Submit manuscript...
MOJ
eISSN: 2374-6920

Proteomics & Bioinformatics

Research Article Volume 4 Issue 6

In silico analysis of riboflavin carrier proteins from different Avian species

Sireesha Radarapu,1 Ramchander Merug,1 Ved Prakash Upadhyay,2 Karunakar Rao Kudle3

1Mahatma Gandhi University, India
2Government Engineering College, India
3Department of Biochemistry, Osmania University, India

Correspondence: Ramchander Merugu, University College of Science, Mahatma Gandhi University, Nalgonda, Telangana - 508254

Received: October 16, 2016 | Published: December 29, 2016

Citation: Radarapu S, Merugu R, Upadhyay VP, et al. In silico analysis of riboflavin carrier proteins from different Avian species. MOJ Proteomics Bioinform. 2016;4(6):340-343. DOI: 10.15406/mojpb.2016.04.00141

Download PDF

Abstrat

A comparative in silico characterization of the Riboflavin carrier proteins (RCP) or Riboflavin binding proteins (RfBP) was carried out to analyze their physico-chemical, secondary structural and functional properties. The amino acid composition of Riboflavin binding/carrier proteins were obtained from biological databases. Molecular weights of all the proteins were around 27,000kD. pI value of Cariama cristata was the highest when compared to all other proteins. The instability index of all the proteins was more than 40 showing that all of them are probably not stable. Amino acid composition of vitamin binding proteins obtained from biological databases. The composition of serine and glutamic acid was high while low concentrations of Tryptophan, valine and glycine residues were seen when compared to other amino acids. Dominance of α-helices and random coils was observed from the secondary structural analysis of the proteins. SOSUI server analysis has shown that all the proteins are soluble in nature

Keywords: RCP, in silico, physico chemical properties, secondary structure, sepharose column chromatography

Introduction

Vitamin binding proteins bind reversibly to vitamins with high affinity and receptor like specificity in serum of vertebrates.1–11 Riboflavin carrier proteins bind to riboflavin. RCP has been purified from many species. Vitamin binding proteins bind stoichiometrically and reversibly to vitamins with high affinity and receptor like specificity. Some of them are constitutive while some others are specific to riboflavin. These proteins supply coenzyme when there is physiological need and also regulate its supply. These binding proteins are able to scavenge nutrients and protect the embryo from infection. These specific carrier proteins like Riboflavin binding proteins, Thiamin binding proteins for vitamins have been identified in normal serum in all vertebrates.1–4 Proteins binding to water soluble vitamins such as Riboflavin binding/carrier proteins,5–11 vitamin B12 binding protein12,13 and thiamin binding protein14,15 have been demonstrated in the sera, egg white and yolk of the avian eggs. Riboflavin binding protein (RfBP) is a phosphoglycoprotein, whose primary physiological function is to store riboflavin.16 This carrier protein is essential for embryonic vitamin nutrition.17–20 Sepharose column chromatography was used to purify Riboflavin binding protein (RfBP) from Hen (Gallus gallus) egg white and yolk.8 Aquila hastate Riboflavin binding protein was purified by Kudle et al.7 Emu (Dromaius novaehollandiae) Riboflavin-binding protein (RfBP) was purified from egg white by Bindu et al.11 In the present study, a computational analysis of Riboflavin carrier proteins has been done and the results are discussed.

Materials and methods

UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot was used to retrieve the complete sequences of the Riboflavin carrier proteins. The computation of various physical and chemical parameters of the Riboflavin carrier proteins (aminoacids, positive charged residues, molecular weights, pI, negative extinction coefficient, aliphatic index, GRAVY instability index) was done using ExPASy’s ProtParam tool. ExPASy’s ProtScale tool was used to analyse hydrophobicity and transmembrane tendency.21 SOPMA tool server was used to characterize the secondary structural features of Riboflavin carrier proteins.22 The analysis of the Riboflavin carrier proteins motifs was done with the help of Motif Scan tool.23 The SOSUI server prediction yielded the transmembrane regions of the Riboflavin carrier proteins.24

Results and discussion

Riboflavin carrier protein primary physiological function is to store riboflavin and transfer the vitamin to the embryo.14–20 RfBP was isolated and purified from parrot eggs, peacock eggs.25,26 Nikhath et al.,25 purified RfBP for the first time from the yolk of parrot eggs using DEAE-Sephadex ion exchange chromatography followed by gel filtration on Sephadex G-100. Riboflavin binding protein (RfBP) from peacock eggs (Pavo cristatus) was purified by Rajendar et al.26 Serum RfBP is synthesized in the liver after which complexes with riboflavin to form the holoprotein. If it is not complexed it is excreted by the kidney. The holoserum RfBP is removed from circulation by ovarian follicles and transported into the developing oocytes. Serum RfBP plays a protective role which is important in a riboflavin deficient diet. Holo-serum RfBP is transformed into holoyolk RfBP upon modification of its oligosaccharide moieties. The magnum of the oviduct synthesizes all egg white proteins and removes many proteins from the plasma as a source of its amino acid pool. After which it is catabolised with the subsequent release of riboflavin. This riboflavin is then captured by egg white RCP, synthesized by secretory cells of the magnum. The protein is conserved through evolution12 and antibodies raised against this protein are capable of curtailing pregnancy. Karande et al.,13 suggested that RfBP could be used for regulating fertility. Maehash et al.,27 have reported the bitter inhibitory effect of Riboflavin-binding protein and hence it can also be used for reducing bitterness of foods. In our earlier works, we have purified the riboflavin binding proteins from different eggs.

Conclusion

In this study the physicochemical properties of RCP proteins obtained from database are presented in Table 1. Negative charged aminoacids were more than positively charged aminoacids in the all the proteins compared (Table 1). Molecular weights of all the proteins were around 27,000kD. pI value of Cariama cristata was the highest when compared to all other proteins. The instability index of all the proteins was more than 40 showing that all of them are probably not stable. Amino acid composition of vitamin binding proteins obtained from biological databases is presented in Table 2. The composition of serine and glutamic acid was high while low concentrations of Tryptophan, valine and glycine residues were seen when compared to other aminoacids. From Table 3, dominance of α-helices and random coils was observed from the secondary structural analysis of the proteins. SOSUI server analysis Table 4 has shown that all the proteins are soluble in nature.

Species name

No. of amino acids

Molecular weight

PI

- Ve charged residues

+ Ve charged residues

Extinction coefficient

Instability index

Gallus gallus

238

27211.4

5.13

35

23

46410

77.89

Dromaius

238

27343.9

5.25

34

25

53400

69.78

Merops nubicus

239

27390.7

5.58

32

26

54890

63.25

Charadrius vociferous

238

27346.8

5.52

33

25

53400

65.92

Cariama cristata

239

27563.2

7.37

31

32

53400

65.13

Nipponia nippon

240

27494.1

6.69

31

30

53400

64.32

Coturnix japonica

238

27237.4

5.36

34

23

44920

75.55

Table 1 Physico chemical characteristics of Riboflavin binding Protein sequences

Amino acids

Gallus gallus

Dromaius

Merops nubicus

Charadrius vociferous

Cariama cristata

Nipponia nippon

Ala

6.3

4.6

5.4

5

5

5

Arg

3.4

2.5

2.9

2.1

3.8

2.5

Asn

3.8

4.6

5.4

4.6

4.6

3.3

Asp

4.6

3.8

4.6

4.6

5.4

4.6

Cys

8

8

7.9

8

7.9

7.9

Gln

4.6

3.4

3.8

3.8

3.8

3.3

Glu

10.1

10.5

8.8

9.2

7.5

8.3

Gly

2.9

3.4

3.3

3.4

2.9

3.8

His

3.4

2.5

2.5

3.4

2.1

3.3

Ile

3.8

3.4

2.5

3.4

3.3

2.9

Leu

6.3

6.7

5.9

6.3

5.9

6.2

Lys

6.3

8

7.9

8.4

9.6

10

Met

3.4

3.8

3.3

3.8

3.8

3.8

Phe

3.4

3.4

3.3

3.4

3.3

3.3

Pro

3.4

3.4

3.3

3.4

3.3

3.3

Ser

13.4

13

13

12.2

13

13.3

Thr

4.2

4.2

4.2

4.6

4.6

5

Trp

2.5

2.9

2.9

2.9

2.9

2.9

Tyr

3.8

4.2

4.6

4.2

4.2

4.2

Val

2.5

3.8

4.2

3.4

2.9

2.9

Pyl

0

0

0

0

0

0

Sec

0

0

0

0

0

0

Table 2 Aminoacid composition of Riboflavin binding protein sequences

Gallus gallus

Dromaius

Merops nubicus

Charadrius vociferous

Cariama cristata

Nipponia nippon

Alpha helix

50

42.02

38.49

42.44

40.59

35.42

310 helix

0

0

0

0

0

0

Pi helix

0

0

0

0

0

0

Beta bridge

0

0

0

0

0

0

Extended Strand

12.18

12.61

15.48

14.29

15.9

13.75

Beta turn

6.3

6.72

8.79

7.98

9.21

7.5

Bend region

0

0

0

0

0

0

Random coil

31.51

38.66

37.24

35.29

34.31

43.33

Ambiguous state

0

0

0

0

0

0

Other state

0

0

0

0

0

0

Table 3 Secondary structural analysis of Riboflavin binding proteins

Nature

Gallus gallus

Dromaius

Merops nubicus

Charadrius vociferous

Cariama cristata

Nipponia nippon

Soluble/ Transmembrane

Soluble

Soluble

Soluble

Soluble

Soluble

Soluble

Table 4 SOSUI server analysis of Riboflavin binding proteins

Acknowledgements

None.

Conflict of interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kanai M, Raz A, Goodman DS. Retinol–binding protein:the transport protein for vitamin A in human plasma. J Clin Invest. 1968;47(9):2025–2044.
  2. Thomas WC, Morgan HG, Conner TB, et al. Studies of antiricketic activity in sera from patients with disorders of calcium metabolism and preliminary observations on the mode of transport of vitamin D in human serum. J Clin Invest. 1959;38(7):1078–1085.
  3. Edelstein S, Lawson DE, Kodicek E. The transporting proteins of cholecalciferol and 25–hydroxycholecalciferol in serum of chicks and other species. Partial purification and characterization of the chick proteins. Biochem J. 1973;135(3):417–426.
  4. Abe T, Muto Y, Hosoya NJ. Vitamin A transport in chicken plasma: isolation and characterization of retinol–binding protein (RBP), prealbumin (PA), and RBP–PA complex. J Lipid Res. 1975;16:200–210.
  5. Rhodes MB, Bennett N, Feency RE. The flavoprotein–apoprotein system of egg white. J Bio chem. 1959;234(8):2054–2060.
  6.  Ostrowski W, Skarzynski B, Zak Z. Isolation and properties of flavoprotein from the egg yolk. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1962;59:515–517.
  7. Karunakar RK, Pratap RMP, Veerababu N, et al. Purification and characterization of riboflavin carrier protein from egg white of South Indian spotted owlet (athene brama). International Journal of Applied Biology and Pharmaceutical Technology. 2012;3(4):2–6.
  8.  Madhukar RK, Prasad MSK. Purification and Characterization of riboflavin binding protein from (RfBP) Hen (Gallus gallus) DEAE–Sepharose column chromatography. Int J Appl Biol. 2011;2(1):27–29.
  9.  Madhukar Rao K, Prasad MSK. Int J of Pharama Sci R. 2012;3:494–496.
  10. Madhukar Rao K, Prasad MSK. Isolation and Purification of Riboflavin binding protein from Eagle egg yolk (Aquila hastate). Int J Appl Biology. 2012;3:351–354.
  11. Bindu MR, Prasad MSK. Iner J of Plant and Animal Scie. 2012;2:5–9.
  12. Adiga PR, Visweswariah SS, Karande AA, et al. Biochemical and immunological aspects of riboflavin carrier protein. J Biosci. 1988;13(1):87–104.
  13. Karande AA, Velu NK, Adiga PR. A monoclonal antibody recognizing the C–terminal region of chicken egg white riboflavin carrier protein terminates early pregnancy in mice. Mol Immunol. 1991;28(4–5):471–478.
  14. Naber EC, Cravens WW, Baumann Ca, et al. The effect of thiamine analogs on embryonic development and growth of the chick. J Nutr. 1954;54(4):579–591.
  15. Coates ME. In Physiology and biochemistry of the domestic fowl. In: Bell J, Freeman BM, editors. USA: Academic Press; 1971. p. 1, 373.
  16. Rhodes MB, Bennett N, Feency RE. The flavoprotein–apoprotein system of egg white. J Bio chem. 1959;234(8):2054–2060.
  17. Maw AJG. Inherited Riboflavin Deficiency in Chicken Eggs. Poultry Sci. 1954;33(1):216–217.
  18. Cowan JW, Boucher RU, Buss EG. Poultry Sci. 1964;45:538–541.
  19. Cowan JW, Boucher RU, Buss EG. Poultry Sci. 1966;45:538–41.
  20. Winter WP, Buss EG, Clagett CO, et al. Comp Biochem Physiol. 1967;22(3):897–906.
  21. Apweiler, et al. Fold Des. 1996;1(Suppl):3.
  22. Gasteiger E, Gattiker A, Hoogland C, et al. ExPASy: The proteomics server for in-depth protein knowledge and analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003;31(13):3784–3788.
  23. Geourjon C, Deleage G. SOPMA: significant improvements in protein secondary structure prediction by consensus prediction from multiple alignments. Comput Appl Biosci. 1995;11(6):681–621.
  24. Pagni M, Ioannidis V, Cerutti L, et al. MyHits: improvements to an interactive resource for analyzing protein sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35:W433–W437.
  25. Nadhira NK, Madhukar RK, Srikanth CN, et al. Scholars Research Library. Annals of Biological Research. 2014;5(2):92–95.
  26. Rajender G, Benajee G, Prasad MSK. Purification and characterization of riboflavin binding protein in egg white of peacock (Pavo cristatus). Cur Sci. 2007;93:24–25.
  27. Maehashi K, Matano M, Nonaka M, et al. Riboflavin–binding protein is a novel bitter inhibitor. Chem Senses. 2008;33(1):57–63.
Creative Commons Attribution License

©2016 Radarapu, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.