Submit manuscript...
Journal of
eISSN: 2373-6410

Neurology & Stroke

Case Report Volume 7 Issue 5

Pain Threshold in Migraine and Tension-Type Headache by Pressure Algometry in Craniocervical Muscles and Peripheral Nerves in Both Genders

Silvya Nery Bernardino,1 Fernando Henrique M Souza,2 Raimundo Pereira Silva-Néto,1 Hugo André de Lima Martins,1 Luiz Ataíde Júnior,1 Roberto Sérgio Martins,3 Isabel Nery Bernardino de Souza,4 Regina Nery Bernardino de Souza4

1Neuropsychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Federal University of Pernambuco, Brazil
2Department of Neurosurgery of Hospital of the Restauration, Recife, Brazil
3Department of Neurosurgery, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
4Graduating Medical Student University of Pernambuco, Brazil

Correspondence: Silvya Nery Bernardino, Rua Gal. Joaquim Ignácio, 83, salas: 135/136 - Ilha do Leite, 57-27, Recife, Brazil, Tel +55 81 3223-4891; +55 81 8677-6949

Received: August 27, 2017 | Published: October 11, 2017

Citation: Bernardino SN, Souza FHM, Silva-Néto RP, Martins HAL, Júnior LA et al. (2017) Pain Threshold in Migraine and Tension-Type Headache by Pressure Algometry in Craniocervical Muscles and Peripheral Nerves in Both Genders. J Neurol Stroke 7(5): 00252. DOI: 10.15406/jnsk.2017.07.00252

Download PDF

Abstract

Objectives: Our objective was to determine the pain threshold in migraine and tension-type headache patients by pressure algometry in craniocervical muscles and peripheral nerves in both genders.

Methods: Migraine or tension-type headache patients, diagnosed according to criteria of International Classification of Headache Disorders-2, were evaluated by pressure algometry in skin adjacent to four craniocervical muscles (temporal, masseter, sternocleidomastoid, and trapezius) and seven peripheral nerves (greater occipital, supra-orbital, infra-orbital, mentonian, median, ulnar, and radial) bilaterally. We studied 25 migraine patients (38.4%), 20 tension-type headache patients (30.8%), and 20 patients (30.8%) were controls. Of the 65 patients, 41 (63%) were female and 24 (37%) male. The age ranged from 20 to 50 years.

Results: The pain threshold was significantly lower in both migraine and tension-type headache patients compared with the control group (p < 0.001) in craniocervical muscles and peripheral nerves in both genders. However, there were no significant statistical differences between migraine and tension-type headache patients, as well as between men and women.

Conclusion: Migraine and tension-type headache patients have lower pressure pain threshold at all stimulated points in craniocervical muscles and peripheral nerves in both genders.

Keywords: Measurement of pain; Pain threshold; Pressure algometry; Primary headaches; Migraine; Tension-type headache

Introduction

Among the painful syndromes, headache is one of the more frequent complaints in daily clinical practice, especially in migraine and tension-type headache patients [1,2]. The consequences are both direct (health expenses) and indirect (work absence) [3].

In the last years, the phenomenon of the central sensitization has been considered an important component in the pathogenesis of migraine. This mechanism proposes that the changes in the neurophysiology lead to an increase in the sensitivity to normal stimuli [4]. However, there is a consequent difficulty to assess the degree of patient distress due to headache is a subjective symptom [5].

There is a technique to measure the physiology of the nociceptive system, known as pressure algometry. It has a direct action on the responsive peripheral nociceptors to the pressure stimuli, making possible the study of the nociceptive integrity in normal individuals or with different pain syndromes [6]. Our aim was to determine the pain threshold in migraine and tension-type headache patients by pressure algometry in craniocervical muscles as in nerves peripheral in both genders.

Patients and Methods

Study design and Patients

This was a prospective study with comparison of groups. The study population comprised a non-random and convenience sampling, consisting of the first 20 control patients, 25 migraine patients and 20 tension-type headache (TTH) patients (comparison group).

Inclusion criteria

Patients aged between 20 and 50 years, no complaint of headache (control), with migraine or tensional-type headache, according to the diagnostic criteria of International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD)-2 [7] and absence of abortive medication for at least 5 days were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria                                                                                                            

Patients with psychiatric disorders, skin diseases (psoriasis, herpes zoster and leprosy that interfere with the perception of pain), patients with any type of secondary headache, abnormal neurological or neuroimaging examination, congenital insensitivity to pain, fibromyalgia, surgical procedure skull, face or cervical spine, and those who used stimulants or have pain in the last 24 hours.

Data collection

Patients who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were invited to participate by signing the consent form. Patients in group with headache and the control group were subjected to the evaluation of thresholds of pain perception in selected areas of the body. In all three groups, a single examiner assessed the pain threshold by pressure algometry in selected areas of the body. A skin surface of 0.5 cm diameter adjacent to four craniocervical muscles (temporal, masseter, sternocleidomastoid and trapezius) and seven peripheral nerves (greater occipital, supra-orbital, infra-orbital, mentonian, median, ulnar and radial) was stimulated bilaterally. Participants rested for 10 minutes before obtaining the stimulus.

The Wagner digital algometer with a liquid crystal display five digit, measuring 0.5 inches and with certified calibration was used perpendicularly to the skin. Participants were instructed to inform the first unpleasant sensation of pain. Immediately after the perception of pain, the painful stimulus was discontinued and the values were recorded in kgf/cm2.

Statistical analysis

All collected data were organized in database. The quantitative variables were expressed as mean and standard deviation. The Kruskal-Wallis and chi-square tests for differences between averages and categorical variables were used respectively, assuming a significance level of 0.05. Dunn’s test carried for pared comparison. The tests were carried out with an error of 5.0%. The typing of data was done in the Excel and the statistical program used for the obtainment of statistical calculations was the BioEstat, version 5.0 for Windows.

Ethical aspects

This study was approved by Ethics in Research Involving Human Subjects Committee at the Federal University of Pernambuco, Brazil. All patients signed the Informed Consent Form.

Results

There were 65 patients averaging 39.0±7.2 in age (95% CI 37.5-40.5) and ranging from 20 to 50 years old, of which 41 (63.0%) were women. Twenty-five patients (38.4%) were diagnosed with migraine, 20 patients (30.8%) with TTH, and 20 patients (30.8%) were controls, whose distribution differed according to sex and age, as observed in Table 1. Migraine and tension-type headache were predominant in women. These differences were significant. The pain threshold was significantly lower in both migraine and TTH patients compared with the control group (p< 0.001). However, there were no significant statistical differences between the migraine and the TTH patients (Tables 2 & 3).

Variables

Groups

p Value

Control (n=20)

Migraine (n=25)

TTH (n=20)

Gender

0.857

Female (n; %)

10 (50.0)

18 (72.0)

13 (65.0)

Male (n; %)

10 (50.0)

7 (28.0)

7 (35.0)

Age (years)

< 0.001

Mean (sd)

38.5 (5.7)

38.5 (5.6)

39.2 (4.4)

Variation

29-49

20-48

23-50

Table 1: Clinical features of 65 patients without complaints of headache (control), with migraine or tension-type headache.
SD: Standard Deviation; TTH: Tension-Type Headache

Stimulated Points

Groups

p Value

Control

Migraine

TTH

Muscles

Temporal

Right

2.47 ± 0.40

1.57 ± 0.56

1.72 ± 0.37

< 0.001

Left

2.52 ± 0.40

1.54 ± 0.53

1.68 ± 0.32

< 0.001

Masseter

Right

2.50 ± 0.24

1.64 ± 0.59

1.85 ± 0.30

< 0.001

Left

2.51 ± 0.30

1.52 ± 0.54

1.77 ± 0.33

< 0.001

Sternocleidomastoid

Right

2.17 ± 0.18

1.32 ± 0.50

1.66 ± 0.41

< 0.001

Left

2.27 ± 0.27

1.43 ± 0.49

1.68 ± 0.46

< 0.001

Trapezius

Right

2.36 ± 0.25

1.82 ± 0.55

1.93 ± 0.25

0.003

Left

2.39 ± 0.29

1.77 ± 0.62

1.94 ± 0.24

0.007

Nerves

Greater Occipital

Right

2.88 ± 0.62

1.76 ± 0.49

1.85 ± 0.23

< 0.001

Left

2.87 ± 0.74

1.78 ± 0.53

1.86 ± 0.34

< 0.001

Supra-orbital

Right

2.55 ± 0.41

1.80 ± 0.47

1.71 ± 0.36

< 0.001

Left

2.50 ± 0.36

1.84 ± 0.50

1.75 ± 0.30

0.001

Infra-Orbital

Right

2.11 ± 0.31

1.39 ± 0.54

1.58 ± 0.39

0.001

Left

2.14 ± 0.31

1.45 ± 0.49

1.56 ± 0.32

0.002

Mentonian

Right

2.29 ± 0.31

1.57 ± 0.46

1.57 ± 0.34

< 0.001

Left

2.37 ± 0.28

1.58 ± 0.51

1.58 ± 0.37

< 0.001

Median

Right

3.17 ± 0.37

2.18 ± 0.81

2.25 ± 0.34

0.001

Left

3.23 ± 0.40

2.14 ± 0.85

2.27 ± 0.28

< 0.001

Ulnar

Right

3.43 ± 0.37

2.11 ± 0.78

2.29 ± 0.28

< 0.001

Left

3.44 ± 0.43

2.13 ± 0.83

2.28 ± 0.29

< 0.001

Radial

Right

3.48 ± 0.35

2.09 ± 0.71

2.22 ± 0.27

< 0.001

Left

3.44 ± 0.32

2.04 ± 0.76

2.24 ± 0.26

< 0.001

Table 2: Distribution of measures of pain threshold in 41 women without complaints of headache (control), with migraine or tension-type headache.
Note: p value based on the Kruskal-Wallis test. Legend: TTH: Tension-Type Headache.

Stimulated Points

Groups

p Value

Control

Migraine

TTH

Muscles

Temporal

Right

3.21 ± 0.48

2.17 ± 0.48

1.82 ± 0.54

< 0.001

Left

3.27 ± 0.53

2.12 ± 0.54

1.80 ± 0.56

< 0.001

Masseter muscle

Right

3.19 ± 0.42

2.39 ± 0.52

1.94 ± 0.53

< 0.001

Left

2.72 ± 0.39

2.21 ± 0.38

1.87 ± 0.46

< 0.001

Sternocleidomastoid

Right

3.02 ± 0.55

1.86 ± 0.55

1.49 ± 0.54

< 0.001

Left

3.02 ± 0.61

1.83 ± 0.48

1.46 ± 0.51

< 0.001

Trapezius

Right

4.23 ± 1.57

2.59 ± 0.42

2.14 ± 0.78

< 0.001

Left

4.32 ± 1.45

2.69 ± 0.51

2.18 ± 0.82

< 0.001

Nerves

Greater Occipital

Right

3.49 ± 0.63

2.45 ± 0.43

2.20 ± 0.45

0.001

Left

3.56 ± 0.67

2.36 ± 0.43

2.15 ± 0.44

0.001

Supra-Orbital

Right

3.27 ± 0.46

2.18 ± 0.36

1.90 ± 0.32

< 0.001

Left

3.15 ± 0.45

2.17 ± 0.39

1.89 ± 0.27

< 0.001

Infra-Orbital

Right

2.63 ± 0.23

2.05 ± 0.25

1.76 ± 0.30

< 0.001

Left

2.49 ± 0.32

1.95 ± 0.20

1.71 ± 0.30

< 0.001

Mentonian

Right

2.71 ± 0.37

2.07 ± 0.33

1.75 ± 0.32

< 0.001

Left

2.72 ± 0.39

2.04 ± 0.32

1.75 ± 0.30

< 0.001

Median

Right

4.41 ± 0.45

3.12 ± 0.63

2.75 ± 0.50

< 0.001

Left

4.51 ± 0.67

3.23 ± 0.62

2.67 ± 0.60

< 0.001

Ulnar

Right

4.44 ± 0.62

3.28 ± 0.53

2.76 ± 0.64

< 0.001

Left

4,36 ± 0,51

3,14 ± 0.49

2,70 ± 0.59

< 0.001

Radial

Right

4,43 ± 0,63

3,09 ± 0,32

2,67 ± 0.44

< 0.001

Left

4.43 ± 0.89

3.09 ± 0.33

2.75 ± 0.49

< 0.001

Table 3:Distribution of measures of pain threshold in 24 men without complaints of headache (control), with migraine or tension-type headache.
Note: p value based on the Kruskal-Wallis test. TTH: Tension-Type Headache

It was also observed that the absolute values obtained at the tested points were lower in women than in men, however, this data is not statistically significant. The absolute values of pain thresholds were lower in patients with longer duration of headache (over 10 years) compared with the shorter time (less than 3 years).

Discussion

In migraine and TTH patients, central sensitization is expressed clinically by a phenomenon called cutaneous allodynia [8], which perception of pain generated by painless stimulus. These sensations have been described in several pain syndromes [9] and occur when performing daily activities such as combing hair or wearing tight clothing.

It is believed that nociceptors are sensitized after repeated attacks of headache. Neuropeptides such as substance P and peptide calcitonin gene-related (CGRP) are released during acute migraine and produce perivascular neurogenic inflammation. CGRP is a glutamatergic neuromodulator of trigeminal ganglion synapses in the central nervous system (CNS) that transmits sensory information. Thus, CGRP may act by sensitizing synapses in the CNS [10].

This modulation can be performed in two ways: presynaptic and postsynaptic. The presynaptic role is supported by increased levels of CGRP, and cAMP release of substance P from cultured trigeminal ganglion neurons [11]. On the other hand a function could involve postsynaptic signals cAMP or calcium CGRP receptor and may activate glutamate receptors [12,13]. Therefore, receptor antagonists CGRP could be a possible therapy for other pain disorders [14]. This inflammatory state probably sensitizes cranial nociceptors and subsequently decreases its activation threshold expanding their receptors [15]. Second-other and third-order neurons become activated and exposure to repeated episodes of pain eventually results in decreased pain threshold [16] reaching up to 79% of patients with cutaneous allodynia[17].

In our study women are the most affected by migraine, agreeing with the literature[18,19] and a high percentage of women (40 to 50%) have migraine attacks before, during or just after menstruation, which points to an association of migraine with female hormonal levels [20]. Conversely, hormonal contraceptives may cause no change or even improve pain [21-23].

Our results revealed lower painful thresholds in TTH patients, whose have genetically predisposed individuals [24] or an exaggerated sensitivity to neuronal various stimuli, with facilitation of pain [25]. However, there was no significant difference between the group of patients with migraine and the other with tension-type headache, agreement other studies [26-29].

We have not observed any difference in painful thresholds of patients with a higher frequency of pain. Our findings are in agreement with a study that evaluated women with episodic and chronic migraine [30]. In our study, the painful thresholds in migraine and TTH patients were lower than the control group at all points stimulated, similar to other studies with primary headaches, as seen in Table 4.

References

Control (n; %)

Pain Syndromes

Stimulated Points (n)

Lower Pain Threshold (%)

Sand et al. [26]

40

25

TTH, Migraine or Cervicogenic Headache

13

100

Fernández-de-las-Peñas et al. [28]

25

40

TTH

9

100

Fernández-de-las-Peñas et al. [29]

40

50

Unilateral Migraine

10

100

Grossi et al. [30]

44

34.1

Episodic or Chronic Migraine

8

100

Table 4: Lower pain thresholds in patients with painful headache compared with controls, according to some authors.
TTH: Tension-Type Headache.

In our study, the pain thresholds in the extremities of the upper limbs, in the territory of the median, ulnar and radial nerves are lower in migraine and TTH patients than in the control group, supporting the idea that the repetition of pulses on C-fiber sensory amplifies the signals [31]. Development of pulsatility in the initial phase of migraine is mediated by sensitization of peripheral neurons of the trigeminal vascular system and allodynia cutaneous later during acute migraine is propelled by sensitization central neurons [32]. We have found the lowest pain thresholds in patients with longer duration of headache (over 10 years), probably by constant inflammatory state that sensitizes cranial nociceptors, leading to decreased activation of its receptors. To our knowledge, this was the first research pain threshold by pressure algometry in migraine and tension type headache in craniocervical muscles and peripheral nerves in both genders.

Conclusion

Migraine and tension-type headache patients have lower pressure pain threshold at all stimulated points in craniocervical muscles and peripheral nerves in both genders.

Conflict of Interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Funding

This research received no specific grants from any funding agency in the public commercial or non-profit sector.

References

  1. Millan MK (1999) The induction of pain: an integrated review. Prog Neurobiol 57(1): 1-164.
  2. Lipton RB, Buse DC, Saiers J, Fanning KM, Serrano D,                          et al. (2013) Frequency and burden of headache-related nausea: results from the American Migraine Prevalence and Prevention (AMPP) study. Headache 53(1): 93-103.
  3. Linde M, Gustavsson A, Stovner LJ, Steiner TJ, Barré J, et al. (2012) The cost of headache disorders in Europe: the Eurolight project. Eur J Neurol 19(5): 703-711.
  4. Ashkenazi A, Young WB (2004) Dynamic Mechanical (Brush) Allodynia in cluster headache. Headache 44(10): 1010-1012.
  5. Broggi G (2008) Pain and psycho-affective disorders. Neurosurgery 62(6 Suppl 3): 901-919
  6. Piovesan EC, Tatsui CE, Kowacs PA, Lange MC, Pacheco C, et al. (2001) Using algometry of pressure measuring the threshold of trigeminal pain perception in normal volunteers: a new protocol of studies. Arq neuropsiquiatr 59(1): 92-96.
  7. (2004) The International Classification of Headache Disorders: 2nd edition. Cephalalgia 24(Suppl 1): 9-160.
  8. Bigal ME, Ashina S, Burstein R, Reed ML, Buse D, et al. (2008) Prevalence and characteristics of allodynia in headache sufferers. A population study. Neurology 70(17): 1525-1533.
  9. Ashkenazi A (2010) Allodynia in cluster headache. Current Pain Headache Rep 14 (2): 140-144.
  10. Russo AF, Kuburas A, Kaiser EA, Raddant AC, Recober A (2009) A Potential Preclinical Migraine Model: CGRP-Sensitized Mice. Mol Cell Pharmacol 1(5): 264-270.
  11. Zhang Z, Winborn CS, Marquez de Prado B, Russo AF (2007) Sensitization of calcitonin gene-related peptide receptors by receptor activity-modifying protein-1 in the trigeminal ganglion. J Neurosci 27(10): 2693-2703.
  12. Li J, Vause CV, Durham PL (2008) Calcitonin gene-related peptide stimulation of nitric oxide synthesis and release from trigeminal ganglion glial cells. Brain Res 1196: 22-32.
  13. Capuano A, De Corato A, Lisi L, Tringali G, Navarra P, et al. (2009) Proinflammatory-activated trigeminal satellite cells promote neuronal 26 sensitization: relevance for migraine pathology. Mol Pain 5: 43
  14. Marquez De Prado B, Hammond DL, Russo AF (2009) Genetic enhancement of calcitonin gene-related Peptide-induced central sensitization to mechanical stimuli in mice. J Pain 10(9): 992-1000.
  15. Burstein R, Yamamura H, Malick A, Strassman AM (1998) Chemical stimulation of the intracranial dura induces enhanced responses to facial stimulation in brain stem trigeminal neurons. J Neurophysiol 79(2): 964-982.
  16. Yamamura H, Malick A, Chamberlin NL, Burstein R (1999) Cardiovascular and neuronal responses to head stimulation reflect central sensitization and cutaneous allodynia in a rat model of migraine. J Neurophysiol 81(2): 479-493.
  17. Burstein R, Yarnitsky D, Goor-Aryeh I, Ransil BJ, Bajwa ZH (2000) An association between migraine and cutaneous allodynia. Ann Neurol 47(5): 614-624.
  18. Henry P, Auray JP, Gaudin AF, Dartigues JF, Duru G, et al. (2002) Prevalence and clinical characteristics of migraine in France. Neurology 59(2): 232-237.
  19. Rasmussen BK (1995) Epidemiology of migraine. Biomed Pharmacother 49(10): 452-455.
  20. Liverman CS, Brown JW, Sandhir R, Mccarson KE, Berman NE (2009) Role of the estrogen receptors GPR30 and ERalpha in peripheral sensitization: relevance to trigeminal pain disorders in women. Cephalalgia 29(7): 729-741.
  21. Becker WJ (1999) Use of oral contraceptives in patients with migraine. Neurology 53(4 Suppl 1): 19-25.
  22. Chu ML, Shinnar S (1992) Headache in children younger than 7 years of age. Arch Neurol 49(1): 79-82.
  23. Nappi RE, Terreno E, Sances G, Martini E, Tonani S, et al. (2013) Effect of a contraceptive pill containing estradiol valerate and dienogest (E2V/DNG) in women with menstrually-related migraine (MRM). Contraception 88(3): 369-375.
  24. Benoliel R, Eliav E (2013) Primary headache disorders. Dent Clin North Am 57(3): 513-539
  25. Coppola G, Di Lorenzo C, Schoenen J, Pierelli F (2013) Habituation and sensitization in primary headaches. J Headache Pain 14(1): 65.
  26. Sand T, Zwart JA, Helde G, Bovim G (1997) The reproducibility of cephalic pain pressure thresholds in control subjects and headache patients. Cephalalgia 17(7): 748-755.
  27. Kitaj MB, Klink M (2005) Pain thresholds in daily transformed migraine versus episodic migraine headache patients. Headache 45(8): 992-998.
  28. Fernández-de-las-Peñas C, Ge HY, Cuadrado ML, Madeleine P, Pareja JA, et al. (2008) Bilateral pressure pain sensitivity mapping of the temporalis muscle in chronic tension-type headache. Headache 48(7): 1067-1075.
  29. Fernández-de-las-Peñas C, Madeleine P, Cuadrado ML, Ge HY, Arendt-Nielsen L, et al. (2009) Pressure pain sensitivity mapping of the temporalis muscle revealed bilateral pressure hyperalgesia in patients with strictly unilateral migraine. Cephalalgia 29(6): 670-676.
  30. Grossi DB, Chaves TC, Gonçalves MC, Moreira VC, Canonica AC, et al. (2011) Pressure pain threshold in the craniocervical muscles of women with episodic and chronic migraine: a controlled study. Arq neuropsiquiatr 69(4): 607-612.
  31. Zhuo M (2007) Neuronal mechanism for neuropathic pain. Molecular Pain 3: 14
  32. Burstein R, Jakubowski M, Garcia-Nicas E, Kainz V, Bajwa Z, et al. (2010) Thalamic sensitization transforms localized pain into widespread allodynia. Ann Neurol 68(1): 81-91.
Creative Commons Attribution License

©2017 Bernardino, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.