Submit manuscript...
MOJ
eISSN: 2574-9722

Biology and Medicine

Research Article Volume 8 Issue 4

Preliminary investigation of phytoplankton composition of Ibeno River, Ibeno, Akwa Ibom state, Nigeria 

Denise EM,1 Ekpenyong DS,1 Bassey EA,1 Akoma SO2

1Department of Botany and Ecoloogical Studies, Faculty of Science University of Uyo, Nigeria
2Department of Botany and Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Benson Idahosa University, Nigeria

Correspondence: Denise EM, Department of Botany and Ecoloogical Studies, Faculty of Science, University of Uyo, Nigeria

Received: October 01, 2023 | Published: October 18, 2023

Citation: Denise EM, Ekpenyong DS, Bassey EA, et al. Preliminary investigation of phytoplankton composition of Ibeno River, Ibeno, Akwa Ibom state, Nigeria. MOJ Biol Med. 2023;8(4):149-151. DOI: 10.15406/mojbm.2023.08.00201

Download PDF

Abstract

Ibeno estuary is a mangrove belt which occupies a larger part of the Atlantic waistline of more than 129km and this study was carried out in a period of 4months to identify the phytoplankton (which are the bases of the aquatic food web) community. The phytoplankton were sampled using Standard methods. The study showed 52 species of phytoplankton belonging to 4 division. The result obtained followed regular pattern as reported for water bodies and falls within acceptable data of highly productive.

Keywords: analysis, akwa, phytoplankton composition, Ibeno river

Introduction

Phytoplankton are autotrophic (self-feeding) components of the aquatic plant community and a key part of Ocean freshwater.1 Phytoplankton came from the greek word (phyton) meaning “plant” and plankton meaning “wander’ or “drifter”. It therefore means in literal term, phytoplankton are plants that wander or are drifted by water current. They form the base of marine and freshwater food webs and are key players in the global carbon cycle.2 Marine phytoplankton algae are terms used in referring to tiny aquatic plants, appearing as unicellular, colonial or filamentous forms which have no opposition to water currents and are usually drifty or hanging in the open water.1

Phytoplankton conserve as toxins or medicine for their consumers, depending upon the identity of their parasite. According to Zaccaroni and Scaravelli (2008), toxins are produced by two algal group, dinoflagellates and diatoms representing 2% of known phytoplankton species (60-80 species out of 3400-4000) and can reach human directly (via consumption). Most toxins are neurotoxins with stable temperature that cannot be ameliorated by working.

Phytoplanktons are also vital water quality indicators due to their short life cycles, and ability to respond to environmental changes, hence their standing crop and species composition reflects the quality heath.3 They constitute the starting point of energy transfer and are highly sensitive to allochthonously imposed changes to the environment Khattak et al., Microalgae can be feasibly measured irrespective of their microscopic nature. They are regarded as a relevant ecological tool in freshwater analysis and their distribution has a great deal of impact on the health of any water body Denise et al., Ibeno river is one of the water bodies in Akwa Ibom state of Nigeria providing nursery and breeding grounds for fish species and other aquatic fauna. The river has great potential for fish / seafood sales, tourist attraction and aesthetic values. The estuary is one of the richest in land fisheries resources in Nigeria contributing one of the highest quotas of fish production of 90% Nigeria’s total marine /brackish water output comes from this estuary.

Material and methods

Study location

The study was carried out at Ibeno town situated on the eastern side of the kwa ibo river about 3km from the river month, and is one of the largest fishing settlements on the Nigeria west, lying in the mangrove forest belt of the Niger Delta region of Nigeria. It is bounded in the West Eastern Obolo Local Government Area, to the north by Onna, Esit Eket and Eket to the south by the Atlantic Ocean (Nigeria fisheries and aquaculture department, 2011). Ibeno occupies the largest Atlantic coastline of more than 129km in Akwa Ibom State and has regular rain fall almost throughout the year with the peak between May and September. The Ibeno shore line marine water is mostly as a result of the high sediments loads of fine mineral, particles absorbing light in the blue range of the spectrum which causes the water to be brownish. The very dark brown coloration of the Ibeno near column marine can be attributed to the dark color of putrefactive effective of decaying / decayed tropical floral / fauna that often inundates most of the streams and riverside area, which finally drains into the near shore water of Ibeno Essien et al.

Phytoplankton identification

Phytoplankton identification and enumeration were done in laboratory. Five drops of each concentrated sample (10ml) were examined x 400 magnifications after mounting on a glass slide and covering with a cover slip each time. Thorough investigation was the carried out, observing all fields within the cover slip border using an Olympus universal wide field research compound microscope, the average of 5 mounts was then taken. Since each drop amounted to 0.1 ml the results on density of species (i.e averages) were multiplied by 10 to give values as numbers of cell per ml. appropriate text such as Sahoo and Seckbach, Prescott, Bellinger and Sigee, Prescott and Cox were used for identification.

Results

Phytoplankton Community Composition

A total number of 52 taxa belonging to 4 divisions Table 1 namely, Bacillariophyta (Diatoms), Chlorophyta (green algae), Cyanophta (Blue-green algae / Cyanobacteria) and Eulenophyta (Euglenoid) were identified from the phytoplankton samples examined. The phytoplankton taxa were mainly of the division Bacillariophyta, which accounted for 84%, 4% and 4% taxa respectively.

S/N

Division / Species

 

 Cyanophyta

1

Merismopedia sp.

2

Oscillatoria princeps

 

Euglenophyta

1

Phacus curvicauda

2

Phacus pleuronectes

 

Chlorophyta

1

Closterium monoliferum

2

Coleochaete sp.

3

Scenedesmus sp.

4

Spirogyra sp.

 

Bacillariophyta

1

Achnanthes sp.

2

Amphiprora sp.

3

Amphiprora sp.

4

Amphora comutata

5

Amphora sp.

6

Amphora veneta

7

Asterionellopsis glacialis

8

Asterionellopsis glacialis

9

Cocconeis sp.

10

Cocconeis sp.

11

Cocconeis sp.

12

Cyclotella sp.

13

Cyclotella sp.

14

Cymbella sp.

15

Diadesmis confervacea

16

Diploneis bombus

17

Diploneis sp.

18

Encyonema sp.

19

Epithemia sorex

20

Fragilaria vaucheriae

21

Gyrosigma scalproides

22

Gyrosigma spencerii

23

Mastogloia sp.

24

Navicula capitoradiata

25

Navicula digitoconvergens

26

Navicula margalithi

27

Navicula sp.

28

Nitzschia intermedia

29

Nitzschia nana

30

Nitzschia inconspicua

31

Nitzschia pellucida

32

Nitzschia sigma

33

Nitzschia sp.

34

Nitzschia sp.

35

Pleurosigma sp.

36

Rhopalodia sp.

37

Rhopalodia sp.

38

Rhopalodia sp.

39

Rhopalodia sp.

40

Rhopalodia sp.

41

Rhopalodia gibberula

42

Rhopalodia musculus

43

Rhopalodia opeculata

44

Thalassiosira sp.

Table 1 Phytoplankton Composition and Distribution

Discussion

Fifty four species belonging to 4 taxonomic groups were recorded in the study area. In this study, results obtained showed fluctuation in species composition throughout the duration of sampling. The phytoplankton composition was dominated by Bacilliarophyta with 44 species and a composition of 84%, chlorophyta; 4 species and 8% while Euglenophyta and cyanophyta had 2 species each with percentage composition of 4% Table 2. The variation in terms of species composition over a period of time is a factor probably due to variation in the level of some important physicochemical parameters prevailing in the Ibeno River. This include water temperature, dissolved oxygen, salricty suspended solids, dissolved inorganic nitrogen. (DIN). This finding is in line with the work of Essien et al, and Kocer and Sen who previously reported similar results as Taxa Baccilariophyta dominating, although Essien's results had a total of 6 divisions present. In another study conducted in a different clime however, Nouwrozi et al.,4 recorded Chlorophyta to be the most abundant and highest chlorophyll species with (34.46%),due to the adequate and the nature of nutrient supply, basin morphometry, mixing dynamics, watee clarity and alkalinity.5 Of the 52 species, only 2 species namely Amphora veneta and Epithemia sorex, from taxa Bacillariophyta were present throughout the entire months of sampling Figure 1. The dominance of bacillariophyta in this study is common to the reports in rivers and creeks of Niger Delta and Nigeria such include Abowei et al. etc.6–10

Taxonomic division

Total no of species

Percentage composition

Bacillariophyta

44

84%

Chlorophyta

4

8%

Euglenophyta

2

4%

Cyanophyta

2

4%

Total

52

100%

Table 2 Number and percentage and composition of phytoplankton division in Ibeno River

Figure 1 No of species of Bacillariophyta, Chlorophyta, Cyanophta and Eulenophyta.

Conclusion

52 species belonging to 4 taxonomic groups were recorded in the study area. The phytoplankton composition was dominanted by Bacilliarophyta with 44 species and 84% composition. Only two species; Amphora veneta and Epithemia sorex were present throughout all the month of sampling.

Acknowledgments

None.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Funding

None.

References

  1. Bopp L, Aumont O, Cadule P, et al. Response of diatoms distribution to global warming and potential implications: A global model study. Geophysical Research Letters. 2005;32(19):L19606.
  2. Denise EM, Thompson EO. Effects of pH change on growth of microalga in water soluble fractions of crude oil. International Journal of Modern Biology and Medicine. 2015;6(1):22–29.
  3. Abagai RT, Tiseer FA, Balarabe ML, et al. Seasonal survey of phytoplankton as biondicators  of water quality in the streams of Kagoro forest, Kaduna, state, northern Nigeria. 2011.
  4. Nowrouzi S, Valavi, H. Effects of environmental factors on phytoplankton abundance and diversity in Kafar Lake. Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science. 2011;6(2):130–140.
  5. Reynolds CS. Phytoplankton periodicity: the interactions of form, function and environmental variability. Freshwater Biology. 1988;14(2):111–142.
  6. Proceedings of the international symposium on environmental science and technology, China.37–41.
  7. Becker W. Microalgae in Human and Animal Nutrition. In: Richmond A, editor. Handbook. Microalgal Culture, Blackwell Publishing Ltd. 2004. 312–351pp.
  8. Denise EM, Osagie E, Affah GP, et al. Physicochemical properties and periphytic algae of Ikot Ebak River, Essien Udim LGA, Akwa Ibom State. FUDMA Journal of Sciences (FJS). 2022;6(2):18–23.
  9. Esenowo IK, Ugwumba AAA, Akpan AU. Evaluating the physicochemical characteristics and plankton diversity of Nwaniba River, South-South Nigeria. Asian Journal of Environment and Ecology. 2017;5(3):1–8.
  10. Zaccaroni A, Scaravelli D. Toxicity of Sea algal toxins to humans and animals. In: Evangelists,  Barsanti V, Frassaniti L, et al. Algal Toxins: nature, occurrence, effect and detection. 2008. 91–158pp.
Creative Commons Attribution License

©2023 Denise, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.