The Theorem states that: if a, b, c is positive integers then there is no natural integer
such that:
(1)
We will assume that Fermat’s Theorem is valid, that is we accept that there are positive integers a, b, c and a natural integer n>2 for which equation (1) is satisfied.
Let us consider the relationship:
where x is a positive real number, y a positive integer, and z a positive real number. Also, let us assume that
and
We will prove that the above relationship is valid:
Let y be a positive integer such that
and
a natural integer such that
Then the number
is a positive integer number. Also, let
be a positive real number such that
andna natural integer such that
Then the number
is positive real number. If
Then
is a positive real number as the sum of a positive integer number and a positive real number.
As a positive real number,
can be written in the form
wherenis an integer number and
Assigning
see Appendix A yields:
where
is a positive real number
For
it holds that
because:
Since
it follows that
(2)
Similarly,
implies that
(3)
Adding relations (2) and (3) yields:
In addition to equation (1) that we assume to be true, we have now proved that:
(4)
Subtracting (1) from (4) we obtain a new equation:
(5)
As produced by equations (1) and (4), equation (5) applies only if equation (1) holds, given that equation (4) was proved valid.
Notice that we must not accept all the triples of the form:
where
is any positive integer and
If we accept these triples, from equation (5) we will have:
where
any positive integer number
If
where
any positive integer number, then
Dividing by
yields
Therefore, the use of the equation:
becomes unavailing.
Note that we must also exclude all the Pythagorean triples, because if
is a Pythagorean triple then all triples
where
any positive integer, are also Pythagorean. We suppose that equation (5) is true because it results from equation (1) (Fermat’s Theorem) which we have assumed it is true. We will show that equation (5) always leads to a mathematical contradiction, thus proving that the equation initially assumed to be true (in our case Fermat’s Theorem) is false.
In the following section, we will show that equation (5) cannot be true, because it leads to a contradiction. This automatically means that equation (1) is a false statement, because equation (4) is true and equation (5) has resulted from (1) and (4). We follow a 2-part proofing process, with the final outcome presented in the results section.
Part 1
In this section we will start from equation (5) (i.e. we assume equation (1) is valid) and we will show that
Equation (5) states that
Since
we obtain
and
Dividing by
yields:
and as
we can further proceed as:
<
Therefore
The last equation can be written as:
(6)
Both sides of equation (6) can be viewed as functions of variable
(note that:
)
Since ais accumulation point for both sides of equation (6), it follows that:
In equation (7), the term
is a positive rational number.
Also, it holds that
because always
However, the definition of the exponential function:
Implies that
Where
is a function of variable
and
Let
and
so that the above definition can be written as:
with
Substituting the above into equation (7) yields:
(8)
Part 2
In this section we will start again from equation (5) (i.e. we assume equation (1) is valid) and we will show that
Beginning from equation (5):
Since
(9)
In the last equation, the quantities
and
are positive real numbers so we can consider their natural logarithm
and
Also, it holds that:
and
The quantities
and
are considered as functions of variable
x and
ais accumulation point for both of them.
Equation (9) now becomes:
(10)
Since
implies that
equation (10), and therefore equation (9), can be written as:>
(11)
while as previously stated:
and
At the limit of x®
a equation (11) becomes:
(12)
and
(13)
According to the well known property of exponential function:
Using the properties of limits we further get:
(14)
The
is defined because a is accumulation point for the function
(considered as function of variable).
Similarly we have:
(15)
Note the
is defined because a is an accumulation point for the function
(considered as a function of variable x).
Finally, applying the property of exponentiation:
we have:
(16)
and
(17)
Recall that through equations (12) and (13) we showed that the limit of equations
and (17) is
We will proceed by proving that
It holds that:
<
(18)
Also, it holds that
therefore
(19)
because
is always positive.
Equation (18) implies that:
(20) see Appendix B
By multiplying equations (19) and (20) we obtain:
Similarly, we get:
It holds that:
Thus,
equation (16) results
(in our case it holds that
) and equation (17) then results
(in our case it holds that
).
Generally
is an indeterminate form, but here we showed that
To facilitate the rest of the work, we write the outcome of equation (16) as:
(21)
where
and the outcome of equation (17) as:
(22)
Where
Therefore, equation (11) now gives:
and thus
The both limits exist because a is an accumulation point of the corresponding functions.
Finally:
Using equations
and
Using equations (21) and (22):
(23)
where
and
Now, we will prove that any quantity of the form
where
and
can always get the value
More specifically, we will show that:
where
and
We begin from the definition of the exponential function
and since
we can write:
or
If we raise both sides of the last equation to the power of
we have:
For the left-hand side of the last equation, the operation
is permitable according to the properties of limits.
Hence:
(24)
However,
Therefore:
Substituting into (24) yields:
(25)
where
and
which we intended to show.
In equations (23) and (25) we consider as
the quantities
and
which are functions of variable only (for
recall that:
)
and
Also, it holds that
Hence, equation (23) according to equation (25) gives:
(26)
From the definition of the exponential function we have:
since is for an accumulation point,
as a result:
or
The following equation:
(27)
is true in two cases:
- When
- When
Hence can take any value, provided that any of the 2 conditions stated above is preserved.
If we assume
we have:
So the value is acceptable and the equation (27) now becomes:
(28)
Where
This equation results directly from the definition of the exponential function and is applicable to any function that satisfies
We will now apply equation (28) to equation (26)
Note that we consider
and the
as functions of x and let us also point out that
and
From equation (26) we obtain:
and in accordance with equation (28)
by applying a property of logarithms,
and finally
(29)