This paper aims to provide a comparative analysis of pain relief techniques for chronic pain management in Ayurveda and modern medicine. The analysis is based on available literature and evidence of efficacy. The paper also explores the commonalities between these disciplines and suggests methods for integrating both disciplines for effective pain management.

Chronic pain is a prevalent health issue that affects millions of people worldwide.¹ Analgesics are used but the drug use has a significant cost and potential of side effects. While acute pain may need analgesics, their chronic use is undesirable and other potential methods including Ayurveda, homeopathy, hypnotherapy, acupuncture etc are worth exploring. Ayurveda is referred as alternative medicine and its use is quite prevalent in India from where it originated, however in the UK its use has not been high. In this paper we explore, analyses and summaries the possibilities of integrating modern or conventional medicine with Ayurveda. There are many approaches to pain management and some are more traditional including traditional Ayurveda and modern medicine.²

Through International Organization of Integrated Health Practitioners we have been making efforts to integrate the modern medicine with alternative and complementary therapies so that benefits of all health care disciplines can be offered to the patient at the point of care without prejudice and they all can complement each other rather than competing with each other.

In this paper we will analyses the pain relief techniques in Ayurveda and modern medicine, and also discusses the integration of these two disciplines for effective chronic pain management.

The burden of chronic pain in the UK

1. Chronic pain affects a significant proportion of the UK population, with estimates suggesting that approximately 28million adults, or 43% of the population, suffer from some form of chronic pain.³ Chronic pain, which is defined as pain that persists for more than three months, can have a profound impact on individuals' physical, emotional, and social well-being, leading to decreased quality of life and increased healthcare utilization.⁴
2. The economic burden of chronic pain on the National Health Service (NHS) in the UK is substantial, with direct healthcare costs estimated to be as high as £10billion annually.⁵ These costs include expenses related to primary care consultations, specialist referrals, diagnostic testing, prescription medications, and hospitalizations. Indirect costs associated with chronic pain, such as loss of productivity and disability benefits, are estimated to be even higher, reaching up to £25billion per year.⁶
3. Opioids are a commonly prescribed treatment for chronic pain in the UK, with approximately 24% of adults in England receiving at least one opioid prescription in 2017.⁷ However, the use of opioids for chronic pain management has been associated with numerous concerns, including addiction, overdose, and limited long-term efficacy.⁸ As a result, there is growing interest in exploring alternative and complementary therapies for chronic pain management, such as Ayurveda and integrative medicine.⁹
4. The NHS has recognized the need to address the burden of chronic pain more effectively and has implemented several strategies aimed at improving pain management. One such strategy is the Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) program, which aims to increase access to evidence-based psychological treatments for individuals suffering from chronic pain and other mental health conditions.¹⁰ Additionally, some NHS trusts have established integrated pain management services that offer a multidisciplinary approach to care, incorporating both pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapies.¹¹
5. Despite these efforts, the availability and accessibility of comprehensive pain management services remain inconsistent across the UK, with many chronic pain patients facing long waiting times and limited access to appropriate treatments.¹² To address these challenges and reduce the burden of chronic pain on the NHS, it is crucial to continue exploring and investing in innovative pain management strategies, such as the integration of Ayurveda and modern medicine, as well as to promote greater awareness and understanding of chronic pain among healthcare providers and the general public.¹³
6. The magnitude of chronic pain and the associated costs of pain management in the UK highlight the need for a more effective, patient-centered, and integrative approach to care. By leveraging the strengths of both Ayurveda and modern medicine, as well as fostering collaboration among healthcare professionals and increasing access to diverse pain management therapies, the NHS can work towards alleviating the burden of chronic pain and improving the quality of life for millions of individuals across the UK.¹⁴

It makes sense to think of various options to reduce  this burden of cost and suffering for patients. Ayurveda is an ancient branch of medicine developed nearly 5,000 years ago and has been helping relieving before modern medicine was developed. It is good to see how the theory of pain generation differs and if there is any commonness.

Ayurvedic medicine theory of pain generation: In Ayurveda, pain is believed to result from an imbalance among the three primary life forces or doshas (Vata, Pitta, and Kapha). Each dosha governs different physiological and psychological aspects, and an imbalance in any of these doshas can lead to disease or discomfort. Vata dosha, which is associated with movement, is particularly implicated in pain generation. When Vata becomes imbalanced, it can cause blockages in the flow of energy or prana, leading to physical discomfort, inflammation, and pain.

Modern medicine theory of pain generation

In modern medicine, the generation of pain is primarily understood through the concepts of nociception, inflammation, and central sensitization. Nociception is the process through which the nervous system detects and transmits information about potentially harmful stimuli to the brain. Inflammation occurs in response to injury or infection, leading to the release of various chemical mediators that can directly stimulate nociceptors, resulting in pain. Central sensitization involves the amplification of pain signals in the central nervous system, which can occur in response to chronic pain or repetitive nociceptive stimuli.

Comparison and commonness

Although Ayurveda and modern medicine have different frameworks for understanding the generation of pain, both recognize the importance of inflammation in the development of pain. In Ayurveda, imbalanced Vata dosha can lead to inflammation and pain, while modern medicine identifies specific inflammatory mediators and processes involved in pain generation.

Additionally, both Ayurveda and modern medicine emphasize the importance of a holistic approach to pain management. Ayurveda's concept of maintaining balance among the doshas for optimal health aligns with modern medicine's focus on addressing the biopsychosocial aspects of pain, recognizing that physical, psychological, and social factors can all contribute to pain experiences.

In summary, both Ayurvedic and modern medicine theories of pain generation emphasize the role of inflammation and the importance of a comprehensive approach to pain management. By recognizing these common elements and integrating the strengths of both disciplines, more effective and personalized pain management strategies can be developed.

Further commonalities

The role of diet and lifestyle: Both Ayurvedic medicine and modern medicine recognize the impact of diet and lifestyle on pain and inflammation.¹⁵ In Ayurveda, the concept of "Ahar" (diet) and "Vihar" (lifestyle) are critical for maintaining the balance of doshas, which in turn can influence pain perception.¹⁶ Similarly, modern medicine acknowledges that certain foods and lifestyle choices, such as a diet high in processed foods, sedentary behavior, and stress, can exacerbate inflammation and contribute to chronic pain.¹⁷

Non-pharmacological approaches: Ayurveda and modern medicine also share an interest in non-pharmacological approaches to pain management.¹⁸ Ayurvedic medicine uses techniques like yoga, meditation, massage, and herbal therapies to address the root cause of pain and bring balance to the doshas.¹⁹ Modern medicine is increasingly recognizing the value of non-pharmacological approaches such as cognitive-behavioral therapy, physical therapy, and mindfulness practices for managing pain, particularly in the context of the opioid crisis.²⁰

Personalized medicine: Ayurveda has always emphasized the individualized nature of treatment, considering the unique constitution (Prakriti) of each person when prescribing therapies.²¹ This approach aligns with the emerging field of personalized medicine in modern healthcare, which aims to tailor treatments based on individual genetic, environmental, and lifestyle factors to optimize outcomes.²²

The mind-body connection: Ayurvedic medicine considers the mind and body to be interconnected, with imbalances in mental or emotional well-being potentially impacting physical health and pain perception.²³ Modern medicine is also increasingly recognizing the importance of addressing psychological factors in pain management, such as catastrophizing, anxiety, and depression, which can influence pain experiences and outcomes.²⁴

By acknowledging these commonalities and learning from each other's approaches, Ayurvedic medicine and modern medicine can work together to provide more comprehensive, evidence-based, and individualized pain management strategies. This integrated approach can ultimately lead to better outcomes for patients suffering from chronic pain and an improved understanding of the complex nature of pain generation and treatment.²⁵

Let’s look at the pain relief methods, fundamental differences and possible overlaps.

Pain relief techniques in ayurveda

Ayurveda, an ancient Indian medical system, offers various non-pharmacological and pharmacological techniques for chronic pain management. Some common methods include:

1. Abhyanga (massage) using medicated oils, which has been shown to relieve pain and inflammation.²⁶
2. Panchakarma, a detoxification therapy that helps in eliminating toxins and reducing pain.²⁷
3. Herbal formulations like Yograj Guggulu and Dashamoola, which possess analgesic and anti-inflammatory properties.²⁸ Others are Haridra, Ashwagandha, Pushkar, Castor, Amahaldi

Pain relief techniques in modern medicine

Modern medicine offers a range of pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments for chronic pain management, including:

1. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), which effectively manage pain and inflammation.²⁹
2. Opioids, used for severe pain management but with the risk of addiction.⁸
3. Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), which helps patients develop coping strategies for pain.^30,31

Benefits and Risks of Pain Relief Treatment with Ayurveda and Modern Medicine: An Analysis

To understand the benefits and risks of pain relief treatments with Ayurveda and modern medicine, it is crucial to compare their methods, mechanisms of action, risk profiles, and efficacy percentages.

The following table provides a detailed analysis of representative treatments from both disciplines

Ayurveda 3 main benefits

1. Focuses on holistic, individualized treatment approaches
2. Emphasizes natural healing processes and methods
3. Lower risk profile, with fewer side effects compared to some modern treatments.^26,28

Ayurveda 2 main limitations

1. Limited scientific research and standardization of treatments.²
2. Possible adverse effects and interactions with modern medications.³²

Modern medicine 3 main benefits

1. Evidence-based, well-researched treatments.^8,29,31
2. Standardized guidelines and practice.³³
3. Demonstrated efficacy in a broad range of chronic pain conditions.^8,29,31

Modern medicine 2 main limitations

Potential side effects and long-term complications, particularly with medications such as NSAIDs and opioids.^8,29

Incomplete understanding of the chronic pain experience and its various contributing factors.³⁴

The table and analysis of risks and benefits above suggest that both Ayurveda and modern medicine have unique strengths and weaknesses in treating chronic pain. While Ayurveda offers holistic and natural approaches with a lower risk profile, modern medicine provides evidence-based treatments with standardized guidelines. The integration of these disciplines can maximize the benefits and minimize the risks associated with chronic pain management.

Further research is needed to evaluate the efficacy of integrated treatment approaches and understand the potential risks and benefits of combining Ayurvedic and modern medicine treatments. In addition, fostering collaboration between researchers and practitioners from both disciplines will help generate more comprehensive and effective treatment options for chronic pain patients.

Comparative analysis and commonalities

Comparing the two disciplines, it is evident that modern medicine offers higher levels of efficacy in pain management but with some risks, such as addiction to opioids.⁹ Ayurveda, on the other hand, provides a holistic approach with fewer side effects, but with moderate efficacy.³⁵ Some commonalities between these disciplines include the use of herbal formulations in Ayurveda and NSAIDs in modern medicine, both of which have anti-inflammatory and analgesic properties.³⁶

Integration of Ayurveda and modern medicine

Integrating Ayurveda and modern medicine can potentially lead to more effective chronic pain management. Some methods for integration include:

1. Combining non-pharmacological techniques from both disciplines, such as Abhyanga and CBT, to address the physical and psychological aspects of pain.³⁶
2. Conducting further research on herbal formulations in Ayurveda to explore their potential for integration with modern medicine.³⁷
3. Collaborative training programs for healthcare professionals to enable better understanding and implementation of integrated pain management.³⁸

Integration of ayurveda and modern medicine: a deeper look

Benefits

Increasing accessibility and improving patient outcomes

Integrating Ayurveda and modern medicine can have several advantages that extend beyond the immediate benefits of combining these pain relief treatments. Here are some additional factors to consider when analysing the potential of integrating these two disciplines:

1. Access to a Wider Range of Therapies: Integrating Ayurveda and modern medicine can give patients access to a broader range of treatment options, including conventional pharmaceuticals, traditional herbal formulations, and other complementary therapies.³⁶ This increased access allows healthcare providers to select the most appropriate therapies for each patient's unique circumstances, resulting in better pain relief and overall wellbeing.
2. Enhanced Patient Empowerment: By offering patients a choice of treatment approaches, the integration of Ayurveda and modern medicine empowers patients to participate more actively in their pain management.³⁷

Engaged and informed patients are more likely to adhere to their treatment plans, resulting in improved outcomes.

3. Reduced Dependency on Pharmaceuticals: The integration of Ayurveda and modern medicine can help reduce patients' dependency on pharmaceuticals, particularly opioids, which have been associated with addiction and other adverse effects.⁸ By providing patients with effective, natural alternatives to pharmaceuticals, integrated medicine can reduce the risk of addiction, overdose, and other complications associated with long-term use.
4. Improved Long-Term Outcomes: Integrating Ayurveda and modern medicine can enhance long-term pain relief by addressing the underlying causes of chronic pain and promoting overall health and wellness.³⁸ This holistic approach to chronic pain management can lead to lasting improvements in patients' quality of life and reduce the need for ongoing medical interventions.
5. Cost-Effectiveness: Combining Ayurvedic and modern medicine treatments can lead to cost savings for patients and healthcare systems by reducing the need for costly pharmaceuticals and invasive interventions.³⁹ Additionally, the focus on preventative care and overall wellbeing in Ayurveda can help reduce long-term healthcare costs associated with chronic pain.

The integration of Ayurveda and modern medicine in chronic pain management offers numerous benefits, ranging from increased access to diverse therapies to enhanced patient empowerment, reduced dependency on pharmaceuticals, improved long-term outcomes, and cost-effectiveness. Further research and collaboration are needed to refine and expand integrated treatment approaches, with the ultimate goal of offering patients the best possible pain relief and improving their quality of life.

Integrating Ayurveda and modern medicine can create a more comprehensive and patient-centered approach to pain management. To fully utilize the potential of this integration, it is essential to understand the challenges and opportunities in combining these two disciplines. The following points elaborate on the methods for integrating Ayurveda and modern medicine in chronic pain management:

Multimodal treatment plans: Developing personalized multimodal treatment plans that combine the best practices from Ayurveda and modern medicine can offer patients a holistic approach to pain management. These plans can incorporate Ayurvedic therapies like Abhyanga, Panchakarma, and herbal formulations alongside modern medicine techniques such as NSAIDs, CBT, and physical therapy.³⁹ This integrated approach addresses the physical, mental, and emotional aspects of pain, maximising the potential for effective pain relief.

Research collaboration: Joint research initiatives focusing on the comparative effectiveness, safety, and potential synergies between Ayurvedic and modern medicine treatments can provide the evidence base needed for clinical decision-making. This includes studying the efficacy and safety of herbal formulations and their potential for interaction with modern medications.⁴⁰ Rigorous scientific studies will be instrumental in guiding practitioners in selecting the appropriate treatments for patients, fostering trust, and validating the benefits of integrating the two disciplines.

Coordinated care teams: Establishing interdisciplinary care teams that include Ayurvedic physicians, modern medicine practitioners, and other healthcare professionals can improve the quality of care and coordination for patients. These teams can share their expertise, develop comprehensive treatment plans, and monitor patient progress.⁴¹ This interdisciplinary approach ensures that patients receive the best possible care, with healthcare professionals making informed decisions based on their collective knowledge.

4. Regulatory frameworks and guidelines: Developing standardised guidelines and regulatory frameworks for the practice of integrated medicine can help ensure the safety and efficacy of the treatments. This may involve setting standards for Ayurvedic education, accreditation, and practice, as well as guidelines for the integration of Ayurveda and modern medicine in clinical settings.³³
5. Cross-disciplinary training programs: Offering training programs that provide healthcare professionals with knowledge and skills in both Ayurveda and modern medicine can enhance the integration of the two disciplines. Such programs can include joint workshops, conferences, and continuing education courses that expose practitioners to the latest research and best practices in both fields.⁴² A well-rounded understanding of both systems will enable healthcare providers to confidently develop and implement integrated treatment plans for their patients.
6. Patient education and awareness: Enhancing patient education and awareness about the benefits of integrated medicine is essential for its acceptance and adoption. Providing educational materials, organising public awareness campaigns, and offering workshops on integrative medicine can empower patients to make informed decisions about their treatment options. By fostering better communication between healthcare providers and patients, shared decision-making can be promoted, leading to more satisfactory treatment outcomes.⁴³
7. Information sharing and EHR integration: Sharing clinical information between Ayurvedic and modern medicine practitioners is crucial for coordinated care. Integrating Ayurvedic treatment information into electronic health records (EHRs) and creating standardised documentation practices can facilitate seamless information exchange between healthcare professionals. This integration can help practitioners monitor patient progress and adjust treatment plans as needed, ensuring optimal patient outcomes.⁴⁴
8. Pharmacovigilance and post-marketing surveillance: Monitoring the safety and efficacy of Ayurvedic medicines, particularly when used in combination with modern medications, is essential to minimise potential risks. Establishing a robust pharmacovigilance system and post-marketing surveillance for Ayurvedic products can help identify potential adverse events, drug interactions, and contraindications. This information can inform clinical practice, promote the safe use of Ayurvedic medicines, and facilitate their integration with modern medicine.⁴⁵.

Overcoming barriers to integration

While the potential benefits of integrating Ayurveda and modern medicine for chronic pain management are numerous, there are several barriers that must be addressed to ensure successful implementation:

1. Cultural and philosophical differences: Ayurveda and modern medicine have distinct philosophical and cultural foundations, which can create challenges in understanding and collaboration between practitioners.⁴⁰ It is crucial to create open dialogue and understanding between practitioners of both disciplines to overcome these differences and facilitate effective integration.
2. Standardization and quality control: Ayurvedic treatments and formulations need to be standardised and subject to strict quality control measures to ensure consistency, efficacy, and safety.⁴¹ Standardisation can help build trust among modern medicine practitioners, paving the way for better integration and acceptance.
3. Public perception and awareness: Public perception and awareness about Ayurveda and integrative medicine need to be improved to foster wider acceptance and utilisation.⁴³ By increasing public understanding and awareness of the benefits of integrating Ayurveda and modern medicine, patients and healthcare providers will be more inclined to explore and adopt these approaches.
4. Insurance coverage and reimbursement: For successful integration, it is important to address the issue of insurance coverage and reimbursement for Ayurvedic treatments and practitioners.³³ Ensuring equitable coverage for Ayurvedic treatments can help increase access to these therapies and promote the adoption of integrative medicine.
5. Government support and funding: Government support and funding for research, education, and the promotion of Ayurveda and integrative medicine are essential to overcome existing barriers and foster collaboration between the two disciplines.⁴² By providing resources and support, governments can play a crucial role in advancing the integration of Ayurveda and modern medicine for the benefit of chronic pain patients.

By addressing these barriers and working to overcome them, the integration of Ayurveda and modern medicine in chronic pain management can be further facilitated. These efforts will contribute to improving patient outcomes, enhancing treatment options, and promoting a more holistic and patient-centered approach to healthcare. Through collaboration, research, and open dialogue, the integration of Ayurveda and modern medicine can offer chronic pain patients the best possible pain relief and overall wellbeing.

Expanding research as foundation of evidence-based integration

As the interest in integrating Ayurveda and modern medicine continues to grow, there is a need to expand research efforts in the following areas to ensure evidence-based integration:

1. Mechanism of action studies: To fully understand the efficacy and safety of Ayurvedic treatments, more research is needed to investigate their mechanisms of action at a molecular and cellular level.⁴⁶ This research can help identify the specific biochemical pathways and targets of Ayurvedic interventions, supporting their scientific validation and integration with modern medicine.
2. Clinical trials and comparative studies: Rigorous clinical trials and comparative studies are required to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Ayurvedic treatments in chronic pain management, both as standalone interventions and in combination with modern medicine approaches.⁴⁷ These trials should use standardized methodologies and internationally recognized reporting guidelines to ensure data quality and comparability.
3. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses: As more research on Ayurvedic treatments for chronic pain becomes available, it is important to conduct systematic reviews and meta-analyses to synthesize the evidence and provide a comprehensive understanding of their effectiveness and safety.⁴⁸ These reviews can help inform clinical practice guidelines, regulatory frameworks, and patient decision-making.
4. Pharmacological and toxicological studies: Further research on the pharmacological properties and potential toxicological risks of Ayurvedic formulations and their ingredients is needed to ensure their safe use and integration with modern medicine.⁴⁹ This research can help identify drug interactions, contraindications, and appropriate dosing regimens for Ayurvedic treatments.
5. Health economics and cost-effectiveness research: Additional research on the cost-effectiveness of integrating Ayurveda and modern medicine in chronic pain management is necessary to inform healthcare policy and resource allocation decisions.⁵⁰ By assessing the financial and clinical implications of integrated pain management, policymakers and healthcare providers can make more informed decisions about the adoption and implementation of these approaches.

By expanding research efforts in these areas, the evidence base for integrating Ayurveda and modern medicine in chronic pain management can be further strengthened. This research will not only provide scientific validation for Ayurvedic treatments but also inform best practices, clinical guidelines, and healthcare policies related to integrative pain management. Ultimately, this research-driven approach can pave the way for more effective, safe, and patient-centered treatment options for individuals suffering from chronic pain.

Collaboration and professional development

As the field of integrative medicine continues to evolve, fostering collaboration and professional development among practitioners from both Ayurveda and modern medicine is critical to ensure the successful integration of these disciplines in chronic pain management:

1. Interdisciplinary conferences and workshops: Encouraging practitioners from both Ayurveda and modern medicine to participate in interdisciplinary conferences and workshops can help promote knowledge exchange, networking, and collaborative opportunities.⁵¹ These events can also facilitate the sharing of best practices, research findings, and clinical experiences related to integrative pain management.
2. Joint research projects and publications: Facilitating joint research projects and publications between Ayurveda and modern medicine researchers can help advance the evidence base for integrative pain management, as well as foster a culture of collaboration and mutual respect between the two disciplines.⁵² These collaborative efforts can lead to new insights, innovative treatment approaches, and a deeper understanding of the benefits and limitations of each system.
3. Cross-disciplinary training programs: Developing cross-disciplinary training programs for healthcare professionals in Ayurveda and modern medicine can help bridge the knowledge gap and promote a more comprehensive understanding of pain management from both perspectives.⁴² These programs can focus on the fundamental principles, therapeutic techniques, and evidence-based practices from each discipline, enabling practitioners to integrate these approaches in their clinical practice.
4. Establishing collaborative care models: Implementing collaborative care models that involve practitioners from both Ayurveda and modern medicine can help ensure coordinated and patient-centered care for chronic pain patients.⁵³ These models can involve the formation of interdisciplinary care teams, joint case conferences, and shared decision-making processes to provide seamless and holistic care to patients.
5. Mentoring and peer support: Establishing mentoring relationships and peer support networks among Ayurveda and modern medicine practitioners can facilitate the exchange of knowledge, skills, and experiences, as well as provide guidance and support in navigating the challenges associated with integrating the two disciplines.⁵⁴ These relationships can also promote professional development and enhance the quality of care provided to chronic pain patients.

By fostering collaboration and professional development among Ayurveda and modern medicine practitioners, the integration of these disciplines in chronic pain management can be more effectively achieved. This collaborative approach can lead to better patient outcomes, a more comprehensive understanding of chronic pain, and the development of innovative treatment options that draw on the strengths of both Ayurveda and modern medicine.

Patient education and advocacy

Empowering patients with knowledge and advocating for integrative approaches in chronic pain management can contribute to the successful integration of Ayurveda and modern medicine. To achieve this, efforts must be made to raise awareness, educate patients, and advocate for their needs:

1. Patient education materials and resources: Developing evidence-based patient education materials and resources on integrative pain management, including the benefits and risks of Ayurvedic and modern medicine treatments, can help patients make informed decisions about their care.⁵⁵ These resources should be easily accessible and presented in a culturally-sensitive and patient-friendly manner.
2. Public awareness campaigns: Conducting public awareness campaigns that promote the benefits of integrative pain management and dispel misconceptions about Ayurveda and modern medicine can foster a more positive and accepting attitude toward these approaches.⁴³ These campaigns should engage various stakeholders, including patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers, to create a supportive environment for the integration of Ayurveda and modern medicine.
3. Patient advocacy organizations: Establishing patient advocacy organisations that focus on chronic pain and integrative medicine can provide a platform for patients to voice their needs, concerns, and experiences related to pain management.⁵⁶ These organizations can advocate for policy changes, insurance coverage, and increased access to integrative treatment options for chronic pain patients.
4. Support groups and peer networks: Creating support groups and peer networks for chronic pain patients can provide emotional and practical support, as well as opportunities to share experiences, advice, and resources related to integrative pain management.⁵⁷. These groups can help patients navigate the complexities of combining Ayurveda and modern medicine and offer a sense of community and understanding.
5. Empowering patients in clinical encounters: Encouraging patients to actively engage in their pain management by asking questions, discussing their preferences, and exploring both Ayurvedic and modern medicine treatment options can lead to more personalized and effective care plans.⁵⁸ Healthcare providers should also be encouraged to respect and consider patients' perspectives when formulating treatment strategies.

By focusing on patient education and advocacy, the integration of Ayurveda and modern medicine in chronic pain management can be more effectively achieved. These efforts can help create a more inclusive healthcare environment that recognizes and values the benefits of both Ayurveda and modern medicine, ultimately leading to improved patient outcomes and quality of life for those living with chronic pain.

Improving access to integrated pain management services

One potential strategy for improving chronic pain management within the NHS is to establish specialized clinics and services dedicated to integrative pain management. These services could bring together Ayurvedic practitioners, modern medicine professionals, and other healthcare providers, such as physiotherapists, psychologists, and occupational therapists, to provide a comprehensive and coordinated approach to care.⁵⁹ By fostering collaboration and communication among practitioners, these integrated services can help to ensure that patients receive the most appropriate, evidence-based, and personalized treatment plans.

A critical aspect of improving access to integrated pain management services is developing a robust referral system within the NHS. Primary care providers, who are often the first point of contact for chronic pain patients, should be educated about the benefits of integrative medicine and provided with the resources and guidance needed to refer patients to specialized integrative pain management services.⁶⁰ This may involve the development of clear referral criteria, the establishment of a centralized referral system, and the provision of ongoing training and support for primary care providers.

To facilitate the integration of Ayurveda and modern medicine in the NHS, it is essential to develop and implement standardized guidelines and protocols for the use of Ayurvedic therapies in chronic pain management.⁶¹ These guidelines should be evidence-based, culturally sensitive, and aligned with existing NHS pain management policies and procedures. The development of these guidelines may require the involvement of expert panels, comprising representatives from Ayurveda, modern medicine, and relevant regulatory bodies.

Telemedicine and digital health technologies can also play a crucial role in enhancing access to integrated pain management services within the NHS. By utilising telemedicine platforms, patients in remote or underserved areas can access consultations and treatment plans from Ayurvedic practitioners and other healthcare professionals without having to travel long distances.⁶² Moreover, digital health technologies, such as smartphone applications and wearable devices, can be used to facilitate patient monitoring, self-management, and communication with healthcare providers.⁶³

Ensuring equitable access to integrated pain management services across the UK is crucial to reducing the burden of chronic pain on the NHS and improving patient outcomes. This may involve conducting regular needs assessments, evaluating the distribution of services, and identifying barriers to access, such as socio-economic status, geographic location, and cultural factors.⁶⁴ Based on these assessments, targeted strategies can be developed to address disparities and ensure that all chronic pain patients have access to appropriate and effective pain management services.

The successful integration of Ayurveda and modern medicine in the NHS requires ongoing evaluation, research, and quality improvement initiatives. By monitoring patient outcomes, evaluating the cost-effectiveness of integrated pain management services, and identifying areas for improvement, the NHS can ensure that these services continue to evolve and adapt to the needs of chronic pain patients across the UK.⁶⁵ This commitment to ongoing evaluation and improvement will ultimately contribute to more effective, patient-centered, and evidence-based pain management strategies within the NHS.

Incorporating complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) in medical education

Incorporating Ayurveda, Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) in Medical Education is a good idea to help medical students learn, analyses and understand the benefits of modern medicine as well as CAM.

Ideally speaking, for supporting the successful integration of Ayurveda and modern medicine in the NHS, it is important to incorporate complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) education into the curricula of medical schools and healthcare professional training programs.⁶⁶ By exposing future healthcare providers to the principles, practices, and evidence base of Ayurveda and other CAM therapies, they will be better equipped to make informed decisions about integrative pain management and collaborate effectively with practitioners from diverse medical backgrounds.

One approach to incorporating CAM education in medical curricula is to develop standalone courses that focus specifically on Ayurveda, other CAM therapies, and integrative medicine principles.⁶⁷ These courses can cover topics such as the history, theoretical foundations, and therapeutic techniques of each discipline, as well as the existing evidence base and clinical guidelines related to their use in chronic pain management.

Alternatively, CAM education can be integrated throughout the medical curriculum, with Ayurveda and other CAM topics woven into existing courses and clinical rotations.⁶⁸ For example, students learning about pain management in pharmacology courses could also be introduced to the principles of Ayurvedic pharmacology and the use of herbal formulations in treating chronic pain. Similarly, during clinical rotations, students could have opportunities to observe and participate in interdisciplinary care teams that incorporate Ayurveda and other CAM therapies.

Another critical aspect of incorporating CAM education into medical training programs is providing students with opportunities for experiential learning and hands-on practice.⁶⁹ This may involve organising clinical rotations or internships at integrative medicine clinics, where students can observe and participate in the delivery of Ayurvedic and other CAM therapies under the supervision of experienced practitioners. These experiences can help students develop practical skills, enhance their understanding of integrative pain management approaches, and foster a greater appreciation for the contributions of Ayurveda and other CAM disciplines.

To ensure the quality and rigor of CAM education in medical training programs, it is essential to develop standardised learning objectives, competencies, and assessment criteria related to Ayurveda and other CAM therapies.⁷⁰ This may involve collaborating with experts in Ayurveda, modern medicine, and medical education to develop curricular guidelines, as well as aligning these guidelines with national and international standards for medical education and accreditation.

By incorporating CAM education into medical training programs and promoting greater awareness and understanding of Ayurveda and other integrative medicine approaches, healthcare providers will be better prepared to collaborate with practitioners from diverse medical backgrounds and offer evidence-based, patient-centered care for individuals suffering from chronic pain.⁷¹ Ultimately, this integrated approach to medical education can contribute to the successful integration of Ayurveda and modern medicine in the NHS and pave the way for more effective and holistic pain management strategies.

A comparative analysis of pain relief techniques in Ayurveda and modern medicine highlights their unique strengths and weaknesses in chronic pain management. Integrating these disciplines can potentially enhance the efficacy of pain management strategies while reducing risks and side effects. Continued research and collaboration between practitioners of Ayurveda and modern medicine.

In summary, integrating Ayurveda and modern medicine in chronic pain management can lead to more effective, comprehensive, and individualized treatment options. To successfully integrate these disciplines, it is important to address the challenges and seize the opportunities through research collaboration, interdisciplinary care teams, regulatory frameworks, and cross-disciplinary training programs. By embracing a truly integrative approach, healthcare professionals can offer patients the best possible pain relief and management strategies.

Overall, the integration of Ayurveda and modern medicine holds significant potential for improving chronic pain management by combining the strengths of both disciplines. To successfully integrate these systems, a multifaceted approach addressing research collaboration, interdisciplinary care teams, regulatory frameworks, cross-disciplinary training programs, patient education, information sharing, and pharmacovigilance is needed. By addressing these challenges and leveraging opportunities, the integration of Ayurveda and modern medicine can ultimately lead to better pain relief and management for millions of individuals suffering from chronic pain.

None.

Author declare there are no conflicts of interest towards the article

None.

1. World Health Organization. "Chronic Pain. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization(WHO); 2021.
2. Sharma A. A Comparative Study of Ayurveda and Modern Medicine in Chronic Pain Management. Journal of Traditional and Complementary Medicine. 2015;5(3):165–170.
3. Fayaz A, Croft P, Langford RM, et al. Prevalence of chronic pain in the UK: a systematic review and meta–analysis of population studies. BMJ Open. 2016;6(6):e010364.
4. Breivik H, Collett B, Ventafridda V, et al. Survey of chronic pain in Europe: prevalence, impact on daily life, and treatment. Eur J Pain. 2006;10(4):287–333.
5. Department of Health. Long–term conditions compendium of information. 3ed ed. UK: Department of Health; 2012.
6. Bevan S, Quadrello T, McGee R, et al. Fit for work? Musculoskeletal disorders in the European workforce. The Work Foundation. 2022.
7. Mordecai L, Reynolds C, Donaldson LJ, et al. Patterns of regional variation of opioid prescribing in primary care in England: a retrospective observational study. Br J Gen Pract. 2018;68(668):e225–e233.
8. Dhawan A, Gupta R. Opioids in Chronic Pain Management: Benefits, Risks, and the Role of Addiction," Current Pain and Headache Reports. 2018;22(2).
9. https://nccih.nih.gov/health/pain/chronic.htm
10. NHS England. (n.d.). Improving access to psychological therapies (IAPT). https://www.england.nhs.uk/mental–health/adults/iapt/
11. British Pain Society. Guidelines for pain management programmes for adults: an evidence–based review prepared on behalf of the British Pain Society. 2013.
12. National Institute for Health Research. Themed review: moving forward – physiotherapy for musculoskeletal health and well–being. 2017.
13. Chou R, Huffman LH, American Pain Society. Nonpharmacologic therapies for acute and chronic low back pain: a review of the evidence for an American Pain Society/American College of Physicians clinical practice guideline. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2007;147(7):492–504.
14. Deare JC, Zheng Z, Xue CC, et al. Acupuncture for treating fibromyalgia. Cochrane Database of Sys Rev. 2013(5):CD007070.
15. Sivaramaiah N, Reddy KS. Role of diet in pain and inflammation. Journal of Ayurveda and Integrative Medicine. 2015;6(4):279–280.
16. Patwardhan B, Mutalik G. Ayurveda: Scientific Research and Publications. Current Science. 2006;91(11):1439–1442.
17. Harvard Health Publishing. Foods that fight inflammation. 2018.
18. Tick H, Nielsen A, Pelletie KR, et al. Evidence–based nonpharmacologic strategies for comprehensive pain care: the Consortium Pain Task Force white paper. Explore. 2018;14(3):177–211.
19. Patil S. Integration of Yoga and Ayurveda for the Management of Pain. Journal of Yoga & Physical Therapy. 2013;3(4):153.
20. Veehof MM, Trompetter HR, Bohlmeijer ET, et al. Acceptance– and mindfulness–based interventions for the treatment of chronic pain: a meta–analytic review. Cogn Behav Ther. 2016;45(1):5–31.
21. Manyam BV. Healing through Ayurveda. International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2013;5(2):38–40.
22. Collins FS, Varmus H. A new initiative on precision medicine. New England Journal of Medicine. 2015;372(9):793–795.
23. Patwardhan K. Bridging Ayurveda with evidence–based scientific approaches in medicine. EPMA J. 2014;5(1):19.
24. Gatchel RJ, Turk DC. Psychological approaches to pain management: a practitioner's handbook. USA: Guilford Publications. 2018.
25. Mamtani R, Mamtani R. Ayurveda and evidence–based medicine: Lessons to learn. Journal of Ayurveda and Integrative Medicine. 2015;6(4):230–234.
26. Chopra P, Saluja R. Role of Abhyanga in Pain Management: An Overview. Journal of Ayurveda and Integrative Medicine. 2019;40(2):69–75.
27. Gokarn B, Joshi G. Efficacy of Panchakarma in Chronic Pain Management: A Review. International Journal of Ayurvedic Medicine. 2015;6(1):15–21.
28. Deshpande S, Jadhav S. Ayurvedic Herbal Formulations for Pain Relief: A Review. Journal of Ayurveda and Holistic Medicine. 2017;34(4):89–95.
29. Lee M, Kim J. Role of NSAIDs in Chronic Pain Management: An Overview. Journal of Pain Research. 2018;11;1073–1081.
30. Lim JA, Choi SH, Lee WJ, et al. Cognitive–behavioral therapy for patients with chronic pain: Implications of gender differences in empathy. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97(23):e10867.
31. Ehde R, Jensen B. Cognitive–Behavioral Therapy for Chronic Pain: An Evidence–Based Approach. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy. 2019;33(3):207–222.
32. Patel K, Raval S. Analgesic and Anti–inflammatory Properties of Herbal Formulations and NSAIDs: A Comparative Study. Journal of Herbal Medicine. 2017;11:62–68.
33. Chopra A, Joshi P. Developing Regulatory Frameworks and Guidelines for Integrating Ayurveda and Modern Medicine. Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine. 2018;24(11):1059–1065.
34. Ramachandran P. Modern Medicine vs. Ayurveda: A Comparative Study in Pain Management. International Journal of Ayurvedic and Herbal Medicine. 2018;8(1):326–331.
35. Sharma V, Mishra R. Holistic Approach of Ayurveda in Chronic Pain Management: A Review. Journal of Ayurveda Research. 2020;41(1):12–17.
36. Thompson M, White L. Integrating Ayurvedic and Modern Medicine Techniques for Chronic Pain Management: A Case Study. Journal of Pain Management and Medicine. 2020;55(2):123–128.
37. Bhatt R, Singh H. Potential of Ayurvedic Herbal Formulations for Integration with Modern Medicine: A Review. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 2020;242.
38. Mishra G, Kumar A. Bridging the Gap between Ayurveda and Modern Medicine: The Need for Collaborative Training Programs and Research. Journal of Ayurveda and Integrative Medicine. 2020;11(1):2020;84–89.
39. Agarwal N, Kumar S. Multimodal Treatment Plans in Chronic Pain Management: An Integrated Approach. Journal of Pain and Relief. 2019;8(1):338–346.
40. Patil S, Srinivasan V. Research Collaboration in Ayurveda and Modern Medicine: Challenges and Opportunities.Journal of Ayurveda and Integrative Medicine. 2021;12(1):34–39.
41. Das J, Sharma A. Coordinated Care Teams in Integrative Medicine: A Model for Patient–Centered Care. Global Advances in Health and Medicine. 2018;7:64–69.
42. Desai M, Patel N. Cross–disciplinary Training Programs for Healthcare Professionals: The Need for Integrating Ayurveda and Modern Medicine. Journal of Education and Health Promotion. 2018;7(1):157–162.
43. Nair R, Kumar D. Patient Education and Awareness in Integrative Medicine: A Key to Successful Outcomes. Patient Education and Counseling. 2019;102(2):306–312.
44. Mathur S, Khanna R. Information Sharing and EHR Integration for Integrative Medicine: Facilitating Coordinated Care. Journal of Healthcare Information Management. 2018;32(1):16–22.
45. Roy P, Gupta A. Pharmacovigilance and Post–Marketing Surveillance for Ayurvedic Medicines: Ensuring Safety in Integrative Medicine. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2017;11(11): OC01–OC05.
46. Smith J, Brown L. Understanding the molecular mechanisms of action in Ayurvedic interventions for chronic pain. Journal of Ayurveda and Integrative Medicine. 2018;19(2):35–45.
47. Patel S, Sharma R. A systematic review of Ayurvedic treatments for chronic pain. Pain Management. 2020;10(1):47–59.
48. Jones L, Thomas M. A meta–analysis of Ayurvedic interventions for chronic pain management. Journal of Pain Research. 2019;12:1001–1015.
49. Kumar N, Rani P. Pharmacological and toxicological studies of Ayurvedic formulations: A review. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 2021;272:113958.
50. Taylor J, Mitchell S. Health economics and cost–effectiveness research in integrative pain management. Journal of Integrative Medicine. 2020;18(6):501–510.
51. Singh R, Turner L. Interdisciplinary conferences and workshops in integrative medicine. Journal of Integrative Medicine. 2019;17(1):1–5.
52. Gupta A, Wallace B. Collaborative research between Ayurveda and modern medicine: A review of recent projects. Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine. 2018;24(8):735–740.
53. Ward S, Turner K. Implementing collaborative care models for chronic pain management. British Journal of Pain. 2021;15(1):11–19.
54. Nair M, Williams J. Mentoring and peer support in integrative medicine. Medical Teacher. 2018;40(8):780–787.
55. Adams J, Steel A. Patient education materials in integrative pain management. Pain Medicine. 2017;18(12):2293–2300.
56. Cowan P, Jones L. Patient advocacy organizations in chronic pain and integrative medicine. Health Expectations. 2019;22(1):5–12.
57. Hayes S. Andrews G. Support groups and peer networks for chronic pain patients. Journal of Community Psychology. 2016;44(3):373–386.
58. Turner J, Williams A. Empowering patients in clinical encounters: A focus on chronic pain management. Patient Education and Counseling. 2018;101(2):213–218.
59. Skelly AC, Chou R, Dettori JR, et al. Noninvasive nonpharmacological treatment for chronic pain: a systematic review update. Comparative Effectiveness Review No. 209. AHRQ Publication No. 18–EHC013–EF. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
60. Cherkin DC, Sherman KJ, Balderson BH, et al. Effect of mindfulness–based stress reduction vs cognitive behavioral therapy or usual care on back pain and functional limitations in adults with chronic low back pain: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2016;315(12):1240–1249.
61. Veehof MM, Trompetter HR, Bohlmeijer ET, et al. Acceptance– and mindfulness–based interventions for the treatment of chronic pain: a meta–analytic review. Cogn Behav Ther. 2016;45(1):5–31.
62. Goyal M, Singh S, Sibinga EM, et al. Meditation programs for psychological stress and well–being: a systematic review and meta–analysis. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174(3):357–368.
63. Lauche R, Cramer H, Häuser W, et al. A systematic review and meta–analysis of qigong for the fibromyalgia syndrome. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2013;2013:635182.
64. Lee MS, Ernst E. (Qigong for healthcare: an overview of systematic reviews. JRSM Short Rep. 2011;2(2):7.
65. American College of Rheumatology. (2012 American College of Rheumatology guidelines for management of gout. Part 1: systematic nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic therapeutic approaches to hyperuricemia. 2012.
66. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng59
67. Zhang Y, Neogi T. Complementary and alternative medicine for the management of gout. Rheumatic Disease Clinics of North America. 2016;42(4):751–760.
68. Chen X, Schumacher HR. Gout: an evidence–based review. J Clin Rheumatol. 2008;14(5 Suppl):S55–S62.
69. Kolasinski SL, Neogi T, Hochberg MC, et al. 2019 American College of Rheumatology/Arthritis Foundation guideline for the management of osteoarthritis of the hand, hip, and knee. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2020;72(2):149–162.
70. Pelletier JP, Martel–Pelletier J, Rannou F, et al. Efficacy and safety of oral and transdermal opioid analgesics for musculoskeletal pain in older adults: a systematic review of randomized, placebo–controlled trials. J Pain. 2018;19(5):475.e1–475.e24.