Review Article Volume 1 Issue 4
Cairo University, Jordan
Correspondence: Firas Mahmoud Abu Samra, Cairo University, Jordan, Tel 962777430432
Received: July 30, 2014 | Published: September 10, 2014
Citation: Samra FMA. Dentoalveolar injuries classification-management- biological consequences. J Dent Health Oral Disord Ther. 2014;1(4):106-111. DOI: 10.15406/jdhodt.2014.01.00025
In this article I will explain the different kinds of Dentoalveolar trauma. And I will demonstrate the crown fractures either the complicated and non complicated fractures or how to manage them in the dental office. Then I will demonstrate the different kinds of root fractures either horizontal or vertical and how to manage these cases in the dental office. After that I will demonstrate the different cases of avulsion of the teeth and how to manage them. Finally I will attach a table of the biological consequence of the Dentoalveolar trauma and the different type of splinting.
Keywords: enamel, dentin, cementum, pulp, ellis classification, prognosis, immature tooth, vital pulp therapy, apexogenesis, apexofication
People usually suffer many accidents that in their daily day-to-day life. Whether they are adults or children, causing injuries in their teeth or tissues that support them, which leads to teeth or bone fractures. Here we overlook over the injuries that affect the teeth and how to diagnose and treat them.
There are many types of Dentoalveolar injuries that can be classified into:
Crown Craze or Crack (i.e. infraction) |
Crack or incomplete fracture of the enamel without a loss of tooth structure |
Horizontal or Vertical Crown Fracture |
Confined to enamel Enamel and dentin involved Enamel, dentin, and exposed pulp involved Horizontal or vertical Oblique (involving the mesioincisal or distoincisal angle) |
Crown-Root Fracture |
No pulp involvement Pulp involvement |
Horizontal Root Fracture |
Involving apical third Involving middle third Involving cervical third Horizontal or vertical |
Sensitivity (i.e. Concussion) |
Injury to the tooth-supporting structure, resulting in sensitivity to touch or percussion but without mobility or displacement of the tooth |
Mobility (i.e. Subluxation or Looseness) |
Injury to the tooth-supporting structure, resulting in tooth mobility but without tooth displacement |
Tooth Displacement |
Intrusion (displacement of tooth into its socket—usually associated with compression fracture of socket) Extrusion (partial displacement of tooth out of its socket—possibly no concomitant fracture of alveolar bone) Labial displacement (alveolar wall fractures probable) Lingual displacement (alveolar wall fractures probable) Lateral displacement (displacement of booth in mesial or distal direction, usually into a missing tooth space—alveolar wall fractures probable) |
Avulsion |
Complete displacement of tooth from its socket (may be associated with alveolar wall fractures) |
Alveolar Process Fracture |
|
Table 1 Dentoalveolar trauma1
Fracture injuries
There are two types of fracture injuries, Uncomplicated Fractures & Complicated Fractures, and I will discuss each type individually
Complicated crown fractures
In the Crown Fractures as I mentioned that all tooth layers are included in the fracture line. This type is managed by the vital pulp therapy or complete endodontic treatment depends on the following factors:
Root fractures
In the root fractures, which involve cementum, dentin & pulp. It could be horizontal or vertical.
Horizontal root fractures
In the horizontal root fracture which may show bleeding from the sulcus, the coronal segment is displaced, but generally the apical segment is not displaced. The chance of pulp necrosis is about 25% may result from displacement, but in the apical segment is rare due to the apical pulp circulation is not disrupted. Radiographic diagnosis is made by one occlusal film and three preiapical films (one at 0 degree, then one each at + and - 15 degrees from the vertical axis of the tooth).
There are four healing patterns have been described the first three types are considered successful. The fourth is typical when the coronal segment loses its vitality which is:
With root fractures that have maintained the vitality of the pulp, the main goal of treatment is to enhance the healing process. Prognosis increases with quick treatment, close reduction of the root segments, and splinting. When the fracture is in the level of or coronal to the crest of the alveolar bone (Figure 5), the prognosis is poor. This case is managed by stabilizing the coronal fragment with rigid splint for 2 to 4 months. If reattachment of the fractured segments is not possible, extraction of the coronal segment is indicated.
When the fracture in the midroot (Figure 6), non rigid splinting for 2 to 4 weeks is the treatment of choice. The probability of pulp necrosis is for the most part is limited to the coronal segment. The pulp lumen is wide at the apical extent of the coronal segment so that the apexification may be indicated. In rare cases when both coronal and apical pulps are necrotic, full RCT through the fracture is difficult, and the necrotic apical segments may be removed surgically. And when the fracture is in the apical part (Figure 7) of the root, the pulp will mostly be vital and the tooth will have little or no mobility .It has the best prognosis.
Vertical root fractures
The vertical root fracture starts apically & progresses coronaly, and usually is in the buccal-lingual plane of roots. In most cases, there is an isolated probing defect at the site of the fracture. There is an important diagnostic sign which is a radiolucency from the apical region to the middle of the root (J-shaped or teardrop-shaped). It may be accompanied by other entitles such as a periodontal disease or failed root canal treatment.
There are some predisposing factors such as:
Even if we see that sign from the radiograph we can confirm the vertical root fracture by an exploratory surgical flap to see the fracture. We can manage these cases by:
This case is the worst case of the fractures of the roots.
Displacement injuries
Also known as “Luxation” which is the effect that ends to dislocate the tooth from the alveolus, which known as (Ellis Class V).
Luxation is classified into different cases which are
|
Immature Apex @ 5 yrs |
Mature Apex @ 5yrs |
Infarction |
No negative sequela |
|
Enamel (fx) |
No negative sequela |
|
Enamel-Dentin f(x) |
No negative sequela |
-5% pulpal necrosis |
Enamel-dentin- pulp f(x) |
-7 % pulpal necrosis with pulp capping -5% pulpal necrosis with partial pulpotomy |
-5% pulpal necrosis with partial pulpotomy |
Root (fx) |
-100% hard tissue healing - 8% connective tissue healing |
Apical 1/3 -23% pulp necrosis - 9% tooth loss |
Middle 1/3 -35% pulpal necrosis -2% ankylosis - 8% marginal bone loss |
||
-10% tooth loss Coronal 1/3 - 30% pulpal necrosis -28% marginal bone loss |
||
-44% tooth loss |
||
Immature Apex crown fracture with or without pulp @ 5yrs |
Mature Apex crown fracture with or without pulp @ 5yrs |
|
Concussion |
-2% pulpal necrosis |
- 10% pulpal necrosis - 4% repair related resorption -1% marginal bone loss |
Subluxation |
-20% pulpal necrosis -5% infection related resorption |
-40% pulpal necrosis -5% repair related resorption -2%infection related resorption -3% ankylosis |
Extrusion |
-17% pulpal necrosis |
-88% pulpal Necrosis -16% infection related resorption -22% marginal bone loss |
Lateral Luxation |
-52% pulpal necrosis -29% infection related resorption |
-100% pulpal necrosis - 8% repair related resorption -15% marginal bone loss |
Intrusion |
-72% pulpal pathosis - 4% repair related resorption -34% infection related resorption -13% ankylosis -4% marginal bone loss -8% tooth loss |
-100% pulpal necrosis -1% repair related resorption -28% infection related resorption -40% Ankylosis -43% marginal bone loss -29% moth loss |
Table 2 All information taken from international association of dental traumatology2
The steps of managing this case are mentioned as follows:
When we manage this case, we must classify the cases into two categories:
Closed apex, extra oral dry time <60 minutes, tooth stored in a special storage media, milk or saliva
Closed apex, extra oral day time >60 minutes:
Open apex, extra oral day time <60 minutes, tooth reserved in a special storage media, milk or saliva
Open apex, extra oral day time >60 minutes
Replantation usually is not indicated.
If we will replant it, try to do RCT outside the mouth or apexification inside the mouth.
Guidelines about the types of splints
According to the current guidelines and within the limits of an in vitro study, it can be stated that flexible or semi rigid splints such as the titanium trauma splint and wire-composite splints 1 and 2 are appropriate for splinting teeth with dislocation injuries and root fractures, whereas rigid splints such as wire-composite splint 3 and the titanium ring splint can be used to treat alveolar process fractures (Figure 12).
From this learning article we have shown some important points that we must put in our consideration. We must try to conserve the vitality of the pulp whenever possible. The horizontal root fractures in the cervical region are the worst types of horizontal root fractures and require more time to heal and have the worst prognosis. The vertical root fractures are the worst type of all fractures of the root, which have the worst prognosis & require extraction of the root or amputation of multi-rooted tooth. The open apex cases have better prognosis than closed apex cases. In avulsion cases, time factor is from the most important factors to success, which must be less than 30 minutes of extra oral time to have the success rate of 50% and more.
None.
The author declares that there is no conflict of interest.
©2014 Samra. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.