Submit manuscript...
MOJ
eISSN: 2573-2919

Ecology & Environmental Sciences

Research Article Volume 2 Issue 5

Some length-based determination of the age of Synodontis Schallin Lower River Benue, Nigeria

Akange Edward Terhemen, Terhemen ALIH Agbo Raphael, OSHIMAGYE Michael Obagye

Department of Fisheries and Aquaculture, Nigeria

Correspondence: Akange Edward Terhemen, Departments of Fisheries and Aquaculture, University of Agriculture, PMB 2373, Makurdi, Nigeria, Tel 234-703-715-730-5

Received: July 19, 2017 | Published: August 4, 2017

Citation: Terhemen AE, Raphael TAA, Obagye OM. Some length-based determination of the age of Synodontis Schall in Lower River Benue, Nigeria. MOJ Eco Environ Sci. 2017;2(4):218-222. DOI: 10.15406/mojes.2017.02.00038

Download PDF

Abstract

A Length-based study of the age of Synodontis schall from the lower River Benue was conducted for a period of 12 months (January-December, 2013). Length measurements (cm) were conducted on 963 samples of the fish species during the period of study. Five length-based approaches were used in analyzing the length-frequency data obtained in the 12-month period and the following asymptotic length, L MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVCI8FfYJH8YrFfeuY=Hhbbf9v8qqaqFr0xc9pk0xbb a9q8WqFfeaY=biLkVcLq=JHqpepeea0=as0Fb9pgeaYRXxe9vr0=vr 0=vqpWqaaeaabiGaciaacaqabeaadaqaaqaaaOqaaKqzGeGaamitaK qzadGaeyOhIukaaa@39EA@  values were obtained: Monte-Carlos Simulation, 31.26cm; Bhattacharya’s method, 30.11cm; VBGF, 37.06cm; Powell-Wetherall, 35.59cm and Jones and van Zalinge, 37.06cm. It was noted that the Monte-Carlos and Bhattacharya’s methods were simulative and could have recorded lower values due to individual variability in growth parameters, seasonal oscillation in growth, size-dependent selection, variable recruitment period and large length-class intervals used in grouping length data. It was also observed that Synodontis schall in lower River Benue attained its maximum length at age 3+ suggesting short longevity of lifespan. It was concluded that length-based age study was the most reliable approach in studying fish stocks in the tropics especially in these moments of ecosystem variability occasioned by global warming.

Keywords: Age; Length-Based; Synodontis Schall; Asymptotic Length; Lower River Benue

Introduction

The uncertain weather and climate regimen imposed by global warming in the tropics has made it even more difficult to assess the age of tropical fishes. This is because there are no clear-cut dry and wet seasons. Temperature which is the major determining factor in the assessment of age in fishes in erratically distributed all through the year and do not account for the rate of growth which is reflected on the hard parts as it is in temperate fishes. In spite of frequent criticism, the methods for the analysis of length frequency data have found, in the tropics, wider applications than the study of skeletal parts, while tagging studies have generally been under-utilized [1]. Fortunately, several numerical methods have been developed which allows the conversion of length-frequency data into age composition [2]. Petersen method (from length-frequency data) is seen as the most-handy method for age determination in the tropics. Many scientific approaches have been postulated by fisheries scientists in determining the age and growth of fish from their length data. These postulations are expressed in mathematical models of Walford [3]; Beverton and Holt [4]; Ursin [5]; Bhattacharya [6]; Ricker [7]; Pauly [1]; Von Bertalanffy [8]. Essential age and growth parameters obtained from these models apart from determining their length-at-age are asymptotic length ( L MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVCI8FfYJH8YrFfeuY=Hhbbf9v8qqaqFr0xc9pk0xbb a9q8WqFfeaY=biLkVcLq=JHqpepeea0=as0Fb9pgeaYRXxe9vr0=vr 0=vqpWqaaeaabiGaciaacaqabeaadaqaaqaaaOqaaKqzGeGaamitaK qzadGaeyOhIukaaa@39EA@ ), growth curvature (K), and so on. Recently, stock assessment has become very popular considering the dwelling concern of depleting tropical stock.

Synodontis schall is one of the most abundant species in the lower River Benue. Known for their hardness and robustness, they can tolerate the wide variation in the lower River Benue. Also, its rate of spoilage at catch is usually not high. These make the species a commercially important fish even though its size may not be really appealing. Studies on the species have become very elaborate among fisheries scientists in the tropics perhaps for these reasons. Abowei and Hart [9] worked on ten species (including Synodontis schall) in lower River Nun; Araoye et al. [10] worked on the age and growth of S. schall in Asa Lake, Nigeria but centered on age determination from hard parts; Akombo et al. [11] also reported on the age and growth of S. schall from the lower River Benue using hard parts (opercula bones). There are no reports on the age and growth of S. schall from the lower river Benue using length-frequency approach. This work is aimed at providing information on some age and growth indices of S. schall from lower Benue with focus on length-frequency approach. This is in view of the unreliability and inapplicability of hard parts and tagging methods respectively in the tropics. Such information is relevant in the formulation of useful policies in the management of the fisheries of lower River Benue especially of the species, S. schall. King [12] noted the difficulty experienced in managing fisheries of this kind of lower River Benue as the fishers are numerous and usually scattered in small communities. The poor coordination of fishermen makes it impossible to monitor their catches for sustainable yield. Also, this work attempts to compare the commonest length-frequency method of age and growth determination to note the variations that exists in their estimations.

Materials and Methods

Study area

This study was carried out on the lower River Benue at Makurdi. The Lower Benue River is the course of the Benue River that is runs within Benue and Kogi States of Nigeria [13]. River Benue originates from the Adamawa Mountains of Cameroun and flows west across East-Central Nigeria [14].

Commercial catches are landed at three major sites in Makurdi.

  1. Abinsi: this landing site is located in the out sketch of Makurdi Township (approximately 20km). It supplies catch mainly sold at the Abinsi Fish Market.
  2. Wurukum: this is located between the old and New Bridge. Fish sold at Wurukum Market are obtained from this landing site.
  3. Wadata: this is the major landing site of fish in Makurdi. Supplies from this site are majorly caught around the Agatu local government area of Benue State.

Collection of samples

Samples of Synodontis schall were obtained from the fishermen on their return from fishing to the landing sites. This was done forth-nightly for a period of 12 months (January-December, 2013) between the hours of 6-10am. A total of 963 samples were collected during the study period.

Analysis of samples

Monte Carlos Length-Frequency Simulation: this was evaluated from the Fish Stock Assessment Tool (FiSAT II) software. Figures obtained from recruitment analysis, growth parameters, mortality and gear selectivity were automatically used for simulating the life (growth, migration) of S. schall at the time of catch, from one sampling period to the next, until it dies due to natural or fishing mortality. A time series of length frequencies was generated which was presented on monthly basis by their ages [15].

Determinations of Age from Length-Frequencies using Bhattacharya’s Method: this was also determined using the Fish Stock Assessment Tool (FiSAT II) using the model

In ( N i+1 )  In ( N i ) =  a j +  b i L i MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVCI8FfYJH8YrFfeuY=Hhbbf9v8qqaqFr0xc9pk0xbb a9q8WqFfeaY=biLkVcLq=JHqpepeea0=as0Fb9pgeaYRXxe9vr0=vr 0=vqpWqaaeaabiGaciaacaqabeaadaqaaqaaaOqaaKqzGeaeaaaaaa aaa8qacaWGjbGaamOBaiaabccajuaGpaWaaeWaaOqaaKqzGeWdbiaa d6eal8aadaWgaaqaaKqzadWdbiaadMgacqGHRaWkcaaIXaaal8aabe aaaOGaayjkaiaawMcaaKqzGeWdbiaabccacaGGtaIaaeiiaiaadMea caWGUbGaaeiiaKqba+aadaqadaGcbaqcLbsapeGaamOtaKqba+aada WgaaWcbaqcLbmapeGaamyAaaWcpaqabaaakiaawIcacaGLPaaajugi b8qacaqGGaGaeyypa0Jaaeiiaiaadggal8aadaWgaaqaaKqzadWdbi aadQgaaSWdaeqaaKqzGeWdbiabgUcaRiaabccacaWGIbWcpaWaaSba aeaajugWa8qacaWGPbaal8aabeaajugib8qacaWGmbWcpaWaaSbaae aajugWa8qacaWGPbaal8aabeaaaaa@5C53@

Where

N i and  N i+1 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVCI8FfYJH8YrFfeuY=Hhbbf9v8qqaqFr0xc9pk0xbb a9q8WqFfeaY=biLkVcLq=JHqpepeea0=as0Fb9pgeaYRXxe9vr0=vr 0=vqpWqaaeaabiGaciaacaqabeaadaqaaqaaaOqaaKqzGeaeaaaaaa aaa8qacaWGobWcpaWaaSbaaeaajugWa8qacaWGPbaal8aabeaajugi b8qacaWGHbGaamOBaiaadsgacaqGGaGaamOtaSWdamaaBaaabaqcLb mapeGaamyAaiabgUcaRiaaigdaaSWdaeqaaaaa@42E3@  = were successive frequencies of the same component of a group of fish in a sample (i.e representing age group j) and where L i MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVCI8FfYJH8YrFfeuY=Hhbbf9v8qqaqFr0xc9pk0xbb a9q8WqFfeaY=biLkVcLq=JHqpepeea0=as0Fb9pgeaYRXxe9vr0=vr 0=vqpWqaaeaabiGaciaacaqabeaadaqaaqaaaOqaaKqzGeaeaaaaaa aaa8qacaWGmbWcpaWaaSbaaeaajugWa8qacaWGPbaal8aabeaaaaa@39EC@  Li was the upper class limit of N i MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVCI8FfYJH8YrFfeuY=Hhbbf9v8qqaqFr0xc9pk0xbb a9q8WqFfeaY=biLkVcLq=JHqpepeea0=as0Fb9pgeaYRXxe9vr0=vr 0=vqpWqaaeaabiGaciaacaqabeaadaqaaqaaaOqaaKqzGeaeaaaaaa aaa8qacaWGobWcpaWaaSbaaKqaGfaajugWa8qacaWGPbaajeaypaqa baaaaa@3AB7@ .

From this, the mean of the normal distribution was

L j =  a j / b j MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVCI8FfYJH8YrFfeuY=Hhbbf9v8qqaqFr0xc9pk0xbb a9q8WqFfeaY=biLkVcLq=JHqpepeea0=as0Fb9pgeaYRXxe9vr0=vr 0=vqpWqaaeaabiGaciaacaqabeaadaqaaqaaaOqaaKqzGeaeaaaaaa aaa8qacaWGmbqcfa4damaaBaaajeaybaqcLbmapeGaamOAaaqcba2d aeqaaKqzGeWdbiabg2da9iaabccacaWGHbWcpaWaaSbaaKqaGfaaju gWa8qacaWGQbaajeaypaqabaqcLbsapeGaai4laiaadkgal8aadaWg aaqcbawaaKqzadWdbiaadQgaaKqaG9aabeaaaaa@4736@

while its standard deviation (ϭ) was

6 j = ( Δ L / b j ) 1/2 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVCI8FfYJH8YrFfeuY=Hhbbf9v8qqaqFr0xc9pk0xbb a9q8WqFfeaY=biLkVcLq=JHqpepeea0=as0Fb9pgeaYRXxe9vr0=vr 0=vqpWqaaeaabiGaciaacaqabeaadaqaaqaaaOqaaKqzGeGaaGOnaS WaaSbaaWqaamaaBaaabaGaamOAaaqabaaabeaajugibiabg2da9Kqb aoaabmaakeaajugibiabgkHiTiabfs5aeLqbaoaaxadakeaajugibi aadYeaaSqaaKqzadGaeyOiGClaleaajugWaiabgkHiTaaajugibiaa c+cacaWGIbWcdaWgaaadbaGaamOAaaqabaaakiaawIcacaGLPaaalm aaCaaameqabaWaaWbaaeqabaGaaGymaiaac+cacaaIYaaaaaaaaaa@4C22@

where Δ L MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVCI8FfYJH8YrFfeuY=Hhbbf9v8qqaqFr0xc9pk0xbb a9q8WqFfeaY=biLkVcLq=JHqpepeea0=as0Fb9pgeaYRXxe9vr0=vr 0=vqpWqaaeaabiGaciaacaqabeaadaqaaqaaaOqaaKqzGeGaeuiLdq ucfa4aaCbmaOqaaKqzGeGaamitaaWcbaqcLbmacqGHIaYTaSqaaKqz adGaeyOeI0caaaaa@3F09@  was the constant class size.

Also, a separation index (SI) was computed.

SI = Δ L j /Δ 6 j MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVCI8FfYJH8YrFfeuY=Hhbbf9v8qqaqFr0xc9pk0xbb a9q8WqFfeaY=biLkVcLq=JHqpepeea0=as0Fb9pgeaYRXxe9vr0=vr 0=vqpWqaaeaabiGaciaacaqabeaadaqaaqaaaOqaaKqzGeaeaaaaaa aaa8qacaWGtbGaamysaiaabccacqGH9aqpcaqGGaGaeuiLdqucfa4a aCbmaOqaaKqzGeGaamitaaWcbaqcLbmacqGHIaYTaSqaaKqzadGaey OeI0caaKqbaoaaBaaabaqcLbmacaGGQbaajuaGbeaajugibiaac+ca cqqHuoarcaaI2aWcdaWgaaadbaGaaiOAaaqabaaaaa@4B02@

where  Δ L j MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVCI8FfYJH8YrFfeuY=Hhbbf9v8qqaqFr0xc9pk0xbb a9q8WqFfeaY=biLkVcLq=JHqpepeea0=as0Fb9pgeaYRXxe9vr0=vr 0=vqpWqaaeaabiGaciaacaqabeaadaqaaqaaaOqaaKqzGeaeaaaaaa aaa8qacaqGGaGaeuiLdqucfa4aaCbmaOqaaKqzGeGaamitaaWcbaqc LbmacqGHIaYTaSqaaKqzadGaeyOeI0caaSWaaSbaaWqaaiaacQgaae qaaaaa@40F2@  was the difference between two successive means, and ∆ϭj was the difference between their estimated standard deviations.

The separation of length-frequency samples into their components is an iterative process in that every identified component is subtracted from the remainder of the sample using the Gaussian function,

N 2i+1 = N i  + { ( 1/ 6 j 2π ).EXP( ( L i L j ) 2 ) } MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVCI8FfYJH8YrFfeuY=Hhbbf9v8qqaqFr0xc9pk0xbb a9q8WqFfeaY=biLkVcLq=JHqpepeea0=as0Fb9pgeaYRXxe9vr0=vr 0=vqpWqaaeaabiGaciaacaqabeaadaqaaqaaaOqaaKqzGeGaamOtaS WaaSbaaWqaaiaaikdacaWGPbGaey4kaSIaaGymaaqabaqcLbsacqGH 9aqpcaWGobWcdaWgaaadbaGaamyAaaqabaqcLbsaqaaaaaaaaaWdbi aacckacqGHRaWkcaGGGcGaeyOeI0scfa4aaiWaaOqaaKqbaoaabmaa keaajugibiaaigdacaGGVaGaaGOnaSWaaSbaaWqaaiaadQgaaeqaaK qbaoaakaaakeaajugibiaaikdacqaHapaCaSqabaaakiaawIcacaGL Paaajugibiaac6cacaWGfbGaamiwaiaadcfajuaGdaqadaGcbaqcLb sacqGHsisljuaGdaqadaGcbaqcLbsacaWGmbWcdaWgaaadbaGaamyA aaqabaqcLbsacqGHsislcaWGmbWcdaWgaaadbaGaamOAaaqabaaaki aawIcacaGLPaaalmaaCaaameqabaGaaGOmaaaaaOGaayjkaiaawMca aaGaay5Eaiaaw2haaaaa@6031@

Where Ni+ referred to the previous set of frequencies and N2i+ the new set of frequencies, less the component identified so far.

The mean length groups as well as their frequencies and standard deviations were generated for each age group after connecting the points. The length-frequencies generated from the Bhattacharya’s method was further refined using NORMSEP which applied the maximum likelihood concept to separation of the normally distributed components of size-frequency samples [15].

Determinations of L MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVCI8FfYJH8YrFfeuY=Hhbbf9v8qqaqFr0xc9pk0xbb a9q8WqFfeaY=biLkVcLq=JHqpepeea0=as0Fb9pgeaYRXxe9vr0=vr 0=vqpWqaaeaabiGaciaacaqabeaadaqaaqaaaOqaaKqzGeGaamitaK qzadGaeyOhIukaaa@39EA@ and K using VBGF: The von Bertalanfy Growth Function (VBGF) was evaluated from the Fish Stock Assessment Tool (FiSAT II) software using ELEFAN I. Lengths of the fish samples were grouped in the class intervals of 3cm and fitted into Length-frequency plot to generate the L and K from the von Bertalanfy Growth Function (VBGF)

L (t) = L *  [ 1  exp ( K*( t   t 0 ) ) ] MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVCI8FfYJH8YrFfeuY=Hhbbf9v8qqaqFr0xc9pk0xbb a9q8WqFfeaY=biLkVcLq=JHqpepeea0=as0Fb9pgeaYRXxe9vr0=vr 0=vqpWqaaeaabiGaciaacaqabeaadaqaaqaaaOqaaKqzGeaeaaaaaa aaa8qacaWGmbWcdaWgaaadbaWdamaaBaaabaGaaiika8qacaWG0bWd aiaacMcaaeqaaaWdbeqaaKqzGeGaeyypa0JaamitaSWaaSbaaWqaa8 aadaWgaaqaa8qacqGHEisPa8aabeaaa8qabeaalmaaCaaameqabaGa aiOkaaaajugibiaabccajuaGpaWaamWaaKGbagaajugib8qacaaIXa GaaeiiaiaacobicaqGGaGaamyzaiaadIhacaWGWbGaaeiiaKqba+aa daqadaqcgayaaKqzGeWdbiabgkHiTiaadUeajugWaiaacQcajuaGpa WaaeWaaKGbagaajugib8qacaWG0bGaaeiiaiabgkHiTiaabccacaWG 0bWcdaWgaaadbaGaaGimaaqabaaajyaGpaGaayjkaiaawMcaaaGaay jkaiaawMcaaaGaay5waiaaw2faaaaa@5AC5@

Restructured frequencies were used to determine the ages with lines connecting cohorts on the frequency bars [15].

Determinations of L MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVCI8FfYJH8YrFfeuY=Hhbbf9v8qqaqFr0xc9pk0xbb a9q8WqFfeaY=biLkVcLq=JHqpepeea0=as0Fb9pgeaYRXxe9vr0=vr 0=vqpWqaaeaabiGaciaacaqabeaadaqaaqaaaOqaaKqzGeGaamitaK qzadGaeyOhIukaaa@39EA@  using Powell-Wetherall Plot: was evaluated from the Fish Stock Assessment Tool (FiSAT II) software of constant class intervals of 3cm. The computation took into account the smallest length fully recruited by the gear (L', or cut-off length).

( L    L ' ) = a + b.  L ' MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVCI8FfYJH8YrFfeuY=Hhbbf9v8qqaqFr0xc9pk0xbb a9q8WqFfeaY=biLkVcLq=JHqpepeea0=as0Fb9pgeaYRXxe9vr0=vr 0=vqpWqaaeaabiGaciaacaqabeaadaqaaqaaaOqaaKqbaoaabmaajy aGbaqcfaieaaaaaaaaa8qadaWfWaqcgayaaKqzGeGaamitaaqcgaya aKqzadGaeyOiGClajyaGbaqcLbmacqGHsislaaqcLbsacaqGGaGaey OeI0IaaeiiaiaadYealmaaCaaameqabaGaai4jaaaaaKGba+aacaGL OaGaayzkaaqcLbsapeGaaeiiaiabg2da9iaabccacaWGHbGaaeiiai abgUcaRiaabccacaWGIbGaaiOlaiaabccacaWGmbWcdaahaaadbeqa aiaacEcaaaaaaa@5066@

Where

L  = [ L+L' / 1 + ( Z/K ) ] MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVCI8FfYJH8YrFfeuY=Hhbbf9v8qqaqFr0xc9pk0xbb a9q8WqFfeaY=biLkVcLq=JHqpepeea0=as0Fb9pgeaYRXxe9vr0=vr 0=vqpWqaaeaabiGaciaacaqabeaadaqaaqaaaOqaaKqbacbaaaaaaa aapeWaaCbmaKGbagaajugibiaadYeaaKGbagaajugibiabgkci3cqc gayaaKqzGeGaeyOeI0caaiaabccacqGH9aqpcaqGGaqcfa4damaadm aajyaGbaqcLbsapeGaamitaiabg6HiLkabgUcaRiaadYeacaGGNaGa aeiiaiaac+cacaqGGaGaaGymaiaabccacqGHRaWkcaqGGaqcfa4dam aabmaajyaGbaqcLbsapeGaamOwaiaac+cacaWGlbaajyaGpaGaayjk aiaawMcaaaGaay5waiaaw2faaaaa@535C@

from which   L= a/b MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVCI8FfYJH8YrFfeuY=Hhbbf9v8qqaqFr0xc9pk0xbb a9q8WqFfeaY=biLkVcLq=JHqpepeea0=as0Fb9pgeaYRXxe9vr0=vr 0=vqpWqaaeaabiGaciaacaqabeaadaqaaqaaaOqaaKqbaoaaBaaajy aGbaqcLbsaqaaaaaaaaaWdbiaacckaaKGba+aabeaajugibiaadYea jugWaiabg6HiLMqzGeWdbiabg2da9iaabccacqGHsislcaWGHbGaai 4laiaadkgaaaa@434E@ , and Z/K =  ( 1 +b ) / b. MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVCI8FfYJH8YrFfeuY=Hhbbf9v8qqaqFr0xc9pk0xbb a9q8WqFfeaY=biLkVcLq=JHqpepeea0=as0Fb9pgeaYRXxe9vr0=vr 0=vqpWqaaeaabiGaciaacaqabeaadaqaaqaaaOqaaKqzGeaeaaaaaa aaa8qacaWGAbGaai4laiaadUeacaqGGaGaeyypa0JaaeiiaiabgkHi TiaabccajuaGpaWaaeWaaKGbagaajugib8qacaaIXaGaaeiiaiabgU caRiaadkgaaKGba+aacaGLOaGaayzkaaqcLbsapeGaaeiiaiaac+ca caqGGaGaamOyaiaac6caaaa@4822@

The L MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVCI8FfYJH8YrFfeuY=Hhbbf9v8qqaqFr0xc9pk0xbb a9q8WqFfeaY=biLkVcLq=JHqpepeea0=as0Fb9pgeaYRXxe9vr0=vr 0=vqpWqaaeaabiGaciaacaqabeaadaqaaqaaaOqaaKqzGeGaamitaK qzadGaeyOhIukaaa@39EA@  and Z/K values were determined from the plot which as well generated the regression function relating the Ḹ - L' and L'(cut-off length) [15].

Determinations of L MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVCI8FfYJH8YrFfeuY=Hhbbf9v8qqaqFr0xc9pk0xbb a9q8WqFfeaY=biLkVcLq=JHqpepeea0=as0Fb9pgeaYRXxe9vr0=vr 0=vqpWqaaeaabiGaciaacaqabeaadaqaaqaaaOqaaKqzGeGaamitaK qzadGaeyOhIukaaa@39EA@  using Jones and van Zalinge Plot: the Jones and van Zalinge plot was also plotted from the Fish Stock Assessment Tool (FiSAT II) software using length frequency-data of constant interval [15].

L MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVCI8FfYJH8YrFfeuY=Hhbbf9v8qqaqFr0xc9pk0xbb a9q8WqFfeaY=biLkVcLq=JHqpepeea0=as0Fb9pgeaYRXxe9vr0=vr 0=vqpWqaaeaabiGaciaacaqabeaadaqaaqaaaOqaaKqzGeGaamitaK qzadGaeyOhIukaaa@39EA@ was determined from the equation:

In( C Li ) = a + b.In ( L   L i ) MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVCI8FfYJH8YrFfeuY=Hhbbf9v8qqaqFr0xc9pk0xbb a9q8WqFfeaY=biLkVcLq=JHqpepeea0=as0Fb9pgeaYRXxe9vr0=vr 0=vqpWqaaeaabiGaciaacaqabeaadaqaaqaaaOqaaKqzGeaeaaaaaa aaa8qacaWGjbGaamOBaKqba+aadaqadaqcgayaaKqzGeWdbiaadoea l8aadaWgaaadbaWaaSbaaeaapeGaamitaiaadMgacqGHEisPa8aabe aaaeqaaaqcgaOaayjkaiaawMcaaKqzGeWdbiaabccacqGH9aqpcaqG GaGaamyyaiaabccacqGHRaWkcaqGGaGaamOyaiaac6cacaWGjbGaam OBaiaabccajuaGpaWaaeWaaKGbagaajugib8qacaWGmbWcpaWaaSba aWqaamaaBaaabaWdbiabg6HiLcWdaeqaaaqabaqcLbsapeGaeyOeI0 IaaeiiaiaadYeal8aadaWgaaadbaWaaSbaaeaapeGaamyAaaWdaeqa aaqabaaajyaGcaGLOaGaayzkaaaaaa@55D4@

Where C Li MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVCI8FfYJH8YrFfeuY=Hhbbf9v8qqaqFr0xc9pk0xbb a9q8WqFfeaY=biLkVcLq=JHqpepeea0=as0Fb9pgeaYRXxe9vr0=vr 0=vqpWqaaeaabiGaciaacaqabeaadaqaaqaaaOqaaKqzGeaeaaaaaa aaa8qacaWGdbWcpaWaaSbaaWqaamaaBaaabaWdbiaadYeacaWGPbGa eyOhIukapaqabaaabeaaaaa@3B19@  was the cumulative catch (computed from the highest length class with non-zero catch) corresponding to class i and Li was the lower limit of the length class. The slope b was an estimate of Z/K.

Results and Discussion

Monte carlos simulation of length-frequency

Table 1 presents the results of S. schall in lower river Benue. The simulation of age based on a body length had S. schall living up to age 3+ between the months of May to September which coincided with the rainy season. The age class with the highest frequency was age 1+ which had 242 (25.12%) of the 963 samples analysed during the 12-month study. Age 3+ had the least frequency (1.97%) during the period of study. There was a progression in the length-at-age. The length at age 0+ was simulated as 15.34±2.63 cm, age 1+ as 25.25±3.95cm, age 2+ as 25.25±3.95cm and age 3+ as 31.26±3.24cm. In these simulations, it may be concluded that the L MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVCI8FfYJH8YrFfeuY=Hhbbf9v8qqaqFr0xc9pk0xbb a9q8WqFfeaY=biLkVcLq=JHqpepeea0=as0Fb9pgeaYRXxe9vr0=vr 0=vqpWqaaeaabiGaciaacaqabeaadaqaaqaaaOqaaKqzGeGaamitaK qzadGaeyOhIukaaa@39EA@ was the age at its oldest age (31.26±3.24cm). In corollary, it may also be said that Synodontis schall could live up to age 3+ considering the prevailing ecological conditions of lower river Benue (Figure 1).

Month

Frequency/ Lengths

Mean Avg (yr)

0+

1+

2+

3+

January

Frequency

33

37

30

0

Mean±SD

8.69±8.59

14.01±13.68

17.78±12.58

-

February

Frequency

18

14

18

0

Mean±SD

16.67±3.03

25.14±4.88

29.50±3.09

-

March

Frequency

13

23

14

0

Mean±SD

19.65±4.34

26.85±4.37

28.50±3.35

-

April

Frequency

14

18

18

0

Mean±SD

18.57±2.49

27.67±4.73

28.94±4.18

-

May

Frequency

15

16

18

1

Mean±SD

20.90±3.20

28.00±5.55

29.61±3.27

30.50±29.00

June

Frequency

19

14

16

1

Mean±SD

20.39±3.54

25.36±6.06

27.38±4.98

32.50±33.00

July

Frequency

6

20

19

5

Mean±SD

21.50±3.16

24.85±4.96

29.61±3.49

31.30±4.15

August

Frequency

3

23

16

8

Mean±SD

9.50±16.40

27.15±3.76

28.81±5.12

30.50±3.38

September

Frequency

5

24

17

4

Mean±SD

12.10±1.52

25.17±4.67

28.50±3.78

31.50±4.83

October

Frequency

11

22

17

0

Mean±SD

7.95±2.46

25.68±3.67

26.74±3.96

-

November

Frequency

11

15

24

0

Mean±SD

13.14±3.67

26.17±5.02

28.46±4.32

-

December

Frequency

15

16

19

0

Mean±SD

15.03±3.64

26.94±3.97

29.76±3.71

-

Mean

15.34±2.63

25.25±3.95

27.80±3.56

31.26±3.24

Table 1: Monte Carlos simulation of Length-Frequency of Synodontis schall in lower River Benue.

Figure 1: Bhattacharya’s Method of Normal Age Distribution of Synodontis schall in lower River Benue.

Age determination from length-frequencies using Bhattacharya’s method: The Bhattacharya’s method of age determination is presented in figure 1. Age 0+ was determined on the Bhattacharya’s method of age determination to be 10.44±2.18cm; age 1+ as 19.84±2.65cm; age 2+ as 28.28±2.56cm and age 3+ as 30.11±3.15cm. The fish samples with the highest frequency in the length class 8-14cm (Figure 2).

Age determination from length-frequencies using Powell-Wetherall plot: The Powell-Wetherall plot presented in figure 3 estimated the asymptotic length L MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVCI8FfYJH8YrFfeuY=Hhbbf9v8qqaqFr0xc9pk0xbb a9q8WqFfeaY=biLkVcLq=JHqpepeea0=as0Fb9pgeaYRXxe9vr0=vr 0=vqpWqaaeaabiGaciaacaqabeaadaqaaqaaaOqaaKqzGeGaamitaK qzadGaeyOhIukaaa@39EA@ to be 35.59cm. The Z/K was 3.18 while the function was Y=8.50 + (-239)*X (Figure 3).

Age determination from length-frequencies using Jones and van Zalinge plot: The Jones and van Zalinge Plot is presented in figure 4. The asymptotic length L MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVCI8FfYJH8YrFfeuY=Hhbbf9v8qqaqFr0xc9pk0xbb a9q8WqFfeaY=biLkVcLq=JHqpepeea0=as0Fb9pgeaYRXxe9vr0=vr 0=vqpWqaaeaabiGaciaacaqabeaadaqaaqaaaOqaaKqzGeGaamitaK qzadGaeyOhIukaaa@39EA@ was estimated to be 37.06cm while the Z/K was 1.80 (Figure 4).

The asymptotic length of the various methods: The asymptotic length of S. schall in lower River Benue from the various methods used in the research is presented in Table 2. Although it was impossible to subject the asymptotic lengths to an ANOVA test (because they were mean values without replication), it is clear to note that the asymptotic lengths, L MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVCI8FfYJH8YrFfeuY=Hhbbf9v8qqaqFr0xc9pk0xbb a9q8WqFfeaY=biLkVcLq=JHqpepeea0=as0Fb9pgeaYRXxe9vr0=vr 0=vqpWqaaeaabiGaciaacaqabeaadaqaaqaaaOqaaKqzGeGaamitaK qzadGaeyOhIukaaa@39EA@ for VBGF (37.06cm), Powell-Wetherall plot (35.59cm) and Jones and van Zalinge plot (37.06cm) were close to each other in value. The lengths at age 3+ which were estimated at the oldest age of S. schall were considered as the asymptotic lengths, L MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVCI8FfYJH8YrFfeuY=Hhbbf9v8qqaqFr0xc9pk0xbb a9q8WqFfeaY=biLkVcLq=JHqpepeea0=as0Fb9pgeaYRXxe9vr0=vr 0=vqpWqaaeaabiGaciaacaqabeaadaqaaqaaaOqaaKqzGeGaamitaK qzadGaeyOhIukaaa@39EA@ . The values of Monte-Carlo simulation (31.26cm) and Bhattacharya’s method (30.11cm) were comparably lower. The research came up with findings that S. schall in Lower River Benue grew up to three years and attained an asymptotic length ranging 30.11-37.06cm. It can be asserted that there were no tangible variations in the value of the asymptotic length reported by the five approaches. The reports of Abowei and Hart [9] of S. schall having an asymptotic length of 38.7cm in lower River Nun was close to the range of values reported in this work. The variation in the value may be attributed to ecosystem variability in terms of food resource abundance and favorable physico-chemical conditions. Sparre et al [2] reported that growth of fishes differed from species to species and from stock to stock even within the same species as a result of different environmental conditions. It was also observed that the fish attained its asymptotic length within three years (age 3+). According to Lowe-McConnell [16] aquatic organisms at lower trophic levels attain their maximum lengths and sexual maturity within short periods so as to gain the opportunity to raise succeeding progenies to replenish their populations. More so, the compensatory exogenous factors life food abundance, under-exploitation and ideal water conditions that could have enhanced its prolonged lifespan were unfavorable. Alliot et al. [17] and Wassef and El-Emary [18] submitted that apart from endogenous attributes like genotype and physiological conditions, the external environmental conditions as well as habitat resources promotes the lifespan of a fish species. King [19] also attributed the differences in maximum size attained by fish in different water bodies to noise from outboard engines and industrial activities. The asymptotic lengths obtained from the Monte-Carlos (31.26cm) and Bhattacharya’s (30.11cm) methods were both simulative. This could have explained their comparably lower L. Isaac [20] reported that simulations from ELEFAN I are often biased due to factors such as individual variability in growth parameters, seasonal oscillation in growth, size-dependent selection, variable recruitment period and large length-class intervals used in grouping length data. Akombo et al. [11] worked on the same species using two different approaches and obtained 28.50cm (Ford-Walford plots) and 20.36cm (at age 3+ from back-calculations using hard parts) while its length at age 4+ (which was the oldest age ) was 21.85cm. El-Kasheif et al. [21] also obtained a back-calculated of the fish in River Nile as 24.93cm at age 3+ while the asymptotic length was calculated as 63.15cm. The values obtained from these works were comparably lower. It may be argued that since values obtained from this work were length-dependent, they may tend to be more reliable as has been earlier confirmed by Sparre et al. [2].

Figure 2: Von Bertalanfy Growth Function (VBGF) of Synodontis schall in lower River Benue.

Figure 3: Powell-Wetherall Plot of Synodontis schall in lower River Benue.

Figure 4: Jones and van Zalinge Plot of Synodontis schall in lower River Benue.

Length-Based Method

Asymptotic Length (cm)

Monte-Carlos Simulation (Length at age 3+)

31.26

Bhattacharya’s Method (Length at age 3+)

30.11

von Bertalanfy Growth Function, VBGF

37.06

Powell-Wetherall Plot

35.59

Jones and van Zalinge Plot

37.06

Table 2: Asymptotic Length of S. schall from the various methods.

Conclusion

It was also observed that Synodontis schall in lower River Benue attained its maximum length at age 3+ suggesting short longevity of lifespan. It was also concluded that length-based age study was the most reliable approach in studying fish stocks in the tropics especially in these moments of ecosystem variability occasioned by global warming.

References

  1. Pauly D (1983) Some Simple Methods for the Assessment of Tropical Fish Stocks. FAO Tech 234: 52.
  2. Sparre P, Ursin E, Venema SC (1992) Introduction to Tropical Fish Stock Assessment, Part 1 Manual. FAO Fisheries Technical Rome, FAO, Denmark 306: 337.
  3. Walford LA (1946) A New Graphic Method of Describing the Growth of Animals. Biol Bull Mar Biol Lab Woods Hole 90: 141-147
  4. Beverton RJH, SJ Holt (1959) A Review of the Lifespan and Mortality Rates of Fish in Nature and the Relation to Growth and other Physiological Characteristics. In Wolstehnolmen GEW & MO Connor (Eds.), Ciba Foundation Coloquium on Ageing: The Lifespan of Animals Churchill, London 5: 142-177.
  5. Ursin E (1973) On the Prey Size-preference of Cod and Dab. Meddr Danm Fisk Havunders NS 7: 58-98.
  6. Bhattacharya CG (1967) A Simple Method of Resolution into Gaussian Components. Biometrics 23(1):115-135.
  7. Ricker WE (1975) Computation and Interpretation of Biological Statistics of Fish Populations. Bull Fish Res Board Can 191: 382.
  8. Bertalanffy L von (1938) A Quantitative Theory of Organic Growth. (Inquiries on Growth Laws II). Hum Biol 10(2): 181-213.
  9. Abowei JFN, Hart AI (2009) Some Morphometric Parameters of Ten Species from the lower Nun River, Niger Delta. Res J Bio Sci 4(3): 282-288.
  10. Araoye PA, Fagade SO, Jeje CY (2002) Age and Growth Study of Synodontis schall (Teleostei:Mochokidae) in the Environment of Asa Dam, Ilorin, Nigeria. Nig J Pure and Appl Sci 17: 1235-1243.
  11. Akombo PM, Akange ET, Atile JI (2015) Age and Growth of Synodontis schall (Bloch and Schneider, 1801) in the Lower Benue River at Makurdi, Nigeria. Int J Fish Aquat Sci 2(5): 184-190.
  12. King RP (1997) Growth Performance of Nigerian Fish Stocks. NAGA, ICLARM Quarterly 20(2): 31-35.
  13. Reid MG, Sydenhan HL (1979) A Check-list of lower Benue River fishes. Icthyo-Geographical Review of the Benue River, West-Africa. J Nat History 13: 14-67.
  14. Nedeco (1959) Studies and Recommendations: Improvement of Niger and Benue Rivers. Amsterdam, North Holland Publishing Company 19-27.
  15. Gayanilo FC, Sparre P, D Pauly (2005) FAO-ICLARM Stock Assessment Tools. Food and Agriculture Organisation 8: 168.
  16. Lowe-Connell RH (1987) Ecological Studies in Tropical Fish communities. Cambridge University Press, England, p. 73.
  17. Alliot EA, A Pastoureaud H Thebault (1983) Influence of Temperature and salinity on Growth and Body Composition of Sea Bass Fingerlings. Dicentrarchus labrax Aquaculture 31: 181-194.
  18. Wassef E, H El-Emary (1989) Contributions to the Biology of Bass, Dicentrarchus labrax L. in the Egyptian Mediterranean Waters off Alexandria. Cybium 13: 327-345.
  19. King RP (1996) Population Dynamics of the Mudskipper, Penophthalinus barbus (Gobidae) in the Estuarine Swamps of Cross River, Nigeria. J Aquat Sci 11: 31-34.
  20. Isaac VJ (1990) The Accuracy of Some Length-Based Methods for Fish Population Studies. ICLARM Tech Rep 27: 81.
  21. El-Kashief MA, MMN Authman, SA Ibrahim (2012) Environmental Studies on Synodontis schall (Bloch and Schneider, 1801) (Pisces:Siluriformes:Mochokidae) in the River nile at Gizza Sector,Egypt: Biological Aspects and Population Dynamics. J Fish Aquat Sci 7(2): 104-133.
Creative Commons Attribution License

©2017 Terhemen, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.