Submit manuscript...
eISSN: 2574-9927

Material Science & Engineering International Journal

Research Article Volume 5 Issue 2

Investigation of mechanical properties of bamboo/ sisal fiber reinforced hybrid composite materials

Sheleme Mosisa,1 Temesgen Batu2

1Department of Mechanical and Chemical Engineering, Wollo University, Ethiopia
2University of Stavanger, Norway

Correspondence: Sheleme Mosisa, Department of Mechanical and Chemical Engineering, Kombolcha Institute of Technology, Wollo University, P.O. Box.1145, Ethiopia,, Tel +251922484024

Received: February 25, 2020 | Published: March 24, 2021

Citation: Mosisa S, Batu T. Investigation of mechanical properties of bamboo/sisal fiber reinforced hybrid composite materials. Material Sci & Eng. 2021;5(2):24-31. DOI: 10.15406/mseij.2021.05.00152

Download PDF

Abstract

Sisal and Bamboo fibers are the most common fibers extracted from natural plants used to fabricate the bio-composite, environmentally friendly products. In this work, the Bamboo-Sisal fibers reinforced epoxy hybrid composite is fabricated to investigate and analyze the compression and hardness properties. The fibers were extracted mechanically and manually from bamboo and sisal plants. The 5% and 8% concentration of sodium hydroxide have been used to treat bamboo and sisal fibers respectively to eliminate lignin, cellulose, and other dirty particles in order to increase interfacial bonding of epoxy to fibers, and performance of the composite. Taguchi experimental approach is used to design composite by considering basic parameters such as weight fraction of sisal, fibers orientation, and curing temperature which affect composite performance. Compression molding and hand lay-up techniques have been used to fabricate the composite. The compression and hardness tests ware predicted on the specimen of hybrid bamboo/sisal fiber reinforced epoxy composites prepared with ASTM standard. The analyzed result revealed that the composite contains a 20/15% volume fraction of sisal to bamboo fibers and fabricated with fiber plies orientation of [0S/0B/0S/0B/0S/0B] and curing temperature at 40ºC record a high compression strength. While the better hardness strength obtained from composite contain 15/20% volume fraction of sisal to bamboo fibers, and fabricated with fiber plies orientation of [0S/0B/0S/0B/0S/0B] and cured at 55ºC.

Keywords: bamboo/sisal fibers, compression & hardness strength, taguchi method

Introduction

In recent Decades, synthetic fiber-reinforced polymers matrix composite materials are preferred in different industrial and structural applications due to they have lightweight, high stiffness, and the ratio of specific strength to weight.1 However, they have disadvantages such as high production cost, environmental effect during the production period and they do not recycle waste after use. Recently, researchers focus on natural fibers reinforcement in place of synthetic fibers to prepare environmental friendly composite materials.2 The natural fibers specifically, Bamboo, Sisal, Banana, Jute Flax, kenaf and other natural fibers are inherently lightweight low cost, environmentally friendly, and low density. Using natural fiber reinforced polymers composite as an alternative to synthetic fibers reinforced polymers have been started in recent last years. But still, the mechanical strength of the natural fiber-based composite was lagging behind to synthetic fiber-based composite. For this reason, most researchers3,4 did various studies by considering fibers type, hybridizing fibers, stacking orientation of fibers, the geometry of fibers, fabricating technique, matrix type and by treating the surface of fibers to increase the performance of natural fiber reinforced polymer composite materials. K.V. Sreenivas Rao, et al. studied on the mechanical property of Hybrid (sisal-flax, sisal-hem, and sisal-coir) fibers reinforced epoxy composites. The fibers are treated with NaOH and the hand lay-up method ware used to fabricate all composites. The investigated experimental result display, that the large compression and hardness strength recorded for hybrid sisal-coir reinforced epoxy composite.3 Navjot PS, the mechanical property of hybrid sisal/hemp fiber reinforced HDPE composite is superior to single fiber-reinforced composite.4 Also, S. A. H. Roslan, et al, revised the characterized mechanical properties of various bamboo fiber structure and various polymers to develop composite materials. Ashwin Sailesh et al.5 studied on determination of the best hardness values for hybrid banana-bamboo-chopped strand glass fibers reinforced epoxy resin composites.

the composite were designed according to Taguchi L4 orthogonal arrays depending on three factors (orientation of plies, matrix/hardness ratio and curing time) with two levels and fabricated with hand layup technique. The analyzed SN ratio display that the hybrid (bamboo- banana-chopped strand glass) fibers reinforced epoxy composites designed with plies orientation [0G, 0BM, +45BN, 0G], epoxy to hardness ratio (10:1) and 30 minutes curing time gave the better hardness values.5 Generally, this work concludes that the appropriate hardness of composite material is found by properly design the orientation of fibers and matrix to hardener mixing ratios.

From Natural fibers, The Sisal and Bamboo fibers are great attention of most researchers’ due to they are advantageous over synthetic fibers. Both Sisal and Bamboo fibers are extracted chemically, mechanically, or by combining both processes from sisal (Agave sisalana) and bamboo plants respectively.6 The mechanical properties of bamboo fibers are near to glass fibers. But the factors such as fiber orientation, bamboo species and age, fiber length and amount of treatment influence the mechanical strength of bamboo fiber.6,7 The sisal fibers have cultivated in countries like East Africa, Haiti, Brazil, India, and Indonesia.8 While Bamboo plants Asia-Pacific(India, China, Burma, Malaysia, etc), Africa (Mozambique, Ethiopia, Eastern Sudan, etc), America (Mexico, Columbia, Brazil, Costa Rica, etc) and Europe (England, France, Germany, Italy, etc). Both Sisal and bamboo fibers are inherently combined with cellulose and lignin materials. These materials have the ability to absorb the moisture and decreases inter-bonding of fibers with a matrix which is the root cause of decrease the mechanical strength of the composite. To eliminate this cause, various researchers use varies alkali and acid in chemicals to treat the surface of fibers in order to improve interface bonding of matrix and fibers.8,9 NaOH is the common alkali chemicals which various studs have been used with different concentration. Hence this work was conducted to investigate the compression and hardness tests and analyze the strength on the specimen of various composite made of hybrid bamboo–sisal fibers as a reinforcement with epoxy resin as matrix fabricated by hand layup and compression mold.

Materials and experimental methods

Materials

In this experiment, epoxy resin and catalyst (hardener) with a brand name (“SYSTEM # 2000 EPOXY”) and (“SYSTEM # 2060 HARDENER”), respectively are purchased from KADISCO paint industry Town Addis Ababa, Ethiopia which is manufactured with fiber Glast development Corporation Company was used. Reinforcement is the basic element in composite materials to increase the strength and stiffness. For this Experimental investigation, bamboo and sisal fibers are mechanically & manually extracted from three years of age of bamboo plant culms (Dendrocalamus asper) bamboo species and six years age of sisal plant(Agave sisalana) respectively in African bamboo P.L.C. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Both sisal and bamboo plants are demographically obtained from zone west shewa town Ambo, Ethiopia.

Extraction process and treatment of fibers

Firstly, the bamboo culms with around 180cm long are divided into four slabs by using a circular hack-saw machine. All slabs are banded and crushed by using circular banding and crushing machines respectively to remove liquid forms and the thinner layer exoderm from the inner bamboo Culm. Three weeks have been used to dry the crushed bamboo culms in the sun. Secondly, the dried bamboo strips are waiting in the water for twelve hours in order to make a soften slab. Then the bamboo strips are manually beaten many times at a slow uniform impact load using a rubber hammer in order to get single fiber. The resulting fiber bundle is combed using a steel wire comb. The process of beating and combing is repeated until individual fibers are separated. The strongest part of six years age of sisal plant leaf had cut out from the original sisal plant. Both ends of sisal plants have been trimmed to get the appropriate size. The surface of the sisal leave is scrapped by a sharp knife with the guidance of a wood table up to get the single fiber. The mixture of fibers and cellulose have been washed in pure water to identify the single fibers. Finally, the sisal fibers have been dried for 60 hours in the sun. The bamboo and sisal fibers have been treated in 5% and 8% concentration of NaOH for 4 and 8 hours respectively. Then, the fiber washed many times with fresh water in order to reduce reactivity with the environment. Finally, these fibers dried in sunlight for 48 hours.

Experimental design method

The composite contents and the fabrication process are the basic influence the mechanical properties of composites materials. Hence, the experimental study has been performed on the hybrid sisal-bamboo fibers reinforced composite fabricated with various fibers stacking orientation, various fibers content and curing temperature. The details of considered parameters, which influence the Compression and Hardness strength, have been presented in Table 1.

Taguchi design of experiment

Taguchi experimental design approach is the appropriate technique as it is used for various product quality control, process optimization, and product development and uses the minimum number of runs. It is a group of fractional factorial designs depend on the estimation of the main effect. For this study, four factors and three runs (levels) for each factor were considered for composite preparation

 The Taguchi experimental design steps are described as follows:10

  1. Identify the problem and noise factors
  2. Determine design parameters that influence product strength.
  3. Determine control parameters with their levels response
  4. Chose the appropriate orthogonal array
  5. Conduct experiments.
  6. Analysis final result and summarize the effect of factors

Identify the problem and noise factors: To determine the influence of fiber’s values and fabrication process on the Compression and Hardness strength of Hybrid Bamboo/sisal fibers reinforced epoxy composite materials.

Determine design parameters which influence product strength: The fibers weight percentage; fiber orientation and socking temperature during compression molding are considered as design factors that influence the performance of composite material

Determine control parameters with their levels response: The Compression and hardness strength are chosen as a response variable for the investigation. Control parameters are the variables that influence the result of the process or the product. The factors listed in Table 1 were chosen as control parameters with their levels.

Factors affect composite properties

Levels of factors and values

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Sisal fiber (wt %)

25

20

15

Bamboo fiber (wt %)

25

20

15

Plies orientation(º)

[0/ 0/ 0/ 0/0/ 0]

[90 /90/90 /90 /90 /90]

[0 /90/ 90/ 0 /0 /90]

Curing temperature(Cº)

25

40

55

Table 1 The levels and values of factors which affect the compression and hardness strength

Chose the appropriate orthogonal array: Taguchi representation for the orthogonal arrays is; La (b^c), where a is the value experimental runs, b is the value of levels for each factor, and c is the value of variables. Several levels of factors are used in orthogonal arrays. In this investigation, the factors are listed with their levels in Table 2 depending on L9 orthogonal arrays.

Types of composite

Sisal mass fraction (%)

Bamboo mass fraction (%)

The orientation of fiber plies

The curing temperature (Cº)

BSFRPHC 1

25

25

[0S/0B/0S/0B/0S/0B]

25

BSFRPHC 2

25

20

[90B/90S/90B/90S/90B/90S]

40

BSFRPHC 3

25

15

[0S/90B/90S/0B/0S/90B]

55

BSFRPHC 4

20

25

[90B/90S/90B/90S/90B/90S]

55

BSFRPHC 5

20

20

[0S/90B/90S/0B/0S/90B]

25

BSFRPHC 6

20

15

[0S/0B/0S/0B/0S/0B]

40

BSFRPHC 7

15

25

[0S/90B/90S/0B/0S/90B]

40

BSFRPHC 8

15

20

[0S/0B/0S/0B/0S/0B]

55

BSFRPHC 9

15

15

[90B/90S/90B/90S/90B/90S]

25

Table 2 Orthogonal arrays for the design of the experiment
Note: BSFRPHC with stand bamboo-sisal fibers reinforced polymer hybrid composite

Preparation of composite sample preparation and mechanical property characterization

For this study, nine types of the composite are fabricated by hand layup process and compression molding technique with pre-designed curing temperature. There are six plies of fibers are combined to make each composite. The 2:1 Epoxy resin to hardener chemicals ware mixed well and painted on the surface of the plies layer by layer to adhesive the fibers. At first, the aluminum foam was placed over the wide steel plate to make a good and clean surface finish of the composite. Then the wax painted on the surface of aluminum foam used for simply releasing at the end of curing time. After that, the epoxy resin spread on the painted wax. The fibers are over placed one by one and painted up to the last layer. Then the prepared samples were allowed to compress with the 5Mpa pressure Compression machine (Figure 1).

Figure 1 Materials and prepared samples for compression and hardness test (A) sisal fiber, (B) bamboo fiber, (C) epoxy, hardener and wax, (D) prepared composites, (E) specimen for hardness test, (F) prepared specimen for compression test.

Compression test: The compression strength testing was performed on hybrid Bamboo/Sisal fiber reinforced epoxy composite in a laboratory experiment. In this section, the prepared specimen was involved in axial compression loading using the UTM. The dimension of the specimen is (25x25x3.17) which is prepared according to ASTM D3410. To obtain the result of the compression test, the specimen is inserted into the test fixture which is placed between the plates of the testing machine and loaded in compression. The maximum load attained was recorded by the UTM testing system after the specimen failed. A typical specimen failure is shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2 (A) Fixture of compression test and (B) Failure mode of samples after the test.

Hardness test: The hardness testing was performed on hybrid sisal/bamboo fibers reinforced epoxy composite in a laboratory experiment. In this section, the prepared specimen was involved in hardness testing using the Rockwell Hardness testing machine as per scale -A. The dimension of the specimen is (20x20x3)mm3 were prepared as per ASTM D 384. To obtain Hardness test results, the specimen is inserted into the test fixture which is placed between the bottom circular plates of the testing machine and upper 60kg loaded in according to scale –A. after 60kg load attained by hand control loading part, the hardiness values recorded on the dial. The hardness testing fixture is shown in Figure 3.

Figure 3 (A) The front view of the hardness test Fixture, (B) Side view of the hardness test fixture.

Result and discussion

Evaluation of compression strength

The compressive strength has been evaluated for nine different types of hybrid sisal bamboo fibers reinforced epoxy composite. For each composite, five similar specimens are prepared and tested. Figure 4 displays the average values of stress-strain curves of compression strength for all composites obtain during the compression test. The graph indicates nonlinear segments (there is up and down) and the curve is not smooth, in which the jerky/stick-slip behavior is responsible for this response. During fracture compressive stress of BSFRPHC rapidly decreased with buckling of the specimen. The weight percentage of fibers, fiber plies orientation and curing temperature plays a great influence on the compression strength of the composite. For example from Figure 5 the composite type BSFRPHC 6 is fabricated with (25/15 wt. % sisal to bamboo fibers, 60% epoxy), fibers stack-oriented [0S/0B/0S/0B/0S/0B] and composite cured with 40ºC has given large ultimate compressive strength (47.44Mpa) while BSFRPHC 2 which fabricated with 25/20 %sisal /bamboo volume percentage, fiber orientation [90B/90S/90B/90S/90B/90S] and at 40ºC curing temperature had record lower ultimate compression strength (8.79Mpa). From this increasing sisal fiber volume fraction, increase compression strength. The orientation of fiber also plays a vital role to increase the compression strength.

Figure 4 The average value of the stress-strain curve for the compression test.

Figure 5 The average value of compression strength of all BSFRPHC.

Evaluation of hardness strength

It is seen that from table Table 3, the BSFRPHC 1have low hardness number (2.18 HRA). From these values, we observe that the inter bonding of hybrid sisal/bamboo fiber reinforced epoxy composite is low due to this composite is fabricated at 25ºC. The hardness number increase due to increasing curing temperature and decreasing bamboo fiber volume fraction. The BSFRPHC (8&9) are fabricated from the same bamboo fiber volume matrix (15%) but the hardness number of BSFRPHC 9 (8HRA) is lower than BSFRPHC 8(23.4 HRA).from this we conclude that the hardness number of BSFRPHC increase for 55ºC curing temperature, [0S /0B/0S/0B/0S/0B] orientation of fiber and 15%/20% sisal/ bamboo fiber volume fraction content (Figure 6). Now, we have to find the ratio of Signal to Noise for all data of compression and hardness strength tabulated in Table 4. The three functions have been postulated by Taguchi are:

Composite type

 Hardness number in HRA

Samples 1

Samples 2

Samples 3

Samples 4

Samples 5

Average sample

BSFRPHC 1

2.9

3.2

1.8

1.4

1.6

2.18

BSFRPHC 2

1.7

2.5

4.4

1.5

3.2

2.66

BSFRPHC 3

13.4

16.7

14.9

17.4

14.2

15.32

BSFRPHC 4

12.3

12.1

9

11.8

10.2

11.08

BSFRPHC 5

15

23.4

21.1

29.6

16

21.02

BSFRPHC 6

13.4

13.3

14.7

12.8

25.6

15.96

BSFRPHC 7

16.2

18.2

21.4

22.5

25.2

20.7

BSFRPHC 8

14.2

17.7

25

29.4

33.4

23.94

BSFRPHC 9

3.2

5

5.6

7.7

18.5

8

Table 3 Hardness test result

Composite type

Compression strength (Mpa)

S/N ratio values for compression strength

The average value of hardness number in HRA

S/N ratio values for hardness strength

BSFRPHC 1

33.81

30.45

27.78

6.77

BSFRPHC 2

8.79

18.87

4.04

8.49

BSFRPHC 3

27.19

28.68

2.18

23.7

BSFRPHC 4

13.24

22.43

2.66

20.89

BSFRPHC 5

44.62

32.99

15.32

26.45

BSFRPHC 6

47.44

33.52

11.08

24.06

BSFRPHC 7

25.99

28.29

21.02

26.32

BSFRPHC 8

33.31

30.45

15.96

27.58

BSFRPHC 9

42.48

32.56

20.7

18.06

Table 4 S/N ratios values for ultimate compression and hardness strength

Figure 6 The average value of hardness strength of all BSFRPHC.

  1. Smaller the better
  2. Larger the better
  3. Nominal the best

In this experimental, the larger better is selected to determine the compression and hardness performance of prepared composite specimens. According to the Taguchi design approach, the ratio of product quality (signal) to uncontrollable factors (noise) should be high. The signal to noise (S/N) ratio for large better types of the objective function is calculated as follows:

η=10lo g 10 1 y 2   MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qacqaH3oaAcqGH9aqpcqGHsislcaaIXaGaaGimaiaadYgacaWG VbGaam4za8aadaWgaaqaaKqzadWdbiaaigdacaaIWaaajuaGpaqaba Wdbmaalaaapaqaa8qacaaIXaaapaqaa8qacaWG5bWdamaaCaaabeqa aKqzadWdbiaaikdaaaaaaKqbakaacckaaaa@47FD@ Where -y is the value of ultimate strength.

The S/N ratio values for each experiment are computed by using the MINITAB version 18.0 software. The computed S/N ratio from MINITAB software is presented in Table 4 & Table 5. From Figure 7A & 7B, it is seen that a large SN ratio was recorded for sisal and bamboo fibers of volume fraction at level 3 (15% and15%) respectively. and also from Figure 7C & 7D observed that the large SN ratio was seen for fiber orientation and curing temperature at level 1[0S/0B/0S/0B/0S/0B] and level 1(25ºC) respectively. Generally to increase the compression strength of hybrid sisal/bamboo fiber reinforced epoxy composite under a compression load, fabricate hybrid sisal/bamboo with fiber volume fraction (15%/15%), sisal/bamboo fiber orientation [0S/0B/0S/0B/0S/0B] and curing at 25ºC room temperature is the best one. Figure 8A & 8B, explain that large SN ratio was recorded for sisal and bamboo fibers of volume fraction at level 3(15% and15%) respectively. and also the Figure 8C & 8D, we observe that the large SN ratio was seen for fiber orientation and curing temperature at level 3[0S/90B/90S/0B/0S/90B] and level 3(55ºC) respectively. From this result, the hardness strength increase due to the sisal and bamboo fiber weight decrease from 25% to 15% and due to increasing temperature from 25ºC to 55ºC. And also bi-unidirectional fiber orientation increase hardness strength.

Factors

 

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Max-Min

Rank

Sisal

mass fraction %

For compression

26

29.64

30.43

4.43

4

For hardness

12.98

23.8

23.98

11

1

Bamboo mass fraction %

For compression

27.05    

27.43

31.58

4.53

3

For hardness

17.99

20.84

21.94

3.95

4

Fiber orientation

For compression

31.47    

24.62

29.98

6.85

1

For hardness

19.47

15.81

25.49

9.68

2

Curing temperature

For compression

32

26.89

27.18

5.11

2

For hardness

17.09

19.62

25.05

7.96

3

Table 5 The response values of the control factors at each level for both ultimate compression & hardness strength

Figure 7 Mean effects plot for S/N ratios under compression strength.

Figure 8 Main effects plot for SN ratios for hardness test.

Conclusions

In this study, bamboo and sisal fibers are extracted manually and mechanically from bamboo and sisal plants respectively. Alkaline treatment was carried out for both sisal and bamboo 8% and 5% NaOH concentration respectively to remove cellulose, lignin, and other fats. Next to that the sisal/bamboo fibers reinforced epoxy hybridized composite material was fabricated and characterized the mechanical properties specifically compression and hardness strength by using laboratory tests. Based on the result data obtained from experimentally investigated compression and hardness tests, few points described as follows:

  1. The sisal/Bamboo fibers reinforced epoxy matrix hybrid composite material fabricated at 40ºC Consolidation temperature with 20/15 % sisal to bamboo fibers, 65% epoxy volume fraction and oriented fibers with [0S/0B/0S/0B/0S/0B] record the maximum values of compression strength (47.44Mpa).
  2. While the composite fabricated with 55ºC Consolidation temperature with 15/20 % sisal to bamboo fibers, 65% epoxy volume fraction and oriented fibers with [0S/0B/0S/0B/0S/0B] record the maximum values of hardness strength (23.4 HRA).
  3. The result observed from S/N curve reveals that fibers stack [0S/0B/0S/0B/0S/0B] and curing temperature (25ºC) have played a great role to increase compression strength. For hardness strength, the S/N curve shows fiber orientation level 3[0S/90B/90S/0B/0S/90B] and curing temperature at level 3(55cº) is the better. For both compression and hardness investigation, the S/N curve ensures that the strength increase due to a decrease in the sisal and bamboo volume fraction decrease from 25% to 15%.
  4. From the experimental investigation and characterization result, henceforth, can generalize that the hybrid bamboo/ sisal fiber reinforced epoxy matrix composite material has significantly good mechanical strength, along with the inherent importance being cost-effectiveness, environmentally friendly, low specific to weight ratio and so on for various application.

Acknowledgments

The support of African Bamboo PLC on composite sample preparation and Bishoftu Defense College material testing laboratory with composite sample testing are highly appreciated.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this article.

References

  1. Ma ML, Wang GL. Frp Structure Design Method Based On The Stiffness Equivalence: Case Study And Practice. Engineering Review. 2012;32(3):165–171.
  2. Santulli C, Sarasin F, De Rosa Igor Maria, et al. Mechanical and thermal characterization of epoxy composites reinforced with random and quasi-unidirectional untreated Phormium Tenax leaf fibers. Materials & Design (1980-2015). 2010;31(5):2397–2405.
  3. Sreenivas Rao KV, Akash NSVG, Sanjeevamurthy. Mechanical Properties Of Natural Fibers Reinforced Hybrid Composites. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences. 2016;11(1).
  4. Singh NP, Aggarwal L, Gupta VK. Tensile Behavior of Sisal/Hemp Reinforced High-Density Polyethylene Hybrid Composite. Materials Today: Proceedings. 2015;2(4-5):3140–3148.
  5. Ashwin Sailesh CS. Predicting the best hardness of Banana-Bamboo-Glass fiber-reinforced Natural fiber composites using Taguchi method. International Journal of Engineering Development and Research. 2018.
  6. Abdul Khalil HPS, Bhat IUH, Jawaid M, et al. Bamboo fiber-reinforced biocomposites: A review. Materials & Design. 2012;42:353–368.
  7. Mohammed L. A Review on Natural Fiber Reinforced Polymer Composite and Its Applications. International Journal of Polymer Science. 2015:1–15.
  8. Kuruvilla Joseph RDTF, Beena James, Sabu Thomas, et al. A Review On Sisal Fiber Reinforced Polymer Composites. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental. 1999;3(3):367–379.
  9. Girisha CS, Gunti Rangasrinivas, Manu S, et al. Mechanical Performance Of Natural Fiber-Reinforced Epoxy-Hybrid Composites. International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications. 2012;2(5).
  10. Sorana D, Bolboacă ALJ. Design of Experiments: Useful Orthogonal Arrays for Number of Experiments from 4 to 16. Entropy. 2007;9:198–232.
Creative Commons Attribution License

©2021 Mosisa, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.