Proceeding Volume 3 Issue 5
Independent Poultry Consultant, Russia
Correspondence: Edward S Mailyan, Independent Poultry Consultant, Moscow, Russia, Tel 7 910 466 72 94
Received: July 20, 2016 | Published: August 18, 2016
Citation: Mailyan ES. Escherichia coli: an infectious or a factorial pathogen? J Dairy Vet Anim Res. 2016;3(5):185-187. DOI: 10.15406/jdvar.2016.03.00096
Esherichia coli (rus.; кишечная палочка [kishechnaya palochka]- “intestinal rod”) – is a well-known and widely studied ubiquitous Gram-negative, facultative anaerobic, non-sporulating rod-shaped bacterium, isolated it 1885 by a German-Austrian pediatrician from the feces of healthy individuals and originally named Bacterium (bacillus) coli communis.
As natural inhabitants of the lower intestine of warm-blooded organisms, most of more than 700 known E.coli serotypes behave like harmless commensals, but some (EHEC, ETEC, EIEC, EaggEC, EPEC and DAEC) can cause serious illness in humans (e.g. O104:H4, O121, O104:H21, O157:Н7 etc.) including bloody diarrhea, stomach cramps, vomiting and occasionally fever. The bacteria can also cause pneumonia, neonatal meningitis, hemolytic-uremic syndrome, peritonitis, mastitis, septicemia, and there is evidence of their involvement in cancer. Strains of E. coli that cause disease outside the intestinal tract of any species share common characteristics and are called Extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli (ExPEC). Research into ExPEC has shown that its potential transmission from food animal sources is likely to be implicated in human infections and that chickens, together with beef and pork, are a major reservoir. Nowadays the most dangerous are so called ESBL E.coli, which produce an enzyme called extended-spectrum beta lactamase (ESBL). The Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) included ESBL E.coli into the group of multi-drug resistant “ESKAPE bacteria” (“Bad Bugs – No Drugs”), which includes Enterococcus faecium (VRE), Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), Klebsiella pneumoniae (ESBL), Acinetobacter baumanii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterobacter species.
The occurrence of ESBL E. coli in chicken meat increases worldwide. According to the Technical University of Denmark (2012) in Danish chicken meat it increased from 8.6% in 2010 to 44% 2011 while the occurrence in imported chicken meat was 50% in 2010 and 48% in 2011. Colibacillosis was first described in chickens in 1894. Since then, there have been numerous reports on colibacillosis in poultry and considerable research on the disease has been completed. Many investigators doubt that E. coli is a primary pathogen. Others are convinced that certain serotypes are primary pathogens and their opinion seems to prevail. When in mammals it is mostly a primary enteric or urinary tract disease, colibacillosis in poultry is typically a localized or systemic infection occurring secondarily when host defenses have been impaired or overwhelmed by virulent E. coli strains - avian pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC). Most APEC are ExPEC and share characteristics with mammalian ExPEC. The O (somatic) antigen serotypes most commonly associated with disease outbreaks in poultry are O1, O2, O35, and O78. The K (capsular) antigens most commonly associated with virulence are K1, K80, K88, K99. In the intestinal tract of normal poultry, nonpathogenic serotypes far outnumber pathogenic serotypes, with 10-15% of intestinal coliforms being potential pathogens.
Birds are continuously exposed to the bacteria through contaminated feces, water, dust, and environment. Poultry colibacillosis has many “faces”: colisepticemia, coligranulomatosis (Hjarre’s disease), omphalitis and yolk sac infection, aerosacculitis (chronic respiratory disease, CRD), swollen-head syndrome (SHS), panophthalmitis, conjunctivitis, pericarditis, pneumonia, perihepatitis, splenitis, salpingitis, “egg peritonitis” (in layers, breeders), cellulitis, osteomyelitis/artritis/tenosynovitis, femoral head necrosis (FHN), food pad dermatitis (FPD), enteritis etc. However, lesions alone do not allow concluding about E. coli infection, because other opportunistic bacteria (Aerobacter, Proteus, Klebsiella, Pseudomonas, Salmonella, Bacillus, Staphylococcus, enteric Streptococcus, Clostridia, ORT, MG, MS, MM, Pasteurella, Bordetella, etc.) can behave similarly to E. coli, as secondary infections.
Among the conditions, predisposing to the development of E.coli infection in poultry there are numerous external and internal factors, such as:
E. coli status in Russian poultry industry (2005-2013)
Despite the tremendous increase in poultry meat production in Russian Federation during 2000 – 2012 (~500%) the average broiler performance results are rather moderate: DWG 50 g, FCR 1,83, mortality 7% at 40 days, which roughly corresponds to the genetic potential of the main broiler breeds (Ross, Cobb, Hubbard) in 2003. At the same time the Min-Max spread of the results is very big: the EPEF (European Production Efficiency Factor) varies from 230 to 390 points, sometimes even on the farms of the same integrator. The age/size of the farms, the quality/cost of the constructions/equipment/insulation, cleaning/disinfection procedures, the farm management/operation style as well as the personnel’s experience/attitude to the work determine the final results. Even some old but very well managed production units can show outstanding performance (close to EPEF 400), whereas the other new farms can hardly reach 2/3 of those results. According to the official statistics1 the dominating infectious poultry pathology in Russia has bacterial origin with Colibacteriosis on the top of the list (48.5%). Poultry manure composition confirms the prevalence of E.coli.2 A similar proportion was found on the surface of broiler carcasses.1
The most epidemiologically important HUS-associated E.coli serotype isolated from chicken in Russia is EHEC O157:Н7. During the period of 2005-2013 we have accomplished 462 technical visits to 73 broiler farms in Russia (including the old and newly built) , with a complete analysis of all production chain parameters from broiler breeders rearing, hatching eggs production and incubation - to broilers slaughter, with instrumental assessment of microclimate parameters through all growing phases (T, RH, CO/CO2, NH3 air flow visualization), performed 329 autopsies on more than 10 000 birds, followed by serological, bacteriological examinations (when necessary); performed more than 2500 laboratory tests of raw materials and feed samples. The preliminary analysis of the work results demonstrated prevailing presence of E.coli as local and systemic infections in 48% of the cases, leg problems – 22%, metabolic and enteric disorders – 14% each.3,4
Such a high level of respiratory infections with the presence of E. Coli (omphalitis, CRD aerosacculitis, SHS (ART), coliperitonitis, pericarditis, perihepatitis) as well as leg problems (FPD, varus/valgus, rickets, TD, FHN, spondylolisthesis, arthritis, tenosinovitis) on Russian broiler farms can be explained by a combination of several major factors: the farm size (250.000-1.8 mln broilers) combined with the negative influence of suboptimal environmental conditions (heat, cold, high NH3, CO2, draught, dust, high litter humidity) throughout the year (with higher incidence in transitional periods - spring, autumn), often poor DOC quality compromised by overheating, dehydration during incubation, generally low level of biosecurity (multiage, “rolling” infections), often application of “hot” immunosuppressive vaccines (IBD), wrong vaccination timing and technique (too fine spray IBV, TRT) and unreasonable usage of broad-spectrum antibiotics, sometimes without sensitivity test, wrong doses and duration. We frequently registered overstocking (up to 25 birds (60 kg meat)/m2), foot pad lesions and digestive problems (disbacteriosis, necrotic enteritis, subclinical coccidiosis) especially on the old integrated complexes, combining for decades all the production chain elements (breeders, incubation, feed production, slaughter house) on one site or in an immediate vicinity. The culling in some the flocks with non-starters, MAS-chickens, femur head necrosis could reach 10-15% with a total loss up to 20-25%. Typical for such farms was poor flock uniformity from the first week and high carcass condemnation in the slaughterhouse.
None.
Author declares that there is no conflict of interest.
©2016 Mailyan. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.