Submit manuscript...
Journal of
eISSN: 2373-6410

Neurology & Stroke

Research Article Volume 14 Issue 6

Demographics, characteristics, and clinical profile of motor neuron disease in oman

Abdullah M Al Salti,1 Ahmed SM Nadeem,1 Sanjith Arun,1,2 Khalil I AJ Al Shaikhly,1 Farzad Fatehi1,3,4

1Department of Neurology, Khoula Hospital-MOH, Oman
2Departments of Internal Medicine and Neurology, Christian Medical College Hospital, Vellore, India
3Neuromuscular Research Center, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iran
4University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, UK

Correspondence: Ahmed SM Nadeem, Department of Neurology, Khoula Hospital-MOH, Oman

Received: December 05, 2024 | Published: December 20, 2024

Citation: Salti AMA, Nadeem AS, Arun S, et al. Demographics, characteristics, and clinical profile of motor neuron disease in oman. J Neurol Stroke. 2024;14(6):191-196. DOI: 10.15406/jnsk.2024.14.00607

Download PDF

Abstract

Background: Motor neuron disease (MND) presents a considerable health challenge globally and is characterized by progressive neurodegeneration leading to debilitating weakness and eventual respiratory failure. Despite its impact, studies on MND from the Middle East and North Africa region are scarce. Considering the seriousness of the disease, it is important to recognize the demographics, clinical spectrum, and heterogeneity of MND cases to enable early diagnosis and the prompt initiation of supportive interventions to improve survival, quality of life, and physical functioning as there are presently no therapies to arrest or reverse this fatal disease.

Objective: This study aimed to elucidate the demographics, clinical characteristics, management strategies, and outcomes of MND in Omani patients admitted and/or referred to a single tertiary care hospital in Muscat, Oman.

Methods: A total of 29 patients diagnosed with MND who were treated and followed up at the neuromuscular disorders clinic, Khoula Hospital, Muscat, Oman, between January 2016 and April 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Data collection and analysis included patient demographics, site of onset, duration of symptoms, clinical features, and the results of diagnostic workup. The initial primary diagnosis, clinical course follow-up, and treatments and supportive interventions were also reviewed. Furthermore, outcome measures and survival were recorded.

Results: The patients had a male-to-female ratio of 1.23:1, a mean age of symptom onset of 54.7±7 years, and a mean duration of the disease from its onset to diagnosis of 20.3±20.9 months. Most patients (69%) presented with significant limb muscle weakness at diagnosis, with an overall revised amyotrophic lateral sclerosis functional rating scale of 35.14±10.49. MND was considered initially in 21% of the cases, while the most common primary diagnoses were cervical and lumbosacral radiculopathy (in 34% of the cases). The classic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis of spinal onset (cervical and lumbar) was the most common clinical phenotype (in 41.4% of the studied patients). The mean duration of follow-up was 48 months, and by the end of the study, 27.6% of the patients with MND were on mechanical ventilation (invasive and noninvasive), 34.5% had parenteral tube feeding, and 86% were on treatment with riluzole. Survival analysis revealed gender-related differences, with females exhibiting shorter survival times than males (26 vs. 42 months).

Conclusion: As a novel, comprehensive report on the Omani MND population, this study revealed that the epidemiological and clinical characteristics of the disease in Oman were similar to those observed in international populations. However, our study indicated a higher survival rate because of the early initiation of supportive interventions. In addition, this study showed that Omani women had a longer duration of diagnostic delay and a shorter median survival time than men. We suggest a longer-term (5–10 year follow-up) multicenter study involving local and regional centers to include a larger number of patients with MND for obtaining a better understanding of the disease in this region.

Keywords: motor neuron disease; amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, clinical phenotypes, oman

Introduction

Motor neuron disease (MND) is a neurodegenerative disease characterized by the progressive loss of upper motor neurons (UMNs) and lower motor neurons (LMNs) throughout the central nervous system, leading to progressive weakness of the bulbar, limb, thoracic, and abdominal muscles.1 This condition can be sporadic (in 90%–95% of cases) or hereditary2 and encompasses a group of heterogeneous clinical presentations of rapidly progressive and universally fatal disorders with variability in disease progression and survival.3 Therefore, the diagnosis and classification/categorization of MND are based on a defined set of diagnostic criteria (the revised El Escorial and the Awaji criteria).4–6

The varied clinical presentations of MND include the following: (i) Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), also known as Lou Gehrig disease, is the comment phenotype. It starts with limb weakness (spinal onset) and progressive neurological deterioration with the coexistence of UMN and LMN signs. (ii) Progressive muscular atrophy (PMA), representing approximately 10% of MND cases, is a clinically pure LMN phenotype. (iii) Primary lateral sclerosis (PLS), constituting 1%–5% of MND cases, is a clinically pure UMN phenotype. (iv) Isolated progressive bulbar palsy (PBP), present in 1%–2% of MND cases, causes an isolated bulbar phenotype with relative preservation of spinal motor neurons.3,7

PMA, the clinically atypical MND phenotype, includes the flail-limb variants characterized by neurogenic weakness confined to the proximal upper limbs (flail-arm) for at least 24 months or confined to the lower limbs (flail-leg) for at least 12 months.8,9 One-third of PMA cases may develop UMN dysfunction.9 PLS (with pure UMN involvement) and PMA (with pure LMN involvement) are rare, and certain patients initially classified into these subtypes can evolve into ALS.10 More recently, an association has been established between ALS and frontotemporal degeneration.11 Despite the clinical heterogeneity, the median survival of patients with MND remains approximately 3 years, although the atypical phenotypes exhibit a favorable longer survival.12

Being a relatively rare disease with varied presentations and progression, patients with MND are often diagnosed late after manifesting their initial symptoms, with a reported median time to diagnosis of approximately 14 months.13 Although a combination of UMN and LMN signs and symptoms in a patient should raise the clinical suspicion of MND, other conditions can also present with both UMN and LMN signs and symptoms, making many cases of MND misdiagnosed. In contrast, some potentially treatable conditions may be diagnosed as MND. A population-based study has reported an overall 10% error in the diagnosis of ALS.14

Once the diagnosis is confirmed, MND is invariably a fatal condition, and the main cause of death is respiratory failure. However, early diagnosis has been shown to play a pertinent role in extending the life expectancy of patients.15

In addition, the use of noninvasive ventilation (NIV) in patients with severe respiratory muscle involvement, placement of a feeding gastrostomy tube, and treatment with riluzole can prolong survival.6,16 The overall global incidence of ALS has been estimated to be between 0.6 and 3.8 per 100,000 person-years, with wide variations among geographical regions.17–20 A probable explanation for this observation is a combination of genetic, environmental, and lifestyle factors.18,20

There is a paucity of literature from the Middle East and North Africa region on MND. A consanguineous family from Saudi Arabia with juvenile ALS in an autosomal recessive pattern has been reported, and the responsible gene has been identified.21 In a retrospective study from six neurology departments in Iran, a crude prevalence of 1.57/100,000 for ALS has been identified.22 Furthermore, an average incidence of 0.89/100,000 and a prevalence of 3.47/100,000 have been documented in Libya,23 with a median survival time of 42 months. A study from Tunisia has described a case series of 60 patients with ALS with an average age of 52.1±11.2 years.24 There is a lack of literature on this rare but serious and fatal disease from the Sultanate of Oman. This single-center study discusses the clinical characteristics and follow-up of a cohort of ethnic Omani patients with MND.

Subjects and methods

This research was a retrospective, descriptive, single-center study involving patients diagnosed with MND based on the El Escorial and Awaji-Shima criteria.4,6 during March 2016–April 2020 at the neuromuscular disorders clinic in a tertiary center at Khoula Hospital, Muscat, Oman. The inclusion criteria were a diagnosis of MND by a neurologist after eliminating other similar diseases and meeting the revised El Escorial and Awaji-Shima criteria for definite MND in adult patients. Those with other forms of anterior horn cell disease and motor axonal neuron disease who did not fulfill the revised El Escorial and Awaji-Shima diagnostic criteria, those with other MND mimickers, and those with an alternative diagnosis were excluded.

Demographic characteristics and relevant clinical data, such as the onset of symptoms, time of first visit to the neuromuscular clinic, time of establishing the diagnosis, clinical symptoms at diagnosis, and the initial diagnosis, were reviewed and analyzed. All patients were classified according to established clinical phenotypes: ALS classic (spinal onset-cervical and lumbar), ALS bulbar onset, isolated PBP, PLS, and flail-limb (flail-arm and/or flail-leg) PMA based on the observed patterns of disease presentation and progression. The clinical and electrophysiological principles used in the El Escorial/Awaji criteria.4,6,25 were adapted to facilitate patient classification.

The frequency of brain and spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies was recorded. The disease severity was assessed in all cases using the Revised ALS Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS-R). The outcome measures were determined, which included the following: the time of onset of respiratory failure, the time of starting non-mechanical or mechanical ventilation, and the time of parenteral tube insertion. Follow-up for survival (defined from symptom onset) was conducted at different intervals of clinical visit, and the date of death was also recorded.

Statistical analysis

For descriptive statistics, frequencies of the clinical characteristics were calculated in all participants. Continuous variables were reported as medians, means, and standard deviations (SD). Categorical variables were reported as percentages. All analyses were performed using the Statistical Product and Service Solutions software (SPSS), version 29 by IBM. The starting point for the mean and median survival time was the date of disease onset. The ending point was either the date of death or the first of April 2020 for those who were alive at the study termination.

Results

This study included 29 patients with MND, of which 16 were men and 13 were women, and the male-to-female ratio was 1.23:1. The overall mean age at symptom onset was 54.7±12.7 years, and the oldest patient was an 81-year-old male at the time of symptom onset. The disease duration, from onset to diagnosis, varied among the participants, with a mean period of 20±20.9 months. Most patients presented with significant weakness at diagnosis, with an overall ALSFRS-R of 35.14±10.49. Spinal and brain MRIs were performed (79% and 69%, respectively) to rule out MND mimics. Women had a delay in diagnosis from disease onset (27.5±26.26 months), were more symptomatic than men, and their ALSFRS-R was 30.8±10.31. However, there was no statistically significant difference in the data between men and women (P > 0.05) (Table 1).

Group

Men

Women

ALL

P-value

Participant, N (%)

16 (55.2)

13 (44.8)

29

 

Age1 years±SD

52.06±9.71

56.77±15.63

54.17±12.7

0.299

Duration of disease from onset 1 ±SD, month

14.4

27.5

20±20.9

0.375

Delay in diagnosis from first visit1±SD, month

1.6

1.5

1.62 ±1.21 months

0.146

ALS-FRS1 at diagnosis

± SD

38.6

30.8

35.14±10.49

0.105

Spine MRI

12

11

23(79 %)

0.525

Brain MRI

10

10

20 (69 %)

0.404

Length of follow-up 1

28

19

24 months

0.600

1 mean value

Table 1 Demographic and clinical characteristics

Limb weakness was the most common clinical symptom at presentation (82.7%), and bulbar symptoms, such as dysphagia and dysarthria, were present in 62.1% of the patients. Pain was observed in 17.2% at the time of diagnosis, whereas muscle cramps and/or stiffness were present in 13.8% (Table 2). No family history of MND was recorded in any of the patients.

Clinical symptoms

%

Limb weakness

82.7

Dysarthria and/or dysphagia

62.1

Impaired balance

20.7

Muscle wasting

20.7

Pain

17.2

Muscle cramps and/or stiffness

13.8

Depression and anxiety

10.3

Fasciculation

10.3

Weight loss

6.9

Shortness of breath

6.9

Sleep disturbance

6.9

Table 2 Clinical presenting symptoms

The ALS clinical phenotype (combined bulbar and spinal onsets) was the most common, accounting for 65.6% of the cohort cases. Within the ALS group phenotype, classic ALS was the most frequent phenotype, found in 13 patients (44.8%), whereas the ALS-bulbar onset was seen in 6 patients (20.7%). Isolated PBP and flail-limb PMA subgroups were noted in 4 patients each, representing 13.8%, and only 2 patients belonged to the PLS subgroup (6.9%) (Figure 1).

Figure 1 Clinical phenotypes of the patients.

Spinal radiculomyelopathy was the most common primary or provisional diagnosis (in 41.3%), brainstem stroke accounted for 20%, and multifocal motor neuropathy with conduction block constituted 14% of the patients. MND was the initial diagnosis in only 6/29 (21%) of the patients (Table 3). Analysis of treatments administered showed that 86% of the patients were on riluzole, 13.8% on edaravone (Radicava), and 10.3% underwent stem cell transplant. By the end of the study, 27.6% of the patients with MND were on mechanical ventilation (invasive and noninvasive) and 34.5% received parenteral tube feeding (Table 4).

Initial diagnosis and treatment

Clinical

presentation

Number of patients

 

Cervical radiculopathy

 

Upper limb weakness

7 (24%)

Lumbosacral radiculopathy

Foot drop/lower limb weakness

3 (10%)

Noncompressive myelopathy

 

Weakness in both lower limbs

2 (7%)

Local ENT causes

Bulbar muscle weakness

2 (7%)

Multifocal motor neuropathy with conduction block

 

Weakness in the upper limbs

2 (7%)

 

 

Ischemic stroke

Dysarthria and dysphagia

2 (7%)

CIDP chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy

Weakness in both upper and lower limbs

1(3%)

 

Brachial plexopathy

 

Unilateral upper limb weakness

1 (3%)

Rotator cuff injury

Unilateral upper limb weakness

1 (3%)

Neuromuscular junction transmission deficit

Respiratory muscle weakness

1 (3%)

 

Myopathy

Bilateral lower limb weakness

1 (3%)

 

Note: In 6/29 (21%) cases, MND was considered in the initial differential diagnosis.

 

Table 3 Initial or primary diagnosis of patients with MND

 

Men

Women

Total, N (%)

Participant, # N

16

13

29

Riluzole

15

10

25 (86)

Edaravone (Radicava)

3

1

4 (13.8)

Stem cell transplant

3

0

3 (10.3)

Mechanical ventilation

3

5

8 (27.6)

Parenteral feeding

4

6

10 (34.5)

Table 4 Drug treatment and supportive measures

By the end of the study, 23 participants (79.3%) survived and 6 (20.7%) died. The median survival time from onset was 4.3 years (51 months) (Table 5). Women had a shorter median survival time than men; However, Kaplan–Meier survival curves revealed no significant survival rate difference (p = 0.61) (Figure 2).

Group

Men

Women

Total

Number of subjects

16

13

29

Median survival time in months

90

42

51

No. of survival

14

9

23

No. of deaths by the end of the study

2

4

6

Table 5 Survival outcome

Figure 2 Kaplan–Meier survival curves in men and women.

Discussion

Most of the currently known clinical characteristics of MND come from studies in Europe and North America. However, recently it has been reported that the epidemiologic characteristics and clinical manifestations of this disease vary depending on the ethnicity of different populations.20,26,27 Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the characteristics, clinical phenotypes, management strategies, and outcomes of MND in Oman.

Family history of the disease was not observed among the participants, and approximately 90%–95% of ALS/MND has been reported to be sporadic.28 The male-to-female ratio was 1.23, which is close to the ratio of 1.3–1.56 reported in other studies.28–32

In our patients, the age range at disease onset was 24–81 years, with a mean of 54.17±12.7 years, which was lower in men than in women (52.06±9.71 years and 56.77±15 years, respectively). A wide range has been reported for the mean age of patients with MND (46–64 years) as well as for the mean age at onset (58–63 years) for sporadic ALS.33 A similar finding of a lower age at onset in men than in women has been reported.34

Our study found that 69.0% of the patients had limb weakness (spinal onset) as a symptom of onset, whereas 41.4% presented with bulbar symptoms (bulbar onset). Other studies have reported similar findings,14,35 and some investigations have observed a lower incidence of bulbar symptoms.31,36 Bulbar symptoms were more common in women than in men (66.3% and 31.3%, respectively) in our study, which is aligned with other reports.31,35

Pain was a neglected symptom of ALS until a decade ago.36 Several studies have focused on pain in ALS and have documented immense variabilities in its frequency among patients, ranging from <15% to up to 85%.37–41 The pain frequency noted in our study was 17.2%, and it was more common in women (30.8%) than in men (6.3%). The mean duration from onset to diagnosis in this study was 20±20.9 months, and it was longer in women than in men (27.5±26.26 months and 14.4±11.26 months, respectively). Slightly shorter mean durations have been reported in previous studies.34,42

ALS has been shown to account for approximately 70% of all cases of MND, the classic limb-onset ALS subtype constitutes approximately two-thirds of all cases of ALS, and the remaining one-third is the bulbar-onset subtype.43,44 Our study noted comparable findings. Approximately 7% of our patients had the PLS type, which has been shown to be responsible for up to 5% of all cases of MND.3,7 In contrast, PMA constitutes approximately 10% of the cases.43,45 This study obtained a slightly higher percentage of PMA in its flail-limb variant (13.8%), which could be attributed to the small cohort included. However, UMN signs can develop late during PMA; in such a case, the diagnosis might be changed to classic ALS.46 This change may also account for the variable percentages reported, as several patients may start with one phenotype and progress to the complete clinical picture of classic ALS. Similarly, a higher rate of the isolated PBP type was observed in our patients (13.8%), whereas the figures reported in the literature range from 1% to 2%.3,7 This observation could be attributed to the modest sample size of this study.

Knowledge of the common MND masquerades may aid in the early diagnosis of the disease and in avoiding unnecessary therapies; therefore, the initial diagnosis of our patients was also analyzed as all of them initially attended secondary care hospitals. In 23/29 (79%), a diagnosis other than MND was made, and only in 6/21 (21%), MND was considered as the initial diagnosis.

Cervical radiculopathy was the most common condition considered instead of MND (25%), and one of the patients also underwent surgery. Several patients with MND can have concomitant cervical spondylosis and be often treated as cervical spondylotic radiculopathy, thus delaying the diagnosis. Similar findings have been reported by other studies.47,48 Approximately 10% of our patients experienced isolated unilateral lower limb weakness presenting as foot drop and were diagnosed as lumbar radiculopathy or plexopathy. Similar cases have been documented earlier, leading to the delayed diagnosis of MND.49 Furthermore, two of our patients were initially considered to have multifocal motor neuropathy with conduction block and were treated for this condition. This slowly progressive pure motor disease can mimic the upper limb-onset MND. A weakness out of proportion to the wasting with the absence of bulbar involvement may aid in differentiating it from MND.50

Rarely, strokes can also mimic MND. The loss of voluntary control of facial and masticatory muscles can occur in the rare Foix–Chavany–Marie syndrome or in bilateral anterior opercular syndrome. This condition has been mistakenly considered a cause for bulbar weakness in a patient with bulbar-onset MND.51 Two of our patients with MND having bulbar-onset symptoms received an initial diagnosis of local structural pathology. Hence, it is important to note that in MND, the initial symptoms of dysarthria always precede dysphagia. One of our patients with MND presented with respiratory muscle weakness and was initially considered to have myasthenia gravis (MG) and treated for this condition. In patients with bulbar weakness, differentiating between MND and MG is very difficult. Acetylcholine receptor antibodies can be negative in patients with MG, and muscle fatigue that responds to pyridostigmine can occur in both conditions.52 Moreover, pyridostigmine can cause fasciculations, especially if administered in high doses.53 One of our patients, who presented with bilateral lower limb weakness, was initially diagnosed as having inflammatory muscle disease. Patients with MND can have elevated creatine phosphokinase levels, and case reports of polymyositis mimicking MND have been published.54

Another interesting finding in our study is that bulbar-onset MND was observed in 5 out of 6 cases (83%) in which MND was considered in the initial differentials. The significant early symptoms and rapidity of progression might have aided in considering MND initially in these cases. Three medical treatments have been shown to prolong survival: NIV, gastrostomy feeding, and riluzole.16,55 The frequency of mechanical ventilation (noninvasive and invasive) among patients in our study was 27.6%, gastrostomy feeding was 34.5%, and riluzole was used in 86% of the cases. Our finding agrees with a longitudinal study of ALS by Demetriou et al. in 2019, which reported that 18% of the patients were on mechanical ventilation, 34% underwent gastrostomy placement (percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) feeding), and 84% received riluzole.56 Another study has reported that 23.5% of the patients with MND underwent PEG, 10.4% received NIV, and 6.3% had tracheostomy.35 Riluzole has been reported to be taken regularly throughout the course of the disease by 51.6%–60.9% of the patients.35,57

The median survival time from symptom onset was 4.3 years in our study, which is longer than that reported in other studies. Testa et al. documented 2.9 years,34 while a population-based study conducted in Italy observed a median survival of 2.5 years.32 In addition, our 4-year survival rate (79.3 %) is higher than that reported by Testa et al. (2004).

The median survival rate in our study was shorter in women than in men, but the difference was not statistically significant in survival rate. A similar finding has been reported by Testa et al.34 The ALS-FRS-R at diagnosis can predict prognosis and survival.58 The mean ALS-FRS-R at diagnosis in our study was 35.14±10.49, which is close to that reported in other studies.58,59

This study is the first in Oman to investigate the clinical characteristics, clinical phenotypes, management strategies, and outcomes of MND. The prevalence and incidence of MND could not be calculated as ours was a hospital-based study. Nonetheless, the findings could be utilized as baseline data for an improved understanding of the characteristics of MND in our country and, consequently, for better management of the disease. Our study is limited by its small sample size as MND is a rare disease in which the patient’s survival is short and the diagnosis is delayed. Therefore, a multicenter study involving local and regional centers and longer follow-up (5–10 years) is recommended in the future to increase the sample size and enhance our understanding of the incidence, prevalence, clinical characteristics, and outcomes of MND in this geographic region.

Conclusion

This study is a novel, comprehensive report on Omani patients with MND, which has broadened our understanding of the clinical characteristics of this fatal neurodegenerative disease. This study revealed that the epidemiological and clinical characteristics of patients with MND in Oman are similar to those observed in the international populations but demonstrated a higher survival rate, which can be explained by the early use of supportive interventions. Women faced a longer duration of diagnostic delay and had a shorter median survival time than men. Local and regional multicenter studies are required to augment our comprehension of the incidence and clinical characteristics of MND.

Acknowledgments

None.

Conflicts of interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Ethical approval

The study approval was granted by the Research Ethics Committee, Khoula Hospital-MOH (Code PRO012021073).

References

  1. Goutman SA. Diagnosis and clinical management of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and other motor neuron disorders. Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2017;23(5):1332–1359.
  2. Jawdat O, Statland JM, Barohn RJ, et al. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis regional variants (brachial amyotrophic diplegia, leg amyotrophic diplegia, and isolated bulbar amyotrophic lateral sclerosis). Neurol Clin. 2015;33(4):775–785. 
  3. Kiernan MC, Vucic S, Cheah BC, et al. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Lancet. 2011;377:942–955.
  4. Brooks BR. El Escorial World Federation of neurology criteria for the diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. subcommittee on motor neuron disease/amyotrophic lateral sclerosis of the world federation of neurology research group on neuromuscular diseases and the el escorial clinical limits of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis’ workshop contributors. J Neurol Sci. 1994;124 (Suppl):96–107.
  5. Ludolph A, Drory V, Hardiman O, et al. A revision of the El Escorial criteria - 2015. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener. 2015;16(5-6):291–292.
  6. De Carvalho M, Dengler R, Eisen A, et al. The Awaji criteria for diagnosis of ALS. Muscle Nerve. 2011;44(3):456–457.
  7. Hardiman O, van den Berg LH, Kiernan MC. Clinical diagnosis and management of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Nat Rev Neurol. 2011;7(11):639–649.
  8. Vucic S, Kiernan MC. Abnormalities in cortical and peripheral excitability in flail arm variant amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2007;78(8):849–852.
  9. Wijesekera LC, Mathers S, Talman P, et al. Natural history and clinical features of the flail arm and flail leg ALS variants. 2009;72(12):1087–1094.
  10. Gordon PH, Cheng B, Katz IB, et al. The natural history of primary lateral sclerosis. 2006;66(5)647–653. 
  11. Lomen-Hoerth C, Anderson T, Miller B. The overlap of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and frontotemporal dementia. 2002;59(7):1077–1079.
  12. Visser J, van den Berg-Vos RM, Franssen H, et al. Disease course and prognostic factors of progressive muscular atrophy. Arch Neurol. 2007;64(4):522–528.
  13. Andersen PM, Borasio GD, Dengler R, et al. Good practice in the management of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: clinical guidelines. An evidence-based review with good practice points. EALSC Working Group. Amyotroph Lateral Scler. 2007;8:195–213.
  14. Traynor BJ, Codd MB, Corr B, et al. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis mimic syndromes: A population-based study. Arch Neurol. 2000;57(1):109–113. 
  15. Rooney J, Byrne S, Heverin M, Tobin K, Dick A, Donaghy C, et al. A multidisciplinary clinic approach improves survival in ALS: a comparative study of ALS in Ireland and Northern Ireland. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2015;86(5):496–501. 
  16. Wolf J, Safer A, Wöhrle JC, et al. Factors predicting one-year mortality in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients -data from a population-based registry. BMC Neurol. 2014;14:197. 
  17. Pupillo E, Messina P, Logroscino G, et al. Long-term survival in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a population-based study. Ann Neurol. 2014;75(2):287–297. 
  18. Marin B, Boumediene F, Logroscino G, et al. Variation in worldwide incidence of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a meta-analysis. Int J Epidemiol. 2017;46:57–74. 
  19. Chio A, Logroscino G, Traynor BJ, et al. Global epidemiology of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a systematic review of the published literature. Neuroepidemiology. 2013;41:118–130. 
  20. Xu L, Liu T, Liu L, et al. Global variation in prevalence and incidence of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurol. 2020;267(4):944–953.
  21. Al‐Saif A, Al‐Mohanna F, Bohlega S. A mutation in sigma‐1 receptor causes juvenile amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Ann Neurol. 2011;70(6):913–919. 
  22. Sajjadi M, Etemadifar M, Nemati A, et al. Epidemiology of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in Isfahan, Iran. Eur J Neurol. 2010;17(7):984–989. 
  23. Radhakrishnan K, Ashok PP, Sridharan R, et al. Descriptive epidemiology of motor neuron disease in benghazi, libya. 1986;5(1):47–54. 
  24. Imounan F, Lahbouje S, Hsaini Y, et al. Clinical and environmental aspects of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in moroccan population: a study of 60 cases. Tunis Med. 2015;93(6):365–370.
  25. World Federation of Neurology Research Group on Neuromuscular Diseases Subcommittee on Motor Neuron Disease. Airlie House Guidelines. Therapeutic trials in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Airlie House ‘Therapeutic trials in ALS’ Workshop Contributors. J Neurol Sci. 1995;129 Suppl:1–10.
  26. Marin B, Logroscino G, Boumédiene F, et al. Clinical and demographic factors and outcome of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in relation to population ancestral origin. Eur J Epidemiol. 2016;31(3):229–245.
  27. Cronin S, Hardiman O, Traynor BJ. Ethnic variation in the incidence of ALS: a systematic review. Neurology. 2007;68(13):1002–1007.
  28. Talbott EO, Malek AM, Lacomis D. The epidemiology of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Handb Clin Neurol. 2016;138:225–238.
  29. Hirtz D, Thurman DJ, Gwinn-Hardy K, et al. How common are the "common" neurologic disorders? 2007;68(5):326–337.
  30. Mehta P, Kaye W, Raymond J, et al. Prevalence of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis - united states, 2014. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018;67(7):216–218.
  31. Ingre C, Roos PM, Piehl F, et al. Risk factors for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.Clin Epidemiol. 2015;7:181–193.
  32. Manjaly ZR, Scott KM, Abhinav K, et al. The sex ratio in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a population based study. Amyotroph Lateral Scler. 2010;11(5):439–442.
  33. Jokelainen M. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in Finland. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica. 1977;56:194–204.
  34. Testa D, Lovati R, Ferrarini M, et al. Survival of 793 patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis diagnosed over a 28-year period. Amyotroph Lateral Sclerosis Other Motor Neuron Disord. 2004;5(4):208–212.
  35. Chiò A, Mora G, Leone M, et al. Piemonte and Valle d'Aosta Register for ALS (PARALS). Early symptom progression rate is related to ALS outcome: a prospective population-based study. 2002;59(1):99–103.
  36. Handy CR, Krudy C, Boulis N, et al. Pain in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a neglected aspect of disease. Neurology Research International. 2011;1–8. 
  37. Chiò A, Mora G, Lauria G. Pain in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. The Lancet Neurology. 2017;16(2):144–157.
  38. Wicks P. Reassessing received wisdom in ALS-pain is common when studied systematically. Eur J Neurol. 2012;19(4):531–532.
  39. Wallace VC, Ellis CM, Burman R, et al. The evaluation of pain in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a case controlled observational study. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener. 2014;15:520–27.
  40. Dalla Bella E, Lombardi R, Porretta-Serapiglia C, et al. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis causes small fiber pathology. Eur J Neurol. 2016;23(2):416–420.
  41. Hanisch F, Skudlarek A, Berndt J, et al. Characteristics of pain in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Brain Behav. 2015;5(3):e00296.
  42. Logroscino G, Traynor BJ, Hardiman O, et al. Incidence of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in Europe. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2010;81(4):385–390.
  43. Van Es MA, Hardiman O, Chio A, et al. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Lancet. 2017;390(10107):2084–2098.
  44. Hardiman O, Al-Chalabi A, Chio A, et al. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Nature Reviews Disease Primers. 2017;3(17071):17071.
  45. Swinnen B, Robberecht W. The phenotypic variability of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Nat Rev Neurol. 2014;10(11):661–670.
  46. Al Chalabi A, Hardiman O, Kiernan MC, et al. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: moving towards a new classification system. The Lancet Neurology. 2016;15(11):1182–1194.
  47. Lai X, Gu X, Yang X, et al. Motor neurone disease-associated neck pain misdiagnosed as cervical spondylosis: A case report and literature review. J Clin Neurosci. 2018;55:112–115.
  48. Kano O, Iwamoto K, Ito H, et al. Limb-onset amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients visiting orthopedist show a longer time-to-diagnosis since symptom onset. BMC Neurol. 2013;13:19.
  49. Alfaro EC, Perez YM. Drop Foot as initial symptom of pseudopolyneuritic variant motor neuron disease. A case report. Clinical Neurophysiology. 2016;127(9):316–317.
  50. Vlam L, Van der PWL, Cats EA, et al. Multifocal motor neuropathy: diagnosis, pathogenesis and treatment strategies. Nat Rev Neurol. 2013;8(1):48–58.
  51. Nowak DA, Gabriela G, Dabitzb R, et al. Bilateral anterior opercular (Foix-Chavany-Marie) syndrome. J Clin Neurosci. 2010;17(11):1441–1442.
  52. Brockington A, Shaw PJ. Developments in 17 the treatment of motor neurone disease. Adv Clin Neurosci 2003;3:13–9.
  53. Malabaey M, Al Saud AA, Alaska YA, et al. Pyridostigmine suicidal attempt in a myasthenia gravis patient. Am J Case Rep. 2019;20:1418–1421.
  54. Ryan A, Nor AM, Costigan D, et al. Polymyositis masquerading as motor neuron disease. Arch Neurol. 2003;60(7):1001–1003.
  55. Knibb JA, Keren N, Kulka A, et al. A clinical tool for predicting survival in ALS. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2016;87(12):1361–1367.
  56. Demetriou CA, Hadjivasiliou PM, Kleopa KA, et al. Retrospective longitudinal study of ALS in cyprus: clinical characteristics, management and survival. PLoS One. 2019;14(9):e0220246.
  57. Fávero FM, Voos MC, Castro I, et al. Epidemiological and clinical factors impact on the benefit of riluzole in the survival rates of patients with ALS. Arq Neuro Psiquiatr. 2017;75(8):515–522.
  58. Elamin M, Bede P, Montuschi A, et al. Predicting prognosis in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a simple algorithm. J Neurol. 2015;262(6):1447–1454.
  59. Kimura F, Fujimura C, Ishida S, et al. Progression rate of ALSFRS-R at time of diagnosis predicts survival time in ALS. Neurology. 2006;66(2):265–267.
Creative Commons Attribution License

©2024 Salti, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.