic data (sizeage pairs) and to choose the most relevant model describing the relationship between these two variables.^{15}
Fish length  scale radius relationship
The fish lengthscale radius relationship is established according to the following linear regression model:
$TL\text{}=\text{}a\text{}*\text{}R\text{}+\text{}b$
With: R: scale radius (mm); TL: total fish length (cm); a: intercept; b: slope.
Absolute growth
Among the most commonly used growth models is that of Von Bertalanffy (1938) with the following mathematical expression:
$L{T}_{t}=L{T}_{\infty}[1{e}^{k(t{t}_{o})}]$
With: Lt: length of the fish at time t; L∞: asymptotic length that the fish can reach; K: growth rate constant; t: age of the fish; t0: theoretical age of the fish when its length is zero.
The estimation of the parameters of the Von Bertalanffy equation (L∞ and k) remains easy based on the size frequency distribution, and through the use of different methods integrated in FISAT II software. Only those values that have an adequate growth performance index (Φ') are retained^{16} with:
$\Phi \text{'}\text{}=\text{}log10\left(K\right)\text{}+\text{}2log10\left(L\infty \right)$
Elefan I Method: this routine allows the estimation of L∞ and K by a direct projection of frequencysize data without translating the length scale into the age scale.^{14} In addition, this method allows the identification of the growth curve.
Shepherd's Method: this method is very similar to the Elefan method except that the values of WP and C are considered zero.
PowellWetherall Method: this method estimates L∞ and Z/K from a sample representing the population.^{1719}
Sizeage data analysis: this method estimates growth parameters from the lengthage relationship, and plots the growth curve.^{2023}
Relative linear growth
The different relationships between lengths are established by linear regression based on the least squares method. The relationships were expressed as a function of the form Y=aX^{b}, which is transformed into a logarithmic function of the form Y=Log (a) + bLog (X). This transformation is the simplest method to linearize the relationship, stabilize the variances and normalize the variables.^{24}
After growth curve plotting, the value of a (intercept) and b (slope or allometry coefficient) are determined. Moreover: if b = 1, isometry or isometric allometry; if b < 1, negative allometry; if b > 1, positive allometry.
It should be noted that the values of a and b vary according to the species and the sex. They are also dissimilar in different regions.
Relative weight growth
The relationship between the size and weight of fish is defined according to Le Cren^{25 }by the following equation:
W = a L^{b}
With: W: the weight of the fish (Wt or We) in grams; L: the length of the fish (Lt, Lf or Lst) in centimeters; a: constant corresponding to the weight of an individual of length equal to unity; b: allometry coefficient.
Three cases can occur^{24}: if b=b theoretical, an isometry between the two characters; if b<b theoretical, there is a negative allometry; if b > b theoretical, the allometry is positive.
Absolute weight growth
The equation that describes absolute weight growth is obtained by combining parameters from the length growth equation and the lengthweight relationship.
$Wt\text{}=\text{}W\infty \text{}{\left(1\text{}\text{}{\u0435}^{k}{}^{(t\text{}\text{}t\text{}0)}\right)}^{b}$
With: Wt: weight of the fish at age t; W∞ = a (L∞) b: theoretical asymptotic weight corresponding to L∞; k: growth coefficient; t: age of the fish; t0: the theoretical age of the fish when the length of the fish is zero; b: the allometry coefficient of the length weight relationship.
Mortality
The study of mortality focuses essentially on the estimation of fishing mortality (F), natural mortality (M) and total mortality (Z = M + F). This parameter is considered very important for stock assessment. In general, the evolution of survival fish can be described by a negative exponential function with the following mathematical formula:
$N\text{}\left(t\right)\text{}=\text{}N0\text{}{e}^{Zt}$
With: N(t): number of survivors at time t; N0: number of individuals at time 0; and Z: constant.
In this work, we estimated the parameters M, F and Z using different routines of the Software FISAT II. This application requires, as input, the growth parameters (L∞ and K).
Total mortality (Z)
The total mortality rate can be considered as the sum of the fishing and natural mortality rates. It varies according to size class and to the number of cohorts in a population. This rate is influenced by growth the parameters and water temperature in the study area. Z can be determined by different methods such as:
Jones/van Zalinge curve.^{26,27}
It is possible to estimate the total mortality Z by referring to this curve which is incorporated in FISAT II. It allows the comparisons between the results obtained. Z can be determined from the average lengths using FISAT routines.
Beverton and Holt Model.^{28}
This model is applied primarily to longlived, slowgrowing fish. For these species, the value of total mortality is estimated by deploying the following mathematical formula:
$Z\text{}=\text{}K\text{}*\text{}\left(L\infty L\text{}mean\right)/\left(L\text{}meanL\text{'}\right)$
With: K: growth rate; L∞: asymptotic length; L': length "cutoff length"; L mean: mean length.
Method of Ault and Ehrhardt.^{29,30}
Unlike the previous method, this model is applied to shortliving species. The parameters needed for the calculation of Z are L∞, K, "cutoff length" (L'), mean length (L mean) and maximum length (L max).
With:
$\left(L\infty L\text{}max/L\infty L\text{'}\right)Z/K\text{}=\text{}\left[Z\left(L\text{'}L\text{}mean\right)\text{}+K\left(L\infty L\text{}mean\right)\right]/\left[Z\left(L\text{}maxL\text{}mean\right)+K\left(L\infty L\text{}mean\right)\right]$Hoenig's model.^{31}
This method is used when the maximum age of the fish is identified during the sampling operations. The following formula is used to estimate Z.
$Ln\text{}\left(Z\right)\text{}=\text{}1.44\text{}\text{}0.984\text{}Ln\text{}\left(tmax\right)$
Natural mortality (M)
Natural mortality is an important index in stock assessment models. This index describes the number of individuals that die due to disease, predation, aging or fluctuations in ecological parameters. The estimation of M can be made using two methods:
Rikhter and Efanovs Method
This method is based on the knowledge of t mass which is defined as the age in years of mass maturity of fish. The mathematical formula used to estimate M is:
$M\text{}=\text{}\left(1.52\text{}/\text{}t\text{}\left(mass\right)\text{}0.72\right)\text{}\text{}0.16$
Pauly's Method
The formula that describes this method is the following:
$log\text{}M\text{}=\text{}0.0066\text{}\text{}0.279log\text{}(L\infty )+\text{}0.6543\text{}log\text{}\left(k\right)\text{}+\text{}0.4634\text{}log\text{}\left(T\right)$
With: L∞: asymptotic length that the fish can reach it; K: growth rate; T: mean annual temperature.
Fishing mortality (F)
This parameter remains interesting for the evaluation of stocks, since it gives accurate information on the level of exploitation of the fishing populations. F is estimated by a routine in FISAT II. This is based on the catchatlength curve. This method allows the estimation of F, E (= F/Z) and M, following the introduction of the mean annual temperature of the habitat (in °C) and the probability of capture for each length group of fish in the input data needed to run the model.
Population dynamics of the mullet Chelon ramada
Size structure: The size range of the captured mullet is varied between the two studied reservoirs (p<0.05). Sizes ranged from 18.5 to 46 cm in Siliana Reservoir and from 19.6 to 43 cm in Kasseb Reservoir (Figure 2 & 3). The population sampled during the spring season is made up exclusively of immature specimens. The average length of the captured specimen’s ranges is around 29.42 cm in Siliana. In Kasseb, mullets show a more important annual development with an average length about 31.25 cm. This variability may be due to environmental conditions favorable to mullet growth or to less fishing pressure at Kasseb Reservoir.
Estimation of growth parameters
Fish growth is influenced by biotic and abiotic factors. Abiotic parameters refer to extrinsic factors such as dissolved oxygen and water temperature that act directly on the physiology and growth of the fish fauna and on its reproduction.^{32} In order to evaluate the differences in growth rates between mullet from the two reservoirs, we determined the growth parameters of this species using several methods (Table 2).
Estimation Method

Siliana Reservoir 
Kasseb Reservoir 

L∞ 
K 
Φ’ 
L∞ 
K 
Φ’ 

ELEFAN 
57.05 
0.31 
3.061 
48.65 
0.46 
3.037 
SHEPHERD 
50 
0.46 
3.061 
48.60 
0.46 
3.036 
POWELL 
46.75 
0.46 
3.002 
48 
0.46 
3.025 
Von Bertallanfy Equation 
Lt = 57.05(1e^{0.31(t+0.048)}) Wt = 708.24(1e^{0.31(t+0.048)})^{2.880} 
Lt = 48.65(1e^{0.46(t0.02)}) Wt = 874.49(1e^{0.46(t0.02)})^{2.675} 
Table 2 Estimation of growth parameters for C. ramada in Siliana and Kasseb Reservoir
L∞, asymptotic length; K, growth coefficient; Φ’, growth performance index; Lt, length of the fish at age t, Wt: weight of the fish at age t.
In this study, the age classes of the individuals caught vary from 0+ to 3+. The number of specimens of C. ramada caught during the sampling operations shows great age variability (p<0.05).
Comparison of growth parameters between mullets from the two Reservoirs affirms that C. ramada from Siliana has a higher asymptotic length compared to Kasseb. This length is very close to the maximum size caught. However, the asymptotic weight, the fish attains, is more important at Kasseb. The comparison of the Von Bertallanfy growth parameters estimated for C. ramada in Siliana and Kasseb with other studies conducted in other areas are presented in table 3. These results show that L∞, K and T0 obtained are comparable to those found by other authors.
L∞ 
K 
T_{0} 
Total 
Equation 
Study area 
Reference 
57.05 
0.31 
0.048 
143 
Lt=57.05(1e^{0.31(t0.048)}) 
Siliana Reservoir 
The current study 
48.65 
0.46 
0.02 
14 
Lt=48.65(1e^{0.46(t0.02)}) 
Kasseb Reservoir 
The current study 
58.05 
0.25 
0.005 
65 
Lt=58.05(1e^{0.25(t0.005)}) 
Sidi el Barrak Reservoir 
Mili et al.,^{3} 
53 
0.21 
0.18 
166 
Lt=53(1e^{0.21(t+0.18)}) 
Ichkeul Lake 
Kraim et al.,^{33} 
54.6 
0.22 
0.07 
74 
Lt= 54.6(1e^{0.22(t+0.07)}) 
Edku Lake (Egypte) 
Kraim et al.,^{33} 
50.7 
0.20 
0.31 
53 
Lt=50.7(1e^{0.20(t+0.31)}) 
Merja Zargua (Maroc) 
Kraim et al.,^{33} 
48.9 
0.21 
1.01 
120 
Lt=48.9(1e^{0.21(t+1.01)}) 
Gökova Bay (Turquie) 
Kasimoglu et al.,^{34} 
59.96 
0.26 
0.45 
362 
Lt=59.96(1e^{0.26(t+0.45)}) 
Neretva delta River (Croatia) 
Glamuzina et al.,^{35} 
53.44 
0.12 
1.5 
419 
Lt=53.44(1e^{0.12(t+1.5)}) 
Tagus River (Portugal) 
Almeida et al.,^{36} 
Table 3 Comparison of estimated growth parameters for Chelon ramada
L∞, asymptotic length; K, growth rate; T0, theoretical age of the fish when its length is zero; Lt, length of the fish at time t.
The growth rate of mullet in the studied reservoirs is slightly higher compared to other regions. This difference may be explained by variability in biotic and abiotic factors between these environments. Mili et al.^{3} have found that the maximum age for L. ramada is 10 years corresponding to a total length ranging from 52.9 cm to 58.0 cm. These authors reported that C. ramada reached an asymptotic size of 58.5 cm, 57 cm and 48.6 cm respectively in Sidi El Barrak, Seliana and Kasseb Reservoirs.^{1} Losse et al.^{37} revealed that only M. cephalus and L. ramada are present in the reservoirs of Sidi Salem and Bir Mcherga. Furthermore, these authors demonstrated that the maximum age recorded for L. ramada is 8 years.
The differences observed in growth rate of mullet in the Tunisian reservoirs are probably due to the effect of temperature, salinity, quantity of food available, population density, fishing season and ripening stage in freshwaters.^{3} Numerous studies carried out in different regions reported that the growth variability observed in Mugilidae may be due to different environmental conditions and to migration, which favors mixing between migrant and local populations.^{38,7,12} However, differences in growth rate according to the genetic origin of stocks are not excluded.^{12}
Biometric relationships
The biometric study was conducted to determine the following morphometric relationships: total lengthstandard length (TLST), total lengthfork length (TLFL) and total lengthtotal weight (TLTW). All the equations of the biometric relations are summarized in the following table (Table 4).
Reservoir 
Equation 
a 
b 
R^{2} 
T 
P 
Allometry 
Siliana 
TL = 0.6688SL+4.883 
0.668 
4.883 
0.713 
6.84 
S 
+ 
TL=0.8855 FL+0.9674 
0.885 
0.967 
0.813 
12.47 
S 
 

TW =0.3524 TL^{2.8808} 
0.352 
2.880 
0.719 
5.39 
S 
 

Kasseb 
TL= 0.7909SL+1.6999 
0.790 
1.699 
0.997 
6.24 
S 
+ 
TL= 0.8606 FL+1.7587 
0.860 
1.758 
0.996 
8.62 
S 
+ 

TW=0.0267TL^{2.6769} 
0.026 
2.676 
0.994 
11.24 
S 
 
Table 4 Comparison of the biometric relations in C. ramada in Siliana and Kasseb Reservoir
A, intercept ; b, allometry coefficient; R^{2}, coefficient of determination; TL, total length; FL, fork length; TW, total weight; SL, standard length ; T, student ttest; P, pvalue of ttest ; S, significance.
The relationship between total length and standard length shows allometry coefficients greater than 1 for mullets from Siliana and Kasseb (t = 3.61, P < 0.05), which allows to affirm the presence of a positive allometry between these parameters. The relationship linking the total length to the fork length displays a negative allometry for the mullets from Siliana, while it is positive in Kasseb. The coefficients of determination reveal the existence of a strong link between the different lengths for mullets in these reservoirs. The relationship between total length and total weight shows a negative allometry for Mullet in both reservoirs, reflecting a faster growth in the cube of length compared to weight. The b value was significantly lower than the theoretical value of 3 in Siliana (t = 5.28, P < 0.05) and Kasseb reservoir (t = 3.33, P < 0.05).
Estimation of recruitment
In order to estimate the maximum recruitment rate for C. ramada in the studied reservoirs, we analyzed the histograms of recruitment versus time (Figure 4 and 5). The obtained figures demonstrated that the maximum level of mullet recruitment is reached within the 5^{th} subgroup in May. During this period, 27.15% and 10.79% of the population were new recruits respectively in Siliana and Kasseb. The second group presented a maximum rate of recruits within the 4^{th} subgroup in September, for the mullets in Siliana and for the 5^{th} subgroup in October, for the mullets in Kasseb. Moreover, we noted a very low recruitment rate at Siliana when compared to Kasseb with respective percentages of about 1.80% and 15.89%.
The optimal size of mullet capture (Lopt) is equal to 37.62 cm for M = 0.48, L∞ = 57.05 and K = 0.31 at Siliana. Lopt is about 31.42 cm in Kasseb for M = 0.795, L∞ = 48.15 and K = 0.31.
The minimum size observed is approximately 18 cm and 19.6 cm respectively in Siliana and Kasseb. These sizes appear to be consistent with the recruitment size ‘Lr’. This observation can be explained by the optimal state of exploitation of these resources or by the absence of mullet reproduction in freshwater reservoirs.
Mortality
The Virtual Population Analysis (VPA), integrating all the parameters of the dynamics; such as asymptotic length, growth rate, fishing and natural mortality rates, as well as the values of ‘a’ and ‘b’ of the lenghtweight relationship, allowed us to elucidate the level of exploitation and the state of the mullet populations in the two reservoirs.
The following graphical illustrations are used to determine F and M for each size and age class. The fish captured during the sampling operations represent only 2 to 10% of the total existing population. Mullet stocks are dominated by specimens with sizes between 18cm and 28 cm in Siliana and between 19cm and 30 cm in Kasseb Reservoir (Figure 6, and 7). The results obtained show that the number of survivors is high compared to the number of fish affected by fishing mortality in both reservoirs.
At Siliana Reservoir, fishing mortality (F) is higher in the larger size classes. Fish between 2832 cm and 38 cm have respective fishing mortality rates of 4.5 and 3. Individuals aged 4.6 and 5 years are the most affected by F, which indicates that adult specimens are the most vulnerable to fishing gear and the most targeted.
Natural mortality (M) affects individuals with a size between 18 and 24 cm (1 or 2 years old). In fact, these species are very sensitive to the physicochemical parameters of the water, which explains the high natural mortality rate.
At Kasseb Reservoir, fishing mortality affects mainly fish with length varying between 22 and 39 cm (age between1.7 and 3 years). Natural mortality affects the young individuals of the mullet population (1year old).
Gophen and Snovsky’s^{39} study showed that the calculated factor of natural mortality, with respect to growth rate and landing statistics, gives a similar survival rate: 27 % of stocked fingerlings recruited into the “catchments categories” for C. ramada.
Exploitation level estimation
Analyses of the stocks of mullet in the two reservoirs led to the identification of the exploitation level of these resources (Figure 8 and 9). The figures above show that the relative biomass curve B'/R gradually decreases with the increase of the mullet exploitation level. The current yield per recruit Y'/R is about 0.0375 in Kasseb and 0.0498 at Siliana. The relative biomass per recruit B'/R in Siliana is around 0.249 per unit of effort, while it is around 0.376 in Kasseb. The predictive value Emax, which corresponds to an operation with maximum efficiency, is estimated at 0.73 in Siliana and 0.54 in Kasseb.
Freshwater fish is the most exploited halieutic resource with an impact on the economy as well as the environment and species’ biodiversity. However, the identification of biological parameters, such as growth, reproduction and mortality of these fish species are limited due to the scarcity of scientific research conducted in Tunisian reservoirs.
The comparison of growth parameters estimated by the Von Bertallanfy Model for Chelon ramada in two reservoirs shows a linear growth and weight gain in favor of the specimens collected from Siliana compared to those taken from Kasseb. However, the cessation of the fry stocking operations in Kasseb will ultimately have bad economic consequences on the fishermen's incomes and on the ecosystem.
The present work has shown that the ecobiological conditions are favorable for the growth of Chelon ramada in Siliana Reservoir compared to other freshwater reservoirs in Tunisia.^{3,40} Besides, the fishing mortality rate is higher in Siliana compared to Kasseb Reservoir.
The lack of reliable fisheries statistics can be considered as a major handicap which hinders the development of freshwater fish farming in Tunisia. The reported statistics for freshwater fish, particularly for mullet, and the confusion and uncertainty over species are criticized by both professionals and scientists. In fact, the reliability of the studies based on these data.^{41} is limited. Additionally, in Tunisian reservoirs, the data which have been acquired with regard to fish distribution patterns.^{41} remain insufficient. This information is necessary, to improve our understanding of the stocks and reform fisheries management.^{42}
The good growth rate of mullet species entails that these resources have a significant production potential. Development of mullet fishery should therefore be supported, especially because the juveniles have a good growth rate.^{3} Moreover, after reservoirs are stocked with mullet fry, whether from hatcheries or natural sites, their exploitation should be encouraged.
This work is part of a collaborative project involving the Technical Centre of Aquaculture, the Higher Institute of Fisheries and Aquaculture, Bizerte, and the General Directorate of Fisheries and Aquaculture, Tunisia. We are most thankful for the Institution of Agricultural Research and Higher Education (IRESA) that has provided financial support for the research project (AMBISEPT) which in turn led to the realization of this research. We also would like to thank TCA technical staff and students from ISPA Bizerte for their efforts in the practical part of this work.
Authors declares there are no conflicts of interests.
©2022 Mili, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work noncommercially.