Submit manuscript...
eISSN: 2373-6372

Gastroenterology & Hepatology: Open Access

Research Article Volume 13 Issue 6

The outcome of acute pancreatitis patients with acute kidney injury- Single centre study from North India

Piyush Mathur

Department of Nephrologist, Santokba Durlabhji Memorial Hospital, India

Correspondence: Piyush Mathur, Consultant Nephrologist, Santokba Durlabhji Memorial Hospital, Jaipur, India, Tel +917023333189

Received: August 22, 2022 | Published: November 4, 2022

Citation: Mathur P. The outcome of acute pancreatitis patients with acute kidney injury- Single centre study from North India. Gastroenterol Hepatol Open Access. 2022;13(6):194-198. DOI: 10.15406/ghoa.2022.13.00522

Download PDF

Abstract

Introduction: Acute Pancreatitis (AP) results in 100,000 hospitalizations per year and the incidence of acute pancreatitis ranges from 13 to 45 per 100,000 population-years. Eighty percent of cases of AP are interstitial and mild; the remaining 20% to 30% are necrotizing and severe with hospital mortality rates of 15%.1 Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common serious complication of AP and an important marker of morbidity and mortality in critically ill patients. The prognosis of AP patients with AKI is extremely poor with mortality rates ranging between 25-75%.2,3

Methodology: Study type and design: observational, cross sectional study, single centre study. The main source of data for the study was collected from patients with AP admitted in Department of General Medicine and Gastroenterology department of Santokba Durlabhji Memorial Hospital, Jaipur, India.

Results: AKI was found in 27 out of total 144 study subject resulting in an incidence of 18.75% in our study. Mean age of patients who developed AKI was significantly higher when compared to patients without AKI with significant p value. In our study, we found that high BMI and high SOFA score at admission were risk factors for AKI. Patients of AP with AKI had longer average hospital stay and ICU stay when compared to patients without AKI. We also found high mortality in AP patients who developed AKI had (48.15% Vs 1.71%) as compared to patients of AP without AKI.

Conclusion: From current study we can conclude that, AKI is a serious complication of AP and leads to a poor outcome. 

Keywords: Acute kidney injury, severe acute pancreatitis, mortality

Abbreviations

AP, acute pancreatitis; AKI, acute kidney injury; SAP, severe acute pancreatitis; CBC, complete blood counts; CKD, chronic kidney disease; NIV, non invasive ventilation, CAD, coronary artery disease; CLD, chronic liver disease; COPD, , chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; SOFA, Sequential Organ failure assessment

Introduction

Acute pancreatitis (AP) is defined as an acute inflammatory process of the pancreas with variable involvement of other regional tissues or remote organ systems. According to JPN criteria 2002,4 AP is best diagnosed clinically by a patient presenting with two of the following criteria:

  1. Acute abdominal pain and tenderness in the upper abdomen;
  2. Elevated pancreatic enzyme levels in serum, urine or ascitic fluid; and
  3. Ultrasonographic (US) or radiologic abnormalities characteristic of AP

Worldwide, the incidence of acute pancreatitis ranges between 20 and 80 per 100,000 populations.5,6 Pathologically, AP varies from mild interstitial pancreatitis, which is generally self-limited to severe necrotizing pancreatitis, in which the extent of necrosis may correlate with the severity of the attack and its systemic complications.

The courses of most AP cases are auto- restricted, but about 20%-30%7 of all patients develops severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) and may become worse, due to development of multiple organ malfunctions or local complications like necrosis, pseudocyst and abscess. The inception of SAP is hazardous with relatively high mortality estimated as from 7% to 47%.8–10 One common complication of SAP in critically ill patients is acute kidney injury (AKI). The mortality in SAP with AKI is 10 fold higher as compared to patients without AKI. 2,11–13 The exact mechanism of AKI in patients with AP is complex and not very well understood. Different key pathophysiologic processes include release of pancreatic enzymes with resulting impairment of renal microcirculation, hypoxemia, hypovolemia, intra-abdominal hypertension, endotoxin and cytokines mediated injury.

The aim of our study is to access the risk factors for the development of AKI in patients of AP, and the disease spectrum and outcome of such patients.

AIM of the Study

The aim of our study is to access the risk factors for the development of AKI in patients of AP, and the disease spectrum and outcome of such patients.

Material and methods

Study type and design: This is observational, cross sectional, single centre study.

Study population: The diagnosed patients of AP admitted in the department of General Medicine and department of Gastroenterology at Santokba Durlabhji Memorial Hospital, Jaipur, India were included in the study.

The patients were followed till discharge or death.

Inclusion criteria

All patients above 18years of age admitted in ward/ICU with first episode of acute pancreatitis with AKI at admission or developed during hospital stay were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria

  1. Patients not willing to give consent for the study.
  2. Patients of chronic pancreatitis.
  3. Patients of recurrent pancreatitis.
  4. Patients having malignancy.

Study period: 2years

Method of data collection

After obtaining informed written consent from the patient, detailed thorough general and systemic examination was carried out. Reports of all relevant laboratory and radiological investigation were generated and procured. All information & data thus generated was recorded on a pre-designed study proforma. Separate proforma was used for each patient and was used to prepare master chart.

Methodology

After giving full explanation regarding the study, patients were requested to give written informed consent. Once the eligibility was verified a detailed history and thorough clinical examination including vitals, general physical examination, systemic examination and investigations were carried out.

AP was diagnosed based on JPN criteria 2002.4 Etiology of AP was studied in each patient on the basis of history given by patient, evidence of gall stones by radiological investigations like Ultrasonography, CT scan etc. and laboratory investigations like serum calcium, triglycerides etc. The severity of the AP was assessed according to Modified Atlanta Classification.14  Investigations like Complete Blood Counts (CBC), liver function tests (serum bilirubin, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, PT, INR, serum albumin), serum creatinine, Serum electrolytes, serum amylase, lipase were carried out. Local complications of AP like fluid collection, pseudocyst, necrosis, WOPN etc. were studied in each patient. Sequential Organ failure assessment score (SOFA) was calculated for each patient at admission (Figure 1).15 AKI was defined as per AKIN criteria and once AKI was diagnosed, patients were further categorized to various stages of AKI by measuring Serum creatinine and Urine output of each patient according to AKIN criteria (Figure 2).16 Patients having AKI were labeled as having stage I, II or III based on AKIN criteria. The worst value of S.creatinine was taken to stage AKI. For those patients requiring RRT number of days the patient was on RRT, the modality of RRT utilized (HD, SLED, CRRT etc.)  and the status of renal recovery at the time of discharge were studied by recording serum creatinine and urine output. Risk factors for the development of AKI in these patients e.g. smoking, alcohol, pre-existing renal disease, hypoxemia, sepsis, abdominal ascites etc. were studied in detail. Extra renal involvement, duration of hospital stay, duration of ICU stay and complete course of treatment throughout admission in each of these patients were studied.

Figure 1 SOFA score

Stages

Serum creatinine criteria

Urine output

Stage 1     

Increase in serum creatinine >O.3mcVd1 (È26Alm01/1) or
increase to ÈI 50% to 200% (1.5 fold to 2 fold) from baseline

<0.5 ml/kg/h for >6 h

Stage 2

Increase to >200% to 300% (2 fold to 3 fold) from baseline       

for <0.5 ml/kg/h for  >12h

Stage 3

Increase in serum creatinine to
>300% (>3 fold) from baseline, or serum creatinine >4.0mg/dl  (È354ktmol/1) with acute increase 12 hours of atleast 0.5m dl

<0.3m1/kg/hr for 24 hours, or anuria for 12 hours

Figure 2 AKIN criteria

Statistical analysis

Continuous data will be presented as mean and standard deviation whereas categorical data will be presented as number, percentages. Student T Test will be applied for continuous data whereas Fischer’s exact test will be applied for categorical data appropriately. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, likelihood ratio for positive test result and negative test result was calculated as per standard formulae. P-value less than 0.05 were taken as significant. Medcalc. Software was used for all statistical analysis.

Observations and results

A total of 144 patients with AP were included in our study and out of these 27 patients (18.75%) developed AKI. Out of total 144 patients, 76.39% (n=110) were male and 23.61% (n=34) were female. Out of the total 27 patients with AKI, 77.78% (n=21) were male and 22.22% (n=6) were female. Mean age of patients who developed AKI was 50.48±20.45 which was significantly higher when compared to patients without AKI (40.97±16.13) with a P value of 0.009.

We observed that BMI of AP patients, who developed AKI, was higher (24.56±3.08kg/m2)   when compared to patients without AKI (22.90±2.36kg/m2) with p value 0.002. In our study, AP patients who had higher SOFA score at admission had greater chance of developing AKI. The score was significantly higher in patients with AKI (5.11±2.93) compared to patients without AKI (0.85±1.12) with p value of <0.001.

Mean±standard deviation serum creatinine at admission in patients with AKI group was 3.53±3.11 while in non AKI group it was 0.73±0.20. Patients with AKI had lower urine output in first 24 hours (858.91ml±720.86 ml) compared to those who didn’t develop AKI (1775.56 ml±1249.61 ml).  Values of other laboratory parameters like amylase and lipase are given in Table 1.

Parameters

AKI (N= 27)

Non-AKI (N=117)

Total (N=144)

P value

Age

50.48±20.45

40.97 ±16.13

42.75±17.35

0.009

BMI

24.56±3.08

22.90±2.36

23.21± 2.58

0.002

SOFA score

5.11±2.93

0.85±1.12

 

<0.00

Serum Creatinine

3.53±3.11

0.73±0.20

 

 

Urine Output

858.91±720.86

1775.56±1249.61

 

0.04

Amylase

1162.64±1772.39

1260.61±1494.97

1236.11±1558.80

0.80

Lipase

5784.59±10163.55

8088.54±10395.73

7512.56±10328.77

0.37

Co morbidities

 

 

 

 

DM
HTN
CAD
CLD
COPD

6 (22.22)
11 (40.74)
5 (18.52)
5 (18.52)
3 (11.11)

19 (16.24)
25 (21.37)
6 (5.13)
11 (9.40)
1 (0.85)

25 (17.36)
36 (25)
11(7.64)
16 (11.11)
4 (2.78)

0.57
0.04
0.03
0.18
0.02

Risk factors

 

 

 

 

Smoking
Alcohol
Hypoxemia
Pre existing CKD

3 (11.11)
11 (40.74)
19 (70.37)
6 (22.22)

18 (15.38)
40 (34.19)
7(5.98)
4 (3.42)

21 (14.58)
51 (35.42)
26 (18.06)
10 (6.94)

0.76
0.51
<0.001
0.003

Other associated factors

 

 

 

 

 

Pleural Effusion
Ascites
Sepsis
Shock

28 (19.58)
21 (14.69)
17 (11.89)
6 (4.20)

11 (40.74)
12 (44.44)
12 (44.44)
6 (22.22)

17 (14.66)
9 (7.76)
5 (4.31)
0 (0)

0.005
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001

 

Hospital stay (Days)

12.22±8.60

8.41±5.87

9.13±6.60

0.006

ICU stay (Days)

8.07±8.99

1.74±4.31

2.93±5.99

<0.001

Mortality

13 (48.15)

2 (1.71)

15 (10.42)

<0.001

Table 1 Demography and laboratory data

Presence of associated co morbidities like diabetes, coronary artery disease (CAD), chronic liver disease (CLD), hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) did not make any significant impact on development of AKI in our study as evident from Table 1. Also traditional risk factors like smoking and alcohol were not associated with development of AKI in patients with AP.  However, presence of hypoxemia (p value 0.001) requiring noninvasive ventilation (NIV) or mechanical ventilation at admission and preexisting chronic kidney disease (CKD) (p value 0.003) had significant impact on development of AKI in patients with AP which was statistically significant.

In our study, AP with AKI had significant impact on overall outcome of patients in terms of longer hospital & ICU stay and mortality. Patients of AP with AKI had average hospital stay of 12.22±8.60 days Vs 8.41±5.87 in non AKI patients. ICU stay in AKI group (8.07±8.99) was also longer when compared to non AKI group (1.74±4.31). AP patients who developed AKI had significantly high mortality (48.15% Vs 1.71%) as compared to patients of AP without AKI.

In our study, we found that presence of possible reasons of abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) (third spacing of fluid) in terms of pleural effusion (p-value=0.005) and ascites (p-value <0.001) were associated with AKI. AP patients who developed sepsis (p-value <0.001) and shock (p-value <0.001) were associated with AKI.

Etiology of AP had no correlation with development of AKI in our study (Table 2). Similarly complications of AP were no different in both the groups. But, severity of AP was associated with higher incidence of AKI. It was observed in our study that 35 patients (24.31%) out of 144 developed severe AP. Only 10 % patients developed AKI in patients with mild to moderately severe AP while nearly 50% patients had AKI in patients with SAP. Conversely, those who had AKI, nearly 63% (17 out of 27)  had severe AP while SAP was only 15% (18 out of 117) in non AKI group (Table 2).

S. No

Characteristics of AP

Total (N=144)

AKI (N=27)

Non-AKI (N=117)

P value

1.

Etiology of AP

 

 

 

 

 

Alcohol
Biliary
Unknown
Others

51 (35.42)
39 (27.08)
45 (31.25)
9 (6.25)

12 (44.44)
6 (22.22)
5 (18.52)
4 (14.81)

39 (33.33)
33 (28.21)
40 (34.19)
5 (4.27)

 

0.08

2.

Severity of AP

 

 

 

 

 

Mild AP
Moderately Severe AP
Severe AP

71 (49.31)
38 (26.39)
35 (24.31)

8 (11.26)
2 (5.26)
17 (48.57)

63 (88.74)
36 (94.74)
18 (51.42)

 

<0.001

3.

Complications of AP

 

 

 

 

 

Collection
Pseudocyst
Necrosis
Cholelithiasis
Choledocholithiasis
WOPN
Cholecystitis

28 (19.44)
13 (9.03)
18 (12.50)
4 (2.78)
19 (13.19)
4 (2.78)
4 (2.78)

4 (14.81)
2 (7.41)
3 (11.11)
0 (0)
4 (14.81)
0 (0)
0 (0)

24 (20.51)
11 (9.40)
15 (12.82)
4 (3.42)
15 (12.82)
4 (3.42)
4 (3.42)

0.59
0.74
0.80
0.33
0.78
0.33
0.33

Table 2 Characteristics of Acute Pancreatitis

In our study, 27 (18.75%) out of 144 developed AKI. In these 27 patients of AP with AKI, 14 (51.85%) had Stage I AKI, 4 (14.81%) had Stage II AKI and 9 (33.33%) had Stage III AKI. Out of total 27 patients of AP with AKI, 9 (33.33%) required RRT whereas 18 (66.66%) did not require RRT (Table 3). At the time of discharge, 14 (51.85%) recovered their renal functions completely, 1 (3.70%) had partial recovery, while 12 (44.44%) did not recover renal function. Patients of AP with AKI had very high mortality 48.15% (13 out of 27) as compared to total of 117 patient of AP without AKI where mortality was 1.71%. Total of 15 (10.42%) patients expired in our study. Of those patients, who expired, 13 (85%) had AKI and 2 didn’t have AKI. Out of 9 patients requiring dialysis, 6 (66.6%) patients expired and only 3 survived.

AKI (n= 27

AKI Stage

RRT

Recovery

 

Stage 1

Stage II

Stage III

AKI
with RRT

AKI without RRT

Complete

Partial

Non recovery

 

14

4

9

9

18

12

1

14

Table 3 Characteristics of AKI

Discussion

Acute Pancreatitis results in 100,000 hospitalizations per year and the incidence of acute pancreatitis ranges from 13 to 45 per 100,000 population-years.17 Eighty percent of cases of AP are interstitial and mild; the remaining 20% to 30% are necrotizing and severe with hospital mortality rates of 15%.1

AKI is a common serious complication of AP and an important marker of morbidity and mortality in critically ill patients. The prognosis of AP patients with AKI is extremely poor with mortality rates ranging between 25-75%.2,3 The combination of renal disease and SAP can occur as a result of systemic conditions that affect many organs not only kidney and pancreas. The mechanism of AKI that occurs in patients with SAP remains unclear and may involve many factors. Knowledge of the pathophysiology and diagnosis of AKI following SAP might improve the therapeutic outcome of critically ill patients.

Several studies10,12,18 attempted to identify risk factors for the development of AKI in patients of AP. With the objective of studying risk factors for AKI in patients of AP and to study spectrum and outcome for AKI in AP, we conducted this study in SDM hospital, Jaipur (India).

Total of 144 patients of AP, 35 (24.35%) had severe acute pancreatitis. Overall, 18.75 % patients (27 out of 144 AP patients) developed AKI. We found that the incidence of AKI was significantly higher in patients of SAP (48.15%) when compared to mild to moderate AP where it was only (9.15%). Overall mortality in our study was around 10.4% but the mortality in patients who developed AKI was very high 48.15% compared to those without AKI (1.7%). Furthermore, the patients who died in our study, nearly 85% of them had AKI. Retrospective study from a tertiary care centre in India reported 19.4 % incidence of AKI in SAP patients and very high mortality (57%) in such patients which is consistent with our study.19 Devani et al.13 in their study reported an overall AKI incidence of 7.9% and it’s independent association with higher mortality.13 A multicenter retrospective study of critically ill SAP patients found 69% incidence of AKI.20 In our study, approximately 33% (9 out of 27) patients of AKI required dialysis and 44.4 % did not recover renal function i.e serum creatinine didn’t touch baseline and the patient was still on renal replacement therapy at the time of discharge or death. In a study by Naqvi, complete renal recovery was observed in 54% patients.21

In our study, we found that advanced age, higher SOFA score, high BMI, presence of sepsis, shock, hypoxemia, third spacing of fluid and pre-existing renal dysfunction were risk factors for development of AKI in AP. Etiology of acute pancreatitis had insignificant impact on AKI in our while study by Ravindra et al. found alcohol as a significant risk factor for AKI in SAP.19 Our results were consistent with another study where the investigators found that age, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores, pre-existing renal dysfunction, abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) were risk factors for AKI in patients with AP.(2) Similarly, study of etiology and epidemiology of AKI in SAP patients in one study, age, APACHE, renal dysfunction, ACS, sepsis were found to be independent risk factors for AKI.20 In the same study, investigators concluded that the presence of AKI was associated with longer hospital and ICU stay which was again consistent with our study. A retrospective study of 139 AP patients found higher acute physiologic assessment and chronic health evaluation II score, higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score in patients with AKI.22 This study also found lower survival rate in AKI patients.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the overall prognosis of AP patients with AKI is guarded with significantly high morbidity and mortality. Further multicentre, randomized prospective studies are required to identify etiology, risk factors and outcomes of AKI in patients with acute pancreatitis.

Acknowledgments

None.

Conflicts of interest

Author dealer there are no conflicts of interest.

Funding

None.

References

  1. Yan Santvoort HC, Bakker OJ, Bollen TL, et al. A conservative and minimally invasive approach to necrotizing pancreatitis improves outcome. Gastroenterology. 2011;141(4):1254–1263.
  2. Li H, Qian Z, Liu Z, et al. Risk factors and outcome of acute renal failure in patients with severe acute pancreatitis. J Crit Care. 2010;25(2):225–229.
  3. Lin HY, Lai JI, Lai YC, et al. Acute renal failure in severe pancreatitis: a population-based study. Ups J Med Sci. 2011;116(2):155–159.
  4. Otsuki M, Takeda K, Matsuno S, et al. Criteria for the diagnosis and severity stratification of acute pancreatitis. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19(35):5798–5805.
  5. Steinberg W, Tenner S. Acute pancreatitis. N Engl J Med. 1994;330(17):1198–1210.
  6. Yadav D, Lowenfels AB. Trends in the epidemiology of the first attack of acute pancreatitis: a systematic review. Pancreas. 2006;33(4):323–330.
  7. Shah AP, Mourad MM, Bramhall SR. Acute pancreatitis: current perspectives on diagnosis and management. J Inflamm Res. 2018;11:77–85.
  8. Forsmark CE, Vege SS, Wilcox CM. Acute Pancreatitis. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(20):1972–1981.
  9. Compañy L, Sáez J, Martínez J, et al. Factors predicting mortality in severe acute pancreatitis. Pancreatology. 2003;3(2):144–148.
  10. Halonen KI, Leppaniemi AK, Puolakkainen PA, et al. Severe acute pancreatitis: prognostic factors in 270 consecutive patients. Pancreas. 2000;21(3):266–271.
  11. Herrera GME, Seller PG, de La Rubia GC, et al. Acute renal failure profile and prognostic value in severe acute pancreatitis. Med Clin (Barc). 2000;115(19):721–725.
  12. Kes P,Vucicevic Z, Ratkovic-Gusic I, et al. Acute renal failure complicating severe acute pancreatitis. Ren Fail. 1996;18(4):621–628.
  13. Devani K, Charilaou P, Radadiya D, et al. Acute pancreatitis: Trends in outcomes and the role of acute kidney injury in mortality- A propensity-matched analysis. Pancreatology. 2018;18(8):870–877.
  14. Thoeni RF. The revised Atlanta classification of acute pancreatitis: its importance for the radiologist and its effect on treatment. Radiology. 2012;262(3):751–764.
  15. Jones AE, Trzeciak S, Kline JA. The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score for predicting outcome in patients with severe sepsis and evidence of hypoperfusion at the time of emergency department presentation. Crit Care Med. 2009;37(5):1649–1654.
  16. Mehta RL, Kellum JA, Shah S V, et al. Acute Kidney Injury Network: report of an initiative to improve outcomes in acute kidney injury. Crit Care. 2007;11(2): R31.
  17. Yadav D, Lowenfels AB. The epidemiology of pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer. Gastroenterology. 2013;144(6):1252–1261.
  18. Zhang XP, Wang L, Zhou YF. The pathogenic mechanism of severe acute pancreatitis complicated with renal injury: a review of current knowledge. Dig Dis Sci. 2008;53(2):297–306.
  19. Kumar R, Pahwa N, Jain N. Acute kidney injury in severe acute pancreatitis: an experience from a tertiary care center. Saudi J kidney Dis Transpl. 2015;26(1):56–60.
  20. Zhou J, Li Y, Tang Y, et al. Effect of acute kidney injury on mortality and hospital stay in patient with severe acute pancreatitis. Carlton. 2015;20(7):485–491.
  21. Naqvi R. Acute Kidney Injury in association with Acute Pancreatitis. Pak J Med Sci. 2018;34(3):606–609.
  22. Shi N, Sun GD, Ji YY, et al. Effects of acute kidney injury on acute pancreatitis patients’ survival rate in intensive care unit: A retrospective study. World J Gastroenterol. 2021;27(38):6453–6464.
Creative Commons Attribution License

©2022 Mathur. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.

Citations