Submit manuscript...
MOJ
eISSN: 2574-9722

Biology and Medicine

Literature Review Volume 9 Issue 4

Streptococcus iniae: an emerging foodborne pathogen: a mini review

Mahendra Pal,1 Tesfaye Rebuma,2 Vikas Waskar,3 Judit Molnar4

1Narayan Consultancy on Veterinary Public Health, Gujarat, India
2Shaggar City administration, Sebeta Sub-City Agricultural office, Oromia, Ethiopia
3Department of Veterinary Public Health and Epidemiology, KNP College of Veterinary Science, Maharashtra, India
4Department of Water Management and Natural Ecosystems, Hungary

Correspondence: Prof. Dr. Mahendra Pal, Founder Director of Narayan Consultancy on Veterinary Public Health and Microbiology, Gujarat, India, Tel 9426085328, Tel Tel 9426085328

Received: December 10, 2024 | Published: December 27, 2024

Citation: Pal M, Rebuma T, Waskar V, et al. Streptococcus iniae: an emerging foodborne pathogen: a mini review. MOJ Biol Med. 2024;9(4):139‒141. DOI: 10.15406/mojbm.2024.09.00230

Download PDF

Abstract

Emerging zoonotic pathogens are important causes of morbidity and mortality both in humans as well as in animals and are reported in developing and developed nations. Streptococcus iniae is an emerging zoonotic pathogen primarily affecting aquaculture, causing significant morbidity and economic losses in farmed fish worldwide. This bacterium, which thrives in stressed and densely stocked aquaculture environments, has zoonotic potential, particularly for those handling or preparing infected fish. The source of infection is exogenous and ingestion is considered the main mode of transmission. Human infections, while sporadic, can result in serious conditions like bacteremia, meningitis, and endocarditis. Laboratory help is required to confirm an unequivocal diagnosis of disease. We recommend biosecurity in aquaculture, public education on safe handling, and alternative disease control strategies to mitigate risks. Current research highlights the need for sustainable management, exploring options like vaccination and plant-based antimicrobials to reduce antibiotic resistance and improve public and aquatic health.

Keywords bacterial infection, fish, foodborne zoonosis, public health, streptococcus iniae, zoonotic pathoge

Introduction

There are several species of Streptococcus including Streptococcus iniae, S. agalactiae, S. dysgalactiae, S. ictalurid, S. pyogenese, S. suis, and S. canis which are implicated in the etiology of streptococcosis.1–5 Among these, Streptococcus iniae emerged as a significant pathogen for both wild and farmed fish during the 1990s and 2000s, posing serious risks to global aquaculture and human health.1,6 This Gram-positive bacterium can infect a variety of freshwater and marine species, such as Oreochromis niloticus, Lates calcarifer, Amazon catfish, Acipenser baerii, and Oncorhynchus mykiss.7,8 Human diseases caused by these zoonotic bacteria are linked to handling and preparing contaminated fish. The first report of infections in humans was recorded in 1996.9 In 2000, Streptococcus iniae was identified at the International Conference on New Infectious Diseases as a new zoonotic pathogen spread by food animals.10 Despite being rare, Streptococcus iniae infections in humans are still being reported and in 2009, additional cases were discovered.11

The disease is characterized by enteritis,12 generalized septicemia, and meningoencephalitis, 13 and causes a high mortality rate of about 50%.14 In recent years, Streptococcus iniae has become one of the most important fish pathogens, causing hundreds of millions in losses to aquaculture every year.15 In addition, Streptococcus iniae is also considered a zoonotic pathogen like other Streptococcus spp., especially for people with low immunity or associated with processing fresh fish.16 In humans, Streptococcus iniae infection often causes bacteremic cellulitis, which subsequently leads to serious complications including arthritis, meningitis, endocarditis, and osteomyelitis.17 Therefore the objective of this paper is to present a critical review of Streptococcus iniae, as an emerging foodborne pathogen of public health concern.

Literature review

Etiology

Streptococcus iniae, a Gram-positive, facultatively anaerobic bacterium, is a significant pathogen in aquaculture, responsible for severe infections in freshwater and marine fish, such as tilapia and trout. Originally isolated from a freshwater dolphin in the Amazon, Streptococcus iniae has become widespread, causing high morbidity and mortality in aquaculture settings. Its transmission is often linked to environmental factors, including handling stress and overcrowded conditions, which are common in aquaculture environments.18 The bacteria's pathogenicity relies on various virulence factors. One of its primary defenses is a polysaccharide capsule, which protects it from host immune cells by preventing phagocytosis. Furthermore, Streptococcus iniae produces enzymes, such as streptolysin S, which damage host cells and support tissue invasion.19 Additionally, the bacterium has specialized adhesion proteins that facilitate attachment to host tissues, a critical step in infection initiation. Genome analysis of Streptococcus iniae reveals genetic diversity among isolates, which may explain variations in pathogenicity and immune responses across different fish species.20

Pathogenesis

The pathogenesis of S. iniae, an emerging zoonotic pathogen primarily affecting fish and occasionally causing infections in humans, involves complex mechanisms that facilitate host invasion, immune evasion, and tissue damage. One critical aspect of Streptococcus iniae pathogenicity is its capsule, which impairs phagocytic clearance by the host immune cells, allowing it to evade early immune responses. This enables the bacterium to establish infections effectively in host tissues.18 Additionally, Streptococcus iniae possesses specialized secretion systems, particularly the type VII secretion system (T7SS), found in various pathogenic Firmicutes. The T7SS in Streptococcus iniae facilitates the secretion of virulence factors that help in colonizing host tissues and competing with other microbial populations in the fish host, which is essential for its survival and proliferation within the host environment.21 Moreover, specific genomic regions within Streptococcus iniae, such as the plasticity zone (PZ-I), contain genes encoding hypothetical proteins and enzymes that potentially support nutrient acquisition and adaptability within various host tissues, thus enhancing its pathogenic capabilities.22 In human cases, the pathogen generally enters through skin abrasions, often due to handling infected fish, leading to soft tissue infections or even systemic diseases. Streptococcus iniae M-like protein and other surface proteins are instrumental in adhering to host cells and resisting immune responses, making it a formidable pathogen in both aquaculture and, occasionally, in human health contexts.23        

Geographic distribution

Streptococcal disease occurs in all continents (Americas, Asia, Europe, Africa, and Australia). There have been reports of thousands of Streptococcus species worldwide, including S. parauberis, S. suis, S. iniae, S. agalactiae, Lactococcus garvieae, S. dysgalactiae, S. pyogenese, and Varococcus salmoninarum.1,4,5 It is generally assumed that streptococcosis has a worldwide distribution, having been described in fish from Europe, the Americas, the Middle East, throughout Asia, and Australia.1,24–25 Streptococcus iniae has, to date, mainly been reported in North America, the Caribbean, parts of Asia (e.g., Japan, China, Singapore, Taiwan), Australia, and the Middle East.26

Risk factors

The risk factors for Streptococcus iniae infections primarily stem from conditions in aquaculture that facilitate bacterial spread, such as high stocking densities, handling stress, and inadequate water quality control. Stress and crowded conditions weaken fish immunity, making them more susceptible to infections.18 Moreover, antibiotic overuse in aquaculture as a control measure can contribute to antibiotic resistance in S. iniae, complicating treatment and potentially transferring resistance to other bacterial pathogens within the ecosystem. Antibiotic resistance is a growing concern due to its effects on both fish health and broader environmental and human health impacts.19 Consequently, reliance on antibiotics is being questioned, and alternative solutions, such as vaccination and the use of plant-based antimicrobials, are being explored for sustainable management of S. iniae in aquaculture systems.20

Transmission

The main ways that Streptococcus iniae can infect humans are through contaminated fish contact or by consuming undercooked fish items. Cross-contamination during food preparation and handling is another risk factor for the spread of foodborne illness.1 Streptococcus iniae can spread from fish to fish through carrier fish,27 and since fish with obvious disease symptoms are seldom sold, these carriers may be the origin of human infection. When fresh fish is prepared from wet markets, soft tissue injuries typically cause bacteremic cellulitis of the hand, which is followed by more than one of the following conditions: endocarditis, meningitis, arthritis, sepsis, pneumonia, osteomyelitis, and toxic shock.28 Streptococcus iniae is becoming more linked to human exposure through seafood eating because it grows well in aquatic habitats, especially in intensive aquaculture systems. Human interaction is more likely when the bacteria are present in fish farms, particularly as aquaculture production rises.29

Clinical signs

Streptococcus iniae is a zoonotic pathogen that causes cellulitis and bacteremia in humans.9,30 Septic progression of infection can result in endocarditis, meningitis, arthritis, pneumonia, toxic shock, and osteomyelitis.9,30–31 Manipulation of these organisms can cause soft tissue injuries through which the bacteria enter, leading to bacteremic cellulitis in the hand and other more serious conditions, such as endocarditis, meningitis, arthritis, sepsis, pneumonia, osteomyelitis, lymphangitis, bloodstream infection, and toxic shock.10 While human infection may be opportunistic,1 it has been associated with recent handling and preparation of infected fresh fish and disease has occurred in various locations worldwide.30,32 Cases have been primarily reported in North America, the Middle East, the Asian-Pacific region, and Asia.33

Prevention and control

Public education on proper fish handling, thorough cooking, and aquaculture biosecurity measures is vital for preventing Streptococcus iniae infections. Regular monitoring and quality control in aquaculture can further reduce zoonotic transmission risks.34,35

Conclusion and recommendations

Streptococcus iniae poses a growing threat to both aquaculture and human health due to its zoonotic potential and its significant economic impact on fish farming. With infections affecting multiple fish species and transmission risks to humans during the handling and preparation of fish, Streptococcus iniae represents a critical pathogen. Effective management requires understanding its pathogenic mechanisms, geographic prevalence, and risk factors within aquaculture environments. To reduce Streptococcus iniae infections, rigorous biosecurity practices in aquaculture should be implemented, including proper stocking densities and water quality monitoring. Public education on safe fish handling, thorough cooking, and avoiding raw or undercooked fish is crucial to prevent human infections. Further research on alternative treatments, such as vaccines and plant-based antimicrobials, can provide sustainable control measures, addressing both infection rates in aquaculture and reducing potential antibiotic resistance risks.

Acknowledgments

None.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Agnew W, Barnes AC. Streptococcus iniae: an aquatic pathogen of global veterinary significance and a challenging candidate for reliable vaccination. Vet Microbiol. 2007;122(1–2):1–15.
  2. Galpérine T, Cazorla C, Blanchard E, et al. Streptococcus canis infections in humans: retrospective study of 54 patients. J Infect. 2007;55(1):23–26.
  3. Pal M. Zoonoses. Satyam Publishers, Jaipur, India. 2nd 2007.
  4. Pal M. Streptococcus pyogenese: a remerging bacterial pathogen of major public health concern. Acta Scientific Microbiology. 2018;1(8):32–33.
  5. Pal M, Savalia CV. Streptococcus suis: an emerging and re-emerging pathogen of public health importance. Clinical Biotechnology and Microbiology. 2019;3:607–609.
  6. Yin L, Liang C, Wei W, et al. The antibacterial activity of thymol against drug-resistant Streptococcus iniae and its protective effect on channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus). Front Microbiol. 2022;13:914868.
  7. Khang PV, Nha VV, Nguyen NH. Resistance to Streptococcus iniae and its genetic associations with traits of economic importance in Asian seabass (Lates calcarifer). J Fish Dis. 2019; 42(12):1657–1666.
  8. Daneshamouz S, Haghi F, Zeighami H. Detection and identification of bacterial pathogens in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) samples from fish farms in Iran. Thalassas: An International Journal of Marine Sciences. 2020;36:133–141.
  9. Weinstein MR, Litt M, Kertesz DA, et al. Invasive infections due to a fish pathogen, Streptococcus iniae. N Engl J Med. 1997;337(9):589–594.
  10. Hansen GR, Woodall J, Brown C, et al. Emerging zoonotic diseases. Emerg Infect Dis. 2001;7(3):537.
  11. Koh TH, Sng LH, Yuen SM, et al. Streptococcal cellulitis following preparation of fresh raw seafood. Zoonoses Public Health. 2009;56(4):206–208.
  12. Piamsomboon P, Tanpichai P, Wongtavatchai J. Enteritis associated with subclinical infection of Streptococcus iniae in juvenile Asian seabass lates calcarifer (Bloch, 1790). J Fish Dis. 2021;44(11):1879–1882.
  13. Chen CY, Chao CB, Bowser RR. Comparative histopathology of Streptococcus iniae and Streptococcus agalactiae-infected tilapia. Bulletin of the European Association of Fish Pathologists. 2007;27(1):1–8.
  14. Rahmatullah M, Ariff M, Kahieshesfandiari M, et al. Isolation and pathogenicity of Streptococcus iniae in cultured red hybrid tilapia in Malaysia. J Aquat Anim Health. 2017;29(4):208–213.
  15. Chen M, Li LP, Wang R, et al. PCR detection and PFGE genotype analyses of streptococcal clinical isolates from tilapia in China. Vet Microbiol. 2012;159(3–4):526–530.
  16. Lim JW, Jo YH, Choi JS, et al. Antibacterial activities of prenylated isoflavones from Maclura tricuspidata against fish pathogenic Streptococcus: their structure-activity relationships and extraction optimization. Molecules. 2021;26(24):7451.
  17. Fulde M, Weigand PV. Epidemiology and pathogenicity of zoonotic streptococci. Host-pathogen interactions in streptococcal diseases. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2012;29:49–81.
  18. Xu H, Zhu N, Chen Y, et al. Pathogenicity of Streptococcus iniae causing mass mortalities of yellow catfish (Tachysurus fulvidraco) and its induced host immune response. Front Microbiol. 2024;15:1374688.
  19. Ting HT, LiPing LL, Rui WR. Biochemistry and gene polymorphism analysis of Streptococcus iniae strains isolated from Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus and Trachitus ovatus in Guangxi province. Genome Announcements. 2014:459–462.
  20. Gong HY, Wu SH, Chen CY, et al. Complete genome sequence of Streptococcus iniae 89353, a virulent strain isolated from diseased tilapia in Taiwan. Genome Announc. 2017;5(4):e01524–16.
  21. Xu H, Liu F. Advances in chemokines of teleost fish species. Aquaculture and Fisheries. 2023;9(2):115–125.
  22. Zhang C, Xu YX, Qi QR. Comparative analysis reveals pathogenic plasticity zones in S. iniae. Oncotarget. 2022;13:194–210.
  23. Sun Y, Zhang MC, Liu Q. Immune evasion mechanisms in fish and zoonotic pathogens. Frontiers Immunology. 2023;10:229–232.
  24. Chou L, Griffin MJ, Fraites T, et al. Phenotypic and genotypic heterogeneity among Streptococcus iniae isolates recovered from cultured and wild fish in North America, Central America and the Caribbean islands. J Aquat Anim Health. 2014;26(4):263–271.
  25. Shoemaker CA, Xu D, Soto E. Streptococcus iniae and S. agalactiae. Fish viruses and bacteria: pathobiology and protection. 2017:298–313.
  26. Institute for international cooperation in animal biologics, IOWA state university. 2020.
  27. Zlotkin A, Hershko H, Eldar A. Possible transmission of Streptococcus iniae from wild fish to cultured marine fish. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998;64(10):4065–4067.
  28. Sun JR, Yan JC, Yeh CY, et al. Invasive infection with Streptococcus iniae in Taiwan. J Med Microbiol. 2007;56(9):1246–1249.
  29. Shoemaker CA, Klesius PH. Streptococcus iniae: a review of an emerging aquatic pathogen. Journal of Aquatic Animal Health. 1997;9(3):177–183.
  30. Song Z, Yue R, Sun Y, et al. Fatal bacterial septicemia in a bottlenose dolphin Tursiops truncatus caused by Streptococcus iniae. Dis Aquat Organ. 2017;122(3):195–203.
  31. Lau SKP, Woo PCY, Tse H, et al. Invasive Streptococcus iniae infections outside North America. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41(3):1004–1009.
  32. Goh SH, Driedger D, Gillett S, et al. Streptococcus iniae, a human and animal pathogen: specific identification by the chaperonin 60 gene identification method. J Clin Microbiol. 1998;36(7):2164–2166.
  33. Kirmaier A, Blackshear L, Lee MSL, et al. Cellulitis and bacteremia caused by the fish pathogen, streptococcus iniae, in an immunocompromised patient: case report and mini-review of zoonotic disease, lab identification, and antimicrobial susceptibility. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2024;108(4):116189.
  34. Toranzo AE, Magariños B, Romalde JL. A review of the main bacterial fish diseases in mariculture systems. Aquaculture. 2005;246(1–4):37–61.
  35. Bibi F, Qaisrani SN, Ahmad AN, et al. Occurrence of salmonella in freshwater fishes: a review. Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences. 2015;25(3):303–310.
Creative Commons Attribution License

©2024 Pal, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.