Submit manuscript...
eISSN: 2574-9927

Material Science & Engineering International Journal

Technical Paper Volume 2 Issue 5

Utilization of steel plants waste

Yakshil Chokshi,1,2 Neelam Sompura,2 Dutta SK1

1Metallurgical & Materials Engineering Department, Maharaja Sayajirao University of Baroda, India
2Government Polytechnic, Rajkot, India

Correspondence: Dutta SK, Former Professor & Head, Metallurgical & Materials Engineering Department, Maharaja Sayajirao University of Baroda, India

Received: March 31, 2018 | Published: September 25, 2018

Citation: Chokshi Y, Sompura N, Dutta SK. Utilization of steel plants waste. Material Sci & Eng. 2018;2(5):144-147. DOI: 10.15406/mseij.2018.02.00048

Download PDF

Abstract

Utilization of waste generated by steel plants has become a crucial issue due to ever–tightening environment regulations. Such rules implemented on steel makers have raised the circumstances to reduce the wastes generated by steel plants. Approximately 500 kg waste materials are generated per tonne of crude steel by the steel plant. Additionally, the depletion of high–grade iron ores imposes broad research work to utilize the waste materials. Nowadays, considering all waste materials as an economical asset; there is a focus on zero waste generation by 100% recycling of waste. How to utilize steel plants’ waste in existing processing technology is highly challengeable for steel makers. One of the waste materials, mill scale is having rich content of iron; hence it should be transformed into valuable product i.e. steel. In the present work, an attempt is made to produce non–agglomerated sinter cake of mill scale with different proportions of charcoal fines on the basis of stoichiometric calculations. Different amount of lime is also added to improve the strength of sinter cake. Degree of reduction and compressive strength of the sinter cake were measured. Characterization studies were also carried out by using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy dispersive analytical X–ray (EDAX). A uniform texture of fine metallic particles confirmed that homogeneous reduction has occurred. Best result was achieved in sinter cake containing 10% excess charcoal of stoichiometry and 20% lime in which compressive strength obtained is 182 kg/sample and degree of reduction (a) is 47.8%. This sinter cake was charged along with Thermo–mechanically treated (TMT) steel scrap to check the feasibility of steel making in induction furnace. The experimental result shows that the waste product can be used successfully for production of steel.

Keywords: waste utilization, mill scale, non–agglomerated sinter, steelmaking, domestic steel, crude steel, economic asset

Introduction

World produced 1,689 million tonne (Mt) of crude steel in 2017, is increased about 3.8% production with respect to 2016 (1627 Mt). India is a third largest producer of steel in the world which is preceded by China and Japan. Iron and steel industry’s growth in India has been exceptional since last 10 years. India’s crude steel production of year 2017 is 101.4Mt which was 53.5Mt in year of 2007. Correspondingly, the per capita steel consumption in the country was 43kg in the year of 2007 which increased to 65 kg in the year of 2017.1 As per National steel policy 2017 (NSP), estimated domestic steel production of 300Mt will be achieved by 2030–31. Reaching out to this visionary aim, Indian steel plants must have to discontinue outdated technologies, increase their production capacities, uplift the efficiency of operations, implement latest technologies, utilize low–grade raw materials as well as minimize waste generation. Considering all waste materials as an economic asset, Ministry of Steel, Government of India2 will encourage the steel companies to develop a Waste Management Plan for additional impetus on zero–waste or complete waste recycling.

In several iron and steel making processes,3 about 500kg/t of solid wastes of different nature are generated. Das et al.,4 have been reviewed and briefly reported on utilization of steel plant wastes in the several industries. The various solid wastes in the form of slags and sludges that are emerged from steel plants are blast furnace slag, blast furnace flue dust and sludge, Linz–Donawitz (LD) converter slag, LD sludge, LD dust, mill scale, mill sludge, acetylene sludge, etc. The solids and liquid wastes generated from a steel plant are shown in Table 1. The composition of these materials vary widely depending on the source of generation but usually contains some useful resources such as iron, carbon, calcium, zinc, lead, etc., which can be recovered and reused in a judicious manner.

During deformation of steel to long or flat product, mill scale is formed; when steel is subjected to expose at high temperature oxidation atmospheres, which promotes the growth of iron oxides layer at the surface of steel. The generation of mill scale represents about 2% of steel produced (approximately 1.9Mt in 2016 year) and is available as a secondary material due to its richness in iron (about 72% total Fe).5 Since, it is composed of various oxides of iron primarily Fe3O4; Fe2O3 and FeO are also present in small quantities. Mill scale is bluish black in colour and is usually less than one mm thick. Until last decade, solid wastes produced by integrated steel plants were called waste, but now this term is replaced as by–product due to intrinsic utilization of these wastes.6 It is possible to use this mill scale for pure iron powder production.

In India, 90% structural steels are produced by secondary sector where used mostly induction furnaces. Mill scale is rejected as a waste which would be recycled for recovery of metallic iron. There is lack of facilities for recycling of mill scale at the smaller capacity plants; due to absence of a sinter making facility in such units does not offer any scope for in–house recycling of mill scale.5

Research works5–10 have been carried out on various processes for use of mill scale as a charge material for iron and steel making. Due to fine size of mill scale, it is being agglomerated with or without carbonaceous material either by briquetting or sinter making. Further, reduction was done by reducing materials (e.g. coal/charcoal/coke fines, CO or H2 gas). Isothermal carbothermic reduction process shows potential to efficiently utilize mill scale as an agglomerated charge material.10 Mill scale and carbonaceous material such as coal or charcoal were processed in blended powder form at different temperatures (1073K, 1173K, 1273K etc.) for different holding time (15–120 min). Different amounts of coals were used, and the particle size of raw materials was also varied. The result showed that rate of reduction increased with time and temperature but decreased with increasing of particle size. Further, addition of flux can also be increased the rate of reaction.

In the present work, an attempt is made to produce non–agglomerated sinter cake of mill scale with coal fines. Further study is on feasibility of steelmaking by charging with different proportions of sinter cake and steel scrap in induction furnace.

Solid/liquid wastes

Amount (kg/t)

Source of generation

Coke breeze

Coke oven

Nut coke

Coke oven

Coke dust/sludge

Coke oven

Blast furnace slag

340 – 421

Blast furnace

Blast furnace dust/sludge

28

Blast furnace

Sintering plant

Sintering plant

LD slag

200

Steel melting shop

LD sludge

15 – 16

Steel melting shop

Lime fines

Steel melting shop

ACP/GCP sludge

Steel melting shop

Carbide sludge

Acetylene plant

Mill scale

22

Mills

Mill sludge

12

Rolling mills

Refractory, bricks

11.6

Steel melting shop /mills, etc.

Sludges/scales

Water treatment plant

Fly ash

Power plant

Table 1 Types of solid/liquid waste generated from steel plants4

Experimental work

Chemical analysis

Mill scale and scrap of TMT rods were procured from M/s. Punjab TMT Rolling Mill Ltd., Vadodara, India. Charcoal was procured from local market. Chemical analyses of mill scale are carried out by wet volumetric method as well as bulk chemical analysis by using energy dispersive X–ray fluorescence analysis (EDXRF) 800 Shimadzu, Japan. The chemical analyses of mill scale are illustrated in Table 2. Proximate analysis of as received charcoal powder sample is carried out by ASTM D3172 standard method. Table 3 The chemical composition of the TMT bar scrap employed in this work is given in Table 4.

Sinter making and reduction studies

Mill scale and charcoal powder were sintered in non–agglomerate condition. Mill scale was placed at the center of the metal mould and surrounded by charcoal. Lime was used as slag bonding in between of particles. Sintering operation was carried out in a laboratory scale electrically heated muffle furnace. For reduction studies, temperature and time was 1223K and 60 minutes respectively. Quantity of charcoal and lime was varied for the non–agglomerated sinter cake production. Compressive strength and degree of reduction of sinter cakes were measured.

Wang et al.,11 developed equation to calculate the degree of reduction (α) of iron ore–coal composite pellets as follows:

α =[ ( 4 7 m 0 ) x  { Δ m t   ( mx  f v ) } ]  x 100 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVCI8FfYJH8YrFfeuY=Hhbbf9v8qqaqFr0xc9pk0xbb a9q8WqFfeaY=biLkVcLq=JHqpepeea0=as0Fb9pgeaYRXxe9vr0=vr 0=vqpWqaaeaabiGaciaacaqabeaadaqaaqaaaOqaaKqzGeaeaaaaaa aaa8qacqaHXoqycaqGGaGaeyypa0tcfa4aamWaaOqaaKqba+aadaqa daGcbaqcfa4aaSaaaOqaaKqzGeGaaGinaaGcbaqcLbsacaaI3aGaam yBaKqbaoaaBaaajeaibaqcLbmacaaIWaaaleqaaaaaaOGaayjkaiaa wMcaaKqzGeWdbiaabccacaqG4bGaaiiOaiaacckacaaMb8Ecfa4aai qaaOqaaKqbaoaaciaakeaajugibiabfs5aejaad2gajuaGdaWgaaqc basaaKqzadGaamiDaaWcbeaajugibiaacckacqGHsislcaGGGcqcfa 4aaeWaaOqaaKqzGeGaamyBaiaaykW7caWG4bGaaiiOaiaadAgajuaG daWgaaqcbasaaKqzadGaamODaaWcbeaaaOGaayjkaiaawMcaaaGaay zFaaaacaGL7baaaiaawUfacaGLDbaajugibiaacckacaqGGaGaaeiE aiaacckacaaIXaGaaGimaiaaicdaaaa@6AD3@     (1)

Now this Eq. (1) is modified by Sah & Dutta12 as follows:

α= 400 7 ×  [ Δ m t  ( m  ×  f coal  ×  f vm ) ] (  m  ×  f ore  ×  f o  ×  ρ ore ) MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVCI8FfYJH8YrFfeuY=Hhbbf9v8qqaqFr0xc9pk0xbb a9q8WqFfeaY=biLkVcLq=JHqpepeea0=as0Fb9pgeaYRXxe9vr0=vr 0=vqpWqaaeaabiGaciaacaqabeaadaqaaqaaaOqaaKqzGeaeaaaaaa aaa8qacqaHXoqycqGH9aqpjuaGdaWcaaGcpaqaaKqzGeWdbiaaisda caaIWaGaaGimaaGcpaqaaKqzGeWdbiaaiEdaaaGaey41aqBcfa4aaS aaaOWdaeaajugib8qacaqGGcqcfa4aamWaaOWdaeaajugib8qacqqH uoarcaqGTbqcfa4damaaBaaajeaibaqcLbmapeGaaeiDaaWcpaqaba qcLbsapeGaeyOeI0IaaeiOaKqbaoaabmaak8aabaqcLbsapeGaae4v aKqba+aadaWgaaqcbasaaKqzadWdbiaaigdaaSWdaeqaaKqzGeWdbi aabckacqGHxdaTcaqGGcGaaeOzaKqba+aadaWgaaqcbasaaKqzadWd biaabogacaqGVbGaaeyyaiaabYgaaSWdaeqaaKqzGeWdbiaabckacq GHxdaTcaqGGcGaaeOzaKqba+aadaWgaaqcbasaaKqzadWdbiaabAha caqGTbaal8aabeaaaOWdbiaawIcacaGLPaaaaiaawUfacaGLDbaaa8 aabaqcfa4dbmaabmaak8aabaqcLbsapeGaaeiOaiaabEfajuaGpaWa aSbaaKazba4=baqcLbkapeGaaGymaiaabckaaSWdaeqaaKqzGeWdbi abgEna0kaabckacaqGMbqcfa4damaaBaaajeaibaqcLbmapeGaae4B aiaabkhacaqGLbGaaeiOaaWcpaqabaqcLbsapeGaey41aqRaaeiOai aabAgajuaGpaWaaSbaaKqaGeaajugWa8qacaqGVbaal8aabeaajugi b8qacaqGGcGaey41aqRaaeiOaiabeg8aYLqba+aadaWgaaqcbasaaK qzadWdbiaab+gacaqGYbGaaeyzaaWcpaqabaaak8qacaGLOaGaayzk aaaaaaaa@9459@    (2)

Where, Δ m t MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVCI8FfYJH8YrFfeuY=Hhbbf9v8qqaqFr0xc9pk0xbb a9q8WqFfeaY=biLkVcLq=JHqpepeea0=as0Fb9pgeaYRXxe9vr0=vr 0=vqpWqaaeaabiGaciaacaqabeaadaqaaqaaaOqaaKqzGeaeaaaaaa aaa8qacqqHuoarcaWGTbqcfa4damaaBaaajeaibaqcLbmapeGaamiD aaWcpaqabaaaaa@3C2B@ = Total weight loss, gm

m = Initial weight, gm

f coal MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVCI8FfYJH8YrFfeuY=Hhbbf9v8qqaqFr0xc9pk0xbb a9q8WqFfeaY=biLkVcLq=JHqpepeea0=as0Fb9pgeaYRXxe9vr0=vr 0=vqpWqaaeaabiGaciaacaqabeaadaqaaqaaaOqaaKqzGeaeaaaaaa aaa8qacaWGMbqcfa4damaaBaaajeaibaqcLbmapeGaam4yaiaad+ga caWGHbGaamiBaaWcpaqabaaaaa@3D78@ = Fraction of coal,

f vm MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVCI8FfYJH8YrFfeuY=Hhbbf9v8qqaqFr0xc9pk0xbb a9q8WqFfeaY=biLkVcLq=JHqpepeea0=as0Fb9pgeaYRXxe9vr0=vr 0=vqpWqaaeaabiGaciaacaqabeaadaqaaqaaaOqaaKqzGeaeaaaaaa aaa8qacaWGMbqcfa4damaaBaaajeaibaqcLbmapeGaamODaiaad2ga aSWdaeqaaaaa@3BB2@ = Fraction of volatile matter,

f ore MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVCI8FfYJH8YrFfeuY=Hhbbf9v8qqaqFr0xc9pk0xbb a9q8WqFfeaY=biLkVcLq=JHqpepeea0=as0Fb9pgeaYRXxe9vr0=vr 0=vqpWqaaeaabiGaciaacaqabeaadaqaaqaaaOqaaKqzGeaeaaaaaa aaa8qacaWGMbqcfa4damaaBaaajeaibaqcLbmapeGaam4Baiaadkha caWGLbaal8aabeaaaaa@3C9A@ = Fraction of ore,

f o MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVCI8FfYJH8YrFfeuY=Hhbbf9v8qqaqFr0xc9pk0xbb a9q8WqFfeaY=biLkVcLq=JHqpepeea0=as0Fb9pgeaYRXxe9vr0=vr 0=vqpWqaaeaabiGaciaacaqabeaadaqaaqaaaOqaaKqzGeaeaaaaaa aaa8qacaWGMbqcfa4damaaBaaajeaibaqcLbmapeGaam4BaaWcpaqa baaaaa@3AB9@ = Fraction of oxygen and

ρ ore MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVCI8FfYJH8YrFfeuY=Hhbbf9v8qqaqFr0xc9pk0xbb a9q8WqFfeaY=biLkVcLq=JHqpepeea0=as0Fb9pgeaYRXxe9vr0=vr 0=vqpWqaaeaabiGaciaacaqabeaadaqaaqaaaOqaaKqzGeaeaaaaaa aaa8qacqaHbpGCjuaGpaWaaSbaaKqaGeaajugWa8qacaqGVbGaaeOC aiaabwgaaSWdaeqaaaaa@3D6A@ = Purity of ore.

Melting practice

Melting was done in laboratory scale induction furnace (6kg capacity). TMT rods (as a scrap) and non–agglomerated sinter cake were charged with different proportion. Initially TMT rods are melted in induction furnace to make molten bath. Sinter cake was slowly charged and that was dissolved in molten bath. Lime was also added as a fluxing agent. After proper attending temperature of the bath, molten metal was poured into the sand mould. After proper cooling, casted sample was taken out from the mould and was chemically analyzed (as shown in Table 5) by Optical Emission Spectroscopy (OES).

Characterization and microstructure studies

The raw materials have been characterized by volumetric chemical analysis, X–ray fluorescence (XRF), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy dispersive analytical X–ray (EDAX). A Jeol SEM (Model: JSM–5610 LV), which is coupled with Oxford EDAX system, is used to characterize the morphology of sinter cake.

Analyte

Fet

Si

Mn

Cr

Cu

Al

P

O

wt.%

69.82

0.52

0.43

0.21

0.16

0.19

0.01

Balanced

Table 2 Chemical analysis of mill scale

Analyte

 Moisture

Volatile Matter

Ash

Fixed carbon

Total

wt.%

6.55

19.9

5.5

68.05

100.0

Table 3 Proximate analysis of charcoal

Analyte

Fet

C

Mn

S

P

Cr

Al

Cu

Si

Total

wt.%

98.33

0.19

0.79

0.02

0.04

0.16

0.16

0.09

0.22

100.0

Table 4 Chemical analysis of scrap of TMT rods

Analtye (wt.%)

C

Si

Mn

P

S

Fe

Heat 1 (90:10)

0.22

0.52

0.27

0.03

0.03

98.93

Heat 2 (85:15) 

0.27

0.59

0.35

0.03

0.04

98.72

Heat 3 (80:20) 

0.29

0.68

0.16

0.04

0.03

98.80

Table 5 Chemical analysis of produced steels

Result and disussions

Compressive strength and reduction studies

Figure 1 shows the produced non–agglomerated sinter cake.Table 6 shows the results of compressive strength and degree of reduction ( α MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVCI8FfYJH8YrFfeuY=Hhbbf9v8qqaqFr0xc9pk0xbb a9q8WqFfeaY=biLkVcLq=JHqpepeea0=as0Fb9pgeaYRXxe9vr0=vr 0=vqpWqaaeaabiGaciaacaqabeaadaqaaqaaaOqaaKqzGeaeaaaaaa aaa8qacqaHXoqyaaa@3839@ ) of sinter cakes. Higher percentage of charcoal and/or lime was shown good results of non–agglomerated sinter. Best combination of degree of reduction and compressive strength were obtained in 10% excess charcoal of stoichiometry and 20% lime. Highest compressive strength was achieved in sinter cake of 10% excess charcoal of stoichiometry and 30% lime. Overall, addition of lime is favorable to the strength as well as degree of reduction of sinter which are required for steel making.

Characterization and microstructure observation

Sinter cake was characterized by SEM–EDS. SEM image shows rough morphology of sinter (as shown in Figure 2). Fine precipitated particles and reduced metallic particles were observed at rough surface. Total Fe characterized is about 81% which confirmed that the reduction mechanism has taken place and reduced metallic Fe is present. Uniform texture of fine metallic particles was confirmed the homogeneous reduction mechanism.

Annealed steel sample was examined under microscope for microstructure observation. Texture of microstructure confirmed the hypoeutectic type of steel. Phases of ferrite and pearlite were clearly observed (Figure 3).

Figure 1 Non-agglomerated sinter cake.

Figure 2 SEM image of non-agglomerated sinter cake

Figure 3 Microstructure of annealed steel at 200X.

Charcoal as ‘Carbon’ (wt. %)

Compressive strength (kg/sample)

Degree of reduction (%)

< 05% of stoichiometric

129

5.56

< 10% of stoichiometric

108

9.65

Stoichiometric

166

10.81

> 05% of stoichiometric

133

15.28

> 10% of stoichiometric

142

20.31

>10% of Stoichiometric + 10% lime

178

32.19

>10% of Stoichiometric + 20% lime

182

47.84

>10% of Stoichiometric + 30% lime

195

43.30

Table 6 Resultant properties of non-agglomerated sinter

Conclusion

Utilization of mill scale, one of the steel plant wastes has shown better prospect in terms of high recovery of iron by non–agglomeration technique in the unorganized steel sector (majorly Induction Furnace route). This research work produced a non–agglomerated sinter cake from the steel plant waste (i.e. mill scale) that can be used in manufacture of steel.

Based on this research work, following conclusion have been made:

  1. Non–agglomerated sinter making process helps to nullify the energy consumption by the agglomeration operation.
  2. Best degree of reduction (a=47.84%) value was obtained in sinter cake of 10% excess stoichiometric charcoal and 20% lime.
  3. Best compressive strength (195kg/sample) was achieved in sinter cake of 10% excess stoichiometric charcoal and 30% lime.
  4. Lime imparted binding strength to the sinter and acted as a fluxing agent in steel making as well.
  5. SEM–EDAX analyses confirmed that uniform reduction and metallization has taken place.
  6. 10 to 20 wt. % of sinter cakes were charged as a raw material along with TMT scrap to produce steel successfully.
  7. There is an increase in the amount of slag produced with the increase in the amount of sinter cake charged, that due to lime content.
  8. The impurity compounds present in the sinter cake will not impose any detrimental effect on the properties of steel produced.

Acknowledgements

None.

Conflict of interest

Authors declares that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. World steel in figures 2018. World Steel Association.
  2. National Steel Policy 2017. Ministry of Steel (Establishment Division), Notification, New Delhi, India. 2017;8:1–36.
  3. Bagatini MC, Zymla V, Osório E, et al. Characterization and Reduction Behavior of Mill Scale. ISIJ International. 2011;51(7):1072–1079.
  4. Das B, Prakash S, Reddy PSR, et al. An overview of utilization of slag and sludge from steel industries. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 2007;50(1):40–57.
  5. Paswan D, Malathi M, Minj RK, et al. Mill Scale: A Potential Raw Material for Iron and Steel Making. Steelworld. 2015;21:54–56.
  6. Gade N, Verma G, Sen R, et al. Effect of Calcium Carbonate on the Reduction Behaviour of Mill Scale. Procedia Earth and Planetary Science. 2015;11:319–324.
  7. Eissa M, Ahmed A, El–Fawkhry M, et al. Conversion of Mill Scale Waste into Valuable Products via Carbothermic Reduction. Journal of Metallurgy. 2015;2015:9.
  8. Benchiheub O, Mechachti S, Serrai S, et al. Elaboration of iron powder from mill scale. J Mater Environ Sci. 2010;1(4):267–276.
  9. Gaballah NM, Zikry AF, Khalifa MG, et al. Production of Iron from Mill Scale Industrial Waste via Hydrogen. Open Journal of Inorganic Non–Metallic Materials. 2013;3(3):23–28.
  10. Mistri M, Bhatt A. B.E. Thesis. Met & Mates Engg Dept. MSU Baroda; 2011.
  11. Wang Q, Yang Z, Tian J, et al. Reduction kinetics of iron ore–coal pellet during fast heating. Ironmaking Steelmaking. 1998;25:443–447.
  12. Sah R, Dutta SK. Kinetic Studies of Iron Ore–Coal Composite Pellet Reduction by TG–DTA. Trans Indian Inst Met. 2012,64(6):583–591.
Creative Commons Attribution License

©2018 Chokshi, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.