Submit manuscript...
Advances in
eISSN: 2373-6402

Plants & Agriculture Research

Research Article Volume 9 Issue 1

The contribution of genetic resistance of potato varieties on virus

Ioan Gontariu

Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava, Faculty of Food Engineering, Romania

Correspondence: Ioan Gontariua, Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava, Faculty of Food Engineering, University Street 13, 720229, Suceava. Romania,

Received: August 21, 2017 | Published: January 24, 2018

Citation: Gontariu I. The contribution of genetic resistance of potato varieties on virus. Adv Plants Agric Res. 2019;9(1):157-160. DOI: 10.15406/apar.2019.09.00429

Download PDF

Abstract

World production of potato is second to cereals. One of the most efficient key factors of increasing potato production is the quality of seed potato as planting material. In order to control the varieties production, it is necessary the use of a high biological value material, with no viral diseases. The present study revealed that the ELISA method is applicable for the determination of the viral infection degree with effect on the yield of potato seeding material from superior biological categories. Also, the elimination of virus-infected plants using the ELISA method has resulted in a higher yield of potato seeding material from superior biological categories (SE and E basis).

Keywords: planting material, varieties, biologic potential

Introduction

Of late years, as a consequence of the decay of fossils resources and of the increase of agricultural yield, the role of the biological resources has grown. Therefore, it has become common the use of superior genetic structures which are materialized through high quality seeds, forming a variety or a hybrid.1-4 The viruses control represents one of the most complicated issues of plants’ protection.5-7 The losses from agriculture caused by plants infection with viruses can be enormous.8-10 The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of planting area, variety, planting time, vegetation interruption time, biological category and virus infection on the yield of potato seeding material.

Materials and methods

Materials

Considering the variety as a technological factor for realizing high production yields at performing agriculture level, the creation of new potato varieties solves two major problems: offers the agricultural producers the varieties which are consonant with the ecological conditions and with the zone specific technology; and succeeds in applying the specific technology for the morphological attributes of the created varieties in the existent pedoclimate conditions. The selected planting areas (Figure 1) were from Suceava County, Romania: the Experimental Center in Lucina locality (altitude of 1400 m) and the Station for Agriculture Research and Development in Suceava – SARD (altitude of approx. 400 m). The studied potato varieties (Figure 2), created and certified at the Station for Agriculture Research and Development in Suceava, with the year of their entering in the system of seed material production and reproduction are presented in Table 1. 

Figure 1 Planting areas under study

                                                                 a) Rapsodia Variety                     b) Astral Variety

Figure 2 Potato varieties under study

Variety

Certification year

Vegetation period

Peridema color

Production capacity (q/ha)

Astral “N”

2001

half-early

yellow

357

Rapsodia “N”

2002

half-early

yellow

420

Table 1 Studied potato varieties

Methods

The experiments were conducted according to „latin square subdivided plots” method, on type 2×2×2×2, in four replications,11 taking into consideration the following factors;

  1. The planting area
  2. The variety
  3. The planting time
  4. The vegetation interruption time
  5. And the biological category

The factors’ classes are presented in Table 2. The complex effect of all studied factors was studied and interpreted in all experimental years, going to clone D (prebasis) taking in the study the seeding material yield for both varieties. Fertilization of the potato plots with N:P:K, 100:100:100kg s.a/ha, in a balanced rapport, was accomplished. The tubers were planted semi-mechanically at a distance of 21.5cm between tubers and 70cm between rows, using the fraction of 30-45mm. In order to destroy of the potato herbage the first treatment was made mechanically, at warning–after 70 days from the plant sprouting. The second treatment was made with Diquat (Reglone forte) 5 l/ha. After three weeks from the vegetation interruption, the harvesting of the tubers was accomplished. The ELISA (Enzyme-Linked-Immuno-Sorbent-Assay) technique was used for the study of diseases produced by the virus of crop plants and also to detect low concentration of viruses in the studied potato cultures. It permits a simple and accurate detection of viruses in stems and in other vegetative organs of plants. Its principle is based on the interaction antigen–antibody. The applied method was DAS–ELISA (double antibody sandwich - ELISA). The tested viruses were: PLRV (potato leaf roll virus), PVA (potato virus A), PVM (potato virus M), PVS (potato virus S), PVX (potato virus X), PVY (monoclonal and polyclonal potato virus Y). There were used the following reagents: IgG (immuno-conjugate), conjugate, positive control, negative control, extraction buffer, coating buffer, conjugate buffer, washing buffer, substrate, micro plates, substrate (pNPP tablets). Due to the test’s high sensibility, viruses could be detected before symptoms manifestation.

Technological factor

Code

Factor’s Classes

Planting area

A

A_a1

ARDS

 

A_a2

Lucina

Variety

B

B_b1

Rapsodia

 

B_b2

Astral

Planting time

C

C_c1

Early Spring

 

C_c2

30 days after Early Spring

Vegetation interruption time

D

D_d1

at warning

 

D_d2

30 days after warning

Biological category

E

E_e1

SE basis

 

E_e2

E basis

 

E_e3

Certified A

Table 2 Technological factors under study

Results and discussion

As it can be seen in Table 3, the seeding material yield was mostly dependent on the planting time. The yield was diminished with 32% (56.5 q/ha) when planting the potatoes 30 days later. A significant decreasing was also observed for the vegetation interruption factor, the yield at 20 days after warning being smaller with 17% (26.7 q/ha) comparing with the culture with vegetation interruption at warning. Considering the biological category factor, the SE class basis culture presented a potato seed yield with 11% (17.8 q/ha) above the yield of the certified A culture. The yield of Rapsodia variety culture surpassed the Astral variety culture’s yield with 13% (17.5 q/ha). Also, in comparison with Suceava culture, at Lucina it was registered an increase in potato seeding material yield with 9% (13.3 q/ha), as it can be observed in Figure 3. From Table 4 it can be observed effect of planting time and vegetation interruption time on the cultures’ yield (q/ha) and Table 5 show the influence of variety on the cultures’ yield (q/ha) at different planting times and different vegetation interruption times. The relative yield decrease due to the vegetation interruption time was depended to a certain extent by the planting time. The data in the table reveal that the best results were obtained when the planting was realized earlier and the vegetation interruption was made at warning, for both planting areas and varieties. Quantitatively, when the crop establishment is accomplished earlier, the vegetation interruption at warning is more important than the later planting. The later planting generated the same quantitative decreasing at both varieties, independent of the planting area (Suceava or Lucina).

Technological factor

 

PSM (q/ha)

Differences

A

A_a1

140.7

standard.

A_a2

154

13.3***

B

B_b1

138.6

standard

B_b2

156.1

17.5***

C

C_c1

175.6

standard

C_c2

119.1

-56.5ooo

D

D_d1

160.7

standard

D_d2

134

-26.7ooo

E

E_e1

155.5

standard

E_e2

149

-6.5

E_e3

137.7

-17.8ooo

Table 3 The potato seeding material yield (q/ha) dependence on the technological factors

*PSM - Potato seeding material; DL (limit difference) 5 % = 6.0 q/ha; ***significant increases; 1% = 8.3q/ha; 0.1 % = 11.5 q/ha; ooosignificant decrease

Figure 3 The influence of the technological factors on the potato seeding material relative yields

 *DL - limit difference; *83, 100 – the values of relative yield (%) of potato according to vegetation interruption; 68, 100 – the values of relative yield (%) of potato according to planting time; 113, 100 – the values of relative yield (%) of potato according to variety; 89, 96, 100 – the values of relative yield (%) of potato according to biological category; 68, 100 – the values of relative yield (%) of potato according to planting time; 111, 100 – the values of relative yield (%) of potato according to locality.

Technological factor

 

A

B

 

PSM (q/ha)

C

D

         

C_c1

D_d1

 

A_a1

B_b1

 

169.5

 

D_d2

       

142.6

C_c2

D_d1

       

111.2

 

D_d2

       

105.5

C_c1

D_d1

 

A_a1

B_b2

 

189.8

 

D_d2

       

160.2

C_c2

D_d1

       

128.7

 

D_d2

       

118.1

DL 5 %

         

8.1 q/ha

DL 1 %

         

11.1 q/ha

DL 0.1 %

         

15.0 q/ha

C_c1

D_d1

A_a2

   

B_b1

197.5

 

D_d2

       

156.7

C_c2

D_d1

       

130.3

 

D_d2

       

96

C_c1

D_d1

A_a2

   

B_b2

220.1

 

D_d2

       

169

C_c2

D_d1

       

138.2

 

D_d2

       

124.7

DL 5 %

         

6.4 q/ha

DL 1 %

         

8.7 q/ha

DL 0.1 %

 

 

 

 

 

11.8 q/ha

Table 4 The effect of planting time and vegetation interruption time on the cultures’ yield (q/ha)

*PSM - Potato seeding material, *DL - limit difference

B

Technological factor

A_a1

 

A_a2

 

 

 

PSM (q/ha)

Differences

PSM (q/ha)

Differences

C

B_b1

C_c1

156

Standard

177.1

Standard

 

C_c2

108.3

-47.7ooo

113.1

-64.0ooo

B_b2

C_c1

174.9

Standard

194.4

Standard

 

C_c2

123.3

-51.6ooo

131.4

-63.0ooo

D

B_b1

D_d1

140,3

Standard

163.9

Standard

 

D_d2

124,0

-16.3ooo

126.3

-37.6ooo

B_b2

D_d1

159,2

Standard

179.1

Standard

 

D_d2

139,0

-20.2ooo

146.7

-32.4ooo

 

DL 5%

 

8.1 q/ha

 

6.4 q/ha

 

DL 1%

 

11.1 q/ha

 

8.7 q/ha

 

DL 0.1%

 

15.0 q/ha

 

11.8 q/ha

Table 5 The influence of variety on the cultures’ yield (q/ha) at different planting times and different vegetation interruption times

*PSM - Potato seeding material; *DL-limit difference; ooo significant decrease

Conclusions

The ELISA technique is indicated on a wide scale for the tests of events on the field, in the study of the diseases produced by the viruses which result from plants of culture. The sensibility of this method in the direct detection of viruses in the plants’ extracts, can drive us to the study on the field of these viruses for which we have not found available adequate practical methods. Among the measures which had a major negative impact on potato seeding material yield, the later planting is the first, followed by later vegetation interruption. The yield diminishing as a consequence of later vegetation interruption was significantly amplified when the planting was conducted later, for both planting areas (Suceava and Lucina) and varieties (Astral and Rapsodia).

Acknowledgements

None.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declared there is no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Draica C. Interruption of vegetation, essential work in producing seed potato, Potatoes in Romania. 1995;5:(2-3):34–36.
  2. Draica C. Modernizarea tehnologiei de producere a cartofului pentru sămânță (The potato’s diseases and pests. The modernization of the technology of seed potato processing). Phoenix Publisher, Brașov, 2004. 187 p.
  3. Tuomisto J. Contract production as a method to reduce welfare loss caused by market uncertainty of seed potato. Agricultural and Food Science. 2007;16:3–16 p.
  4. Ameline A, Martoub M, Sourice S. Et al. Effects of mineral oil on the potato aphid Macrosiphum euphorbiae, Potato for a Changing World: Conference of European Association for Potato Research, 2008;17: 156–157.
  5. Ulrich G, Neitzel K, Scholz M. Untersuchungen zum Kartoffelabbau unter trockenen und warmen Anbaubedingungen der Südukraine (Studies on potato digestion under dry and warm cultivation conditions of southern Ukraine). EuropeanPotato Journal. 1963;6(4):227–241.
  6. Boțoman G, Ianosi SI. Combaterea integrată a bolilor și dăunătorilor din cultura cartofului (Integral preventing of diseases and pests from potato culture). Valahia Publisher, Bucharest. 2005. 325 p.
  7. Kapsa J. Important threats in potato production and integrated pathogen/pest management. Potato for a Changing World: Conference of European Association for Potato Research. 2008;17:14–17.
  8. Anderson ED, Stark DM, Nelson RS, et al. Transgene plants that express the coat protein gene of TMV or AIMV interfere with disease development of unrelated viruses. Phytopathology. 1989;79:1284–1290.
  9. Iacob V. Bolile plantelor cultivate - prevenire şi combatere (The diseases of cultivated plants, prevention and control). “Ion Ionescu de la Brad” Publisher, Iași. 2002. 400 p.
  10. Ianosi IS. Bazele cultivǎrii cartofului pentru consum (Potato cultivation bases for consumption). Phoenix Publisher, Braşov. 2002. 303 p.
  11. Săulescu NA, Săulescu NN. Câmpul de experienţă (The experience field). Agrosilvică Publisher, Bucureşti. 1967;376 p.
Creative Commons Attribution License

©2018 Gontariu. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.