Submit manuscript...
International Journal of
eISSN: 2573-2889

Molecular Biology: Open Access

Research Article Volume 7 Issue 1

Genome-wide in silico analysis of alpha-hairpinin in tepary bean (Phaseolus acutifolius)

Maria Cidinaria Silva Alve,1 Ruana Carolina Cabral da Silva2

1Department of Genetics, Center for Biosciences, Federal University of Pernambuco, Brazil
2Center for Research in Biological Sciences - Nupeb, Federal University of Ouro Preto, Brazil

Correspondence: Maria Cidinaria Silva Alves, Department of Genetics, Center for Biosciences, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil

Received: November 14, 2024 | Published: November 29, 2024

Citation: Alve MCS, Silva RCC. Genome-wide in silico analysis of alpha-hairpinin in tepary bean (Phaseolus acutifolius). Int J Mol Biol Open Access. 2024;7(1):158-162. DOI: 10.15406/ijmboa.2024.07.00188

Download PDF

Abstract

This study characterized antimicrobial peptides of the α-hairpinin family in the genome of tepary bean (Phaseolus acutifolius). Ten sequences with the α-hairpinin motif (PaHrp1-10) were identified. These motifs were found in proteins with Kunitz_legume, Peptidase_C1/Inhibitor_I29, and Root_cap domains. Most PaHrps exhibited a signal peptide in the N-terminal region, except for PaHrp1, PaHrp5, and PaHrp10. The α-hairpinin motifs varied in length from 19 to 34 amino acids, with molecular weights ranging from 2.08 kDa to 3.74 kDa, and isoelectric points ranging from 3.58 to 9.13. In silico analyses showed that PaHrp7 has antifungal, antibacterial, and antiviral activities, while PaHrp1 and PaHrp9 exhibited antifungal and antibacterial activities. PaHrp6 demonstrated antifungal and antiviral activities, and PaHrp8 showed antibacterial and antiviral activities. PaHrp2 and PaHrp4 exhibited only antiviral activity; PaHrp5 and PaHrp10 showed antifungal activity; and PaHrp3 exhibited only antibacterial activity. The 10 PaHrp genes were mapped to six of the 11 chromosomes of the species, with Chr11 anchoring five genes (PaHrp5-9). The PaHrp motifs exhibited four conserved cysteine residues, forming two disulfide bridges characteristic of α-hairpinins. This study expands knowledge about antimicrobial peptides in P. acutifolius, suggesting their potential for therapeutic and biotechnological applications in agriculture and human health.

Keywords: In silico analysis, α-hairpinin famil, genomic, antimicrobial peptides

Introduction

The α-hairpinin family of antimicrobial peptides was recently identified in plants, possessing a specific signature motif (C1XXXC2-X(n)-C3XXXC4).1–3 α-hairpinin proteins exhibit a secondary structure composed of two antiparallel α-helices connected by a loop (helix-loop-helix), stabilized in the tertiary structure by two disulfide bonds (Cys1-Cys4/Cys2-Cys3).4–6 α-hairpinin peptides are sources of bioactive molecules with a wide structural diversity and exhibit various biological activities.3 They demonstrate antifungal and antibacterial activity in several species, including barnyard grass (Echinochloa crus-galli),7 chickweed (Stellaria media),8 macadamia (Macadamia integrifolia),9 and wheat (Triticum kiharae).5 Among the α-hairpinin peptides with trypsin inhibitory activity are BWI-2a and BWI-2b from buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum),4 C2 from pumpkin (Cucurbita maxima)10 and VhTI from Veronica hederifolia.11 Additionally, some α-hairpinins possess ribosome-inactivating activity, such as Luffin P1 from sponge gourd (Luffa cylindrica).12 Due to these diverse biological activities, this family of short peptides, with potent antimicrobial activities and a relatively simple structure, is a promising candidate for biotechnological applications.2 Tepary bean (Phaseolus acutifolius) is a sister species of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), highly adapted to heat and drought.13–15 Native to the Sonoran Desert, this species possesses genetic characteristics that make it resilient to moderate thermal stress conditions, with a reduced genetic repertoire for disease resistance, consistent with its adaptation to arid and hot environments.16,17

The significant genetic similarity and shared content among Phaseolus species provide a valuable foundation for engineering climate adaptation in common beans, a critical crop for food security. 18,19 Additionally, tepary bean shows promise as an alternative protein source for regions facing hotter and drier conditions. However, its wider adoption remains limited due to challenges like insufficient marketing and less appealing culinary qualities.18 The objective of this study was to characterize the antimicrobial peptides of the α-hairpinin family present in the genome of tepary bean, analyzing their physicochemical characteristics, in silico biological activities, and three-dimensional structure.

Materials and methods

Genome retrieval and α-hairpinin identification

The genome of P. acutifolius was obtained from Phytozome (ID: 580, NCBI taxonomy ID: 33129).20 The identification of sequences belonging to the α-hairpinin family was conducted using the Cysmotif Searcher21 with a cysteine motif pattern (C1XXXC2-X(n)-C3XXXC4) characteristic of this family.1,22

Sequence characterization

Candidate sequences were subjected to InterProScan (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/interpro/search/sequence/) to identify characteristic conserved domains of the α-hairpinin class. The presence of signal peptides was predicted using SignalP 6.0,23 while subcellular localization was predicted using the ProtComp 9.0 tool from Softberry Inc. (Mount Kisco, NY, USA). Subsequently, sequences were evaluated for molecular weight (MW), isoelectric point (pI), and grand average of hydropathicity (GRAVY) using ExPASy ProtParam software (http://web.expasy.org/protparam/). Conserved sequence patterns were analyzed through multiple sequence alignment using Clustal Omega.24

In silico biological activity analysis

Candidate sequences were evaluated for antimicrobial activity using CAMPR3, employing four different algorithms: Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), and Discriminant Analysis (DA),25 in addition to ClassAMP.26 Antifungal activity was analyzed using Antifp27 and antiviral activity using Meta-iVP.28 Activity was considered significant for predictions with a score greater than 0.5 (50%).

Results and discussion

After mining, 10 sequences containing the α-hairpinin motif from P. acutifolius (PaHrp1-10) were identified. This motif was found in proteins with Kunitz_legume (1), Peptidase_C1/Inhibitor_I29 (3), and Root_cap (6) domains (Table 1-S1), as observed in plant species such as the legume Peltophorum dubium.29 Most PaHrps exhibited a signal peptide in the N-terminal region, except for PaHrp1, PaHrp5, and PaHrp10. The α-hairpinin motifs varied in length from 19 (PaHrp7) to 34 (PaHrp2-4) amino acids (aa), with an average length of 31 aa. The molecular weight of the proteins ranged from 2.08 kDa (PaHrp10) to 3.74 kDa (PaHrp9), and the isoelectric point (pI) ranged from 3.58 (PaHrp4) to 9.13 (PaHrp7 and PaHrp9) (Table 1). α-hairpinins are low molecular weight antimicrobial peptides (10 kDa), and so far, few α-hairpinins have been reported, including MBP-1, MiAMP2s, Ec-AMP1, Luffin P1, VhT1, BWI-2c, Tk-AMP-Xs, and Sm-AMP-X.2,3 In lima bean (Phaseolus lunatus), PlHrp1 was present in 41 aminoacids, with a pI of 6.28 and molecular mass of 4.81.6 The 10 PaHrp genes were mapped onto the chromosomes of P. acutifolius (Figure 1). Out of the species' 11 chromosomes, only 6 contain PaHrp genes. Chromosome 11 (Chr11) harbors 5 genes (PaHrp5-9), while the remaining chromosomes each contain only one gene: Chr01 (PaHrp4), Chr04 (PaHrp1), Chr06 (PaHrp10), Chr07 (PaHrp2), and Chr09 (PaHrp3).

Figure 1 Distribution of PaHrp genes across chromosomes. The scale represents megabases (Mb). Chromosome numbers are indicated above each vertical bar.

 

 

Protein

Motifs

Gene

Gene-ID

Domain

Signal peptide

pI

MW

Length

pI

MW

PaHrp1

Phacu.CVR.004G172300.1

Kunitz_legume

Not

8.85

23.01

31

4.86

3.48

PaHrp2

Phacu.CVR.007G109100.1

Peptidase_C1/

Yes

8.95

50.54

34

3.66

3.69

   

Inhibitor_I29

           

PaHrp3

Phacu.CVR.009G138200.1

Peptidase_C1/

Yes

6.05

40.09

34

3.8

3.59

   

Inhibitor_I29

           

PaHrp4

Phacu.CVR.001G009700.1

Peptidase_C1/

Yes

6.16

39.75

34

3.58

3.63

   

Inhibitor_I29

           

PaHrp5

Phacu.CVR.011G192600.1

Root_cap

Not

7.84

37.76

32

6.21

3.31

PaHrp6

Phacu.CVR.011G192300.1

Root_cap

Yes

8.24

40.61

33

6.17

3.5

PaHrp7

Phacu.CVR.011G088000.1

Root_cap

Yes

8.82

43.87

19

9.31

3.63

PaHrp8

Phacu.CVR.011G192500.1

Root_cap

Yes

7.84

37.76

32

6.21

3.59

PaHrp9

Phacu.CVR.011G088000.2

Root_cap

Yes

8.82

43.87

30

9.31

3.74

PaHrp10

Phacu.CVR.006G153300.1

Root_cap

Not

5.75

29.2

32

4.65

2.08

Table 1 Gene identification
aa, motif length; pI, isoelectric point; MW, molecular weight; GRAVY, average hydropathy index

Gene

Sequence

Size

Pfam

PaHrp1

MLHSETMKDSLLPFSILSFAFTIQLFIGIAVAAPEPVVDTSGQKLRTGVKYYILPVFRGKGGGLTVSSSGNNTCPLFVVQEKLEVLNGTPVTFTPYNAKSGVILTSTDLNIKSYGTTTSCDKPPVWKLLKVLTGVWFLSTGGVEGNPGIDTIVNWFKIEKAEKDYVISFCPSVCKCQTLCRELGLYVGDDGNKHLSLSDKVPSFRVMFKRA

398

pfam00197

PaHrp2

MLNLTAACCHLSMRLQFTLLPLHYTLMYSPAPPFQGYNCNYIIHEENPIKRRRRRRRRKTKLVAEQAEEARTNMVAKRGHALSCFARISLVLFALTLSSARQTTVHDIAKKLKLEDNQLLRTEKKFNVFMENYGKKYSTREEYLQRLEIFAGNMLRAAENQALDPTAIHGVTQFSDLTEDEFQRHYTGVNGGFPWNNGVRDVAPPLKVDGLPEDFDWREKGAVTEVKMQGKCGSCWAFSTTGSIEGANFIATGKLLNLSEQQLVDCDNQCDITESTTCDNGCMGGLMTNAYKYLLQSGGLEEESSYPYTGAKGECKFDPGKVAVRITNFTNIPVDENQIAAYLVKHGPLAIGLNAIFMQTYIGGVSCPLICSKKWLNHGVLLVGYRAKGFSILRLGNKPYWIIKNSWGKRWGVDGYYKLCRGHGMCGMNTMVSAAMVTQTQTPSHNYASY

398

smart00848

PaHrp3

MATPSLFFLFSLLLFSATLVIANRIDGEDDLLIRQVVPDAEEHLLNAEHHFSAFKTKFGRTYATKEEHDYRFRIFKNNLLRAKSHQKLDPSAVHGVTKFSDLTPAEFSRQFLGLKPLRLPSDAQKAPILPTSDLPSDFDWRDHGAVTGVKNQGSCGSCWSFSAVGALEGAHFLSTGELVSLSEQQLVDCDHECDPEERGACDAGCGGGLMTNAFEYSLKAGGLMRENDYPYIGRDRGPCKFDKSRIAASVANFSVVSLDEEQIAANLVKNGPLAVGINAIFMQTYIGGVSCPYICGKHLDHGVLLVGYGAGAYAPIRFKEKPFWIIKNSWGESWGENGYYKICRGHNVCGVDSMVSTVAAIHTSSH

263

smart00848

PaHrp4

MARYTLCALLLFAAVAAAAAGASTDADDILIRQVVPEGEVEDHLLNAEHHFSTFKVKFGKTYATKEEHDHRFGVFKSNMRRARLHAQLDPSAVHGVTKFSDLTPAEFHRQFLGLKPLRLPAHAQKAPILPTNNLPKDFDWRDKGAVTNVKDQGSCGSCWSFSTTGALEGAHFLATGELVSLSEQQLVDCDHVCDPEEYGACDAGCNGGLMNNAFEYIIGSGGVQREKDYPYTGRDGTCKFDKSKIAASVSNYSVVSLDEEQIAANLVKNGPLAVAINAVYMQTYVGGVSCPYICGKHLDHGVLLVGYGEGAYAPIRFKEKPYWIIKNSWGENWGENGYYKICRGRNVCGVDSMVSTVGAIHASTQ

341

smart00848

PaHrp5

MEITKGSSIIIAVLLFVSCLSLQANAYYYRQCSTKGTRCYGKYIRCPNECPSSESTDPKAKVCQIDCDKPICRAVCRSRKPNCNAPGSGCYDPRFIGGDGRVFYFHGKTNEHFALVSDSSLQINARFIGHRPAGRARDYTWIQALGVLFNSKTLSLEAPKTSQWNEDVDHLKFTYNGNHLLLPQGPLSTWHSPQKDVKVERVAARNSVIVTLEDVAEILVNVVPVTKEDDAVHNYQVPQDDCFAHLEVQFRFFGLSPKVDGVLGRTYREDFENPAKVGVAMPVVGGEDKYRTTSLLSPNCASCVFSPPSSHHIEATEVSAELMGTLDCSKFSYGLGIVCKK

341

pfam06830

PaHrp6

MSFSINSDLLVFTSNWYLLVYKRKAMSVSSRNSLIYLLLLFAFCEMQIIAGKDTQTCISRKSPCFGKKVPCPDECPQKSPSDPKAKVCYLDCDSPICQAQCKTRKPNCNDRGSACLDPRFVGADGIVFYFHGRRNEHFALVSDVNLQINARFIGLRPATRTRDYTWIQALGLLFGSHKFTIEAIPAASWNDEVDHLKFSHNGKELAIPNGYLSTWQCPQNQLRIERTSSKNSVTITLPEVAEIFVNVVPVTNEDSRIHNYQIPKEDCFAHLEVQFKFHGLSSKVEGILGRTYQPDFQNPAKLGVAMAVVGGEDKYRTTSLVSADCGVCLFDGGKESSEKINSVSEYGLLDCTAAANSGNGIVCRR

365

pfam06830

PaHrp7

MGGKKWSILVAIFILLIAMEAAIAQGQGNGNDKGKGNENGNGNGKGKGSDNGKGKGEGSDDGKGKKNKKDDGKEKKPKEKKPKKQRDEASDYDKLSALPSGQERGFCRTNTTCEFKTIVCPSECAERKPKKNKKKKACFIDCSSSTCEATCKVRKANCDGYGSLCYDPRFVGGDGVMFYFHGAKGGNFAIVSDEEFQINAHFIGSRPQGRTRDYTWVQALGVMFDSHTLVIAANRVSHWNDKVDSLTVKWDGEVINVPTDGEAEWRANGDEREVVVERTDETNSVRVMVSGLVEMDISVKPIGEQENKVHNYQLPQNDAFAHLETQFRFKKSTDNFEGVLGQTYRPGYVSPVKRGVPMPMMGGENKYQTLSLFSTSCKRCMFQRPSSIASTEGLVAQY

211

pfam06830

PaHrp8

MEITKGSSIIIAVLLFVSCLSLQANAYYYRQCSTKGTRCYGKYIRCPNECPSSESTDPKAKVCQIDCDKPICRAVCRSRKPNCNAPGSGCYDPRFIGGDGRVFYFHGKTNEHFALVSDSSLQINARFIGHRPAGRARDYTWIQALGVLFNSKTLSLEAPKTSQWNEDVDHLKFTYNGNHLLLPQGPLSTWHSPQKDVKVERVAARNSVIVTLEDVAEILVNVVPVTKEDDAVHNYQVPQDDCFAHLEVQFRFFGLSPKVDGVLGRTYREDFENPAKVGVAMPVVGGEDKYRTTSLLSPNCASCVFSPPSSHHIEATEVSAELMGTLDCSKFSYGLGIVCKK

450

pfam06830

PaHrp9

MGGKKWSILVAIFILLIAMEAAIAQGQGNGNDKGKGNENGNGNGKGKGSDNGKGKGEGSDDGKGKKNKKDDGKEKKPKEKKPKKQRDEASDYDKLSALPSGQERGFCRTNTTCEFKTIVCPSECAERKPKKNKKKKACFIDCSSSTCEATCKVRKANCDGYGSLCYDPRFVGGDGVMFYFHGAKGGNFAIVSDEEFQINAHFIGSRPQGRTRDYTWVQALGVMFDSHTLVIAANRVSHWNDKVDSLTVKWDGEVINVPTDGEAEWRANGDEREVVVERTDETNSVRVMVSGLVEMDISVKPIGEQENKVHNYQLPQNDAFAHLETQFRFKKSTDNFEGVLGQTYRPGYVSPVKRGVPMPMMGGENKYQTLSLFSTSCKRCMFQRPSSIASTEGLVAQY

366

pfam06830

PaHrp10

MEHVCPNACPRGCEVDCITCKPVCKCDRPGAVCQDPRFIGGDGITFYFHGKKDRNFCLVSDPNLHINAHFIGRRNNNMKRDFTWVQSIAILFDNHQLFVGALRTPTWEDHIDRLALTFDGQPLTLYESEGATWTSSTVPNVSIVRTTSTNSVLVEVEGRLRVTAKVVPITEEDSRIHDYGITKEDCFAHLDLGFKFFTLSNEVSGVLGQTYKASYVSRVNVGANMPVMGGGKEFETTSLFSPDCSVARFIGKNELTEGDAFVS

365

pfam06830

Table S1 Identification of complete sequences with the α-hairpinin motif in yellow, length, Pfam e domain.

Alignment results revealed that the PaHrp motifs exhibited four conserved cysteine (C) residues, forming two disulfide bonds with the characteristic pattern of α-hairpinins (Figure 2). α-hairpinins have a structure characterized by a helix-loop-helix motif, with four cysteine residues forming two disulfide bonds, thereby conferring stability to the structure.2,30 Despite showing high similarity in spatial structure, α-hairpinins exhibit low sequence homology and high functional diversity.3,30,31 These findings suggest that, despite the structural conservation of cysteines, variability in amino acid sequences may be related to the functional adaptation of these proteins, reflecting a wide range of specific biological activities.6 Analyses of in silico biological activities demonstrated that only PaHrp7 exhibited antifungal, antibacterial, and antiviral activities. PaHrp1 and PaHrp9 showed antifungal and antibacterial activities, PaHrp6 exhibited antifungal and antiviral activities, and PaHrp8 showed antibacterial and antiviral activities. PaHrp2 and PaHrp4 displayed only antiviral activity, while PaHrp5 and PaHrp10 showed antifungal activity, and PaHrp3 exhibited antibacterial activity (Table 2). In vitro antimicrobial assays demonstrated that maize α-hairpinin (MBP-1) contributed to grain resistance against infection caused by pathogenic fungi and bacteria such as Fusarium moniliforme and F. graminearum, as well as action against Escherichia coli and Clavibacter michiganense.32 Suppression of growth in filamentous fungi and bacteria was also observed in α-hairpinins from Stellaria media,8 Triticum kiharae,5 and Echinochloa crus-galli.33

Figure 2 Multiple alignment of PaHrps demonstrating low sequence conservation, but revealing the conserved cysteines characteristic of α-hairpinins.

Gene

ClassAMP

ANTIFP

Meta-iAVP

SVM

Score

RF

Score

Prediction

Score

Prediction

Score

PaHrp1

Antifungal

0.977

Antibacterial

0.550

Antifungal

0,200

Non-AVP

0.406

PaHrp2

Antiviral

0.778

Antiviral

0.398

Antifungal

0,039

AVP

0.928

PaHrp3

Antibacterial

0.711

Antibacterial

0.408

Antifungal

0,003

Non-AVP

0

PaHrp4

Antiviral

0.810

Antibacterial

0.426

Antifungal

0,115

AVP

0.876

PaHrp5

Antifungal

0.900

Antibacterial

0.394

Antifungal

0,285

Non-AVP

0.294

PaHrp6

Antifungal

0.939

Antibacterial

0.484

Antifungal

0,179

AVP

0.524

PaHrp7

Antifungal

0.905

Antibacterial

0.612

Antifungal

0,635

AVP

0.962

PaHrp8

Antibacterial

0.940

Antibacterial

0.436

Non-Antifungal

-0,095

AVP

0.630

PaHrp9

Antifungal

0.894

Antibacterial

0.610

Antifungal

0,713

Non-AVP

0.316

PaHrp10

Antifungal

0.934

Antibacterial

0.454

Antifungal

0,641

Non-AVP

0.016

Table 2 Antimicrobial and antiviral potential of PaHrps.
SVM, support vector machine; RFC, random forest classifier, DAC, discriminant analysis classifier

Conclusion

This study significantly expands the understanding of antimicrobial peptides in P. acutifolius, particularly by characterizing α-hairpinin motifs across 10 identified PaHrp sequences. The structural versatility, despite low sequence homology, suggests an adaptive functional role that could be harnessed in various applications. The unique distribution of PaHrp genes across multiple chromosomes and the ability of certain peptides, like PaHrp7, to exhibit multi-target antimicrobial activity further underscore the potential of P. acutifolius peptides as valuable resources for developing therapeutic agents and enhancing crop protection strategies. These findings support future research into the biotechnological applications of PaHrps in agriculture and human health, paving the way for new avenues in natural antimicrobial development.

Acknowledgments

We thank ChatGPT for assistance with the translation of this article. We also thank CAPES (Level Personnel Coordination Superior, Brazil) and CNPq (National Council for Scientific and Technological Development) for fellowships and financial support.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Culver KD, Sadecki PW, Jackson JK, et al. Identification and characterization of CC-AMP1-like and CC-AMP2-like peptides in capsicum spp. J Proteome Res. 2024;23(8):2948–2960.
  2. Slavokhotova AA, Rogozhin EA. Defense peptides from the α-hairpinin family are components of plant innate immunity. Front Plant Sci. 2020;11:465.
  3. Tam JP, Wang S, Wong KH, Tan WL. Antimicrobial peptides from plants. Pharmaceuticals. 2015;8(4):711–757.
  4. Oparin PB, Mineev KS, Dunaevsky YE, et al. Buckwheat trypsin inhibitor with helical hairpin structure belongs to a new family of plant defence peptides. Biochem J. 2012;446(1):69–77.
  5. Utkina LL, Andreev YA, Rogozhin EA, et al. Genes encoding 4-Cys antimicrobial peptides in wheat triticum kiharae Dorof. et Migush.: multimodular structural organization, instraspecific variability, distribution and role in defence. FEBS J. 2013;280(15):3594–3608.
  6. Silva Alves MC, Cabral Da Silva RC, Quaresma S. Characterization of α-hairpinin in the genome of lima bean (Phaseolus lunatus). Int J Mol Biol Open Access. 2024;7(1):112–116.
  7. Nolde SB, Vassilevski AA, Rogozhin EA, et al. Disulfide-stabilized helical hairpin structure and activity of a novel antifungal peptide EcAMP1 from seeds of barnyard grass (Echinochloa crus-galli). J Biol Chem. 2011;286(28):25145–25153.
  8. Slavokhotova AA, Rogozhin EA, Musolyamov AK, et al. Novel antifungal α-hairpinin peptide from stellaria media seeds: structure, biosynthesis, gene structure and evolution. Plant Mol Biol. 2014;84(1):189–202.
  9. Marcus JP, Green JL, Goulter KC, et al. A family of antimicrobial peptides is produced by processing of a 7S globulin protein in Macadamia integrifolia kernels. Plant J. 1999;19(6):699–710.
  10. Yamada K, Shimada T, Kondo M, et al. Multiple functional proteins are produced by cleaving Asn–Gln bonds of a single precursor by vacuolar processing enzyme. J Biol Chem. 1999;274(4):2563–2570.
  11. Conners R, Konarev AV, Forsyth J, et al. An unusual helix-turn-helix protease inhibitory motif in a novel trypsin inhibitor from seeds of veronica (veronica hederifolia L.). J Biol Chem. 2007;282(38):27760–27768.
  12. Li F, Yang X xiu, Xia H chuan, et al. Purification and characterization of Luffin P1, a ribosome-inactivating peptide from the seeds of Luffa cylindrica. Peptides. 2003;24(6):799–805.
  13. Beebe S, Ramirez J, Jarvis A, et al. Genetic Improvement of common beans and the challenges of climate change. In: Crop Adaptation To Climate Change. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2011. pp. 356–369.
  14. Souter JR, Gurusamy V, Porch TG, et al. Successful introgression of abiotic stress tolerance from wild tepary bean to common bean. Crop Science. 2017;57(3):1160–1171.
  15. Mwale SE, Shimelis H, Mafongoya P, et al. Breeding tepary bean (Phaseolus acutifolius) for drought adaptation: a review. Plant Breed. 2020;139(5):821–833.
  16. Rao I, Beebe S, Polania J, et al. Can tepary bean be a model for improvement of drought resistance in common bean? Afr Crop Sci J. 2013;21(4):265–281.
  17. Ravelombola W, Manley A, Pham H, et al. Genome-wide association study for seed yield of tepary bean using whole-genome resequencing. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25(20):11302.
  18. Moghaddam SM, Oladzad A, Koh C, et al. The tepary bean genome provides insight into evolution and domestication under heat stress. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):2638.
  19. Bornowski N, Hart JP, Palacios AV, et al. Genetic variation in a tepary bean (Phaseolus acutifolius A. Gray) diversity panel reveals loci associated with biotic stress resistance. Plant Genome. 2023;16(3):e20363.
  20. Goodstein DM, Shu S, Howson R, et al. Phytozome: a comparative platform for green plant genomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:D1178–D1186.
  21. Shelenkov AA, Slavokhotova AA, Odintsova TI. Cysmotif searcher pipeline for antimicrobial peptide identification in plant transcriptomes. Biochem Biokhimiia. 2018;83(11):1424–1432.
  22. Santos Silva CA, Zupin L, Oliveira LM, et al. Plant antimicrobial peptides: state of the art, in silico prediction and perspectives in the omics era. Bioinforma Biol Insights. 2020;14:1177932220952739.
  23. Teufel F, Almagro AJJ, Johansen AR, et al. SignalP 6.0 predicts all five types of signal peptides using protein language models. Nat Biotechnol. 2022;40(7):1023–1025.
  24. Sievers F, Higgins DG. Clustal omega, accurate alignment of very large numbers of sequences. Methods Mol Biol. 2014;1079:105–116.
  25. Waghu FH, Barai RS, Gurung P, et al. CAMPR3: a database on sequences, structures and signatures of antimicrobial peptides. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:D1094–D1097.
  26. Joseph S, Karnik S, Nilawe P, et al. Class AMP: a prediction tool for classification of antimicrobial peptides. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform. 2012;9(5):1535–1538.
  27. Agrawal P, Bhalla S, Chaudhary K, et al. In silico approach for prediction of antifungal peptides. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:323.
  28. Schaduangrat N, Nantasenamat C, Prachayasittikul V, et al. Meta-iAVP: a sequence-based meta-predictor for improving the prediction of antiviral peptides using effective feature representation. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(22):5743.
  29. Rodríguez DS, da Rosa G, Radío S, et al. Antimicrobial peptides in the seedling transcriptome of the tree legume Peltophorum dubium. Biochimie. 2021;180:229–242.
  30. Barashkova AS, Ryazantsev DY, Rogozhin EA. Rational design of plant hairpin-like peptide EcAMP1: structural-functional correlations to reveal antibacterial and antifungal activity. Molecules. 2022;27(11):3554.
  31. Kulaeva O, Kliukova M, Afonin A, et al. The role of plant antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) in response to biotic and abiotic environmental factors. Biol Commun. 2020;65(2):187–199.
  32. Duvick JP, Rood T, Rao AG, et al. Purification and characterization of a novel antimicrobial peptide from maize (Zea mays L.) kernels. J Biol Chem. 1992;267(26):18814–18820.
  33. Rogozhin EA, Ryazantsev DY, Grishin EV, et al. Defense peptides from barnyard grass (Echinochloa crusgalli L.) seeds. Peptides. 2012;38(1):33–40.
Creative Commons Attribution License

©2024 Alve, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.