Submit manuscript...
International Journal of
eISSN: 2576-4454

Hydrology

Mini Review Volume 7 Issue 2

Mitigation of eutrophication from agricultural runoff: the case of the agricultural region of Moungo in Cameroon

Abanda Well Victorien Bienvenu,1 Martha Eneke Munongo2

1Quality Management System, Dangote Cement, Cameroon
2Quality control, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development, Cameroon

Correspondence: Abanda Well Victorien Bienvenu, Department of Quality Management System, Dangote Cement Cameroon, Cameroon, Tel +237 696871804

Received: April 15, 2023 | Published: May 11, 2023

Citation: Abanda WVB, Martha EM. Mitigation of eutrophication from agricultural runoff: the case of the agricultural region of Moungo in Cameroon. Int J Hydro. 2023;7(2):78-79. DOI: 10.15406/ijh.2023.07.00342

Download PDF

Abstract

Eutrophication is one of the harmful phenomena which affects continental water (rivers, lakes, springs, etc.) due to the injection of N and P. If it is easy to manage point source pollution, non-point source pollution still represents a challenge. Management practices such as tillage technics, fertilizer management, and wetlands appear as solutions to remove N and P from runoff water.

Keywords: eutrophication, fertilizer, tillage, runoff water, P and N

Introduction

Water is the most important resource of the earth. It is used for almost all of man’s needs. Population growth drastically leads to water stress.1 One of the tangible consequences of water stress is the so called eutrophication which is the degradation of water bodies due to excess quantities of nutrients (P and N in particular). One of these nutrients (nitrogen) is mainly derived from agricultural runoffs.2

Agriculture is very important for human beings. Over the years, humans have developed technics to improve crop yields. Fertilizers (organic and inorganic) are key assets used to achieve this goal. Meanwhile, excessive use of fertilizers has detrimental effects on the environment so a balance should be attained to promote a sustainable use of fertilizers.

The aim of this article is to provide solutions to manage non-point source pollution from agricultural land in the Agricultural region of Moungo in Cameroon.

Presentation of the study area

The Moungo division is the highest agricultural sector in the Littoral region of Cameroon. Many agricultural companies such as PHP, SOCAPALM, CDC, and SBM have plantations there. Apart from these industrial plantations, there are local farming associations called “GICs”. These GICs are constituted of people who put together their efforts to manage large crop areas. The main river is the Moungo River from which the name of the division is derived. Almost all types of crops are cultivated here: plantain, banana, pineapple, cassava, rice, etc. The most important areas for crop production are: Souza, Penja, Njombe, Mbanga, Bare and Melong Figure 1–3. In Order to mitigate the impact of runoff waters on the environment, we propose many technics applicable to the area of study.

Figure 1 Plantation located at Bomono.

Figure 2 Plantation located near Souza.

Figure 3 Proximity of agricultural land with the Moungo River.

Beneficial technics

Tillage practice

Tillage is any operation leading to soil disturbance using tools. It is used to improve crop productivity and is helpful in preventing pollution from runoff waters.3,4 There are many types of tillage practices: conservation tillage, conventional tillage, and zero tillage.

Conservation tillage

In conservation tillage practice, crop planting is done in the presence of the residues from the previous campaign. Conservation tillage has many advantages: improve soil structure, control soil erosion, facilitate infiltration of runoff water, and reduce evaporation.5 Conservation tillage is divided into mulch tillage, no-tillage and strip tillage.6

Mulch tillage: conservation tillage with a very low disturbance of the soil

No-tillage: No disturbance of the soil from the harvest of the previous year to the harvest of the current year

Strip tillage: Disturbance occurs only in rows were seeds are planted.

We have seen that conservation tillage has a lot of advantages; meanwhile due to low disturbance of the soil, it increases its compacity and consequently enrichment of N and P near the surface.7 Thus, rotational tillage is often a good option.

Management technics

At least two parameters should be taken into account during the application of fertilizers to mitigate runoffs: the weather and the depth at which fertilizers are inserted into the soil. In fact, if fertilizers are applied during the rainy season, the probability of its removal by runoff water is very high.8 Moreover, when the depth is consistent, the interaction between rainy water and fertilizers is low thus, runoff water contamination by fertilizers is limited.

Care should also be observed regarding the appropriate dose of fertilizers to be applied. Thus, we should always think about P budget as per the below equation from:9

Phosphorus budget =P_Fert + P_Man + P_Atm − P_Grain− P_Res− P_Eros

P_Fert is the input of fertilizer;

P_Man is the input from manure application;

P_Atm is the input from atmospheric deposition;

P_Grain the output from crop harvesting.

Policymakers have to elaborate incentive measures to manage the proper use of fertilizers. In case of interaction between rainy water and fertilizers, ditches may be used to convey that water to outlet see the below Figure 4. The effectiveness of ditches in P removal increases when they are vegetated. If vegetated ditches are associated with Akadama clay barrier, they are able to remove up to (97.1%), (96.9%), and (97.4%) of total P (TP), Particulate P (PP) and dissolved P (DP) respectively.10 Optimising runoff water quality before allowing them to join natural waterbodies appears is the last stage of solution. This can easily be done using wetlands.

Figure 4 Agricultural ditches; source: Yinfeng Xia.5

There are two types of wetlands: natural wetlands (NW) and constructed wetlands (CW). NW are made up of marshes, bogs, mangroves, etc. they are located where the water table is above or very close to the surface. CW are of two types: surface flow wetland and subsurface flow wetland. The efficiency of CW in P and N Removal is higher than the NW one11 and.12–14

Acknowledgments

None.

Conflicts of interest

The author declares there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. FAO; UN Water. Progress on level of water stress Global status and acceleration needs for SDG indicator 6.4.2. ROME. 2021.
  2. Withers PJ, Neal C, Helen P, et al. Agriculture and Eutrophication: Where Do We Go from Here?. Sustainability. 2014;6(9):5853–5875.
  3. David A Lobb, Edward Huffman, Donald C Reicosky. Importance of information on tillage practices in the modelling of environmental processes and in the use of environmental indicators. Journal of Environmental Management. 2007;82(3):377–387.
  4. FAO, IWMI. Water pollution from agriculture: a global review. ROME. 2007. p. 1–35.
  5. Yinfeng Xia MZ. Recent advances in control technologies for non point source pollution with nitrogen and phosphorous from agricultural runoff: current practices and future prospects. The Korean Society for Applied Biological Chemistry. 2020;63:8.
  6. Claassen Roger, Bowman M, McFadden J, et al. Tillage Intensity and Conservation Cropping in the United States. Washington. 2018. p. 1–27.
  7. Wang R, Ma L, Li WL. Rotational Tillage: A Sustainable Management Technique for. MDPI. 2022;12(10):1582.
  8. Baulch HM, Elliott JA, Cordeiro MR, et al. Soil and water management: opportunities to mitigate nutrient losses to surface waters in the Northern Great Plains. Environmental Reviews. 2018;447–477.
  9. Panagos P, Muntwyler A, Liakos L, et al. Phosphorus plant removal from European agricultural land. Journal of Consumer Protection and Food Safety. 2002;5–20.
  10. He Y, Zhou X, Zhang Q, et al. Highly efficient removal of phosphorus from agricultural runoff by a new akadama clay barrier-vegetated drainage ditch system (VDD) and its mechanism. Journal of Environmental Management. 2021;290:112575.
  11. Vymazal J. The Historical Development of Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment. Land. 2022;11(2):174.
  12. Abanda V. How to remediate eutrophic lakes?. 2017. p. 96.
  13. Clausen JC, Jokela WE, Potter FI, et al. Paired watershed comparison of tillage effects on runoff, sediment, and pesticide losses. Environ Qual. 1996;25(5):1000–1007.
  14. Mitchell JP, Pettygrove GS, Upadhyaya S, et al. Classification of Conservation Tillage Practices in California Irrigated Row Crop Systems. ANR. 2009;8364.
Creative Commons Attribution License

©2023 Abanda, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.