1. Home
  2. HIJ
  3. Allelopathyc potential of baccharis salicifolia against staphylococcus aureus
Submit manuscript...
eISSN: 2576-4462

Horticulture International Journal

Review Article Volume 2 Issue 5

Allelopathyc potential of baccharis salicifolia against staphylococcus aureus

Sandra Luz Cabrera Hilerio, Eduardo Javier Escalante Hern ndez, Mariana Miranda Ar mbula

Department of Biochemistry-Food, Autonomous University of Puebla, Mexico

Correspondence: Sandra Luz Cabrera-Hilerio, Faculty. of Chemical Sciences, Dept. of Biochemistry-Food, Benem

Received: September 02, 2017 | Published: October 5, 2018

Citation: Hilerio SLC, Hernández EJE, Arámbula MM. Allelopathyc potential of baccharis salicifolia against staphylococcus aureus. Horticult Int J. 2018;2(5):253-254. DOI: 10.15406/hij.2018.02.00060

Download PDF

Abstrat

Baccharis salicifoliais a species that has been shown to have significantbioactivities; several species of this genus are used in the popular medicine like diuretic, digestive and antifungal; however, there are few studies on the composition and active compounds of Baccharis. Allelopathic potential of ethanolic fractions of B. salicifolia was evaluated on antimicrobial activity against Staphylococcus aureus.The antibacterial activity of the B. salicifolia ethanolic extract on S. aureus was evaluated by the disc method and the bioguide fractionation by Thin Layer Chromatography (CCF) and Chromatography in Column (CC). The results showed that inhibition exists in the various fractions of the ethanolic extract (between 50-80% respectively) with respect to the positive control; The fractionation by CCF and with CC, allowed to evaluate 10 ethanolic fractions which possess the metabolites responsible for the antibacterial activity on S. aureus.

Keywords: antibacterial activity, Baccharis salicifolia, ethanolic extract, Staphylococcus aureus.

Introduction

Allelopathic plants are known to produce compounds that may influence stimulating or inhibiting different biological processes of other organisms.1 It has been suggested that allelopathy is an important factor in regulating the structure of plant communities and the speed of growth of plants in the field.2 This allelopathic function has been attributed to several flavonoids, phenolic and terpenoid structures.3 The allelopathic potential of plants can be used as a bactericide, fungicide, herbicide, insecticide, among others; and one of the applications that have taken relevance in recent years is the use of compounds from these plants for the control of foodborne diseases.4 A large variety of microorganisms can lead to food spoilage including Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella sp, Bacillus cereus and Staphylococcus aureus.5,6 Some plant species with allelopathic properties have shown, through different extracts, activity against enteropathogenic organisms. Some plant extracts prove to be an alternative for the control of pathogenic bacteria with resistance to conventional drugs.7

Baccharis salicifolia L. is a member of the Asteraceae family and has several species that have already been reported in the treatment of some human diseases in traditional medicine.8 Studies accomplished on the chemical composition of different species of the genus, shown the presence of numerous secondary metabolites such as diterpenoids and flavonoids.9 In the present work, the fractions of the ethanolic extract of Baccharis salicifolia were evaluated for allelopathic potential and its effect against S. aureus microorganism. Chromatographic fractions were obtained from conventional methods of separation of chemical compounds such as thin layer chromatography (TLC) and column chromatography (CC).

Methodology

The extract was obtained from 10 g of dry and ground B. salicifolia leaves with 125ml ethanol in a soxhlet apparatus for 5 h. Subsequently it was evaporated to dryness using a vacuum rotary evaporator and the sample was stored in amber flasks at -20°C. The ethanolic extract was fractionated by column chromatography (CC) with 35-70 mesh silica gel (210.7560g), on a 2.5×10cm column. The solvent system used was of ascending polarity: chloroform, ethyl acetate and acetone, (1:1:1). The total of fractions collected were 10 which were enumerated from 1 to 10. Obtained fractions were stored at low temperatures.10

Evaluation of antibacterial activity

Bacterial strain Staphylococcus aureus (strain 921) isolated was obtained from the collection of the Microbiology Department of the Chemical Sciences Faculty of Universidad Autonoma de Puebla (BUAP), Mexico. Antibacterial activity of the fractions was evaluated using the disc method, for which the strain was inoculated at a concentration of 1.5x108cells/mL, corresponding to tube 0.5 of McFarland Nephelometer. Mueller Hinton agar plates were placed on Whatman#3 filter paper with 20μL of each fraction, using Vancomycin as positive control and two negative controls, sterile water and solvent. Plates were incubated at 37°C for 24h, and size of the inhibition halos was measured after this time. To determine the inhibition percent, the was that applied by Martinez.11 At least three repetitions were run for each assay.

Results and discussion

The results of the biological activity of ethanolic extract fractions against S. aureus are reported in Figure 1, where it can be observed that the first four fractions (1, 2, 3, and 4) did not show inhibition activity on the microorganism at 24h. However, the following fractions (5 to 10) have antibacterial activity in the different percentages ranging from 52.5-85%. Fraction 10 showed the highest bioactivity of inhibition (85%) on the target organism, compared to the other fractions 5-9 and the control treatment (conventional chemical bactericide). This shows that the fractions with higher polarity present greater bactericidal activity, which indicates the presence of possible biologically active polar compounds of B. salicifolia against S. aureus microorganism. The results obtained are correlated with previous studies, which also demonstrate the antibacterial activity of B. salicifolia on Staphylococcus aureus.12 However, Carrizo et al.5 shows that oily extracts of B. salicifolia had activity on Staphylococcus aureus, Listeria monocytogenes and Bacillus cereus. This diverse activity in the extracts can be due to the diverse chemical compounds that have been found and analyzed in some species of the genus Baccharis like B. glutinosa, B. salicifolia and B. genistelloides, emphasizing the presence of flavonoids, terpenes and steroids, substances reductants, lactones and coumarins. The metabolites present in the genus Baccharis that have been attributed with various biological activities and properties are mainly flavonoids of the flavanone and flavone type; the kaurane nucleus diterpenes, cleorodans and labdano.13

Figure 1 Percentage inhibition of the antibacterial activity of the various ethanolic extract fractions of B. salicifolia against S. aureus at 24h.

In B. salicifolia at least five flavonoids have been isolated in organic extracts with methylene chloride.14 Analyzing the chromatographic profiles obtained in this work, we consider that these types of compounds are responsible for the antibacterial activity. According to our results, B. salicifolia possesses the potential to inhibit the growth of resistant microorganisms overcoming the effect of some conventional drugs.

Conclusion

Ethanolic fractions obtained from Baccharis salicifolia report antibacterial activity, finding that the fraction 10 was the one of greater growth inhibition activity against S. aureus, compared to the positive control treatment. These data demonstrate thatit would be interesting for future investigations the discovery of new allelopathic compounds with antibacterial potential.

Acknowledgements

None.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Farooq M, Jabran K, Cheema ZA, et al. The role of allelopathy in agricultural pest management. Pest Management Science. 2011;67(5):493‒506.
  2. Wardle DA, Nicholson KS, Rahman A. Use of a comparative approach to identify allelopathic potential and relationship between allelopathy bioassays and competition experiments for ten grassland and plant species. J Chem Ecol. 1996;22(5):933‒948.
  3. Withaker RH, Feeny PP. Allelochemics: Chemical interactions between species. Science. 1971;171(3973):757‒770.
  4. Jabran K, Mahajan G, Sardana V, et al. Allelopathy for weed control in agricultural systems. Crop Protection. 2015;72:57‒65.
  5. Carrizo FR, Ponzi M, Ardanaz C, et al. Chemical composition of essential oil of Baccharis salicifolia (Ruiz & Pavon) Pers. and antibacterial activity. J Chil Chem Soc. 2009;54(4):475‒476.
  6. Sauceda ENR. Uso de agentes antimicrobianos naturales en la conservación de frutas y hortalizas. Ra Ximhai. 2011;7(1):153‒170.
  7. Zamorano C. Alelopatía: un nuevo reto en la ciencia de las arvenses en el trópico. Agron, 2006;14(1):7‒15.
  8. Madeira FP. Flavonoides e Triterpenos de Baccharis pseudo tenuifolia–Bioactividades sobre Artemia salina. Quim Nova. 2003;26(3):309‒311.
  9. Gianello J, Giordano O. Examen químico en seis especies del género Baccharis. Rev. Lat. de Química. 1984;15:81‒86.
  10. Knowles JR, Roller S, Murray DB, et al. Antimicrobial action of carvacrol at different stages of dual-species biofilm development by Staphylococcus aureus and Salmonellaenterica serovarTyphimurium. Appl Environ Microbiol, 2005;71(2):797‒803.
  11. Martínez MJ. Ausencia de actividad antimicrobiana de un extracto acuoso liofilizado de Aloe vera(sábila). Rev Cubana Plant Med, 1996;1(3):18‒20.
  12. Bussmann RW, Ashley G, Sharon D, et al. Proving that traditional knowledge works the antibacterial activity of Northern Peruvian medicinal plants. Ethnobotany Research and Applications. 2011;9:67‒96.
  13. Verdi LG, Brighente IMC, Pizzolatti MG. Gênero Baccharis (Asteraceae): aspectos químicos, econômicos e biológicos. Quím Nova. 2005;28(1):85‒94.
  14. Domínguez LM. Comparación de la Actividad Herbicida de dos especies de la Familia Asteraceae. En Tesis. Facultad de Química, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. 2002; 96 p.
Creative Commons Attribution License

©2018 Hilerio, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.

Citations

Journal Menu

Useful Links