Research Article Volume 5 Issue 4
Discrete shanker distribution and its derived distributions
Munindra Borah, Junali Hazarika
Regret for the inconvenience: we are taking measures to prevent fraudulent form submissions by extractors and page crawlers. Please type the correct Captcha word to see email ID.
Department of Mathematical Sciences, Tezpur University, India
Correspondence: Junali Hazarika, Department of Mathematical Sciences, Tezpur University, Napaam, Tezpur, Assam, India
Received: January 26, 2017 | Published: April 7, 2017
Citation: Borah M, Hazarika J. Discrete shanker distribution and its derived distributions. Biom Biostat Int J. 2017;5(4):146-153. DOI: 10.15406/bbij.2017.05.00140
Download PDF
Introduction
One parameter continuous Shanker distribution introduced by Shanker (2015 b) with parameter is defined by its probability density function (pdf).
(1.1)
Discretization of continuous distribution
Discretization of continuous distribution can be done using different methodologies. In this paper we deal with the derivation of a new discrete distribution which takes values in
. This new distribution is generated by discretizing the continuous survival function of the Shanker distribution, which is may be obtained as
(2.1)
(2.2)
The probability mass function (pmf) of discrete Shanker distribution may be obtained as
(2.3)
Probability recurrence relation
Probability recurrence relation of discrete Shanker distribution may be obtained as
(2.5)
Where
, and
(2.6)
Factorial moment recurrence relation
Factorial moment generating function (fmgf) may be obtained as
=
(2.7)
The more general form of factorial moment may also be written as
(2.8)
Size- biased discrete shanker (SBDJ) distribution
If a random variable
have discrete Shanker distribution with parameter
then the pmf of the size-biased distribution may be derived as
,
(3.1)
Where
and
denote respectively pmf and the mean of discrete Shanker distribution.
The pmf
of size- biased discrete Shanker distribution with parameters
may be derived from (3.1) as
(3.2)
Recurrence relation of size- biased discrete shanker distribution
Probability generating function
for Size- biased Discrete Shanker Distribution may be obtained as
(3.3)
Probability recurrence relation for size- biased discrete shanker distribution
Probability recurrence relation of Size- biased Discrete Shanker Distribution distribution may be obtained as
for
(3.4)
where
and (3.5)
Factorial moment recurrence relation for size- biased discrete shanker distribution
Factorial moment generating function
of Size- biased discrete Shanker distribution may be obtained as
(3.6)
More general form
(3.7)
Factorial moment recurrence relation of Size- biased discrete Shanker distribution may be obtained as
(3.7)
Where
(3.8)
Method of estimation of shanker distribution
The parameter
of Shanker distribution has been estimated using Newton’s –Raphson method by considering appropriate initial guest value for
. The function of
can be expressed as
Fitting of discrete shanker distribution
Shanker et al.1 fitted Poisson distribution (PD), Poisson- Lindley distribution (PLD) and Poisson-Akash distribution (PAD) to eleven numbers of data sets covering ecology, genetics and thunderstorms. In this investigation discrete Shanker (DS) distribution has been fitted to all 11 data sets have been considered for a comparison (Tables 1-11).2-36
No. of yeast cell per square |
Observed |
Expected frequency |
frequency |
DS |
PD |
PLD |
PAD |
0 |
213 |
213 |
202.1 |
234 |
236.8 |
1 |
128 |
109.15 |
138 |
99.4 |
95.6 |
2 |
37 |
47.44 |
47.1 |
40.5 |
39.9 |
3 |
18 |
19 |
10.7 |
16 |
16.6 |
4 |
3 |
7.25 |
1.8 |
6.2 |
6.7 |
5 |
1 |
2.67 |
0.2 |
2.4 |
2.7 |
6 |
0 |
1.48 |
0.1 |
1.5 |
1.7 |
Total |
400 |
400 |
400 |
400 |
400 |
|
Estimated
|
1.1621 |
0.6825 |
1.950236 |
2.260342 |
|
7.89 |
10.08 |
11.04 |
14.68 |
d.f. |
3 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
p- vale |
0.0468 |
0.0065 |
0.004 |
0.0006 |
Table 1 Observed and expected number of Homocytometer yeast cell counts per square observed by Gosset
No. of yeast cell per square |
Observed |
Expected frequency |
frequency |
DS |
PD |
PLD |
PAD |
0 |
38 |
38 |
25.3 |
35.8 |
36.3 |
1 |
17 |
22.4 |
29.1 |
20.7 |
20.1 |
2 |
10 |
11.02 |
16.7 |
11.4 |
11.2 |
3 |
9 |
4.97 |
6.4 |
6 |
6.1 |
4 |
3 |
2.13 |
1.8 |
3.1 |
3.2 |
5 |
2 |
0.88 |
0.4 |
1.6 |
1.6 |
6 |
1 |
0.36 |
0.2 |
0.8 |
0.8 |
7 |
0 |
0.14 |
0.1 |
0.6 |
0.7 |
Total |
80 |
80 |
80 |
80 |
80 |
|
Estimated
|
1.0494 |
1.15 |
1.255891 |
1.620588 |
|
6.246 |
18.27 |
2.47 |
2.07 |
d.f. |
4 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
p- vale |
0.1815 |
0.0001 |
0.4807 |
0.558 |
Table 2 Observed and expected number of red mites on Apple leaves
No. of yeast cell per square |
Observed |
Expected frequency |
frequency |
DS |
PD |
PLD |
PAD |
0 |
188 |
187.98 |
169.4 |
194 |
196.3 |
1 |
83 |
85.03 |
109.8 |
79.5 |
76.5 |
2 |
36 |
33.03 |
35.6 |
31.3 |
30.8 |
3 |
14 |
11.88 |
7.8 |
12 |
12.4 |
4 |
2 |
4.07 |
1.2 |
4.5 |
4.9 |
5 |
1 |
1.99 |
0.2 |
2.7 |
3.1 |
Total |
324 |
324 |
324 |
324 |
324 |
|
Estimated
|
1.2644 |
0.648148 |
2.043252 |
2.345109 |
|
0.367 |
15.19 |
1.29 |
2.33 |
d.f. |
3 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
p- vale |
0.9470 |
0.0005 |
0.5247 |
0.3119 |
Table 3 Observed and expected number of European corn-border of McGuire et al
No. of yeast cell per square |
Observed |
Expected frequency |
frequency |
DS |
PD |
PLD |
PAD |
0 |
268 |
268 |
231.3 |
257 |
260.4 |
1 |
87 |
87 |
92.8 |
126.7 |
93.4 |
2 |
26 |
28.23 |
34.7 |
32.8 |
32.1 |
3 |
9 |
8.01 |
6.3 |
11.2 |
11.5 |
4 |
4 |
2.18 |
0.8 |
3.8 |
4.1 |
5 |
2 |
0.58 |
0.1 |
1.2 |
1.4 |
6 |
1 |
0.15 |
0.1 |
0.4 |
0.5 |
7 |
3 |
0.05 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
Total |
400 |
400 |
400 |
400 |
400 |
|
Estimated
|
1.4870 |
0.5475 |
2.380442 |
2.659408 |
|
6.417 |
38.21 |
6.21 |
4.17 |
d.f. |
3 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
p- vale |
0.0930 |
0 |
0.1018 |
0.2437 |
Table 4 Distribution of number of Chromatid aberrations
No. of yeast cell per square |
Observed |
Expected frequency |
frequency |
DS |
PD |
PLD |
PAD |
0 |
413 |
413.01 |
374 |
405.7 |
409.5 |
1 |
124 |
134.97 |
177.4 |
133.6 |
128.7 |
2 |
42 |
38.92 |
42.1 |
42.6 |
42.1 |
3 |
15 |
10.49 |
6.6 |
13.3 |
13.9 |
4 |
5 |
2.71 |
0.8 |
4.1 |
4.6 |
5 |
0 |
0.68 |
0.1 |
1.2 |
1.5 |
6 |
2 |
0.22 |
0 |
0.5 |
0.7 |
Total |
601 |
601 |
601 |
601 |
601 |
|
Estimated
|
1.5385 |
0.47421 |
2.685373 |
2.915059 |
|
5.562 |
48.17 |
1.34 |
0.29 |
d.f. |
3 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
p- vale |
0.1350 |
0 |
0.7196 |
0.9619 |
Table 5 Mammalian cytogenetic dosimetry lesions in rabbit lymphoblast induced by streptonigrin (NSC-45383), Exposure-60
No. of yeast cell per square |
Observed |
Expected frequency |
frequency |
DS |
PD |
PLD |
PAD |
0 |
200 |
200.01 |
172.5 |
191.8 |
194.1 |
1 |
57 |
70.01 |
95.4 |
70.3 |
67.6 |
2 |
30 |
21.51 |
26.4 |
24.9 |
24.5 |
3 |
7 |
6.17 |
4.9 |
8.6 |
8.9 |
4 |
4 |
1.69 |
0.7 |
2.9 |
3.2 |
5 |
0 |
0.45 |
0.1 |
1 |
1.1 |
6 |
2 |
0.16 |
0 |
0.5 |
0.6 |
Total |
300 |
300 |
300 |
300 |
300 |
|
Estimated
|
1.4798 |
0.55333 |
2.35334 |
2.62674 |
|
8.191 |
29.68 |
3.91 |
3.12 |
d.f. |
3 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
p- vale |
0.0422 |
0 |
0.1415 |
0.2101 |
Table 6 Mammalian cytogenetic dosimetry lesions in rabbit lymphoblast induced by streptonigrin (NSC-45383), Exposure-75
No. of yeast cell per square |
Observed |
Expected frequency |
frequency |
DS |
PD |
PLD |
PAD |
0 |
155 |
155.01 |
127.8 |
158.3 |
160.7 |
1 |
83 |
82.63 |
109 |
77.2 |
74.3 |
2 |
33 |
37.2 |
46.5 |
35.9 |
35.3 |
3 |
14 |
15.41 |
13.2 |
16.1 |
16.5 |
4 |
11 |
6.08 |
2.8 |
7.1 |
7.5 |
5 |
3 |
2.32 |
0.5 |
3.1 |
3.3 |
6 |
1 |
1.35 |
0.2 |
2.3 |
2.4 |
Total |
300 |
300 |
300 |
300 |
300 |
|
Estimated
|
1.1301 |
0.853333 |
1.617611 |
1.963313 |
|
3.432 |
24.97 |
1.51 |
1.98 |
d.f. |
4 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
p- vale |
0.4883 |
0 |
0.6799 |
0.5766 |
Table 7 Mammalian cytogenetic dosimetry lesions in rabbit lymphoblast induced by streptonigrin (NSC-45383), Exposure-90
No. of yeast cell per square |
Observed |
Expected frequency |
frequency |
DS |
PD |
PLD |
PAD |
0 |
187 |
187.01 |
155.6 |
185.3 |
187.9 |
1 |
77 |
87.72 |
117 |
83.5 |
80.2 |
2 |
40 |
35.21 |
43.9 |
35.9 |
35.3 |
3 |
17 |
13.07 |
11 |
15 |
15.4 |
4 |
6 |
4.62 |
2.1 |
6.1 |
6.6 |
5 |
2 |
1.58 |
0.3 |
2.5 |
2.7 |
6 |
1 |
0.79 |
0.1 |
1.7 |
1.9 |
Total |
330 |
330 |
330 |
330 |
330 |
|
Estimated
|
1.2345 |
0.751515 |
1.804268 |
2.139736 |
|
3.721 |
31.93 |
1.43 |
1.35 |
d.f. |
4 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
Table 8 Observed abd expected number of days that experienced X thunderstroms event at Cape Kennedy, Florida for 11-year period of record for the month of June, January 1957 to December 1967
No. of yeast cell per square |
Observed |
Expected frequency |
frequency |
DS |
PD |
PLD |
PAD |
0 |
177 |
177.01 |
142.3 |
177.7 |
180 |
1 |
80 |
93.79 |
124.4 |
88 |
84.7 |
2 |
47 |
42.01 |
54.3 |
41.5 |
40.9 |
3 |
26 |
17.32 |
15.8 |
18.9 |
19.4 |
4 |
9 |
7.79 |
3.5 |
8.4 |
8.9 |
5 |
2 |
3.08 |
0.7 |
6.5 |
7.1 |
Total |
341 |
341 |
341 |
341 |
341 |
|
Estimated
|
1.1348 |
0.8739 |
1.583536 |
1.938989 |
|
6.972 |
39.74 |
5.15 |
5.02 |
d.f. |
4 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
p- vale |
0.1374 |
0 |
0.1611 |
0.1703 |
Table 9 Observed abd expected number of days that experienced X thunderstroms event at Cape Kennedy, Florida for 11-year period of record for the month of July, January 1957 to December 1967
No. of yeast cell per square |
Observed |
Expected frequency |
frequency |
DS |
PD |
PLD |
PAD |
0 |
185 |
184.99 |
151.8 |
184.8 |
187.5 |
1 |
89 |
92.42 |
122.9 |
87.2 |
83.9 |
2 |
30 |
39.27 |
49.7 |
39.3 |
38.6 |
3 |
24 |
15.39 |
13.4 |
17.1 |
17.5 |
4 |
10 |
6.74 |
2.7 |
7.3 |
7.6 |
5 |
3 |
2.19 |
0.5 |
5.3 |
5.9 |
Total |
341 |
341 |
341 |
341 |
341 |
|
Estimated
|
1.1828 |
0.809384 |
1.693425 |
2.038417 |
|
8.987 |
49.49 |
5.03 |
4.69 |
d.f. |
4 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
p- vale |
0.0414 |
0 |
0.1696 |
0.196 |
Table 10 Observed abd expected number of days that experienced X thunderstroms event at Cape Kennedy, Florida for 11-year period of record for the month of August, January 1957 to December 1967
No. of yeast cell per square |
Observed |
Expected frequency |
frequency |
DS |
PD |
PLD |
PAD |
0 |
549 |
549.01 |
449 |
547.5 |
555.1 |
1 |
246 |
274.27 |
364.8 |
259 |
249.2 |
2 |
117 |
117 |
116.54 |
148.2 |
116.9 |
3 |
67 |
45.67 |
40.1 |
51.2 |
52.3 |
4 |
25 |
17.04 |
8.1 |
21.9 |
23.2 |
5 |
7 |
7.16 |
1.3 |
9.2 |
10 |
6 |
1 |
2.31 |
0.5 |
6.3 |
7.3 |
Total |
1012 |
1012 |
1012 |
1012 |
1012 |
|
Estimated
|
1.1828 |
0.812253 |
1.68899 |
2.033715 |
|
16.824 |
119.45 |
9.6 |
9.4 |
d.f. |
5 |
3 |
4 |
4 |
p- vale |
0.0048 |
0 |
0.0477 |
0.0518 |
Table 11 Observed abd expected number of days that experienced X thunderstroms event at Cape Kennedy, Florida for 11-year period of record for Summer, January 1957 to December 1967
Conclusions
In this article, the discrete Shanker distribution has been introduced by discretizing the continuous Shanker distribution. We have studied some properties of the distributions. Further the applications of the distribution and goodness of fit of the distribution.
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of interest
References
- Shanker R. Amarendra distribution and its applications. American journal of Mathematics and Statistics. 2016;6(1):44–56.
- Adhikari TR, Srivastava RS. A size-biased poisson-lindley distribution. International Journal of Mathematical Modeling and Physical Sciences. 2013;1(3):1–5.
- Adhikari TR, Srivastava RS. Poisson-size-biased lindley distribution. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publication. 2014;4(3):1–6.
- Borah M.The Genenbauer distribution revisited: Some recurrence relation for moments, cumulants, etc., estimation of parameters and its goodness of fit. Journal of Indian Society of Agricultural Statistics. 1984;36(1):72–78.
- Borah M, Begum R. Some properties of Poisson-Lindley and its derive distributions. Journal of the Indian Statistical Association. 2000;4:13–25.
- Borah M, Deka Nath A. A study on the inflated poisson lindley distribution. Journal of Indian Soc. Ag. Statistics. 2001;54(3) 317–323.
- Dutta P, Bora M. Some properties and application of size-biased poisson- lindley distribution. International Journal of Mathematical Archive. 2014a;5(1):89–96.
- Dutta P, Borah M. Zero-modified poisson-lindley distribution. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation. (2014b);79(3):279–287.
- Fisher RA. The effects of methods of ascertainment upon the estimation of frequency. Ann Eugenics. 1934;6(1):13–25.
- Ghitany ME, Atiech B, Nadarajah S. Lindley distribution and its applications, Mathematics and Computers in Simulation. (2008a);78(4):493–506.
- Ghitany ME, Al-Mutari DK. Size-biased Poisson - lindley distribution and its application. Metron-International Journal of Statistics LXVI. 2008b;(3):299–311.
- Ghitany ME, Al-Mutairi DK. Estimation methods for the discrete Poisson-Lindley distribution. J Stat Comput Simul. 2009;79(1) 1–9.
- Gomez-Deniz E. Another generalization of the geometric distribution. Test. 2010;19(2):399–415.
- Gove HJ. Estimation and application of size-biased distributions in forestry. In: Amaro & D. Reed, editors. Modeling Forest systems A. CAB International, Wallingford, UK. 2003;201–212.
- Johnson NL, Kemp AW, Kotz S. Univariate discrete distributions. Hoboken NJ and John Wiley & Sons, USA; 2005..
- Kemp AW. The discrete half-normal distribution. MA Advances in Mathematical and Statistical Modelling. Birkhauser, Boston, USA; 2008:353–365.
- Krishna H, Pundir PS. Discrete Burr and discrete pareto distributions. Stat Methodol. 2009;6:177–188.
- Lappi J, Bailey RL. Estimation of diameter increment function or other relations using angle-count samples. Forest Science. 1987;33:725–739.
- Lindley DV. Fiducial distributions and Bayes’ theorem. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B. 1958;20(1):102–107.
- Mahmoudi E, Zakerzadeh H. Generalized poisson lindley distribution. Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods. 2010; 39(10):1785–1798.
- Marshall AW, Olkin I. A new method for adding a parameter to a family of distributions with application to the exponential and Weibull families. Biometrika. 1997;84(3):641–652.
- Nakagawa T, Osaki S.The discrete Weibull distribution. IEE Trans Reliab. 1975;24(5):300–301.
- Patil GP, Ord JK. On size-biased sampling and related form-invariant weighted distributions. Sankhya. 1975;38(1):48–61.
- Patil GP, Rao CR. The weighted distributions: a survey and their applications. In Applications of Statistics. 1977;383–405.
- Patil GP, Rao CR. Weighted distributions and size-biased sampling with applications to wild life populations and human families. Biometrics. 1978;34:179–189.
- Rao CR. On discrete distributions arising out of methods on ascertainment, classical and contagious discrete distribution. In: Patil GP, editor. Statistical Publishing Society. 1965;320-332.
- Roy D. Discrete rayleigh distribution. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 2004;53(2):255–260.
- Sankaran M. The discrete poisson-lindley distribution. Biometrics. 1970;26:145–149.
- Shanker R, Mishra A. A two parameter poisson- lindley distribution. International journal of Statistics and Systems. 2014;9(1): 79–85.
- Shanker R. Shanker distribution and its Applications. International Journal of Statistics and Applications. 2015;5(6):338–348.
- Shanker R, Mishra A. A quasi Lindley distribution. African Journal of Mathematics and Computer Science Research. 2013; 6(4):64–71.
- Shanke R, Sharma S, Shanker R. A discrete two-parameter poisson-lindley distribution. Journal of the Ethiopian Statistical Association. 2012;21:15–22.
- Shanke R, Sharma S, Shanker R. Janardan distribution and its applications to waiting times data. Indian Journal of Applied research. 2013;3(8):500–502.
- Shanker R, Tekie Asehun Leonida. A new quasi poisson- lindley distribution. International Journal of Statistics and Systems. 2014;9(1):87–94.
- Shanke, R, Sharma S, Shanker R, et al. The discrete Poisson- Janardan distribution with applications. International Journal of Soft Computing and Engineering. 2014;4(2):31–33.
- Van Deusen PC. Fitting assumed distributions to horizontal point sample Diameters. Forest Science. 1986;32(1):146–148.
©2017 Borah, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the,
which
permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.