Submit manuscript...
eISSN: 2574-9927

Material Science & Engineering International Journal

Review Article Volume 6 Issue 1

Theory and technology of air filtration: review

Atef MF Mohammed, Inas A Saleh, Yasser H Ibrahim, Nora RG Mohamed

Air Pollution Research Department, Environmental Research Division, Egypt

Correspondence: Atef MF Mohammed, Air Pollution Research Department, Environmental Research Division, National Research Centre, Giza, Egypt, Tel +201151143456, Fax +20 2 33370931

Received: October 02, 2021 | Published: February 4, 2022

Citation: Mohammed AMF, Saleh IA, Ibrahim YH, et al. Theory and technology of air filtration: review. Material Sci & Eng. 2022;6(1):6-12 DOI: 10.15406/mseij.2022.06.00173

Download PDF

Abstract

The development of modern science and technology, improving the level of industrialization, increase people's awareness of environmental protection were leaded to the world's demand for filter materials to purify the air. This review presented an overview of air pollutants classification, history of fiber materials, theory of air filtration technology, and traditional air filtration (materials, characteristics, advantages, disadvantages, and standards). In addition, the paper reviewed the mechanisms of filtration, which include diffusion, interception, intermolecular interaction, straining, inertial impaction, gravitation, and electrostatic interaction of particles on the filter surface. Different studies have revealed the possibilities for the utilization of activated carbon fiber in the removal of VOC or odor from gaseous emissions in the air.

Keywords: air pollutants, air filtration, HEPA, purification techniques

Introduction

Air pollution had become the biggest ecological environment problem, seriously affecting human health and life. It was claimed thousands of lives every year in countries like the USA.1–14 Europe, Australia, Japan,15–45 China,11 and the Netherlands.18 asthma, nausea, skin irritation, high blood pressure, cancer, birth defects can cause exposure to air pollutants (particulate matter (PM) and gaseous pollutants)28,30,46–67 along with respiratory and cardiovascular diseases.58,11,47 The effective control of airborne pollutants, harmful biological agents, allergens, and aerosol particles were the main issues concerned by people. Generally, the diameter of dust particles floating in the atmosphere ranges from 10 nm – 10 µm, which were the main ingredients of air pollution.1,48,2 A high-efficiency air filter could effectively remove bigger than 0.3 μm particles, but not smaller particles. For air purification, the filtration industry had been looking for a material to prepare a filter medium that could effectively filter particles below 0.3 μm. Nano-fiber materials had attracted people's attention because of their excellent surface-to-volume ratio and potential to be used in filtration.63,29,39,46,24,2

Classification of air pollutants

Classification of air pollutants was shown in Figure 1.5,29 The concentration of pollutants in the indoor atmosphere was 2 -5 times more than concentrations in the outdoor atmosphere.17 Cooking, heating, smoking, and air conditioning increase PM concentration.5,65 While in the outdoor atmosphere industrial activities and vehicle emissions were increased PM concentrations.21,40

Figure 1 Air pollutants classification and examples.5,29

History of fiber materials 

In 1940, a glass fiber filter material was prepared in the United States. From the 1950s to the 1970s, fiber filter materials developed rapidly, and HEPA (High-Efficiency Particulate Air) filters using glass fibers were applied to the purification of indoor air.32 To further improve, high-efficiency filters were used, and the filtration efficiency of particles ≥ 0.3 μm reaches 99.998%. Subsequently, an ultra-high efficiency filter (ULPA) was developed by Japan; the filtration efficiency of 0.1 μm particles could reach as high as 99.9955%.61

Technology theory of air filters

The theory of classical filtration was developed in the 19th century. Filtration and micro-porous filter theories were summarized in Table 1.

Researcher

Achievement

Robert Brown,  Beginning of 19th  century

Brownian movement

Freundlich

Penetrating particle size of particles range: 0.1 – 0.2 μm

Sell

Improved Albrecht theory

Kaufmann

First derived the fiber filtering formula

Langmuir

Filtration theory of interception and diffusion

Davies

Isolated fiber theory

Friedlander

Summarized diffusion deposition with bigger Reynolds number

Yoshioka & Clarenburg

A mathematical theory of fiber filter micro-porous structure

Payet & Renoux

The classical theory

Rosner

Particle dispersed on the surface of a single fiber

Thomas

Theoretical and experimental researched air filters under blocking condition

Table 1 Development process of filtration theory37

Filtration mechanisms included diffusion, intermolecular interaction, interception, straining, inertial impaction, gravitation, and electrostatic interaction of particles on the filter surface10,29 (Figure 2).

Figure 2 Schematic diagram of single fiber capture mechanisms.37,29

HEPA filters were captured Particles in five ways13:

  1. Sieve effect

This effect stoped large particles (> 5 µm in size) on a filter.

  1. Inertial impaction

It took place when large particles were unable to adjust to changes in the flow around fibers (Figure 3a).

  1. Interception

It occurred when a particle (0.1- 1 µm) came within the particle radius of a fiber (Figure 3b).

Figure 3a Inertial Impaction. Figure 3b Interception.

  1. Diffusion

Very fine particles (< 0.1 μm) would collide with gas molecules and create a random path through the media as shown in (Figure 3c).

  1. static charge

Figure 3c Brownian diffusion.
Figure 3 Ways of trapping particles in fine non-woven HEPA type filter media.13 

A charge would build up when the air stream passes over the fiber. The fiber material would play a part in how much charge will get built. The geometry and humidity in the air would affect how much charge the fiber will hold.

HEPA filters were getting rid of contaminants and impurities from atmospheric air. HEPA filters could clear the air from dust, pollen, pet dander, smoke, and almost all pollutants present in the air. But HEPA filter was extremely fragile and needs to be shipped, stored, and handled in the same manner as delicate instrumentation.8,13 HEPA filters were used in a wide variety of applications. Filters could be used for office equipment to remove toner dust to applications for industrial vacuum cleaners for asbestos removal.6 HEPA filters were also used in surgical operating rooms, and other critical medical air filtration to prevent the spread of airborne bacterial and viral organisms.33

Types of air filtration: Filter was a better choice to capture air pollutants. Its efficacy depended on air pollutant type and capturing mechanism.25,53

Porous membrane filter: Porous membrane filter: it was membrane matrix, such as polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) which contains many small pores.66,64 This kind of material had a high filtration effect, low air flux, and high air resistance.

Nonwoven fiber filter: it was a kind of material that had high porosity, high air flux, and low filtration efficiency.15,22,23,52,59,62

a) HEPA (High-Efficiency Particulate Air)

HEPA filter could remove at least 99.97% of dust, pollen, mold, bacteria, and any airborne particles with a size of 0.3 μm.7,43

b) ULPA (Ultra-low particulate air) 

It was captured PM with filtration efficiency53 (99.999%). These filters had the form of wet-laid papers, nonwoven fabrics, and air-laid glass fiber. These media contained low solids content, fiber volume < 10 % of the volume of the media. Its thickness was from mm to cm. Non-woven filtres were made from inorganic and organic fibers including wood pulp, cotton, or rayon.12,20 It had a mean flow pore (MFP) of 1 - 500 um.49

Nano-fibres: it was a new kind of filter material in recent years, which was developed by nano-technology. it had small fiber diameters with nano-scale pores, high specific surface area, and high van-der Waals forces.31,34,36,56,63,67,27,9,66,57,64,52

Materials of air filtres

Glass fiber material was used in 1940 as an air filter in the United States. The HEPA filter was used in the 1970s, with super fine glass fiber. It could achieve an efficiency of 99.9998% for ≥ 0.3 μm PM.38

  1. ACF (Activated carbon fiber) was developed in 1970 by the Japanese. Due to its advantages, it was considered to be one of the best air purification materials in the 21st century. It was with a uniform pore size distribution, high stripping speed, short adsorption trip, large adsorptive capacity, effective absorption pore, and easy regeneration.3
  2. In the late 1980s was born nano-technology (nano-fiber). It had surface tension, surface energy, and a larger specific surface area. These increased the deposition of PM from airborne on the fiber surface and increase efficiency.56
  3. A ULPA filter (Ultra Low Penetration Air Filter) was produced in the early 1990s by US Company Lydia. It was made from superfine glass fiber, which could be achieving an efficiency of 99.999999% for 0.1 μm PM.
  4. TiO2 (Nano-titanium dioxide) was photo-catalytic material. it was used to eliminate hazardous gases. its mechanism of working depends on excitation energy by UV (Ultraviolet), where when TiO2 material absorbed UV rays it leads to oxidation-reduction reaction, formation of strong oxidizing hydroxyl radicals and superoxide anionic radicals which could degrade nitrogen oxides (NOx), volatile organic compounds (VOCs) , sulfur dioxide (SO2), ammonia (NH3), carbon dioxide (CO2), and carbon monoxide (CO), etc.36

High-efficiency particle air filter (HEPA): It was made from microfibers borosilicate in form of a pleated sheet. Its media was a glass and polymer blend, and it was pleated to provide more material in a smaller space. The pleats were separated by aluminum baffles. This combination was installed into an outer frame made from board aluminum or stainless steel.35 Different types of HEPA filters were shown in Table 2.13

Types

Application

Efficiency

A

Industrial, non-critical

99.97 % for 0.3 μm

B

Nuclear containment

99.97 % for 0.3 μm

C

Laminar flow

99.99 % for 0.3 μm

D

Ultra-low penetration air (ULPA)

99.9995 % for 0.12 μm

E

Stopping toxic, nuclear, chemical, and biological threats

100.00%

Table 2 Types of HEPA Filters13

Air filter characteristics: The factors affecting the purification characteristics of air filtration materials were examined in different studies.12,54,26,37 The researchers found that air permeability and porosity were important properties for filtration. There was an extreme relationship between air permeability and porosity, as the porosity increases, air permeability increases also. In previous studies, another relationship had been investigated between air permeability and non-wovens structural characteristics (weight, density, thickness, and fiber diameter). Air permeability of fabric was affected by weight more than the thickness followed by density.12,4,19 The previous studies were mentioned that filtration efficiency was affected by fiber charge density and face velocity more than other factors. Where, efficiency increased with increasing fiber charge density and efficiency decreased with decreasing face velocity.37 The main atmospheric air pollutants could be divided into suspended particulate matter (SPM), volatile organic compounds (VOCs), and microorganisms. The effect of individual purification techniques on atmospheric air pollutants was listed in Table 3.61 Table 4 shows the characteristics of different purification technologies in building environments. A summary of different atmospheric air filtration techniques and efficiency was listed in Table 5.

Purification techniques

Main pollutants

 

 

 

Suspended particles

Volatile organic pollutants

Microorganisms

 

 

     
 

Dust, pollen, secondary pollutants, etc.

Formaldehyde, benzene, etc.

 

Diameter: 0.01 – 100 µm

Diameter: 0.01 – 100 µm

Bacteria

Virus

         
     

Diameter: 0.2 – 10 µm

Diameter: 0.01 – 0.3 µm

Filtration

Effective

None effective

Effective

None effective

Adsorption

Partially effective

Highly effective

Partially effective

None effective

Water washing

Effective

Partially effective

None effective

None effective

Electrostatic precipitation

Effective

Not obvious

Partially effective

None effective

Table 3 Effect of individual purification techniques on main types of pollutants37

Technologies

Pollutants

Advantages

Disadvantages

Efficiency

Fiber filtration

-  Particles

-  Low cost

-  High resistance

100.00%

 

-  Microorganisms

-  Convenient installation

Electrostatic

-  Particles

-  High efficiency

-  Efficiency decline after dust discharge

50%

 

-  Microorganisms

-  Wide range

 

Activated carbon adsorption

-  All pollutants except biological

-  Multiple sources

-  Saturation

 

 

-  High efficiency

-  Resistance 

Table 4 characteristics of different purification technologies in building environments37

Air filtration technique

Effective particles diameter

Efficiency (%)

Fibrous filter

Medium filter

> 0.3 µm

60 – 90

 

HEPA

> 0.3 µm

99.99

 

ULPA

0.12 – 0.17 µm

99.999

 

Glass fiber

2 - 10 µm

99

 

Nano-fiber

< 0.3 µm

> 99.99

Trombe wall

< 10 µm & < 0.01 µm

99.4 for PM10

Bio-filter

A dynamic botanical air filtration system

VOCs

> 33 for toluene

     

90 for formaldehyde

 

Integrated bio-filtration system

99

Electrostatic air filter

Electrostatic air filter

< 0.1 mm

82 - 94

 

Electrostatic precipitators

> 0.1 mm

Lower than HEPA

Cold plasma air filter

< 0.1 mm & VOCs

85 - 98

Table 5 Summary of air filtration techniques37

Air filter standards

Table 6 presents the air filter classifications standards according to the EN 779: 2012 standard16 and GB/T14295:2008-2016.37

Classification according to

Category

Filter class

Final pressure drop (Pa)

Average capture (Am) of industrial dust (%)

Average efficiency (Em) of 0.4 µm particles (%)

Minimum efficiency (Em) of 0.4 µm particles (%)

EN779:2012

Coarse

C1

250

 

50 ≤ Am < 65

-

-

   

C2

250

 

65 ≤ Am < 80

-

-

   

C3

250

 

80 ≤ Am < 90

-

-

   

C4

250

 

90 ≤ Am

-

-

 

Medium

M5

450

 

-

40 ≤ Em < 60

-

   

M6

450

 

-

60 ≤ Em < 80

-

 

Fine

F7

450

 

-

80 ≤ Em < 90

35

   

F8

450

 

-

90 ≤ Em < 95

55

   

F9

450

 

-

95 ≤ Em

70

Classification according to

Category

Filter class

Rated wind speed (m/s)

Purification efficiency (%)

Initial pressure drop (%)

     

Air filter

Filter media

   

GB/T14295:2008-2016

Sub high

YG

1

0.053

Diameter ≥0.5 μm

99.9 > E ≥ 95

≤120

 

High medium

GZ

1.5

0.1

-

95 > E ≥ 70

≤100

 

Medium 1

Z1

3

0.2

-

70 > E ≥ 60

≤80

 

Medium 2

Z2

-

-

-

60 > E ≥ 40

-

 

Medium 3

Z3

-

-

-

40 > E ≥ 20

-

 

Coarse 1

C1

2.5

1

Diameter ≥ 2.0 μm

E ≥ 50

≤50

 

Coarse 2

C2

-

-

Standard artificial dust weight efficiency

50 > E ≥ 20

-

 

Coarse 3

C3

-

-

-

E ≥ 50

-

 

Coarse 4

C4

-

-

-

E ≥ 50

-

Table 6 Air filter classification according to EN779:2012 and GB/T14295:2008-201616

Conclusions

Air filtration materials and techniques become essential in our life to reduce and eliminate high levels of atmospheric air pollutants, which affected human health and the environment. The advantages of classical fibrous filters were low cost, simple structure, and high efficiency. Although, they were characterized by high maintenance costs, filter colonization, and high-pressure drop. To overcome the disadvantages of classical physical filters need to be coated with chemicals or nano-particles. In addition, researchers were found single filtration techniques ineffective in presence of multiple atmospheric air pollutants types. Thus, they have suggested a combination of filtration techniques with other purification technologies to improve their efficiency to remove or eliminate pollutants.

Conflicts of interest

The author state that there is no conflict of interest.

Funding

None.

References

  1. Ain Q, Zaheer M. An Analysis of an Underground Water Flow Using Adomian Decomposition Method. Water Conserv Manag. 2019;V3(1):27–29.
  2. Ali M, Ain QT. Advances in Air Filters Based On Electrospun Nanofibers. Environmental Contaminants Reviews. 2020;V3(1):32–36.
  3. Bandosz TJ. Ania CO. Other forms of carbon absorbents. In TJ. Bandosz, editor. Activated carbon surfaces in environmental remediation. 2006.
  4. Berkalp OB. Air Permeability & Porosity in Spun–laced Fabrics, Fibers & Textiles in Eastern Europe. 2015;V14(3): 81–85.
  5. Bernstein JA, Alexis N and Barnes C. Health effects of air pollution. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004;V114(5):1116–1123.
  6. Bhuiyan N. A framework for successful new product development, Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management. 2011;V4(4):746–770.
  7. Brauch HG. Concepts of Security Threats, Challenges, Vulnerabilities, and Risks. In: Brauch H. et al. (eds) Coping with Global Environmental Change, Disasters and Security. Hexagon Series. 2011;V5: 61–106
  8. CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention). Biosafety in Microbiological and Biomedical Laboratories 5th ed, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Public Health Service Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Institutes of Health. 2009;104–107.
  9. Chen X, Xu Y. Honeycomb–like poly sulphone/polyurethane nano–fiber filter for the removal of organic/inorganic species from air streams, J Hazard Mater. 2018;V5(347):325–333.
  10. Colbeck I, Lazaridis M. Filtration Mechanisms. Aerosol Science: Technology and applications. Chichester, UK: Wiley. 2013.
  11. Dai J, Chen R, Meng X. Ambient air pollution, temperature, and out–of–hospital coronary deaths in Shanghai, China. Environ Pollut. 2015;V203:116–121.
  12. Das D, Pradhan AK. Composite Nonwovens, Textile Progress. 2011;V44(1):1–84.
  13. Dey E, Choudhary U, Ghosh SK. A review on surface modification of textile fiber by High–Efficiency Particulate Air (HEPA) Filtration process. American Journal of Engineering Research (AJER). 2017;6(10):190–193.
  14. Dockery DW, Pope CA, Xu X. An association between air pollution and mortality in six US cities. N Engl J Med. 1993;V 329(8).
  15. Du X, Wei J,et al. Polypropylene nonwoven surface modified through introducing porous microspheres: preparation, characterization and adsorption, Surf Sci. 2016;V360:525–533.
  16. European Committee for Standardization (Comité Européen De Normalisation). EN779: 2012 and energy efficiency classification. 2012.
  17. Fedel T. Air filtration: Evaluating filtration efficiency. Filter Sep. 2012;V49:37–39.
  18. Fleischer NL, Merialdi M, van Donkelaar A. Outdoor air pollution, preterm birth, and low birth weight: analysis of the world health organization global survey on maternal and perinatal health. (Research: Children’s Health) (Report). Environ Health Perspect. 2015;123:697–703.
  19. Goetzendorf–Grabowska B, Polus Z,et al. Antibacterial Air Filter Nonwovens Modified by Poly(Lactide) Microspheres Containing Triclosan, Fibers & Textiles In Eastern Europe. 2015;1(109):114–119.
  20. Gregor EC. Primer on Nonwoven Fabric Filtration Media, LLC Charlotte. 2003:1–6.
  21. Han X, Naeher LP. A review of traffic–related air pollution exposure assessment studies in the developing world. Environ Int. 2006;V32(1):106–120.
  22. Harrison RM, Jin JX. Particulate matter in the atmosphere: which particle properties are important for its effects on health. Sci Total Environ. 2000;V249(1–3):85–101.
  23. Hassan MA, Yeom BY, Wilkie A. Fabrication of nanofiber melt–blown membranes and their filtration properties, J Member Sci 2013;V427:336–344.
  24. Huang X, Jiao T, Liu Q. Hierarchical electrospun nano–fibers treated by solvent vapor annealing as air filtration mat for high–efficiency PM2. 5 Sci China Mater. 2019;V62:423–436.
  25. Hutten IM. Handbook of nonwoven filter media, 1st Oxford: Butterworth– Heinemann. 2007.
  26. Ibrahim HM, Saad MM, Aly NM. Preparation of Single–Layer Non–woven Fabric Treated with Chitosan Nano–particles and Its Utilization in Gas Filtration. International Journal of ChemTech Research. 2016;V9(6):01–16.
  27. Jeong S, Cho H and Han S. High efficiency, transparent, reusable, and active PM 2.5 filters by hierarchical Ag nanowire percolation network. Nano Lett. 2017;V17:4339–4346.
  28. Jones AP. Indoor air quality and health. Atmos Environ. 1999;V33:4535–4564.
  29. Kadam VV, Wang L, Padhye R. Electrospun nano–fiber materials to filter air pollutants – A review. Journal of Industrial Textiles. 2018;47(8):2253–2280.
  30. Kampa M, Castanas E Human health effects of air pollution. Environ Pollut. 2008;V151(2):362–367.
  31. Ko FK, Wan Y. Introduction to nanofiber materials. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2014.
  32. Kosikowska M, Biziuk M. Review of the determination of pesticide residues in ambient air. Trac Trends Anal Chem. 2010;V29:064–1072.
  33. Leibold H, Doeffert I, Leiber T, et al. The Application of Hepa filter units in the gas stream in high dust concentrations. International Atomic Energy Agency. 1993;V25(5).
  34. Li P, Wang C, Zhang Y. Air filtration in the free molecular flow regime: a review of high–efficiency particulate air filters based on carbon nanotubes. Small. 2014;V10(22):4543–4561.
  35. Linder P. Air Filters for Use at Nuclear Facilities, International Atomic Energy Agency by IAEA (Austria). 1970;Technical Reports Series No.122:12–16.
  36. Liu B, Zhang S, Wang X, et al. Efficient and reusable polyamide nano–fiber/nets membrane with bimodal structures for air filtration. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 2015;V457(1):203–211.
  37. Liu G, Xiao M. A review of air filtration technologies for sustainable and healthy building ventilation. Sustainable Cities and Society. 2017;V32:375–396.
  38. Liu L, Wang S. The development and applications of air Filter. Filter & Separator. 2000;10:-8–9.
  39. Lv D, Zhu M, Jiang Z. Green electrospun nanofibers and their application in air filtration. Macromol Mater Eng. 2018;V303(12):1800336.
  40. Maliszewska–Kordybach B. Sources, concentrations, fate, and effects of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in the environment. Part A: PAHs in air. Polish J Environ Stud. 1999;V8(3):131–136.
  41. Nel A. Air pollution–related illness: effects of particles. Science. 2015;V308:804–806.
  42. Nifuku M, Zhou Y, Kisiel A. Charging characteristics for electret filter materials. J Electrost. 2001;51(1):200–205.
  43. NIOSH (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health). Guidance for Filtration and Air–Cleaning Systems to Protect Building Environments from Airborne Chemical, Biological, or Radiological Attacks, Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, (NIOSH Publications Dissemination 4676 Columbia Parkway Cincinnati, OH). 2013, 136.
  44. Podgo rski A, Balazy A, Gradon L. Application of nanofibers to improve the filtration efficiency of the most penetrating aerosol particles in fibrous filters. Chem Eng Sci. 2006;V61(20):6804–6815.
  45. Pope CA, Dockery DW. Health effects of fine particulate air pollution: Lines that connect. J Air Waste Manage Assoc. 2006;V56(6):709–742.
  46. Poudyal A, Beckermann GW, Chand NA. Electrospun Nanofibre Filter Media: New Emergent Technologies and Market Perspectives. In: Filtering Media by Electrospinning, Springer. 2018:197–224.
  47. Qiu H, Tian L, Ho K. Air pollution and mortality: Effect modification by personal characteristics and the specific cause of death in a case–only study. Environ Pollut. 2015;V199:192–197.
  48. Rehman G, Ain QT, Zaheer M. An Analysis of Two–Dimensional Flow Through a Water Reservoir Using Mathematical Approach. Environ Contam Rev. 2019;V2(1):11–13.
  49. Sakpal PP, Landage SM, Wasif AI. Application of Nonwovens for Water Filtration, International Journal of Advanced Research in Management and Social Sciences. 2013;V2(2):28–47.
  50. Saleh SS. Performance of Air Filter fabrics Produced From Scrim Woven and Nonwoven fabrics, Journal of American Science. 2012;V8(6):110–120.
  51. Shen Z, Han Y, Cao J. Characteristics of traffic–related emissions: A case study in roadside ambient air over Xi’an, China. Aerosol Air Qual Res. 2010;V10(3):292–300.
  52. Song J, Liu Z, Lia Z, Wu H. Continuous production and properties of multilevel nano–fiber air filters by blow spinning. RSC Adv. 2020;V10(33):19615–19620.
  53. Sundarrajan S, Tan KL, Lim SH. Electrospun nanofibers for air filtration applications. Procedia Eng 2014;V75:159–163.
  54. Tharewal PG, Landage SM, Wasif AI. Application of Nonwovens for Air Filtration. International Journal of Advanced Research in IT and Engineering. 2013;V2(2):14–36.
  55. Van Turnhout J, Adamse JWC, Hoeneveld WJ. Electret filters for high–efficiency air cleaning. J Electrost. 1980;V8(4):369–379.
  56. Wang H, Yang ZY. Research on the advantages of the nano–fibrous air filtration membrane. Key Engineering Materials. 2016:474–476.
  57. Wang L, Kang Y. b–Cyclodextrin based air filter for high–efficiency filtration of pollution sources, J Hazard Mater. 2019;V373:197–203.
  58. Wang Y, Ying Q, Hu J. Spatial and temporal variations of six criteria air pollutants in 31 provincial capital cities in China during 2013–2014. Environ Int. 2014;V73:413–422.
  59. Wang Z, Pan Z. Preparation of hierarchical structured nano–sized/porous poly (lactic acid) composite fibrous membranes for air filtration. Appl Surf Sci. 2015;V356:1168–1179.
  60. Wang Z, Wang TC. Ceramic Ultrafiltration and Nano–filtration Membrane for Removal of Black Carbon Ink, Blue Dye Ink, Fe3+ and Cu2+ Ions from Water. Zhejiang Tian Cheng Environmental Technology Co. Ltd. 2020.
  61. Wang Z, Zhang JS. Characterization and performance evaluation of a full–scale activated carbon–based dynamic botanical air filtration system for improving indoor air quality. Building and Environment. 2011;V46(3):758–768.
  62. Xiao H, Song Y, Chen G. Correlation between charge decay and solvent effect for melt–blown polypropylene electret filter fabrics, J Electrost. 2014;V72(4):311–314.
  63. Xu J, Liu C, Hsu PC. Roll–to–roll transfer of electrospun nanofiber film for high–efficiency transparent air filter, Nano Lett. 2016;V16(2):1270–1275.
  64. Xue J, Wu T, Dai Y. Electrospinning and electrospun nanofibers: methods, materials, and applications, Chem Rev. 2019;V119(8):5298–5415.
  65. Yu BF, Hu ZB, Liu M. Review of research on air–conditioning systems and indoor air quality control for human health. Int J Refri 2009;V32:3–20.
  66. Zhang R, Liu B, Yang A. In situ investigation on the nanoscale capture and evolution of aerosols on nanofibers, Nano Lett. 2018;V18(2):1130–1138.
  67. Zhang R, Liu C, Hsu PC. Nanofiber air filters with high–temperature stability for efficient PM 2.5 removal from the pollution sources. Nano Lett. 2016;V16(6):3642–3649.
Creative Commons Attribution License

©2022 Mohammed, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.