Submit manuscript...
MOJ
eISSN: 2475-5494

Women's Health

Mini Review Volume 4 Issue 1

Epigenetic and birth

Jovita Ortiz, Daniela Paredes, Rodrigo Neir, Pablo Galvez

Department of Health Promotion of Women and Newborn, University of Chile, Chile

Correspondence:  Jovita Ortiz, Department of Health Promotion of Women and Newborn, Midwifery School, Faculty of Medicine, University of Chile, Independencia 1027, Independencia, Santiago, Metropolitan Region, Chile, Tel 56966188760

Received: September 16, 2016 | Published: January 2, 2017

Citation: Ortiz J, Paredes D, Neira R, et al. Epigenetic and birth. MOJ Womens Health. 2017;4(1):1-2. DOI: 10.15406/mojwh.2017.04.00072

Download PDF

Abstract

Epigenetics refers to the study of how genes express their phenotypic effect, all of which can be modified by the environment. Recently, pregnancy, labour and birth have been proposed as critical periods of exposure to environmental or external factors and interventions that could cause epigenetic changes in an individual, determining their potential for a healthy life. In this mini review, exposure to exogenous oxytocin during labour and also during caesarean delivery is posed as epigenetic modifiers, and their potential impact on the health of an individual is reviewed.

Keywords: epigenetic; birth; caesarean section; oxytocin

Introduction

Epigenetics has been described as one of the mechanisms regulating fetal adaptation to the environment,1 modulating gene expression, either repressing or activating the expression of genes without changing the DNA, which is potentially transmissible to future generations.2 Knowledge of epigenetic modifications could explain how the intrauterine environment influences adult health. In a hypothetical exercise, this allows to relate not only pregnancy, but the type of delivery and birth environment as periods that could expose a woman and her child to such modifications, regardless of its duration.3 Thus interventions performed during labor, may be associated with activation of epigenetic mechanisms that alter gene expression of an individual conditioning its potential healthy or disease-free life.4 One of these interventions is the use of exogenous oxytocin during labor and in caesarean delivery, which have increased significantly in many countries.5–7

In 2013, Dalhen et al.,6 published the Epigenetic Hypothesis of Birth, which proposes that when labor occurs naturally, physiological stress processes are stimulated in the fetus, which determine physiological epigenetic expressions that would trigger their immune response as well as genes involved in weight regulation and tumour suppression or rather in suppressing exaggerated cell replication.3 Meanwhile, the use of exogenous oxytocin has been associated with deregulation of these processes and changes in perinatal linkage,8,9 delay in the onset of lactation,10 increased postpartum post-traumatic stress9 and development of bio-behavioural disorders in autism spectrum and attention deficits;11,12 It is postulated that the oxytocin receptor gene may undergo epigenetic modifications responsible for these changes.3,4,12 On the other hand, caesarean delivery has been associated with impaired immune response13 and possible alterations associated with deregulation of stress processes that are part of normal delivery and absence of exposure to bacterial vaginal flora.3,4 All this is conditioned by abnormal epigenetic modulations of the genes involved in these processes.

Conclusion

Considering the recently raised issues, it is fundamental that health professionals reconsider the use of procedures such as pharmacological stimulation or reinforcement of labor, cesarean birth, or any event with the power to condition dysregulation of physiological process of eu-stress of labor, because it could be related to modifications of normal, potentially transgenerationally transmissible gene expression and whose impact in the medium and short term is not possible to measure in today's society.

Acknowledgements

None.

Conflict of interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Odom LN, Taylor HS. Environmental induction of the fetal epigenome. Expert Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2010;5(6):657–664.
  2. Berger SL, Kouzarides T, Shiekhattar R, Shilatifard A. An operational definition of epigenetics. Genes Dev. 2009;23(7):781–783.
  3. Dahlen HG, Kennedy HP, Anderson CM, et al. The EPIIC hypothesis: Intrapartum effects on the neonatal epigenome and consequent health outcomes. Medical hypotheses. 2013;80(5):656–662.
  4. Dahlen HG, Downe S, Wright ML, et al. Childbirth and consequent atopic disease: emerging evidence on epigenetic effects based on the hygiene and EPIIC hypotheses. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2016;16:4.
  5. Hyde MJ, Mostyn A, Modi N, et al. Las consecuencias para la salud del nacimiento por cesárea. Biological Reviews. 2012;87(1):229–243.
  6. Buchanan SL, Patterson JA, Roberts CL, et al. Tendencias y morbilidad asociadas con el uso de oxitocina durante el parto en nulíparas a término. ANZJOG. 2012;52(2):173–178.
  7. Binfa L, Pantoja L, Ortiz J, et al. Midwifery practice and maternity services: A multisite descriptive study in Latin America and the Caribbean. Midwifery. 2016;40:218–225.
  8. Brunton PJ, Russell JA. The expectant brain: adapting for motherhood. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008;9(1):11–25.
  9. Olff M, Frijling JL, Kubzansky LD, et al. The role of oxytocin in social bonding, stress regulation and mental health: an update on the moderating effects of context and interindividual differences. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2013;38(9):1883–1894.
  10. Marín Gabriel MA, Olza Fernández I, Malalana Martínez AM, et al. Intrapartum Synthetic Oxytocin Reduce the Expression of Primitive Reflexes Associated with Breastfeeding. Breastfeeding Medicine. 2015;10(4):209–213
  11. Kurth L, Haussmann R. Perinatal Pitocin as an early ADHD biomarker: neurodevelopmental risk? J Atten Disord. 2011;15(5):423–431.
  12. Gregory SG, Connelly JJ, Towers AJ, et al. Genomic and epigenetic evidence for oxytocin receptor deficiency in autism. BMC Med. 2009;7:62.
  13. Azad MB, Konya T, Maughan H, et al. Gut microbiota of healthy Canadian infants: profiles by mode of delivery and infant diet at 4 months. CMAJ. 2013;185(5):385–394.
Creative Commons Attribution License

©2017 Ortiz, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.