Submit manuscript...
International Journal of
eISSN: 2574-9862

Avian & Wildlife Biology

Research Article Volume 2 Issue 6

Effects of protein levels on growth and laying performance of the Malawian indigenous chicken

Wisdom Kalinda, Jonathan Tanganyika

Lilongwe University of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Malawi

Correspondence: Jonathan Tanganyika, Animal Science Department, Bunda campus, Lilongwe University of Agriculture and Natural Resources (LUANAR), PO Box 219, Lilongwe, Malawi

Received: July 12, 2017 | Published: December 20, 2017

Citation: Kalinda W, Tanganyika J. Effects of protein levels on growth and laying performance of the Malawian indigenous chicken. Int J Avian & Wildlife Biol. 2017;2(6):169-171. DOI: 10.15406/ijawb.2017.02.00037

Download PDF

Abstract

The present study was conducted on growth and laying performance of indigenous chicken fed ration with different crude protein at Bunda campus students` farm. Nutrition remains one of the challenges that indigenous chickens experience under smallholder management system. The birds are dependent on scavenging feed resources which is associated with inadequate nutrition and chickens sometimes are supplemented with maize bran and left over’s depending on the availability. Little has been done to determine the nutrition requirements of indigenous chickens. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate effects of different protein levels on growth and laying performance of IC specifically to determine optimal protein requirement of indigenous chickens and assessing the growth and laying performance of the indigenous chicken. The study used repeated measure design where 7 day old chickens weighing 590±73g were randomly allocated to diets containing different levels of proteins and each pen contained 13 chicks each. The diets were fed to the chicks at ad lib and the amount given increased with the increase in the growth of the chickens. Water was also provided at ad lib. The collected data were analyzed using mixed model of SAS 2010. Significance was declared at P<0.05 and means were separated using PDFF option of SAS software. In addition, SPSS software was used to compare the means. The results from the study have shown that there was an increase (P<0.05) in live weight in the chickens fed 180g/kg CP compared to those fed 170 and 190g/kg CP. laying percentage was high in chicken fed 18g/kg CP and Egg weight with increasing from 35.93-43.18 with decrease in protein levels (P<0.05). The diet that contained 17g/kg had the highest egg weight compared to the other two diets.

Keywords: egg weight, growth rate, laying percentage, rations, weight at laying

Introduction

In Malawi, just like any other country, nutrition remains one of the challenges that indigenous chickens experience under smallholder management system. The birds are dependent on scavenging feed resources which is inadequate and chickens sometimes are supplemented with maize bran and left over’s depending on the availability. This results in low productivity in indigenous chickens. Indigenous chickens play important role in socio-economic status of rural people in developing countries.1 Nearly all rural and peri urban families in Malawi keep small flock of free range chickens. The wide distributions of IC among household indigenous chickens make greatest contribution to household food security and therefore provide most of the protein in villages in form of eggs and meat. Small land and low capital requirement makes the chickens appropriate for resource poor farmers and their communities.2 Nutritional requirements of chickens are influenced by genotype and body size. The provision of supplemental feed in scavenging chicken production has direct influence on productivity of scavenging indigenous chickens, but little information is available on the strategies to be used to supplement scavenging chickens.3 In Malawi, nutrition remains one of the challenges that indigenous chickens experience under smallholder management system. The birds depend on scavenging feed resources and occasional supplementation with kitchen leftovers, cereal bran and small amounts of cereal grains which do not provide the required nutrients for normal activities and growth. However, little has been done to find out the nutrition requirements of the indigenous chickens in Malawi. Therefore, the current study aims at determining the optimal crude protein that can improve the performance of the IC in terms of growth and egg production.

Materials and methods

Study area

The experiment was conducted at Students farm, Bunda campus of the Lilongwe University of Agriculture and Natural Resources (LUANAR). Thirty nine chicks were used in this study. The chicks were grouped into 3 groups of 13 chicks each.

Experimental design

Repeated measure design where 7 day old chickens weighing 590±73g were randomly allocated to diets containing different levels of proteins. The diets were fed to the chicks at ad lib and the amount given increased with the increase in the growth of the chickens. Water was also provided at ad lib (Table 1).

Weeks

Diet

Amount/Pen(kg)

0-6

Chick Mash 20% CP

1

10-Jun

Growers Mash (17, 18&19% CP)

1

14-Oct

Growers Mash

1.5

14-17

Growers Mash

2

17-20

Growers Mash

3

Table 1 Feeding regime.

Composition of experimental rations

The ration was formulated using Pearson square method and using ration formulation and feed guides according to4 (Table 2).

D i e t   1   =   17 %   C P ;   D i e t   2   =   18 %   C P   a n d   D i e t   3 =   19 %   C P MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qacaWGebGaamyAaiaadwgacaWG0bGaaeiiaiaaigdacaqGGaGa eyypa0JaaeiiaiaaigdacaaI3aGaaiyjaiaabccacaWGdbGaamiuai aacUdacaqGGaGaamiraiaadMgacaWGLbGaamiDaiaabccacaaIYaGa aeiiaiabg2da9iaabccacaaIXaGaaGioaiaacwcacaqGGaGaam4qai aadcfacaqGGaGaamyyaiaad6gacaWGKbGaaeiiaiaadseacaWGPbGa amyzaiaadshacaqGGaGaaG4maiabg2da9iaabccacaaIXaGaaGyoai aacwcacaqGGaGaam4qaiaadcfaaaa@5E6C@

Ingredients (KG)

Diet 1

Diet 2

Diet 3

Maize

51.21

49.18

47.16

Maize bran

20.92

20.09

19.26

Soy bean

21.09

23.63

26.16

Fish meal

2.64

2.95

3.27

Salt

0.3

0.3

0.3

Premix

0.3

0.3

0.3

MCP

1.5

1.5

1.5

Lime

2

2

2

DL Methionine

0.05

0.05

0.05

Total

100

100

100

Table 2 Composition of experimental diets.

Data collection and analysis

The data which were collected include weekly live weight, weight at laying, number of egg laid per pen and weight of the eggs. The collected data was analyzed using mixed model of SAS 2010 software. Significance was declared at P<0.05 and means were separated using PDFF option of SAS software. In addition, SPSS software was used to compare the means.

Statistical model

Y i j t = μ + α i + d j ( i ) + γ t + ( y a ) i t + E i j t MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVCI8FfYJH8YrFfeuY=Hhbbf9v8qqaqFr0xc9pk0xbb a9q8WqFfeaY=biLkVcLq=JHqpepeea0=as0Fb9pgeaYRXxe9vr0=vr 0=vqpWqaaeaabiGaciaacaqabeaadaqaaqaaaOqaaKqzGeGaamywaS WaaSbaaeaajugWaiaadMgacaWGQbGaamiDaaWcbeaajugibiabg2da 9iabeY7aTjabgUcaRiabeg7aHTWaaSbaaKqbagaajugWaiaadMgaaK qbagqaaiabgUcaRKqzGeGaamizaSWaaSbaaKqbagaajugWaiaadQga caGGOaGaaiyAaiaacMcaaKqbagqaaKqzGeGaey4kaSIaeq4SdC2cda WgaaqaaKqzadGaamiDaaWcbeaajugibiabgUcaRiaacIcacaGG5bGa aiyyaiaacMcalmaaBaaajuaGbaqcLbmacaWGPbGaamiDaaqcfayaba qcLbsacqGHRaWkcaWGfbqcfa4aaSbaaSqaaKqzGeGaamyAaKqzadGa amOAaiaadshaaSqabaaaaa@62DA@

Where

y i j t MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVCI8FfYJH8YrFfeuY=Hhbbf9v8qqaqFr0xc9pk0xbb a9q8WqFfeaY=biLkVcLq=JHqpepeea0=as0Fb9pgeaYRXxe9vr0=vr 0=vqpWqaaeaabiGaciaacaqabeaadaqaaqaaaOqaaKqzGeaeaaaaaa aaa8qacaWG5bWcpaWaaSbaaeaajugWa8qacaWGPbGaamOAaiaadsha aSWdaeqaaaaa@3C01@ = live body weight measured at time the jth chickens assigned to the ith diet,

μ MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVCI8FfYJH8YrFfeuY=Hhbbf9v8qqaqFr0xc9pk0xbb a9q8WqFfeaY=biLkVcLq=JHqpepeea0=as0Fb9pgeaYRXxe9vr0=vr 0=vqpWqaaeaabiGaciaacaqabeaadaqaaqaaaOqaaKqzGeGaeqiVd0 gaaa@3830@ = the overall mean effect,

α i MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVCI8FfYJH8YrFfeuY=Hhbbf9v8qqaqFr0xc9pk0xbb a9q8WqFfeaY=biLkVcLq=JHqpepeea0=as0Fb9pgeaYRXxe9vr0=vr 0=vqpWqaaeaabiGaciaacaqabeaadaqaaqaaaOqaceaa89FcLbsacq aHXoqylmaaBaaajuaybiqaaiJajugWaiaadMgaaKqbGfqaaaaa@3CF2@ = the ith fixed diet effect,

  d j ( i ) MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qacaGGGcGaamiza8aadaWgaaqaaKqbG8qacaWGQbqcfa4damaa bmaajuaibaWdbiaadMgaa8aacaGLOaGaayzkaaaajuaGbeaaaaa@3DFD@ =the random effect of the jth chickens within the ith diet,

γ t MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVCI8FfYJH8YrFfeuY=Hhbbf9v8qqaqFr0xc9pk0xbb a9q8WqFfeaY=biLkVcLq=JHqpepeea0=as0Fb9pgeaYRXxe9vr0=vr 0=vqpWqaaeaabiGaciaacaqabeaadaqaaqaaaOqaceaa89FcLbsacq aHZoWzlmaaBaaajuaGbiqaaOecjugWaiaadshaaKqbagqaaaaa@3D63@ = the fixed tth time effect when the measurement was taken,

( γ α ) i t MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVCI8FfYJH8YrFfeuY=Hhbbf9v8qqaqFr0xc9pk0xbb a9q8WqFfeaY=biLkVcLq=JHqpepeea0=as0Fb9pgeaYRXxe9vr0=vr 0=vqpWqaaeaabiGaciaacaqabeaadaqaaqaaaOqaceaa89FcLbsaca GGOaGaeq4SdCMaeqySdeMaaiykaKqbaoaaBaaabaqcLbmacaWGPbGa amiDaaqcfayabaaaaa@40E9@ = the fixed interaction effect between diet and time,

  E i j t MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qacaGGGcGaamyra8aadaWgaaqcfasaa8qacaWGPbGaamOAaiaa dshaa8aabeaaaaa@3BE5@ = the random error

Results

Growth performance of the indigenous chickens

Table 3 shows significant differences in mean live weight among different rations (P<0.05). Thus live weight was affected (P< 0.05) by the rations (Table 3).

Effect

P Value

Diet

0.0901

Week* Diet

<.0001

Initial Weight

0.0061

Table 3 Fixed model effect.

Table 4 showed that chickens that were fed the diet containing 180g/kg DM gained more weight compared to those fed 170g/kg DM and 190g/kg from 8-10 week. The diet of 180g/kg DM resulted in superior weights at week 8 and week 10 because the ration contained (%) Crude protein which is the required CP for growth and maintenance. Since there was no further improvement in growth rate beyond 180g/kg DM, it can be concluded that that 190g/kg DM was above the requirement for this group of chickens (Table 4).

CP, g/kg DM

Time

Week8

Week 9

Week 10

Week 11

Week 12

Week 13

Point of lay

SEM

170

615.65

744.15a

849.65a

931.48

964.98

985.81a

1020.48

27.52

180

673.93

870.26b

964.93b

1018.59

1049.93

1092.59ab

1107.93

39.33

190

687.39

800.89a

893.56a

959.06

1002.06

1033.56b

1050.89

27.74

Table 4 Least square means of interaction between level of protein in the diet and time of pullets of Malawi indigenous chickens.

SEM= Standard error of the mean

abMeans with different superscripts along the column are significantly different (P<0.05)

Laying performance of the indigenous chicken

There was a relationship between laying percentage and weight (Table 5). The chicken fed 17g/kg CP laid few eggs but the weights were high (P<0.05) compared to the other diets. abMeans with different superscripts are significantly different (P<0.05)

Treatment (g/kg CP Feed on DM)

-

-

-

170

-

Weight at laying (g)

-

1020.48b

1107.93a

1050.89b

-

Laying %

-

78.57b

-

107.14a

85.71b

Egg weight (g)

43.18a

35.93b

-

36.33b

-

Table 5 Influence of protein level on laying and egg weight.

Discussion

According to Bikker P5 feeding indigenous chickens above the protein requirements does not result in an increase in protein deposition, but nitrogen excretion through the urine which increases rapidly. The chickens that fed 170g/kg DM also met the requirement of the chicken but the weight gain was low as compared to 180g/kg. Similarly, Mbajiorgu et al. found that during a 7-13 weeks growth stage, South African Venda chickens fed diets containing 18-22% CP grew faster than those offered a diet of 16-17% CP. Egg production, expressed as laying percentage was 78.57-107.14%. This was similar (P>0.05) between chickens fed diet 1 and 3 but higher (P<0.05) for those on diet 2. Egg weight increased (P<0.05) between diets 1 and 3. Diets 2 and 3 had similar egg weights (P>0.05) 35.93g and 36.33g respectively but different egg production (P<0.05). Laying percentage was lowest (78.57%) for diet 1 compared to the other two diets. Weight at laying was similar between chickens on diet 1 and 3 (P >0.05). Chicken on diet 2 had highest weight at the start of laying. The results showed that weight at laying of the chickens were similar to those offered diet 1 and 3 this is an indication that all the rations met the requirement for maintenance of the chickens. Diet 1 and 3 were not significantly different at P>0.05 confidence interval. The chicken on diet 2 registered high laying percent compared to the rest. This could have been due to the difference in the number of the hens in the pens. The mortality rate was higher during the first week, resulting in an imbalance between the females in the pens. Diet 1 had lowest laying percentage but the ration had an impact on the egg weight. The results agree with 9 NRC (1984) reports that the amino acid concentration of typical maize-soya diets (16 and 18% CP) meets the requirements of growing layer chickens.6 The drop in live weight at the starting of laying point of the chickens could be attributed to more nutrients being diverted from growth to egg production. The study by Tuitoek JK7 found that altering dietary protein concentrations between 10-14% CP affected egg weight while Cho YM8 reported no increase in egg weight in commercial layers offered diets with protein between 15% and 19.5% CP. Gous RM9 reported that the effect of altering the dietary amino acid concentrations was more severe on egg production than on egg weight.

Conclusion

The study has shown that the diet 2 which contained 18% CP had impact on the weight gain of the indigenous chickens (P<0.05) and also diet 1 with 17%CP had an effect (P< 0.05). Diet 2 should be fed to the chickens up to the point of laying whereas diet 1, should be used during the laying period for increased egg weight and size. This information will be useful in the formulation of indigenous layer chicken diets with the appropriate protein content.

Acknowledgements

This study was in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Bachelor of Science in Animal Science and the author would like to express deep and profound gratitude to Mr G Chingala and Mr J Tanganyika, the project supervisors, Professor JP Mtimuni and Mr D Chiumia the research project coordinators for their high profile assistance throughout the course of the project.

Conflict of interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Alders R. Poultry for profit and pleasure. Italy: FAO Diversification; 2004.
  2. Lwesya HJ. Management intervention measures for indigenous chicken in smallholder farming system in lilongwe west rural development project. Malawi: University of Malawi; 2003.
  3. Okitoi LO, Kabuage LW, Muinga RW, et al. The performance response of scavenging chickens to nutrient intake from scavenge able resources and from supplementation with energy and protein. Livestock Research for Rural Development. 2009;21(10):1–9.
  4. Mtimuni JP. Ration Formulation and Feed Guide. 2nd ed. Malawi: Blantyre printing and publishing Company Limited; 2011.
  5. Bikker P, Verstegen MWA, Tamminga S. Partitioning of dietary nitrogen between body components and waste in young pigs. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science. 1994;42:37–45.
  6. NRC. Nutrient requirements of poultry. 9th ed. USA: National Academy Press; 1994. p. 61–79.
  7. Kingori AM, Tuitoek JK, Muiruri HK, et al. Protein requirement of growing indigenous chicken during the 14–21 week growing period. South African Journal of Animal Science. 2003;33(2):78–82.
  8. Cho YM, Shin IS, Yang CJ. Effects of feeding dried leftover food on productivity of laying hens. AJAS. 2017;17:518–522.
  9. Gous RM, Kleyn FJ. Responses by laying hens to energy and amino acids. In: Cole DJA, Heresign W, editors. Recent Developments in Poultry Nutrition. 1989.
Creative Commons Attribution License

©2017 Kalinda, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.