Submit manuscript...
MOJ
eISSN: 2379-6294

Toxicology

Research Article Volume 4 Issue 2

Health risk assessment of selected heavy metals in gari (cassava flake) sold in some major markets in yenagoa metropolis, Nigeria

Sylvester C Izah, Lovet T Kigigha, Priscilla Nyenke

Department of Biological Sciences, Niger Delta University, Nigeria

Correspondence: Sylvester C Izah, Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, Niger Delta University, Wilberforce Island, Bayelsa State, Nigeria, Tel +2347 0301 9246 6

Received: December 22, 2017 | Published: March 7, 2018

Citation: Kigigha LT, Nyenke P, Izah SC. Health risk assessment of selected heavy metals in gari (cassava flake) sold in some major markets in yenagoa metropolis, Nigeria. MOJ Toxicol. 2018;4(2):47–52. DOI: 10.15406/mojt.2018.04.00089

Download PDF

Abstract

Gari (cassava flake) is a major staple food in Nigeria. It’s also a major source of energy food to several families. This study evaluated the health risk assessment of selected heavy metals in gari sold in some major markets in Yenagoa metropolis, Nigeria. Triplicate gari sample were obtained from four different markets in Yenagoa metropolis, Nigeria. The samples were ashed, digested and analyzed using atomic adsorption spectrophotometer. Health risk assessment was carried out using target hazard quotient, health risk index and daily intake index. Result revealed that the heavy metals concentration ranged from 1.32–3.81 mg/kg (manganese), 2.21–5.66 mg/kg (zinc), 1.00–3.72 mg/kg (copper) and 11.16-38.75 mg/kg (iron). There was significant difference (P<0.05) in each of the heavy metals among the various locations. The target hazard quotient and health risk index values were <1. This indicates no potential health risk of the studied heavy metals in the gari among the population under study.

Keywords: gari, health risk assessment, heavy metals, human health effects

Introduction

Cassava is a major source of staple food to several families in tropical Africa Emurotu et al.1 especially in Nigeria that is the largest producing nation in the world Izah et al.,2–10 Izah & Ohimain,11 Ohimain et al.12 Cassava cultivation and processing is carried out predominantly by smallholder in Nigeria. According to Kigigha et al.13 cassava cultivation, processing and marketing of its associated products is a major source of livelihood to several families especially in rural setting in Nigeria. Cassava is a typical carbohydrate food crop. Kigigha et al.13 Ukwuru & Egbonu.14 is with the opinion that cassava meals provide energy for over 2 billion people in the tropical regions. Cassava is typically used as food in the form of gari, lafun and fufu, livestock feeds, confectionaries, sweeteners production Adebayo-Oyetoro et al.,15 additives to several pasteries such as bread cookies, biscuits and rolls, doughnut, cakes, flakes etc especially in private house hold level Emurotu et al.1 Beside food, cassava have also found application in several sector including glues, textiles, pharmaceuticals Adebayo-Oyetoro et al.15 and bioethanol production Ukwuru & Egbonu et al.14 Cassava is a tuber crop that is propagated by stem.16–19According to Izah & Aigberua,20 cassava matures between 6–12 months of planting depending on the variety. The authors further reported that the utilization rate of cassava vary according to the income size and source of income of the farmer especially in the rural area. As such some individuals still harvest their cassava between 12 – 24 months of planting Izah & Aigberua.20

Cassava requires essential nutrients for optimum productivity. Some of the elements are required in trace amount. Some of these heavy metals that are required by cassava at trace concentration include nickel, chromium, zinc, copper, manganese, iron etc. While some others such as cadmium, lead, arsenic, mercury etc do not have any known biological function and as such its presence in biodiversity depicts contamination/ toxicity. Like most plants, cassava has the tendency to bioaccumulate heavy metals in their various parts from the environment and thus can transfer to the food chain. Some heavy metals enters the environment (surface/ ground water, soils etc) through human/anthropogenic activities such as industrial and agricultural activities, mining, transportation, waste disposal etc Seiyaboh & Izah,21 Ben-Eledo et al.22 Izah et al.23 Izah & Angaye,24 Izah & Aigberua.25 Adejoh.26 Heavy metals are also from natural earth’s crust Khan et al.27

Heavy metals contamination of the environment and food materials are major source of concern. In human, heavy metals are up taken through consumption of heavy metal laden food, water and inhalation of heavy metal contaminated air. Information about food consumed is invaluable for estimating the suitability of intakes of essential nutrients and assessing exposure risks of heavy metals Moremi et al.28 As such, food safety is a major global concern Khan et al.27 Specifically, health risk assessment of heavy metals in food of a given population is a good technique because it provides useful information about any threat regarding heavy metals contamination in a given food samples Khan et al.27 Therefore, this study aimed at assessing health risk assessment of selected heavy metals in gari (cassava flake) sold in some major markets in Yenagoa Metropolis, Nigeria.

Materials and methods

Study area

Bayelsa State is one of the Niger Delta states. Yenagoa is the state capital of Baylesa state. The region is characterized by high water table/ level and multiple flooding events that typically occur between May and late October annually. Yenagoa is one of the fast developing city with few industries and several business activities.29,30 Some notable food crops such as gari that is consumed in Yenagoa metropolis comes from neighboring states such as Delta and Rivers states. Typically the Niger Delta region area is characterized by temperature of 24–37 ºC and relative humidity of 50–95% all year round.31–34

Sample collection

Triplicate samples of red gari were purchased from four major markets in Yenagoa metropolis viz: Etegwe Junction, Agudam-Epie, Akenfa and Igbogene market. The samples were packaged in sterile Ziploc bag and transported to the laboratory for analysis.

Sample preparation and Heavy metal analysis

The gari samples were oven dried at 105 ºC to constant minimum moisture content for 6 hours. Then the samples were dry-ashed in a muffle furnace at 450 ºC. The ashed sample was digested using nitric and hydrochloric acid. The digested samples were analyzed at varying wavelength of 213.9nm, 324.70nm, 248.3nm, 279.5nm and 357.90nm for zinc, copper, iron, manganese and chromium respectively using Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer (Model: GBC Avanta PM A6600).

Health risk assessment

Health risk assessment has been widely applied in studies related to human health. Some of the notable indices used for health risk assessment include target hazard quotients, total-target hazard quotient, health risk index and daily intake of metal estimated daily intake Wang et al.35–48

Daily intake of metals

Daily intake of metals has been widely calculated by authors using the equation 1 Iwegbue et al.43 Orisakwe et al.;45 Chen et al.46

DIM = C metal  x  D intake of food B Average body weight MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qadaWcaaWdaeaapeGaam4qa8aadaWgaaqaaKqzadWdbiaad2ga caWGLbGaamiDaiaadggacaWGSbaajuaGpaqabaWdbiaacckacaWG4b GaaiiOaiaadseal8aadaWgaaqcfayaaKqzadWdbiaadMgacaWGUbGa amiDaiaadggacaWGRbGaamyzaiaacckacaWGVbGaamOzaiaacckaca WGMbGaam4Baiaad+gacaWGKbaajuaGpaqabaaabaWdbiaadkeapaWa aSbaaeaajugWa8qacaWGbbGaamODaiaadwgacaWGYbGaamyyaiaadE gacaWGLbqcfaOaaiiOaiaadkgacaWGVbGaamizaiaadMhacaGGGcqc LbmacaWG3bGaamyzaiaadMgacaWGNbGaamiAaiaadshaaKqba+aabe aaaaaaaa@693E@ (1)

Where: Cmetal = concentration of heavy metal in the gari sample (mg/kg)

Dintake of food = daily intake of gari

The daily maximum intake of 800g for cassava meals was assumed for this study Hayford et al.;49 Zango et al.41 The daily intake of cassava was converted to kg/ person/ day) Osu et al.36

Health risk index

Health risk index is calculated by using daily intake of metals and the corresponding reference oral dose for each of the heavy metals under study. The health risk index has been calculated by authors based on equation 2 Osu et al.;36 Jan et al.50

HRI = DIM RfD MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qadaWcaaWdaeaapeGaaeiraiaabMeacaqGnbaapaqaa8qacaqG sbGaaeOzaiaabseaaaaaaa@3BDB@ (2)

DIM,Daily Intake of Metals for each of the heavy metals; RfD, oral reference dose for the heavy metals under study viz: copper (0.04), Manganese (0.14), iron (0.7), Zinc (0.3)

When the health risk index is <1, it pose no health effect but when the ratio is ≥ 1 it indicate that the population will experience health risk Osu et al.;36 Khan et al.27

Target hazard quotients

Target hazard quotient is one method of assessing lifelong exposure to heavy metals through diets Iwegbue et al.42; Ihedioha et al.47 Typically, target hazard quotients was developed by the United State Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for estimation of potential health risk associated with long term exposure to chemical pollutants (US EPA, 1989).51 The Target Hazard Quotients have been widely applied by authors Naughton & Petroczi.39,40 Iwegbue et al.,42 Ihedioha et al.;47 Wang et al.;35 Osu et al.;36 Chien et al.;37 Kigigha et al.13

Target Hazard Quotients = EF x ED x FIR x CHM RFD x BaW x AT  x  10 3 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qadaWcaaWdaeaapeGaaeyraiaabAeacaqGGcGaaeiEaiaabcka caqGfbGaaeiraiaabckacaqG4bGaaeiOaiaabAeacaqGjbGaaeOuai aabckacaqG4bGaaeiOaiaaboeacaqGibGaaeytaaWdaeaapeGaaeOu aiaabAeacaqGebGaaeiOaiaabIhacaqGGcGaaeOqaiaabggacaqGxb GaaeiOaiaabIhacaqGGcGaaeyqaiaabsfaaaGaaiiOaiaadIhacaGG GcGaaGymaiaaicdapaWaaWbaaeqabaqcLbmapeGaeyOeI0IaaG4maa aaaaa@5D79@ (3)

Where

  1. EF=the exposure frequency (365days/year) Osu et al.;36 Bennett et al.52
  2. ED=the exposure duration =70 years Osu et al.;36 Bennett et al.52
  3. FIR=Food ingestion rate
  4. CHM=concentration of heavy metal in the gari
  5. RfD=oral reference dose for the heavy metals under study were Copper (0.04), iron (0.7), Zinc (0.3), Manganese (0.14)
  6. BaW= body average weight for adult =70kg Abubakar et al.;44 Kigigha et al.13
  7. AT=average time for non-carcinogen (days) (365days/year) Ihedioha et al.;47 Osu et al.;36 Bennett et al.52

When the target hazard quotients is <1, it suggest no potential adverse effects Ihedioha et al.;47 Zhuang et al.;53 Osu et al.;36 Wang et al.;35 Kigigha et al.;13 Chien et al.37

Furthermore, the summation of the individual target hazard quotients for each of the metals is referred to as total Target Hazard Quotients.

Total Target Hazard Quotients = total hazard quotients of individual heavy metals under study  MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfa4aaubiae qabeqaaiaaygW7aeaaqaaaaaaaaaWdbiabggHiLdaacaWG0bGaam4B aiaadshacaWGHbGaamiBaiaacckacaWGObGaamyyaiaadQhacaWGHb GaamOCaiaadsgacaGGGcGaamyCaiaadwhacaWGVbGaamiDaiaadMga caWGLbGaamOBaiaadshacaWGZbGaaiiOaiaad+gacaWGMbGaaiiOai aadMgacaWGUbGaamizaiaadMgacaWG2bGaamyAaiaadsgacaWG1bGa amyyaiaadYgacaGGGcGaamiAaiaadwgacaWGHbGaamODaiaadMhaca GGGcGaamyBaiaadwgacaWG0bGaamyyaiaadYgacaWGZbGaaiiOaiaa dwhacaWGUbGaamizaiaadwgacaWGYbGaaiiOaiaadohacaWG0bGaam yDaiaadsgacaWG5bGaaiiOaaaa@7660@

Statistical analysis

Statistical Package for Social Sciences software version 20 was used for the statistical analysis. A one way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was carried out and significance variation was determined at P = 0.05 and Tukey Honestly Significance Difference was used to determine the source of the observed variation. Paleontological statistics software package by Hammer et al.54 was used to plot chart for the overall heavy metal concentration in the study. Standard error bar was determined at 95% interval level.

Results and discussion

Table 1 presents some selected heavy metal concentration in gari sold in some market in Yenagoa metropolis, Nigeria. While the correlation matrix of the heavy metals under study is presented in Table 2. Furthermore, chromium was not detected (viz: <0.001mg/kg) in the gari samples. The heavy metals concentration ranged from 1.32–3.81 mg/kg (manganese), 2.21–5.66 mg/kg (zinc), 1.00–3.72 mg/kg (copper) and 11.16- 38.75 mg/kg (iron). There was significant difference (P<0.05) among the various locations the samples were obtained for each of the heavy metals under study. Among the heavy metals under studied, manganese showed positive significant relationship with iron (r=0.853, P<0.01) while copper also showed positive significant correlation with iron (r=0.651, P<0.05) (Table 2). The significant variation (P<0.05) that exits among the gari samples from different markets under study could be due variation in the source viz: heavy metals concentration in the soil that the cassava tuber was cultivated. The heavy metals under study were in the order; chromium < copper <manganese < zinc < Iron (Figure 1). The trend in this study were slightly different from the trend of iron> manganese > zinc > copper reported in cassava tuber in Eleme Local Government Area of River state by Moremi et al. (2016). These heavy metals are essential nutrients required by the body at certain concentration. For instance, iron in the body play essential roles. The values reported in this study were close to the value of 12.08 – 28.80 mg/kg reported in cassava tuber in Eleme Local Government Area of River state by Moremi et al. (2016). But lower than the value of 557.03 mg/kg and 10542mg/kg reported in un-impacted and crude oil impacted soil in Ikot Ada Udo in Ikot Abasi Local Government Area of Akwa Ibom State Osu et al.36 The values in this study showed iron deficiency. This is a major source of concern considering the role of iron in diets. Some of the associated role of iron in the human body have been variously reported in literature by authors Izah et al.55 According to Moremi et al.28 the human body requires higher concentration of iron for several physiological functions compared to the amount required for other essential heavy metals. Diet low in iron could predispose the body to condition such as lead (Pb) toxicity. According to Moremi et al.28 deficiency of iron could enhance lead (which is neuro toxic) absorption in the body. The authors further reported that individuals with iron deficient can absorb more lead in their system up to 7 fold as the body responds to iron deficiency by dispatching increasing amounts of the iron transporter and Divalent Metal Transporter 1 into the gut.

Figure 1 Mean value of heavy metals in gari sold in some market in Yenagoa metropolis, Nigeria.

Location

Mn, mg/kg

Zn, mg/kg

Cu, mg/kg

Fe, mg/kg

Akenfa

2.85±0.36b

5.66±0.31c

1.00±0.06a

18.40±0.50ab

Agudama-Epie

3.81±0.46b

3.74±0.44b

3.72±0.87b

38.75±2.18c

Igbogene

1.32±0.12a

2.21±0.11a

1.46±0.24a

11.16±1.12a

Etegwe Junction

2.59±0.32ab

4.46±0.22bc

2.72±0.41ab

21.35±2.05b

Table 1 AHeavy metal concentration of some selected gari sold in some market in Yenagoa metropolis, Nigeria
Data is expressed as mean ± Standard Error; Different alphabets along the column indicate significant variation (P<0.05) according to Tukey Honestly Significance Difference.

Locations

Mn

Zn

Cu

Fe

Mn

1.000

 

 

 

Zn

0.469

1.000

 

 

Cu

0.340

-0.228

1.000

 

Fe

0.853**

0.350

0.651*

1.000

Table 2 Spearman rho correlation coefficient of the heavy metals under study
**Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
*Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

Heavy metals

Daily Intake of Metals

Health Risk Index

Target hazard quotients

Total-total hazard quotients

Iron

0.256

0.366

0.026

0.096

Manganese

0.030

0.216

0.015

Zinc

0.046

0.153

0.011

Copper

0.025

0.635

0.044

Chromium

NA

NA

NA

Table 3 Health Risk assessment of gari samples sold in some major markets in Yenagoa metropolis, Bayelsa state, Nigeria

The total concentration of Zinc in the gari sample was similar to the value of 3.20 - 6.59 mg/kg reported in cassava tuber in Eleme local government area of Rivers state Moremi et al.28 Also close to the value of 5.33 mg/kg in cassava from un-impacted soil and lower than the value of 22.30 in cassava tuber from crude oil impacted soil in Ikot Ada Udo in Ikot Abasi Local Government Area of Akwa Ibom State Osu et al.,36 Adejoh.26 reported that zinc play a vital role in the physiological and metabolic process in living organisms. Typically, zinc is as essential trace element that play essential role as an enzyme co-factor and its occurrence may weaken the chances of lead toxicity Moremi et al.28 Zinc also play essential role in the functioning of the immune system Adejoh.26 High concentration in the body could induce several health effects such as vomiting and gastrointestinal irritation (nausea, cramps, diarrhoea), weakness, anorexia, anaemia, diminished growth, loss of hair, lowered food utilization, changes in some liver, brain and kidney functions Izah et al.55 According to Adejoh.26 chronic elevation of zinc intake could lead to copper impairment in human.

The concentration of Copper in gari samples in the study area were slightly lower than the values of 0.87– 1.23mg/kg reported in cassava tuber is some locations in Eleme local government area of Rivers state Moremi et al.28 But higher than the value of 0.05 mg/kg in cassava tuber from un-impacted soil and lower than the value of 18 mg/kg in cassava tuber from crude oil impacted soil in Ikot Ada Udo in Ikot Abasi Local Government Area of Akwa Ibom State.36 Adejoh.26 reported that copper is an important metal required by the human body for mental and physical development which is up taken through vegetarian foods such as nuts, seeds and grains. High concentration of copper is diet is characterized by abdominal pains, diarrhoea, vomiting and metallic taste in the mouth.28 This is because copper could accumulate easily in the body. Hence, chronic low level intakes have damaging effects since there is no good mechanism for their elimination in the body.26 Furthermore, cirrhosis and other liver disease are some health condition associated with high copper ingestion through diets.28 Adejoh.26 further listed condition associated with increased copper concentration in the body to include arthritis, fatigue, insomnia, scoliosis, osteoporosis, heart disease, cancer, migraine, heart seizures, gum diseases, skin and hair problems.

The value of manganese concentration recorded in this study were lower than the value of 5.95 - 14.55 mg/kg reported in cassava tuber from some locations in Eleme Local Government Area of Rivers state as reported by Moremi et al.28 But similar to the value of 3.02 mg/kg in cassava tuber from un-impacted soil and lower than the value of 40.62 mg/kg in cassava tuber from crude oil impacted soil in Ikot Ada Udo in Ikot Abasi Local Government Area of Akwa Ibom State.36 Typically, manganese toxicity may impair central nervous system and cause progressive disorder of the extra pyramidal system Moremi et al.28 The daily intake of metals, health risk index, total hazard quotients of heavy metals associated with gari sold in some markets in Yenagoa metropolis, Bayelsa state is presented in Table 4. The daily intake were 0.256 (iron), 0.030 (manganese), 0.046 (zinc) and 0.025 (copper). Furthermore, the health risk index were 0.366 (iron), 0.216 (manganese), 0.153 (zinc) and 0.635 (copper), while Target hazard quotients were 0.026 (iron), 0.015 (manganese), 0.011 (zinc) and 0.044 (copper). These values were lower than the upper tolerable daily intake level viz: 45mg/day (iron), 11mg/day (manganese), 40mg/day (zinc) and 10 mg/day (copper) specified by the Institute of Medicine for adults (Institute of Medicine56). The findings of this study suggest no potential health risk of the assessed heavy metals for the individuals consuming gari samples in the study area. Typically, health risk index <1 is an indication of safe health risk while health risk index>1 suggest severe risk of the metals. Furthermore, target health quotients which is another tool used in assessing lifetime effect of an individual on human health were <1. Authors have reported that target hazard quotients <1 is an indication no obvious risk from the metals under study over a lifetime of exposure, total hazard quotient >1 suggest adverse effect Han et al.57 The low target hazard quotients value suggests low risk of long term carcinogenic effects.

Conclusion

Gari is a typical carbohydrate crops and consumed by several families in tropical Africa especially in Nigeria. This study assessed the health risk of selected heavy metals in gari sold in some major markets in Yenagoa metropolis, Bayelsa state, Nigeria. The study found that there was significant variation (P<0.05) among the heavy metals in the gari samples. Furthermore, Health risk assessment showed no potential health effect based on health risk index and target hazard quotients viz:<1 of the heavy metals under study.

Acknowledgements

None.

Conflict of interest

The authors there are not conflict of interest.

References

  1. Emurotu JE, Salehdeen UM, Ayeni OM. Assessment of heavy metals level in cassava flour sold in Anyigba Market Kogi State, Nigeria. Advances in Applied Science Research. 2012;3(5):2544–2548.
  2. Izah SC, Bassey SE, Ohimain EI. Ecological risk assessment of heavy metals in cassava mill effluents contaminated soil in a rural community in the Niger Delta Region of Nigeria. Molecular Soil Biology. 2017;8(3):21–31.
  3. Izah SC, Bassey SE, Ohimain EI. Amino acid and proximate composition of Saccharomyces cerevisiae biomass cultivated in Cassava mill effluents. Molecular Microbiology Research. 2017;7(3):20–29.
  4. Izah SC, Bassey SE, Ohimain EI. Assessment of heavy metal in cassava mill effluent contaminated soil in a rural community in the Niger Delta region of Nigeria. EC Pharmacology and Toxicology. 2017;4(5):186–201.
  5. Izah SC, Bassey SE, Ohimain EI. Assessment of pollution load indices of heavy metals in cassava mill effluents contaminated soil: a case study of small-scale cassava processing mills in a rural community of the Niger Delta region of Nigeria. Bioscience Methods, 2017;8(1):1–17.
  6. Izah SC, Bassey SE, Ohimain EI. Assessment of Some Selected Heavy Metals in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Biomass Produced from Cassava Mill Effluents. EC Microbiology 2017;12(5):213–223.
  7. Izah SC, Bassey SE, Ohimain EI. Changes in the treatment of some physico-chemical properties of cassava mill effluents using Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Toxics. 2017;5(4):28.
  8. Izah SC, Bassey SE, Ohimain EI. Cyanide and Macro-Nutrients Content of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Biomass Cultured in Cassava Mill Effluents. International Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2017;2(4):176–180.
  9. Izah SC, Bassey SE, Ohimain EI. Geo-accumulation index, enrichment factor and quantification of contamination of heavy metals in soil receiving cassava mill effluents in a rural community in the Niger Delta region of Nigeria. Molecular Soil Biology. 2017;8(2):7–20.
  10. Izah SC, Bassey SE, Ohimain EI. Removal of Heavy Metals in Cassava Mill Effluents with Saccharomyces cerevisiae isolated from Palm Wine. MOJ Toxicology. 2017;3(4):00057.
  11. Izah SC, Ohimain EI. Bioethanol production from cassava mill effluents supplemented with solid agricultural residues using bakers’ yeast [Saccharomyces cerevisiae]. Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques. 2015;3(1):47–54.
  12. Ohimain EI, Silas-Olu DI, Zipamoh JT. Biowastes generation by small scale cassava processing centres in Wilberforce Island, Bayelsa State, Nigeria. Greener Journal of Environmental Management and Public Safety. 2013;2 (1):51–59.
  13. Kigigha LT, Izah SC, Kpea TB. Microbiological quality of fermented Cassava Flakes (Gari) sold in Yenagoa, Metropolis, Nigeria. Bulletin of Advanced Scientific Research. 2015;01(07):157–160.
  14. Ukwuru MU, Egbonu SE. Recent development in cassava-based products research.  Academia Journal of Food Research. 2013;1(1):001–013.
  15. Adebayo-Oyetoro AO, Oyewole OB, Obadina AO, et al. Microbiological Safety Assessment of Fermented Cassava Flour ‘‘Lafun’’ Available in Ogun and Oyo States of Nigeria. International Journal of Food Science. 2013;1–5.
  16. Ohimain EI. The benefits and potential impacts of household cooking fuel substitution with bio-ethanol produced from cassava feedstock in Nigeria. Energy for Sustainable Development. 2012;16:352–362.
  17. Ohimain EI. Environmental impacts of smallholder ethanol production from cassava feedstock for the replacement of kerosene household cooking fuel in Nigeria. Energy Sources Part A: Recovery, Utilization and Environmental Effects. 2013;35:1–6.
  18. Ohimain EI. Energy analysis of small-scale ethanol production from cassava: a case study of the cassakero project in Nigeria. Journal of Technology Innovations in Renewable Energy. 2013b;2:119–129.
  19. Ohimain EI. Smallholder bioethanol production from cassava feedstock under rural Nigerian settings. Energy Sources Part B: Economics, Planning and Policy. 2015;10:233–240.
  20. Izah SC, Aigberua AO. Assessment of Microbial Quality of Cassava Mill Effluents Contaminated Soil in a Rural Community in the Niger Delta, Nigeria. EC Microbiology. 2017a;13(4):132–140.
  21. Seiyaboh EI, Izah SC. Review of Impact of Anthropogenic Activities in Surface Water Resources in the Niger Delta region of Nigeria: A case of Bayelsa state. International Journal of Ecotoxicology and Ecobiology. 2017;2(2):61–73.
  22. Ben-Eledo VN, Kigigha LT, Izah SC, et al. Water quality assessment of Epie creek in Yenagoa metropolis, Bayelsa state, Nigeria. Archives of Current Research International. 2017;8(2):1–24.
  23. Izah S, Chakrabarty N, Srivastav AL. A Review on Heavy Metal Concentration in Potable Water Sources in Nigeria: Human Health Effects and Mitigating Measures. Exposure and Health. 2016;8:285–304.
  24. Izah SC, Angaye TCN. Heavy metal concentration in fishes from surface water in Nigeria: Potential sources of pollutants and mitigation measures. Sky Journal of Biochemistry Research. 2016;5(4):31–47.
  25. Izah SC, Aigberua AO. Comparative Assessment of selected heavy metals in some common edible vegetables sold in Yenagoa metropolis, Nigeria. Journal of Biotechnology Research. 2017;3(8):66–71.
  26. Adejoh IP. Assessment of heavy metal contamination of soil and cassava plants within the vicinity of a cement factory in north central, Nigeria. Advances in Applied Science Research. 2016;7(3):20-27.
  27. Khan S, Farooq R, Shahbaz S, et al. Health Risk Assessment of Heavy Metals for Population via Consumption of Vegetables. World Applied Sciences Journal, 2009;6(12):1602–1606.
  28. Moremi OO, Horsfall Jnr M, Okorosaye-Orubite K, et al. Total Levels of Some Heavy Metals in Cassava Tuber from Eleme Local Government Area of Rivers State, Nigeria. Research Journal of Chemical Sciences, 2016;6(5):1–5.
  29. Izah SC, Angaye TCN, Ohimain EI. Climate change: some meteorological indicators and perception of farmers in Yenagoa metropolis, Bayelsa state, Nigeria. International Journal of Geology, Agriculture and Environmental Sciences. 2015;3(1):56–60.
  30. Kigigha LT, Ebieto LO, Izah SC. Health risk assessment of heavy metal in smoked Trachurus trachurus sold in Yenagoa, Bayelsa state, Nigeria. International Journal of Healthcare and Medical Sciences. 2017;3(9):62–69.
  31. Agedah EC, Ineyougha ER, Izah SC, et al. Enumeration of total heterotrophic bacteria and some physico-chemical characteristics of surface water used for drinking sources in Wilberforce Island, Nigeria. Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques. 2015;3(1):28–34.
  32. Ogamba EN, Izah SC, Toikumo BP. Water quality and levels of lead and mercury in Eichhornia crassipes from a tidal creek receiving abattoir effluent, in the Niger Delta, Nigeria. Continental Journal of Environmental Science. 2015;9(1):13–25.
  33. Seiyaboh EI, Izah SC, Oweibi S. Physico-chemical Characteristics of Sediment from Sagbama Creek, Nigeria. Biotechnological Research. 2017;3(1):25–28.
  34. Seiyaboh EI, Izah SC, Oweibi S. Assessment of Water quality from Sagbama Creek, Niger Delta, Nigeria. Biotechnol Res 2017;3(1):20–24.
  35. Wang X, Sato T, Xing B, et al. Health risks of heavy metals to the general public in Tianjin, China via consumption of vegetables and fish. Sci Total Environ. 2005;350(1–3):28–37.
  36. Osu SR, Solomon MM, Abai EJ, Et al. Human health risk assessment of heavy metals intake via cassava consumption from crude oil impacted soils with and without palm bunch ash additive. International Journal of Technical Research and Application. 2015;3(4):140–148.
  37. Chien LC, Hung TC, Choang KY, et al. Daily intake of TBT, Cu, Zn, Cd, and As for fishermen in Taiwan. Sci Total Environ. 2002;285:177–185.
  38. Jee PK, Bandyopadhyay DK, Chattopadhyay AP, et al.  Health Risk Assessment Of Heavy Metals For Population Health Via Consumption Of Vegetables Grown Around Dhapa, An Open Waste Dumping Site In Kolkata, India. International Journal of Scientific Research and Engineering Studies. 2016;3(6):52–57.
  39. Naughton DP, Petroczi A. Heavy metal ions in wines: meta-analysis of target hazard quotient reveals health risk. Chem Cent J. 2008a;2:22.
  40. Naughton DP, Petroczi A. The metal ion theory of ageing: dietary target hazard quotients beyond radicals. Immunity Ageing. 2008b;5:3.
  41. Zango MS, Anim-Gyampo M, Ampadu B. Health Risks of Heavy Metals in selected Food Crops cultivated in Small-scale Gold-mining Areas in Wassa-Amenfi-West District of Ghana. Journal of Natural Sciences Research. 2013;3(5):96–105.
  42. Iwegbue CMA, Nwozo SO, Overah CL, et al. Concentrations of Selected Metals In Some Ready-To-Eat-Foods Consumed in Southern Nigeria: Estimation of Dietary Intakes and Target Hazard Quotients. Turkish Journal, Agriculture - Food  Science and Technology. 2013;1(1):1–7.
  43. Iwegbue CMA, Bassey FI, Tesi GO, et al. Concentrations and health risk assessment of metals in chewing gums, peppermints and sweets in Nigeria. Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization. 2015;9:160–174.
  44. Abubakar A, Uzairu A, Ekwumemgbo PA, et al. Evaluation of heavy metals concentration in imported frozen fish Trachurus murphyi species sold in Zaria market, Nigeria. American Journal of Chemistry. 2014;4(5):137–154.
  45. Orisakwe OE, Nduka JK, Amadi CN, et al. Evaluation of Potential Dietary Toxicity of Heavy Metals of Vegetables. J Environment Analytic Toxicol 2012;2:136.
  46. Chen Y, Wu P, Shao Y, et al. Health risk assessment of heavy metals in vegetables grown around battery production area. Sci Agric. 2014;71(2):126–132.
  47. Ihedioha JN, Okoye CO, Onyechi UA. Health risk assessment of zinc, chromium and nickel from cow meat consumption in an urban Nigerian population. International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health, 2014;20(4):281–288.
  48. Lanre-Iyanda TY, Adekunle IM. Assessment of heavy metals and their estimated daily intakes from two commonly consumed foods (Kulikuli and Robo) found in Nigeria. Afr J Food Agric Nutr Develop. 2012;12(3):6156–6169.
  49. Hayford EK, Amin A, Osae EK, et al. Impact of Gold Mining on Soil and some Staple Foods Collected from Selected Mining Communities in and around Tarkwa-Prestea Area. West African Journal of Applied Ecology. 2009;14(1):1–12.
  50. Jan FA, Ishaq M, Khan S, et al. A comparative study of human health risks via consumption of food crops grown on wastewater irrigated soil (Peshawar) and relatively clean water irrigated soil (lower Dir). J Hazard Mater. 2010;179(1-3):612–621.
  51. US EPA. Guidance manual for assessing human health risks from chemically contaminated, fish and shellfish U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, 1989.
  52. Bennett DH, Kastenberg WE, McKoe TE. A multimedia multiple pathway risk assessment of atrazine: the impact of age differentiated exposure including joint uncertainty and variability. Reliability Engineering and System Safety. 1999;63:185–198.
  53. Zhuang P, McBride MB, Xia H, et al. Health risk from heavy metals via consumption of food crops in the vicinity of Dabaoshan mine, South China. Sci Total Environ. 2009;407:1551–1561.
  54. Hammer O, Harper DAT, Ryan PD. PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica. 2001;4(1):p. 1–9.
  55. Izah SC, Inyang IR, Angaye TCN, et al. A review of heavy metal concentration and potential health implications in beverages consumed in Nigeria. Toxics. 2017;5(1):1–15.
  56. Institute of Medicine. Dietary Reference Intakes for Vitamin A, Vitamin K, Arsenic, Boron, Chromium, Copper, Iodine, Iron, Manganese, Molybdenum, Nickel, Silicon, Vanadium, and Zinc. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press;2001.
  57. Han BC, Jeng WL, Chen RY, et al. Estimation of target hazard quotients and potential health risks for metals by consumption of seafood in Taiwan. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 1998;35(4):711–720.
Creative Commons Attribution License

©2018 Kigigha, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.