Submit manuscript...
eISSN: 2377-4304

Obstetrics & Gynecology International Journal

Review Article Volume 6 Issue 5

Psychological behavior of the counselor in counseling patient for trail of labor after cesarean section

Sali Z Talab, Afnan Bashikh, Haitham A Badr

Security Forces Hospital, KSA

Correspondence: Haitham A Badr, Security Forces Hospital, KSA, Tel 00966-505274423

Received: December 14, 2016 | Published: April 17, 2017

Citation: Talab SZ, Bashikh A, Badr HA. Psychological Behavior of the Counselor in Counseling Patient for Trail of Labor after Cesarean Section. Obstet Gynecol Int J. 2017;6(5):111-112. DOI: 10.15406/ogij.2017.06.00217

Download PDF

Abstract

Trail of labor after lower segment cesarean section (TOLAC) is defined as successful vaginal delivery of the fetus for pregnant ladies with a previous history of primary lower segment cesarean delivery instead of elective repeat cesarean delivery (ERCD).1  However, each pregnant lady with a previous history of a primary lower segment cesarean has the right to choose the mode of her delivery at the end of pregnancy which can be either TOLAC or ERCD.2 Moreover, TOLAC is encouraged to be attempted with each patient after a primary lower segment cesarean in order to decrees the prevalence of repeated cesarean section. The rate of achieving successful TOLAC was noted to be decreasing in the last decades.3 TOLAC considered to be a safe route of delivery in the absence of contraindications.4 Furthermore, it seems that health care providers are not comprehending appropriate counselling and they may misguide the patients during the counselling sessions.5

Objectives

To estimate the psychological behavior of the counselor to avoid the possible complications of TOLAC to stay out of litigations.

Methods

It is a retrospective cohort study. Conducted in Security Forces Hospital – Riyadh – Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Patients enrolled all pregnant women with primary lower segment cesarean section (n= 456) throughout the period from September 2014 to September 2015 were included. P values <0.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed with Statistical package for social Science software (SPSS).6-9

Results

Among 456 patients 181 (39.7 %) of women were counselled. Among who delivered by cesarean section, we found that the commonest reported indications for cesarean section were refusing from the beginning to deliver normally (30.6 %) and FTP (24.8 %). Among cases of FTP, latent phase found among (44.6 %) of them whereas (42.9 %) were in active phase and failure to descend was observed among 12.5 % of them. male counselors were more likely to end with women agreeing to try TOLAC more than female counselor (67.2% versus 47.2%). The highest agreement rate was reported among those counseled by obstetrician with 2-4 years of experience (83.3%). Counseling in outpatient department was more effective in resulting in women`s agreement compared to counseling in inpatient department (63.3% versus 27.3%), p=0.001.10-15 In the first counseling session, the highest success rate was reported by women in the age group 26-35 years (69.4 %), p=0.002. In the second counseling, the highest success rate was reported among women aged between 15 and 25 years (58.8 %) while the lowest was reported among those aged between 36 and 45 years, p=0.008. If the last delivery was cesarean section was accompanied by higher success rate than if it was not (53.1 % versus 33.3 %), p<0.001. parity of 1 also were more likely to agree for TOLAC compared to those over 4 parity (55 % versus none), p<0.001. Also, we noted that if the last delivery was cesarean section, it was accompanied by higher success rate than if it was not (53.1 % versus 33.3 %), p<0.001. Among cases of failure to progress, CS was indicated at less than 5cm in 44.6 % of cases. Receiving a complete course of augmentation by syntocinon was reported by 43.6 % of cases while having regular effective uterine contractions was observed among majority of them (82.7).16-18 Surprisingly, among cases of complete augmentation by syntocinon, more than one-third of women (38.7%) were not given enough time in the labor ward to progress. Majority of women (96.8%) didn’t complete the course of augmentation. Bilateral tubal ligation (BTL) per se was an indication for cesarean section among 11 women (5.3 %). Statistically significant association between offering bilateral tubal ligation and doing CS with bilateral tubal ligation as an isolated indication, p<0.001.19-22

Discussion

The decision for trail of labor after cesarean TOLAC or ERCD should be made by the woman and her treating physician after explaining all the risks and benefits. We proved in this study that the psychological elements involving characteristics of the counselor to avoid the possible complications of TOLAC has an impact in counselling those patients. Counseling was performed to (39.7%) of women while the rest were not counselled at all. There was a defect in counselling patients for TOLAC as only (39.7%) were counselled which could be due to either unintentional ignorance or unconsciously predicting that having previous vaginal delivery they are going to have successful VBAC. Furthermore, physicians should be alert to pregnant ladies’ age before repeating the counselling session as patients categorized between (26-35 years) age group should be limited to one counselling session. On the other hand, patients between (15-25 years) need to be counselled twice for the sake of accepting TOLAC. By studying FTP as an indication for the second cesarean we found that it was done for (24.8%). 44.6% of them were in latent phase. Moreover, in the second counseling session, if the last delivery was cesarean section was accompanied by higher success rate than if it was not, p<0.001. As a result, the only explanation could be secondary tokophobia which is known as fear of labor pain or getting normal childbirth due to last pregnancy experience.24-26. If patients are worried from pain or about the fetus, they can express their fears and we can release their concerns. We looked for any other associated reason for the cesarean and surprisingly, we found that majority of women didn’t complete the course of augmentation (≤6 hours of syntocinon).25,27 In regards BTL, although we could avoid exposing patients to the risk of major surgery which is the cesarean section and its associated complications by minimal invasive procedures such laparoscopy BTL after postpartum period as both have same effect in permanent sterilizations.27-29

Conclusion

Male counselors were found more likely to result in women agreeing for a trial of labor after cesarean section (TOLAC). The highest agreement rate was reported among those counseled by registrars with 2-4 years of experience. Counseling in outpatient department was more likely to result in women agreeing for a trial as well. Success rate after second counseling session was higher than first counseling session alone Majority of women were found to decide for a TOLAC after the second counselling session much more than after the first counseling session only specially if pregnant ladies between 15 and 25 years compared to those patients between 36 and 45 years who were found to change their mind after the second counselling sessions.

Recommendations

Thus, we recommend to counsel the patient for TOLAC in outpatient department at earlier gestational age and to include the registrar at least once. Creating and following hospital protocols to deal with each patient with previous primary lower segment cesarean section when they are in labor.

Acknowledgments

None.

Conflicts of interest

None.

References

  1. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice bulletin no. 115: Vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;16(2 Pt 1):450–463.
  2. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Panel. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development conference statement. Vaginal Birth after Cesarean: New Insights March 8–10, 2010. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;115(6):279–1295.
  3. Uddin SF, Simon AE. Rates and success rates of trial of labor after cesarean delivery in the United States, 1990–2009. Matern Child Health J. 2013;212(1):S397–S398.
  4. Studsgaard A, Skorstengaard M, Glavind J, et al. Trial of labor compared to repeat cesarean section in women with no other risk factors than a prior cesarean delivery. Acta Obstet Gynecol . 2013;92(11):1256–1263.
  5. Bernstein SN, Matalon–Grazi S, Rosenn BM. Trial of labor versus repeat cesarean: are patients making an informed decision? Am J Obstet . 2012;207(3):204.e1–204.e6.
  6. Baaqeel HS. Cesarean delivery rates in Saudi Arabia: a ten–year review. Ann Saudi Med. 2009;29(3):179–183.
  7. World Health Organization. Appropriate technology for birth. Lancet. 1985;2(8452):436–437.
  8. Ministry of Health, Department of statistics. Annual mortality report, Saudi Arabia, Riyadh: Ministry of Health. 2003;pp.1427AH–2006AD.
  9. Naef RW 3rd, Ray MA, Chauhan SP, et al. Trial of labor after cesarean delivery with a lower–segment, vertical uterine incision: is it safe? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995;172(6):1666–1673.
  10. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice bulletin no. 115: Vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116(2 Pt 1):450–463.
  11. Sharma PS, Eden KB, Guise JM, et al. Subjective risk vs. objective risk can lead to different post–cesarean birth decisions based on multi attribute modeling. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(1):67–78.
  12. Lyerly AD, Mitchell LM, Armstrong EM, et al. Risks, values, and decision making surrounding pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109(4):979–984.
  13. Landon MB, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ, et al. Maternal and Perinatal Outcomes Associated with a Trial of Labor after Prior Cesarean Delivery. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(16):2581–2589.
  14. Guise JM, Eden K, Emeis C, et al. Vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2004;2010;1.
  15. Wen SW, Huang L, Liston R, et al. Severe maternal morbidity in Canada, 1991–2001. CMAJ. 2005;173(7):759–764.
  16. Kaczmarczyk M, Sparén P, Terry P, et al. Risk factors for uterine rupture and neonatal consequences of uterine rupture: a population–based study of successive pregnancies in Sweden. BJOG. 2007;114(10):1208–1214.
  17. Sabol B, Denman MA, Guise JM. Vaginal birth after cesarean: an effective method to reduce cesarean. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2015;58(2):309–319.
  18. Gimovsky ML, Bayer–Zwirello LA, Plevyak M. Fetal heart rate monitoring casebook. Amnioinfusion with uterine dehiscence and fetal distress. J Perinatol. 1997;17(1):83–86.
  19. Landon MB, Leindecker S, Spong CY, et al. The MFMU Cesarean Registry: factors affecting the success of trial of labor after previous cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193(3 Pt 2):1016.
  20. Klagholz J, Strunk AL. merican College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Overview of the 2009 ACOG survey on professional liability. 2009
  21. Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, et al. Williams Obstetrics. (24th edn), McGraw–Hill Education, New York, USA. 2014.
  22. Friedman EA. Labor: Clinical evaluation and management. (2nd edn). Appleton–Century–Crofts, Newyork, USA. 1978;p.73.
  23. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Society for Maternal–Fetal Medicine. Obstetric care consensus no. 1: Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123(3):693–711.
  24. Størksen HT, Garthus–Niegel S, Adams SS, et al. Fear of Childbirth and Elective Caesarean Section: A Population–Based Study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2016;15(2015):221. 
  25. Judith A Lothian. Safe Prevention of the Primary Cesarean Delivery: ACOG and SMFM Change the Game. J Perinat Educ. 2014;23(3):115–118.
  26. Hamilton BE, Hoyert DL, Martin JA, et al. Annual summary statistics: 2010–2011. Pediatrics. 2013;131(3):548–558.
  27. Rouse DJ, Owen J, Hauth JC. Active–phase labor arrest: oxytocin augmentation for at least 4 hours. Obstet . 1999;93(3):323–328.
  28. Sabol B, Denman MA, Guise JM.  Vaginal birth after cesarean: an effective method to reduce cesarean. Clin Obstet . 2015;58(2):309–319.
  29. Suzuki S, Ikeda M. Reasons Why Some Japanese Pregnant Women Choose Trial of Labor After Cesarean.  J Clin Med Res. 2015;7(8):641–642.
Creative Commons Attribution License

©2017 Talab, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.