Submit manuscript...
MOJ
eISSN: 2475-5494

Women's Health

Research Article Volume 8 Issue 2

Maternal outcome following uterine rupture and its associated factors among mothers who delivered at Felege-hiwot referral hospital, Amhara-Ethiopia

Alemtsehay Wesson,1 Enyew Assefa2

1Department of Midwifery, Wollo University, Ethiopia
2Department of Statistics, Wollo University, Ethiopia

Correspondence: Enyew Assefa, Department of Statistics, Wollo University, Dessie, Ethiopia

Received: November 16, 2018 | Published: March 26, 2019

Citation: Wesson A, Assefa E. Maternal outcome following uterine rupture and its associated factors among mothers who delivered at Felege-hiwot referral hospital, Amhara-Ethiopia. MOJ Womens Health. 2019;8(2):143-148. DOI: 10.15406/mojwh.2019.08.00226

Download PDF

Abstract

Background: Ruptured uterus is one of the major causes of maternal and prenatal morbidities and mortalities in developing countries, particularly in Africa. Ethiopia is one of developing countries where maternal and prenatal mortalities are still high. The major objective of this study was to determine maternal outcomes of uterine rupture and its associated factors.

Methods: The study design was facility based retrospective cross-sectional study from all mothers who visit from Sep, 1/2011 – Aug, 31/2015 at Felege-hiwot referral hospital delivery room for delivery service with ruptured uterus was conducted in the study. A total of 312 cases were enrolled in the study. The table, graph and binary logistic regression was found to be more appropriate for analyzing the data.

Result: More than 39% mothers had severe complication. The common complication was severe anemia 24.4% followed by severe shock 14.7%. There were also 2.7% maternal deaths. The binary logistic regression model showed that incidence and its complication of uterine rupture in this study were remarkably high. Antenatal care visit, duration of labor and admission to laparotomy time and hospital stay had strong association with maternal outcome.

Conclusion: improving access to antenatal care, proper monitoring of labor and early referral of high risk patients will contribute to the reduction of unfavorable maternal outcome.

Keywords: uterine rupture, maternal outcome, felege-hiwot referral hospital, nonsurgical, binary, complications

Introduction

Uterine rupture refers to the complete nonsurgical disruption of all uterine layers (endometrium, myometrium, and serosa). There are two type of rupture; complete rupture involves the whole thickness of uterine wall and incomplete rupture occurs when serosa remain intact. Rupture of gravid uterus occurs during the course of labor, intra-partum and post-partum. But in some cases it can occur during pregnancy without labor.1 Sign and symptoms of uterine rupture depend on timing, site and extent of uterine defect. Those are fetal distress, cessation of contractions, abdominal tenderness, abdominal distension, palpable fetal parts, shock and vaginal bleeding. Site of rupture can be anterior, lateral, posterior, fundal or combination of two or more of those. And also it can be extended to adjacent structures like cervix, vagina and/or both.2 Rupture of uterus also associated with maternal morbidities such as severe hemorrhage, bladder rupture, foot drop, psychological trauma, fistula and anemia and sterilized due to surgical intervention of hysterectomy, maternal death, non-reassuring fetal status and stillbirth.3

Related to pregnancy and child birth every day approximately 830 women die from preventable causes. Ninety nine percent of all maternal death occurs in developing countries. Although from 1990 to 2015 maternal mortality worldwide dropped by about 44%, maternal mortality ratio in developing country is still high. In which Maternal mortality ratio in Worldwide is 303 per 100,000 live births, in developing country 239 per 100,000 live births, Africa 542 per 100,000 live births and in developed country 12 per 100,000 live births.4 Study done on Maternal and newborn outcomes following uterine rupture shows that among the 347 uterine rupture cases severe outcome was occurred in 86(25%) of cases. Maternal age and inter-delivery interval <18 months were factors associated with severe outcome of uterine rupture.5

A five year retrospective study conducted at Christian Hospital in Nigerian in 2007, found a rupture rate of 14.6 per 1,000 births. Forty percent (28/70) of these cases of rupture occurred in unscarred uterus. Of those 3 (10.7%) cases of uterine rupture occurred in women who were not in labor. The mean duration of labor was 25±25.3. Place of laboring in TBA homes and prolonged labor were factors associated with uterine rupture (Kelechi N. et al. 2013).

A case control study was done to determine risk factors for ruptured uterus at mulago hospital kampala, uganda. The result shows that, factors associated with uterine rupture were low socio-economic status, aged 20-29 years, distance more than 10km from hospital, history of prolonged labor, previously delivered by Caesarean section, non-attendance of antenatal care, patient with referral paper, babies weighing more than 3,500gm and testing HIV positive.6

Retrospective cross sectional study done in Mizan Aman General Hospital Ethiopia from 2015 found that, there were a total of 8,509 hospital deliveries and 136 uterine rupture cases with incidence rate of 1.6% or 1 in 89 deliveries. Factors associated with maternal outcome of uterine rupture were hemoglobin level, shock before operation, ANC follow up, blood transfusion and re-laparotomy done.7 A study done in Tanzania showed that Subtotal hysterectomy was performed in 120 (73.6%) cases while Repair with BTL was done in 20 (12.3%) and repair without BTL was done in 20 (12.3%) cases. There were 21 maternal deaths and 157 prenatal deaths giving case fatality rates of 12.9% and 96.3%, respectively. Major obstetric hemorrhage 34.4 % was the commonest maternal complication and all patients had blood transfusion. Other complications were sepsis 17.5%, vesico-vaginal fistula 6.2% and minor bladder injuries 3.3 %.8

Study conducted in Sudan in 2010 found that 69.7% of cases were management by repair of the uterus and 12.1% repair with BTL. Subtotal hysterectomy was performed in 12.1% and total hysterectomy constituted 6.1%. Common complications were severe blood loss that necessitated blood transfusion in 18.2% of cases, critical ill that needed ICU in 81.8% cases, bladder injury in 36.4% of cases, hysterectomy in 18.2% of cases, postoperative hyperpyrexia in 12.1% of cases and wound infection constituted 6.1% of cases.9

Prospective Study done at Debre Marekose hospital found that Operation time ranges from 40-150 minutes with average of 77 minutes. Admission to laparotomy time was from 2-10 hours. Total abdominal Hysterectomy was performed for 77.1% of cases followed by repair with or without BTL 18.6% and subtotal abdominal hysterectomy for 4.3% of cases. In 58.6% of cases blood was transfused and average duration of hospital stay was 10 days. The case fatality rate was 21.4% (15/70).10 Study done in Adigrat hospital reported that at admission 51(95.4%) had signs of uterine rupture and while in 3 (5.6%) rupture occurred in hospital. Fifty three percent was transfused with blood, 16.7% had postoperative wound infection and 12.5% had vesico vaginal fistula. Maternal case fatality rate was 11.1% and fetal case fatality rate was 98.1%. Ruptured uterus contributed 24% of all causes of maternal deaths in the hospital within the study period.11

The underlying factors for rupture include delay in seeking appropriate care at the onset of labor, a poor or non-existent referral system, non-attendance of antenatal care and delayed interventions due to a combination of factors especially the lack of skilled human resources and medical consumables.12 The occurrence of uterine rupture varies in different parts of the world. It is rare in high-income countries in which the risk of maternal death due to uterine rupture is 0-1%. But it remains a public health problem in low income countries, particularly in Africa, Case fatality rates ranges between 1- 13% and about 75% of cases of uterine rupture occurred in women with an unscarred uterus following obstructed labor .13 In Ethiopia maternal mortality is 353 per 100,000 live births and Majority of maternal deaths take place during childbirth and the immediate postpartum period. The top four causes of maternal mortality were obstructed labor/uterine rupture 36% followed by hemorrhage, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and sepsis/infection.13,14 However there was paucity of information on factors associated with maternal outcome of uterine rupture in Ethiopia and there was no study conducted in the study area. Therefore, this study was aimed at determining maternal outcome of uterine rupture and its associated factors at Felege-hiwot referral hospital during the study period.

Methods and materials

Study area

The study was conducted in Bahir-Dar administration city. It is the capital city of Amhara national regional state (ANRS), which is located about 565 km northwest of Addis Ababa. The city has one referral hospital, one district hospital, ten health centers, ten health posts, two private hospitals, and higher clinics. Among private institution only two hospitals and two nongovernmental clinics are providing delivery. Felege-hiwot referral hospital is the only governmental referral hospital in the city. The hospital gives service for an estimated of 7 million people from Bahir-Dar city, East and west Gojjam, Awi ,south and north Gondor zones and Metekel zone of Benshangul Gumuz regional state with different in- patient and out-patient wards. Felege-hiwot referral hospital has seven wards with 627 professional and 161 administrative staffs. Specifically the hospital has its’ own well equipped maternity ward which possesses around 60 beds for serving different activities. In the hospital, on average there are about 6500 women delivered on each physical year.15

Study design and data collection

 In this study facility based retrospective cross-sectional study design was conducted. All mothers who visit Felege-hiwot referral hospital delivery room for delivery service with ruptured uterus from September, 1/2011–August, 31/2015 was conducted in the study. There were 375 mothers admitted and managed for uterine rupture in the 5 years of study period but only 312(83.2%) mothers were complete information and we collected the data from these women while the remaining 63(16.8%) women were incomplete information and we were excluded these mothers from the study.

Study variables

The response variable of this study was maternal outcome of uterine rupture (favorable outcome or unfavorable outcome uterine rupture). Explanatory variables expected to associate maternal outcome of uterine rupture were age, address, antenatal care follow up, duration of labor, occurrence of the rupture, admission to laparotomy time, duration of the procedure, type of rupture and hospital stay. Working definitions of these socio-demographic and obstetrical explanatory descriptions are provided in the Appendix 1.

No.

Variable

Categories

1

Age

0=<18 years (younger mothers)

1=19-35years (adult mothers)

2=≥35 years (older mothers)

2

Address

0=Rural

1=Urban

3

ANC follow up

0=No

1=Yes

4

Duration of labor

0=≥24 hours

1=<24 hours

5

Occurrence of the rupture

0=Out of hospital

1=At hospital

6

Admission to laparotomy time

0=≥40 minutes

1= <40 minutes

7

Duration of the procedure

0=≥120minutes

1=<120 minutes

8

Type of rupture

0=LUS with extension to adjacent organs

1=Lateral

2=Posterior

3=Lower uterine segment

9

Hospital stay

0=≥8 days

1=<8 days

Appendix 1 Defintion and categories of working explanatory variables

Operational definitions

Uterine rupture: defined as complete or incomplete nonsurgical disruption of uterine layers (endometrium, myometrium, and serosa) diagnosed and confirmed after laparotomy.

Unfavorable outcome: A mother who had one or more of the following complication: Who had severe shock, severe anemia (hemoglobin level <7gm/dl), transfused ≥3 units of blood, having fistula, re-laparotomy done, hysterectomy without having alive child, maternal death.

Data processing and analysis

Data collection format were checked for completeness, coded and entered in to EPI INFO version 3.5.2 statistical software and then transported to SPSS windows version 20 for further analysis. Errors related to inconsistency of data was checked and corrected during data cleaning. Descriptive statistics such as percentages, frequency distributions and appropriate graphic presentation were used for describing the data. Binary logistic regression was used to assess association and strength of association between explanatory factors and outcome variable. In the study Hosmer- Lemeshow test and Likelihood ratio test were used to assess the goodness of fit of the model. If p-value for the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit test was greater than 0.05, we would not reject the null hypothesis that there was no difference between observed and model predicted values, implying that the model estimates were adequate to fit the data at an acceptable level.16

Result

Distribution of unfavorable maternal outcome

The common complication for unfavorable maternal outcome of uterine rupture was anemia (97.4%) and 24.4% had severe anemia. While blood transfusion was given to 73.1% and 9.9% of cases transfused more than three units of blood. Another causes considered as influencing the unfavorable maternal outcome of uterine rupture was vesico-vaginal fistula (7.7%). In addition, 14.7% of mothers had severe shock. There were also 2.7% maternal deaths. Re-laparotomy was done for 7.4% outcome of uterine rupture cases (Table 1).

Post-operative complication

Frequency N=312

Percent

Anemia

304

97.4

Severe anemia

76

24.4

Blood transfused

228

73.1

Transfusion more than three units

31

9.9

Vesico-vaginal fistula

24

7.7

Severe shock

46

14.7

Surgical site infection

21

6.7

Re-laparotomy done

23

7.4

Maternal death

10

2.7

Table 1 Distribution of unfavorable Outcome of uterine rupture at Felege-hiwot referral hospital

Outcome of uterine rupture across socio-demographic and obstetrical factors

The total number of women covered in the study was 312. Among these, 39.7% unfavorable maternal outcome of uterine rupture      and also 81.5% resided in rural areas. The majority 62.1% unfavorable maternal outcome of uterine rupture were in the adult mothers (19-35years). With regard to antenatal care follow up, 41.1% no antenatal cares follow up were unfavorable outcome of uterine rupture. Another variable considered was duration of labor during delivery. Accordingly, approximately half (49.2%) of unfavorable outcome of uterine rupture had greater than 24 hour’s duration of labor during delivery. Similarly, more than half (54%) proportion of unfavorable outcome of uterine rupture was ≥40 minutes taken to laparotomy. The highest (91.1%) proportion of unfavorable outcome of uterine rupture was occurred before arriving at hospital. The frequent site for unfavorable outcome of uterine rupture was lateral rupture (35.5%) followed by lower uterine segment (33.9%) (Table3). Regarding to the type of surgical intervention total abdominal hysterectomy was performed for 66% of cases followed by uterine rupture without BTL (15.1%). While 5.1% had bladder rupture and repaired successfully (Figure 1).

Figure 1 Type of surgical intervention at Felege-hiwot referral hospital.

Model analysis of maternal outcome of uterine rupture

Binary logistic analysis was done to assess association between maternal outcome of uterine rupture variable and explanatory variables. The explanatory variables in the model were women’s age , address, antenatal care follow up, duration of labor, occurrence of the rupture ,admission to laparotomy time, duration of the procedure, type of rupture and hospital stay.

Model fitting

Hosmer and Lemeshow test was used to assess a goodness of fit test of the null hypothesis that the model adequately fits the data, since the value of the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test statistic significance value was greater than 0.05 (i.e.0.652>0.05), we fail to reject the null hypothesis that there was no difference between observed data and model-predicted values, implying that the model fitted the data at an acceptable level, this proved that the predicted data were not significantly different from the observed data (Table 2). Consider the model which included all predictors. Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients had given Chi-Square value of 12.065 which was significant at 5% level of significant. Since our omnibus test was significant we can concluded that adding the predictors to the model had significantly increased our ability to predict maternal outcome of uterine rupture (Table 2).

Hosmer and Lemeshow Test

Step

Chi-square

df

Sig

1

0

0

.

2

0.204

1

0.652

Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients

1

Step

7.048

1

0.008

Block

7.048

1

0.008

Model

7.048

1

0.008

2

Step

5.017

2

0.081

Block

12.065

3

0.007

Model

12.065

3

0.007

Table 2 Hosmer and Lemeshow Test, and Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients

Factors associated with maternal outcome of uterine rupture

The result of fitted model showed that the outcome of uterine rupture mothers who had labor duration during delivery more than 24 hour had 2.89 times unfavorable outcome than those uterine rupture mothers who had labor duration less than 24 hour while holding all other variables in the model constant. The model also revealed that antenatal care follow up had a statistically significant impact on maternal outcome of uterine rupture. Mothers who had not attended antenatal care follow up had 2.62 times unfavorable outcome than those mothers who had antenatal care follow up while holding all other variables in the model constant. Mothers who were managed with laparotomy after 40 minutes of diagnosis had 2.34 times more likely to had unfavorable outcome than those mothers who were managed with laparotomy within 40 minutes of diagnosis. The uterine rupture mothers who came from urban were 1.15 times unfavorable outcome compared to that of the mothers who came from rural area. With regarding to the age of mothers the fitted model showed that adult mothers had a significant influence on the unfavorable maternal outcome of uterine rupture. Also mothers who were stay greater than or equal to eight days in the hospital had 4.48 times unfavorable outcome than that of mothers who stay less than eight days in the hospital while holding all other variables in the model constant (Table 3).

Variable

Maternal outcome

COR (95% CI)

AOR(95% CI)

p-value

Unfavorable N=124(%)

Favorable N=188(%)

Age

<18 years

11(8.9)

9(4.8)

2.27(1.28,3.93)

2.50(0.74,8.87)

0.082

19-35years

77(62.1)

143(76.0)

1.85(1.08,3.18)

1.61(0.80,3.26)

0.024*

≥35 years

36(19.0)

36(19.2)

1

1

Address

Rural

101(81.5)

124(65.9)

2.27(1.31,3.90)

1.15(0.54,2.48)

0.03*

Urban

23(18.5)

64(34.1)

1

1

ANC follow up

No

51(41.1)

45(23.9)

2.22(1.36-3.62)

2.62(1.40,4.91)

0.01*

Yes

73(58.9)

143(76.1)

1

1

Duration of labor

≥24 hours

61(49.2)

45(23.9)

3.07(1.89,5.00)

2.89(2.55,5.37)

0.001*

<24 hours

63(50.8)

143(76.1)

1

1

Occurrence of rupture

Out of hospital

113(91.1)

179(95.2)

0.51(0.22,1.28)

0.97(0.28,3.34)

0.15

At hospital

11(8.9)

9(4.8)

1

1

Admission to laparotomy time

≥40 minutes

67(54.0)

73(38.9)

1.85(1.17,2.93)

2.34(1.28,4.26)

0.009*

<40 minutes

57(46.0)

115(61.1)

1

1

Duration of the procedure

≥120minutes

25(20.1)

27(14.4)

1.5(0.88,2.71)

1.7(0.76,3.79)

0.18

<120 minutes

99(79.9)

161(85.6)

1

1

Type of rupture

LUS with extension to adjacent organs

29(23.4)

30(16.0)

1.97(1.01,3.74)

1.27(0.56,2.88)

0.34

Lateral

44(35.5)

56(29.8)

1.6(0.93,2.76)

1.06(0.50,2.29)

0.85

Posterior

9(7.2)

16(8.5)

1.15(0.47,2.82)

1(0.31,3.20)

0.75

Lower uterine segment

42(33.9)

86(45.7)

1

1

Hospital stay

≥8 days

66(53.2)

46(24.5)

3.51(2.16-5.70)

4.48(2.40,8.34)

0.001*

<8 days

58(46.8)

142(75.5)

1

1

Table 3 Fitted model of maternal outcome of uterine rupture at Felege-hiwot Referral Hospital

Discussion

Rupture of the gravid uterus is catastrophic obstetric complication that is associated with high maternal and prenatal mortality rates particularly in developing countries. In this study, there were excesses unfavorable outcome uterine rupture cases. The leading cause of unfavorable outcome was anemia 97.4%, about 73 % of cases transfused with blood and severe shock 14.7%. This was slightly higher when compared to studies done in Mizan Aman Ethiopia 93% had anemia and 51.3% transfused with blood.7 The result of this study also indicated that there were 2.7% maternal deaths. Which was lower than in Adigrat Ethiopia (Gessessew A. 2002), Debre Marekose Ethiopia10 and Tanzania8 were 11.1%, 21.4% and 12.9% respectively, probably this difference in maternal outcome reflects difference in quality of maternal health care providers and availability of emergency care services in different countries. According to result of this study uterine rupture mothers who had labor duration more than 24 hour had more likely to had unfavorable outcome than those uterine rupture mothers who had labor duration less than 24 hour. The probable reason might be the possibility of obstruction which leads to further exhaustion and highly exposure to infection which leads to further complication. This finding is consistent with the finding by.1,6

Mothers who had not attended antenatal care follow up had unfavorable outcome than those mothers who had antenatal care follow up. The probable reason might be those mothers with no antenatal care follow up had lack of information about danger signs of pregnancy and they might delay to go to health facilities and they were not supplemented with iron during pregnancy so the severity of anemia would be high. This finding was agreed with studies conducted in Mizan Aman Ethiopia.6,12,6 Mothers who were managed with laparotomy after 40 minutes of diagnosis had more likely to had unfavorable outcome than those mothers who were managed with laparotomy within 40 minutes of diagnosis. The probable reason might be once the uterus ruptured the bleeding might be continued until the bleeding sight was secured by surgical intervention. So if the time gap increases the mother might deteriorate. This study also revealed that the unfavorable outcome was higher for mothers aged 19-35years (adult mothers) than mothers in the other age groups. Which was similar finding studied by.6,5

Conclusion

The incidence and its complication of uterine rupture were remarkably high. Important causative factors were cephalopelvic disproportion, mal-presentation, in general neglected or obstructed labor was the commonest cause. According to the finding of this study antenatal care follow up, duration of labor, admission to laparotomy time, address of mothers and hospital stay were important predictors of maternal outcome.

Recommendation

Assigning a responsible person on this referral hospital, who can assess the gap of obstetric problems daily, address feedbacks for referral cases and reporting for responsible person. The staff should be well-equipped and organized to manage these emergency obstetric complications quickly including blood transfusion, laparotomy and resuscitation measures. Improving labor follow up with parthograph and timely decision for cesarean sections of abnormal labor.

Efforts need to be intensified to work together to break geographical and cultural barriers which could result in unnecessary dalliance of the community in seeking and reaching care in the health facility and they should also make proper community mobilization and education to increase awareness of the society towards antenatal care and delivery at health institution. Prospective studies focusing on the determinants factors of this obstetric problem which is helpful in designing interventional activities targeted at improving institutional delivery service utilization, intrapartal close follow up of labor and early referral of high risk mothers.

Acknowledgments

None.

Conflicts of interest

The author declares there are no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Kelechi N Eguzo1, Chisara C. Umezurike. Rupture of unscarred uterus: a multi–year cross–sectional study from Nigerian Christian Hospital. Nigeria: Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2013;2(4):657–660.
  2. Kenneth J, Judis S, et al. Obstetrics complication’s William’s obstetrics. 23rd ed. New York: McGraw–Hill Company; 2011. 325 p.
  3. Ipyana Hudson. Five year retrospective analysis of the cause, complication, fetomaternal out come Tanzania. Muhimbili University of health and allied science. 2009.
  4. Traiend in maternal mortality 1990–2015 estimates developed by WHO,UNICEF,UNFPA and World Bank. Jeneva: World Health Organization. 2015. 286 p.
  5. Barger MK, et al. Severe maternal and prenatal outcomes from uterine rupture among women at term with a trial of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;184(7):1576–1581.
  6. Kampala I. Prevalence, predisposing factors and outcomes Ruptured uterus. Uganda: Singapore Med J. 2010;51(1):35–38.
  7. Mengestie Habtamu, et al. Maternal and Perinatal Outcomes of Uterine Rupture Patients among Mothers who Delivered at Mizan Aman General Hospital, SNNPR, South West Ethiopia. MOJ Womens health. 2016;2(1):13–23.
  8. Hussein K, Ipyana M, Jos van R. Uterine rupture: a retrospective analysis of causes, complications and management outcomes at Muhimbili National Hospital in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Journal of Health Research. 2012;14(3):220–225.
  9. Mohamed A, Ahmed M, Ghayda E, et al. Rupture Uterus in Sudanese Women: Management and Maternal complication. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2010;4(4): 1669–1675.
  10. Admassu A. Analysis of uterine rupture in debre markose hospital. MD East African Medical Journal. 2004;81(1):53–55.
  11. Gessessew A MM. Ruptured uterus-eight year retrospective analysis of causes and management outcome in Adigrat Hospital, Tigray Region, Ethiopia. Ethiop J Health Dev. 2002;16(3):241–245.
  12. Ezechi OC M, Obiesie LO. Rupture uterus in south east Nigeria a reappraisal. Singapore Med J. 2004;45(3):113–116.
  13. Trends in maternal mortality 1990 to 2008. Estimates developed by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA and the world bank. Geneva: WHO Press; 2010.55 p.
  14. Yifru Berhan AB. Cause of maternal mortality in Ethiopia: a significant decline in abortion related death. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2014; 24 Suppl:15–28.
  15. Felegehiwot Referal Hospital annual report. 2015.
  16. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied Logisitc Regression. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2000. 397 p.
Creative Commons Attribution License

©2019 Wesson, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.