Submit manuscript...
Journal of
eISSN: 2373-6453

Human Virology & Retrovirology

Research Article Volume 5 Issue 2

Incidence of Depression and the Coping Styles used for it by Under Graduate and Post Graduate Pharmacystudents: A Comparison

Saliha Khalid,1 Annum Bukhari,1 Saira Azhar,1 Nidda Saeed,1 Sohail Manzoor,3 Humaira Syed,1 Fraz Munir Khan,3 Akash Syed,1 Syed Abbas Ali,4 Muhammad Ali,2 Muhammad Saleem Kamboh5

1Department of Pharmacy, COMSATS, Pakistan
2Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Punjab, Pakistan
3Disease Diagnostic Laboratories, L&DD, Pakistan
4Provincial Diagnostic Laboratory,L&DD, Pakistan
5Directorate General (Research), L&DD, Pakistan

Correspondence: Saliha Khalid, Department of Pharmacy, COMSATS, Abbottabad, Pakistan, Tel +923336503982

Received: January 28, 2017 | Published: March 7, 2017

Citation: Khalid S, Bukhari A, Azhar S, Saeed N, Manzoor S, et al. (2017) Incidence of Depression and the Coping Styles used for it by Under Graduate and Post Graduate Pharmacy students: A Comparison. J Hum Virol Retrovirol 5(2): 00146. DOI: 10.15406/jhvrv.2017.05.00146

Download PDF

Abstract

Depression is one of the most prevalent mental conditions worldwide affecting the general population. Students are presumably prone to this condition because of academic and personal stressors. Depressed students employ a variety of coping methods to deal with their condition. A prospective study was conducted by stratified random sampling in which questionnaire was distributed randomly to 196 undergraduate and postgraduate pharmacy students out of 401 registered students of the pharmacy department of the institution. The study estimated the incidence of depression using CES-D scale and determined different coping styles used by depressed university scholars with the help of 28-item Brief Cope inventory. Various academic and personal stressors were also identified. Overall, (118) 60% university scholars were depressed. Female students were more depressed than male students. Assignments, frequent examination and quizzes were the major stressors for the students. Religion and substance use were the most and least commonly used coping methods for depression, respectively. Measures should be taken by the institution to routinely assess the mental health status of students and health promotional programs should be initiated for improving the personal and professional life of university scholars.

KeywordsDepression, Coping styles, Stressors, Pharmacy students, Counseling, Pakistan

Introduction

Depression is prevalent worldwide and estimated to be the third most common cause of disabling conditions and expected to be the leading cause of disability by the year 2030.1 Depressive disorders were associated with the second most common cause of years lived with disability (YLDs) in 2010 and was identified to be the topmost contributing cause to disability adjusted life years (DALYs), without mortality as an underlying cause. According to findings of the study on Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2010, depression was identified as the leading cause contributing to the health burden.2-4 A systematic review reveals the prevalence of anxiety and depression in Pakistani population to be around 34% .5 Depression is one of the frequent health ailments affecting the university scholars.6 University scholars are at a higher risk of depression, and according to a systematic review of studies focused on the prevalence of depression published between 1990-2010, an estimated mean prevalence of 30.6% was identified which suggests that the incidence of depression is higher in university scholars as compared to the general population.7 It has also resulted in poor academic performance of university scholars.8 Incidence of depression may also predispose the students to different other health disorders like HIV infection, diabetes and increased risk of suicidal tendency.9-11 The common stressors identified include academic stressors, social stresses and financial problems.12 Coping Strategies refer to different continuous psychological, behavioral and emotional processes to deal with different stressors.13

While depression in certain age groups such as adolescents or the elderly has contributed to rising apprehension.14-18. In spite of the evidence suggesting that there has been a gradual increase in the number of depressed university scholars, the problem has not been served with due attention.19 Regardless of such pernicious effects of depression, there have been limited studies conducted in Higher Education Institutions of Pakistan to confront mental health problems. Stress is a part of life and not just a part of university life. If the problem of depression is not managed appropriately, it will result in various physical emotional and interpersonal problems. Therefore, it is an important skill of life to learn how to deal and manage with depression by keeping a positive approach.

Methods

Study design

A questionnaire was designed from two standard questionnaires for checking the incidence of depression and the coping styles used by students to tackle their depression. The questionnaire had four parts including basic socio-demographic information, CES-D scale, various stressors and 28-item Brief Cope Inventory.

CES-D scale: It is a short self-report depression scale to measure the depression symptoms of population. It consisted of 10 questions. The score range was 0-30. Individuals with score greater than 10 were considered to be depressed.

Stressors: Most common sources of stress for university scholars were included in the questionnaire categorized into two types; academic stressors involving frequent examinations, quizzes and assignments whereas personal stressors included class competition, lack of sleep, interpersonal relationship problems, personal or family health issues, death of a loved one and financial issues.

Brief Cope-28: It is the short version of original COPE Inventory and evaluates 14 coping styles and there were 2 questions per coping style. The answers to the questions were evaluated using a 4-point likert scale with responses varying from 1(I have not been doing this at all) to 4 (I have been doing this a lot). The scores vary from 2 to 8.

Sample size

Total sample size was selected to be 196 from the total 401 registered students of the pharmacy department of the institution in the year 2016. Samples were collected by stratified random sampling.

Data collection Procedure

Every selected student was detailed about the study objectives and oral consent was taken of each student for inclusion in the study. Questionnaires were distributed to the randomly selected registered pharmacy students of COMSATS Abbottabad and were filled by the students. Data was collected prospectively from all the respondents.

Data Analysis

Data was statistically analyzed by Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS, version 20). Descriptive statistics were performed and results were mentioned in the form of percentage and frequency. The Chi-square test was used to test the significance of association between the dependent variable of incidence of depression and various independent variables (frequent examinations, quizzes, assignments, class competition, and lack of sleep, interpersonal relationship problems, personal or family health issues, financial issues, social activities and colleagues support). The P value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Mean of each coping style was calculated to determine the frequency of their use by depressed students.

Results

Basic sociodemographic characteristics and incidence of depression

Incidence of depression and the various coping styles used for it were determined from data collected from undergraduate and postgraduate pharmacy students. Social and demographic data of all students along with total number of depressed cases in each category is mentioned in Table 1-3. As a whole, 118 (60%) students were depressed according to CES-D scale. And depression was more common in females 73(64%) as compared to males. And individuals with age less than 25 years were found to be more depressed.

No. Characteristics

n (%)

Number of Depressed Cases (%)

 Sex

Females

114(58.2)

73(64.0)

Males

82(41.8)

45(54.9)

Age

<25 Years

145(74.0)

91(62.8)

>25 Years

51(26.0)

27(52.9)

Educational Status

Pharm-D

140(71.4)

87(62.1)

MS/PhD

56(28.6)

31(55.4)

Pharmacy by own choice

Yes

139(70.9)

83(59.7)

No

57(29.1)

35(61.4)

Living Status

Day Scholar

85(43.4)

53(62.4)

Boarder

111(56.6)

65(58.6)

Regular Exercise

Yes

41(20.9)

20(48.8)

No

155(79.1)

98(63.2)

Social Activities

Yes

107(54.6)

57(53.3)

No

89(45.4)

61(68.5)

Regular Meal

Yes

138(70.4)

80(58.0)

No

58(29.6)

38(65.5)

Colleagues Support

Yes

147(75.0)

81(55.1)

No

49(25.0)

37(75.5)

Supervisor Support

Yes

122(62.2)

68(55.7)

No

74(37.8)

50(67.6)

Sleeping Hours

<8 hours

130(66.3)

85(65.4)

>8 hours

66(33.7)

33(50.0)

Current Status of Postgraduates

Course Work

20(35.7)

11(55.0)

Research Work

36(64.3)

20(55.6)

Professional Year of Pharm-D

1st Year

25(17.9)

16(64.0)

2nd Year

29(20.7)

20(69.0)

3rd Year

33(23.6)

20(69.0)

4th Year

23(16.4)

17(73.9)

5th Year

30(21.4)

14(46.7)

Table 1 Student’s socio-demographic data with percentage and frequency of depressed cases

Independent Variable

P value

Independent Variable

P value

Frequent Examinations

0.028

Financial Issues

0.025

Assignments

0.003

Social Activities

0.03

Quizzes

0.005

Colleagues Support

0.011

Class competition

0.144

Loneliness or Isolation

0.006

Lack of Sleep

0.15

Sleeping hours

0.038

Interpersonal Relationship Problem

0.101

Personal or Family Health Issues

0.019

Table 2 Correlation between dependent variable (CES-D Scale Score) and various independent variables

N (%)

COPING STYLES

I haven’t been doing this at all

I’ve been doing this a little bit

I’ve been doing this a medium amount

I’ve been doing this a lot

Means of coping style scores in depressed students

 Active Coping

5 (4.2)

20 (16.9)

67 (56.8)

20 (22.1)

5.5

Instrumental Support

9 (7.6)

40 (33.9)

50 (42.4)

19 (16.1)

4.92

Planning

2 (1.7)

36 (30.5)

65 (55.1)

15 (12.7)

5.09

Acceptance

6 (5.1)

25 (21.2)

63 (53.4)

24 (20.4)

5.36

Emotional Support

9 (7.6)

57 (48.3)

42 (35.6)

10 (8.4)

4.43

Humor

29 (24.6)

54 (45.7)

21 (17.8)

14 (11.8)

4.06

Positive Refraining

4 (3.4)

45 (38.1)

49 (41.5)

20 (17.0)

4.99

Religion

1 (0.8)

19 (16.1)

41 (34.7)

57 (48.3)

6.19

Behavioral Disengagement

12 (10.2)

60 (50.8)

41 (34.7)

5 (4.2)

4.22

Denial

10 (8.5)

64 (45.7)

44 (40.0)

10 (8.4)

4.5

Self-Distraction

1 (0.8)

39 (33.0)

62 (52.6)

16 (13.5)

5.04

Self-Blame

8 (6.8)

42 (35.6)

45 (38.2)

23 (19.5)

5.06

Substance Use

95 (80.5)

19 (16.1)

3 (2.5)

1 (0.8)

2.38

Venting

9 (7.6)

40 (33.9)

62 (52.5)

7 (5.9)

4.69

Table 3 Frequency and percentage of various coping styles and mean of coping styles score

Stressors

Various stressors including academic stressors and personal stressors are the cause of depression in university undergraduate and postgraduate students. Among the academic stressors, assignments (78%) were the most prevalent cause of depression among students. Frequent examination (75%) and quizzes (71.4%) followed it. Lack of sleep was the most common personal stressor (70%) for the students. Percentages of different stressors are depicted as a bar graph in Figure 1.

Figure 1 Bar graph showing percentages of stressors.

Statistical significance of incidence of depression and various independent variables

Frequent examination, assignments (p=0.003) and quizzes significantly affected the incidence of depression and were also the most common academic stressors for the students. Lack of sleep and social activities were also significantly related to the depression scale. Loneliness, health issues and lack of colleagues support also had a statistically significant association with depression occurrence.

Coping Styles

Determination of different coping styles used by depressed scholars was done by using the standard 28 item brief COPE inventory tool. Various coping styles were used by students with religion being the most common style (mean= 6.19). Whereas, substance use was the least commonly employed coping method (mean = 2.38) by the depressed respondents. Active coping, acceptance and planning were other widely used styles.

Discussion

Depression is a frequent health related problem influencing the health of university scholars, affecting their studies and personal life. Studies from Thailand, India, Malaysia and Pakistan have identified stress in medical students and emphasized the role of academics as an important stressor.20-23 The aim of current study was to determine the incidence of depression, sources of stress for pharmacy students and different coping styles used by the depressed individuals. The study population focused on graduate and undergraduate pharmacy students. The study revealed that female students (64% ) were more depressed as compared to the male students.24 In this study, different sources of stress for the students were also measured. It was observed that students of age group less than 25 years were more depressed. This can be associated to assignments which being a major source of stress, followed by frequent examinations and quizzes. This academic stress may lead to anxiety. Many students marked more than 3 stressors in their life. There was significant association seen in sleeping hours < 8 (p=0.038), colleague support (p=0.011) and students with no social activity (p=0.030) which contradicts the findings of another cross-sectional study conducted on pharmacy students of Pakistan. Among less common stressors were class competition, financial issues and interpersonal relationship problems.24

Depression coping strategies are also involved in this study, and students have various coping styles for this purpose. Therefore, different responses to depression coping methods were observed. According to a significant proportion of depressed university scholars, they find comfort and relief in different religious practices.25 It is considered the easiest way to cope up with depression. Active coping and acceptance were the next most common coping methods. Whereas, substance use as a coping tool was least reported. “Use of alcohol or other drugs to feel better” can possibly account for the minimal score of this question. The other plausible reason may be that the collected data chiefly illustrates females, and men are presumably involved in substance abuse. Additionally, alcohol is a taboo for Muslims. Limitations of the study include need for identification of other factors causing stress to the students. Additionally, different coping styles employed by the depressed individuals must be evaluated for their effectiveness. Limited number of students and, lack of interventional procedures in terms of suggestions/counseling to the depressed respondents and follow up were the other limitations. So, a study should be conducted on a larger scale to evaluate the incidence of depression in the students of other departments for inter-departmental comparison.

Routine mental health assessment of the university students should be carried out by the institution. Practical implications should be made to help the depressed students. Students should be counselled about the use of positive coping styles by which they can tackle their problems effectively rather than moving towards the negative coping strategies such as humor, venting and self-blame. Students should also be provided with opportunities for co-curricular and social activities as according to the study findings, there was a significant association between incidence of depression and lack of social activities. These measures can ameliorate the academic performance of the students by improving the quality of their personal and professional life.

Acknowledgments

None.

Conflicts of interest

None.

References

  1. Mathers C, Fat DM, Boerma JT The global burden of disease: 2004 update. World Health Organization. 2008
  2. Ferrari AJ, Charlson FJ, Norman RE et al. Burden of depressive disorders by country, sex, age, and year: findings from the global burden of disease study 2010. 2013;10(11).
  3. Murray CJ, Lopez AD Global burden of disease. Harvard University Press Boston, USA. 1996
  4. Üstün T, et al. Global burden of depressive disorders in the year 2000. The British journal of psychiatry. 2004;184(5):386‒392.
  5. Mirza I, Jenkins R Risk factors, prevalence, and treatment of anxiety and depressive disorders in Pakistan: systematic review. Bmj. 2004;328(7443):794.
  6. Lyubomirsky S, Kasri F, Zehm K Dysphoric rumination impairs concentration on academic tasks. Cognitive Therapy and Research. 2003;27(3):309‒330.
  7. Ibrahim AK, Kelly SJ, Adams CE et al. A systematic review of studies of depression prevalence in university students. J psychiatr res. 2013;47(3):391‒400.
  8. Blackman GL, Ostrander R, Herman KC Children with ADHD and depression: A multisource, multimethod assessment of clinical, social, and academic functioning. J Atten Disord. 2005;8(4):195‒207.
  9. Garlow SJ, Rosenberg J, Moore JD et al. Depression, desperation, and suicidal ideation in college students: results from the American Foundation for Suicide Prevention College Screening Project at Emory University. Depress anxiety. 2008;25(6):482‒488.
  10. Pitpitan EV, Kalichman SC, Eaton LA et al. Gender‒based violence and HIV sexual risk behavior: alcohol use and mental health problems as mediators among women in drinking venues, Cape Town. Soc Sci Med. 2012;75(8):1417‒1425.
  11. Nduna M, Rachel K Jewkes, Kristin L Dunkle et al. Associations between depressive symptoms, sexual behaviour and relationship characteristics: a prospective cohort study of young women and men in the Eastern Cape, South Africa. J Int AIDS Soc. 2010;13(1):44.
  12. Vitaliano PP, Russo J, Carr JE, Heerwagen JH Medical school pressures and their relationship to anxiety. The Journal of nervous and mental disease. 1984;172(12):730‒736.
  13. Connor‒Smith JK, Compas BE, Wadsworth ME et al. Responses to stress in adolescence: measurement of coping and involuntary stress responses. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.  2000;68(6):976‒972.
  14. Winter Y, Alexei Korchounov, Tatyana V Zhukova et al. Depression in elderly patients with Alzheimer dementia or vascular dementia and its influence on their quality of life. Journal of neurosciences in rural practice. 2011;2(1):27‒32.
  15. Springer DW, Rubin A, Beevers CG Treatment of depression in adolescents and adults: Clinician's guide to evidence‒based practice. 4. 2011
  16. Lim LL, Weining C, Xin Yu et al. Depression in Chinese elderly populations. Asia‐Pacific Psychiatry. 2011;3(2):46‒53.
  17. Gladstone TR, Beardslee WR, and O’Connor EE The prevention of adolescent depression. Psychiatric Clinics of North America. 2011;34(1):35‒52.
  18. McKenzie M, Olsson CA, Jorm AF et al. Association of adolescent symptoms of depression and anxiety with daily smoking and nicotine dependence in young adulthood: findings from a 10‐year longitudinal study. Addiction. 2010;105(9):1652‒1659.
  19. Ceyhan A, Ceyhan E, Kurtyilmaz Y Investigation of university students’ depression. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research. 2009;36:75‒90.
  20. Supe AN A study of stress in medical students at Seth GS Medical College. Journal of postgraduate medicine. 1998;44(1):1‒6.
  21. Saipanish R Stress among medical students in a Thai medical school. Medical teacher. 2003;25(5):502‒506.
  22. Sherina M, Rampal L, Kaneson N Psychological stress among undergraduate medical students. Medical Journal of Malaysia. 2004;59(2):207‒211.
  23. Shaikh BT, Kahloon A, Kazmi M et al. Students, stress and coping strategies: a case of Pakistani medical school. Educ Health. 2004;17(3):346‒353.
  24. Yasmin R, Sidra Sohail Asim, Huma Ali et al. Prevalence of Perceived Stress among Pharmacy students in Pakistan. 2013
  25. Kasi PM, Haider Ali Naqvi, Abaseen Khan Afghan et al. Coping styles in patients with anxiety and depression. ISRN psychiatry. 2012.
Creative Commons Attribution License

©2017 Khalid, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.