Submit manuscript...
eISSN: 2576-4462

Horticulture International Journal

Research Article Volume 2 Issue 6

Pre-sowing treatment effects on gutgutiya (Protium serratum)- a threatened tree sspecies of Bangladesh

GN Tanjina Hasnat,1 Mohammed Kamal Hossain2

1Department of Land Administration, Patuakhali Science and Technology University, Bangladesh
2Institute of Forestry and Environmental Sciences, University of Chittagong, Bangladesh

Correspondence: Tanjina Hasnat, Department of Land Administration, Patuakhali Science and Technology University, Dumki, Patuakhali-8602, Bangladesh, Tel 8801783-736689

Received: September 11, 2018 | Published: December 5, 2018

Citation: Hasnat GNT, Hossain MK. Pre-sowing treatment effects on gutgutiya ( protium serratum )- a threatened tree species of Bangladesh. Horticult Int J. 2018;2(6):352-356. DOI: 10.15406/hij.2018.02.00076

Download PDF

Abstract

Gutgutiya (Protium serratum) is a native threatened multipurpose tree species of hill forests of Bangladesh. Fruits of this species are edible and contain high medicinal value. This species is naturally propagated by seeds. Natural germination percentage and final survivability in natural condition of this species is low. Pre-sowing treatment effects on seeds of P. serratum was studied to find out the best pre-sowing method for this hard coated seeds for restoration of degraded and deforested land. Randomized completely block design was applied and randomly selected seeds were treated with nine different pre-sowing treatments. Seeds were sown in normal polybags with 3:1 soil and cowdung media, and propagator house with Sylhet sand media. Highest germination percentage (30%), plant percent (30%) and germination value (0.4) found in seeds sowing without any pre-sowing treatment followed by 10% H2SO4 treatment for 3 minutes and 10% HCl treatment for 3 minutes. Germination energy was highest (6.7%) in boiled water but other germination performances and seedling growth performances were lowest. No germination observed in propagator house. Shoot height (28.8 cm), leaf number (16), leaf size (12.7 cm×4.7 cm) and collar diameter (12 mm) were maximum in seedlings germinated by 10% HCl treatment for 3 minutes followed by 10% H2SO4 treatment for 3 minutes and 10% H2SO4 treatment for 1 minute. The result of the study revealed that with increasing of immersion time in acid increases germination and seedling growth performances. The findings of this paper recommend 10% HCl for 3 minutes and 10% H2SO4 for 3 minutes for better performances in germination and seedling growth. This paper also recommend here for further researches on different concentration of HCl and H2SO4 for different time period on this valuable species.

Keywords: Protium serratum, native tree species, pre-sowing method, germination, seedling growth

Introduction

Land is the most essential part of the world but is degrading day by day due to rapid deforestation and use of forest land into other land uses. Restoration of these degraded lands with ecologically and economically potential and naturally threatened tree species could save both the species and the land. Gutgutiya (Protium serratum Wall. ex Colebr.) belongs to the family Burseraceae1,2 is an evergreen perennial tree with a large, spreading crown.3 It is a native rare tree species in Bangladesh and found in deciduous and semi-evergreen forests of the hill tracts in Bangladesh.4,5 The plant also distributed throughout India, Laos, Thailand, Vietnam, Andaman Island, Myanmar, Pakistan, China, and Cambodia.6 The synonym of the tree is Bursera serrata and in Bengali it is known as Gutgutiya. It is a medium to large sized tree can grow up to 30 m tall3 and diameter from 100 to 250 cm. This tree usually grows along the stream side.7 Bole is short3 and mostly clear for 9 to 15 m. Leaves are compound and leaf blade shape varies from oblong, oblong-lanceolate to acuminate. Flowers borne in densely velvety panicles in leaf axils. Flowers are bisexual, light green in color and carried on 2 mm long stalks. Fruit drupe type and nearly ovoid to round shaped. Fruits are yellowish green in young and bright pink when mature.5 Each fruit contains 1-3 seeds.3 P. serratum is a multipurpose tree species and different parts of the tree is widely used throughout the world as food, medicine and wood. This plant and plant parts is important for its potentiality of curing different diseases and allelopathic activity.8Mature fruit flesh is juicy, edible and sometimes used in manufacturing incense and perfumes. The fruits are used in the treatment of mouth ulcers.3 The fruits also possess good antioxidant and extracts of fruits may effectively prevent DNA nicking.9 Oral ingestion of leaf extract of P. serratum is a highly effective treatment against gastrointestinal disease and stomach ulcer.10 Leaf extract of the tree is also a good antibacterial agent in food packaging and preservation.11 The extract from leaves have remarkable anti-arthritic and thrombolytic effect too.12

Paste of barks is applied as folk medicine on boils and scabies.13 Like other members of Burseraceae P. serratum produce aromatic resins or gums.4 Extracts of the stem bark also have antimicrobial and cytotoxic activity.14 The species showed anti-inflammatory,15 anti-tumor16and agglutinating and immobilizing activities.17 The plants also have strong antimicrobial agents.18,10 Different parts of the P. serratum plant including leaves, roots, fruits, and seeds have potential antioxidant,11 anti-inflammatory,15 larvicidal and other medicinal properties.19

The plants also possess anti-tumor activities16 and immobilizing activities.17 It also has been evaluated the anti-arthritic activities of the plant.12 The plant extracts has an effect on the breast cancer cells.20 The wood of P. serratum is well textured, hard and excellent for making furniture21,house posts and boards.7,3 The wood also used for purposes of millwork, veneer and plywood, general construction, particleboards and such others.22 The tree generally harvested by local or ethnic people from the forests for its value as a fruit, preparation of folk medicine and source of wood. This ecologically important and valuable multipurpose tree is becoming rare in Bangladesh day by day. Naturally P. serratum is propagated by seeds and regeneration in natural forests is poor. The aim of the present study was to find out the germination behavior and initial seedling growth performance of P. serratum in nursery stage for massive plantation to protect this valuable species from extinct and to restoration of degraded land as a part of ecological restoration.

Methodology

Seed collection, handling, processing and study site preparation

Seeds of P. serratum were collected from Kaptai, Chittagong Hill Tracts South Forest Division, Bangladesh during September 2012. Phenotypic characteristics of fruits and seeds were then measured in the Seed Research Laboratory of Institute of Forestry and Environmental Sciences, Chittagong University (IFESCU). Fruits which randomly selected for experiment were average ranges from sizes of 1.6-1.8 cm×1.4-1.7 cm. About 250-400 fruits and 2800-2900 seeds were measured per kg respectively. After measurement, seeds were extracted manually from fruits and drying in the open sun for sowing in polybags and propagator house. Damaged, decayed and insect attacked seeds were avoided at the time of sowing. The media of the polybags was prepared with topsoil collected from forest floor, and cow-dung in the ratio of 3:1, and the media used in propagator house1 was with fine Sylhet sand.2

 Experimental design

Nine treatments with three replications for each and 20 seeds in each replication were set in the experiment. For justification of seed germination behavior and seedling growth performances of the treated seeds in eight plots with pre-sowing treatments and a sample plot was designed with non-treated seeds called control. Total experimental design was randomized completely block design. The pre-treatment methods were as follows:

T0: Seeds with no treatment and sown in polybags only (Control)

T1: Seeds treated with sand paper at the distal end

T2: Seeds soaking in water at 24oC for 24 hours

T3: Seeds soaking in hot water for 1 minute

T4: Seeds immersed in 10% H2SO4 for 1 minute

T5: Seeds immersed in 10% H2SO4 for 3 minutes

T6: Seeds immersed in 10% HCl for 1 minute

T7: Seeds immersed in 10% HCl for 3 minutes

T8: Seeds sown in propagator house

In sand paper treatment (T1) seeds were manually rubbed with sand paper at the distal end. Seeds were put into a beaker and soaked for 24 hours at room temperature (24oC) in cold water treatment (T2). In hot water treatment (T3) seeds were put into a beaker and soaked in boiled water (immediately after reaching boiling point) for 1 minute. In acid treatments (T4, T5, T6 and T7), randomly selected seeds were put into four separate beakers and immersed in 10% concentrated H2SO4 and HCl separately and left for 1 and 3 minutes respectively for both acids. After immersion, the solution was drained off and repeatedly rinsed with running tap water. Seeds in control and pre-sowing treatments from T1-T7 were sown in polybags, whereas T8 was conducted in propagator house at comparatively higher temperature (35°C temperature), humidity and in controlled environment.

 Data collection and analyze

Germination behaviors were recorded in daily basis at the date of seed sowing and continued up to six months. Germination percentage measured by counting seeds germinated daily out of 100.23 Cumulative germination percent measured at the end of total seed germination by summed up daily germination. The germination energy assessed by calculating daily germination percentage of its peak time.24 Survival percentages was determined by counting total seedlings survived at the end of the experiment. Germination value was found after multiplying peak value of germination (PV) and mean daily germination (MDG).

The following formulas were used to find out germination percentage, cumulative germination percentage, rate of germination, plant percent and plant value:

Germination % = MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qacaWGhbGaamyzaiaadkhacaWGTbGaamyAaiaad6gacaWGHbGa amiDaiaadMgacaWGVbGaamOBaiaabccacaGGLaGaaeiiaiabg2da9a aa@43CD@ Numberofseedsgerminated Numberofseedssown ×100 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qadaWcaaWdaeaapeGaamOtaiaadwhacaWGTbGaamOyaiaadwga caWGYbGaam4BaiaadAgacaWGZbGaamyzaiaadwgacaWGKbGaam4Cai aadEgacaWGLbGaamOCaiaad2gacaWGPbGaamOBaiaadggacaWG0bGa amyzaiaadsgaa8aabaWdbiaad6eacaWG1bGaamyBaiaadkgacaWGLb GaamOCaiaad+gacaWGMbGaam4CaiaadwgacaWGLbGaamizaiaadoha caWGZbGaam4BaiaadEhacaWGUbaaaiabgEna0kaaigdacaaIWaGaaG imaaaa@608B@

Cumulative germination % = MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qacaWGdbGaamyDaiaad2gacaWG1bGaamiBaiaadggacaWG0bGa amyAaiaadAhacaWGLbGaaeiiaiaadEgacaWGLbGaamOCaiaad2gaca WGPbGaamOBaiaadggacaWG0bGaamyAaiaad+gacaWGUbGaaeiiaiaa cwcacaqGGaGaeyypa0daaa@4DE1@   Cumulativenumberofseedsgerminated Numberofseedssown ×100v  MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qacaGGGcWaaSaaa8aabaWdbiaadoeacaWG1bGaamyBaiaadwha caWGSbGaamyyaiaadshacaWGPbGaamODaiaadwgacaWGUbGaamyDai aad2gacaWGIbGaamyzaiaadkhacaWGVbGaamOzaiaadohacaWGLbGa amyzaiaadsgacaWGZbGaam4zaiaadwgacaWGYbGaamyBaiaadMgaca WGUbGaamyyaiaadshacaWGLbGaamizaaWdaeaapeGaamOtaiaadwha caWGTbGaamOyaiaadwgacaWGYbGaam4BaiaadAgacaWGZbGaamyzai aadwgacaWGKbGaam4CaiaadohacaWGVbGaam4Daiaad6gaaaGaey41 aqRaaGymaiaaicdacaaIWaGaamODaiaacckaaaa@6D3F@

Germination rate % MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qacaWGhbGaamyzaiaadkhacaWGTbGaamyAaiaad6gacaWGHbGa amiDaiaadMgacaWGVbGaamOBaiaabccacaWGYbGaamyyaiaadshaca WGLbGaaeiiaiaacwcaaaa@4687@ = Numberofseedsgerminated Numberofday ×100 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qadaWcaaWdaeaapeGaamOtaiaadwhacaWGTbGaamOyaiaadwga caWGYbGaam4BaiaadAgacaWGZbGaamyzaiaadwgacaWGKbGaam4Cai aadEgacaWGLbGaamOCaiaad2gacaWGPbGaamOBaiaadggacaWG0bGa amyzaiaadsgaa8aabaWdbiaad6eacaWG1bGaamyBaiaadkgacaWGLb GaamOCaiaad+gacaWGMbGaamizaiaadggacaWG5baaaiabgEna0kaa igdacaaIWaGaaGimaaaa@5AD1@

Plant % = MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qacaWGqbGaamiBaiaadggacaWGUbGaamiDaiaabccacaGGLaGa aeiiaiabg2da9aaa@3E31@ Numberofsurvivingseedlings Numberofseedssown ×100 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qadaWcaaWdaeaapeGaamOtaiaadwhacaWGTbGaamOyaiaadwga caWGYbGaam4BaiaadAgacaWGZbGaamyDaiaadkhacaWG2bGaamyAai aadAhacaWGPbGaamOBaiaadEgacaWGZbGaamyzaiaadwgacaWGKbGa amiBaiaadMgacaWGUbGaam4zaiaadohaa8aabaWdbiaad6eacaWG1b GaamyBaiaadkgacaWGLbGaamOCaiaad+gacaWGMbGaam4Caiaadwga caWGLbGaamizaiaadohacaWGZbGaam4BaiaadEhacaWGUbaaaiabgE na0kaaigdacaaIWaGaaGimaaaa@6392@

Germination value = MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcLbsaqaaaaa aaaaWdbiaadEeacaWGLbGaamOCaiGac2gacaGGPbGaaiOBaiaadgga caWG0bGaamyAaiaad+gacaWGUbGaaiiOaiaadAhacaWGHbGaamiBai aadwhacaWGLbGaaiiOaiabg2da9aaa@48DD@ Peakvalueofgermination( PV )×Meandailygermination( MDG ) MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcLbsaqaaaaa aaaaWdbiaadcfacaWGLbGaamyyaiaadUgacaWG2bGaamyyaiaadYga caWG1bGaamyzaiaad+gacaWGMbGaam4zaiaadwgacaWGYbGaciyBai aacMgacaGGUbGaamyyaiaadshacaWGPbGaam4Baiaad6gajuaGdaqa daGcpaqaaKqzGeWdbiaadcfacaWGwbaakiaawIcacaGLPaaajugibi abgEna0kaad2eacaWGLbGaamyyaiaad6gacaWGKbGaamyyaiaadMga caWGSbGaamyEaiaadEgacaWGLbGaamOCaiGac2gacaGGPbGaaiOBai aadggacaWG0bGaamyAaiaad+gacaWGUbqcfa4aaeWaaOWdaeaajugi b8qacaWGnbGaamiraiaadEeaaOGaayjkaiaawMcaaaaa@6A26@

Germination capacity is the percentage of seeds in a sample that actually germinate irrespective of time. The germination capacity was categorized by Kumar 199923 as - i) 100-90%- very good, ii) 90-70%–good, iii) 70-50%–average, iv) 50-30%-poor, v) 30-20%-very poor, and vi) (<) 10% - extremely poor.

The experiment was conducted in the natural atmospheric condition. Regular weeding and watering twice daily were maintained. Only in treatment T8, temperature and humidity was controlled relatively high and stayed apart from rainfall. Daily sprinkling at two times was provided for required water and moisture. Seedlings growth behavior was measured at two different stages –five months and seven months for finding out growth increment rate among different treatments. Shoot height, leaf number, leaf length and width were measured when seedlings were five months old. Collar diameter was measured at seventh month when seedlings were ready for plantation. For counting leaf number total number of nodes including both leaf fall scar and leaf present was counted and average number was calculated. Shoot height, leaf length and leaf width were measured with centimeter scale while collar diameter was measured with vernier caliper.

1Propagator house: is a structure, primarily of glass, in which temperature and humidity can be controlled for the cultivation or protection of plants. Propagator house is one type of greenhouse with a bed consists of Sylhet sand with controlled temperature and humidity.

2Sylhet sand: River sand with higher proportion of silica found in Sylhet region, Bangladesh.

Results and discussion

Germination behaviors

Germination behaviors of P. serratum were differently affected by applying different pre-sowing treatments. Germination started at first (13th day) in seeds treated with 10% HCl acid solution for 1 minute and maximum days (90 days) was taken by those seeds treated with boiled water for 1 minute. At the end of study highest cumulative germination (30%), plant percent (30%) and germination value (0.4) were observed in seeds sown without any treatments. Germination energy was highest (6.7%) both in boiled water and HCl for 3 minutes treatments. Based on germination percentage, seed sown without any treatment showed comparatively better germination capacity while seeds sown after different treatments showed very poor and extremely poor germination capacity (Table 1).

Treatments

Germi-nation start at (day)

Germi-nation ended after

Cumu-lative germi-nation %

Germi-nation energy %

Germination energy period (week)

Plant percent %

Germi-nation value

Germi-nation capacity

T0(Control)

22th

178th

30c*

5a

8a

30c

0.4b

Poor

T1(Sand paper)

17th

155th

15b

5a

4a

15b

0.2a

Very poor

T2(Cold water, 24 hr.)

21th

148th

11.7ab

5a

9a

11.7ab

0.1a

Very poor

T3(Boiled water, 1min.)

90th

170th

5a

6.7b

13b

5a

0.0

Extremely poor

T4 (H2SO4, 1 min.)

21th

160th

23.3bc

5a

5a

23.3bc

0.12a

Very poor

T5 (H2SO4, 3 min.)

17th

155th

28.3c

5a

4a

28.3c

0.27ab

Very poor

T6 (HCl, 1 min.)

13th

126th

10a

5a

11b

10a

0.07a

Extremely poor

T7 (HCl, 3 min.)

15th

170th

25bc

6.7b

6a

25bc

0.29ab

Very poor

T8 (Propagator House)

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Table 1 Variation in germination behavior of P. serratum under different pre-sowing treatments

*Means followed by the same letter (s) are not significantly different at P<0.05, Duncan’s Multiple Range Test (DMRT).

Mean cumulative germination percentage

Mean cumulative germination percentage (MCG%) varied differently with different treatments and time. MCG% was found highest at early stage (16th day) in HCl (3 min) treatment. After one month it was highest in H2SO4 (3 min) treatment and remain constantly highest up to 93rd day followed by HCl treatment for 3 minutes. At the end of six months all curves showed significant distinction from their previous results that found at the end of three months. Maximum treatments showed a continuous progressive nature from 3rd to 6th month while a few showed rapid germination at this stage. Seeds sown in control revealed highest MCG% and most steep curve since 3rd to 6th month of seed sowing (Figure 1).

Figure 1 Mean cumulative germination percent of P. serratum under different treatments.

Seedling morphology

Highest shoot height (28.8 cm) observed in seedlings germinated after treating with 10% concentrated HCl acid for 3 minutes followed by 10% H2SO4 for 3 minutes (28.2 cm) and 10% H2SO4 for 1 minute (26 cm). Surprisingly, unlike other acid treatments 10% HCl for 1 minute revealed comparatively low (13.5 cm) height increment. Leaf number (16), leaf size (12.7 cm×4.7 cm) and collar diameter (12) were also maximum in seedlings germinated by 10% concentrated HCl acid treatment for 3 minutes (Table 2).

 

 

Treatments

Seedlings after germination

        Five months old

Seven months old

Shoot height (cm)

Leaf number

Leaf length (cm)

Leaf width (cm)

Collar diameter (mm)

T0 (Control)

14.8

12

10.4

3.8

9

T1 (Sand paper)

18.8

13

10.9

3.9

10

T2 (Cold water, 24 hr.)

11.3

8

10.8

4.5

8

T3 (Boiled water, 1min.)

2.6

3

5.8

2.6

5

T4 (H2SO4, 1 min.)

26

15

11.9

4.5

9.2

T5 (H2SO4, 3 min.)

28.2

16

12.1

4.5

9.4

T6 (HCl, 1 min.)

13.5

9

10.9

4.3

7.8

T7 (HCl, 3 min.)                

28.8

16

12.7

4.7

12

Table 2 Mean morphological growth of P. serratum seedlings in different treatments

Discussion

Hard coated seeds are sometimes impermeable to required nutrition for producing vigor seedlings. These seeds need proper pre-sowing treatments for producing potential seedlings for plantation and for restoration of land. Germination behaviors and seedling morphological behaviors of P. serratum were positively varied with different pre-sowing treatments. Soaking in proper concentrated acid sometimes enhances germination rate. Seeds soaked sufficiently in acid may boost germination rate in some hard-coated seeds.25–28 But, insufficient soaking may not effective enough. Moreover, concentration of acid and time of exposure are very critical and varies from species to species. In this study only one concentration (10% solution) and two time of exposures (1 and 3 minutes) to HCl and H2SO4 was used. Soaking seeds in HCl soften the hard coat of seeds and make the seed coat permeable to water, air and nutrition.26,29 After the pretreatment when seeds sown immediately sucked water and nutrient for producing vigor seedlings easily from the soil. Hot water treatment reveled poor performances both in germination and seedling growth. This may be because of damage of embryo due to extreme heat. Further researches could be conducted with hot water treatments of different heats.

Though cumulative germination behaviors were highest in seeds sown without any pre-sowing treatment followed by seeds treating with 10% concentrated H2SO4 for 3 minutes and 10% concentrated HCl for 3 minutes, but overall seedling growth performances were highest in seedlings obtained from seeds sown after treating with 10% HCl followed by 10% H2SO4 for 3 minutes and 10% H2SO4 for 1 minute. The study revealed that, seeds sown after application of acid treatments were more effective than any other pretreatment methods. In this result, it was also found that with increase of soaking time in both acids seed germination behaviors and seedling morphological growth behaviors increased positively. These findings will be helpful for conducting further researches.

Conclusion

The wild fruit tree species P. serratum has ecological value and allelopathic importance. Fruits of this species are quite familiar and eaten by people living in Chittagong Hill Tracts (CHT). But, this tree is becoming rare in its natural habitat gradually. Natural regeneration and survivability is in risk and restoration of land with this important native tree species is only possible by plantation. Commercial plantation with other fruit trees could save the species from becoming extinct. In natural habitat though the germination rate is quite similar to nursery but survivability due to predation and climatic hazard it is difficult to grow in a mature vigor tree. Hence, seedlings grow in nursery could be the only alternative for restoration. For raising vigor seedlings for plantation 10% concentrated HCl acid for 3 minutes and 10% H2SO4 for 3 minutes both are recommended. Further researches are recommended by applying different concentration of HCl and H2SO4 for different immersion periods.

Acknowledgements

None.

Conflict of interest

Authors declare that there is no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Swart JJ. A monograph of the genus Protium and some allied genera (Burseraceae) (Doctoral dissertation, Drukkerij koch en knuttel); 1942.
  2. Roskov Y, Kunze T, Orrell T, et al. Species 2000 & ITIS catalogue of life: 2014 annual checklist". Species 2000: Reading, UK; 2014.
  3. Gardner S, Sidisunthorn P, Anusarnsunthorn V. A field guide to forest trees of northern Thailand. Kobfai Publishing Project; 2000.
  4. Huq AM, Hasan H. Flora of Bangladesh (Burseraceae). Dhaka: Bangladesh Agricultural Research Council; 1987.
  5. Islam MR, Kabir MF, Alam R, et al. Sedative, membrane stability, cytotoxic and antioxidant properties of methanol extract of leaves of Protium serratum Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Disease. 2014;4:928–933.
  6. Hassler M. World Plants: Synonymic checklists of the vascular plants of the world (version Dec 2017). In: Roskov Y & Abucay L. editors. Species 2000 & ITIS Catalogue of Life; 2018.
  7. Woodcock HD, Coutts J. Lilies: Their culture and management. Country Life Limited, London; 1935.
  8. Fujii Y, Parvez SS, Parvez MM, et al. Screening of 239 medicinal plant species for allelopathic activity using the sandwich method. Weed Biol Manag. 2003;3(4):233–241.
  9. Prakash D, Upadhyay G, Gupta C. Total phenol and antioxidant activity of some fruits and their under-utilized parts. International Food Research Journal. 2013;20(4):1717.
  10. Panda SK, Mohanta YK, Padhi L, Park YH, Mohanta TK, Bae H. Large scale screening of ethnomedicinal plants for identification of potential antibacterial compounds. Molecules. 2016;21:1–20.
  11. Mohanta YK, Panda SK, Bastia AK, Mohanta TK. Biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles from Protium serratum and investigation of their potential impacts on food safety and control. Frontiers in microbiology. 2017;8:
  12. Sayeed MA, Rashid MMU, Kabir MF, Alam R, Islam MS, Dhar R, Yusuf AM. In vitro anti-arthritic and thrombolytic activities of methanolic extract of Protium serratum Journal of Medicinal Plants Research. 2014;8(16):615–618.
  13. Kandi B, Dhal NK, Mohanty RC. A case study on indigenous phytotherapy for skin diseases in Nuapada district, Odisha, India.  Int J Herb Med. 2013;1(2):117–123.
  14. Ara K, Rahman MS, Rahman AHMM, Hasan CM, Rashid MA. Terpenoids and Coumarin from Bursera serrata Dhaka Univ JPharm Sci2009;8(2):107–110.
  15. Carretero ME,  López - Pérez  JL,  Abad  MJ,  Bermejo  P,  Tillet  S,  Israel  A, Noguera      Preliminary   study   of   the   anti - inflammatory activity   of   hexan e   extract   and   fractions   from Bursera   simaruba (Linneo) Sarg. (Burseraceae) leaves.  J Ethnopharmacol. 2008;116:11–15.
  16. McDoniel PB, Cole JR. Antitumor    activity    of Bursera schlechtendalii (burseraceae):  isolation and structure determination of two new lignans.  J Pharm Sci. 1972;61:1992–1994.
  17. Huacuja RL, Delgado NM, Carranco LA, Reyes LR, Rosado GA. Agglutinating   and   immobilizing   activity   of   an   e thanol   extract   of Bursera fagaroides on human and other mammalian spermatozoa.  Arch Invest Med. 1990;21:393–398.
  18. Panda SK. Ethno-medicinal uses and screening of plants for antibacterial activity from similipal biosphere reserve. Odisha, India. J Ethnopharmacol. 2014;151:158–175.
  19. Tanamatayarat P. Antityrosinase, antioxidative activities, and brine shrimp lethality of ethanolic extracts from Protium searratum (Wall. ex Colebr.) Engl. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed. 2016;6:1050–1055.
  20. Chan LL, Gosangari SL, Watkin KL, Cunningham BT. A label-free photonic crystal biosensor imaging method for detection of cancer cell cytotoxicity and proliferation. Apoptosis. 2007;12(6):1061-1068.
  21. Sutton BC, Mehrotra MD. Colletogloeum protii sp. nov., a leaf spot pathogen of Protium serratum. Transactions of the British Mycological Society. 1982;78(1):188-190.
  22. Chudnoff M. Tropical Timbers of the World. USDA Forest Service, Ag. Handbook no. 607. USDA, Washington, DC, USA; 1984.
  23. Kumar V. Nursery and Plantation Practices in Forestry. Scientific Publishers, 5A, New Pali Road, P.O. Box 91, Jodhpur – 342001; 1999.
  24. Dwivedi AP. A Text Book of Silviculture. International Book Distributors. 9/3 Rajpur Road, Dehradun – 248001, India; 1993.
  25. Msanga HP. Seed Germination of Indigenous Trees in Tanzania, UBC Press, Vancouver, Canada; 2000.
  26. Azad MS, Biswas RK, Matin MA. Seed germination of Albizia procera (Roxb.) Benth in Bangladesh: a basis for seed source variation and pre-sowing treatment Forestry Studies in China. 2012;14(2):124–1130.
  27. Merou T, Takos I, Konstantinidou E, et al. Effect of different Pre-treatment methods on germination of Albizia julibrissin Seed Science and Technology. 2011;39(1):248–252.
  28. Azad MS, Zedan-Al-Musa M, Matin MA. Effects of pre-sowing treatments on seed germination of Melia azedarach. Journal of Forestry Research. 2010;21(2):193–196.
  29. Schmidt L. Dormancy and Pre-Treatment. Guide to Handling of Tropical and sub-Tropical Forest Seeds, Danida Forest Seed Centre, Humlebaek, Denmark; 2000.
Creative Commons Attribution License

©2018 Hasnat, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.