Submit manuscript...
International Journal of
eISSN: 2381-1803

Complementary & Alternative Medicine

Correspondence:

Received: January 01, 1970 | Published: ,

Citation: DOI:

Download PDF

Abstract

In this study, we report on the antifungal activity in vitro of the essential oils of Plectranthus neochilus and Tagetes erecta cultivated in Brazil against fungi that cause dermatomycoses and aspergillosis in terms of their minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC). Our results revealed that the essential oil of P. neochilus displays promising antifungal activity against R. stolonifera (MIC=125μg/mL). On the other hand, the essential oil of T. erecta demonstrated be inactive against the selected dermatophytes (MIC>,000μg/mL). These data suggest that the essential oil of P. neochilus could be a good alternative in the control of R. stolonifera, because there is a great interest in the use of natural antifungal compounds for the control of this fungus.

Keywords: antifungal activity, essential oil, plectranthus neochilus; tagetes erecta, human immunodeficiency virus, HIV

Abbreviations

IA, invasive aspergillosis; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; PN-EO, essential oil of plectranthus neochilus; TE-EO, essential oil of tagetes erecta; GC-FID, gas chromatography with flame ionization; GC-MS, gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry; EI-MS, electron ionization mass spectrometry; RI, retention index; ATCC, american type culture collection; DMSO, dimethylsulfoxide; MIC, minimum inhibitory concentration; MOPS, 3-(N-Morpholino)propanesulfonic acid; CFU, colony-forming unit

Introduction

In recent years, the occurrence of clinical infections has increased dramatically. The considerable use of antifungal agents, there has been a remarkable increase in drug resistance among infections species.1 The diseases most common caused by fungi are dermatomycoses and aspergillosis, where the dermatomycoses result from superficial fungal infections of the skin, hair, or nails, which could affect the human health and quality of life2,3 not only in underdeveloped countries but also in elderly and immunocompromised patients worldwide.4 Over the years, the dermatomycosis has had a considerable increase, being that their treatment is still based on the use of triazoles (fluconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole), imidazoles (ketoconazole), allylamines (terbinafine), and griseofulvin.5 However, due to the increase in the number of individuals immunocompromised by HIV, transplanted individuals and individuals undergoing cancer treatment, there was a reduction in the number of effective drugs against many dermatopathogens.6 In Brazil, human fungal infections are prevalent, but these diseases caused by fungi are not officially reportable.7 About 80% of the cases of infectious pneumonic mortality in immunocompromised patients are caused by invasive aspergillosis (IA), where the health problems caused by Aspergillus include allergic reactions, lung infections, and infections in other organs.8 Amphotericin is most frequently employed in conventional therapy, but its limited efficacy and poor patient tolerance to side effects culminates in response rates of only about 35% and high mortality.9 Although the synthetic fungicides are effective, the development of fungal resistance, toxicity to non-target organisms and environmental problems is due to its continuous or repeated application.10 The search for antifungal compounds from natural sources has increased over the last decade, and plants continue to be a major source of biologically active compounds that may provide lead structures for the development of new drugs.11 In this scenario, essential oils constitute a rich source of bioactive chemicals and have been recently pointed out as a promising alternative against the pathogenic fungi.12–15

The herbaceous and aromatic plant Plectranthus neochilus is popularly known as “boldo-rasteiro” in Brazil.16 The essential oil of P. neochilus displays antimicrobial,17 antischistosomal,16 and insecticidal,18 activities. On the other hand, Tagetes erecta L., commonly known as “marigold” in many countries and as “cravo-de-defunto” in Brazil, is an annual aromatic and branched herb native to Mexico. The essential oil from its leaves is utilized as antihelminthic in the Amazonia region.19 Despite the different reported biological activities of these plants, the antifungal effects of its essential oil have not yet been investigated. Thus, as part of our ongoing interest in the biological activities of essential oils, in this work, we now report the chemical composition and the antifungal activity in vitro against fungi that cause dermatomycoses and aspergillosis of the essential oils obtained from leaves of P. neochilus (PN-EO) and T. erecta (TE-EO) grown in Brazil.

Materials and methods

Plant materials

Adult P. neochilus Schltr. (Lamiaceae) and T. erecta L. (Asteraceae) leaves were collected at “May 13th Farm” (20°26’S 47°27’W 977m) in May 2011. The collection site was located near the city of Franca, state of São Paulo, Brazil. These species were identified by Professor Dr. Milton Groppo, who received a voucher specimen each (SPFR 12323 for P. neochilus and SPFR10014 for T. erecta). Subsequently, these species were deposited at the Herbarium of the Department of Biology (Herbarium SPFR), University of São Paulo, Brazil.

Essential oil extraction

Fresh leaves of P. neochilus and T. erecta were submitted to hydrodistillation in a Clevenger-type apparatus for 3h. To this end, 1200g of the plant material was divided into three samples of 400g each, and 500mL of distilled water was added to each sample. Condensation of the steam followed by accumulation of the essential oil/water system in the graduated receiver of the apparatus separated the essential oil from the water, which allowed for further manual collection of the organic phase. Anhydrous sodium sulfate was used to remove traces of water. Samples were stored in an amber bottle and kept in the refrigerator at 4°C until analysis. Yields were calculated from the weight of the fresh leaves.

Gas Chromatography (GC-FID) analyses

The essential oil of P. neochilus (PN-EO) and T. erecta (TE-EO) were analyzed by gas chromatography (GC) on a Hewlett-Packard G1530A 6890 gas chromatograph fitted with FID and a data-handling processor. An HP-5 (Hewlett-Packard, Palo Alto, CA, USA) fused-silica capillary column (length=30m, i.d.=0.25mm, and film thickness=0.33𝜇m) was employed. The column temperature was programmed to rise from 60 to 240°C at 3°C/min and then held at 240°C for 5 min. The carrier gas was H2 at a flow rate of 1.0mL/min. The equipment was set to the injection mode; the injection volume was 0.1𝜇L (split ratio of 1:10). The injector and detector temperatures were 240 and 280°C, respectively. The relative concentrations of the components were obtained by peak area normalization (%). The relative areas were the average of triplicate GC-FID analyses.

Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS) analyses

GC-MS analyses were carried out on a Shimadzu QP2010 Plus (Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan) system equipped with an AOC-20i autosampler. The column consisted of Rtx5MS (Restek Co., Bellefonte, PA, USA) fused-silica capillary (length=30m, i.d.=0.25mm, and film thickness=0.25𝜇m).The electron ionization mass spectrometry (EI-MS) mode at 70eV was employed. Helium (99.99%) at a constant flow of 1.0mL/min was the carrier gas. The injection volume was 0.1𝜇L (split ratio of 1:10). The injector and the ion source temperatures were set at 240 and 280°C, respectively. The oven temperature program was the same as the one used for GC-FID. The mass spectra were registered with a scan interval of 0.5 s in the mass range of 40 to 600 Da.

Identification of the PN-EO constituents

PN-EO and TE-EO compounds were identified on the basis of their retention indices relative to a homologous series of n-alkanes (C8-C20). To this end, an Rtx-5MS capillary column was employed under the same operating conditions as in the case of GC. The retention index (RI) of each constituent was determined as described previously.20 The chemical structures were computer-matched with the Wiley7, NIST08, and FFNSC1.2 spectral libraries of the GC-MS data system; their fragmentation patterns were compared with the literature data.21

Antifungal activity in vitro

Antifungal assays were performed using isolated Aspergillus fumigatus (JA13a) and Rhizopus stolonifer (JA08a) strains belonging to the fungus collection of the Department of Biology of the Faculty of Phylosophy, Sciences, and Letters of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo. Aspergillus brasiliensis (ATCC 16404) were also included in this experiment. The antifungal activity of the tested compounds against the fungi was evaluated in terms of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) according to protocol CLSI M38-A2.22 The PN-EO and TE-EO samples were dissolved in dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) and diluted in buffered (0.165M of MOPS) RPMI 1640 medium (R8755) in order to obtain a concentration of 2mg/ml. The strain inoculums were suspended in 0.85% saline solution, to obtain concentrations of 1x105CFU/mL. Then, 100μl of the cell suspensions were added to 96-well microplates containing medium and 100μL of one of the previously prepared solutions of PN-EO and TE-EO to obtain spore concentrations of 5x104CFU/ml. The microplates were incubated in an orbital shaker apparatus at 30°C and 100rpm for seven days. The samples were evaluated at concentrations ranging of 500-0.244μg/ml. A resazurin (Sigma-Aldrich®) aqueous solution (0.02%) was employed to determine microorganism viability. In these assays, Ketoconazole (concentrations varying from 40 to 0.019μg/ml) was achieved as the positive control for these assays. All the assays were carried out in triplicate.

Results and discussion

This work relied on minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values to evaluate the antifungal activity of the essential oils of P. neochilus (PN-EO) and T. erecta (TE-EO) against fungi that cause dermatomycoses and aspergillosis; Ketoconazole was used as positive control. Table 1 summarizes the MIC values. According to the literature, samples with MIC values lower than 100μg/mL, between 500 and 1,000μg/mL, and higher than 1,000μg/mL correspond to promising, moderate, and weak activities, respectively, whereas MIC values higher than 1000μg/mL denotes inactivity.23 In this context, PN-EO displayed weak activity against A. brasiliensis (MIC>2,000μg/mL) and A. fumigatus (MIC=2,000μg/mL), but it showed significant antifungal activity against R. stolonifera (MIC=125μg/mL). Hydrodistillation of P. neochilus leaves afforded PN-EO in 0.03%±0.01 (w/w) yields. Gas chromatography revealed the presence of 31 compounds and the major PN-EO constituents (Figure 1) were 𝛼-pinene (1; 14.1%), 𝛽-pinene (2; 7.1%), trans-caryophyllene (3; 29.8%), and caryophyllene oxide (4; 12.8%), as shown in Table 2. Abi-Ayad & co-workers24 reported the antifungal activity of Aleppo pine essential oil against A. flavus, A. niger, Fusarium oxysporum, and R. stolonifer. According to them, the antifungal activity was due to the presence of caryophyllene oxide with 52% of predominance in the essential oil. Our essential oil is characterized by the presence of important concentrations of trans-caryophyllene (29.8%), 𝛼-pinene (14.1%), and caryophyllene oxide (12.8%). Thus, the antifungal properties of this oil can be atrbuted to the content of these main components that likely act in a synergistic manner and their mutual interaction plays an important role in the overall activity of this essential oil. Moreover, caryophyllene_oxide is known for its use as preservative in foods, drugs, and cosmetics.24 and it is tested as an antifungal against dermatophytes in onychomycoses with significant results.25

On the other hand, TE-EO was inactive against all the assayed fungi with MIC values higher than 1,000μg/mL. The yield of TE-EO obtained by hydrodistillation was 0.36% (w/w fresh leaves). Gas chromatography revealed that monoterpenes (96.8%) are the main constituents (Figure 1) of TE-EO, being α-terpinolene (1; 17.9%), (E)-ocymenone (2; 12.9%), dihydrotagetone (3; 11.8%), piperitone (4; 8.8%), verbenone (5; 9.7%), and limonene (6; 10.4%) its major constituents (Table 3). Investigation of Stević et al.26 suggested that the low antifungal activity of essential oil of lemon, orange, and eucalyptus against twenty one fungi isolated from medicinal drugs can be explained by dominance of limonene, which is considered the weakest inhibitor of fungal growth among the pure monoterpene compounds.26 Our results suggest that limonene may act in an antagonistic manner between the constituents in TE-EO contributing to its low antifungal activity. Thus, the antifungal activity of essential oils appears to result from a combination of different molecules present in essential oils due to their several modes of action, which can increase membrane permeability, destroying the external membrane of the fungi,27,28 or lead to a decrease in the size of the fungi and thus a modification of their cell morphology.29

Figure 1 Chemical structures of the main chemical constituents identified in the essential oil of the leaves of P. neochilus and T. erecta.

Essential Oils

A. Brasiliensis

A. Fumigatus

R. Stolonifer

PN-EO

> 2000μg/mL

2000μg/mL

125μg/mL

TE-EO

> 2000μg/mL

1000μg/mL

1000μg/mL

Positive Control
Ketoconazole

1.25 µg/ml

1.25µg/ml

2.50 µg/ml

Table 1 Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values (𝜇g/mL) obtained for the essential oil of P. neochilus (PN-EO) and T. erecta against selected fungi

xc

RT [min]a

RIexpb

RIlitc

Content [%]d

Identificatione

α-thujene

5

921

924

6.3

RI, MS

α-pinene (1)

5.19

929

932

14.1

RI, MS

thuja-2,4(10)-diene

5.43

939

941

0.2

RI, MS

camphene

5.62

943

947

0.1

RI, MS

sabinene

6.21

966

971

1.9

RI, MS

b-pinene (2)

6.37

975

977

7.1

RI, MS

b-myrcene

6.65

985

988

0.3

RI, MS

cctan-3-ol

6.9

993

996

0.2

RI, MS

α-terpinene

7.53

1015

1016

0.5

RI, MS

o-cimene

7.79

1022

1023

0.3

RI, MS

limonene

7.94

1026

1027

0.2

RI, MS

(Z)-b-ocymene

8.14

1030

1033

0.4

RI, MS

(E)-b-ocymene

8.5

1040

1043

1.8

RI, MS

g-terpinene

8.94

1052

1055

1.4

RI, MS

a-terpinolene

9.94

1080

1084

0.2

RI, MS

4-terpineol

13.75

1177

1179

1.2

RI, MS

α-cubebene

20.78

1341

1344

0.5

RI, MS

α-copaene

21.97

1366

1372

1.2

RI, MS

b-bourbonene

22.29

1380

1379

1.1

RI, MS

b-cubenene

22.5

1378

1384

0.3

RI, MS

trans-caryophyllene (3)

23.8

1412

1415

29.8

RI, MS

α-humulene

25.25

1448

1450

1.5

RI, MS

germacrene D

26.3

1470

1476

6.2

RI, MS

eremophilene

27.51

1504

1505

3.9

RI, MS

α-amorphene

27.61

1506

1508

0.4

RI, MS

d-cadinene

27.83

1514

1513

1.9

RI, MS

(E)-nerolidol

29.63

1554

1559

0.3

RI, MS

caryophyllene oxide (4)

30.26

1571

1575

12.8

RI, MS

unknown

32.06

---

1622

0.3

RI, MS

epi-α-cadinol

32.62

1634

1637

1.5

RI, MS

d-cadinol

32.7

1636

1639

0.8

RI, MS

α-cadinol

33.12

1647

1650

1.3

RI, MS

Monoterpenes hydrocarbons:

35

Oxygenated monoterpenes:

1.2

Sesquiterpenes hydrocarbons:

46.8

Oxygenated sesquiterpenes:

16.7

Not identified:

 

 

 

0.3

Table 2 Chemical composition of the essential oil from the leaves of P. neochilus identified by GC-MS

aRT: Retention time determined on the Rtx-5MS capillary column.

bRIexp: Retention index determined relative to n-alkanes (C8–C20) on the Rtx-5MS column.

cRIlit: Retention index.

dCalculated from the peak area relative to the total peak area.

eRI, comparison of the retention index with the literature; 21 MS, comparison of the mass spectrum with the literature.

Chemical compound

RT [min]a

RIexpb

RIlitc

Content [%]d

Identificatione

α-pinene

5.19

931

939

0.5

RI, MS

camphene

5.62

947

953

0.2

RI, MS

sabinene

6.2

971

976

0.9

RI, MS

α-phellandrene

7.2

1007

1005

0.5

RI, MS

Limonene (6)

7.94

1026

1027

10.4

RI, MS

(Z)-b-ocymene

8.13

1030

1033

4.2

RI, MS

(E)-b-ocymene

8.5

1040

1043

0.5

RI, MS

Dihydrotagetone (3)

8.69

1049

1054

11.8

RI, MS

a-terpinolene (1)

9.93

1080

1084

17.9

RI, MS

linalool

10.5

1100

1098

0.4

RI, MS

1,3,8-p-mentatriene

11

1112

1111

0.8

RI, MS

(Z)-ocymene oxide

11.65

1128

1128

0.6

RI, MS

(E)-tagetone

12.58

1151

1146

7

RI, MS

linalool propionate

14.38

1194

1174

0.6

RI, MS

verbenone (5)

15.9

1230

1218

9.7

RI, MS

(E)-ocymenone (2)

16.22

1238

1239

12.9

RI, MS

piperitone (4)

16.84

1252

1282

8.8

RI, MS

piperitenone

20.4

1335

1342

9.7

RI, MS

trans-caryophyllene

23.77

1414

1418

1.2

RI, MS

precocene I

25.6

1458

1467

1.4

RI, MS

Monoterpenes hydrocarbons:

35.9

Oxygenated monoterpenes:

60.9

Sesquiterpenes hydrocarbons:

2.6

Others:

 

 

 

 

0.6

Table 3 Chemical composition of the essential oil from the leaves of T. erecta identified by GC-MS

aRT: Retention time determined on the Rtx-5MS capillary column.
bRIexp: Retention index determined relative to n-alkanes (C8–C20) on the Rtx-5MS column.
cRIlit: Retention index.
dCalculated from the peak area relative to the total peak area.
eRI, comparison of the retention index with the literature;21 MS, comparison of the mass spectrum with the literature.

Conclusion

The results obtained from this study showed that the essential oil of P. neochilus (PN-EO) displays promising antifungal activity against R. stolonifera (MIC=125μg/mL). On the other hand, the essential oil of T. erecta (TE-EO) demonstrated be inactive against the selected dermatophytes (MIC>1,000μg/mL). Thus, our results suggest that PN-EO could be a good alternative in the control of R. stolonifera, because there is a great interest in the use of natural antifungal compounds for the control of fungi as R. stolonifera, which has importance in the postharvest agricultural system and food industry, and are also responsible for diseases in plants and humans as the parlous disease called zygomycosis in which fungal infection are seen in face and oropharyngeal cavity. This is the first report on the antifungal activity of the essential oils from the leaves of P. neochilus and T. erecta to date.

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the Brazilian Foundations FAPESP (Proc. 2007/54241-8), for financial support. We would like to thank Professor Dr. Antonio Eduardo Miller Crotti by technical support.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. He X, Ma Y, Yi G, et al. Chemical composition and antifungal activity of Carica papaya Linn. seed essential oil against Candida spp. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2017;64(5):350–354.
  2. Havlickova B, Czaika VA, Friedrich M. Epidemiological trends in skin mycoses worldwide. Mycoses. 2008;51(2–15).
  3. Ameen M. Epidemiology of superficial fungal infections. Clin Dermatol. 2010;28(2):197–201.
  4. Abd Elmegeed AM, Ouf SA, Moussa TAA, et al. Dermatophytes and other associated fungi in patients attending to some hospitals in Egypt. Braz J Microbiol. 2015;46(3):799–805.
  5. Dias HJ, Aquaroni NAS, Pietro RCLR, et al. Antifungal activity of dihydrobenzofuran neolignans. MOJ Proteomics & Bioinformatics. 2017;6(4):00201.
  6. Meis JFGM, Verweij PE. Current management of fungal infections. Drugs. 2001;61(13–25).
  7. Giacomazzi J, Baethgen L, Carneiro LC, et al. The burden of serious human fungal infections in Brazil. Mycoses. 2016;59(3):145–150.
  8. Karthaus M, Buchheidt D. Invasive aspergillosis: new insights into disease, diagnostic and treatment. Curr Pharm Design. 2013;19(20):3569–3594.
  9. Botero Aguirre JP, Restrepo Hamid AM. Amphotericin B deoxycholate versus liposomal amphotericin B: effects on kidney function. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2015;(11):CD010481.
  10. Sameza ML, Mabou LCN, Tchameni SN, et al. Evaluation of Clove Essential Oil as a Mycobiocide Against Rhizopus stolonifer and Fusarium solani, Tuber Rot Causing Fungi in Yam (Dioscorea rotundata Poir.). J Phytopathol. 2016;164(7–8):433–440.
  11. Magalhaes LG, Kapadia GJ, Tonuci LRD, et al. In vitro schistosomicidal effects of some phloroglucinol derivatives from Dryopteris species against Schistosoma mansoni adult worms. Parasitol Res. 2010;106(2):395–401.
  12. Jain N, Sharma M. Evaluation of citrus lemon essential oil for its chemical and biological properties against fungi causing dermatophytic infection in human beings. Analytical Chemistry Letters. 2017;7(3):402–409.
  13. Wei YX, Xu XY, Song X. A review of antifungal natural products against the pathogenic fungi causing athletes' foot disease. Curr Org Chem. 2017;21(18):1907–1919.
  14. Jain N, Sharma M. Chemical composition of the leaf oil of cymbopogon martinii var. sofia collected from udaipur, rajasthan and their screening against fungi causing dermatophytosis in human beings. J Essent Oil Bear Pl. 2017;20(3):801–808.
  15. Mahboubi M. Artemisia sieberi Besser essential oil and treatment of fungal infections. Biomed Pharmacother. 2017;89(1):1422–1430.
  16. Caixeta SC, Magalhaes LG, de Melo NI, et al. Chemical composition and in vitro schistosomicidal activity of the essential oil of Plectranthus neochilus grown in Southeast Brazil. Chem Biodivers. 2011;8(11):2149–2157.
  17. Crevelin EJ, Caixeta SC, Dias H, et al. Antimicrobial Activity of the Essential Oil of Plectranthus neochilus against Cariogenic Bacteria. Evid–Based Compl Alt Med. 2011;2015:102317.
  18. Baldin ELL, Crotti AEM, Wakabayashi KAL, et al. Plant–derived essential oils affecting settlement and oviposition of Bemisia tabaci (Genn.) biotype B on tomato. J Pest Sci. 2013;86(2):301–308.
  19. Tonuci LRS, Melo NId, Dias HJ, et al. In vitro schistosomicidal effects of the essential oil of Tagetes erecta. Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia. 2011;22(1):88–93.
  20. Vandendool H, Kratz PD. A generalization of retention index system including linear temperature programmed gas–liquid partition chromatography. J Chromatogr. 1963;11(4):463–471.
  21. Adams RP. Identification of Essential Oils Components by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry. 4th ed. Allured Publishing Corporation, Carol Stream, USA; 2007. 804 p.
  22. NCCLS. Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptilibity testing of filamentous fungi: Approved Standard M–38A2, Wayne, Pensilvania, USA: National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards; 2008.
  23. Pessini GL, Dias BP, Nakamura CV, et al. Antifungal activity of the extracts and neolignans from Piper regnellii (miq.) C. DC. var. pallescens (C. DC.) Yunck. J Brazil Chem Soc. 2005;16(6A):1130–1133.
  24. Abi–Ayad M, Abi–Ayad FZ, Lazzouni HA, et al. Chemical composition and antifungal activity of Aleppo pine essential oil. J Med Plants Res. 2011;5(22):5433–5436.
  25. Yang D, Michel L, Chaumont JP, et al. Use of caryophyllene oxide as an antifungal agent in an in vitro experimental model of unychomycosis. Mycopathologia. 1999;148(1):79–82.
  26. Stević T, Berić T, Šavikin K, et al. Antifungal activity of selected essential oils against fungi isolated from medicinal plant. Industrial Crops and Products. 2014;55(1):116–122.
  27. Helander IM, Alakomi HL, Latva–Kala K, et al. Characterization of the action of selected essential oil components on gram–negative bacteria. J Agr Food Chem. 1998;46(9):3590–3595.
  28. Lambert RJ, Skandamis PN, Coote PJ, et al. A study of the minimum inhibitory concentration and mode of action of oregano essential oil, thymol and carvacrol. J Appl Microbiol. 2001;91(3):453–462.
  29. Merghni A, Dallel I, Noumi E, et al. Antioxidant and antiproliferative potential of biosurfactants isolated from Lactobacillus casei and their anti–biofilm effect in oral Staphylococcus aureus strains. Microb Pathogenesis. 2017;104:84–89.
Creative Commons Attribution License

© . This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.