MOJ eISSN: 2576-4519 MOJABB

Applied Bionics and Biomechanics
Research Article
Volume 2 Issue 2

The clinically and biomechanically based optimization of sagittal contour surgical correction of the injured segment with the anterior subaxial fusion

Ievgenii I Slynko, Alexey S Nekhlopochin
Department of spinal cord and spine pathology, Romodanov Neurosurgery Institute of National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine
Received: April 12, 2018 | Published: April 19, 2018

Correspondence: Alexey S Nekhlopochin, Department of spinal cord and spine pathology, Romodanov Neurosurgery Institute of National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine, Tel +3804 4483 9413, Email

Citation: Slynko II, Nekhlopochin AS. The clinically and biomechanically based optimization of sagittal contour surgical correction of the injured segment with the anterior subaxial fusion. MOJ App Bio Biomech. 2018;2(2):150‒155. DOI: 10.15406/mojabb.2018.02.00058

Abstract

The anterior decompression-fusion surgery is currently the most effective treatment method for number of pathological conditions and traumatic injuries of the cervical spine. The study is devoted to the surgery and implant optimization, to achieve the optimal state of sagittal kyphosis in patients after anterior subaxial cervical fusion. The retrospective analysis of 151 clinical cases was held; the nonlinear dependence of the final results of treatment on the degree of correction was revealed using regression analysis, the finite element analysis of the cervical spine models with different parameters of segmental kyphosis of the operated segment was carried out. As a result, the optimal parameters of sagittal contour correction of the operated cervical spine were determined.

Keywords: subaxial level, implanted systems, surgical, technical issues, clinical efficiency, body-replacing

Introduction

Decompression-fusion surgery is the most common method of correction of the subaxial cervical spine traumatic injury, accompanied by compression of neural structures.1,2 Vertical cylindrical cancellous implant (mesh cage or mesh) has been widely used as a body-replacing structure for the last few decades. The literature analysis demonstrates a high clinical efficiency of combined application of mesh and anterior rigid plate.3 At the same time a number of authors report rather high frequency of unsatisfactory results such as dislocation, migration, fragmentation of the implanted systems, loss of intraoperative correction and the neural disorder increasing.4–7 Despite the rather contradictory assessment, the combined use of mesh and anterior rigid plate de facto is the standard for decompression-fusion surgery at the subaxial level of the cervical spine.5 At the same time, technical issues of surgical correction are described quite poorly. Currently, there is no consensus about optimal correction of the operated vertebral segment height and the formation of a certain segmental kyphosis of the cervical spine in the surgical intervention area.8 Subjective approach often leads to unsatisfactory results and loss of achieved correction in the long-term postoperative period.9

Object

To improve the state of sagittal kyphosis of the operated segment in the delayed patients' postoperative period, who underwent anterior subaxial fusion using the combination of mesh and rigid plate.

Research design

Retrospective estimation and analysis of the spondylometry sagittal kyphosis state of the operated spine segment just after fusion and 1 year later;

  1. Statistical analysis and the correlation determination of the final results depend on the intraoperative correction value;
  2. The determination of ranges of the sagittal kyphosis intraoperative values that are forming various biomechanic cervical spine responses in the delayed postoperative period;
  3. Identification of the peculiarities of the stress-strain state of the cervical spine when modeling anterior subaxial fusion with different degrees of correction.

Materials and method

We performed retrospective analysis of the surgery results of patients with traumatic cervical spine injury that had been hospitalized in the spinal cord and spine pathology department of Romodanov Neurosurgery Institute of National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine in the period from 2006 to 2016. The inclusion items were the following:

  1. The presence of traumatic injuries of the cervical spine on the subaxial (C3-C7) level, requiring decompression and fusion surgery;
  2. Performed surgery: resection of the compressed vertebral body and bisegmental fusion with mesh implant and anterior rigid plate;
  3. The intraoperative X-ray films are available in the clinic archives (produced during surgery after the system placement and before wound suturing) and control radiographs, that were made in the period of 12-14 months from the date of surgery.

151 medical cases were chosen satisfying the above mentioned parameters.

Spondylometry technique

The state of the operated spine segment was evaluated as segmental kyphosis (SK). The measurement was performed with two methods:

  1. The classical method of measuring sagittal contour is to determine the Cobb Angle (CA). In our research, the measurement of the CA was executed between the contralateral surfaces the vertebral bodies adjacent to the resected. The positive values of the obtained CA corresponded to the kyphotic deformation of the analyzed vertebral segment, and the negative values to lordosis. It should be noted that, concerning the cervical spine, the CA evaluation technique has a sufficiently high error, that is associated with significant anatomical variability of the cervical vertebral body surface and the level of spondylosis severity. So, it makes it difficult to conduct a line parallel to the surface of the vertebral body.
  2. As an alternative way of measuring was used the posterior tangent method, that means conducting lines parallel to the rear surface of the vertebral bodies.10 As to the cervical spine, the technique is anatomically more reasonable, but requires a higher quality Х-ray films.
  3. In order to obtain more objective data and reduce the error, the values were calculated as the average of the SK index determined by different methods. The radiographs processing was executed using the software product RadiAnt DICOM Viewer 4.2.1 demo version, which allows you to perform measurements with an exactness of 0,10. For each clinical case was defined both the value of intraoperative segmental kyphosis (SKint) and control radiographs (SKfin).

Statistical analysis

We determined the dependence of the final values of SK on the values of SK achieved during decompression-fusion surgery. Based on the analysis of roentgenogram SKfin=f(SKint) was calculated. Taking into account the specifics of the distribution of the analyzed values, a nonlinear regression analysis with least squares principle was used to identify the mathematical dependence. Levenberg – Marquardt algorithm was used as an optimization method. Evaluation of the suitability of the model was carried out by calculating the determination coefficient R2. The correlation matrix was analyzed to exclude unnecessary parameters of the model. The statistical significance of the calculated coefficients of the model was estimated using the criterion χ2. The residual analysis was executed by evaluating the distribution normality using Kolmogorov-Smirnov criterion and analyzing normal and semi-normal graphs. Cluster analysis was executed by the K-means method. Statistical confidence was estimated by analyzing the sum of squares of deviations between the cluster centers and the sums of squares of deviations of objects from the cluster center. The calculations are carried out with the use of statistical and analytical package Statistica 10.

Estimation of the stress-strain state

The finite -element analysis of the designed models of the human cervical spine in the area from the C3 vertebra to the C7 vertebra was executed. The C5 vertebra was replaced with a vertical cylindrical mesh implant, the stabilization was supplemented with anterior rigid plate with fixed screws. The models had different values of SK spine segment in zone of “operation”. The stress-strain state of the models was studied in the following loading options: compression, bending forward, bending backward and rotational effects. The model had rigid fixing at the bottom plane of the vertebral body C7 and joint masses. The load intensity on the models was 100 H. Compression loading was carried out by the distributed loading 36 N on the top surface of a body of a vertebra of C3 and 32 N on the top plane of its arc joints. Forward bending was simulated by a load of 100 N on the anterior edge of the vertebral body C3, backward bending – by a load of 50 N on its arcs. The rotational load was carried out by force of 100 N on the upper surface of the vertebral body C3. Von Mises tension was used to estimate the stress- strain state of the models.11

Results

The spondylometry data is shown in Figure 1. Following the above mentioned method, the average values were analyzed. When using different methods for the SK determination, the maximum difference was 1,20, the average of the module difference for all clinical cases 0,2840±0,0460, that indicates a high results comparability (correlation r=0,97). A visual analysis of the distribution allows to suggest that the optimal function with the least number of coefficients is a parabola ( y=a x 2 +bx+c ) MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfa4aaeWaae aaqaaaaaaaaaWdbiaadMhacqGH9aqpcaWGHbGaamiEa8aadaahaaqa beaajugWa8qacaaIYaaaaKqbakabgUcaRiaadkgacaWG4bGaey4kaS Iaam4yaaWdaiaawIcacaGLPaaaaaa@436C@ . During the relevant calculations, the assumption is confirmed by a sufficiently high value of the coefficient of determination (R2=0,8914). Model characteristics is defined in the third iteration. As a result, the function is revealed which describes the nature of the dependence of the analyzed indicators the most effectively: S K fin =0,182626*S K int 2 +1,85793*S K int +2,92143 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qacaWGtbGaam4sa8aadaWgaaqaaKqzadWdbiaadAgacaWGPbGa amOBaaqcfa4daeqaa8qacqGH9aqpcaaIWaGaaiilaiaaigdacaaI4a GaaGOmaiaaiAdacaaIYaGaaGOnaiaacQcacaWGtbGaam4saSWdamaa BaaajuaGbaqcLbmapeGaamyAaiaad6gacaWG0baajuaGpaqabaWaaW baaeqabaqcLbmapeGaaGOmaaaajuaGcqGHRaWkcaaIXaGaaiilaiaa iIdacaaI1aGaaG4naiaaiMdacaaIZaGaaiOkaiaadofacaWGlbWcpa WaaSbaaKqbagaajugWa8qacaWGPbGaamOBaiaadshaaKqba+aabeaa peGaey4kaSIaaGOmaiaacYcacaaI5aGaaGOmaiaaigdacaaI0aGaaG 4maaaa@628C@ The analysis of the correlation matrix demonstrates quite convincingly the absence of unnecessary components of the reduced formula (Table 1). Attention is paid to the sufficiently high value of correlation S K fin =0,182626*S K int 2 +1,85793*S K int +2,92143 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qacaWGtbGaam4sa8aadaWgaaqaaKqzadWdbiaadAgacaWGPbGa amOBaaqcfa4daeqaa8qacqGH9aqpcaaIWaGaaiilaiaaigdacaaI4a GaaGOmaiaaiAdacaaIYaGaaGOnaiaacQcacaWGtbGaam4saSWdamaa BaaajuaGbaqcLbmapeGaamyAaiaad6gacaWG0baajuaGpaqabaWaaW baaeqabaqcLbmapeGaaGOmaaaajuaGcqGHRaWkcaaIXaGaaiilaiaa iIdacaaI1aGaaG4naiaaiMdacaaIZaGaaiOkaiaadofacaWGlbWcpa WaaSbaaKqbagaajugWa8qacaWGPbGaamOBaiaadshaaKqba+aabeaa peGaey4kaSIaaGOmaiaacYcacaaI5aGaaGOmaiaaigdacaaI0aGaaG 4maaaa@628C@ and b MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qacaWGIbaaaa@378B@ coefficients of the model, which is naturally explained by a fairly narrow range of initial values (Table 2). The residual analysis results (Figure 2) are also testified in favor of adequacy of the received model. Thus, the evaluation demonstrates a sufficiently high representativeness and predictive efficiency of the obtained dependence. The next stage of the analysis was to assess the nature of the deviation of real indicators from the predicted values. The visual evaluation of the graph of distribution (Figure 1) allows to mark out 3 ranges S K int MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qacaWGtbGaam4saSWdamaaBaaajuaGbaqcLbmapeGaamyAaiaa d6gacaWG0baajuaGpaqabaaaaa@3DCA@ t which S K fin MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qacaWGtbGaam4saSWdamaaBaaajuaGbaqcLbmapeGaamOzaiaa dMgacaWGUbaajuaGpaqabaaaaa@3DBC@ shows the specificity of dispersion relative to S K fin =f( S K int ) MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qacaWGtbGaam4sa8aadaWgaaqaaKqzadWdbiaadAgacaWGPbGa amOBaaqcfa4daeqaa8qacqGH9aqpcaWGMbWdamaabmaabaWdbiaado facaWGlbWcpaWaaSbaaKqbagaajugWa8qacaWGPbGaamOBaiaadsha aKqba+aabeaaaiaawIcacaGLPaaaaaa@47F2@ . The following tendency revealed:

  1. Range S K int 3, 5 0 ..0 0 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qacaWGtbGaam4saSWdamaaBaaajuaGbaqcLbmapeGaamyAaiaa d6gacaWG0baajuaGpaqabaWdbiabgIKi7kabgkHiTiaaiodacaGGSa GaaGyna8aadaahaaqabeaajugWa8qacaaIWaaaaKqbakaac6cacaGG UaGaaGima8aadaahaaqabeaajugWa8qacaaIWaaaaaaa@49A2@ is characterized by moderate module the deviation of SKfin indicators relative to the prognostic curve with both positive and negative values.
  2. Range S K int 6 0 ..3, 5 0 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qacaWGtbGaam4saSWdamaaBaaajuaGbaqcLbmapeGaamyAaiaa d6gacaWG0baajuaGpaqabaWdbiabgIKi7kabgkHiTiaaiAdal8aada ahaaqcfayabeaajugWa8qacaaIWaaaaKqbakaac6cacaGGUaGaaG4m aiaacYcacaaI1aWdamaaCaaabeqaaKqzadWdbiaaicdaaaaaaa@4A41@ shows a more significant difference of residues, but mainly with a tendency to negative values.
  3. Range S K int 9 0 ..6 0 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qacaWGtbGaam4saSWdamaaBaaajuaGbaqcLbmapeGaamyAaiaa d6gacaWG0baajuaGpaqabaWdbiabgIKi7kabgkHiTiaaiMdal8aada ahaaqcfayabeaajugWa8qacaaIWaaaaKqbakaac6cacaGGUaGaaGOn a8aadaahaaqabeaajugWa8qacaaIWaaaaaaa@48D8@ makes the largest dispersion in both the positive and negative directions.

With the purpose of objectifying boundaries of these groups, which are differ in their correlation of SKfin и SKint we used the cluster analysis with K-means method. The obtained results are shown in Figure 3. The statistical reliability of the analysis is presented in Table 3. Taking into consideration that the cluster analysis findings are characterized by a high level of the statistical significance, we determined the boundaries of the clusters at the S K int MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qacaWGtbGaam4saSWdamaaBaaajuaGbaqcLbmapeGaamyAaiaa d6gacaWG0baajuaGpaqabaaaaa@3DCA@ , which were as follows: 1-st cluster: S K int >3, 10 0 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qacaWGtbGaam4sa8aadaWgaaqaaKqzadWdbiaadMgacaWGUbGa amiDaaqcfa4daeqaa8qacqGH+aGpcqGHsislcaaIZaGaaiilaiaaig dacaaIWaWdamaaCaaabeqaaKqzadWdbiaaicdaaaaaaa@4441@ ; 2-nd cluster: 6, 15 0 < S K int <3, 10 0 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qacqGHsislcaaI2aGaaiilaiaaigdacaaI1aWcpaWaaWbaaKqb agqabaqcLbmapeGaaGimaaaajuaGcqGH8aapcaqGGaGaam4uaiaadU eal8aadaWgaaqcfayaaKqzadWdbiaadMgacaWGUbGaamiDaaqcfa4d aeqaa8qacqGH8aapcqGHsislcaaIZaGaaiilaiaaigdacaaIWaWdam aaCaaabeqaaKqzadWdbiaaicdaaaaaaa@4DA4@ ;3-d cluster: S K int < 6, 15 0 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qacaWGtbGaam4sa8aadaWgaaqcfasaa8qacaWGPbGaamOBaiaa dshaaKqba+aabeaapeGaeyipaWJaeyOeI0IaaeiiaiaaiAdacaGGSa GaaGymaiaaiwdapaWaaWbaaeqajuaibaWdbiaaicdaaaaaaa@42E8@ . Consequently, the obtained data allows considering the intraoperative range SK 6 0 .. 3 0 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qacaWGtbGaam4saiabgIKi7kabgkHiTiaaiAdal8aadaahaaqc fayabeaajugWa8qacaaIWaaaaKqbakaac6cacaGGUaGaeyOeI0IaaG 4ma8aadaahaaqabeaajugWa8qacaaIWaaaaaaa@4431@ as the optimal for saving the indicators of correction in the late postoperative period (Figure 4). Subsequently, the biomechanical verification of the results was executed. It was analyzed 3 finite- element models of the cervical spine. The SK of spine segment with fusion system were corresponded to the centers of the obtained clusters and arranged -1,80; -4,60 and -7,80. Models marked as “ SK1, 8 0 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qacaWHtbGaaC4saiabgkHiTiaahgdacaGGSaGaaCioa8aadaah aaqabeaajugWa8qacaWHWaaaaaaa@3D94@ “, SK4, 6 0 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qacaWHtbGaaC4saiabgkHiTiaahsdacaGGSaGaaCOna8aadaah aaqabeaajugWa8qacaWHWaaaaaaa@3D95@  and SK7, 8 0 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qacaWHtbGaaC4saiabgkHiTiaahEdacaGGSaGaaCioaSWdamaa CaaajuaGbeqaaKqzadWdbiaahcdaaaaaaa@3E33@ “.The maximum values of equivalent von Mises stresses were estimated in the following model elements: the upper laminar plate of C6 vertebra body, the lower laminar plate of C4 vertebra body; arcs roots and articular masses of C4 and C6 vertebrae, screws fixing the anterior plate that are located in the bodies of C4 and C6 vertebrae. The peak values of the equivalent stresses were registered in the analyzed model elements and are shown in Figure 5.

The load distribution analysis in the contact zone of the vertebral plates with the implanted body-replacing system reveals the following regularitie

Compression action on the operated cervical spine causes the maximum loading of the lower locking plate of the C4 vertebral body during the formation of SK7, 8 0 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qacaWHtbGaaC4saiabgkHiTiaahEdacaGGSaGaaCioaSWdamaa CaaajuaGbeqaaKqzadWdbiaahcdaaaaaaa@3E33@ . Thus, the value of the equivalent tension is 8,4MPa, that is 2,3MPa more than the SK-4,60 model and 1,9MPa more than the SK1, 8 0 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qacaWHtbGaaC4saiabgkHiTiaahgdacaGGSaGaaCioa8aadaah aaqabeaajugWa8qacaWHWaaaaaaa@3D94@ . Loading of the upper laminar plate of the body C6 during compression demonstrates some other results. Consequently the values for SK4, 6 0 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qacaWHtbGaaC4saiabgkHiTiaahsdacaGGSaGaaCOna8aadaah aaqabeaajugWa8qacaWHWaaaaaaa@3D95@ and SK7, 8 0 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qacaWHtbGaaC4saiabgkHiTiaahEdacaGGSaGaaCioaSWdamaa CaaajuaGbeqaaKqzadWdbiaahcdaaaaaaa@3E33@ models are almost identical and arrange respectively 7,2MPa and 7,.3MPa, while the minimum values of segmental kyphosis provide tension of 6,3MPa. The extension load provokes the following redistribution of von Mises equivalent tension on the analyzed models. The lower laminar plate of C4 vertebra shows the highest values with SK equal to -7,80, that is manifested by the peak value of the tension of 8,6MPa. The minimum tension is fixed with SK1, 8 0 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qacaWHtbGaaC4saiabgkHiTiaahgdacaGGSaGaaCioa8aadaah aaqabeaajugWa8qacaWHWaaaaaaa@3D94@ and it is arranged 7,5MPa. In the model SK4, 6 0 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qacaWHtbGaaC4saiabgkHiTiaahsdacaGGSaGaaCOna8aadaah aaqabeaajugWa8qacaWHWaaaaaaa@3D95@ the corresponding value is registered at the level of 7,7MPa. The maximum value of the stress on the upper surface of the body C6 was recorded at SK4, 6 0 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qacaWHtbGaaC4saiabgkHiTiaahsdacaGGSaGaaCOna8aadaah aaqabeaajugWa8qacaWHWaaaaaaa@3D95@ and is 7,5MPa, while for the models SK1, 8 0 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qacaWHtbGaaC4saiabgkHiTiaahgdacaGGSaGaaCioa8aadaah aaqabeaajugWa8qacaWHWaaaaaaa@3D94@ and SK7, 8 0 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qacaWHtbGaaC4saiabgkHiTiaahEdacaGGSaGaaCioaSWdamaa CaaajuaGbeqaaKqzadWdbiaahcdaaaaaaa@3E33@ this figure is less, respectively, 0,4MPa and 0,2MPa. In a series of the load tests, the flexion emulation impact demonstrates the highest von Mises stress. So, on the lower laminar plate of C4 the analyzed value was calculated for models SK1, 8 0 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qacaWHtbGaaC4saiabgkHiTiaahgdacaGGSaGaaCioa8aadaah aaqabeaajugWa8qacaWHWaaaaaaa@3D94@ , SK4, 6 0 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qacaWHtbGaaC4saiabgkHiTiaahsdacaGGSaGaaCOna8aadaah aaqabeaajugWa8qacaWHWaaaaaaa@3D95@ and SK7, 8 0 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qacaWHtbGaaC4saiabgkHiTiaahEdacaGGSaGaaCioaSWdamaa CaaajuaGbeqaaKqzadWdbiaahcdaaaaaaa@3E33@ respectively 9,7MPa, 8,1MPa and 11,2MPa. A similar pattern was observed in the analysis of stress on the upper surface of the body C6. The minimum value is registered when loading SK4, 6 0 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qacaWHtbGaaC4saiabgkHiTiaahsdacaGGSaGaaCOna8aadaah aaqabeaajugWa8qacaWHWaaaaaaa@3D95@ model and made 6,5MPa. The maximum was observed in SK-7, 8 0 -8,9 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qacaWHtbGaaC4saiaah2cacaWH3aGaaCilaiaahIdapaWaaWba aeqabaqcLbmapeGaaCimaaaajuaGpaGaaCylaiaahIdacaWHSaGaaC yoaaaa@40F3@ MPa, while the value of 7,9MPa was observed with SK1, 8 0 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qacaWHtbGaaC4saiabgkHiTiaahgdacaGGSaGaaCioa8aadaah aaqabeaajugWa8qacaWHWaaaaaaa@3D94@ . The modelling of the rotational load demonstrates the expected low values of the equivalent stress of the anterior support complex in the area of the operated vertebral segment. So, on the lower surface of the body of C4 models SK1, 8 0 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qacaWHtbGaaC4saiabgkHiTiaahgdacaGGSaGaaCioa8aadaah aaqabeaajugWa8qacaWHWaaaaaaa@3D94@ , SK4, 6 0 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qacaWHtbGaaC4saiabgkHiTiaahsdacaGGSaGaaCOna8aadaah aaqabeaajugWa8qacaWHWaaaaaaa@3D95@ and SK7, 8 0 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qacaWHtbGaaC4saiabgkHiTiaahEdacaGGSaGaaCioaSWdamaa CaaajuaGbeqaaKqzadWdbiaahcdaaaaaaa@3E33@ peak values arranged, respectively, 3,5MPa, 3,3MPa and 4,1MPa. A similar pattern is recorded in the analysis of the equivalent stress in the contact zone of the implanted system and the upper surface of the body C6. The maximum value of 3,4MPa is marked at SK7, 8 0 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qacaWHtbGaaC4saiabgkHiTiaahEdacaGGSaGaaCioaSWdamaa CaaajuaGbeqaaKqzadWdbiaahcdaaaaaaa@3E33@ , the minimum one is registered at SK4, 6 0 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qacaWHtbGaaC4saiabgkHiTiaahsdacaGGSaGaaCOna8aadaah aaqabeaajugWa8qacaWHWaaaaaaa@3D95@  and is 2,6MPa.

The tension distribution on the C4 and C6 vertebrae arcs roots with the different loading options of the analyzed models is the followin

The C4 vertebra is the least loaded in a case of compression effect with the SK7, 8 0 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qacaWHtbGaaC4saiabgkHiTiaahEdacaGGSaGaaCioaSWdamaa CaaajuaGbeqaaKqzadWdbiaahcdaaaaaaa@3E33@ , the equivalent tension is 5,9MPa. The highest load value of the analyzed zone was noted in the model and amounted to 6,8MPa. In contrast, the roots of C6 vertebral arc of all analyzed models demonstrate significantly higher values of the analyzed parameter. Thus, the maximum amount is observed in the model SK7, 8 0 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qacaWHtbGaaC4saiabgkHiTiaahEdacaGGSaGaaCioaSWdamaa CaaajuaGbeqaaKqzadWdbiaahcdaaaaaaa@3E33@ and arranged 18,2MPa, the lowest value of 16,9MPa was in the kyphosis formation -1,80. The extension loading causes peak values at the roots of arcs in all analyzed models. For the C4 vertebra the equivalent stress was 9,2MPa, 10,0MPa and 12,4MPa for models SK1, 8 0 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qacaWGtbGaam4saiabgkHiTiaaigdacaGGSaGaaGioaSWdamaa CaaajuaGbeqaaKqzadWdbiaaicdaaaaaaa@3E28@ , SK4, 6 0 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qacaWHtbGaaC4saiabgkHiTiaahsdacaGGSaGaaCOna8aadaah aaqabeaajugWa8qacaWHWaaaaaaa@3D95@ and SK7, 8 0 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qacaWHtbGaaC4saiabgkHiTiaahEdacaGGSaGaaCioaSWdamaa CaaajuaGbeqaaKqzadWdbiaahcdaaaaaaa@3E33@ respectively. The C6 vertebra is loaded more significantly. Thus, for the model SK7, 8 0 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qacaWHtbGaaC4saiabgkHiTiaahEdacaGGSaGaaCioaSWdamaa CaaajuaGbeqaaKqzadWdbiaahcdaaaaaaa@3E33@ the value of the arc root von Mises equivalent tension was 25,3MPa, which is the maximum of all values obtained in the experiment. Model SK1, 8 0 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qacaWGtbGaam4saiabgkHiTiaaigdacaGGSaGaaGioaSWdamaa CaaajuaGbeqaaKqzadWdbiaaicdaaaaaaa@3E28@ demonstrates lower data – 22,4MPa. The most biomechanically favorable is the formation of sagittal kyphosis -4,60, which provides the load of the analyzed zone no more than 20,2MPa.The flexion of the cervical spine almost completely unloads the elements of the rear support complex. At the same time, for C4 vertebrae, the equivalent stress on the roots of arcs of all analyzed models is practically the same and is 0,8MPa, 0,9MPa and 1,1MPa, respectively, SK1, 8 0 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qacaWGtbGaam4saiabgkHiTiaaigdacaGGSaGaaGioaSWdamaa CaaajuaGbeqaaKqzadWdbiaaicdaaaaaaa@3E28@ , SK4, 6 0 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qacaWHtbGaaC4saiabgkHiTiaahsdacaGGSaGaaCOna8aadaah aaqabeaajugWa8qacaWHWaaaaaaa@3D95@ and SK7, 8 0 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qacaWHtbGaaC4saiabgkHiTiaahEdacaGGSaGaaCioaSWdamaa CaaajuaGbeqaaKqzadWdbiaahcdaaaaaaa@3E33@ . Almost identical pattern was observed in the analysis of the C6 arc root: 0,9MPa, 1,1MPa and 1,2MPa. The changes of the SK operated segment practically does not affect the arc root load of the C4 vertebra under the rotational action. Thus, the values of the equivalent tension were 5,8MPa, 6,0MPa and 6,2MPa for models SK1, 8 0 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qacaWGtbGaam4saiabgkHiTiaaigdacaGGSaGaaGioaSWdamaa CaaajuaGbeqaaKqzadWdbiaaicdaaaaaaa@3E28@ , SK4, 6 0 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qacaWHtbGaaC4saiabgkHiTiaahsdacaGGSaGaaCOna8aadaah aaqabeaajugWa8qacaWHWaaaaaaa@3D95@ и SK7, 8 0 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qacaWHtbGaaC4saiabgkHiTiaahEdacaGGSaGaaCioaSWdamaa CaaajuaGbeqaaKqzadWdbiaahcdaaaaaaa@3E33@ . A lightly different pattern was observed when loading of the root of the vertebral arch, located below the resected one. Thus, the maximum tension value is calculated in the model SK1, 8 0 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qacaWGtbGaam4saiabgkHiTiaaigdacaGGSaGaaGioaSWdamaa CaaajuaGbeqaaKqzadWdbiaaicdaaaaaaa@3E28@ and was 8,2MPa, while for SK equals to -4,60 the analyzed parameter is 6,0MPa.

The loading of the articular masses of the vertebrae which are adjacented to the resected one is similar to the nature of the load distribution on the arcs roots, but in some cases has its own characteristics

The articular masses of C4 vertebrae of the analyzed models demonstrate the highest values of equivalent stresses under compression and extension. Thus, the compressive load causes the analyzed parameter to 3,2MPa, 2,8MPa and 2,4MPa, respectively, for SK1, 8 0 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qacqGHsislcaWGtbGaam4saiabgkHiTiaaigdacaGGSaGaaGio a8aadaahaaqabeaajugWa8qacaaIWaaaaaaa@3E7C@ , SK4, 6 0 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qacaWHtbGaaC4saiabgkHiTiaahsdacaGGSaGaaCOna8aadaah aaqabeaajugWa8qacaWHWaaaaaaa@3D95@ и SK7, 8 0 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qacaWHtbGaaC4saiabgkHiTiaahEdacaGGSaGaaCioaSWdamaa CaaajuaGbeqaaKqzadWdbiaahcdaaaaaaa@3E33@ . In the modeling extension, the maximum value was noted in the SK7, 8 0 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qacaWHtbGaaC4saiabgkHiTiaahEdacaGGSaGaaCioaSWdamaa CaaajuaGbeqaaKqzadWdbiaahcdaaaaaaa@3E33@ model and was 5,5MPa, while for SK1, 8 0 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qacaWGtbGaam4saiabgkHiTiaaigdacaGGSaGaaGioaSWdamaa CaaajuaGbeqaaKqzadWdbiaaicdaaaaaaa@3E28@ , SK4, 6 0 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qacaWHtbGaaC4saiabgkHiTiaahsdacaGGSaGaaCOna8aadaah aaqabeaajugWa8qacaWHWaaaaaaa@3D95@ the values were 4,5MPa and 3,8MPa, respectively. At a flexion load, the values of the equivalent tension are corresponding to the range of 0,3-0,6MPa while the highest value is noted in the model SK1, 8 0 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qacaWGtbGaam4saiabgkHiTiaaigdacaGGSaGaaGioaSWdamaa CaaajuaGbeqaaKqzadWdbiaaicdaaaaaaa@3E28@ . Similar to the arc root C4, the change of SC practically does not affect the level of loading of the articular masses of the C4 vertebra during rotation, the equivalent stress values correspond to the range of 0,9-1,1MPa. A similar pattern was observed with analysis of C6 vertebra. Under the compression, the highest indices were registered in the model SK7, 8 0 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qacaWHtbGaaC4saiabgkHiTiaahEdacaGGSaGaaCioaSWdamaa CaaajuaGbeqaaKqzadWdbiaahcdaaaaaaa@3E33@ and amounted to 3,2MPa, the lowest 2,6MPa in SK1, 8 0 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qacaWGtbGaam4saiabgkHiTiaaigdacaGGSaGaaGioaSWdamaa CaaajuaGbeqaaKqzadWdbiaaicdaaaaaaa@3E28@ . The extensional loading demonstrates the clear advantage of SK4, 6 0 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qacaWGtbGaam4saiabgkHiTiaaisdacaGGSaGaaGOnaSWdamaa CaaajuaGbeqaaKqzadWdbiaaicdaaaaaaa@3E29@ , which is manifested by the value of the analyzed indicator 3,5MPa in comparison with 6,5MPa and 6,8MPa for SK1, 8 0 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qacaWGtbGaam4saiabgkHiTiaaigdacaGGSaGaaGioaSWdamaa CaaajuaGbeqaaKqzadWdbiaaicdaaaaaaa@3E28@ and SK7, 8 0 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qacaWHtbGaaC4saiabgkHiTiaahEdacaGGSaGaaCioaSWdamaa CaaajuaGbeqaaKqzadWdbiaahcdaaaaaaa@3E33@ respectively. The cervical spine flexion naturally demonstrates the minimal stress values of the articular masses of the vertebrae, the range of values corresponds to 0,1-0,2MPa. With the rotation, the analyzed zone of model SK4, 6 0 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qacaWHtbGaaC4saiabgkHiTiaahsdacaGGSaGaaCOna8aadaah aaqabeaajugWa8qacaWHWaaaaaaa@3D95@ is less loaded –2,2MPa, while for SK1, 8 0 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qacaWGtbGaam4saiabgkHiTiaaigdacaGGSaGaaGioaSWdamaa CaaajuaGbeqaaKqzadWdbiaaicdaaaaaaa@3E28@ and SK7, 8 0 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qacaWHtbGaaC4saiabgkHiTiaahEdacaGGSaGaaCioaSWdamaa CaaajuaGbeqaaKqzadWdbiaahcdaaaaaaa@3E33@ this index is 2,9MPa and 3,2MPa, respectively.

The analysis of the equivalent tension on fixing screws allows to reveal the following features

Under compression loading, the upper pair of screws shows the highest values of equivalent stress in the model SK1, 8 0 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qacaWGtbGaam4saiabgkHiTiaaigdacaGGSaGaaGioaSWdamaa CaaajuaGbeqaaKqzadWdbiaaicdaaaaaaa@3E28@ , that was 9,2MPa. The load in S K 7 , 8 0 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qacaWHtbGaaC4saiabgkHiTiaahEdacaGGSaGaaCioaSWdamaa CaaajuaGbeqaaKqzadWdbiaahcdaaaaaaa@3E33@ is 0,1MPa less. The most biomechanically favorable for the analyzed value was S K 4 , 6 0 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qacaWHtbGaaC4saiabgkHiTiaahsdacaGGSaGaaCOna8aadaah aaqabeaajugWa8qacaWHWaaaaaaa@3D95@ , the load made 8,2MPa. A similar pattern was observed in the analysis of the lower screw pair: 3,2MPa, 2,8MPa and 2,7MPa for SK1, 8 0 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qacaWGtbGaam4saiabgkHiTiaaigdacaGGSaGaaGioaSWdamaa CaaajuaGbeqaaKqzadWdbiaaicdaaaaaaa@3E28@ , S K 4 , 6 0 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qacaWHtbGaaC4saiabgkHiTiaahsdacaGGSaGaaCOna8aadaah aaqabeaajugWa8qacaWHWaaaaaaa@3D95@ and S K 7 , 8 0 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qacaWHtbGaaC4saiabgkHiTiaahEdacaGGSaGaaCioaSWdamaa CaaajuaGbeqaaKqzadWdbiaahcdaaaaaaa@3E33@ respectively.The еxtension in all cases is accompanied with decrease of tension in the screw pairs, that is caused with the load transfer to the rear support complex. Thus, for SK1, 8 0 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qacaWGtbGaam4saiabgkHiTiaaigdacaGGSaGaaGioa8aadaah aaqabeaajugWa8qacaaIWaaaaaaa@3D8F@ and S K 4 , 6 0 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qacaWHtbGaaC4saiabgkHiTiaahsdacaGGSaGaaCOna8aadaah aaqabeaajugWa8qacaWHWaaaaaaa@3D95@ , the values of von Mises equivalent tension on the top pair of screws were decreased in comparison with the compression load by 1,5MPa and 0,4MPa and amounted to 7,7MPa and 7,8MPa, respectively. In the model S K 7 , 8 0 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qacaWHtbGaaC4saiabgkHiTiaahEdacaGGSaGaaCioaSWdamaa CaaajuaGbeqaaKqzadWdbiaahcdaaaaaaa@3E33@ no changes are observed and the tension is 9.1MPa.The lower screw pair is also characterized by the load reduction. The highest indices, however, were registered in SK1, 8 0 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qacaWGtbGaam4saiabgkHiTiaaigdacaGGSaGaaGioaSWdamaa CaaajuaGbeqaaKqzadWdbiaaicdaaaaaaa@3E28@ model and arranged up to 2.8MPa, while for S K 4 , 6 0 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qacaWHtbGaaC4saiabgkHiTiaahsdacaGGSaGaaCOna8aadaah aaqabeaajugWa8qacaWHWaaaaaaa@3D95@ and S K 7 , 8 0 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qacaWHtbGaaC4saiabgkHiTiaahEdacaGGSaGaaCioaSWdamaa CaaajuaGbeqaaKqzadWdbiaahcdaaaaaaa@3E33@ the equivalent stresses were determined as 1,1MPa and 1,5MPa, respectively. The flexion load causes a significant increase in the stress on the fixing elements of the anterior plate. Thus, the highest rates were registered when modeling -7,80 SC and amounted to 11,2MPa on the upper screw pair. For SK1, 8 0 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qacaWGtbGaam4saiabgkHiTiaaigdacaGGSaGaaGioaSWdamaa CaaajuaGbeqaaKqzadWdbiaaicdaaaaaaa@3E28@ , S K 4 , 6 0 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qacaWHtbGaaC4saiabgkHiTiaahsdacaGGSaGaaCOna8aadaah aaqabeaajugWa8qacaWHWaaaaaaa@3D95@ , these values are corresponded to 10,2MPa and 9,5MPa, respectively. The lower pair of screws in the modelling front bending remains less loaded. The values of equivalent tension for model SK1, 8 0 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qacaWGtbGaam4saiabgkHiTiaaigdacaGGSaGaaGioaSWdamaa CaaajuaGbeqaaKqzadWdbiaaicdaaaaaaa@3E28@ , S K 4 , 6 0 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qacaWHtbGaaC4saiabgkHiTiaahsdacaGGSaGaaCOna8aadaah aaqabeaajugWa8qacaWHWaaaaaaa@3D95@ and S K 7 , 8 0 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qacaWHtbGaaC4saiabgkHiTiaahEdacaGGSaGaaCioaSWdamaa CaaajuaGbeqaaKqzadWdbiaahcdaaaaaaa@3E33@ correspond to 4,5MPa, 3,2MPa and 4,8MPa.The rotation modeling for the upper screw pair shows the maximum load at kyphosis -7,80 (10,0MPa), while the lower screw pair is significantly overloaded with a minimum value of SK. So for SK1, 8 0 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qacaWGtbGaam4saiabgkHiTiaaigdacaGGSaGaaGioaSWdamaa CaaajuaGbeqaaKqzadWdbiaaicdaaaaaaa@3E28@ the equivalent stress was 7,2MPa, while for models S K 4 , 6 0 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qacaWHtbGaaC4saiabgkHiTiaahsdacaGGSaGaaCOna8aadaah aaqabeaajugWa8qacaWHWaaaaaaa@3D95@ and S K 7 , 8 0 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qacaWHtbGaaC4saiabgkHiTiaahEdacaGGSaGaaCioaSWdamaa CaaajuaGbeqaaKqzadWdbiaahcdaaaaaaa@3E33@ only 4,2MPa and 4,3MPa.

Consequently, summarizing the finite element analysis data, it is possible to identify the following patterns:

  1. biomechanically, the most favorable for all the analyzed models is the compression load, which provides a more uniform distribution of stress on the supporting elements of the model.
  2. The rotary load leads to critical values of equivalent stress on the fixing screws.
  3. The model with SK corresponding -4,60 provides the minimum critical value of the equivalent stress in the analyzed basic structural elements.
  4. The least favorable is the formation of segmental kyphosis with a value of -7.80.

Figure 1 N=57; Epidemiological distribution of the pathological fractures, traumatic fractures, and nonunion.

Figure 1 Dependence of sagittal kyphosis values of the operated segment in the delayed postoperative period on the value of intraoperative correction and prognostic SKfin=f(SKint).

Figure 3 i. The results of the cluster analysis.  ii. The values distribution for each cluster.

Figure 4The pattern of the finite-element model “SK -4,60” with the different loading options: (A) compression, (B) extension, (C)  inflexion, (D) rotation.

Figure 5 The maximum values of equivalent von Mises stress in the models’ elements.

 

     A

    B

    C

A

1,000000

0,974551

0,819138

B

0,974551

1,000000

0,913061

C

0,819138

0,913061

1,000000

Table 1 The correlation matrix of the calculated coefficients of the model

 

Аverage value

Standard
error

t (df = 148)

p

Confidence interval (alpha=0.05)

low

top

a

0,182626

0,008965

20,37046

0,00

0,164909

0,200342

b

1,857933

0,090267

20,58268

0,00

1,679555

2,036311

c

2,921429

0,195262

14,96161

0,00

2,535568

3,307289

Table 2 The reliability estimation of the calculated coefficients of the model

 

Sum of squares of the deviations between the cluster centers

df

Sum of squares of the deviations of objects from cluster center

df

F

Importance, p

SKint

838,5718

2

101,9286

148

608,8019

<0,000001

SKfin

140,4024

2

80,4737

148

129,1077

<0,000001

Table 3 Results of the dispersive estimation based on cluster analysis

Discussion

Since the first successful anterior decompression-fusion cervical surgery and up to the present time, the technical aspects of performing surgical correction remain very discounted. The corporotomy with subsequent stabilization at subaxial level despite the relatively high risks in some cases remains the only effective method of decompression spinal cord in traumatic injuries and neoplastic and inflammatory processes in vertebral bodies, degenerative changes of the cervical spine, which are provoking the compression of the ventral spinal cord and it is accompanied by the myelopathy. For a quite long period, the use of tricortical auto graft was the gold standard of the spinal surgery. Further researches, however, showed a fairly high rate of adverse results, that were manifested by lysis of the implanted bone fragment, its fracture, migration, loss of achieved intraoperative correction and, in some cases, aggravation of neurological disorders. The combination of auto graft with a anterior plate partially solved these problems. The next significant milestone in the development of spine surgery is the use as the body replacing system as hollow vertical cylindrical mesh implants. The first clinical experience with the use of mesh-systems without additional fixing wasn’t met with significant success because of the extremely high frequency of prolapse of the system in the body of the vertebrae adjacent to the resected ones. The combination of mesh and rigid ventral plate has demonstrated rather high clinical efficiency.

The literature data allows to reveal a significant number of works devoted to the evaluation of the effectiveness of this combination. The authors consider both biomechanical, clinical and radiological aspects. At the same time, the results are extremely variable. A number of researchers demonstrate 100% efficiency and safety of the stabilization method, others - indicate the frequency of unsatisfactory results up to 30%.

Such results dissociation appears to be due to a number of factors

Firstly, until now, there have not been developed sufficiently clear criteria that would allow to evaluate the effectiveness of the surgical intervention. It is known that clinical symptoms often do not correspond to the x-ray picture. Thus, progressive kyphotic deformation in the postoperative period may not be accompanied by neurological disorders for a long time. At the same time, the effective fusion with preservation of the sagittal contour and optimized distribution of the load on the cervical spine in case of severe trauma may not lead to an obvious regression of neurological disorders. Considering the SK state of the operated segment as a criterion of efficiency of the fusion, which is emphasized in this research, it should be mentioned that the different authors’ interpretation of the results is very ambiguous. Thus, K. Narotam and co-authors, based on a 4-year retrospective study, estimate the correction loss up to 40 as an excellent and 50-90 as a good one.12 At the same time, a number of authors allow the increase of kyphotic deformation up to 100 in comparison with intraoperative parameters.13 In other publications can be found a quite reasonable statements about such loss of correction in traumatic lesions of the cervical spine, it is quite significant local CSF flow and vascular disorders, in addition to the violation of the congruence of the facet joints in combination with the defeat of the ligamentous apparatus of the rear support complex can lead to one- or bilateral dislocation, causing enough risk of the vascular lesions compression of neural structures at the level of the operated segment. Secondly, the vast majority of publications devoted to the combined use of mesh and ventral plate evaluate the result of the performed surgery, but not the result of the treatment of a certain pathology. For example, some clinical studies include the patients with traumatic spinal cord injury and patients with compression myelopathy due to degenerative changes of the spine. This approach, obviously, does not allow to carry out the comparative biomechanical analysis of the produced fusion in full objectively. It is known that decompressive-fusion surgery performed in patients with isolated traumatic injury of the anterior support cervical spine complex biomechanically has no equivalent to similar surgical manipulation performed in the treatment of cervical myelopathy.

For example, the absence of traumatic injury of ligamentous apparatus of the posterior supporting complex verified with MRA or CT doesn’t give a total assurance of the absence of this pathology and it does not exclude, however, the distension of the ligamentous-capsular apparatus of the concerned spine segment. Results of search in the National Center for Biotechnology Information database using keywords “cervical mesh cage” for the period of last 5 years shows that the vast majority of publications is devoted to the application of the analysed combination in treatment of cervical myelopathy. As for the traumatic injuries treatment, the majority of authors prefer the 3600-fixation. Along with this, however, there is some tendency to minimize surgical exposure. Thus, a number of works convincingly demonstrate the effectiveness of isolated anterior fusion even with significant damage to the front and rear support structures of the subaxial section of the cervical spine. This data is fully correlated with our research results. The retrospective analysis demonstrates rather convincingly high clinical efficiency of the described method of surgical treatment under condition of technical adequacy of execution with the subsequent clinically and biomechanically reasoned stages of rehabilitation. This approach, undoubtedly, can reduce both the economic loading and the surgical trauma, reducing the postoperative complications risk and negative iatrogenic effects.

Thirdly, the most important factor is the lack of a unified approach to the surgical operation technique. In fact, considering the use of mesh, there are two different approaches that have an impact on the final results.12 A number of surgeons, during the system installation, prefer to use the partial resection of the endplates of the vertebral bodies, which significantly increases the coherence with the implantable structure. However, due to the cortical layer removal, this approach requires the use of endcaps, in order to increase the bearing surface of the implant and prevent the system prolapse into the vertebral body. Another approach is to maximize the preservation of the cortical layer of the endplates, that eliminates the use of additional structural elements. In our research we applied this surgical modification that for a number of reasons was considered as more expedient. Thus, the structure teeth impression in the cortical layer of the endplate and a kind of adaptation in the implant-bone system. It creates additional stabilization and prevents dislocation of the structure. The use of endplates inevitably reduces the contact area of the filler of mesh with bone tissue and in some way prevents the bone block formation. Thus, the mesh-system, which is actually a cage for a filler and is designed to consolidate with the bodies of the vertebrae, is that case loses its main advantage and turns into simple spacer. Taking into consideration the fact of true fusion formation, i.e. bone fusion, is the most optimal and most stable outcome of surgery, and the use of end caps is impractical. Besides, a certain role in forming the biomechanical pattern of anterior fusion plays the type of screws for cervical plate fixation. Our retrospective data consists of cases with fixed screws, so the model has the appropriate type of fusion system. Using non-fixed or variable type screws obviously impacts the stability of fixation and can be studied further. Presented data demonstrates the reasons of wide range the final results of the similar surgical interventions, that are given in the literature. The obtained in our study data is partly consistent with some of them. At the same time, it should be mentioned that the concept of the maximum possible preservation of the physiological curvature of the cervical spine formed the basis of this research. It which is unconditionally proved, even when the deviation from the desired SK values do not have visible negative clinical consequences within the analysed observation period.

Conclusion

The data analysis clearly demonstrates the connection between the values of SK achieved during the operation and the values in delayed postoperative period. The intraoperative correction with SK formation in the range of -6,150..-3,100 is optimal for preserving the physiological curvature of the operated segment in the long-term postoperative period. The obtained data have both clinical and experimental- biomechanical confirmation.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of interests

Authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kwon BK, Vaccaro AR, Grauer JN, et al. Subaxial cervical spine trauma. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2006;14(2):78–89.
  2. Palomar AP, Calvo B, Doblaré M. An accurate finite element model of the cervical spine under quasi-static loading. J Biomech. 2008;41(3):523–531.
  3. Narotam PK, Pauley SM, McGinn GJ. Titanium mesh cages for cervical spine stabilization after corpectomy: a clinical and radiological study. J Neurosurg. 2003;99(2 Suppl):172–180.
  4. Boakye M, Patil CG, Ho C, et al. Cervical corpectomy: complications and outcomes. Neurosurgery. 2008;63(4 Suppl 2):295–301.
  5. Kanayama M, Hashimoto T, Shigenobu K, et al. Pitfalls of anterior cervical fusion using titanium mesh and local autograft. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2003;16(6):513–518.
  6. Oner C, Rajasekaran S, Chapman JR, et al. Spine Trauma-What Are the Current Controversies? J Orthop Trauma. 2017;31 Suppl 4:S1–S6.
  7. Fischer CR, Cassilly R, Cantor W, et al. A systematic review of comparative studies on bone graft alternatives for common spine fusion procedures. Eur Spine J. 2013;22(6):1423–1435.
  8. Liu Y, Li N, Wei W, et al. Prognostic Value of Lordosis Decrease in Radiographic Adjacent Segment Pathology After Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):14414.
  9. Andaluz N, Zuccarello M, Kuntz C. Long-term follow-up of cervical radiographic sagittal spinal alignment after 1- and 2-level cervical corpectomy for the treatment of spondylosis of the subaxial cervical spine causing radiculomyelopathy or myelopathy: a retrospective study. J Neurosurg Spine. 2012;16(1):2–7.
  10. Harrison DE, Harrison DD, Cailliet R, et al. Cobb method or Harrison posterior tangent method: which to choose for lateral cervical radiographic analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25(16):2072–2078.
  11. Sewell MD, Rothera L, Stokes O, et al. Assessing the amount of distraction needed for expandable anterior column cages in the cervical spine. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2017;99(8):659–660.
  12. Narotam PK, Pauley SM, McGinn GJ. Titanium mesh cages for cervical spine stabilization after corpectomy: a clinical and radiological study. J Neurosurg. 2003;99(2 Suppl):172–180.
  13. Silber JS, Lipetz JS, Hayes VM, et al. Measurement variability in the assessment of sagittal alignment of the cervical spine: a comparison of the gore and cobb methods. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2004;17(4):301–305.
©2018 Slynko et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.
© 2014-2018 MedCrave Group, All rights reserved. No part of this content may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means as per the standard guidelines of fair use.
Creative Commons License Open Access by MedCrave Group is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at https://medcraveonline.com
Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version | Opera |Privacy Policy