Letter to Editor Volume 1 Issue 2
Solid 24He and zero−point energy
Namwetako JS, Tonui JK, Khanna KM, Tanui PK
Regret for the inconvenience: we are taking measures to prevent fraudulent form submissions by extractors and page crawlers. Please type the correct Captcha word to see email ID.
Department of Physics, University of Eldoret, Kenya
Correspondence: Tanui PK, Department of Physics, University of Eldoret, P.O Box 1125−30100, Kenya, Tel +2547 2080 0446
Received: February 26, 2018 | Published: March 26, 2018
Citation: Namwetako JS, Tonui JK, Tanui PK. Solid 4 2 He and zero-point energy . Open Acc J Math Theor Phy. 2018;1(2):43 – 45 DOI: 10.15406/oajmtp.2018.01.00008
Download PDF
Abstract
At very low temperatures,
becomes crystalline under high pressure of order of 65 Atmospheres or more. The
solid structure is hexagonal close packed (HCP) and the size of the crystal increases.
, being a quantum solid, is intrinsically restless with a large zero – point energy
, which is of the order of 98 percent of the total energy,
, in the crystalline state. The balance two percent will be the energy due to interparticle interaction. The total energy in the crystalline state can be calculated using the Gaussian form of the Lennard – Jones potential and the t – matrix formalism. The zero – point energy is calculated using Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle. If
is to be of the order of 98 percent of
, the interparticle distance X turns out to be of the order of 1.5 Å, which is less than the hard sphere radius.
Keywords: zero – point energy,
– transition, Hexagonal close pack, bose condensate
Introduction
It is found that cooling
liquid from
towards absolute zero temperature does not result in the solidification of
liquid. However,
becomes solid under large external pressure of the order of 25 Atmospheres or more. Helium was first solidified in Leiden by W. H. Keesom.1 Measurements on specific heat and thermal conductivity of solid Helium are given by H. R. Glyde.2 To study the properties of any interacting system, such as solid
, the pair potential between the atoms has to be precisely known. Between the Helium atoms, the pair potential,3,4
, is weakly attractive at large separation,
Å, with a minimum well depth
. At close approach,
Å, where hard – core radius is
. For
,
becomes steeply repulsive. The volume of solid
is 21.1cm3/mole. Since Helium is light, its thermal wavelength
, is long. At
,
for
. Helium is
thus difficult to localize. Attempts to localize it leads to a high kinetic or zero – point energy. Since
, is weak,
Helium does not solidify under attraction via
. Rather, it solidifies only under large external pressure as a
Consequence of the existence of the hard core of
, much as billiard balls form a lattice under pressure. At higher pressure,
gets compressed into close−packed (FCC and HCP) phases. At 4.9 k-bars, FCC
has a volume of 9.03cm3/mole and
.
The degree of the quantumness in a solid is sometimes characterized by
……… (1)
Where
, is the de Boer parameter, which is the ratio of the de Broglie wavelength,
to the minimum separation of the atoms in the crystal which is
. If
is comparable to
, the solid is highly quantum. Moreover, the de Boer parameter
and the Lindmann ratio
are practically identical, and thus a large
means quantum and very anharmonic vibration.
In physics, a quantum solid is the type of solid that is intrinsically restless, in the sense that atoms continuously vibrate about their position and exchange places even at absolute zero temperature. The typical quantum solid, both in low density and high density, is the solid
which is crystalline and is hexagonal – close – packed system. The atoms in a quantum crystalline solid are arranged in a regular array that may be characterized by a lattice of points. The atoms are held in the lattice by the inter – atomic bonds, meaning thereby that the atoms interact with each other, and there may be some specific form of interaction potential between the atoms. We now turn to the basic ideas and information that lead us to write the present manuscript. The properties of
are dominated by the quantum – mechanical effect called zero – point motion which is the dynamical property of
. Due to the low
atomic mass and weak inter–atomic forces
, atoms do not freeze even in the limit of zero temperature. Liquid
can be solidified only on the application of external pressure of 25bars or more, in addition to cooling. The effect allows the presence of delocalized vacancies in the crystalline solid that can condense into a coherent state at low temperatures.5 Even when it becomes solid, the liquid – solid transition is not well understood.
In this manuscript, we have concentrated on the physical characteristics of solid
, one is that
crystals will be treated as quantum crystals, and the second is the calculation of the interaction energy between the
atoms.
Since a quantum solid is intrinsically restless, the uncertainties in the values of position r and the momentum
should be finite, and they are large in
because of its low mass. Hence,
and
should be large. At absolute
zero temperature,6,7 the zero – point fluctuations of atoms in solid
are about 30 percent of the inter−atomic
spacing and as a consequence the zero – point energy represents roughly 98 percent of the total energy of the crystal.
This means that in the crystalline state
, the interaction energy between the helium atoms will be roughly 2 percent of the total energy of the system. Thus, if
is the total energy and
is interaction energy, and
is the zero – point energy, then,
……………………… (3)
Zero – Point Energy (ZPE)
If X is the average inter–particle distance or inter−atomic spacing of the linear lattice, then the zero – point fluctuation
of the atoms in solid helium is about 30 percent of
. Hence,
…………………… (4)
In the literature,7
has two values, one is when
, and second when
. Both of these values will be used to get the numerical value for the zero – point – energy
. Now, if
is the uncertainty in the value of the position, and
is the uncertainty in the value of the momentum, then according to Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle,
……………………… (5)
The zero−point−energy is then given by
……… (6)
Where
is the mass of the
atom. Eq. (6) shows that the value of zero–point–energy
changes as
, varies and the value of
depend on the value of
as shown in Eq. (4).
Here we have quoted two extreme values for
. It is simple to calculate the value of
that will lead to the value of
that will be 98 percent of the total energy
. Again there are two values for
in the literature;7
and
. In order that
be 98 percent of
,the value of
will be the order of
which means that in the crystalline state the inter−particle distance between the atoms should be of the order of
. However, this needs to be verified experimentally, may be by using the neutron scattering method.
Conclusion
Our calculations bring out that if the zero−point−energy
, is to be 98 percent of the total energy
, then the inter-particle distance between
atoms should be of the order of
which is less than the hard−core radius. More experimental and theoretical work needs to be done to determine the exact value of the fluctuation in position
since this will determine
, and we then calculate whether
is really 98 percent of
. In our next attempt, many−body theory will be used to calculate
.
Acknowledgements
Conflict of interest
Author declares that there is no conflict of interest.
References
- Keesom WH. Comm. Kamerlingh Onnes. 1926.
- Glyde HR. Excitations in Liquid and Solid Helium. Clarendon Press, Oxford. 1994.
- Aziz RA. In Inert Gases. Springer −Verlag, Berlin: Heidelberg; 1984.
- Korona T, Wiilliams HL, Bukowski R, et al. Helium dimer potential from symmetry−adapted perturbation theory calculations using large Gaussian geminal and orbital basis sets. Journal of Chemical Physics. 1977;106:5109
- Khanna KM, Ayodo YK, Sakwa TW, et al. Pair distribution function for interacting bosons and the ground−state energy of solid helium−4. Indian Journal of Pure and Applied Physics. 2009;47(5):325−331.
- Khanna KM, Das BK. Excitation spectrum for interacting bosons. Physica. 1973;69(2):611−622.
- Nosanov HL. Phys Rev. 1966;18:120
- Glyde HR. Private Communication on Solid .2010.
©2018 Namwetako, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the,
which
permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.