Submit manuscript...
Journal of
eISSN: 2573-2897

Historical Archaeology & Anthropological Sciences

Review Article Volume 5 Issue 1

Weather station and annual temperature dynamics in the elevation gradient (spatial and temporal analysis of Chitwan-Annapurna, Nepal)

Ram Asheshwar Mandal

School of Environmental Science and Management, Pokhara Univeristy, Nepal

Correspondence: Ram Asheshwar Mandal, School of Environmental Science and Management, Pokhara Univeristy, Nepal, Tel 9841450564

Received: January 07, 2020 | Published: February 14, 2020

Citation: Mandal RA. Weather station and annual temperature dynamics in the elevation gradient (spatial and temporal analysis of Chitwan-Annapurna, Nepal). J His Arch & Anthropol Sci. 2020;5(1):37-44. DOI: 10.15406/jhaas.2020.05.00215

Download PDF

Abstract

This research was objectively done to assess gaps in distribution of weather stations, show temperature status and dynamics. Hence, primary data specifically minimum and maximum temperature from 1970 to 2015 was collected from 35 functional weather stations in Chitwan Annapurna Landscape (CHAL) of nineteen districts, Nepal. The map of the weather station was prepared. Moreover, linear regression, ANOVA and Duncan test were applied for statistical analysis. The result revealed that there was only one weather station above 3800 m elevation. The annual average, maximum and minimum temperatures below 200 m were 24.84±0.06, 31.07±0.10 and 18.61±0.730C and the difference between these records was 12.460C. The highest differences in the temperature was recorded 14.560C above 3800 m though the maximum and minimum temperatures were very low only 14.94±0.28 and 0.38±0.200C respectively. There was high correlation r2 with 0.955, 0.922 and 0.911 of average, maximum and minimum temperature against the elevation gradient. The annual increase in average temperature ranges between 0.02-0.060C. There was significance difference in annual increase in temperature according to elevation gradient. Moreover, there were eight statistically significant clusters of increasing temperature according to elevation gradient. The study guides the need of more weather stations.

Keywords: climate, weather, temperature, meteorological station, distribution, increase, altitude

Introduction

The weather predictions are very important for various purposes like agriculture, tourism and travel, energy, irrigation, drinking water supply, fishery, biodiversity conservation and other purposes1 particularly in mountainous country like Nepal. Climate Change is too fast in Nepal and disturbing the livelihood of the citizens in Nepal.2 The touristic activities specifically mountaineering, trekking and travel gets affected by weather in any country. The world is warming and it is not stop soon.3,4 The global surface temperature is projected to exceed by 1.5°C for RCP 4.5, RCP6.0 and RCP8.5 (high confidence) by the end of the 21st century (2081–2100) relative to 1850–1900.5−7 The projection in temperature rise is alarming and it is expected to rise between 2.7 and 4.7 °C by 2100 in Asia.8 The South Asian countries are projected to warm by 1°C (least scenario) by the end of the century.9 The mean annual temperature during the last 25 years period has increased by 1.50C with an average annual increase of 0.060C between 1982 and 2006.10

It is not easy to forecast accurate weather and climate, which suddenly invite huge human, social, physical and economical loss.11,12 There are several causes and risks associated to the prediction of weather and climate.13 Most important reason is unavailability of sufficient records of metrological data due to limit number of weather stations.14 On the other hand, the climate dynamic is the key issue which directly and indirectly relate to professions.15,16 A few scientists have explored the temperature dynamics of Nepal but the research associated with distribution of weather stations and temperature dynamics together particularly in Chitwan Annapurna Landscape (CHAL) area was not studied before. Hence, this research was objectively carried out to find the distribution gaps in weather station; assess the increase in mean temperature and reveal the relationship between temperature and altitude.

Material and methods

Site selection

Weather stations in Chitwan Annapurna Landscape (CHAL) area were selected for the study site which covers Manang, Mustang, Myagdi, Baglung, Gulmi, Arghakhanchi, Palpa, Syangja, Parbat, Kaski, Tanahu, Lamjung, Gorkha, Dhading, Nawalparasi, Chitwan, Makwanpur, Nuwakot and Rasuwa districts. Geographically, records of temperature of these districts represent Tarai (lowlands) to Himalayan regions. Altogether there were seventy five weather stations in CHAL area. However only 34 weather stations are regular and functional. The detail of these districts specifically altitude range, latitude; longitude and area are presented in Table 1.

Districts

Altitude m

No. of weather stations

Latitude  (N) in degree

Longitude  (E) in degree

Manang

1000-6400

2(1)

28.633

84

Mustang

2000-6400

10(4)

29.083

83.74

Myagdi

300-6400

8(2)

28.45

83.48

Baglung

300-5000

4(1)

28.27

83.59

Gulmi

300-3000

3(1)

28.09

83.29

Arghakhanchi

300-3000

2(1)

27.925

82.067

Palpa

300-2000

3(2)

27.868

83.55

Syangja

300-2000

3(1)

28.02

83.8

Parbat

300-4000

3(1)

28.01

80.693

Kaski

300-6400

9(4)

28.212

83.947

Tanahu

300-2000

3(3)

27.918

84.25

Lamjung

300-6400

3(1)

28.555

84.22

Gorkha

300-6401

4(1)

28.038

84.465

Dhading

300-5000

2(1)

27.975

84.433

Nawalparasi

200-2000

5(3)

27.533

83.668

Chitwan

200-2000

3(2)

27.583

84.5

Makwanpur

200-3000

3(2)

27.429

85.03

Nuwakot

300-5000

3(2)

28.17

83.917

Rasuwa

300-5500

2(1)

27.99

85.2

Table 1 Description of districts of CHAL area
Note: figure in parenthesis shows the number of weather stations having complete and regular temperature data

Sampling and experimental design

Temperature data were obtained from the Department of Hydrology and Meteorology, Government of Nepal (GoN) from 1970 to 2015 all 46 years of 34 weather stations. These weather stations were grouped based upon their distribution at interval of 200 m elevation. The graph of distribution of weather stations was prepared using Microsoft excel. The maps of weather stations were also prepared using geographical coordinates (X and Y) of location applying ArcGIS to show the spatial distribution. The text file of temperature data was converted into excel format to calculate the mean annual temperature of minimum, maximum and average temperature. 

Statistical comparison

The Shapiro- Wilk normality test was done in R statistical software to examine the normality of the data. The data of average, minimum and maximum temperature showed the normal distribution (Kothari, 2004). Thus the parametric test specifically One-way ANOVA and multiple post hoc Duncan test were used to examine whether there was significant difference in mean temperature at 5% level of significance according to altitude. The summary statistics, linear regression model17,18 between altitude and temperature as well as increase in temperature between different periods were also calculated.

Results and discussion

Distribution gaps in weather stations

The regular and complete sets of temperature data are available only from 34 weather stations in Chitwan Annapurna Landscape area. Among them more than 55.88% i.e. 19 weather stations occur below 1200 m altitude; 14 (41.17%) weather stations at the elevation range of 1200 to 3600m and only one station i.e. 2.95% above 3600m altitude (Figure 1&Table 1). Some of the weather stations are not functioning well so the complete set of data is not available. The reason of incomplete set of metrological data may be due to irregularity in charging the solar batteries. The solar power system needs at least five hours sunlight each day.19 Another reason may be weather station is not regularly maintained20 due to lack of local technical experts.

Figure 1 Number of weather stations according to elevation gradient altitude and distribution of weather stations.

The analysis reveals that a huge gap in distribution of weather stations in CHAL area according to the elevation band. The weather stations were nil in the elevation range of 600-800m, 2800-3600m and even only one weather station was at above 3800m. Moreover, the available record of temperature at elevation range of 1200-1400 m was not consistent. There are not any standard criteria and policies to maintain the distance between two weather stations. Generally weather stations are installed where there are easy accessibility and transportation to maintain the equipment and monitor the stations. Another reason is, the establishment of weather stations depends up on the objective of the institutions or project. However, the aspects, slope and hilly terrain have high influence on the climatic data.21 There are several weather stations in different parts of hilly region of India. There are 21 weather stations in Assam, 7 in Meghalaya, 1 in Sikkim and 7 in Arunachal Pradesh,22 though these numbers are also inadequate to understand the weather. The Himalayan Environmental Rhythms Observation and Evaluation System (HEROES) Project in Bhutan has been supporting a network of 23 weather stations out of that 20 stations were installed in schools, and 3 in remote mountain locations to relate the records of climate variable with the climate change issue.23 These are some examples of weather stations. However, it is realized that there are inadequate numbers of weather station in hilly areas in Nepal too to forecast the weather precisely (Figures 1&2).

Figure 2 Altitudinal variation in CHAL.

The altitude below 1000 m in CHAL covers about 11858.79 sq km which is nearly 33.07% but the total number of weather station is 15. The area of slope >4000 m in CHAL cover nearly 8282.33 sq km (23.10 %) but there is no any weather station. Thus, the gaps are clearly indicated in weather station which is the problem of weather prediction in Nepal (Table 2). 

Altitude

Area Sq Km

Percentage

Remarks

<1000

11858.79

33.07

1000-2000

8277.78

23.08

2000-3000

3802.65

10.6

3000-4000

3639.46

10.15

>4000

8282.33

23.1

Table 2 Altitude and area coverage

Temperature dynamics according to elevation

The mean annual average, maximum and minimum temperatures were 24.84±0.06, 31.07±0.10 and 18.61±0.73°C below 200 m and the difference between mean maximum and minimum temperature was 12.46°C. The highest differences in temperature was recorded 14.56°C above the 3800 m though the maximum and minimum temperatures were very low only 14.94±0.28 and 0.38±0.20°C respectively. The lower minimum temperature below 6°C was recorded above 2400 m altitude. This research showed that the altitude has high influence on regional temperature which was supported by Jain and Kumar.24 The higher variation in minimum and maximum temperature, the higher influence is on climate change (Table 3).25,26 

Altitude range (m)

Elevation range (m)

Temperature °C based on mean temperature

Remark

Average

Maximum

Minimum

Difference (Max-Min)

<200

154

24.84±0.06

31.07±0.10

18.61±0.73

12.46

200-400

205-358

24.22±.08

30.67±.09

17.77±0.11

12.9

400-600

460-500

23.01±.05

29.20±.07

16.83±.07

12.37

Stations missing in 600-800 &

800-1000

823-965

21.12±0.06

27.07±0.07

15.17±0.06

11.9

1200-1400

1000-1200

1003-1097

20.97±0.08

26.26±0.11

15.68±0.09

10.58

m altitude range

1400-1600

1432-1530

17.68±0.11

22.87±0.16

12.50±0.12

10.37

1600-1800

1740-1760

15.87±0.07

19.67±0.12

12.07±0.06

7.6

1800-2000

1900-1982

15.48±0.11

20.33±0.16

10.63±0.17

9.7

2000-2200

2064

15.25±0.11

19.87±0.08

10.64±0.19

9.23

One station

2200-2400

2314-2384

12.82±0.16

18.02±0.14

7.95±0.28

10.07

2400-2600

2530-2566

11.32±0.10

17.18±0.14

5.46±0.13

11.72

2600-2800

2680-2744

10.62±0.25

16.68±0.23

4.56±0.31

12.12

>3800

3870

7.80±0.28

14.94±0.28

0.38±0.20

14.56

One station

Table 3 Summary statistics of maximum and minimum temperature (0C) of CHAL area
Note 1 There is inconsistency in weather station at 600-800, 1200-1400, 2800-3600 and higher than 3900 m altitudes

Spatial distribution of weather stations

The spatial distribution of weather station showed that there was greater number of weather stations in western parts of CHAL in comparison to eastern area. Though altitudinal variation was very high in Gorkha district, there were only four weather stations. In case of Rasuwa district, there were only two weather stations which cannot represent the climate of western part. Air temperature observations at ground stations are essential but many high-altitude areas (greater than 4.000 m) are still heavily under sampled (Figures 3−5) (Tables 4−6).27 The percentage coverage of aspect in CHAL area is varied. There are 31.81% SW aspect in CHAL and it was followed by 26.81% SE aspect. The distribution of climatic variables of CHAL is also affected due to theses aspects. Obviously the temperature and rainfall are affected because of the hilly aspects. 

Figure 3 Spatial distribution of weather stations in CHAL area Nepal.

Figure 4 Slope dynamics in CHAL.

Figure 5 Aspect dynamics in CHAL area.

Slope

Areas

Percentage

Remarks

0 to 10

16635.25

46.39

10 to 20

13124.82

36.6

20 to 30

5168.107

14.41

30 to 40

878.9349

2.45

>40

53.88979

0.15

Table 4 The slope is another factor affecting the climatic variables in Nepal

Slope

Areas

Percentage

Remarks

0 to 10

16635.25

46.39

10 to 20

13124.82

36.6

20 to 30

5168.107

14.41

30 to 40

878.9349

2.45

>40

53.88979

0.15

Table 5 Aspect dynamics in CHAL area

Correlations

Regression equation

Coefficient of determination R2

Remarks

Average Temperature VS Altitude

Y=0.005X+25.72

0.955

Maximum Temperature VS Altitude

Y=0.005X+31.95

0.92

Minimum Temperature VS Altitude

Y=0.005X+19.78

0.911

Table 6

Annual temperature dynamics and elevation gradient

There was a strong relation between altitude and average annual temperature. The linear regression showed that the R2 value was 0.955. The finding depicted that there was decrease in average temperature according to the elevation gradient from Tarai to Himalaya. This was justified by several studies like research done by Pepin and Seidel28 and Oyler et al.29 Moreover, there is a rapid warming trend in high elevation zone30,31 because of melting snow and ice result in lower surface albedo which contributes to further warming.32 The cooling is another key characteristic of high mountainous region in comparison to plain due to circulation of cold air. In fact, cold air pooling and local heating are happened due to combination of topography and synoptic condition.33,34 This may be one of the reliable reasons of rapid warming in high altitude. Similar results recorded for the relation between mean maximum annual temperature and elevation gradient having coefficient of determination (R2) about 0.922. Available records showed that there was very good relationship between minimum temperature and elevation gradient. The linear regression showed that R2 was 0.911 of these two variables. However, there was high variation in mean minimum temperature.

Conclusion

A big gap in occurrence of weather station at high elevations area especially above 2800-3600 m was noticed. The temperature rise was higher at high elevation and lower at low altitude. There was high correlation between temperature and elevation gradient. The present study reveals the need of weather stations above 2800 m and also emphasizes on the maintenance and monitoring weather stations regularly.35,36

Acknowledgments

None.

Funding

No financial support was available for this project.

Conflicts of interest

Author declares that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Parmesan C, Yohe G. A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. Nature. 2003;42(1):37−42.
  2. Dash SK, Jenamani RK, Kalsi SR, et al. Some Evidence of Climate Change in Twentieth-century India. Climatic Change. 2007;85(3−4):299−321.
  3. Pounds JA, Fogden MPL, Campbell JH. Biological responses to climate change on a tropical mountain. Nature. 1999;398:611–615.
  4. AAS. The science of climate change questions and answers. Australian Academy of Science. Canberra; 2015.
  5. Le Treu H, Somerville R, Cubasch U, et al. Prather, Historical Overview of Climate Change. Climate Change: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. USA: Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY; 2007.
  6. Susie M, Franco G, Pittiglio S, et al. The Future Is Now: An Update on Climate Change Science Impacts and Response Options for California. California Energy Commission: PIER Energy Related Environmental Research Program. 2009;500(1):71.
  7. Dell M, Jones BF, Olken BA. Temperature shocks and economic growth: Evidence from the last half century. American Economic Journal Macroeconomics. 2012;4(3):66–95.
  8. IPCC. Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. In: Core Writing Team, RK Pachauri, LA Meyer, editors. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Switzerland: IPCC, Geneva; 2014. 151 p.
  9. Shrestha AB, Eriksson M. Climate Change in the Himalayas. Nepal: International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development, Kathmandu; 2009.
  10. Shrestha UB, Gautam S, Bawa KS. Widespread Climate Change in the Himalayas and Associated Changes in Local Ecosystems. PLoS One. 2012;7(5):36741.
  11. Wigley T. The Climate Change Commitment. Science. 2005;307:1766−1769.
  12. Slingo J, Palmer T. Uncertainty in weather and climate prediction. Philosphical Translations of the Royal Society. 2011;369:4751–4767.
  13. Moore FC, Diaz DB. Temperature impacts on economic growth warrant stringent mitigation policy. Nature Climate Change. 2015. p. 1−5.
  14. DHM. Observed Climate Trend Analysis in the Districts and Physiographic Zones of Nepal (1971-2014). Nepal: Department of Hydrology and Meteorology, Kathmandu; 2017.
  15. Pindyck RS. Uncertain outcomes and climate change policy. Journal of Environment Economics and Management. 2012;63:289–303.
  16. Sharma G. Nepal plane crash in bad weather killed all 18 on Board. Kathmandu; 2014.
  17. Shayib MA. Applied Statistics. The ebook Company: Book boon; 2013.
  18. Singpurwalla D. A Handbook of Statistics: An Overview of Statistical Methods. 2017.
  19. Jamil I, Jamil R, Jinquan Z, Ming L, et al. Application and Composition Observing System of Automatic Weather Station and Power Grid (PGMIS). Electrical and Electronics Engineering: An International Journal. 2013;2(4):31−45.
  20. Lehner F, Stocker TF. From local perception to global perspective. Nature Climate Change. 2015;5(1:731−735.
  21. Bojinski S. Status of meteorological network spacing requirements in WMO and GCOS guidance material. Switzerland: World Meteorological Organization, Geneva 2; 2010.
  22. PIB. Automatic Weather Stations in North East India. Press Information Bureau: Climate Himalaya; 2011.
  23. BFNPYC. Understanding the Climate Change in Bhutan. Thimpu Bhutan: Bhutan Foundation Nazhoen Pelri Youth Center; 2016.
  24. Jain SK, Kumar V. Trend analysis of rainfall and temperature data for India. Current Science. 2012;102(1):37−49.
  25. Easterling DR, Horton B, Jones PD, et al. Maximum and Minimum Temperature Trends for the Globe. Science. 1997;277(1):1−4.
  26. Fiddes J, Endrizzi S, Gruber S.  Large-area land surface simulations in heterogeneous terrain driven by global data sets: application to mountain permafrost, The Cryosphere. 2015;(1):411–426.
  27. MRI, EDW, WG. Elevation-Dependent Warming In Mountain Regions Of The World. Mountain Research Initiative EDW Working Group. Nature Climate Change. 2015;5(1):424−430.
  28. Pepin NC, Seidel DJ. A global comparison of surface and free-air temperatures at high elevations. Journal Geophysical Resource. 2005;110(1):1−15.
  29. Oyler JW, Dobrowski SZ, Ballantyne AP, et al. Artificial amplification of warming trends across the mountains of the western United States. Geophysical Resource Letter. 2015;42(1):1−9.
  30. Youa Q, Kang S, Pepind N, et al. Relationship between temperature trend magnitude, elevation and mean temperature in the Tibetan Plateau from homogenized surface stations and reanalysis data. Global and Planetary Change. 2010;71(1):124–133.
  31. Rangwala I, Miller JR. Climate change in mountains: A review of elevation-dependent warming and its possible causes. Climate Change. 2012;114(3–4):527–547.
  32. Chen B, WC Chao, X Liu. Enhanced climatic warming in the Tibetan plateau due to doubling CO2: A model study. Climate Dynamics. 2003;20:401–413.
  33. Whiteman CD, Zhong S, Shaw WJ, et al. Cold pools in the Columbia Basin. Weather Forecasting. 2001;16:432–447.
  34. ICIMOD. Sonw Cover Statistics- Nepal. E-bulletin: International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD); Nepal. 2013.
  35. Kothari CR. Research Methodology Methods and Techniques. India: College of Commerce, University of Rajsthan, Jaipur; 2004.
  36. Shrestha AB, Wake CP. Maximum temperature trends in the Himalaya and its vicinity: An analysis based on temperature records from Nepal for the period 1971-94. Journal of Climate.1999;12:2775−2787.
Creative Commons Attribution License

©2020 Mandal. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.