The technology of collection of Patinopecten yessoensis larvae on mesh collectors, designed in Japan, requires transplantation of juveniles into cages. However, this transplantation is labor-intensive and dangerous to the species being cultivated. In cultivation ofthe oyster Crassostrea gigas, a lot of time is spent to increase the distance between scallop valves after larval settlement on them and to remove excess juveniles from them. at the same time, the use of the realized niche, instead of the fundamental one, in selecting the area and the depth to install the collectors and improving their design, provides an opportunity to grow these bivalves without transplanting them to other constructions. This not only facilitates the cultivation process, but also increases the growth rate and the survival rate of the species cultivated, because being exposed to air and various technological operations pose a strong stress to it.

Keywords: Transplantation of juveniles, Cultivation, Patinopecten (=Mizuhopecten) yessoensis, Crassostrea gigas

The technology for cultivation of the scallop Patinopecten yessoensis, originally borrowed from Japan, has a labor-intensive operation: replanting of the youngs from collectors to cages in autumn.¹ In cultivation of the Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas, a labor-intensive operation is distance increase between shells after settlement of larvae and scraping off excess juveniles from a shell collector.² Depending on productivity of year, from 30 to 50% of juvenile scallops are lost during replanting of the youngs,^3,4 as many scallops experience stress that results in a slowdown of their growth and formation of “rings of interference” on the shell caused by the air exposure. The labor intensiveness of these technologies makes them unprofitable in Russia,⁵ in many countries of Europe, cultivation of scallop is considered unlucrative too.⁶ The studies aimed at finding the ways to optimize the growing process^7-14 and reduce operations of scallop transplantation¹⁵ have been conducted for a long time.

Scallops that have reached one year of age in collectors or cages are often reseeded to the bottom, where they become exposed to many negative factors contributing to their low survival. Our experiments for the study of realized niche in scallop and the tests of the new design of the collectors set up on the bottom allow us to improve the borrowed technologies and avoid transplantations. The goal of this publication is to elucidate the results of cultivation two species of commercial bivalves to commercial size without transplantation by creation of optimum number of young’s on collectors.

To achieve this goal, I determined first the time for immersing in the sea the collectors in order to create the optimum number of young scallops. The determination began with the study of dynamics of the gonadal index in spawners. Every ten days, starting from the middle of May to late June, 1977-1990, a total of 25-30 scallops were collected by divers in Posyet Bay (42°30’N, 130°55’E) (Figure 1). Total weight, weight of soft tissues, muscle, and gonads of the scallops were measured with an accuracy of ± 0.02 g. A similar work was carried out in 1985-1987 in Kit Bay (43°3’39’’N, 134°12’12’’E). The gonadal index of scallops was estimated by the method of Ito and co-authors.¹⁶ The time of the onset of spawning in bivalves was determined as an abrupt decrease, by 9-12%, in the gonadal index. A week after spawning in 1977-1999,, plankton samples were collected with an Apstein net every two to three days from the horizon 0-10 m at one or three stations in Minonosok Bay (42°36’32’’N, 130°51’48’’E), during four years at five stations in Kit Bay, and during two years at four stations in Vladimir Bay (43°54’N, 135°30’E). In 1985, in Kit Bay, at the deepest station, plankton samples were taken from 20 and 10 m. The mesh size of the mill screen was 100 μm. Plankton samples were fixed with 4% formaldehyde. Larvae were counted and measured in Bogorov’s chamber under a MBS-10 microscope; number of larvae was expressed per 1m³.

 After the scallop larvae reached 250 μm, the collector-cages, designed by Gabaev DD,¹⁷ were placed in Minonosok bay, in road Pallada bay (42°35 ’ 55 "N, 130°50 ’ 45" E), in Kit bay and in Vladimir Bay. For comparison in Minonosok bay, in Northern bay (42°56 ’ 37 "N, 131°23 ’ 11" E) and in Alekseeva bay (42°59 ’ 6 "N, 131°43 ’ 26" E) in the sea were placed collectors of the Japanese design.¹⁸ Besides, in 1989 in Vladimir Bay, and in 1990 in road Pallada bay were placed the thinned collector-cages at which the distance between conus has been increased twice. To determine the optimum horizon for positioning the collectors and the dynamics of larvae settlement on the substrate, collectors of the Japanese design were placed on the bottom at 16 stations within the horizon 0-19 m, at different times, starting from the autumn of the previous year, in 1977-1982. The method of obtaining materials to determine the required mesh size of shell, the optimum angle of the collector wall relative to the water flow direction, as well as forecasting and increase in the number of larvae in case of a lean year was described earlier.¹⁹ Four months later and in the spring of the following year, the collectors were lifted to the surface, cleaned of fouling organisms, live and dead bivalves were counted, and the abundance of the main predator, the sea star Asterias amurensis, was determined. In 1980-1987, we carried out a mass counting of juvenile P. yessoensis, which settled on the Japanese collectors deployed at different times in a commercial farm in Minonosok Bay. For the study, we took into account the contents of three collector bags taken from three places of every fifth of the one-hundred-meter lines.

Juvenile scallops, removed from the collectors, were reseeded into cages and onto the bottom. Yearling scallops were transplanted from the collector cages onto the bottom also. A part of the collector cages were left underwater for the second and third years. To determine the rate of scallops’ survival on the bottom, live and dead individuals were caught using diving equipment or a dredge coupled with an aquaplane. At least 100 specimens of each species were measured with a Vernier caliper to an accuracy of ± 0.1 mm; in 25-30 specimens, the weight increment was analyzed by means of electronic scales VLTK-500. The final production was determined as the total biomass of the species on the facility. A major part of the works on scallop cultivation was conducted in Posyet Bay in 1977-1996, in Kit Bay in 1985-1988, and in Vladimir Bay in 1988-1989 and 1999.

 In 1977 and 1982, a total of 118 pyramids made of stainless rods with a cross section of 8 mm were installed on the bottom of Minonosok Bay before settling of oyster C. gigas larvae. Grown up oysters were measured with Vernier calipers and weighed. All oysters that settled in four pyramids in 1977 were subjected to a complete biological analysis. Their number ranged from 11 to 253. In the summer of 1979, six bunch of oyster collectors, the main substratum of which were polyethylene rings with a furrow on their flat part,²⁰ were suspended on a raft in Novgorodskaya Bay (42°38’37’’N, 130°52’17’’E) (Figure 1). The rings had different colors, were fixed at different distances from one another, as well as had or lacked the overall netted cover. For the control, a garland of oyster collectors from shell of P. yessoensis was also placed there. In August 1982, all the collectors were hauled to the surface and processed according to the standard procedure. The obtained data were analyzed statistically using a program STATISTICA 6.0²¹ and tested at the level α=0.05.

Figure 1 Index map of the water area used for experimental cultivation of Patinopecten yessoensis or Crassostrea gigas. 1: Minonosok Bay, 2: Posyet Bay, 3: Novgorodskaya Bay, 4: Northern bay, 5: Alekseeva bay, 6: Kit Bay, 7: Vladimir Bay.

A collector - cage, designed in 1981 for collecting and breed the scallop Patinopecten yessoensis, has the interior partitioned into cones with planes (Figure 2) that protect bivalves from falling down and creating a high density there.¹⁷ This reduces the competition between bivalves and increases their survival and growth rate in comparison with those in collectors of the Japanese design (Table 1). In case an cover with a mesh size of 10 mm is used, the collector - cages can be left in the sea for a year without any damage to scallop and accompanying species (Figure 3). Providing these collector - cages with an cover with a mesh size of 15 mm allows growing scallop in them to a marketable size without transplantations (Table 2).

Figure 2 Conus from collector-cage with juvenile of molluscs.

Figure 3 C. gigas has grown without intervention on metal rods to commercial size.

Even more promising is cultivation of P. yessoensis in collector - cages enveloped with an overall cover. The presence of an overall cover on the construction installed on the bottom stimulates use a machine that hauls it from the water, removes all fouling organisms, puts on a new cover, and immerses it again into the sea.²² Mechanization of the entire cultivation process will significantly reduce the cost of the output product and make it profitable in many countries.

Associated species and predators have a significant impact on the cultivated object and on the sea farms.^{23- 25} However, our technology is facilitated by the fact that the animals and plants inside the collector - cages create a polycultural community: bivalves, algae, shrimp, and sea urchins produce DOM (dissolved organic matter) that serves as food for bacteria²⁶ and for phytoplankton,^27,28 on which bivalves actively feed.^29,30 Cultivated bivalves are often resistant to fouling,³¹ they use various protective mechanisms against predators,³² including some fouling organisms on shell that help in this.³³

Some of predators can have an adverse effect both on scallop’s competitors^34-36 and on other predators.³⁷ In addition, larvae of main scallop’s competitors Pacific mussel Mytilus trossulus and Japanese scallop Chlamys nipponensisas, as well as the predatory seastar Asterias amurensis settle in an upper horizon,³⁸ on conus larvae occupy of different sites⁴ and the highly productive years for M. trossulus and Ch. nipponensis basically do not coincide with those for P. yessoensis.³⁹ Competitors settle at a different time, which can also be used to optimize the contents of the collectors.¹¹ The connection with the bottom only via a weight (anchor), as well as the use of an cover of the collector, prevents colonization of bivalve shells by the shell-boring polychaete Polydora and barnacles, which reduce the rate of bivalves’ growth at the bottom.^40,11,41 Anchoring of collectors, in contrast to a suspension culture, reduces the stress on the cultivated species and increases the growth and survival rate in bivalves.⁴² By the second and third year, much fewer larvae of invertebrates settle on collectors.¹⁹ Many invertebrates, including main scallop’s competitor M. trossulus cannot not live longer than two years in Posyet Bay⁴³ and closing the inner part of collector with cones prevents movements of predators in it.

Thus, the “transplantation-free” method of scallop cultivation is as follows: to obtain a constant and optimum number of larvae, which allows improving the conditions for their cultivation, the forecast of their harvest is made based on the number of days with sea ice in shallow bays. For this purpose the graph showing interrelation of the sum of ice days and abundance of young on collectors I divide into three equal parts. Years with the number of sea ice days smaller than or equal to 103 are classified as lean; from 103 to 108, medium-productive; and more than 108, productive. In the case of a lean year, the collector walls are set up at a horizon of 14-16 m and at an angle of 90-120° relative to the shore on day 25-32 after the beginning of scallop spawning in shallow bays. In the case of a medium-productive year, the wall is set up at a horizon 12-14 m at an angle of 120-150° to the shore on day 15 to 20 after the beginning of scallop spawning; in the case of a productive year they are installed at a horizon of 10-12 m and at an angle of 150-180° relative to the shore since the autumn of the previous year. In case of a lean year, the walls set up in the sea have the cover with a mesh size of 5-8 mm; in the case of a medium-productive, with a mesh size of 8-11 mm; and in case of a productive year, with a mesh size of 11-15 mm.²² In the near-shore waters of Posyet Bay, hydrological facilities are characterized by quasi-two-year oscillations.⁴⁴ Harvests of young scallop also show quasi-two-year fluctuations.³ A lean year is, as a rule, followed by a productive year. Therefore, setting up the walls in the autumn of a lean year reduces the number of larvae settling in the productive year. This provides an opportunity to stabilize and optimize the cultivation process.

If the forecast predicted a harvest below the optimum one, it can be increased by artificial spawning of producers and by releasing 2-4 day old trochophores and veligers at a distance of 2-3 km from the farm.²² To stimulate the scallop spawning and optimize its reproduction, it is necessary to launch artificial upwelling during two days each year.⁴⁵

The technology of the Pacific oyster (Crassostrea gigas) cultivation involves several labor intensive operations. To collect larvae from plankton in the sea, P. yessoensis shell are stringed on a wire and immersed into the sea. After settling of oyster larvae, special partition plates are placed between the neighboring shell in autumn, excessive juveniles are removed from each valve.² Juvenile oyster, settling on the valves, attaches to the substrate with the entire surface of its lower shell, and removing it during harvesting poses a significant danger both to the oyster and to worker’s hands. Our collector for collecting and growing-out oyster larvae up to a marketable size consists of a bunch with plastic rings, the flat part of which has a deepening stimulating the larval settlement.²⁰ After the settlement is complete, the distance between the rings is easily increased by untying one knot. The narrow size of the rings does not allow the bivalve to attach with its entire lower shell surface, and the influence of the neighboring molluscs makes them all grow upward (Figure 4). This arrangement of oysters on the substrate reduces competition between molluscs and facilitates harvesting of the grown animals. The obtained results of oyster cultivation without thinning on various substrates in two Bays allow us to draw a conclusion about practicability of the simplified technology of growing of this bivalve (Table 3 & 4). The weight of meat of molluscs grown by us almost does not differ from the values for oyster grown by the traditional technology in the same bay, and presented by V.А. Rakov.²

Figure 4 Conus from collector-cage with juvenile of P. yessoensis.

These materials allow us to conclude that bivalve aquaculture provides an opportunity to harvest without damage to valuable accompanying species and that grown up bivalves will have a higher taste quality and other useful properties, as they are cultivated in their natural habitat.

Author are thankful to Shvetsov E.P. for improving English language. This work is executed at partial support by grand DVO Russian Academy of Sciences No 115081110035.

None.

1. Belogrudov EA. Biology and cultivation of Japanese scallops. Cultivation of Pacific invertebrate and seaweed. In: Morkovtsev V & Bregman Y (Eds.), Moskow, Russia. 1987;pp.66–71.
2. Rakov VA. Biology and cultivation of oysters. Cultivation of Pacific invertebrate and seaweed. In: Morkovtsev V& Bregman Y (Eds.), Moskow, Russia, Agropromizdat. 1987;pp.72–84.
3. Gabaev DD. Creation of optimum conditions for cultivation of scallop and mussel in Posyet Bay. Fish economy. 1986 ;(7):42–43.
4. Gabaev DD. Biological substantiation of new methods cultivation of some trade bivalve molluscs in Primorye. Ph.D. thesis. 1989;pp.1–129.
5. Zuk AP, Novoselova EC. Organizational–economic bases of formations of a control system by innovative activity in mariculture farms and their design realisation PSRIFO. 2009 ;(157):312–327.
6. Rakov VA. Cultivation of mollusks at France. Soviet Journal of Marine Biology. 1984;(1):67–72.
7. Khasegava I. Cultivation of scallop. Taiye Gege. 1987.
8. Claereboudt MR, Bureau D, Côte J, et al. Fouling development and its effect on the growth of juvenile giant scallops (Placopecten magellanicus) in suspended culture. Aquaculture. 1994 ;(121):327–342.
9. Miron G, Pelletier P, Bourget E. Optimizing the design of giant scallop (Placopecten magellanicus) spat collectors: flume experiments. Marine Biology. 1995;123(2):285–291.
10. Pouliot F, Bourget E, Fréchette M. Optimizing the design of giant scallop (Placopecten magellanicus) spat collectors: field experiments. Marine Biology. 1995;123(2):277–284.
11. Chauvaud L, Thouzeau G, Grall J. Experimental collection of great scallop postlarvae and other benthic species in the Bay of Brest: settlement patterns in relation to spatio–temporal variability of environmental factors. Aquacult Intern. 1996;4(3):263–288.
12. Soria G, Lavín MF, Martínez–Tovar I, et al. Recruitment of catarina scallop (Argopecten ventricosus) larvae on artificial collectors off the NE coast of the Gulf of California. Aquaculture Research. 2013;44(9):1383–1398.
13. Fanelli G, Prato E, Parlapiano I, et al. Effect of immersion time on scallops settlement on artificial collectors (Taranto Gulf, Mediterranean Sea). Aquaculture Europe. 2015.
14. Prato E, Biandolino F, Parlapiano I, et al. The recruitment of scallops (and beyond) by two different artificial collectors (Gulf of Taranto, Mediterranean Sea). Aquaculture Research. 2016;47(10):3319–3331.
15. Fréchette M, Gaudet M, Vigneau S. Estimating optimal population density for intermediate culture of scallops in spat collector bags. Aquaculture. 2000;183(2000):105–124.
16. Ito S, Kanno H, Takahashi K. Some problems on culture of the scallop in Mutsu Bay. Bull Mar Biol St Asamushi. 1975;15(2):89–100.
17. Rus. patent № 826998. Collector for artificial cultivation of mollusks / Gabaev DD, lyvov SM. applied for 18.06.79; published. Bul. 1981;(17):5.
18. claim 55–23046. Method and appliance for harvest of swimming in depth of water of larvae mollusks (Japan). № 51–61992. applied for 23.05.76; published 20.06.80.
19. Gabaev DD. Through – cultivation of commercials bivalve mollusks in Posyet Bay, Sea of Japan. Fishery questions. 2008;9(1):218–243.
20. Rus. patent № 886869. Collector for artificial cultivation of mollusks / gabaev DD, lyvov S.M., Kalachnikov V.Z. applied for 03.04.80; published 07.12.81.(45):19.
21. Borovikov VP. Statistica:The Art of Computer Data Analysis for Professionals.Piter, St. Petersburg. 2003.
22. Rus. patent № 11178371. Method cultivation of sea scallop and equipment for its reduction / Gabaev DD. applied for 26.07.83; published 15.09.85.(34):10.
23. Lodeiros CJM, Himmelman JH. Influence of fouling on the growth and survival of the tropical scallop, Euvola (Pecten) ziczac (L. 1758) in suspended culture. Aquaculture Research. 1996;27(10):749–756.
24. Su Z, Xiao H, Yan Y, et al. Effect of Fouling Organisms on Food Uptake and Nutrient Release of Scallop (Chlamys nobilis, Reeve) Cultured in Daya Bay. J Ocean Univ Chin. 2008;7(1):93–96.
25. Aquilar REL. Problem of biofouling in the culture of Argopecten purpuratus in Peru. Revista AquaTIC. 2011;35:9–19.
26. Weiss M, Simon M. Consumption of labile dissolved organic matter by limnetic barterioplankton: the relative significance of amino acids and carbohydrates. Aquat Microb Ecology. 1999;17:1–12.
27. Solovjova AL, Galkina VN, Garkovskaya GP. Experimental studying of influence of the dissolved organic substance of metabolite of mussels on natural community of a phytoplankton of the White sea. Oceanology. 1977;17(3):449–458.
28. LeBlanc AR, Landry T, Miron G. Fouling organisms of the blue mussel Mytilus edulis their effect on nutrient uptake and release. J. Shellfish Res. 2003;22(3):633–638.
29. Mikulich LV, Tsychon–Lukanina ЕA. Structure of food of the Japanese scallop. Oceanology. 1981;21(5):894–897.
30. Amouroux JM. Preliminary study on the consumption of dissolved organic matter (exudates) of bacteria and phytoplankton by the marine bivalve Venus verrucosa. Marine Biology. 1984;82(2):109–112.
31. Carraro JL, Rupp GS, Mothes B, et al. Characterization of the fouling community of macroinvertebrates on the scallop Nodipecten nodosus (Mollusca, Pectinidae) farmed in Santa Catarina, Brazil. Ciencias Marinas. 2012;38(3):577–588.
32. Freeman AS, Meszaros J, Byers JE. Poor phenotypic integration of blue mussel inducible defenses in environments with multiple predators. Oikos. 2009;118(5):758–766.
33. Farren HM, Donovan DA. Effects of sponge and barnacle encrustation on survival of the scallop Chlamys hastata. Hydrobiologia. 2007;592(1):225–234.
34. Gabaev DD, Kolotukhina NK. The effect of predation by Nucella (Thais) heyseana on population of japanese scallop Mizuhopecten yessoensis (Jay). Russian Journal of Ecology. 1999;30(2):133–135.
35. Ross KA, Thorpe JP, Brand AR. Biological control of fouling in suspended scallop cultivation. Aquaculture. 2004;229:99–116.
36. Cook EJ, Kelly MS. Co–culture of the sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus and the edible mussel Myilus edulis L. on the west coast of scotland United Kingdom. J of Shellfish Research. 2009;28(3):553–559.
37. Dernbach EM, Freeman AS. Foraging preference of whelks Nucella lapillus in robust to influences of wave exposure and predator cues. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2015;540:135–144.
38. Gabaev DD. Settlement of larvae of bivalve mollusks and starfishes on collectors in Pos’yet bay (Sea of japan). Soviet Journal of Marine Biology. 1982;7(4):263–268.
39. Gabaev DD. Dynamics of the abundance of some bivalve species in Russian waters of the Sea of Japan and its prognosis. Oceanology. 2009;49(2):218–227.
40. Ovsyannikova II, Levin VS. Growth dynamics of barnacle Solidobalanus hesperius on the shucks of Japanese scallop at the bottom cultivation. Soviet Journal of Marine Biology. 1982;(4):44–51.
41. Gabaev DD. Effects of fouling on the Japanese scallop Mizuhopecten yessoensis (Jay) in Peter the Great Bay (Sea of Japan). Oceanology. 2013;53(2):183–191.
42. Hunauld P, Vélez A, Jordan N, et al. Contribution of food availability to the more rapid growth of the scallop, Euvola ziczac (Pteroida, Pectinidae) in bottom than in suspended culture. Rev Biol Trop. 2005;53(3–4):455–461.
43. Gabaev DD. succession and climax at fouling of artificial substrates in Posyet Bay, Sea of Japan. Molluscs. Morphology, taxonomy, genealogy, biogeography and ecology: Proceeding of the Seventh (VII) conference on studying of molluscs. 2007;pp.69–71.
44. Vinokurova ТТ, Skokleneva NM. Intramonth’s variability of the hydrometeorological characteristics of coastal areas of the Posyet Bay. Proc. PSRIFO. 1981;105:26–32.
45. Gabaev DD, Kucheryavenko AV, Shepel NA. Anthropogenic eutrophication of Posyet Bay in the Sea of Japan, caused by mariculture installations. Russian Journal of Marine Biology. 1998;24:53–62.