Review Article Volume 3 Issue 6
1Locum Consultant Urologist in NHS, UK
2Physical activity and health promotion, Department of Biomedicine and prevention, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Rome Tor vergata, Italy
3Urology Fellow, Western General Hospital, UK
4Urology Physician Associate, Manchester Foundation NHS trust, Egypt
5Consultant Urologist; National Institute of Urology and Nephrology; Cairo, Egypt
Correspondence: Abdalla Ali Deb, Locum Consultant Urologist in NHS – UK, Tel +447456070200
Received: November 28, 2019 | Published: December 12, 2019
Citation: Deb AA, Okechukwu CE, Okechukwu CE, et al. Central obesity and erectile dysfunction in men. Int J Fam Commun Med. 2019;3(6):290-294. DOI: 10.15406/ijfcm.2019.03.00171
Development of intra-abdominal fat is associated with poor dietary habits and a sedentary lifestyle. The aim of this review was to analyse the relationship between central obesity and erectile dysfunciton (ED). The presence of a metabolic syndrome, associated with ED, is not characterized by a BMI value alone, but also takes into consideration an individual’s waist circumference, body fat percentage, circulating levels of triacylglycerols, levels of low density lipoprotein (LDL) and high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol, glycemic control and blood pressure. Of these factors, waist circumference (WC) was shown to be important in the diagnosis and treatment of both abdominal obesity and ED. WC is a strong indicator of an accumulation of visceral fat and a high WC in men is a risk factor for erectile dysfunction (ED), suggesting that ED is a complication of obesity, although the exact mechanisms of how obesity impacts ED on a molecular level are not well understood.
Keywords: visceral obesity, erectile dysfunction, sexual dysfunction
ED, erectile dysfunction; LDL, low density lipoprotein; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; WC, waist circumference; WHO, the world health organization; BMI, body mass index; DM, diabetes mellitus; CRP, c-reactive protein; MS, metabolic syndrome; MET, metabolic equivalent
The World Health Organization (WHO)1 defines obesity as an excessive accumulation of fat that presents a risk to health. WHO crudely characterises body weight by first determining the body mass index (BMI) of an individual. BMI is calculated as body weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared. Based on the value calculated, individuals with a BMI of 25 to 29.9 kg/m2 are classified as overweight while obesity is identified as a BMI value of ≥30 kg/m2. Obesity is further subdivided into three categories: class I (BMI ranging from 30 to 34.9 kg/m2), class II (BMI ranging from 35.0 to 39.9 kg/m2), and class III (BMI ≥40 kg/m2).2 At least 30% of the male population in North America, Europe, Australia and Asia are obese.3,4 Obesity, in particular the accumulation of abdominal fat is a major risk factor in the development of a number of chronic diseases and is often the result of poor diet, sleep disorders and a sedentary lifestyle. Intra-abdominal visceral fat contains hypertrophied adipocytes, and are resistant to insulin.5 High level of free fatty acid and glycerol in the portal vein leads to free fatty acidemia and hyperglycerolemia which results to an increased production of triacylglycerol-bound lipoproteins and glucose in the liver.6 Obesity is not characterised by BMI value alone, but an individual’s waist circumference, waist-hip ratio, circulating levels of triacylglycerols, levels of low density lipoprotein (LDL) and high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol, fasting glucose and blood pressure are considered.7 Visceral obesity, irrespective of other body fat deposits, is a major risk factor for systemic inflammation and cardiovascular disease.8
Waist circumference is one of the most important factors in the diagnosis of abdominal obesity,9 and is a strong indicator of an accumulation of intra-abdominal fat.10 According to WHO, a waist circumference greater than 94cm, classifies a man as obese.19 However waist circumference is not used alone. Body fat percentage and BMI are also taken into consideration (Table 1) and (Table 2).11 A greater waist circumference in men has been shown to be a risk factor for erectile dysfunction (ED).12 ED is the inability to attain and/or maintain a penile erection sufficient enough to allow satisfactory sexual intercourse. It is a common sexual dysfunction, the incidence of which varies with ethnicity and increases with age.13 The presence of atherosclerotic vessels in the penis is thought to be one of the major causes of organic ED.14 There is a strong link between organic ED and the risk factors associated with atherosclerosis, such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus (DM), dyslipidaemia, a sedentary lifestyle, obesity, and smoking.15,16 The severity of ED is known to correlate with the number and severity of the aforementioned risk factors, i.e. the more risk factors a person has the higher the incidence of ED.17 Obesity has a significant impact on whether or not an individual develops ED but the exact correlation is not fully understood. This paper highlights the need for further research incorporating frontline data from clinicians and close collaboration with the scientific community, to better understand the role central obesity has in the development of ED. The aim of this review was to analyse the relationship between visceral obesity and ED.
Anthropometric condition |
BMI (kg/m2) |
Comment |
Under weight |
<18.5 |
- |
Normal |
18.5–24.9 |
- |
Over weight |
25.0–29.9 |
Increased |
Obesity (class) |
||
I |
30.0–34.9 |
High |
II |
35.0–39.9 |
Very High |
III (extreme obesity) |
≥40 |
Extremely High |
Table 1 Classification of Obesity based on Body Mass Index (BMI)
Waist circumference (WC) |
Men |
Women |
Comment |
Normal |
≤102 cm |
≤88 cm |
- |
High |
>102 cm |
>88 cm |
High risk of abdominal obesity coupled with other metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular disease |
Table 2 Classification of Waist Circumference (WC) in men and women
Studies |
Classification of obesity (kg/m2) |
Results |
Feldman et al.15a |
BMI>28 vs others |
Positive associationb |
Derby et al.29a |
BMI⩾30 vs others |
Positive associationb |
Shiri et al.40 |
Obesity: BMI⩾30 vs |
Positive association |
Overweight: BMI: 25–29.9 or |
||
Normal: BMI: 18.5–24.5 |
||
Fung et al.25 |
BMI>28 vs others |
Positive associationb |
Cross-sectional |
||
Feldman et al.15a |
>120% ideal body weight vs others |
No association |
Chung et al.41 |
<120% ideal body weight vs ⩾20% |
Positive association |
Blanker et al.42 |
BMI <25 vs BMI⩾25 |
Positive associationb |
Bacon et al.30 |
BMI <23.2 vs BMI >28.7 |
Positive association |
Adolfsson et al.43 |
Obesity: BMI⩾30 vs |
No ED results. |
Overweight: BMI: 25–29.9 |
Found significant decreased sexual desire |
|
Normal: BMI: 18.5–24.5 |
||
Gunduz et al.44c |
Obesity: BMI⩾30 |
Positive association |
Overweight: BMI: 25–29.9 |
||
Normal: BMI: 18.5–24.5 |
||
Giugliano et al.45 |
BMI >28.7 vs others |
Positive association |
Table 3 Prospective and cross-sectional observational studies on the association between obesity and ED in men
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; ED, erectile dysfunction a: Data from the MMAS (Massachusetts Male Aging study) b: Statistically significant c: Coronary artery disease patients
Search strategy
Studies that reported on obesity and ED in men from 1994 to 2018, published in English were included in this review. The following electronic databases were used: PubMed, and Science Direct. These databases were searched by combining one or more of the following keywords: Visceral obesity, Body Mass Index, erectile dysfunction, metabolic syndrome, waist circumference and sexual dysfunction. The MeSH system was used to search and extract relevant research studies from PubMed.
Types of studies
Original articles, meta-analyses, systematic reviews and WHO Technical Report.
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Articles were selected based on specificity. Articles were required to discuss at least one of the following: central obesity and ED, obesity and ED, BMI and ED, waist circumference and ED. Articles that did not compare these factors were deemed irrelevant and excluded in the final review. In total 55 studies were included in this review. Figure 1 below represents a schematic view of data extraction and the management of that data.
Pathogenesis of erectile dysfunction in obesity
According to the literature reviewed, the pathogenesis of ED in obese males was multifactorial and may not only be attributed to endothelial dysfunction due to destructive inflammatory processes , but also to hypogonadism, as testosterone levels were often low in obese males with ED.18 Obesity is considered as a pro-inflammatory state, which leads to both endocrine and endothelial dysfunction, resulting in ED. Peri-visceral adipocytes were shown to significantly increase the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines, than other types of adipocyte found within the body27,28 and weight loss was shown to reduce the serum concentrations of the inflammatory markers C-reactive protein (CRP), and interleukin (IL-8 & IL-6), indicating that like all obesity related disorders, weight loss is often beneficial and should be considered as first line treatment.20,21
The relationship between erectile dysfunction and central obesity
The prevalence of ED was higher in males with a BMI of 25-30 kg/m2, and significantly higher in those with a BMI >30 kg/m2 than those with a BMI which is considered normal (<25 kg/m2). The waist-to-hip ratio and abdominal circumference was independently associated with a higher risk of ED.22,23,24,25 Riedner et al.26 showed that central obesity was a predictor of ED among males aged 61 to 81 years, along with other associated factors such as, excessive alcoholic intake, smoking, sedentary lifestyle, hyperglycaemia, increased BMI, dyslipidaemia and hypogonadism.26 Similar results were obtained in European studies.31,32,33 Central obesity is a predictor of ED even in the absence of other risk factors such as diabetes mellitus and hypertension.34 Moreover, a significant association between central obesity and ED was identified among young males without a history of systemic disease.35 Several studies showed a strong association between ED and metabolic syndrome (MS).36,37 However, Kupelian et al.36 concluded that ED was a risk factor for the development of metabolic syndrome.37 Bacon et al.37 investigated Sexual health and function in men older than 50 years of age. The study showed that physical activity was associated with a lower risk of erectile dysfunction at >32.6 metabolic equivalent (MET) hours of exercise week-1 against 0 to 2.7 MET hours of exercise week-1, and obesity (body mass index >28.7 kg/m2 vs. <23.2 kg/m2) was associated with higher risk.38
Cigarette Smoking, alcohol consumption, and time spent while watching the television were associated with the risk of ED, men who had no chronic medical conditions and frequently engaged in healthy behaviors had the lowest prevalence, however lifestyle modifiable factors most strongly associated with ED were physical inactivity and obesity.38 In a survey of health professionals, obesity was found to be associated with a 1.3-fold increased risk of ED.39 In a prospective study of risk factors for ED, obesity and smoking were found to be positively associated with ED, but physical activity was inversely associated with the risk of developing ED during a 14-year follow-up period.30
According to the Massachusetts Male Aging study, there was no association between BMI and ED.15 In contrast, a cross-sectional study including 2,126 men showed an identifiable but weak relationship between obesity and ED,46 the study revealed that central obesity was associated with the development of erectile dysfunction in patients older than 60 years.46 The presence of erectile dysfunction can be determined by sagittal abdominal diameter; abdominal diameter-height index, WC and waist-hip index.47 Exercise and obesity interventions were effective in the prevention of ED by increasing the level of circulating adiponectin.48,49 Sowers,50 suggested that physical activity is effective in reducing circulating C-reactive protein (CRP) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNFα),thereby decreasing inflammation, endothelial cell apoptosis and adhesion molecules expression, possibly leading to a reduced incidence of ED. Lifestyle interventions led to improvements in the five-question International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) scores in men with ED.51 This modification can be achieved by participating in regular exercise, diabetes control, blood pressure control, and a weight loss program 52. The use of statins for lowering lipid levels also appeared to improve ED,53 implicating the role of cholesterol and the destructive process of atherosclerosis in ED. In support of this a prospective study by Esposito et al.54 including 55 men with ED treated by caloric reduction and consistent exercise, showed that there was 31% regain of normal erectile function in the treatment group compared to 2% in the control.54 A study conducted by Kalka et al.55 demonstrated that patients with ischemic heart disease had limited knowledge on the relationship between cardiovascular risk factors and ED, suggesting the need for an education aspect of ED treatment.
Based on the evaluated studies there is an association between visceral obesity, and erectile dysfunction in men. However, the pathophysiological mechanisms of how this occurs, largely how penile microcirculation is interrupted by an accumulation of visceral fat is still unknown. In the subgroup of obese men, the prevalence of ED is much higher than in those men that are not classified as obese, but prevalence also increases with age and differs amongst ethnicity. What is apparent is that obesity isn’t alone as a possible causative agent of organic ED. Equally, leading a generally unhealthy lifestyle, being a smoker and consuming increased amounts of alcohol, all play a role, that could be exacerbated further by obesity. Further research is required in order to fully understand the role obesity has in ED.
None.
The author declares there is no conflict of interest.
©2019 Deb, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.