Mini Review Special Issue Reproductive System & Sexual Disorders
Ministry of Higher Education & Scientific Research, Iraq
Correspondence: Saadi JS AlJadir, Ministry of Higher Education & Scientific Research, PO Box 498, Nassiryia, Thi Qar, Iraq, Tel 964(0) 781 390 2926
Received: March 01, 2017 | Published: November 29, 2018
Citation: AlJadir SJS. Female genital mutilation (FGM). Obstet Gynecol Int J. 2018;9(6):444-446. DOI: 10.15406/ogij.2018.09.00383
FGM is defined by the WHO as "all procedures that involve partial or total removal of the external female genitalia, or other injury to the female genital organs for non-medical reasons". It is recognized as a violation of the human rights of women and girls, The practice is indulged in gender inequality, attempts to control women's sexuality, under intentions of purity, modesty and beauty. It is usually initiated and carried out by women, who see it as a source of honor, and who fear that failing to have their girls cut will expose them to social isolation. Female genital cutting and less precisely called female circumcision (as it is not similar to male circumcision), is a ritual removal of some or most of the external female genitalia. The practice is found in Africa, Asia and the Middle East, and within communities from countries in which FGM is common. UNICEF 1 estimated in 2016 that 200 million women today in 30 countries (27 African countries, Indonesia, Kurdistan‘s region of Iraq and Yemen) had undergone theses procedures, by away or another. Majority of FGM is performed on girl’s days after birth to 16 years old, particularly between the ages of 4 and 10 years, however, some communities perform the procedure in adulthood, such as at the time of marriage.
It reflects deep-seat dine quality between the genders, and constitutes a form of discrimination against females. It is nearly always carried out on minors, hence is a violation of the childhood’s rights. The practice also violates a person's rights to health, security and physical integrity, the right to be free from torture and cruel treatment, and the right to live when the procedures might result in extreme cases to death. In some societies, FGM is a ritual that indicates transition of the girl to womanhood and ultimately making her ready to undertake marriage. It is also motivated by ancient customs and beliefs about sexual behavior and virginity and chastity and approved by some religious mis beliefs and misconceptions! FGM is in many communities believed to reduce a woman's libido and therefore believed to help her resist sexual excitation. When a vaginal opening is covered or narrowed, the fear of the pain of opening it, and the fear that this will be found out, is expected to further discourage 'illicit' sexual act among those women. There is also a belief in some cultures that women's genitalia are un feminine (mimic males’), ugly or unclean! Quran (Holy book of Islam) devoid of any text includes a reference from near or from far for female genital mutilation, and there is no consensus on the legal judgment by absolute majority of clerical thinkers. The issue had been enormously come onto light after recent political and economic crises, wars’ disasters in those regions where FGM practice is commonly performed, therefore have increased the numbers of students and refugees to the United States and other western countries. Consequently, health professionals are facing victims and treating number of mutilated patients.2,3
Female genital mutilation is comprised 4 common types:
In 2016 UNICEF published most comprehensive report of data and analysis on the prevalence of FGM in Africa and the Middle East. The article depends on more than 70 national surveys, produced over a period of more than 20 years, the report focused on the 29 countries where the practice is concentrated most. In eight countries, almost all young girls are cut. In Somalia, the prevalence is 98%, in Guinea 96%, in Djibouti 93% and in Egypt, Eritrea and Mali the figure is 89% and a prevalence of 88% was reported in both Sierra Leone and Sudan. There might be 3 million girls at risk of having this procedure done annually In some countries, FGM has been lexicalized. In Egypt, most of the cutting is undertaken by trained healthcare professionals, which reduces the risk of infection, pain and bleeding, but serves to make the procedure appear acceptable within the country, in the face of the UN resolution and the increasing number of opponents indoor. FGM is considered all around the globe as a violation of the human rights of girls and women, there is growing opposition around the world that urged the World Health Assembly passed resolution WHA61.16, 2008 on the elimination of FGM and calling for collaborative actions in all sectors; health, education, finance, justice and women's affairs.4-8
WHO call efforts to eliminate female genital mutilation focus on:
Risks increase with increasing severity of the procedure; there are immediate or acute complications:
and long-term consequences can lead to:
The reasons why female genital mutilations are performed vary from one region to another as well as over time, and include a combination of social and cultural factors within groups and communities. The most commonly cited reasons are:
In 1997, WHO issued a joint statement against the practice of FGM together with the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) and the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) and great efforts have been made to counteract FGM, through research, work within communities, and changes in public policy and through international monitoring bodies and resolutions that condemn the practice There have been international efforts since the 1970s to persuade practitioners to abandon FGM, with positive outcome as it has been considered outlawed and consequently restricted in most of the countries in which it its heavily practiced, although the laws are still not stringent enough or rather poorly implementedyet this restriction had resulted the prevalence of FGM has decreased in most countries and eruption of increasing number of women and men in practicing communities support eliminating its practice The opposition to the practice is not without its critics, particularly among anthropologists, who have raised difficult questions about relativity of cultural customs and the universality of human rights.
None.
The author declares no conflict of interest.
©2018 AlJadir. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.