Submit manuscript...
Journal of
eISSN: 2377-4312

Dairy, Veterinary & Animal Research

Research Article Volume 12 Issue 2

Prevalence of food additive in hen meat products

Diaa Eldin IM,1 Eman T Abou Sayed Ahmed,1 Hamada M Hassan,1 Fahim A Shaltout,2 Gehan Abdallah El-shorbagy1

1Department of Food Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Zagazig University, Egypt
2Department of Food Control, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Benha University, Egypt

Correspondence: Fahim A Shaltout, Department of Food Control, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Benha University, Egypt

Received: September 25, 2023 | Published: October 26, 2023

Citation: Diaa EIM, Eman TASA, Hamada MH, et al. Prevalence of food additive in hen meat products. J Dairy Vet Anim Res. 2023;12(2):104-106 DOI: 10.15406/jdvar.2023.12.00332

Download PDF

Abstract

The present investigation aimed to assess chemical monosodium glutamate as flavoring agent in processed hen meat products. One hundred random of processed hen meat samples were estimated. The highest concentration mean± SE chemical Food additive Monosodium glutamate (mg/g.) as an flavoring agent was found in samples of canned hen (3.950 ± 0.51) than in hen pannae samples (1.850 ± 0.28), hen minced meat samples were the highest concentration (2.750 ± 1.05), followed by hen shawerma samples (1.730 ± 0.220), and fried hen meat samples (1.470 ± 0.850) mg/g. of chemical Food additive Monosodium glutamate as flavoring agent. So, the current estimated chemical Food additive Monosodium glutamate as flavoring agent contents in the examined processed hen samples were less than the acceptable levels stated by Egyptian Standards, FDA stated that contamination of the examined chicken meat samples in this study revealed that the amount of chemical monosodium glutamate as flavoring agent causing reactions in human being ranged from 0.500 to 3.00 mg. so a typical serving of a foodstuff with added chemical Monosodium glutamate as flavoring agent has less than 0.50 g. of Monosodium glutamate as flavoring agent. Reduction the public health hazards of exposure to these food additives as flavoring agent. The corrected and safe doses of chemical Food additive Monosodium glutamate as flavoring agent in food of human.

Keywords: processed hen meat, high performance liquid chromatography, flavoring agent., hen minced meat

Introduction

Important changes in the processed hen have occurred recently, contamination of the examined chicken meat samples in this study indicates mostly as a result of increasing world population increase. These changes causes increased popularity of the processed hen as canned hen, other processed hen.1,2 Processed Chicken products act as an important source of human protein supplement of the world. processed Chicken products act as a good source of digestible protein, low in cholesterol content, fat content, essential amino acids content, minerals content, vitamins content and minerals content, as well as human being increasing in number, demand of animal proteins, increasing represents a serious challenge in which hen products plays an important role in reducing nutrition gap as a rapid and economic source of nutrients.

The using of chemical Food additive monosodium glutamate as flavoring agent, and other additives in processed hen has become increased. chemical Food additive monosodium glutamate as flavoring agent known as Umami, chemical Food additive monosodium glutamate as flavoring agent is present in a group in a wide range of processed hen as a flavoring agent, protein or pure chemical monosodium salt as flavoring agent.3–6 Chemical Monosodium glutamate as flavoring agent is also used as a processed hen preservative.7–10,1

Chemical Food additive Monosodium glutamate as flavoring agent is used in animal feed and food processing. It may be found in hundreds of processed hen. At the same time, health concerns regarding the processed hen widespread usage. Legal limits do not inhibit people from tasting salt Monosodium glutamate as flavoring agent. In USA the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology (FASEB) reported in 1995 that chemical food additive Monosodium glutamate as flavoring agent access in doses varied from 0.500 to 3.00 mg. causes transient chemical food additive Monosodium glutamate as flavoring agent disease.7,11,12 Possible toxic effects causes obesity, CNS damage, disturbence in fatty tissues physiology, liver cirrhosis, and reproductive problems.13–15 Chemical food additive Monosodium glutamate as flavoring agent is a controversial substance in terms of its harmful effects after long-time dosing.7,11,6 The present study was planned out to detect chemical food additive Monosodium glutamate as flavoring agent in processed hen marketed in Egypt by using HPLC -UV/DAD.

Material and methods

Sampling: A total number of 100 random samples of processed hen represented as canned hen, hen pannae, hen shawerma, hen minced meat and fried hen (20 of each). The samples were transferred as soon as possible to the laboratory without undue delay and subjected to detection of chemical food additive Monosodium glutamate as flavoring agent in processed hen samples according to the methods recommended by Demirhanet al., (2015) and Soysevenet al., (2021) by using High Performance Liquid Chromatography -UV/DAD, The data subjected to ANOVA by using SPSS software (version 18) according to the method recommended by IBM (2019).

Results

in Table 1, results showed the chemical monosodium glutamate as flavoring agent limits (mg/Kg.) were different in the processed hen samples, canned hen were the high in concentration limits in processed hen with mean (3.950±0.510) ranged from (3.020): (4.810) followed by (1.850±0.280) ranged from (1.450): (2.400) in hen pannae. Processed hen, hen minced meat samples mean was (2.750±1.050) ranged from (0.78) to (4.380) followed by (1.730±0.22) ranged from (1.300): (2.000) hen shawerma and (1.470± 0.850) ranged from (0.410): (3.170) fried hen samples. the % of non- Reported Monosodium glutamate as flavoring agent on the labels were 35%, 35% , 50% , 50% and 50% canned hen , hen pannae , hen minced meat , hen shawerma and fried hen, respectively as shown in Table 2.

Discussion

Chicken meat products act as an important source of human protein because they provide good source of digestible protein content, low cholesterol content, fat content, essential amino acids content, minerals content, vitamins content and minerals content. chemical Food additive Monosodium glutamate as flavoring agent is one of the most popularly used as flavoring agent in the processed hen meat, its consumption increased, possible bad effects recorded results came in line with those recorded.7,16,17 The FDA stated that some hazard effects associated with greater chemical food additive Monosodium glutamate as flavoring agent. Circulatory hazards, cardiac effects, muscular damage, gastrointestinal hazards, and neurological hazards are more prevalent.7,18 chemical Food additive Monosodium glutamate as flavoring agent causes genetic damage, free radicals to cause harm effect to the cells.7,19,20

According to the results obtained in Table 1, there were differences in chemical food additive Monosodium glutamate as flavoring agent values in the examined processed hen meat. Whereas canned hen meat had the highest concentration mean value of chemical food additive Monosodium glutamate as flavoring agent, followed by hen minced meat, hen pannae, hen shawerma, and fried hen meat samples, and fried hen meat samples had the lower results. In comparison with previous studies, we found results of canned hen meat were lower than that obtained by7,18 (210.80 mg/Kg.). Then pannae were higher results than those obtained by7,21 (1.4570 mg/Kg.),22,23 (1.600 mg/Kg.) and24,18 (1.390 mg/Kg.). chemical food additive Monosodium glutamate as flavoring agent in the processed hen minced meat samples was higher than with those recorded by24 (1.959 mg/g.) and (Baciuet al., 2020) (0.1780 mg/Kg.) but lower than that recorded by (Rohdes et al., 2015) (5.40 mg/g.). fried hen meat samples, chemical food additive Monosodium glutamate as flavoring agent levels were lower than those recorded by Hassan et al., 2018 (1.849 mg/Kg.) and (Soysevenet al., 2021) ( 21.300 mg/Kg.)

Processed hen

Min.

Max.

Mean ± S.E value

Canned hen meat

3.020

4.810

3.950 ± 0.51

hen pannae

1.450

2.400

1.850 ± 0.28

hen minced meat

0.780

4.380

2.750 ± 1.05

hen shawerma

1.300

2.000

1.730 ± 0.22

Fried hen meat

0.410

3.170

1.470 ± 0.85

Table 1 Monosodium glutamate as flavoring agent (mg/g.) of examined processed hen (n=20.0 of each)

The concentration of chemical food additive Monosodium glutamate as flavoring agent in each processed hen meat product varies from each other, recorded results came in line with those recorded.7,25

Chemical Food additive Monosodium glutamate as flavoring agent must be written on the product label.7 The current study as shown in Table 2, 12.0% of the processed hen meat samples, including 35.0% of canned hen meat and pannae, contained chemical food additive Monosodium glutamate as flavoring agent not reported on the product label. These results higher than the limits of E.S (2010).

Product type

Reported on labels

Non- Reported on labels

No.

%

No.

%

Canned hen meat

7.0

35.0

13.0

65.0

hen pannae

7.0

35.0

13.0

65.0

hen minced meat

10.0

50.0

10.0

50.0

hen shawerma

10.0

50.0

10.0

50.0

Fried hen meat

10.0

50.0

10.0

50.0

Table 2 Reported and non-Reported Monosodium glutamate as flavoring agent on labels of examined processed hen (n=20.0 of each)

The No Observed Adverse Effect Limit (NOAEL) limit of 0.032 mg of chemical food additive Monosodium glutamate as flavoring agent /Kg bw/day). the Acceptable Daily Intake (30.0 mg/Kg bw per day), the Acceptable Daily Intake of chemical food additive Monosodium glutamate as flavoring agent ranging from 0 and 0.120 mg/kg.9

Chemical food additive Monosodium glutamate as flavoring agent documented toxicity was minimum after short-time dosing (0.050 mg/Kg bw/day)26 at long term ingestion, because of the cumulative effect, there are no limits to the level of chemical Monosodium glutamate that can be purchased. because daily chemical food additive Monosodium glutamate as flavoring agent intake may be difficult due to unknown concentration of the additives prevalent in the processed hen meat.27,25,17,28–45

Conclusion

From this study we can conclude that, the Chicken meat showed more levels of chemical Food additive Monosodium glutamate as flavoring agent were in canned hen meat and the lowest one was in fried hen meat. Food additive Monosodium glutamate as flavoring agent consumed. Processed Chicken meat that harmfully affects the consumers and is write the quantity on hen meat product label.

Acknowledgments

None.

Conflicts of interest

Author declares there is no conflict of interest in publishing the article.

Funding

None.

References

  1. Diaa Eldin I, Eman T, Abou Sayed Ahmed, et al. Trials to improve quality of marinated poultry meat by using chemical food additives. Open Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences. 2022;4:(1024):27–34.
  2. Shaltout FA, Salem R, Eldiasty E, et al. Seasonal impact on the prevalence of yeast contamination of chicken meat products and edible giblet. Journal of Advanced Veterinary Research. 2022;12(5):641–644.
  3. Zealand FS. Monosodium Glutamate, a Safety Assessment. Technical Report Series No. 20 FSANZ; 2003.
  4. Edris AM, Hemmat MI, Shaltout FA, et al. Study on incipient spoilage of chilled chicken cuts-up. Benha Vet Med J. 2012;23(1):81–86.
  5. Edris AM, Hemmat MI, Shaltout FA, et al. Chemical analysis of chicken meat with relation to its quality. Benha Vet Med J. 2012;23(1):87–92.
  6. Shaltout FA. Microbiological quality of chicken carcasses at modern poultry plant. Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing. 2020;3(1):1–6.
  7. Shaltout FA. Mycological and mycotoxicological profile of some meat products. PhD Thesis, Faculty of veterinary medicine, Moshtohor. Zagazig University; 1996.
  8. Hassan MA, Shaltout FA. Comparative study on storage stability of beef, chicken meat, and fish at chilling temperature. Alex J Vet Sci. 2004;20(21):21–30.
  9. Mortensen A, Aguilar F, Crebelli R, et al. Re-evaluation of glutamic acid (E 620), sodium glutamate (E 621), potassium glutamate (E 622), calcium glutamate (E 623), ammonium glutamate (E 624) and magnesium glutamate (E 625) as food additives. EFSA J. 2017;15(7):e04910.
  10. Shaltout FA, El Zahaby D, Lotfy M, et al. Bacteriological profile of chicken meat products. Food Nutr Current Res. 2018;1(3):83–90.
  11. Hassanin FS, Shaltout FA, Homouda S, et al. Natural preservatives in raw chicken meat. Benha Vet Med J. 2019a;37:41–45.
  12. Ragab A, Abobakr M, Edris, et al. Effect of titanium dioxide nanoparticles and thyme essential oil on the quality of the chicken fillet. BVMJ. 2022;41(2):38–40.
  13. Shaltout FA. Studies on mycotoxins in meat and meat by products. MVSc Thesis faculty of veterinary medicine, Moshtohor. Zagazig University; 1992.
  14. Hassanin FS, Hassan MA, Shaltout FA, et al. Chemical criteria of chicken meat. Benha Veterinary Medical Journal. 2017;33(2):457–464.
  15. Shaltout FA, Salem R, Eldiasty E, et al. Experimental studying the effect of propionibacterium and acetic acid on candida albicans contaminating chicken fillet in chilling conditions. Journal of Chemistry: Education Research and Practice. 2022;6(2)371–376.
  16. Shaltout FA, Edris AM. Contamination of shawerma with pathogenic yeasts. Assiut Vet Med J. 1999;40(64):34–39.
  17. Moldovan OL, Rusu A, Tanase C, et al. Glutamate - A multifaceted molecule: Endogenous neurotransmitter, controversial food additive, design compound for anti-cancer drugs. A critical appraisal. Food and Chemical Toxicology journal. 2021;153:112290.
  18. Shaltout F. Effect of monosodium glutamate substitutes on physiochemical, microbiological and sensory properties of fried chicken breast strips. Biomed J Sci & Tech Res. 2022;42(4):33753–33761.
  19. Shaltout FA, El-diasty EM, Salem RM, et al. Mycological quality of chicken carcasses and extending shelf -life by using preservatives at refrigerated storage. Vet Med J Giza. 2016;62(3):1–10.
  20. Imam RS. Genotoxicity of monosodium glutamate: a review on its causes, consequences and prevention. Indian J Pharmaceut Educ Resear. 2019;53(4):s510–s517.
  21. Rodriguez MS, Gonzalez ME, Centurion ME. Determination of monosodium glutamate in meat products. The journal of the Argentine Chemical Society. 2003;91(4/6):41–45.
  22. Afraa A, Mounir A, Zaid A. Colorimetric determination of monosodium glutamate in food samples using l-glutamate oxidase. Chin J Appl Environ Biol. 2013;19(6):1069–1072.
  23. Shaltout FA, Marionette Z, Nassif, et al. Quality of battered and breaded chicken meat products. Glob J Agric Food Safety Sci. 2014;1(2):283–299.
  24. Hassan MA, Amin RA, El-Taher, et al. Chemical preservatives in some meat products. Benha Veterinary Medical Journal. 2018;35(1):58–65.
  25. Wijayasekara K, Wansapala J. Uses, effects and properties of monosodium glutamate (MSG) on food & nutrition. Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2017;2(3):132–143.
  26. EFSA. Call for technical data on the permitted food additives glutamic acid (E 620), monosodium glutamate (E 621), monopotassium glutamate (E 622), calcium diglutamate (E 623), monoammonium glutamate (E 624) and magnesium diglutamate (E 625). 2019.
  27. Siddiqua NS. Tasting salt (monosodium glutamate) in food products: discussion on health concerns ethical business Practices. Saudi Journal of Biomedical Research. 2017;2(5):122–126.
  28. Arisseto Bragotto AP, Feltes MMC, Block JM. Food quality and safety progress in the Brazilian food and beverage industry: chemical hazards. Food Quality and Safety. 2017;1(2):117–129.
  29. Demirhan BE, Demirhan B, Sonmez C, et al. Monosodium glutamate in chicken and beef stock cubes using high-performance liquid chromatography. Food Additives & Contaminants Part B. 2015;8(1):63–66.
  30. Dora DB, Andreea M, Teodor V. Extraction procedure and cyclic voltammetry assay for detection of monosodium glutamate from different processed food sources. Rev Chim. 2020;71(8):63–71.
  31. ES Egyptian organization for standardization and quality control: Detection of food preservatives. Report No. 1688, 1972 and 1973. 2005.
  32. Hasanin FS, Shaltout FA, Salem RM, et al. Mycological profile of frozen meat with special reference to aflatoxin b1 and ochratoxin a residues in frozen meat. Journal of Global Biosciences. 2019;8(9):6424–6438.
  33. Iammarino M, Marino R, Albenzio M. How meaty? Detection and quantification of adulterants, foreign proteins and food additives in meat products. International Journal of Food Science and Technology. 2017;52:851–863.
  34. IBM Corp. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 26.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp; 2019.
  35. Kazmi Z, Fatima I, Perveen S, et al. Monosodium glutamate: Review on clinical reports. International Journal of Food Properties. 2017;20:1807–1815.
  36. Nahar S, Allah Bakhsh M, Shafiur Rahman, et al. Volatile and nonvolatile taste compounds and their correlation with umami and flavor characteristics of chicken nuggets added with milk fat and potato mash. Food Chemistry. 2021;343:128499.
  37. Niaz K, Zaplatic E, Spoor J. Guest editorial: extensive use of monosodium glutamate: a threat to public health? Excli J. 2018;17:964.
  38. Questions and answers on monosodium glutamate (MSG). US Food and Drug Administration; 2022.
  39. Shaltout FA, Heikal GI, Ghanem AM. Mycological quality of some chicken meat cuts in Gharbiya governorate with special reference to Aspergillus flavus virulent factors. BVMJ. 2022;42(1):12–16.
  40. Shaltout Fahim, Nada SM, Wahba SF. Prevalence of salmonella in some chicken meat products. Benha Veterinary Medical Journal. 2019;36(2):33–39.
  41. Shaltout FA, Mohammed IZ, Afify E. Bacteriological profile of some raw chicken meat cuts in Ismailia city, Egypt. Benha Veterinary Medical Journal. 2020;39(1):11–15.
  42. Sing M. Fact or fiction? The MSG controversy; 2005.
  43. Soyseven M, Aboul‐Enein HY, Arli G. Development of a HPLC method combined with ultraviolet/diode array detection for determination of monosodium glutamate in various food samples. International Journal of Food Science & Technology. 2021;56(1):461–467.
  44. US Food and Drug Administration. FDA and Monosodium Glutamate (MSG); 1995.
  45. Zandy SL, Doherty JM, Wibisono ND, et al. High sensitivity HPLC method for analysis of in vivo extracellular GABA using optimized fluorescence parameters for o-phthalaldehyde (OPA)/sulfite derivatives. Journal of Chromatography B Analytical Technologies in the Biomedical and Life Sciences. 2017;1055–1056:1–7.
Creative Commons Attribution License

©2023 Diaa, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.